OER-PUC Report Appendices.pdf

APPENDIX A - Avista IRP
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Case No. A VU-E-07-08
March 25, 2008
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
A vista counts on natural gas, not coaL, to meet future resource needs
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has accepted a long-range plan for A vista Utilities that
depends more on natual gas for its future energy resources, rather than coaL.
The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) outlnes how A vista intends to meet the demands of its
growing customer base over the next decade. A vista, which seres about 1 15,000 customers in
nortern Idaho, says it wil need 350 megawatts from natual gas sources to meet customer
demand. It plans on getting most of that - 275 MW - from the Lancaster Generation Facility
near Rathdru. A vista also plans on adding 300 megawatts from wind sources, 35 MW from
other renewable resources and 87 MW from energy savigs due to conseration measures.
Without the additional generation, the company states it would face generation shortfalls of
about 83 average-megawatts in 2011 and 272 aMW by 2017.
Avista decided to drop plans outlined in an earlier 2005 IRP for coal-fired generation for several
reasons including legislation in Washington state where the utility has most of its customers.
Washigton enacted a greenhouse gas emissions standard that precludes A vista from acquirig a
new pulverzed coal plant or enterng into a long-ter contract with an existing plant.
Several utilities have dropped coal sources from their long-range planing due to new emssions
standards and higher costs associated with the potential for carbon taxes, making coal less
competitive with other generation alternatives.
Avista's 2007 plan also includes fewer renewables - from 500 megawatts to 350 MW - than it
_. had hoped for in its 2005 plan. A vista said the cost of wind resources has increased by more than
100 percent over the last six years. Legislation in Oregon, Washington and other states that
mandates a cerain percentage of generation from renewable sources has increased the demand
for wind tubines. That demand reduces their availability and increases their price.
"Ironically, Idaho presently has neither carbon emission standards nor renewable portfolio
standards, yet the new legislation in other states has effectively limited the new generation
choices for serving Idaho loads," commission staff said. Utilities in Idaho that sere several
states must meet the requirements in all the states they sere. It is "impractical to develop new
generation projects devoted solely to serve Idaho loads," commission staff said.
A vista moved away from natural gas-fied sources in 2005 because of the price volatility in
natual gas markets that drastically increased prices between 2003 and 2005. But with the
elimination of coal-fired generation and the higher cost of renew ables, the utilty retus to
natual gas to meet some of its futue demand.
Commission staff urged A vista to develop new and inovative methods to counteract natual gas
price volatility and to maxize the use of cost-effective load control programs. Furher, staff
said utilities should "dutifully consider the potential for integratig nuclear energy into their
long-ter resource plang."
A vista is planng an additional 87 MW from conseration measures, an 85 percent increase in
conseration since Avista's 2003 IRP and a 25 percent increase over the 2005 IRP.
Acceptance of Avista's IRP does not mean the commssion endorses all the anticipated projects
in the plan. It means only that the utility has complied with a requirement to file an IRP every
two years. The commission recognizes that assumptions and projections can change over time.
"It is the ongoing plang process that we acknowledge, not the conclusion or results," the
commission said.
A copy of Avista's plan, along with other documents related to ths case, is available on the
commission's Web site at ww.puc.idaho.gov.Click on "File Room" and then on "Electrc
Cases" and scroll down to Case Number A VU-E-07-08.
APPENDIX B - PacifCorp IRP
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
Case No. PAC-E-09-06, Acceptance of Filg
September 17, 2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
PacifCorp relies on renewable energy to meet future needs
State regulators have accepted a planng document filed by PacifiCorp that details how
the utility intends to meet customer needs over the next decade. The utility serves
customers in Washington, Oregon, Utah, Wyoming, Californa and in eastern Idaho,
where, operating as Rocky Mountain Power, it has about 70,000 customers.
PacifiCorp plans to add more than 1,423 megawatts of renewable energy and does not
include any added coal generation in its plan.
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission requires that regulated electrc utilities file an
Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) ever two years. Acceptance of the plan by the
commission does not guarantee that it wil approve ever project proposed durng the 10-
year period. "The IRP, as we continue to note, is a utility planng document that
incorporates assumptions and projections at a point in time. It is the ongoing planng
process that we acknowledge, not the conclusion or results," the commssion said.
PacifiCorp said it wil begin to experence a capacity deficit in 2011 if steps are not taken
soon to increase generation and reduce demand. The utility anticipates a growth rate of
about 2.5 percent per year over the next decade. Further creating the need for more
generation is the 2011 expiration of a major power purchase contract with the Bonneville
Power Administration.
The vast majority of the 1,423 MW in anticipated new renewable generation is expected
to come from wind (1,313 MW) with the rest coming from geothermal (35 MW and
major upgrades to existing hydroelectrc facilties (75 MW.
On the conseration side, the utility plans to save just more than 900 MW from energy
effciency programs and another 105 to 325 MW from programs where the company
remotely reduces demand from customers such as irgators and industr durng times of
peak use. PacifiCorp also plans to add about 831 MW in gas-fied capacity between 2014
and 2016 and gain 170 MW of emissions-free capacity from coal plant tubine upgrades.
The company could have been short on capacity as soon as 2010, but took steps to meet
increased demand in 2008 by acquing a 520-MW natural gas plant in Chehalis,
Washigton, and adding 175 MW of additional wind resources.
PacifiCorp anticipates gainig access to more generation with the completion of its
proposed Gateway transmission project, a joint project with Idaho Power Co. that wil
transport energy from easter Wyomig, though southern Idaho (Gateway West) and
through Utah (Gateway South).
Commssion staff, which operates independently of the commission, commended the
company for a diverse mix of generation resources, while adherng to imposed and
pending environmental regulation. Stafffound it noteworthy that coal-fired generation
does not appear in the company's portfolio of future generation sources.
Staff did express concern that the company anticipates a more than doubling of the wind
integration cost assessed wid developers. The company's 2007 IRP used a cost of$5.10
per megawatt-hour to integrate wind, but includes an $11.75 per MW cost in the curent
IRP. Staff also said that costs included by the company to meet mandated renewable
portfolio standards in other states were not adequately quantified.
The IRP was developed though a collaborative and public process with involvement
from state utility commissions, advocacy groups and interested citizens. The document,
including attachments, is available on the commission's Web site at www.puc.idaho.gov.
Click on the electrc icon, then on "Electrc Cases," and scroll down to Case No. PAC-E-
09-06.
APPENDIX C - PUR A updates
Idaho Public Utities Commission
Case No. GNR-E-08-02, Order No. 30738
Case No. GNR-E-09-01, Order No. 30744
March 17, 2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Commssion updates rates to be paid developers of small-power projects
Developers of qualifying renewable small-power projects wil be paid considerably more
for their generation as a result of new rates published by state regulators that became
effective Monday.
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission updated both the fuel and non-fuel components of
a mechansm used to calculate the rates that Idaho's three major regulated utilities must
pay to small-power or cogeneration project developers whose projects qualify under the
federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, or PURP A.
PUR A, passed by Congress durng the energy crisis of the late 1970s, requires electrc
utilities to offer to buy power produced by qualifyng small-power producers or
cogenerators. The rate that utilities must pay project developers, called an "avoided-cost
rate," is deterined by state commissions. The avoided-cost rate is to be equal to the cost
the utility avoids if it would have had to generate the power itself or purchase it from
another source. In Idaho, projects canot be larger than 10 megawatts to qualify for the
published avoided-cost rate.
The commission recently issued two orders; one that updates the non-fuel components of
the avoided-cost rate, such as capital costs and operations and maintenance and another
that updates the always varing fuel components of the rate. The fuel component is
adjusted shortly after the Northwest Power and Conseration Council releases a new
natural gas price forecast, which it did in late December.
The result of both orders is an avoided-cost rate that is considerably higher than the
former rate paid by utilities to small-power producers. For example, the developer of a
wind far or geothermal facility with a capacity of less than 10 MW would be paid
$88.67 per megawatt-hour (or about 8.87 cents per kWh) for a 20-year levelized (same
rate all 20 years) contract with Avista Utilities. That compares to the former avoided-cost
rate of$70.12 per MWh.
The thee major investor-owned utilities in Idaho - Idaho Power, PacifiCorp and Avista
Utilities - paricipated in the case as did Black Canyon LLC, which is developing a wind
generation facility in Bonneville County.
PacifiCorp, which does business in eastern Idaho as Rocky Mountai Power, fied a
motion to delay implementing the new avoided-cost rate and, in the absence of a delay,
asked the commssion to decrease the size of projects that can qualify for the published
rate from 10 MW to no larger than 1 MW. PacifiCorp contended the Nortwest Power
and Conseration Council natual gas price forecast was too high given the recessionary
economic environment.
The commission said PacifiCorp did not present enough evidence that the rate is not
reasonable. Furter, the commission said, any utility can petition the commission at any
time if it believes the mechanism used to calculate the rate is uneasonable.
The order updating the published rates is available on the Commission Web site at
ww.puc.idaho.gov.Click on "File Room," then on "Recent Orders and Notices," and
scroll down to Order No. 30744. The order updating the non-fuel component of the
avoided-cost rate is Order No. 30738.
Petitions for reconsideration must be filed with the commssion by no later than April 2.
APPENDIX D - Order approvig decouplig mechanism
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Case Nos. IPC-E-04-15 and IPC-E-06-32
March 14, 2007
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone]
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
New rate mechanism designed to encourage energy effciency programs
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has approved a yearly rate adjustment designed to
remove financial disincentives for Idaho Power Company to implement energy efficiency
programs.
The rate adjustment, called a Fixed Cost Adjustment (FCA), is approved only on a pilot
basis, subject to modification or removal by the commssion.
Curently, when Idaho Power intiates programs designed to encourage customers to
reduce their energy use, it negatively impacts energy sales. If customers signficantly
reduce their consumption though conseration efforts, the company may not recover its
fixed costs of servng customers.
The FCA wil be a yearly adjustment to electrc rates that would prevent the company
from losing money when it invests in energy effciency programs. Often refered to in the
industr as "decoupling," the FCA removes the link between energy effciency and
energy sales by allowing the company to recover its fixed costs regardless of the volume
of energy sales.
