20051011Comments.pdf

J/uA-'
)0/11 /6'-
y/~
lW\-V'fI/I/J/()
(/I'
;,
IJt
Page 1 of 1
Jean Jewell
From: SANDY GEBHARD (sandygebhard~cableone.net)
Sent: Friday, October 07 2005 5:22 PMTo: Jean Jewell
Subject: Case No. EAG-05-
Jean Jewell
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
Jean
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-05-
I am a resident of Eagle Springs Estates Subdivision and experienced severe reduction ln water pressure during
the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-
inch mainline. I am concerned that the improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the 122
customers of the Shadow Ridge and Shadow View Subdivisions are added to the water system , we will again
experience pressure reduction, due to our higher elevation, It is also quite likely that future developments along
Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road will exacerbate this problem.
I am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional booster for Big Springs Blvd. is
essential to ensure adequate water pressure, even if option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it seems Eagle Water
intends to assess that cost to just the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing
water service to Eagle Springs, the engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that were planned in
this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious that the project was improperly engineered
and planned by Eagle Water. It is inappropriate and unfair to penalize 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle
Water to properly plan and engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (the additional booster pump)
should be paid for by the entity that caused the problem, Eagle Water.
In addition, In July 2000 when Eagle Water had problems servicing Eagle Springs Estates, they were planning an
additional well and foothills reservoir. Has the commission been following the progress of those remedies as
stated in Case No, EAG-00-, Order No. 28513 dated September 25 , 2000? I have not heard of any reservoir
or well being planned,
Now that there are problems again (low pressure), we are hearing of the new well again. It would seem that when
a water company knows it's bringing another 122 homes onto the an already stressed system, the situation would
have been dealt with before the new subdivisions were approved. At the very least a study should have been well
under way or completed by this time, not another 3-5 months off to be completed as stated in the notice.
I am very concerned about how this matter will be resolved this time. It seems Eagle Water is only doing the bare
minimum to meet minimum requirements without any consideration for the future.
Your careful consideration in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
John and Sandra Gebhard
1041 0 N. Sage Hollow Way
Boise, Id 83714
10/11/2005
'1"-\1', P
\~-
t.l C ~-
October 5, 2005 1 FD
~".-
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-05-2. -&~'--~ o.,t~J I~dso
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainline l I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system, we will again experience
pressure reduction, due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hilt Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
1' 1 ~Jf1 8: Jt,,~ 1
\ LJ ilU F~~~~1\f ,
, '--"'-
l,;:)SlO.,JT\L\.~\t:_j\i
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure, EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs , the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is inappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I wi II appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
~~~-
Signature /.
tV r1;t.TE~ It! 11/1#/'1
Name (Pri nted)
/tJy?fi' ~LA//U$I1'd~5& fJ)
Address
cff
~J711
,r-1\lrLt;'fLL
October 7, 2005
", !-
~ Q. I") J .
n\"l' 1 \ fW"! 0"-\4
l,J Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
' \"
T~J -
~~"
SI083720li!;_-flIIII. ox 'J i l-\ \ 11....
'-' ,--_
J -'
Boise, Idaho
As a home owner in the Eagle Springs subdivision I would like to have the
commission understand that prior to purchasing, no information was forthcoming about
any water problems. After my move-in which was very near the completion of the
development I was informed of the installation of booster pump. Additional
information told to me was the builders had been advised by Eagle Water Co. that a small
pressure pump should be installed at each dwelling! This may be hear say for I have seen
no paper work concerning same. However if the pressure pump suggestion was a valid
statement, it would appear there were substantial doubts on the part of the Water Co. as to
their ability to maintain proper pressures. It is my understanding that Harris Homes, LLC
paid for the Mn. Booster Pmp. installation as a condition with Eagle Water as a solution
for the problem. All that the Home Owners knew was that water pressure was low.
Eagle Water Co. contends there is enough water to supply the subdivision, but
that the elevation is the factor preventing adequate pressure.
Another alarming situation to Eagle Springs is If we cannot get enough pressure
for this subdivision, What will the pressure be upon completion of the new subdivision
presently under construction on the west side of Horseshoe Bend Road adjacent to Eagle
Springs? Knowing full well that these systems were engineered, where lies the fault?
And is the engineering for the new subdivision acknowledging the problems presently
being experienced at Eagle Springs?
Suggested Options and Considerations
Option # Increase current booster
p p
ower.
I consider the a quick fix that mayor maynot solve the problem.
tion #2 Install an additional booster pump.
