HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160108Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM 1
DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER RAPER
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
LEGAL
FROM: DAPHNE HUANG
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
DATE: JANUARY 7, 2016
SUBJECT: DIAMOND BAR ESTATES WATER COMPANY’S APPLICATION TO
INCREASE RATES AND CHARGES, CASE NO. DIA-W-15-01
On December 28, 2015, Diamond Bar Estates Water Company filed a general rate case
Application to increase its rates and charges for water service, effective February 1, 2016. Diamond
provides water service to 44 customers in the Diamond Bar Estates and Boekel Estates Subdivisions in
Kootenai County, Idaho, per a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity granted by this
Commission in 2003, and as expanded in 2004. See Order Nos. 29247, 29556.
The Company proposes to increase its rates by 79.39%, which if approved, would produce
about $20,910 more in annual revenue than the prior year. Application at 1. Diamond notes that it has
not had a rate increase since October 2007, when the Commission issued Order No. 30455. Id. The
Company also proposes to increase its new customer, meter installation fee from $310 to $475. Id.
THE APPLICATION
Diamond’s proposed rate increases include raising the monthly minimum rate from $29.00
for the first 5,500 gallons of water to $52.02 per month, and raising the commodity rate for usage
above 5,500 gallons per month from $0.80 per 1,000 gallons (above the initial 5,500 gallons) to $1.44
per 1,000 gallons. Proposed Amended Tariff. Diamond proposes a rate base of $40,398, reflecting
accumulated depreciation of $12,669, but also including a working capital allowance of $4,679 – or
1/8 of the Company’s operation and maintenance expenses. Id. at 1-2; Exh. 1.
According to Diamond, the Company has been operating at a loss, and the proposed
increases, if approved, would enable it to recover various expenses. Application at 2. The biggest
expense that Diamond seeks to recover is for costs incurred from multiple pump failures during 2015.
DECISION MEMORANDUM 2
Id. The Company also asks to recover costs of “bookkeeping and customer-service related services,”
and recovery for expenses from “water testing, meter reading, pump service and on-call duties.” Id.;
Exh. 2. In addition, the Company seeks to recover rate case expenses for this filing, and the cost of
electricity to run its pumps. Id.
With its Application, the Company submitted proposed notices to include with customer
bills, and to be published in local newspapers. Id. at 3; Exh. 5. The Company is working with Staff to
ensure its notices include all required information, and are published to all required media, per Rule
125, IDAPA 31.01.01.125.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff has filed two production requests. To ensure adequate time to receive and examine
discovery, and to conduct an audit of relevant records, Staff recommends that the Commission suspend
the proposed effective date of February 1, 2016, until July l, 2016. Staff recommends that this case be
processed by Modified Procedure, with a comment deadline of May 18, 2016, and deadline for
optional reply of June 1, 2016. Although Idaho Code § 61-622 permits suspension of the effective
date for 30 days and five months – or until August 1, 2016 – Staff believes an effective date of July 1,
2016, allows sufficient time to present a complete record for the Commission’s review. Finally, Staff
recommends that a public workshop be held in the Company’s service area per Rule 127, and that the
Commission conduct a public customer hearing – both at dates, times, and locations to be determined
later.
COMMISSION DECISION
1. Does the Commission wish to issue a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified
Procedure with a May 18, 2016, deadline for comments, and deadline for optional reply of June 1,
2016?
2. Does the Commission wish to suspend the Company’s proposed effective date of
February 1, 2016, per Idaho Code § 61-622, and set an effective date of July 1, 2016?
3. Does the Commission wish to schedule a public workshop and public customer hearing
in a later Order?
/s/ Daphne Huang
Daphne Huang
Deputy Attorney General
M:DIA-W-15-01_djh