Initially, the thee-year pilot program applies only to residential and small-business
customers.
When the commission sets rates, it determines the anual revenue needed by the
company to recover its costs. Durng the rate-settng process, the commission deternes
the fixed cost that should be recovered from residential and commercial customers. The
FCA mechansm wil allow for a "tre-up" between fixed costs actuly recovered
though rates and the fixed cost amount authorized by the commission for recover in the
company's most recent rate case. If the fixed cost recovered were less than the authorized
fixed-cost rate, customers would get a surcharge that can be no higher than 3 percent. If
the company collects more in fixed costs.than authorized by the commssion, customers
would get a credit. The surcharge or credit would last one year when the FCA would
again be updated. According to Idaho Power's estimates, the impact on rates for average
residential customers would typically be $1 or less a month. The fixed-cost adjustment
would be made at the same time the company adjusts bils for its anual power cost
adjustment (PCA), which allows the company an opportty to recover above-normal
costs of supplying power.
In exchange for removal of the fiancial disincentive, the FCA requires Idaho Power to
signficantly increase the size and availability of energy efficiency programs and to
support more energy effcient building and energy codes.
The pilot program is the result of a negotiated settlement between Idaho Power,
commission staff and the Nortwest Energy Coalition. In its comments, the Nortwest
Energy Coalition said "decoupling results in a better alignent of shareholder,
management and customer interests to provide for more economically and
environmentally efficient resource decisions."
The Idaho Citizens Action Network opposed the FCA mechanism as one that would
allow Idaho Power to receive additional revenue without any proof of need. ICAN sought
a more thorough review of the program and public heargs.
In its fidings, the commssion said the program wil require close monitoring, which is
why the FCA is a pilot program. Many of the issues raised by ICAN wil be considered in
the commission's assessment of the program durg the pilot perod, the commission
said.
"Promotion of cost-effective energy effciency... is an integral par ofleast-cost electrc
serce," the commission said. In addition to their environmental benefits, energy
effciency programs benefit all customers because they reduce or elimate the need for
the power company to meet load growt by adding new generation plants or buying
additional power from the wholesale market.
On the same day. the commission approved the FCA mechansm, it also approved a pilot
program that should encourage the constrction of energy-efficient homes.
Idaho Power curently provides an incentive payment of$750 to builder for each home
built to meet energy effciency standards set forth by the ENERGY ST ARan Homes
Nortwest program. The program approved ths week provides incentive payments or
penalties to Idaho Power for meeting or not meeting specified parcipation goals in the
program. Under this pilot, the company will provide marketing to encourage more
paricipation in the program.
On average, homes constrcted to the ENERGY ST AR(ß stadard in Idaho wil save an
estiated 2,078 kilowatt hours anually, or 30 percent greater energy effciency than
existing Idaho residential building codes.
Under ths pilot program, Idaho Power would receive an incentive payment if the market
share of homes constrcted under the ENERGY STAR(ß program exceeds 7 percent of
the total number of residential building perits issued in Idaho Power's serice tertory
in 2007, 9.8 percent of tota serce area homes in 2008 and 11.7 percent of total servce
area homes in 2009. The amount of the incentive would equal the percentage that exceeds
the target. For example, if Idaho Power were able to achieve 105 percent of the 7 percent
target for 2007, it would receive a payment equal to 5 percent of the total program net
benefits. The incentive would be capped at 10 percent of program net benefits. Penalties
would be levied for any year Idaho Power fails to reach the market share of4.9 percent
program paricipation it achieved in 2006. Impact on customer' rates would be
negligible.
The Industral Customer of Idaho Power opposed the program, saying customers should
not be required to pay Idaho Power to induce it to implement cost-effective conseration
activities. The Northwest Energy Coalition endorsed the program because it is strctued
in such a way that Idaho Power wil need to show excellent performance in order to
received incentive payments.
A full text of the commission's orders, along with other documents related to these cases,
are available on the commssion's Web site. Click on "File Room" and then on "Electrc
Cases" and scroll down to the above case numbers.
APPENDIXE
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
Case No. IPC-E-09-28, Order No. 30948
December 8, 2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Website: www.puc.idaho.gov
Idaho Power wants to make FCA permanent
Idaho Power Company is asking state regulators to make permanent a program that
allows the utility to recover its fixed costs of delivering energy regardless of the impact
energy efficiency and conservation programs have on energy sales.
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission implemented the Fixed Cost Adjustment (FCA)
in 2007 as a three-year pilot program. The adjustment, sometimes referred to as a
"decoupling mechanism," allows Idaho Power to recover its fixed costs of delivering
energy as established in its most recent general rate case even if there is a reduction in
energy sales and revenues because of energy effciency and demand reduction efforts.
Without a mechansm like the FCA, Idaho Power claims there is a financial disincentive
for it to promote energy efficiency and conservation programs because energy sales may
decline. The FCA allows Idaho Power to recover its established fixed costs through a
surcharge when it under-collects fixed costs because of reduced electrical use.
Conversely, if Idaho Power collects more than its established fixed costs, customers
receive a credit instead of a surcharge.
Durng the first year of the pilot, the FCA resulted in a credit of about 48 cents per month
on an average residential bil. Durng the second year, customers were assessed a
surcharge, or an increase of about 56 cents per month on an average residential bilL. The
FCA applies only to residential and small-business customers.
Idaho Power claims that implementation of the FCA has been a major factor in the
utility's substantial increase in its level of investment in energy effciency and
conservation, from $11.5 milion in 2006 to $21.2 milion durng 2008. That investment
has resulted in significant increases in the number of megawatt-hours saved - a 29
percent increase after the first year and a 54 percent increase after the second year.
According to the company's figures, the megawatt-hours saved durng 2006 was 70,766;
during 2007, the total saved was 91,145; and during 2008, the total was 140,156.
The commission has established a Dec. 16 deadline for parties who want to paricipate in
hearings or file testimony. The commission will later establish a schedule for processing
this case, including comment deadlines for the utility's customers or other interested
paries.
APPENDIX F - Idaho Power Energy Effciency Rider increase
(Excerpt from May 29,2009 press release)
Energy Effciency Rider
IPC-E-09-05, Order No. 30814
The money raised from the 2.5 percent Energy Effciency Rider is used to fund up to 20
programs that reduce customer demand on Idaho Power's electrc system. That demand
reduction reduces the amount of electrcity Idaho Power has to buy or generate, saving
customer money in the long-ru.
On June 1, the rider wil increase from 2.5 percent to 4.75 percent of customer bils. The
increase in the rider is primar due to a new commercial demand response program and a
greater than anticipated paricipation in the Irrgation Peak Rewards Program, which wil
be capable of reducing Idaho Power's peak loads in the sumer by 200 megawatts. None
of the funding from the rider can increase earnings for Idaho Power, but can be
used only to fund energy effciency and conservation programs.
"Rate increases are never popular and are especially unwelcome in diffcult economic
times," the commission said. "However, the information provided shows that energy
effciency programs have been effective in creating more effcient use of electrcity by
customers, and in reducing the peak demand on Idaho Power's system. These results
mean that higher rates to support constrction of new generating facilties have been
delayed or avoided altogether."
The rider was created in 2002, after the Western energy crisis of 2000-0 1. At that time,
the commssion directed Idaho Power to develop comprehensive demand-side
management (DSM) and energy effciency programs to help customers reduce bils and
lessen Idaho Power's dependency on the volatile wholesale market for electrc supply.
Energy efficiency programs in 2008 resulted in 107,484 megawatt-hours of energy
savings, a 72 percent increase over the 2007 total of 62,544 MW. DSM programs that
reduce demand on Idaho Power's system provided 58 megawatts of demand reduction in
2008 compared to 48 MW in 2007. (One megawatt is one milion watts, enough
electrcity to power about 650 average homes and light 10,000 100-watt light bulbs.)
"By encouraging energy effciency programs though relatively modest increases in the
rider, the commssion is delaying, or avoiding altogether, larger rate increases
necessitated by Idaho Power's investment in generation resources," the commission said.
The Nortwest Energy Coalition and the Idaho Irgation Pumper Association filed
comments in support of the rider, although the coalition said the amount of the rider is
"insuffcient to captue all the cost-effective energy savings potential in Idaho Power's
serce tertory and to operate robust demand-response programs to reduce peak
generation resource needs." The coalition noted that ''using electrcity more effciently is
the quickest and least-cost approach to meeting customers' power nees" because it
reduces customer bils and reduces loads durng peak perods when Idaho Power's system
is most stressed.
APPENDIX G - A vista effciency rider
Idaho Public Utities Commission
Case No. A VU-E..09-06 and A VU-G-09-04, Interlocutory Order No. 30870
August 3, 2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
Commssion reviewing A vista conservation programs
The Idaho Public Utilties Commission is takng comments though Aug. 28 on an
application by A vista Utilities to increase the rider that electrc and natual gas customers
pay to fud conservation programs and to create a mechansm for a yearly adjustment
each spring.
If the commission approves the application, there is no increase to the overall rates
approved by the commission in its July 17 order and made effective on Aug. 1. That
increase - an average 1.5 percent for electrc customer and 1.2 percent for gas customers
already includes the proposed rider adjustments. The net increase approved July 17 was
the result of the following adjustments:
. an increase to base rates for electrc and natual gas customers
. a decrease for electrc customers in the anual Power Cost Adjustment and a
decrease for gas customers in.the anual Purchases Gas Cost Adjustment
. a decrease for residential and small-far electrc customers as a result of the
resumption of the Bonneville Power Admstration's residential exchange credit
. an increase (subject to commssion review in this application) to the energy
effciency rider for electrc and natual gas customers.
The commission directed that the energy effciency rider portions of the adjustment be
made effective Aug. 1 on a temporar basis to avoid having several rate adjustments
within a short period of time. If the commission finds that the company has not
demonstrated a need for an increase in the energy efficiency rider, the rider account will
be adjusted in the near futue to accommodate the comiission's findings.