This could be a viable solution if the additional pump is located
parallel with the existing pump. The locating of the pumps in this manner would
provide a back-up system allowing for the overhaul of one pump without total
loss of water to the subdivision. Know it now-- These Booster Pumps will indeed
Fail sometime!
/Jif
Con
tion #2 Install an additional booster pump.
If the additional pump is to be placed in series with the current
pump, I feel we would gain very little benefit in regards to pressure. Two pumps
of the same size placed in series will have little or no effect. If the additional pump is of
a higher stage capacity, this would increase the pressure. But then again tell me what
happens when one pump fails.
,Ij
71p
Option #3 Drill a new well!
This is indeed a very good option in as much as Eagle Water Co. is
going to have to supply water to more that Eagle Springs. I fact with a new well on line
we will see a defInite increase in line pressure throughout the Eagle City water system
baring the use of isolation valves used to separate sections of the system. If a well is
drilled for the purpose of increasing Eagle Springs pressure, what devices will be
installed to maintain a specific pressure? What is the total area presumed to be served by
this proposed well.
I can t see how it could be expected for the home owners to absorb the cost of any of this
in view of what has gone on in the past. It's time EagleWater Co had a rate increase!
Respectfully.
Walter N. Hamm
10478 N. Cayuse Way
Boise, Idaho 83714
ITEM
Replace 8-inch line
Prepare Engineering Report
Legal & Accounting Expenses
TOT AL
COST
$ 40,027
$ 79 895
7 ~250
$127 172
Eagle Water stated that it will take between three to five months to complete the engineering
report. Exh. 4, p. 5.
A. Additional Low Pressure Measures
YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that although the Company believes that it has
adequately addressed the inunediate lo\\'pressure problems in Eagle Springs~ it is concerned that
there may be occasional drops in water pressure, "especially in light of the continued wasting of
water that has been observed in Eagle Springs.H Surcharge Application at 2. The Company
engineer has identified three additional measures which may "further alleviate water pressure
problems in the Eagle Springs area." These additional measures are:
Option 1 - Increase the power of the current booster pump from 60
horsepower (HP) to 75 or 100 HP. The estimated cost of this option is
$87 075.
Option 2 -Install an additional booster pump buried under Big Springs Street
at the 2,700-foot elevation. The estimated cost of this option is $81,607.50 or
approximately $1,600 per customer for the 51 customers at the highest
elevation in Eagle Springs.
Option 3 - Drill a new well under an existing permit from IDWR to serve the
entire systenl. The estimated cost of this option is $390 305. The Company
has an existing pennit to drill this well but expires on March 1 , 2006.
The Company estimated that Option 1 and Option 2 would take approximately six weeks
implement. Option 3 would take 60 to 180 days. ld. at 4-5. The Company s preference is for
the Commission to authorize Option 3 (the ne\v well).
YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that the Company asserted that based upon DEQ
criteria for estimating peak hourly demand, the peak demand for Eagle \Vater is approxiInately
OOO gal1ons per minute (gpn1). In addition to this normal peak demand , the Company
n1aintained that fire-flow requirements for public safety are an additional 1 500 gpm. Using the
DEQ standards, the Company estimated its system peak demand could exceed 3,500 gpm. Jd.
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
NOTICE OF PUBLJC
WORKSHOP AND HEARING
ORDER NO. 29870
""""-
'r'
- j
L. 'c. '-' L I v
October5n ;roP5
", ~~ ~
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise , ID 83720-0074
1 0
ZUD5 OCT
\ \
t~t;'0: j u
;: ;\0 PUBLiC
,,~,.
, J'~'I""'('l
"'" ("-?'-""'",
\UnU\\L\\;\:.:)tliiI Jv
wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainhne l I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I bel'ieve that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction , due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wit, exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure , EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However , it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs , the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is it1a~riate and unfair to
---.._-
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I will appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
.""
Name (Printed)
()~
~tJ
Address
, i, f'r:- i \J
October 5 2~v,
, "
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Uti lities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
'" ~
1 I ?J 8: ?::;
tn.,! i \ h. '
U HO 'P~B L!C "
,- ,
r'r~rf\,'Ai"1!SStO"1~j!nJ\\r:.) ~J Ultj
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainlinel I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system, we will again experience
pressure reduction , due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hilt Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure , EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water c,ommitted to providing water
service to Eagle Springs, the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is it1appropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I wi II appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
AA~ 1dVw~
ilW JJ f- 4-f/?EJJ blul11J
ioP;:;d) JJ.
~ M !Io! I Otu- Lv 1+ WI;
Address
"""
J~L,tl"f
October 5 , 2005 Fn
: ,; ,..,- :"'
,, h,."
