20100107Additional Comment.pdf

~yf it1¡lllvlJO'~v1ò v~.
:. H
Jean Jewell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
kris (kristinemetcalf(§yahoo.com)
Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10: 13 AM
Jean Jewell
Re: Your Comments Regarding Case No. BCS-W-09-02
I would also like to state that the report that was sent to me is in error. It states on page four that the Staffs rate
base of pay was uncontested. That is not tre as I gave testimony at the public hearg in Rathdr, to oppose
the signficant pay raises to the staff and their excessive fees.
--- On Tue, 1/5110, Jean Jewe1l4ean.Jewell(ipuc.idaho.gov~ wrote:
From: Jean Jewell ':Jean.JewellØ)puc.idaho.gov~
Subject: Your Comments Regarding Case No. BCS- W -09-02
To: KrstinemetcalfØ)yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2010,3:51 PM
Dear Ms. Metcalf:
Than you for your comments regarding Case No. BCS-W-09-02 - In the
Matter of the Application of Bar Circle "S" Water Company for Authority
to Increase Rates and Charges for Water Service. The Idaho Public
Utilities Commission appreciates your input and interest in this case.
Your comments have been directed to the Commissioners and staff for
their review.
Thans again for taing the time to share your thoughts with us.
Sincerely,
Jean Jewell
Commission Secretar