Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20060630final_order_no_30091.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date June 30, 2006 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF A VISTA CORPORATION DBA A VISTA UTILITIES FOR AN ORDER APPROVING A CORPORATE REORGANIZATION TO CREATE A HOLDINGCOMP ANY, AVA FORMATION CORP. CASE NOS. A VU-06- A VU 06- ORDER NO. 30091 On February 16, 2006, Avista Corporation dba Avista Utilities ("Avista" or Company ) filed an Application with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission seeking an order for authority to conduct a corporate reorganization and form a holding company to be known as A V A Formation Corp. This Commission has the jurisdiction over such request pursuant to Idaho Code g 61-328. On April 28, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Application, Notice of Workshop and Notice of Modified Procedure, seeking comments from any interested persons. See Order No. 30026. The Order specifically set forth that a public workshop would be held on May 16, 2006 to discuss issues arising from the Application. No person or entity petitioned to intervene in the matter. A vista requested an order granting the Company authority to modify its current corporate structure through the establishment of a holding company. The holding company, A V A Formation Corp. (the "Parent Corporation ), would be formed as the parent company of the existing regulated company, Avista Corporation. The Parent Corporation would also be the parent company of Avista Capital, Inc., which would continue to hold non-regulated subsidiaries. A vista Corporation, doing business as A vista Utilities, is currently the corporate parent. The proposed structure would make A vista Utilities a separate company under the Parent Corporation and Avista Corporation would no longer exist as an operating entity. A vista states that due to the recent repeal of the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA), the Company considers it to be in the best interest of customers and shareholders to change the corporate structure of A vista by forming a holding company structure. The Company believes that this reorganization would provide additional protection for ratepayers by "ring-fencing" or further separating utility operations from the Company s other non-regulated businesses. ORDER NO. 30091 THE STIPULATION Pursuant to Order No. 30026, representatives of the parties conducted a public workshop on May 16, 2006, and engaged in discussions focusing on key protections for ratepayers with a view toward resolving issues arising from the Application. No other persons attended the meeting. Based upon the discussions between the parties as a compromise of the positions in this case, and for other consideration as set forth below, the parties agreed to various commitments that the Company will undertake as part of the reorganization. The settlement Stipulation contains 33 "commitments" or conditions that the Company commits to perform in support of the Application. The commitments address the need for ring-fencing, allow the Commission and Staff substantial access to the books and records of the utility and Parent Corporation, set forth cost allocation methodologies, and address equity building mechanisms and dividend payments. The Stipulation parties assert that the commitments satisfy the statutory standards for the Company s reorganization as set out in Idaho Code g 61-328. Stipulation at g 9. In the Motion that accompanied the Stipulation, the parties urged the Commission to adopt the Stipulation, its commitments, and issue an Order approving the reorganization. The Company will need to approach other states to seek their approval of the reorganization. The settlement Stipulation also contains a "most favored nations" provision. Stipulation at g 7. This provision allows the Commission to review and adopt any commitment or condition ordered by the other states, even after an Order in this matter is issued. Thus, any assurances, conditions or benefits adopted in the other states that would create a benefit to Idaho customers could subsequently be adopted in Idaho under the terms of the Stipulation. The parties to the Stipulation recommended that the Commission approve and adopt the commitments in their entirety. They further agree not to appeal any portion ofthe Stipulation or any Order approving the same. The Stipulation parties also recognize that approval of the Stipulation and commitments shall not bind the Commission "in other proceedings with respect to the determination of prudence, just and reasonable character, rate or ratemaking treatment, or public interest of services, accounts, costs, investments, in any particular construction project expenditures or actions referred to in (the) Commitments. ORDER NO. 30091 COMMENTS Comments to the Application were received from a member of the public and from the Commission Staff. The member of the public is a customer and shareholder of the Company. The customer expressed concern that the Parent Corporation may be unable to resolve bad loans it may procure without negatively impacting the utility company. The customer urged the Commission to deny the Company s Application. Staff contends that the Application along with the commitments in the Stipulation meet the requirements set forth under Idaho Code g 61-328. Staff points out that Commitment Nos. 1 , 10, 11 , 15, 17, 18, 19 , and 31 address the need for ring-fencing, with provisions ranging from separate books and records for each entity to providing a non- consolidated opinion to the Commission demonstrating that the ring-fencing around Avista Utilities is sufficient to prevent A vista Utilities from being pulled into a Parent Corporation bankruptcy proceeding. Additionally, Commitment Nos. 2, 3, 5 , 13 , 23 , and 24 provide Staff with access to a full range of books, records and other documents which would pertain to A vista Utilities and its affiliates, including the Parent Corporation. Comprehensive reporting requirements are also included in the commitments that would require the Parent Corporation and A vista Utilities to report to Staff and request approval from the Commission when certain events occur, such as the procurement of loans , the spin-off of any entity, the dissolution of business activities, dividend payment arrangements, and changes in the credit ratings of each entity. In addition Staff supports the commitments that include comprehensive arrangements for complying with cost allocation methodologies, as well as commitments involving the payment of dividends. The Company agreed, in Commitment No. 18, that A vista Utilities will not make any dividends to the Parent Corporation that would reduce A vista Utilities' common equity capital below 25% of its Total Adjusted Capital without the Commission s approval. Staff believes that the reorganization should reduce the utility s risk and improve credit ratings. Staff does not anticipate rating downgrades based on recent credit rating reviews. However, in the event of a credit rating downgrade due to the reorganization, Staff will calculate the impact on customers and propose an adjustment be made to Avista Utilities' revenue requirement in the appropriate rate proceedings. ORDER NO. 30091 Staff recommended approval of the proposed reorganization given that the Company and its affiliates have agreed to implement these specific commitments, conditions and reporting mechanisms. Staff recommended that the Commission accept and approve the Stipulation and adopt the Commitments in Appendix A thereto. Staff asserts that these Commitments adequately protect Idaho ratepayers and serve the public interest. COMMISSION FINDINGS Before authorizing such a transaction, the Commission must find that: (1) the transaction is consistent with the public interest; (2) the cost of and rates for supplying service will not be increased by reason of such transaction; and (3) A vista has the bona fide intent and financial ability to operate and maintain Avista s operation in Idaho. Based on its review ofthe Application, the Stipulation, the comments and other documents related to this matter, the Commission finds that the above standard has been met. In reviewing the Company s Application and the agreed-upon commitments , the Commission finds that the parties took into account customer comments that expressed concerns regarding loan arrangements and inter-company financing. Commitment No. 29 addresses these concerns by requiring A vista Utilities to demonstrate that the procurement of any loan from the Parent Corporation does not interfere with any of the ring-fencing mechanisms that secure the utility. The Commission finds that the commitments in the Stipulation assure that the public interest is protected with ring-fencing provisions and that these barriers are not overcome by any affiliate where the credit rating of one is used to offset the diminished rating of the other. The operations and structure of A vista Utilities and the Parent Corporation will continue to meet the requirement of having the bona fide intent and financial ability to operate and maintain said property in the public service. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Idaho Code g 61-328. Section 61-328 prohibits Avista from transferring any interest in Avista without the written authorization of this Commission. The Commission may attach conditions to its authorization and enter any final Order consistent with its authority under Title 61. ORDER NO. 30091 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Applications of Avista Corporation, Case Nos. A VU-06-1 and A VU-06-, and the Stipulation and the commitments therein, are approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order with regard to any matter decided in this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code g 61- 626. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this """ day of June 2006. PAUL KJ MARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER ENNIS S. HANSE , COMMISSIONER ATTEST: O:A VU-06-A VU-06-cg2 ORDER NO. 30091