The rider fuds more than 30 programs in two categories called demand side
management (DSM) and energy effciency. DSM programs reduce customer demand.on
the company's generation sources. Efficiency programs help customers use their
electrcity more effciently. The commission approves rider for electrc and gas utilities
if they are found to be cost -effective for both customers and the utility. DSM and
effciency programs can save customers money in both the short ter by direct customer
paricipation and in the long ter because they prevent or delay the utility from having to
buy or build more expensive generation.
Avista proposes to increase its electrc rider from 2.24 percent to 3.27 percent of
customer bils and the gas rider from 1.55 percent to 2.6 percent. As stated, this proposed
increase is already in the overall rates approved last July 17, subject to commssion
review. Final approval of the rider would increase anual revenue by $5.4 milion.
However, increases in the rider cannot increase or decrease company earnings.
Revenue collected from the rider can be used only to payoff a $2.36 millon shortfall in
the electrc rider fud, a $1 milion shortfall in the gas rider fud and to fund ongoing
programs.
Avista's DSM and effciency effort are based on providing financial incentives or
rebates for customer paricipation in more than 30 programs. Some of the programs
include effciency measures for appliances, compressed air systems, HV AC systems,
industral and commercial equipment, lighting and motors. The programs also include
renewable technologies and sustainable building measures. Furer, A vista has long
encouraged the direct use of natual gas by its electrc customers with rebates for the
conversion of electrc-to-natual gas space and water heater loads.
According to the company's application, A vista contiues to exce tagets in electrc
and gas savings as the result of these programs for its Washigton and Idaho customers.
More than 110 average megawatts of demand-side management programs are now. in
place on the company's tota retal average load (durg 2008) of 1,100 average
megawatts. (A megawatt is one millon watts, enough electrcity to power about 650
average homes.) On the gas side, 1.9 milion thers were saved durng 2008, which was
136 percent of the company's target.
Of all the surcharge revenues collected from Washigton and Idaho electrc and gas
customers, 72 percent were paid back to customers in direct incentives to participate in
energy effciency and demand-side management programs. Ths does not include the
additional benefits such as techncal analysis and education provided to customers by the
company's DSM staff.
In this application, A vista also proposes to reduce large negative or positive adjustments
to the rider by filing on or about Feb. 15 of each year for either an increase or a decrease
to the rider.
According to the company's application, installing energy effciency measures "is a
direct action customers can tae to respond to a period of increasing energy prices facing
the Pacific Northwest and the countr as a whole." The application states that Avista's
energy effciency programs are being used by customers at unprecedented levels.
The commission plans to handle ths request in a modified procedure that uses wrtten
comments rather than conducting a hearg, uness customer comments can demonstrate
a need for a public hearng. Comments are accepted via e-mail by accessing the
commission's homepage at ww.puc.idaho.gov and clickig on "Comments &
Questions." Fil in the case number (A VU-E-09-06 or AVU-G-09-04) and enter your
comments. Comments can also be mailed to P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID 83720-0074 or
faxed to [phone].
APPENDIX H - PacifiCorp Energy Effciency Rider
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
May 5, 2008
Case No. PAC-E..08-01, Order No. 30543
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone],890-2712
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
Commssion: Customers wil benefit from increase in efficiency rider
Customers of Rocky Mountain Power in easter Idaho wil pay more for a rider on customer bils
to fud an expansion of the utility's energy efficiency programs. The increase in the rider, from
1.5 percent to 3.72 percent, is about $1.56 per month more for an average residential customer.
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission approved the increase as one that wil be fiancially
beneficial to customers in the long-term. "We fid that demand-side management, conseration,
and energy effciency measures continue to be the least-cost resources that utilities can acquire to
serve new load," the commission said.
PacifiCorp, the parent company of Rocky Mountain Power, anticipates a shortage of energy
resources to serve peak loads this summer. By implementing programs funded by the rider, the
company estimates it wil save 13,140 megawatt-hour per year. At the former 1.5 percent, the
rider fuded programs that saved about 8,000 MW durg 2007.
While those customers who directly parcipate in the conseration programs wil benefit the
most, "all customers, including those with fixed and limited income, will benefit from deferng
the cost of new supply-side resources," the commission said. Furer, Idaho's share of system
supply costs in PacifiCorp's six-state tertory wil decrease from expanded conservation
programs.
Revenue collected from the rider must go directly to fud and adinister energy effciency
programs and canot be used for other puroses. The enanced energy effciency programs wil
offer information, serices and cash incentives to help customers install energy efficient
equipment or make permanent operational changes to reduce consumption and save money.
The commission directed the company to file a report each year on May 1 outlining the programs
and demonstrating their cost-effectiveness. The commission also directed the company to
provide the information necessary to conduct a prudency review of the costs and expenses
related to the program durng the company's next general rate case. "Costs imprudently incured
wil not be paid by customers," the commission said.
The Northwest Energy Coalition filed comments in support of the filing. NWC contends
PacifiCorp has been underding and underachieving energy savings and believes the time is
ripe for a signficant expansion of effort. The commission should make it clear, NWEC said, that
utility performance not be measured on expenditue of fuds, but on the actual energy savings
acquired.
Rocky Mountain Power proposes these changes:
. Expanding the Finswer Express program, which provides incentives for commercial
and industral customers in effcient lighting, premium motors and mechanical upgrades
to heating and cooling systems. Both new constrction and retrofit projects are eligible.
Rocky Mountain Power reports there is a waiting list of business customers wanting to
paricipate.
. Adding the Energy Finswer program to its Idaho jursdiction. Rocky Mountan Power,
which operates as PacifiCorp in five other Wester states, offers ths program in other
states. It would provide incentives and honorarums to builder of new constrction
projects that excee cuent Idaho energy code by at least 10 percent.
. Modifyng and updating the Irgation Energy Savers program, which helps irgators
with system upgrades, including the installation of frequency drives on pumps that help
them to operate more effciently.
. Modifyng the Home Energy Savings program to increase parcipation and align
incentive levels with Idaho markets. The program provides incentives for residential
customers for more efficient use of washing machines, dishwashers, water heaters,
lighting, evaporative cooling, insulation and heat pumps.
Other programs fuded by the rider that will contiue without change are Refrgerator Recycling,
Low-Income Weatherzation Serces and the Irrgation Load Control Credit Rider.
A full text ofthe commssion's order, along with other documents related to ths case, is
available on the commission's Web site at ww.puc.idaho.gov.Click on "File Room" and then
on "Electrc Cases" and scroll down to Case No. PAC-E-08-01.
APPENDIX I
C. L. "BUTCH" OTTER
GOVERNOR
Marh 19, 2009
The Honorable Steven Chu
Secreta
U.S. Deparent of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washingtn, D.C. 20585
VI FACSIME & U.S. MA.. .
Re: The State ofIdaho's Energ Program Assurances
Dear Secreta Chu,
As a condition of reCeiving Iq:áho's share .of the $3.1 billon fudig for the State Energy Program (SEP) under the
American Recovery and Rtiew.al Act Qf2009 (H.R. IXAR), I am providing the fQllowi asurces. I have wrtten
to our pùblic utility còmtb:j$'$iotiaïateqùeSttid~lbårthêY' continue their~cçeSSt\Mt9Upling~iforiid'consider
additioiuil actions to proraote energyeffc.iéniy, çOQsjšteit witlthe Federal sttOry lanlugeconta~ in H.R~ land
their obligations to maita jttstand t~onlii~ 'rates, while protectg the PiiWc.1havè a1sQ' wrttn the appropriat---.----statege-anreâ-tøeyii5ii:s-.~bulding eie:tos; consistè.:wth State law and , ..._--.-
State Cansttutional reuiremeÎlts, and to coìiide thesttut¿iy language c.l'nedin ARRA. .
We are prioritingoúrenergy investments to tae advantage of e:i,;istgpi\grans ¡pdexpand piogriUs where
appropriate. Our State is ¿oiItledtb.aro1:ú,stimprovénient in eiitî' éffciêrèy áid renewable energy, as well as a
balanced State energy policy. I W3.t to assur yoú tlt, Withinthé limiisof ÌiyJuthority, we wili move forward in thesecriticà1 ar. . . .
We look forward to imediate distibution of the Fedeà1 SEP fuds topermt my State to make progres in
energy effciency and renewable energy.
As Aiways, ~L:~tua""'~~
CLO/sg C.L. "Butch" Ot
Governor of Idao
cc: Gil Sperling
Directr, Offce of Weatherization and Intergovernental Progrs
U.S. Deparent of Energy
.State Ener Director..
David Terr, Exeèutive Director
National Asociaton of State Energy Offcias
STATE CAPITOL' BOISE, IDAHO 83720 . [phone]
.._____, ..______________.-'--__...__ ..____._.~_____~R
APPENDIX J
~ b-.. NORTHWEST
.. :. ENERGY EFFICrENCY
..,.; ALLIANCE
Ocober 21s 2009
The Honorale C. L. "ButchS' Otter
Goveror of Idao
State Capitol
Baise, il 83720
Dear Goveror Otter:
Than you for appintig David Hawk as Idao's repreentatve to the Nortwet Eiergy
,. Effciency Alance (N) Boar.
It is an excitlg tie for energy efcIency and I look forard to worg with Mr. Hawk
as vie contiue to serve the region includig Idao, to accmpli our mission to
mobilie the Nortwes to become increaingly energy efcient for a sustanable futu.
I than you for brigig an indidua to the Boar with the depth and brth of
experence that Mr. Hawk has in energy reated mat, and parcuarly hi solid
undedig ofIdao-related energy conce. NE is appreatve of the tie and
focu you spent on the selecon and for the concentred foc Paul Kjelander
contrbuted to the effort. We are deely appreciatve to you both.
Sinceely,~~~
Clae Fulenwider
Exective Director
cc:
David Hawk
ilã'¿g&1mdèi, Idaho Offce of Ener Resources
War Kle, Idaho Power
529 SW Thrd Ave., Suite 600, Portd, Oregon 97204
ww.nwncoig I (tel) 503.027.8416 I (fa) 503.827.8437
APPENDIX K-Implementation of tiered rate (emphasis added)
Idaho. Public Utities Commssion
Case No. IPC-E-08-10, Order No. 30722
Januar 30,2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 898-2712
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov.
