Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170317Petition for Funding.pdfBenjamin Otto (ISB No. 8292) 710 N 6ft Street Boise,ID 83701 Ph: (208) 345-6933x12 Fax: (208) 344-0344 botto @idahoconservation. org Attorney for the Idaho Conservation League IN THE MATTER OF THE ) APPLTCATTON OF ) INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPAI\'Y ) FOR THE AUTHORTTY TO ) CHANGE ITS RATES AND ) CHARGES FORNAUTRAL GAS ) SERYICE TO NATURAL GAS ) cusroMERS rN THE STATE OF ) IDAHO it r{,::lvED ;:il ;, iil i I Pll 12: 00 ,r,\'\rr.rl:r:-,.-,itl;.i BEFORT THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. INT.G.16.O2 IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE AND NW ENERGY COALTION APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING COMES NOW, the Idaho Conservation League ("ICL") and the NW Energy Coalition ('NWEC)", pursuant to Idaho Code $ 6l-617A and IDAPA 31.01.01.161-165 with the following application for intervenor funding. ICL and NWEC are intervenors in this case pursuant to Order No. 3361l. This application is timely pursuant to the Commissions instruction at the technical hearing to submit such applications by March 17,2017. I.Idaho Code S 61-617A and IDAPA Rule 31.01.01.161. Requirement Intermountain Gas Company is a regulated public utility with gross Idaho intrastate, annual revenues exceeding three million, five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000.00). II. IDAPA Rule 31.01.01.162 Requirements l.Itemized list of Expenses The attached Exhibit A includes an itemized list of expenses incurred by ICL and NWEC ICLAIWEC Application for Intervenor Funding INT-G-16-02 I March 17,2017 for Mr. Rivas travel costs to attend the technical hearing. Exhibit A also indicates the hours spent investigating the direct testimony of Intermountain Gas, reviewing the direct and rebuttal testimony of other parties, preparing for cross examination of witnesses, and participating in the hearing. ICL and NWEC incurred, but are not seeking recovery of, additional expenses for printing and reproduction. 2. Statement of Proposed Findings ICL and NWEC propose the Commission: a Approve Intermountain Gas Company's proposed conservation programs with Staff s proposed adjustments Delay Intermountain's proposed Fixed Cost Collection Mechanism until the company increases conservation achievements; adopt ICL and NWEC changes to the mechanism Order Intermountain Gas to convene an Energy Efficiency Advisory Group and rapidly pursue additional co st-effective conservation pro grams Set the customer charge for the Residential class at $3.50 per month and the General Service class at $10 per month, along with adjusting the per therm charge accordingly to achieve the class revenue requirement Reject the proposed fourth block for the General Service class; change to inverted block per therm rates Grant this request for intervenor funding a a a a a 3. Statement Showing Costs ICL and NWEC requests $5,678.00 in intervenor funding, as shown in Exhibit A and rounded down for ease of accounting. Both the hourly rate and hours expended are reasonable ICLA{WEC Application for Intervenor Funding INT-G-16-02 2 March 17,2017 for this complex case and in line with the current range for other intervening parties in Idaho. As the first general rate case filed by Intermountain Gas in 31 years, this case presented a host of new issues and information to review andanalyze. ICL and NWEC reviewed the direct testimony of Intermountain, the extensive discovery requests of other parties, and submitted our own. We filed Direct Testimony of Diego Rivas addressing the proposed gas conservation programs, the Fixed Cost Collection Mechanism, and rate design for the Residential and General Service classes. Council for ICL was an active participant in the technical hearing on these issues as well as others concerning all customers. For each of these efforts we endeavored to limit the number of hours expended to the maximum extent possible, primarily by focusing on issues relevant to our constituents, and only seek recovery for a fraction of the total hours spent. We request a reasonable hourly rate for both counsel and Mr. Rivas that is well below market rates for equivalent levels ofexperience. For all these reasons our request is reasonable. 4. Explanation of Cost Statement ICL and NWEC are both nonprofit organizations supported solely through charitable donations from our members and foundations. In this proceeding, we represent our members and supporters who are ratepayers of Intermountain Gas. To provide consistent, professional, and impactful advocacy for our members and supporters both ICL and NWEC dedicated full-time, highly trained staff members to work solely on energy issues. The cost of employing and training these employees is a significant financial commitment for a charitable organization. Mr. Otto and Mr. Rivas have complementary skills and rolls, each of which is necessary to effectively advocate for our constituents. Because charitable contributions are inherently unstable, the availability of intervener funding is essential for ICL and NWEC to participate in these proceedings. Our groups have no pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case; rather we ICLAIWEC Application for Intervenor Funding rNT-G-16-02 J March 17,2017 dedicated our time and resources to represent the interests of our 25,000 supporters around the state who have a strong interest in conserving natural gas while keeping bills affordable in Idaho. 