Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050628_1246.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER CO MMISSI 0 NER SMITH CO MMISSI 0 NER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:GRACE SEAMAN DATE:JUNE 24, 2005 RE:STAFF REVIEW OF INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENTS; CASE NOS. QWE- T -04-9 AND CTC- T -05- BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 V.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (1) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 V.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS The Commission has been asked to approve one amendment to an existing interconnection agreement and one new interconnection agreement. The items are discussed in greater detail below. 1. Qwest Corporation and AT&T Communications of the Mountain States. Inc. In this case, the parties request approval of an amendment to an existing agreement approved by the Commission on June 22, 2004. This amendment incorporates Expedites for Design Services. 2. Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho (CTC-Idaho) and IDACOMM Inc In this Application, the parties request Commission approval of an interconnection agreement. This agreement provides for the limited interconnection ofIDACOMM, Inc. with CTC-Idaho for Local and EAS Service. DECISION MEMORANDUM JUNE 24, 2005 ST AFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the Applications and does not find that any terms or conditions are discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Accordingly, Staff recommends Commission approval of the agreements. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to approve the new Application for interconnection and the amendment to the existing agreement? Grace Seaman i:udmemos/qwetO4.9 _ctctO5. DECISION MEMORANDUM JUNE 24, 2005