Idaho Power gets 3.1 percent increase; 1.6 percent for residential customers
Rates for Idao Power Company cutomer wil increae by an average 3.1 pecent
effective Feb. 1, according to an order issued todayby the Idao Public Utilities
Commssion. Rates for residential customers will increae an average 1.6 percet.
Last July, Idao Power asked the commssion to approve an overl averge 9.89 perent
increase with a requeste 6.31 percent increase for reidential customer. The utility
asked to increase its anual revenue requiement by $66.6 millon. Today's order
authorizes a $20.87 milion increae in anua revenue.
The order also establishes a year-round, three-tired rate stucture for resientu
customers to promote energy effciency and providecost-saving opportnits. The new
non-summer residentu rate of 5.58 cents per kUowat-hour for the first 800 kWh.of
monthly use is actally less than the current non-summer rate of 5.78 cents per kWh
Idaho Power proposed à. two-tiered rate under which customer would pay a rate 20
percent higher than the first tier once thei monthy consption exceeed 600 kWh.
Intead, the commission adopted a thee-tiered rate of 5.58 cents per kWh for non-
sumer use up to 800 kWh; 6.2 cets per kWh for use beteen 801 and 2000 kWh and
7.13 cents for use of2,001 kWh or more. Dug the sumer month, the fist tier is 5.78
cents, the second tier is 6.59 cents and the thd tier, 8.17 cets. Idaho Power's cuent
sumer rate is 5.78 cents on the first 300 kWh and 6.S 1 cents for use beyond that.
Rates for other cutomer classes var depending largely on how much it costs to sere
eah customer class. The rates approved by the commission for the major rate classes
(with the company's origial proposal in parenthesis) are as follows:
Residential- 1.61 percent (6.3 percent)
Small commercial- 0.42 percent (10.6 percent)
Large commercial- 3.35 percent (15 percent)
Industral- 5.62 percent (15 percent)
Irgation ~ 6 percet (15 percent)
In adopting a signficatly smaller revenue requiement than the utility reques, the
commission noted the deteroratig ecnomic conditions since Idaho Power made its
application to the commssion last July. "The volatility of the market and gener
fiancial distress on both a state and national level have trggered signficant commission
concer about ambitious fiancial projections based on 2007 customer growt" and then
extrapolated by the company into 2008, the commssion said.
The commission said it expects Idaho Power to contiue to demonstrate its ongoing
efforts to reduce operating costs and increase effciencies. Because of the tough economic
climate, the commssion said all utilties' fiscal responsibility wil be ''reviewed
extensively and continually."
Even in tough economic times, the commission must abide by state statutes requirng that
regulated electrc utilities be allowed to recover all prudently incured expenses in order
to sere customers in a safe and reliable maner. When the commssion denies cost
recovery to a utility, it must be able to legally demonstrate why the utility's costs were
not prudently incured or in the best interest of customers.
The commission disallowed some of Idaho Power's proposed expenses. The utility
proposed to include in its revenue requirement an increase of nearly $16 milion in
operation and maintenance expenses over 2007 levels based on anticipated growth in its
serice tertory. The commission allowed $2.87 million, noting that ths is an area where
Idaho Power has the most discretion to control costs. The commission also deducted
$11.2 milion from the company's proposed $91.4 millon in net power supply costs (fuel
to operate plants, power purchases from the wholesale market and other utilities and
purchases from in-state small-power facilities).
The commission disallowed the following amounts in these other categories: employee
incentive compensation accounts ($3.2 millon), legal serces ($192,300) and employee
purchase card expenses ($885,000). Idaho Power agreed with commission staffs fidings
to reduce $1.4 million in depreciation expense and $2 milion in payroll expense due to a
lack of increase in employees durng 2008. The company said it has responded to the
economic slowdown by instituting a selective hirig freeze. The commission also is
requing Idaho Power to reimburse customers $3.26 millon over five year. That is the
amount credited to Idaho Power by federal agencies after it successfully challenged the
amount offees it had to pay the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other
agencies during 1999-2006.
Idaho Power maintained a near 10 percent increase was necessar to recover investments
including $578 millon for 13 new substations, 1,157 miles of distrbution lines and 190
miles of transmission lines over the last three years. Durng the same time perod, the
company claims it increased the amount of electrcity it buys from other utilities from
$876 millon to more than $2 bilion. That includes purchases from renewable sources,
including wind and geotheral. The company anticipates spending about $900 milion
durg 2008-2010 in constrction expenditues.
In a depare from past practice, the commssion allowed the utility to include a greater
proporton of projected costs in rates to more closely align rates with the company's
expenses, thereby improving its credt rating and borrowing capacity. Typically, only
actul, historical costs are included in rates. But because of the time it taes to process a
rate case (about six months), the company often incurs expense that it canot recover
until months after new plant is in use. The commission allowed Idaho Power to include
major plant addition in excess of$2 milion thatwas to be completed by Dec. 31,2008
and allowed it to include an escalation in some expense accounts where a specific trend
could be identifièd. However, the commssion did not allow as much in forecasted
expense as Idaho Power wanted.
The commission approved an 8.18 percent rate of retu and 10.5 percent return on
common equity. The company requested 8.55 percent and 11.25 percent respectively.
Evidence supported a finding that a slightly higher rate of retu is required than the
curent 10.25 percent, the commssion said, in order to attact investors and to improve
the company's credit ratings, which can benefit customers by lowerng Idaho Power's
borrowing costs.
The company's ongoing constrction needs also prompted the commission to include in
rates an allowance for fuds used durng constrction (AFUDC) totaling $6.8 million
related to the Hells Canyon relicensing projects. Typically, AFUDC is not included in
rates until a project is in use and benefittng customers. In 2006, the Idaho Legislatue
amended a 1984 statute that prohibited the commission from including those costs in
rates except in extreme emergencies. The 2006 amendment said constrction work in
progress and plant held for future use can be included in rates if the commission makes
an explicit fiding that including those costs is in the public interest.
Including the Hells Canyon costs is in the public interest, the commission said, because
paying down some relicensing accounts now wil mean smaller rate increases in the
futue because all prudently incured relicensing costs wil have to be included in futue
rates. Furer, the commission said, "Idaho Power's cash flow wil improve, which will
help maintain its credit strengt to access fuds for ongoing constrction projects." The
commission said the relicensing effort, which is required by the Federal Energy
Reguatory Commission and has cost $95.6 million through 2007, is unike a typical
constrction project because it has been under way for nearly 10 years with no certain
completion date. Furher, Idaho Power is able to use the Hells Canyon complex
hydroelectrc projects during relicensing, thus benefiting customers.
The commission also approved a request by the Communty Action Parership
Association ofIdaho (CAP AI) to require Idaho Power to provide $25,000 anually to
each of the state's five communty-action regions for energy-efficiency education
projects. The commission declined a request by CAP AI that Idaho Power increase
fuding for low-income weatherzation. The commssion said the utility is already
actively involved in fuding low-income weatherzation projects.
Other paries in the case besides CAP AI, which represents low- and fixed-income
customers, included the Idaho Irgation Pumpers Association, the Industral Customers
ofIdaho Power, Micron Technology, the U.S. Departent of Energy (on behalf of the
Idaho National Laboratory), the Kroger Company (dba Fred Meyer and Smith's) and the
Snake River Allance. The commssion also held three public workshops for customers,
thee public heargs and a four-day techncal hearng.
A full text ofthe commssion's order, along with other documents related to this case, is
available on the commission's Web site at ww.puc.idaho.gov.Click on "File Room"
and then on "Electrc Cases" and scroll down to Case Number IPC-E-08-10.
Interested pares may petition the commission for reconsideration by no later than Feb.
20. Petitions for reconsideration must set fort specifically why the petitioner contends
that the order is uneasonable, unawfu or eroneous. Petitions should include a statement
of the natue and quantity of evidence the petitioner wil offer if reconsideration is
granted.
Petitions can be delivered to the commission at 472 W. Washington St. in Boise, mailed
to P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID, 83720-0074, or faxed to 208-334-3762.
APPENDIX L - Idaho Power automated meters plån approved
Idaho Public Utities Commssion
February 17, 2009
Case No IPC-E-08-16, Order No. 30726
Contact: Gene Fadness, [phone], 890-2712 (cell)
Commission OK's installation of automated meters
Idaho Power wil begin this year a thee-yea project to install automated meters
thoughout its souther Idaho service tertory.
Responding to an urgent directive from the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, the utility
wil replace its existing meters with advanced meterg infrastrctue (AMI) that wil
eventully allow customers to monitor electrc prices and adjust their use to take
advantage of lower price-perods. Idaho Power submitted a cost estimate of$71 milion
for the project and wil absorb any costs above that. Rates wil not immediately increase,
but wil be included in base rates as the meters are placed in serice. The commission
also approved the company's request to accelerate the depreciation time frame on its
existing meters down to three years.
The commission is urging Idaho Power to "move forward with all deliberate speed" with
installation beginning ths year in the Boise area, then in 2010 in the Canyon and Payette
regions and, finally, in 201 1 in the Magic Valley, Pocatello and Salmon areas.
The advanced meters can be read from a remote location, negating the need for an Idaho
Power representative to access customer properties. They can provide the company and
individual customers with hourly meter readings and inform customer of current electrc
prices, potentially allowing them to manage their use and reduce their bils.
Other benefits to customers and the company wil include reduced operational costs
associated with meter reading and improved meter reading accuracy, outage monitoring
and theft detection. Customers can also be disconnected and reconnected from a remote
location saving time and labor. There are also biling advantages such as fewer estimated
bils, less re-biling and more flexible biling schedules.
After the Wester energy crsis of2000-2001, the commission said advanced meterg
technology was becoming more necessar. At that time, the commission ordered Idaho
Power to evaluate and report on advanced meterg technology. In 2002, the commission
ordered Idaho Power to complete installation of advanced metering by 2004, but financial
and technical problems made it impossible for the company to meet that time frame.