5. Statement of Difference ICL and NWEC's proposed findings are materially different than the Staff. Staff criticized the depth and breadth of Intermountain's gas conservation portfolio and recommended further assessment as part of the 20l9Integrated Resource Plan cycle. Because we believe additional cost effective conservation potential exists today, ICL and NWEC's testimony and cross-examination at hearing argued for the Commission to order Intermountain to begin developing additional cost effective programs immediately. Our testimony suggests specific additional conservation measures including Exhibit 401 showing additional conservation programs currently offered by Intermountain sister company Cascade Natural Gas. Staff did not provide evidence of specific additional measures for the Company to consider. In sum, ICL and NWEC's position is for a much faster and deeper development of cost effective conservation than the Staff advocated for. ICL and NWEC criticized the Intermountain's fixed cost collection mechanism, along with Staff. ICL and NWEC went beyond Staff testimony to include specific recommendations to improve the mechanism including capping rate increases, removing the per month reconciliation, and excluding the 50 largest General Service customers. On rate design, ICL and NWEC recommendations differ from Staff by proposing a much lower customer charge for the residential class and, for the General Service class, opposing adding a fourth block and maintaining a declining block structure. We further illuminated these material differences in rate design at the hearing. In sum, ICL and NWEC differed from Staff by proposing improvements to, not just denial of, the Fixed Cost Collection Mechanism and a different rate components for ICLAIWEC Application for Intervenor Funding INT-G-16-02 4 March 17,2017 both the Residential and General Service classes 6. Statement of Recommendation All customers, regardless of class, share a strong interest in ensuring Idaho utilities spend customer funds prudently, particularly here in regards to gas conservation programs, and collect funds fairly, here through rate design. By engaging on these issues, tCL and NWEC address matters of concern to all customers. Clearly, rate design affects all members of the class and, to the extent rate design impacts overall revenue collection, rate design in one class is a matter of concern for all ratepayers. Gas conservation programs have the ability to affect all customers by avoiding higher cost supply-side options, as well as subgroups that are eligible to participate in conservation incentives. Rate mechanisms like the Fixed Cost Collection Mechanism can also affect all customers by reducing revenue volatility for the Company. Our organizations do not have a monetary interest in the results of this case; rather our participation is to be a voice for Intermountain Gas customers who desire to conserve gas while keeping bills affordable. 7. Statement Showing Class of Customer Our individual members and supporters are predominately residential and with a few small commercial customers of Intermountain Gas. WHEREFORE,ICL and NWEC respectfully requests the Commission grant this application. DATED this 17th dayof March}}l7. submitted, -z^e>< Benjamin I. Otto Idaho Conservation League ICLA{WEC Application for Intervenor Funding INT-G-16-02 5 March 17,2017 Exhibit A Cost Statement for Idaho Conservation League and NW Enerry Coalition Investigating Intermountain Gas Company's application and direct testimony Benjamin J Otto (Council): 1.25 hours Diego Rivas (Witness): 3.25 hours Reviewing relevant discovery by all parties, drafting ICLAIWEC discovery Benjamin J Otto (Council): 2.25 hours Diego Rivas (Witness): 3.75 hours Preparing and filing the direct testimony of Mr. Rivas Benjamin J Otto (Council): 3.25 hours Diego Rivas (Witness): 6.25 hours Reviewing the direct and rebuttal testimony of other parties, prepare cross Benjamin J Otto (Council): 3.25 hours Diego Rivas (Witness): 2.75 hours Participating in the technical hearing of March I - 3 Benjamin J Otto (Council): 16 hours Diego Rivas (Witness): 10 hours Total Hours Benjamin J Otto (Council): Diego Rivas (Witness): 26 hours @ $l35ftrour 26 hours @ $50/hour $3,510.00 $1,300.00 $t23.r7 $74s.10 Total: $5.678.27 Expenses Travel for Diego Rivas Lodging: Boise Guest House Flight: Delta, Helena, MT to Boise,ID ICLA{WEC Application for Intervenor Funding INT-G-16-02 6 March 17,2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 17th day of March20l7 I delivered true and correct copies of the foregoing APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING to the following persons via the method of service noted: Benjamin J. Otto Hand delivery: Jean Jewell Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 427 W. Washington St. Boise, ID 83702-5983 (Original,3 copies) Electronic Mail Only: INTERMOUNTAIN GAS Ronald L. Williams Williams Bradbury, PC 1015 W. Hays Street Boise, ID 83702 Phone: (205) 344-6633 ron@williamsbradbury. com Michael P. McGrath Director - Regulatory Affairs Intermountain Gas Company 55 S. Cole Road PO Box 7608 Boise,ID 83707 Phone: (205) 377-6168 mike.mcgrath@intergas.com COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO Brad M Purdy Attorney at Law 2019 N. 17'h St. Boise, ID 83702 Phone: (205) 384-1229 bmpurdy@hotmail.com NORTHWEST INDUSTRIAL GAS USERS c/o Edward A Finklea Executive Director 545 Grandview Drive Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: (541) 708-6338 efinklea@nwigu.org Chad M. Stokes TommyA Brooks Cable Huston LLP 1001 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97204-1136 Phone: (503)224-3092 cstokes@cablehuston.com tbrooks@cablehuston. com Michael C. Creamer (ISB No.4030) Givens Pursley LLP 601 W Bannock St. Boise, ID 83702 Phone: (208) 388-1200 mcc@givenspursley.com THE AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO. LLC Peter fuchardson Gregory M. Adams Richardson Adams PLLC 5r5 N. 27ft st. Boise, lD 83702 peter@richardsonadams. com gr e g@richard s onadams. c om Scott Dale Blickenstaff The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC 1951 S. Saturn Way, Suite 100 Boise,ID 83709 sblickenstaff@amalsugar. com SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE Ken Miller Snake River Alliance 223 N.6th St. Suite 317 P.O. Box 1731 Boise,ID 83701 kmiller@snakeriveralliance. org FEDERAL EXECUTIVE AGENCIES Andrew J. Unsicker Lanny L.Zieman Natalie A. Cepak Thomas A. Jemigan Ebony M. Payton AFLOA/JA-ULFSC 139 Barnes Dr., Suite I Tyndall AFB, FL32403 Andrew.unsicker@us. af.mil Lanny.zieman. 1 @us.af.mil Natalie. cepak. 2 @us. af.mil Thomas j erni gan. 3 @us. af.mil Ebony.payton. ctr@us. af.mil