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
I- I t1 t~' Q
' '' .
WOS OCT t f"\n 0' ~ t
, , : ; (--
, D' 0 G:I ,
. . ,,;: .
' o'! !v
; ~' ,-~ :,
u : ~~ 7!'r""
"""'; '
r:',;;\L-
(;:\:,;)
did 'J
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainline, I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction , due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hilt Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure, EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springsl the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivi'sion in this manner. It is if1appropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Ea9~e Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I will appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
Signature
f1 JIU (YlJ1Zt2"
,?~~~)
S~ /.lDl/rJAJ
Address
~i~
, ;" \,
' C. "
October 5 , 2005;; --. :LLU
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
'"
~- f I';, R:: ~ I I E. v ,
JT \ L.
\ .
' (E
~~;
J d!
~;i,fi,\l~ SIGN
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG- W-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch maintine l I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction, due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure, EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs , the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is inappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I will appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
5 ig n,9!.u.reHUr
Name CPr i nted)/0'530 Sf\6FE-
Address
cA
1-/0 floLD BOlS~ JJJ
CO3f7/ y:
~" '' '
1- " l:. L, i:. I V
'.:~ '
October ~;l-t?~05
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise , ID 83720-0074
1'"'1" f , (3: t 9l; . t fJ
J T j L. \, j r:: ~ri
~;~
~l~SJOr1
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG- W-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainline , I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction I due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road witt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure, EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springsl the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is inappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engi neer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I will appreciate your carefui consideration of my concerns in these matters.
~~&r
Vl t
- ~
it 1 It? J Y7 flfJ~Address
731
, C E ! V A~-~
.. \jIt~:-
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
OCT It AI'~ 8: I
! ,)/'
;'j() F' UBLJC
/ ;
1 ! T \ F c~ 1-: !'fl ~'A c: C! 0 ~
:' ! ...,-, , ,;,.-- ,
\J ! I j J J
-! "' j "
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainlinel I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along HiU Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure, EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs, the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is inappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I wi II appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
Signature
0 4J f\./
Name CPr inted)770C
Address
') 5prl n ~ 5 B)/.--! e 15J
FC,:EIVEOOctober 5 2005;;'
~-~, '
" : t.
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
OCT 1 tltll 8: t
JTlil inmJ d~~~~i tS1ON
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch maintinel I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system , we will again experience
pressure reduction , due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressure , EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However , it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Sprjngs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs, the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is inappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I will appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
signature
..., 'of A -
Name (Printed)
'(J 5J-c; IC/-
&(3 8:3Address
,,- ,
'- n
;--, ,..,- (,
I ~
" -
October 5 2~_
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise , ID 83720-0074
5 flCT t \ tlr"1 8: I m
.,,
" t'
; ;('
;: r UOL-i'
, ,--= .--,
' t.
- "'" '. "-- "\/" " '
J;\L1ilc::) Lurlill
I wish to submit comments on Case No. EAG-O5-
am a resident of Eagle Springs subdivision and experienced severe reduction in water
pressure during the summer. Although the situation has improved since the replacement
of the 8-inch mainline with the larger 12-inch mainline l I am concerned that the
improvement will only be temporary. I believe that when the large number of customers
in the Shadow Ridge subdivision are added to the water system, we will again experience
pressure reduction l due to the difference in elevation. It is also quite likely that future
developments along Hill Road and Horseshoe Bend Road wilt exacerbate this problem.
am also very concerned about the proposal for Option 2. I believe the additional
booster for Big Springs Boulevard is essential to ensure adequate water pressurel EVEN
IF Option 1 or 3 is approved. However, it is not appropriate to assess that cost to just
the 51 customers in Eagle Springs. When Eagle Water committed to providing water
service to Eagle Springs, the Engineering staff knew the number and type of homes that
were planned in this area. They also knew of the elevation difference. It is obvious
that the project was improperly engineered and planned. The engineers/planners
further contributed to the potential for pressure problems by installing only one branch
from the main line to be shared by two homes. I understand that Eagle Water installed
all water service in the subdivision in this manner. It is iflappropriate and unfair to
penalize the 51 homeowners for the failure of Eagle Water to properly plan and
engineer this project. The cost of corrective action (additional booster pump) should be
paid by the entity that caused the problem-Eagle Water.
I wi II appreciate your careful consideration of my concerns in these matters.
i~~
Signature
~~\\ ~
\ ~ \:)4 SM \'4---~
Name CPr i nted) I \IO?ll 0. Skf \+0 \\ ow
Address DO \ 0~ ,~-:S/J'i