Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout28334.docBEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF TRANS NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S FAILURE TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONS 1999 REGULATORY FEE PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE §§ 61-1001 AND 62-611. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. GNR-U-00-3 ORDER NO. 28334 IN THE MATTER OF GROUP III SERVICES’ FAILURE TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONS 1999 REGULATORY FEE PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE §§ 61-1001 AND 62-611. ) ) ) ) ) IN THE MATTER OF WESTERN TELE-COMMUNICATIONS INC. DBA PEOPLE LINK BY TCI’S FAILURE TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONS 1999 REGULATORY FEE PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE §§ 61-1001 AND 62-611. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE MATTER OF CALL PLUS, INC.’S FAILURE TO REMIT THE COMMISSIONS 1999 REGULATORY FEE PURSUANT TO IDAHO CODE §§ 61-1001 AND 62-611. ) ) ) ) On January 28, 2000, the Commission issued Order No. 28266 directing Transnational Communications, Group III Services, Western Telecommunications dba PeopleLink by TCI, and Call Plus, to show cause why they have failed, refused or neglected to pay their 1999 regulatory fees as required by Idaho Code §§ 61-1005 and 62-611. The companies were ordered to appear before the Commission’s Hearing Officer on February 22, 2000. The companies failed to appear and the Hearing Officer entered default judgments against the four companies for failing to pay their 1999 regulatory fees to the Commission. Having reviewed the evidence presented at the show cause hearing and the Hearing Officer’s recommendations, we order these companies to cease conducting business in Idaho and that other Idaho LECs are directed to not carry the four companies’ telecommunications traffic. The four companies’ tariffs/price lists shall be cancelled and returned unless their delinquent regulatory fees are paid within 21 days of the service date of this Order. BACKGROUND The Commission’s Regulatory Fee Idaho Code §§ 61-1001 and 62-611 provide that each public utility subject to the Commission’s Title 61 or Title 62 jurisdiction shall pay to the Commission a special regulatory fee “to defray the amount to be expended by the commission for expenses in supervising and regulating the public utilities.” On or before April 1st of each year, each public utility is required to report its gross operating revenue from intrastate business in Idaho for the preceding calendar year. Idaho Code § 61-1003. Based upon all the utilities’ gross intrastate revenues and the Commission’s annual appropriation from the Legislature, the Commission then calculates the proportional assessment to be paid by each utility. Thereafter, each utility pays its regulatory assessment to the Commission in two equal semi-annual installments on or before May 15th and November 15th of each year. Idaho Code § 61-1005. “Upon failure, refusal or neglect of any public utility or railroad corporation to pay such fee the attorney general shall commence an action in the name of the state to collect the same.” Id. This section further provides that installments not paid in a timely fashion shall bear interest at the rate of 6% until such time as the full amount of the installment or annual fee is paid. Idaho Code § 61-1004(3) sets the minimum annual regulatory fee at $50.00. In this case, the Commission Staff alleged that although the four Title 62 companies reported their gross intrastate revenues and were assessed the minimum $50 regulatory fee, the companies failed to pay their 1999 regulatory fees. Order No. 28266. The Staff presented the prefile testimony of its Financial Support Technician, Christine Maschmann. She testified concerning the assessment procedures and the Staff’s efforts to collect the assessments. THE SHOW CAUSE HEARING A. Designating Persons to Receive Service and Mail Issued by the Commission Secretary Ms. Maschmann first testified that Idaho Code § 62-619 provides that the Commission’s Rules of Procedure apply to the processing of Title 62 matters. She also noted that the Commission’s Procedural Rule 16 provides that the Commission Secretary shall serve all Orders by mail. IDAPA 31.01.01.16.01. Tr. at 11. This Rule requires that all “utilities must maintain on file with the Commission Secretary a designation of such a person. Summonses and complaints directed to regulated utilities . . . may be served by registered or certified mail.” Tr. at 11-12 citing IDAPA 31.01.01.16.02. Staff witness Maschmann also testified that Title 62 Rule 202 requires that each Title 62 corporation provide the Commission with the “address of the principal place of business of the telephone corporation, and, if there is a principal place of business in Idaho, the address of the principal place of business in Idaho; [and an] agent in Idaho for service to process by the Commission in the state of Idaho.” IDAPA 31.42.01.202.02(b) and (c). Tr. at 10-11. She also noted that Rule 202.03 provides that “Orders and other documents issued by the Commission may be served by mail on the agent for service of process listed pursuant to Rule 202.01.