The commission eventually adopted a phased-in implementation and evaluation
approach, with advanced meters installed in test areas such as Emmett. In an earlier
order, the commission stated. .. "the potential benefits of advanced meterng to
ratepayer and the company are too great to delay. .. implementation indefinitely."
The Idaho Conservation League endorsed adoption of the AMI program, saying it wil
encourage customers to be more effcient, which wil lead to a decrease in overall
electrcal demand and reduce carbon dioxide emssions. AA Idaho opposed the plan,
saying more information should be obtaied through a techncal hearng before imposing
the additional cost of AMI on customers.
The commission said it is mindful of the large capital expense, but said it expects Idaho
Power to "demonstrate its ongoing effort to reduce operating costs and increase
efficiencies and reminds the company that in the curent economic climate its fiscal
responsibilty wil be reviewed extensively and continually."
Copies of the commission's order are available on the commssion's Web site at
www.puc.idaho.gov.Click on "Recent Orders and Notices," and scroll down to Case No.
IPC-E-08-16. Petitions for reconsideration must be fied by no later than March 5.
APPENDIX M - Update of automated meters in rates
Porton of May 29, 2007, press release including AMI expense in base rates:
Advanced Meterig Infrastructure
IPC-E-09-07, Order No. 30829
Responding to a directive from the commission, Idaho Power has begu a thee-year
process to replace its existing meters with advanced meterng infrastrctue (AMI) that
wil eventually allow customers to monitor electrc prices and adjust their use to take
advantage of lower price-periods.
Idaho Power estimates the project wil cost $71 million over its thee year phase-in
process. In this application, Idaho Power sought the first installment, or $11.2 milion for
investments made between June 1, 2009, and May 31, 2010, which would have resulted
in a 2.22 percent increase.
However, the commission adopted its staffs recommendation to include only costs
though 2009, as more representative of the company's actual investment. The resulting
increase is 1.8 percent. "We are confident that such an approach wil provide the
necessar protection to ratepayers and ensure that the company is able to maintain
adequate cash flow and access to suffcient capital to maintain a secure financial footing
in the midst of the curent economic downtu," the commssion said.
The Snake River Allance fied comments supporting the company's application, but
acknowledged that the meters' benefits won't be realized immediately. However,
"eventul benefits wil lead to real energy savings that wil benefit all customers ...
though reduced energy bils and reduced need for additional investments in generation
and transmission."
The commission is urging Idaho Power to "move forward with all deliberate speed" with
installation beginnng this year in the Boise area, then in 2010 in the Canyon and Payette
regions and, finally, in 201 1 in the Magic Valley, Pocatello and Salmon areas. Idaho
Power is pursing federal stimulus dollars to help fud the project, which could eventually
reduce ratepayer costs.
APPENDIX N
OFFICE OF ENRGY RESOURCE
PAUL KJELLERAdri
32 Ea Fro St P.O. Bo 8320Bo,ldahO 8300
Co "'BUTCH" OTTRGQmo
(20) 28-4
FAX (2) 28-67
October 27, 2009
Wil Har
Execuve Dirtor
.Idao Conser-Owned Utities Associaton
POBox 1898 -
Boise, Idaho 83701
Wil Har
The Ofce of Energy Resour (OER) is in the pros of compg a rert on the 200 Idaho
Energy Plan. Speificaly, ths report is trcki the progrss rela to vanous action ite
contaed in the energy plan.
There is a setion with the plan that des diy with Idao's municipa and cooperave
utilities and in an efort to respond apriatly to the legislat, I am seekig your assista.
The speifc section of the plan relat to your associaton is as follows:
E.7 Ida' s muicipal and cooperative utlities shoul anuaUy report to th Enrgy
Division their estimaes ojcoat-efeetve coervation in thir service territories, ther
pla for acquiring. this resource. their conservatn and energy efiency
expendtures, an their estimated savings in electrical energy (MWh) and peak
capacit (kW) during the lifetime of th meauresimplemered.
At your ealiest convenience, could you consult with your membership and provide OER with
some lanage that addrs the secton reernced above. Your response to ths request wil be
incorprated into the fmal report that wil be delivere to the Idaho State Legislature prior to the
next session.
Thk you for your consdertion of this reuest. If you reui addtiona informaton, conta
. me at [phone].
~~
Paul Kjellander
Administrtor, Idaho Offce of Energy Resourc
APPEN"DIX iCOU - 2007
2007 Totals
50,440
13205
47,083
30,291
9,742
3,804,010
APPENDIX ICOU - 2008
H35,634
"w~wH,a~6.
...................JH,1I9
S1,eQQ.
.E1.,.?~?
$9 ~?5.
$204
$10000
$33150
$50,484
$16,440
$51,393
$2,000
$13,167
...J.~,~~??
. l1Le1Q
$3,932
$1,433,261
APPENDIX 0
LEGISLA'l OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Sixtieth Leislature
2010
Second Relar Session --
IN THE
BILL NO.
BY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
AN ACT
RELATING TO INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS TO PROMOTE ENERGY EFFiCIENCY;
SECTION 63-3022B,IDAHO CODE, TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT
OLDER THA 1976 TO CLAIM THE DEDUCTION.
AMENDING
HOMES BE
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:
SECTION 1. That Section 63-3022B, Idaho Code, be, and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows:
63-3022B. DEDUCTION FOR INSULA'lO~1 ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADE OF
RESIDENCES. For taxable years
commencing on and after January 1, ~ 2010, an individual taxpayer may
deduct from taxable income an amount actually paid or accrued by the
individual taxpayer during the taxable year for the actual installation~
not replaoement, of insulation energy efficiency upgrade measures within any
existing building in the state of Idaho which serves as a place of residence
. of the individual taxpayer. As useè in tRis seotion, "insulation" means any
material eoftoniy useè in tRe builèin~inèustry anè aotually installeè for
tRe purpose of retarèin~ tRe passa~e of Reat ener~y into or out of a
builèin~, inoluèin~ but not limiteè to, SUCR items as fiber~lass inqulation,
HeatRer strippin~, double pane ',¡indoHs, anè storm doors anè HinèoHs .As useèin tRis. section, "elfistin~ builèin~" means any builèin~ in bein~, unèer
oonstruction, or subj eot to an outstanèinq leqal buildinq permit on tReeffective èate of tRis aot.
(1) Definitions:
(a) "Energy efficiency upgrade measure" means an energy efficiency
improvement to the building envelope, such as insulation, weather
stripping, high efficiency windows, storm doors and windows, or ductsystem insulation and sealing that reduces the energy use. of . that
building component and is actually installed during the taxableyear.
(b) "Existing building" means any single family or duplex .building
constructed and occupied prior to the taxable year' in which the
improvement is made or accrued.
(2) Specific requirements for energy efficient upgrade measures:
(a) Upgrade measures shall meet or exceed the prescriptive value for
the improved building component established by 39-4109, Idaho Code
during the taxable year in which the improvement is paid or accrued
subj ect to the limitation of subsection b and the requirement of
subsection c of this section.
2
1 (b) Insulation shall be added to existing insulation and not in
2 replacement of it. In the case of uninsulated walls and other
3 confined building cavities it may be impossible to install the
4 amount of insulation required by subsection (a). In that case the
5 insulation value required for the deduction shall be determined by
6 the amount of insulation that can be installed in the cavity using
7 blown fibrous insulation.
8 (c) Window replacements must be Energy Star certified by the U. S.
9 Environmental Protection Agency during the taxable year in which the10 window is installed.11 (d) Duct sealing and insulation upgrades shall be deductible if they12 meet these standards: Duct sealing requires mechanical fastening of13 joints and mastic sealant, and insulation of ducts outside of the14 living area shall be to a minimum R value of eight (8). In addition15 performance testing of duct sealing and static pressure is16 recommended, and the cost of testing and sealing by a technician17 certified and operating according to the Performance Tested Comfort
18 System requirements promulgated by the Regional Technical Forum of19 the Northwest Power and Conservation Council is deductible.20 (e) Duct air flow testing and duct repair for better air flow shall21 be deductible where the final tested air flow is no less than eighty22 five percent (85%) and no greater than one hundred twenty percent23 (120%) of the manufacturer's recommended air flow for the air24 conditioner or heat pump attached to the duct system at an external
25 static pressure no greater than one half inch water column measured
26 using procedures specified in the Performance Tested Comfort System
27 requirements promulgated by the Regional Technical Forum of the
28 Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
29
3031 SECTION 2. The Legislature finding that an emergency exists, therefore
32 this act shall be in full force and effect on and after January 1, 2010.
33
3
STATEMNT OF PUROSE
The purpose of this legislation is to update the existing tax
deduction for existing homes. The update removes the restriction
that homes must be built prior to 1976 in order to qualify for a
tax deduction for energy efficiency improvements, defines
minimum levels of efficiency improvements by reference to
current energy efficiency requirements in code, defines energy
efficiency upgrade measures, and provides standards for
insulating, sealing, repairing and sealing ductwork.
FISCA IMPACT
This amendment will be revenue posi ti ve after considering income
tax on installation labor and material and product sale profits
and sales tax on materials and products. The deduction is
estimated to increase 30%--an added state tax loss of $200, 000.
A conservative estimate shows this increase would be offset by
$106, 000 estimated increased income tax on installation income
and material and net product profits and $105, 000 estimated
increased sales tax. State revenue is estimated to increase
overall by approximately $10,500.
CONTACT
Name:
Phone:
APPENDIX P
NEWS RELEASE
IDAHO OFFICE OF ENERGY RESOURCES
Release 2009-37
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Boise, Idaho - September 24, 2009
Contact: Paul Kjellander 287-4903
Administrator Offce of Energy Resources
Micron Awarded Stimulus Funds for Energy-Efficient Lighting
Technology Development Project
Governor Otter Announces Stimulus Support for Project to Develop Technology,
Reuse Facilties and Create Jobs at
Idaho Innovation Summit at 9:15 a.m. on September 24
The Idaho Offce of Energy Resources (OER) wil award $5 milion in available American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act stimulus funds to Micron Technology Inc. to advance a program
focused on producing energy-effcient Iight-emitting diode (LED) technology.
