Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170817Settlement Comments.pdfo KARL T. KLEIN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0320 IDAHO BARNO. 5I56 a li;ii,',i- l IJ Pil 5; 20 Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5918 Attomey for Commission Staff BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF INTERMOUNTAIN GAS COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE ITS RATES AND CHARGES FOR NATURAL GAS SERVICE IN THE STATE OF IDAHO CASE NO. INT.G-I6.02 COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission files these comments to support the August 16,2017 Stipulation and Settlement (Stipulation) between Intermountain Gas Company (Company), Staff, and the Northwest Industrial Gas Users (NWIGU). Staff believes the Stipulation is reasonable and in the public interest, and recommends that the Commission approve it. In these comments, Staff summarizes the procedural background leading to the Stipulation, the Stipulation's main provisions, and why Staff believes the Stipulation is in the public interest and should be approved. BACKGROUND On August 12, 2016, the Company filed a general rate case and asked to increase its overall rates by $10.2 million (4.06%). The Company subsequently reduced its requested revenue increase to $9.4 million (3.7%). The Company proposed a September 12,2016 effective date for the new rates. The Commission ultimately suspended the proposed effective date until May I 1,2016 (see Order No. 33648), and NWIGU, Amalgamated Sugar Company, Community Action Partnership of Idaho, Federal Executive Agencies, Idaho Conservation LeagueA.,lW Energy Coalition, and Snake River Alliance intervened as parties to the case. COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) t) I o A public workshop, public hearing, and technical hearing occurred and, on April 28, 2017, the Commission issued final Order No. 33757, which granted Intermountain a $4.12 million (1.58%) revenue increase. On May 18,2071, the Company petitioned the Commission to reconsider the final Order relating to: (l) the data input into Staffs weather normalization model; (2) the Commission's preference for Staffs weather normalization model over the Company's model; (3) the disallowance of certain affiliated operations and maintenance (O&M) expenses; and (4) the disallowance of incentive compensation. In Order No. 33789, the Commission granted reconsideration on these four issues, and directed the Company, Staff, and other parties to meet to narrow disputed facts and issues and explore settlement possibilities. The Commission noted the reconsideration process must be completed by August 17, 2017, and that the Commission will have 28 days from then to issue a final order on reconsideration. See Order No. 33789. Subsequently, Staff, the Company, Amalgamated Sugar, and NWIGU met as directed. Staff and the Company focused on the weather normalization issues (Issues I and 2), while NWIGU and the Company focused on the disallowance of certain affiliated O&M expenses and incentive compensation (lssues 3 and 4). Following the meeting, the parties reported back to the Commission with a proposed schedule that the Commission ultimately adopted. On Issues 3 and 4 (disallowance of certain O&M expenses and incentive compensation) the Commission directed the Company to file comments by June 30,2017, other parties to file any response comments by July 28, 2017, and the Company to file any reply comments by August 15,2017. The Company and NWIGU filed comments and a response on Issues 3 and 4. Comments were not received from other parties. Id. On Issues I and 2 (weather normalization), the Commission directed the parties to continue to meet to narrow disputed facts and issues and explore settlement possibilities. The Commission gave the parties flexibility on the meeting times, but required them to "report to the Commission on their progress in time for the Commission to schedule additional proceedings on these issues, if necessary, before the reconsideration process must end." 1d. On August 16, 2017, the Staff, Company, and NWIGU signed the Stipulation. The Stipulation was filed on August 17, 2017, with a Motion asking the Commission to approve it. Amalgamated participated in the settlement discussion but did not sign the Stipulation. The o COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT 2 o a Company has advised Staff, however, that Amalgamated has indicated it does not oppose the Stipulation. STIPULATION SUMMARY Under the Stipulation: 1. Annual Revenue. Effective October 1,2077, the Company would implement revised tariff schedules designed to recover $1,219,206 (136%) more in annual revenue than the amounts approved in OrderNo.33757. Newrates would take effect October 1,2017. Details are reflected in Exhibit A to the Stipulation, which revises Attachment A to Order No. 33757. 2. Billing Determinants. Annual weather normalized billing determinants for the Company's: (a) residential customer class RS, including Residential Snowmelt, would be 213,576,738 therms; and (b) commercial customer class GS, including Commercial Snowmelt, would be 108,995,228 therms. 3. Consumption and Weather-Related Adjustments. The Company's base revenue requirement would increase by $6,065, while the overall revenue requirement would decrease by $2,634,338 from the amounts approved in Order No. 33757. 4. Gas Consumption Normalization. In future cases, weather-based gas consumption normalization would reflect actual test year consumption, rather than forecast test year consumption, unless the Company and Staff agree in advance that forecast test year consumption is acceptable. 5. Weather Data. In future cases, heating degree days may be weighted using billing system customer counts or customer counts obtained from the Company's o'weather system." But if weather system data is used, modeling results must be consistently adjusted for weather system and billing system differences for all months and customer classes. 6. Future Weather Modeling Methodology. No specific weather normalization methodology would be approved for this case (except as it relates to Gas Consumption Normalization and Weather Data as outlined above). Before the Company's next general rate case, however, Staff, the Company, and interested parties would discuss and attempt to agree on consumption modeling methodology related to weather. 