20060125Comment.pdf

j ~~~ro'
i s JV-IJ'Jean Jewell
:,
t-t
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ed Howell
Monday, January 23, 2006 1 :21 PM
Jean Jewell; Ed Howell; Gene Fadness; Tonya Clark
Comment acknowledgement
WNW Form Submission:
Monday, January 23, 2006
1:20:46 PM
Case: FLS-W-05-01
Name: Bill Serrano
Street Address: 490 N 4154 E
City: Rigby
State: 10
ZIP: 83442
Home Telephone: [phone]
E-MaIl: serrbill~hotmail. com
Company:
mailing list yes no: no
Comment descriptIon: If a resident's water use is metered then why is the residentcharged- a flat rate instead of a use rate? The rate hike states metered residential will
increase from $14.96 to $24.64 per month. Therefore, a resident that waters a ten-squarefoot lawn pays the same as the resident that waters a 10,000 square foot lawn and bothexamples can water 24-hours per day if they choose without increased costs since they are
charged a flat rate. This results in wasted water. I do not understand a flat rate formetered anything.
Transaction 10: 1231320.
Referred by: http: I Iwww.puc. state. id. usl scripts/polyform. dll/ipucUser Address: 70.56.147.220User Hostname: 70.56.147.220