LED technology uses approx imately 1n of the electricity of today's standard lighting sources.
Applications include general commercial and residential illumination, municipal streetlights and
outdoor area lighting; off-grid lighting powered by solar for remote locations; television and display
backlighting as well as automotive lighting and instrument ilumination.
Micron's LED development efforts were one of four projects selected in May by OER and
reviewed by a council convened by the Idaho Department of Commerce as the best proposals to
stimulate Idaho's economy while creating an industry that promotes energy effciency.
"The project fits Idaho's long-term economic development goals through creation of quality jobs
and career opportunities in an innovative industry," Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter said.
This stimulus funding provides additional financial support to the significant capital and assets
Micron has also committed to the project. These include Idaho- based fabrication facilities, world-
class research and development personnel and advanced production tools and machinery.
OER Administrator Paul Kjellander said, "Investing in a new direction for Idaho's high-technology
industry wil restore jobs and growth for Idaho."
"LED technology aligns well with Micron's core semiconductor technology expertise," said Scott
DeBoer, Micron Vice President of Process R&D. "The stimulus support announced tad ay,
together with the significant R&D investments Micron is making toward this project, further the
possibility that this effort could help Idaho grow as a leader in energy-effcient LED technology."
More information about these project and the Offce of Energy Resources is available at
http://ww .energy.idaho.govl
(END)
APPENDIX AVU
All mixed together
Rnancil ex always couns their clen to "diver."
That's goo advice for the energy business, too.
At Avist, we light your reading lamp, charge your laptop and lots more with a
mix of fuel sources; That appoach can increase rèliabilit and keep rates more
manageable.
In 2007. we generated or cotrcted to purcase this much energ for you:
. Hydro
. Coal
. Natural gas
. Waste*
Wind**
mi Nudear*
ii Coeneration
II Landfill gases*
II Oter
Ii Solar
II Geotheral
50.88 percent
24.72 percent
20.09 percent
1.25 percent
1.13 percent
0.28 percent
0.11 percent
0.01 percent
0.01 percent
0.00 percent
0.00 percnt
* Avi do't ow or ope landfill ga. nudear or wate geeraon facilies.
.. Papang custrs purchase 66.638 mewa-hrs 01 new, renle elethro Avist's Buck-A-ki prm. Sinæ pang customers pad fo ths en
dire, it don't coe an Avist purc.
Source 01 data: /J reed by Avta Utilies to, and publish by, the Sta 01 Washng
Depart 01 Comunit, Tra and Econoic Deeknt Ener Poicy Diio fo
th '27 caler yea.
~~~rV'STA~
.
APPENDIX IPC
Where Did Your Electricity
Come From Last Year?
Idaho Power uses a diverse mix of resources to provide
its customers with a reliable, low-cost supply of
electricity. This mix includes hydroelectricity, power
generated by the company's coal or natura gas-fired
plants and from purchases from the wholesale energy
market.
These charts show the source of your electricity in a
normal year and the amount and sources Idaho Power
used to meet electrical demand in 2008.
Normal
Expectation
8.90/00.2ll/o~
2.6%47.9%
40.4%
2008 Actual
40.2%
13.9%
_Hydro
. Coal
Gas
. Long Term Purchases
. Market Purchases
Energy is a finite, precious resource, and Idaho Power
encourages its customers to use it wisely. For more
information and to sign up for energy efficiency
programs that can help conserve electricity and
save money, please go to ivwwJdahopower.comí
enercyeffciency.
CID# 470881387.8ki1l ~ iOO91daho _
APPENDIX 0
C. L. "BUTCH" OTTER
GOVERNOR
Marh 19, 2009
The Honorable Steven ChuSecre
U.S. Depaent of Energy
1000 Indepndence Avenue, S.W.
Washingtn, D.C. 20585
VI FACSIME & U.S. MA
Re: The State ofldaho's :Energ Progra Asuraces
Dea Secre Cbu,
As a condition of reiving ldào'ssliof th $3.1 bilion fuding for the Sta Energy Progr (SEP) under the
American Recoveryandl~.en(;\ValAct of2009 (H.R. 1 )(AR), I am providig the fQllowig assuces. I have writn
to our public utility coinssionandrequest:thatthey contiue theirsuccessfúlaeçupliig efforts and coider
additiona. actions to proiaot ener~ effpieJlcy, consistnt with the Fedra stator languge contaned in H.R.l and
their obligaons to maita justa,d reasonäblerate, whileprôtecg the pu¡'lic. lhave also wrttn the appropri.....~~dreuest-teynsid~()-ipro.e.bingy..coes; cosistent w..8aw_anL..... ..
State Constitutiona reuirements and to consider the .sttuory larguage contaed.in ARRA.- .. .
We are proritizg ourener~ investments to tae advantae ofeKistng ptQgram and expand progr where
appropriate. Our State is committed to a robustim:prôvemenf in energy effciency and reevvbleenerg, as well as a
balanced Stae energy policy. I want to as you th with the limits of mymthority, we will move forwar in thesecritical aras. .
We look forwar to imedatè distbution of the Fed SEP funds topet my State to make progress in
energy effciency and renewable energy.~A~~¡;
CLO/sg C.L. "Butch" Ot
Goveror ofIdao
cc: Gil Sperling
Director, Offce of Weatherition and Intergovernental Programs
U.S. Deparent of Energy
State Energy Dirctor
David Terr, Exective Director
National Associaton of Stae Energy Offcials
STATE CAPITOL. BOISE, IDAHO 83720 · [phone]
..--,.._-_.,._._-_.__._---_..~._._..~._---"-._---_.-._.."+._-,--""_._..__._..-._--~~-~----~.~.~--"~~
APPENDIX R
c. L. "BUTCH" OTTER
GOVERNOR
Mah 19, 2009
Paul KJellande
Adminstatr
Idao Ofce of Ener Resour
322 EastFront Strt
P.O. Box 83720
Bois, Idao 83720"0098
RE: State Energ Program Fundi
Dea Pau,
I am athig the relevan section of the reently pa Amerca Recover and
Renewa Act of 2009 (H.R. 1 )(AR), which conta a reuiment tht Goverors
mae cert asances regag ener effciency program and energy codes as a
condition of the State reeivig our shar of $3.1 billon frm the Feder State Ene
Program (SEP).
I am as you to work with the Ida Public Utities Commssion and th Division of
Buidig Safety to coordi efrt to fu th st's reuients unde the relevat
provisions of the AR. Such coordion ca bent the public.
I fuer reuest th you inorm me of your actions.
As Alwas - Idaho, "E Pera"q.d~~
CLO/sg C.L. "Butch" Otter
Goernor ofIdao
(D0726.00C 11)
STATE CAPITOL · BoisE, IDAHO 83720 · [phone]
4.."". ..
H.R.1-33
authoriation provide in secton S6S(t) of such Ac only if the
goveror of th recipient Stte noties th Secreta of Energyin wrting that the governo has obtai necessa assurace
that each of the folowig wi occ:
(1) Th applible Stte reguatory authority wi see toimplement, in approprte preeng for each elecc andgas utility. wi respec to which th State reto authorty
h~s. ratemldng .auth~, a gen~er olcy tht. enure: that
utity fina inctive are with helpi thei cu
tomer use energy more efcien: and tht P'de tiely
cost recov and a timey ea o~por for utisassocite with costectve measuble and verable ef-
ciency savigs, in a way tht suain or enhaces utiitcuomer incetives to use en more efcien.(2) Th State, or th app1ile unts of loc goverent
tht have autor to adopt buiding coes, wil implement
the followig: J
(A) A bu energy code (or codes) for residenal
buildigs tht meet or exeds the mos recetly publshedInternation Energy Conerti Code, or aces
equvaent or greate ener saving.
(B) A bui energy code (or codes) for commeibuildigs thoughout the State tht meets or exee theANSVASA Standar 90.1-2007, or acleves
equvaen or greate enrg savi.
(0) A pl for th judicton acbev copliancewith the bUiding energy code or codes descr'bed m sub
paraph (A) aD (1) withn 8 yea of the date of enct-
men of this Act in at le 90 percet of new and renovated
residenti an coercal buidi spac. Such pl shalinclude actve trning and enorct progrs an
meurement of the rate of compliace ea year.(S) Th State wil to th exent practcable prioritie the
grants toward fudig ene efciency an renewable ene
prgrms. inclding-
(A) the expanson of exting energy efciency pro-
gram approve by the State or tlie appropriate reator
authorty, includg energy efcienc retrts of budingand indusal facties, tht ar fued-
(i) by the State; or
(ü) thoug rates uner the overght of the
applicable reguto auorty, to the exentapplicae;(B) the exanon of exstg pr apped bythe Stte or the appropte regat autor, to sup-
por renewable ener project an deployment acvities.includig programs operte by entities wli have theauthority and capaty to mane an dibute grnts
loans, perorance incentives, and oter fors of :fanci
assistan; and(C) copertion an joint actvities between Stte to
advance more eft an efece use of th fungto support the prities descrbed in th paragaph.(b) STAT MA.-The State cost shar requret under
the item relti to "Depaent of Energ Energy Consertion"in title n of the Deparnt of the Inteior an Reted Agenci I
~
APPENDIX S
IDAPA 07 . DIVISION OF BUILDING SAFETY
07.03.01 - RULES OF BUILDING SAFET
DOCKE NO. 07-G301-0902
NOTICE OF RULEKING - PROPSED RULE
AUTHORITY: In compliance with Setion 67-5221(1), Idah Code notice is hery given that this agency hasinitiated prpose niemaking produres. The action is authorzed puruat to Section 39.4109, Idao Code.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE: Public hearing(s) conceming this rulemaking wil be Scheduled ifreuesed in
writing by twenty-five (25) peons. a political subdivision, or an agency, not later than Octobe 21,200.
lñe hearing site(s) wil be aci:essibl~ to perns with disailties. 'Requests for acmmodation must be mad not
later tin five (5) days prior to the hearing, to the agency addres below.
DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY: The following is a nontehnica explantion of the substance and purpse of the
proposedniemaking:
Secion 39-4109, Idaho Code, provide the Building Coe Boa with the authority to adpt specified building
coc.'S via administrve rule. The rules currently adopt the 200 editions of th building code and need to be
updated to reflec the most recent 2009 editions of the codes. Additionally, the American Recver and Reinvestment
Act (fedeal stimulus legislaion) include funding for sta to build ener efcient building. To rc.'Civc that
funding, Idaho has provide asurances to the federal goverment that it wil adopt the 2009 Intemational gnerg
Conservion Code. The rule would adopt the 2009 edition of th Inteational Ener Conseation Code with any
amendments therto as adpte by the Bod through the neotiat rulemaking process.
FEE SUMMARY: The following is a speific desption ofthc fee or charge imposed or incred: NA
FISCAL IMPACT: The following is a spefic desption, if aplicable, of an negative fiscl impact on the stae
general fund grer than ten thousand dollars ($10,00) during the fiscal yea reulting from this rulemaking: None.
NEGOTIATED RULEMAKI NG: Pursuanl to Section 67.5220, Ida Code, Rc-gotialed rulcmaking was not
conduced because of the simple nature of the rulemaking.
ASSISTANCE ON TECHNICAL QUESTIONS. SUBMISSION OF WRITIEN COMMENTS: For asistanceon tenical questions concerning th proposed nie, conta Steve Keys, Deuty Administratr. Opeions, (208)
332.8986,
Anyone may submit written comments i-egarding this proposed rulemaking. All written comments must be
dirc.'Cd to the undeigned and must be delivered on or before October 28,2009.
DATED this 28th day of August, 200.
SteKeys
Deputy Administra. Operations
Division of Building Safety
1090 E. Wau:rtower SL
Mendian, ID 83642
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
THE FOLLOWING ISTRE PROPOSED TEXT FOR DOCKET NO. 07-0301-0902
Idaho Administive Bulletn Page 154 October 7,2009 - Vol. 09.10
DIVISION OF BUILDING SAFET
.Rules of Building Safety Docket No. 07.0301-6902
Proposed Rulemak/ng
004. ADOPTION AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE.
Under the provisions of Section 39.4109, Idaho Code, the /e.a8wfng codes enumerated in this Section are hereby
adopted and incorporated by reference into IDAPA 07.03.0 I, "Rules of Building Safety," Division of Building Safety.
The effective dat of a 2009 edition of any of the codes adopte in this Section with any amendments identified
thereto shall be Januar i. 201 i. Until such time, the 2006 edition of any sueh code enumerated in this Section
without amendment win remain effective pursuant to Section 39-4109. Idao Code, Copies of these documents may
be rt"Viewed at the offce of the Division of Building Safety. The referenced codes may beohtained from Interational
Code Council, 5360 Workman Mil Road, Whittier, California 90601-2298 or hltp:/twww.iecsafe.org.~
!!
International Existing Building Code. 2002 Edition.
Internatonal Energ Conservaton Code. 2009 Edition.
(5-8-09)
(5-8-09)~L-
01.
02.
03.
International Building Code. 2006 Edition.
International Residential Code. 2006 Edition.
Idaho Administrative Bulletin Page iSS October 7, 2009 - Vol. 09-10
APPENDIXT
Idaho Public Utities Commssion
IPC-E-08-11, Order No. 30760
April 1, 2009
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone], 890-2712
Proceeds from previous credits used to expand energy efficiency education
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission chose a modified version of a proposal by Idaho
Power Company as the best use of $500,000 for energy efficiency education.
In a related case, the commission chose a modified version of a proposal by Idaho Power
as the best use of $500,000 for energy efficiency education.
In the 2008 emissions credits case, the commission agreed with a recommendation from
the Idaho Energy Education Project that a portion of$19.6 milion in emssions credits be
used for energy education. Proposals for an education program came from IEEP, Idaho
Power Co. and a joint proposal by the Offce of Energy Resources and the State
Deparent of Education.
The commission adopted the Idaho Power proposal, saying it is more focused on schools
withn its servce tertory and has smaller overhead and administrative costs.
Idaho Power's proposal includes expanding its existing program of energy education by
increasing the number of energy audits for homes and schools as well as follow-up
discussion of those audits.
Idaho Power will distrbute classroom energy kits to students to take home. Students wil
be taught how to read meters, including advanced meters that are being installed
throughout Idaho Power's tertory. With meters the students take home, they wil be able
to calculate the energy use of home appliances. Students wil also be invited to paricipate
in audits of school buildings, including makng recommendations for efficiency
measures.
The commission rejected a porton ofIdaho Power's proposal to add two more solar
. projects to the two existing projects in the Solar 4R Schools program. The commission
said the $75,000 allocated for those projects would be better used in the home and school
energy effciency components of the program.
The commission also directed Idaho Power to establish an advisory board to implement
the energy education proposal. Its members wil include some of the pares who
paricipated in the case. The board will also assist Idaho Power in preparng a final report
to the commission after the two-year project is complete.
APPENDIX U
C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER
GOVERNOR
lI DBPMTMEN
STAm OF IDAIO/l0l
EXCUTIVE ORDER NO. 2009-5
ESTABLISHING THE IDAHO STRATEGIC ENERGY ALIACE
REPEALIG AND REPLACING EXCUTIE ORDER 2007-20
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State of Idaho to utilize the natural resource of our
State to increase our enrgý supply in .aneconollically effcient and prudent manr while
protecting the integrty of our state 's reources; and
WHEREAS, the preence of an afordable, relîableand plentil energ supply is critical
for our state and natina economy; and
WHEREAS, the deveopment of reneable and/or sutainale energ sources, including
but not limited to bio-diesel, biomas, ethanol, methane digeters, wind power and solar, wold
be beneficial to farmers, rural communities and the state as a whole by esblishing additonal
markets. creating diverse and sutainable form of energ, and creating new job opportnities
for Idahoans; and
WHEREAS, Idao's energ resources can help Idaho and the nation to lesen
dependence onforeign oil; and
WHEREAS, to thi end, it is the goal of the State of Idaho that 25 percent of Idaho's
energ nee be provided through renewable and/or sutainable Idao-based energ sources by
the year 2025;
NOW, THEREFORE, L C.L "BUTCH" OTTR, Governor of the SUIte of Idaho, by the
authority vested in me under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Idaho do hereby order
the following:
1. The establishment of the Idaho Strategic Energ Allance as ajoint effort between
local, tribal, State and federal governents, as well as the for profit and not-jor-
profit private sectors. The purpose of the Allance is to enable the development of a
sound energ portolio for Idaho that includes diverse energ resources and
production methds, that provides the highest value to the citiens of Idaho, that
ensres quality stewardship of environmental resources, and that fùnctions as an
effective, secure, ~nd stable energy supply. .
2. The responsibilites of the Allîae shall be:
A: To provide policy direction and planning through an overseeing Council that is
aimed at increasing the State of Ida's prouction of renewable and sutainable
energy.
B. To work to improve coopeation. collaboration and iriormon sharing among
public and private sector entities in the area of renewable and sutainable energ.
C. To seek out new and innovative means to increae production of energy in Idaho.
3. Membership of the Council shall includ a representative frm the Ofce of the
Governr and the directors of the fol/owing State entities or their deignees:
A. Departmnt of Agrculture
B. Departent of Environmental Qulity
C. Departent of Land
D. Departent of Water Resources
E. Departent of Commerce
F. Idaho Transportation Department
G. Ofce of Energy Resources
4. The Council shall engage representatives and members of federal government,
local government organizations, tribal governments, Idaho universities, private, and
not-for-profit organizations having an interest in the energy juture of Idaho
pertaining to renewable or sustainable energ, and who can bring the expertse and
resources to create a successjul Alliance.
5. Council members shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor.
6. The Council shall meet at least twice annually. The chairman of the Council shall be
the administrator of the Offce of Energy Resources or his representative.
7. The Council shall submit a report of its activities to the Governor and the
Legislature annually.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused to be affed the Great Seal of the State of
Idaho in Boise on this 6th day of February in the year of
our Lord two thousand and nine, and of the Independence
of the United States of America the two hundred thirt-
third and of the Statehood of Idaho the one hundred
nineteenth.
~
C.L "BUTCH" OITR
GOVERNOR~.BE~
SECRETARY OF STATE
AP
P
E
N
D
I
X

V
ID
A
H
O

K
-
1
2
EN
E
R
G
Y

E
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
C
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
Th
e

O
f
f
c
e

o
f

E
n
e
r
g
y

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s

(
O
E
R
)
ha
s

c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d

o
v
e
r

s
e
v
e
n
t
e
e
n

m
i
l
i
o
n
do
l
l
a
r
s

o
f

A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y

a
n
d
Re
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t

A
c
t

(
A
R
R
A
)

S
t
a
t
e

E
n
e
r
g
y
Pr
o
g
r
a
m

(
S
E
P
)

f
u
n
d
s

t
o

K
-
1
2

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
sc
h
o
o
l

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

e
n
e
r
g
y

e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
.
Th
i
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

w
i
l

s
e
c
u
r
e

s
a
v
i
n
g
s

t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

p
r
o
c
e
s
s
ch
a
n
g
e
s
,

m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l

s
y
s
t
e
m

t
u
n
e
-
u
p
s
,
an
d

t
h
e

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

h
a
r
d

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d

t
h
r
o
u
g
h

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

e
n
v
e
l
o
p
e
,
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,

m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l

a
n
d

w
a
t
e
r

s
a
v
i
n
g
s
re
t
r
o
f
i
t
.