(c) of this Rule. This service constitutes due and timely notice to the telephone corporation, and no further service is necessary to bind the corporation.” Tr. at 11 citing IDAPA 31.42.01.202.03. Idaho Code § 61-615 allows complaints against utilities to be served by registered mail. All the Orders and correspondence sent to the four companies in this case were sent to the addresses on file with the Commission. B. The Staff’s Efforts to Collect the Regulatory Fees On April 23, 1999, each of the four companies was mailed a statement of their 1999 annual assessment fees. Exhibit Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6 (Schedule A’s). This statement mentioned that the fee may be paid in two equal installments, the first due no later than May 15, 1999, and the second due no later than November 15, 1999. Tr. at 7, 15, 17, 19. When the May 1999 payments were not received, the Commission’s attorney forwarded a letter on September 9, 1999, to each company advising them that the Commission had not received the May installment and that each company owed $25.50. The letter further stated that each company “may remit the entire 1999 fee of $50.50 (including the calculated interest).” Exh. Nos. 3 (Sch. C); Exh. 4 (Sch. C); Exh. 5 (Sch. B); and Exh. 6 (Sch. B). Each company was further advised that failure to remit this amount may result in legal action including the assessment of a civil penalty up to $2,000 each day that the violation continued. Id. After not receiving any response to the September 9 letter, a subsequent letter was sent by certified mail from the Commission’s Attorney advising each company that the Commission had not received the first or second installment payment of the 1999 regulatory fee. The December letter advised each company that its 1999 regulatory fee (plus interest) was [then] $51.03 and must be paid no later than December 23, 1999 to avoid legal action for failure to pay the regulatory fee. In addition, each letter included a “tear-off” reply section so that the companies could advise the Commission if they were no longer conducting business in Idaho and could request that their tariffs/price lists be removed from the Commission’s files. Tr. at 13, 16, 17-18, 19-20; Exh. Nos. 3 (Sch. D), Exh. 4 (Sch. D); Exh. 5 (Sch. C); Exh. 6 (Sch. C). Staff witness Maschmann testified that the returned certified mail receipts for Transnational Communications and Western Telecommunications showed that the December letter was delivered to each company and signed for on December 16 & 15, 1999, respectively. Tr. at 14, 18. The mail receipts for the other two companies were returned by the post office as “unclaimed.” Tr. at 16, 20. Ms. Maschmann also stated that each company was served a copy of Show Cause Order No. 28266 by certified mail. The post office’s mail receipts show that Transnational and Western Telecommunications did receive copies of the Commission’s Show Cause Order. Tr. at 14, 18. The mail receipt for the other two companies show that the Order was returned as unclaimed. Tr. at 16, 20. None of the four companies appeared at the Show Cause hearing. Tr. at 83. Ms. Maschmann recommended that the Hearing Officer enter a default against these companies if they failed to pay their regulatory fee or appear at the Show Cause hearing. She further recommended that the Commission issue an Order finding that the companies are in default for failure to pay their regulatory fees and that the companies be ordered to cease operating in Idaho until they have come into compliance. In addition, she suggested that local exchange companies should be ordered to deny or prohibit the carriage of traffic for these companies. Finally, she recommended that if the companies failed to pay their delinquent regulatory fee, that their price lists be cancelled and returned. Tr. at 20-21. At the hearing, the Staff Attorney assured the Hearing Officer that the Staff had cross-checked the addresses on file at the Commission with those addresses maintained by the Secretary of State for the registration of corporations. Tr. at 82. He also noted that the December 10 letters sent by certified mail were also served on the agent for service at addresses both maintained by the Commission and the Secretary of State. Id. C. The Hearing Officer’s Recommendations Having reviewed the testimony filed by Staff witness Maschmann and her Exhibits, the Hearing Officer found that appropriate service had been attempted on all four companies and that mail service of the fee statement, collection letters, and the Show Cause Order were valid. Tr. at 83. He found that during the Show Cause hearing, no parties had appeared. Id. He also noted that it was appropriate to enter default judgments against Transnational Communications, Group III Services, Western Communications dba PeopleLink by TCI, and Call Plus for failure to pay their respective 1999 regulatory fees. Tr. at 84. He observed that all of the companies had failed to pay their minimum regulatory fee including interest to the time of the Show Cause hearing of $51.03. The Hearing Officer recommended and the Staff agreed that between the time of the hearing and the Commission taking this matter up at its decision meeting, that the Staff should consider entering into a consent agreement with any of the four companies if they offered to pay their fees. Tr. at 78-79, 88, 89. As of the date that this Order was prepared, none of the four companies had contacted the Staff regarding payment of their 1999 regulatory fees. COMMISSION FINDINGS Having reviewed the evidence presented at the Show Cause hearing and the Hearing Officer’s recommendations, we find that Transnational Communications, Group III Services, Western Telecommunications dba PeopleLink by TCI, and Call Plus have failed to pay their 1999 regulatory fees as required by Idaho Code §§ 61-1005 and 62-611. We find that the assessment letters, collection letters, and Order No. 28266 were properly served by regular mail and certified mail to the person(s) designated by these Title 62 companies to receive correspondence, summonses and Orders of the Public Utilities Commission. IDAPA 31.01.01.016; 31.42.01.202. The Commission has jurisdiction over these companies and this matter pursuant to Idaho Code § 62-611 and Chapter 10, Title 61, Idaho Code. Based upon the recommendation of our Hearing Officer, we further find that it is appropriate to enter default judgments against these companies for their failure to appear at the Show Cause hearing. IDAPA 31.01.01.301. It is unreasonable for these companies to be allowed to operate in Idaho without paying their regulatory fee. Failure to pay their regulatory fees unfairly burdens the remaining companies. Moreover, the companies’ failure to appear at the Show Cause hearing pursuant to an Order of this Commission calls into question the fitness to comply with the Public Utility Laws and administrative Rules of this Commission. It is evident from the testimony of our Financial Technician that considerable resources and Staff time were expended trying to collect the delinquent regulatory fees. Finally, we also believe it is reasonable that these companies be directed to cease operating in Idaho and that incumbent and competitive local exchange companies be ordered not to transmit any traffic for these companies. Given the failure of these four companies to pay their 1999 regulatory fee as required by law, we also believe it is appropriate to cancel their price lists and return them. Although we believe that these companies have been given ample opportunity to comply with the regulatory fee statutes, we believe it is appropriate for this Order to become effective 21 days from the service date of this Order. If prior to the effective date of this Order the companies come forward to pay their delinquent 1999 regulatory fees, we believe that it would be appropriate for the companies and the Commission Staff to enter into a consent agreement pursuant to Procedural Rule 58, IDAPA 31.01.01.58. As noted in the Rule, “[c]onsent agreements are intended to require compliance with existing law.” Id. O R D E R IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Transnational Communications, Group III Services, Western Telecommunications dba PeopleLink by TCI, and Call Plus are in default for failure to pay their 1999 regulatory fees pursuant to Idaho Code §§ 61-1001, 61-1005, and 62-611. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall become effective 21 days from the service date of this Order. When this Order becomes effective these companies shall cease operating in Idaho. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 25 days after the service date of this Order, that incumbent and competitive local exchange companies shall no longer originate or terminate intrastate traffic for these companies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the effective date of this Order the tariffs and price lists for these companies shall be canceled and returned to them for failure to pay their 1999 regulatory fees. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this Case No. GNR-U-00-3 may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this order or in interlocutory Orders previously issued in this Case No. GNR-U-00-3. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code § 61-626. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this day of April 2000. DENNIS S. HANSEN, PRESIDENT MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER PAUL KJELLANDER, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: Myrna J. Walters Commission Secretary vld/O:GNR-U-00-3_dh2 ORDER NO. 28334 1 Office of the Secretary Service Date April 11, 2000