7. Affiliated Charges and Incentive Compensation: The Company would recover $1,206,500 more in annual expenses-which amounts to $1 ,213,741in both annual revenues and base rate revenues-related to affiliated charges and incentive compensation. The Company and COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT J o o NWIGU negotiated this amount to be a 50/50 split of the dollar amounts related to these two issues, after adjusting for 5328,000 of affiliated charges that were "double counted" in Order No. 33757. This $328,000 adjustment is included in the $1.2 million increase in expense recovery/annual and base revenues referenced above. 8. Rate Spread. The additional $l ,219 ,206 (l .36%) in annual base rate revenues related to the above-described settlements on "Consumption and Weather-Related Revenue Adjustments" and "Affiliated Charges and Incentive Compensation," will be allocated among customer classes using the rate spread from Attachment B of the Second Enata to Order No. 33757, and a "50oA move towards cost-of-service [] for all affected customer classes." Order No. 33757 at 28. Exhibit B to the Stipulation is a revised Attachment B to Order No. 33757 reflecting the rate spread of the additional annual base rate revenues. STAFF EVALUATION OF STIPULATION Staff has reviewed and supports the Stipulation resolving all issues raised by the Company in its Petition for Reconsideration. Staff maintains that the terms put forth in the Stipulation are just and reasonable and should be approved by the Commission without change. Stafls view of the weather normalization and affiliated transaction and incentive compensation is as follows. A. Weather Normalization Because of extensive discussions with the Company and additional analysis, Staff has a much improved understanding of customer and consumption data used by the Company in its weather normalization methodology and the modeling techniques applied to derive test year billing determinates. Likewise, Staff has a better understanding of the differences between the Staff and the Company's consumption normalization methodology. While the parties may disagree on the quality of the underlying data and the most appropriate modeling techniques to weather normalize test year consumption, we agree on the annual billing determinates that should be used to establish residential and general service base rates for this case. The stipulated billing determinants eliminate 73Yo of the difference between those proposed by the Company and those proposed by Staff and approved by the Commission in Order No. 33757. Staff believes the adjusted level of billing determinants is a reasonable compromise on this issue, and notes that the change in annual revenue requirement resulting COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT 4 o o from this billing determinant change is only $6,065. Staff also recognizes that base rates applied to residential and commercial customer consumption will be higher because of this change. In exchange for lower billing determinants and slightly higher rates, the Stipulation includes steps the parties will take before the next general rate case to improve input data and modeling methodology. The Stipulation specifically includes three provisions that were critical to Staff supporting it. In particular, the parties agreed that: (l) consumption normalization methodology will be used to adjust actual test year consumption rather than to forecast test year consumption; (2) any adjustment to customer or consumption input data will be uniformly applied to all customer classes and all months; and (3) interested parties will meet before the next rate case to seek consensus on weather normalization methodology. These provisions will help assure that contentious issues in this case will not reoccur in future general rate cases. B. AfJiliate Transactions and Incentive Compensation While Staff did not actively participate in the negotiations regarding affiliate transactions and incentive compensation expenses, it nevertheless supports the Company and NWIGU's 50/50 compromise solution. Staff further supports the class allocation of this additional revenue requirement. Staff notes that the allocation follows the class revenue allocation approved by the Commission in Order No. 33757 and maintains that same fair and equitable cost distribution. Respecttully submitted this , 1fttauy of August 2017. lQ/ Karl T. Klein Deputy Attomey General N: INT-G- I 6-02_kk_Settlement Comments COMMISSION STAFF'S COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT 5 o CBRTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS ITth DAY OF AUGUST 2017, SERVED THE FOREGOING STAFF COMMENTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT, N CASE NO. INT-G-16-02, BY MAILING A COPY THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING: o MICHAEL P McGRATH DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERMOTINTAIN GAS CO PO BOX 7608 BOISE TD 83107 E-MAIL: mike.mcgrath@,intgas.com CHAD M STOKES TOMMY A BROOKS CABLE HUSTON LLP 1OO1 SW 5TH AVE STE 2OOO PORTLAND OR 97204-1136 E-MAIL: cstokes(Ecablehuston.com tbrooks@cablehuston.com BENJAMIN J OTTO ID CONSERVATION LEAGUE 710 N 6TH STREET BOISE ID 83702 E-MAIL: botto@idahoconservation.ors RONALD L WILLIAMS WILLIAMS BRADBURY IOI5 W HAYS ST BOISE TD 83702 E-MAIL : ron@wil liamsbradbury.com EDWARD A FINKLEA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NW INDUSTRIAL GAS USERS 545 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND OR 87520 E-MAIL: efinklea@nwigu.org ELECTRONIC ONLY MICHAEL C CREAMER GIVENS PURSLEY LLP E-MAIL : mcc@ givenspursley.com F DIEGO RIVAS NW ENERGY COALITION I101 8TH AVENUE HELENA MT 5960I E-MAIL: dieeo@nwenersy.org CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BRAD M PURDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 2019 N 17TH STREET BOISE TD 83]02 E-MAIL: bmpurdy@hotmail.com o o PETER RICHARDSON GREGORY M ADAMS RICHARDSON ADAMS PLLC 5I5 N 27TH STREET BOISE ID 83702 E-MAIL : peter@richardsonadams.com gre q@ri chardsonadams. com SCOTT DALE BLICKENSTAFF AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO LLC I95I S SATURN WAY STE IOO BOISE ID 83709 E-MAIL: sblickenstafl@amalsugar.com KEN MILLER SNAKE RIVER ALLIANCE PO BOX 1731 BOISE ID 83701 E-MAIL: kmiller@snakeriveralliance.org ANDREW J LTNSICKER MAJ USAF AFLOA/JACE-ULFSC 139 BARNES DR STE 1 TYNDALL AFB FL 32403 E-MAIL : Andrew. unsicker(a)us. af.mil LANNY L ZIEMAN NATALIE A CEPAK THOMAS A JERNIGAN EBONY M PAYTON AFLOA/JA-ULFSC 139 BARNES DR STE 1 TYNDALL AFB FL 32403 E-MAIL : lanny.zierran. I @us.af.mil Natal ie. cepak. 2 @us. af. mil Thomas j erni gan. 3 @us.al.mil Ebony.palton. ctr@us. af.mil hwla()l^^d SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE