HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230712Comments_1.pdf1
From: Ron Carr <ronwca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 3:30 PM
To: Jan Noriyuki <jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov>
Subject: Island park water
CAUTION: This email originated outside the State of Idaho network. Verify links and atachments BEFORE you
click or open, even if you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your agency service desk with any concerns.
My name is Ron Carr. We have had a family cabin at Aspen Ridge subdivision for 23 years. I have been
following the water problem with Island Park Water Company and have some ques�ons and concerns
about what is happening. In the years that we have owned our cabin, there have been only a few �mes
(3) that I can remember that boil water orders were issued. When this happened, there were signs
posted at all the main loops streets and one �me had a personal no�ce on my door. These were usually
posted due to some construc�on project where some contractor broke the line or was hooking up a new
cabin.
There have been only three �mes that we have had water line freeze-ups and that was in the
spring. There are plas�c pipes in the ground and really no way to thaw them un�l the weather warms
up. While this is definitely an inconvenience, it was not something we could not deal with. We have
other experiences with cabins we have used and had the same problems and these cabins had their own
wells. While I understand it is a major problem for the Short-Term Rentals it should be somewhat
expected when you are in the high mountain loca�ons. There was also cable line construc�on done last
summer that cut across the roads in several places. Every �me the soil is disturbed it allows more
moisture to pass through it and increases the poten�al for a line to freeze. It is s�ll evident this summer
when walking down the roads in the morning the cross cuts are visible from the extra moisture.
As to the fines from the DEQ, I feel they are quite extreme for the problems that we have
experienced. The informa�on I have read says that Island Park Water has about 300 customers. Our
fees are only $280.00 per year. That would only come to about $85,000 per year income if everyone
paid. IPW is being fined $435,000.00. This would take over five years just to pay the fines without
paying any of the cost to run the water system. This is not a really high- income business for anyone.
It has been projected that to bring the system up to DEQ standards, it would cost over 5 million dollars
and that our water rates would be $200.00 per month. For the service IPW provides, $280 per year is a
great deal. It also is not fair to the family cabin owners who only use their cabin a few months out of the
year compared to the Short-term rentals that are in use 10 months or more with usually more people
than just a family and yet pay the same price. The water system was designed for family cabins, not he
business of short-term rentals. If the upgrade is put in place, it may force some family cabins out or
make them also become a rental. The other op�on would be for everyone to have to put in their own
private well. Would three hundred new wells in our area be a good idea? A well would also cost each
cabin owner $25,000 to $30,000 dollars to drill with no assurance the well may be usable. I know of one
cabin that drilled a well last year and the water was not useable. A community system is a much beter
way for everyone.
It has also been proposed that maybe some big business would buy out the Island Park Water
Company. I don’t think there are very many businesses would be interested in buying the system with a
5 million dollar plus investment and even with the $200.00 a month fee. It would take 7 years to pay it
off with no interest or opera�ng costs.
The DEQ has seemed to me to have some type of agenda, something to prove or a vendeta against
Island Park Water Company instead of being willing to help them out. First of all was the water line
freeze up for some cabins. In reality, how does one find a frozen line under three to four feet of snow
2
and frozen ground? I am sure if there was a way, IPWC would have gladly fixed the problem. Then the
same thing with a water line leak on one street. How does one locate a leak under snow and frozen
ground? Leaks are difficult enough to find in the summer.
The next major problem was with E.coli: contamina�on on one street at Aspen Ridge. A boil order was
placed on all of the subdivisions that IPW supplies water. This was ques�onable to me as each the other
sites have their own wells and piping systems. One is about four miles north of Aspen Ridge and the
other subdivisions are 10 to 15 miles away from Aspen Ridge. Was there any E.coli: present in their
systems? Was there any test preformed? I am not aware of anything sta�ng if this was done ore not. If
there is E.coli: present in each of these systems, then most private wells should also be contaminated.
In one of the DEQ statements it showed pictures of IPW noncompliance with water lines being above
the ground. These pictures were of one inch poly and were not any part of the IPW system. The DEQ
have made several other statements which I feel are very ques�onable and could be challenged. Here
again, rather than being helpful, they are just proposing fines for their findings. One must ques�on
what the ul�mate goal is. If the goal is for clean, reliable, affordable water, why are the residents
receiving emails boas�ng of “Our lawsuit is nasty and backed by the governor s office and filed by the
atorney general”, but litle or nothing is discussed in terms of solu�ons nor evidence of con�nued
issues or comprehensive tes�ng.
From the informa�on I have received from several cabin owners, not all streets on Aspen Ridge have
tested posi�ve for E. coli. The water from the well has been tested and is clear of any E. coli
bacteria. Maybe the problem is just on the one street and could actually be from some cabin owner’s
system and not the IPW system. I have requested reports from the DEQ as to where and when water
samples were taken and what results were found but have not yet been informed. I have also offered
my water hydrant as a test site as it is close to the end of the water system to the west of the wells.
Overall, I feel that there is quite a bit of unfair treatment being given to IPW over these problems. The
water system has been quite reliable over the years we have been there, and I have had numerous guest
comment on the quality of our water. The price of IPW water is more than reasonable for the service
provided. I understand the Short-Term rentals posi�on that this is detrimental to their business, but the
system was built just for family cabins. When we bought our property, we were told STR’s were not
permited, but evidently that was not true. It is also not fair to family cabin owners who just have a
cabin to share with their family to pay the same amount for water as the Short-Term rentals who use
more water and for a longer period of �me. I feel most of the problem has ballooned because of the
Short-Term rentals and the involvement of the DEQ. I know we all want clean, dependable and
affordable water. I also know that IPW would like to supply and maintain an affordable system, but the
fines and demands from the DEQ will definitely not help any of the cabin owners out in the long run.