Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040217_752.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM:WELDON STUTZMAN DATE:FEBRUARY 12,2004 RE:PETITION BY IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION FOR A SUSPENSION OF NUMBER PORTABILITY REQUIREMENT; CASE NO. GNR- T -04- Section 251 (b) of the federal telecommunications act requires all local exchange carriers to provide number portability to the extent technically feasible and in accordance with requirements prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission.In an order issued November 10, 2003 , the FCC requires that incumbent LECs in areas outside the largest 100 metropolitan areas implement number portability no later than May 24 2004. Section 251(f)(2) allows local exchange carriers with fewer than 2% of the nations subscriber lines to petition a state commission for suspension or modification of the requirements of Section 251(b). On February 5 , 2004, a Petition was filed by the Idaho Telephone Association on behalf of 16 of its members requesting a six-month suspension of the requirement that they provide number portability from wireline to wireless carriers.The petition states that the member companies are pursuing an economically and technically feasible way to provide number portability, but that a system upgrade is required. Specifically, the companies propose to provide number portability through shared equipment and services provided by Syringa Networks, LLC, requiring that Syringa convert its switch to a tandem switch. The petition states that the conversion is already underway but that it cannot be completed prior to the May 24 2004, deadline. The ITA on behalf of the 16 companies asks the Commission to suspend their local number portability obligation for six months, until November 24, 2004, to enable Syringa to convert its switch and make the necessary conversion and upgrades. The petition asserts this DECISION MEMORANDUM solution will avoid significant adverse economic impact on users of telecommunication services and that the suspension is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. The ITA asks that its petition for a six-month suspension of number portability requirements be processed by Modified Procedure. Staff also recommends that the petition filed by IT A be processed by Modified Procedure. COMMISSION DECISION Should the Petition filed by ITA for a six-month suspenSIOn of local number portability requirements from wireline to wireless carriers be processed by Modified Procedure? Weldon Stutzman Vld/M:GNRTO401 DECISION MEMORANDUM