T
h
e

t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g

w
i
l

b
e

d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d

t
o
su
p
p
o
r
t

t
h
e

m
o
s
t

e
f
f
c
i
e
n
t

a
n
d

e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

b
o
t
h

t
h
e

t
u
n
e
-
u
p
s

a
n
d
ha
r
d

m
e
a
s
u
r
e

i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
TH
E

O
B
J
E
C
T
I
V
E
S
ID
A
H
O
'
S

C
O
M
M
I
T
M
E
N
T
TH
E

GO
A
L
Th
e

g
o
a
l

u
n
d
e
r

t
h
i
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
s
th
e

r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

s
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e

K
-
1
2
cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

e
n
e
r
g
y

u
s
e

b
y

1
0

t
o
15

p
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
v
e
r

t
h
e

n
e
x
t

t
w
o
ye
a
r
s

w
h
e
n

c
o
m
p
a
r
e
d

t
o

a

2
0
0
8
ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
.
1.

D
u
r
i
n
g

s
t
a
t
e

f
i
s
c
a
l

y
e
a
r
s

2
0
1
0

a
n
d

2
0
1
1

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y

7
0
3

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Id
a
h
o

K
-
1
2

c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

w
i
l

u
n
d
e
r
g
o

h
e
a
t
i
n
g

v
e
n
t
i
l
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d
co
o
l
i
n
g

(
H
V
A
C
)

a
u
d
i
t
s

a
n
d

t
u
n
e
-
u
p
s

t
o

i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

s
y
s
t
e
m

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
an
d

r
e
d
u
c
e

e
n
e
r
g
y

b
i
l
s
.
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y

f
i
v
e

m
i
l
l
o
n

d
o
l
l
a
r
s
wi
l

b
e

s
p
e
n
t

o
n

a
u
d
i
t
s

a
n
d

t
u
n
e
-
up
s

s
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
.
It
'
s

e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e
K-
1
2

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

w
i
l

e
i
t
h
e
r

c
r
e
a
t
e

o
r

h
e
l
p
to

m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n

1
5
0
-
2
5
0

j
o
b
s

i
n

t
h
e

I
d
a
h
o
ma
r
k
e
t

o
v
e
r

t
h
e

n
e
x
t

t
w
o

y
e
a
r

p
e
r
i
o
d
.
A
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y

b
e
n
e
f
i
t

o
f

t
h
i
s

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
s
to

m
a
k
e

t
h
e
s
e

j
o
b
s

s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e

i
n

t
h
e
lo
n
g
e
r

t
e
r
m
.
2.

D
u
r
i
n
g

t
h
i
s

s
a
m
e

t
i
m
e

p
e
r
i
o
d
,
pr
o
j
e
c
t

e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s

w
i
l

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
sc
o
p
i
n
g
a
u
d
i
t
s

o
n

7
0
3

K
-
1
2
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

h
i
g
h

p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

f
o
r

l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
en
v
e
l
o
p
e

m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l

a
n
d

w
a
t
e
r
sa
v
i
n
g

e
n
e
r
g
y

r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
Al
m
o
s
t

t
e
n

m
i
l
l
o
n

d
o
l
l
a
r
s

w
i
l

b
e
us
e
d

t
o

r
e
t
r
o
f
i
t

e
n
e
r
g
y

s
y
s
t
e
m
s

i
n
se
l
e
c
t
e
d

I
d
a
h
o

K
-
1
2

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
AP
P
E
N
D
I
X

V

(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
GO
V
E
R
N
O
R
'
S

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
"T
e

p
r
i
m
a
r
y

p
u
r
p
s
e

o
f

t
h
i
s

p
r
o
c
t

i
s
to

r
e
d
u
c
e

e
n
e
r
g
y

b
i
l
l
s

i
n

K
-
1
2

s
c
h
o
o
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s

s
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
,

t
h
e
r
e
b
y

av
o
i
d
i
n
g

t
h
e
co
s

o
f

p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
d

e
n
e
r
g
y
.

A

r
e
d
u
c
t
o
n
In

e
n
e
r
g
y

u
s
e

I
n

e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s

w
i
l
l
re
d
u
c
e

m
a
r
k
e
t

v
o
l
a
t
i
l
i
t

i
n

t
h
e

p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
of

e
n
e
r
g
y
,

p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g

d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s

g
r
e
a
t
e
r
se
c
u
r
i

i
n

p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

b
o
t
h

s
h
o
r
t

a
n
d

l
o
n
g
-
te
r
m

e
n
e
r
g
y

b
u
d
g
e
t
s
.
"A
N

t
h
i
s

w
o
r
k

w
i
l
l

b
e
n
e
f
i
t

n
o
t

j
u
s
t

y
o
u
r
di
s
t
r
i
c
t

b
u
t

a
l
l

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
,

s
i
n
c
e

b
o
t
h

y
o
u
r
st
a
t
e

a
n
d

l
o
c
a
l

t
a
x

d
o
l
l
a
r
s

p
a
y

t
h
e
he
a
t
i
n
g

a
n
d

c
o
l
i
n
g

b
i
l
s

f
o
r

s
c
h
o
o
l
s
.

A
n
th
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

w
i
l
l

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

o
n
g
o
i
n
g

b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
in

t
e
r
m
s

o
f

c
o
f
o
r
t
,

d
u
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

a
n
d

b
e
t
t
e
r
eq
u
i
p
p
e
d

a
n
d

t
r
a
i
n
e
d

s
t
a
f
f

f
o
r

o
u
r

p
u
b
l
i
c
sc
h
o
o
l

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.

U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
,

a
l
l

t
h
a
t

W
I
L
L
me
a
n

h
e
a
l
t
h
i
e
r

l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g

e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s

f
o
r
ou
r

c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
.

"
Fo
r

m
o
r
e

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,

v
i
s
i
t

t
h
e

O
E
R
we
b
s
i
t
e

a
t

h
l
t
:
/
l
w
w
.
e
n
e
r
o
y
,
i
d
a
h
o
,
g
o
y
.
Si
n
c
e
r
e
l
y
,
Cf
d
~
~
C.
L
.

"
B
t
c
h
"

i
'
vu
e
,

G
o
v
e
r
n
Id
a
l
i
o
Of
f
c
e

_
f
E
n
e
r
g
y

R
.
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
e-
-
~~

a
n
d

R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t

A
c
CO
s
t

a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e

w
i
l
l

t
h
i
s

p
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
r
e

a
v
a
A
a
b
l
e

f
r
th
e

I
d
a
h

O
f
f
c
e

o
f

E
n
e
r
y

R
e
s
u
c
s

I
n

a
c
c
o
r
a
n
c
e

w
l
i
i
Se
c
t
l

E
l
l
)
2
0
2
,
I
d
B
h
o

C
o
,

O
E
R
.
Q
7
.
Q
1
,
5
0
0
Appendi W - Energy-related legislation since creation of 2007 Idaho Energy Plan
Idaho Energy Legislation
2007
Biofuel infrastructure investment, income tax creditH0177 - Ch.165
Biofuel Infrastructure/Fuel Independence Act . . . H0150 - Ch.185
Electric facili ties, j oint participation by cities . H0030 - Ch. 28
Electric transmission facility, siting, certificateH0152 - Ch.186
Energy Facility Site Advisory Act. . . . . . . . .H0154 - Ch.164
Energy Resources Authority, operations, investmentsH0032 - Ch.107Wind energy electrical production, tax .H0189 - Ch.143
Energy Facility Site Advisory Act. . . . . . . . .H0154 - Ch.164
2008
Energy facility, commercial purpose, endowment landsH0500 - Ch.115
Geothermal energy electrical production, tax . . . H0529 - Ch.227
Energy Efficient State Buildings Act. . . . . . .H0422 - Ch.274
Energy savings performance, facilities, contractorsH0556 - Ch.366
Energy-producing materials, sales tax exemption. . H0561 - Ch.233
2009
Energy~efficient school building design .......... S1132 - ch.145
APPENDIX X
Idaho Statutes
TITLE 33
EDUCATION
CHAPTER 10
FOUNDATION PROGRA -- STATE AID -- APPORTIONMENT
33-1019.ALLOCATION FOR SCHOOL BUILDING MAINTENANCE REQUIRED. (1)
School districts shall annually allocate moneys for school
building maintenance from any source available to the district
equal to at least two percent (2%) of the replacement value of
school buildings, less the receipt of state funds as provided in
this section. Any school district expending more than four
percent (4%) of the replacement value of school buildings for
school building maintenance in any single fiscal year, beginning
with the expenditures of fiscal year 2005, may apply the excess
as a credit against the two percent (2%) requirement of this
section until such credit is depleted or fifteen (15) years have
expired. The state shall annually provide funds to be allocated
for school building maintenance as follows:
(a) Di vide one (1) by the school district's value index for the
fiscal year, as calculated pursuant to section 33-906B, Idaho
Code; and
(b) -Multiply the result by one-half of one percent (0.5%) of the
replacement value of school buildings.
(c) For purposes of the calculation in this subsection (1),
public charter schools shall be assigned a value index of one
(1) .
(2) State funds shall be appropriated through the
educational support program/division of facilities and disbursed
from the school district building account. The order of fundingsources used to meet the state funding requirements of this
section shall be as follows:
(a) State lottery funds distributed pursuant to section 33-
905 (2), Idaho Code;
(b) If state lottery funds are insufficient to meet the state
funding requirements of this section, then other state funds
available pursuant to section 33-905 (3), Idaho Code, shall be
utilized; and
(c) If the funds in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection
(2) are insufficient to meet the state funding requirements of
this section, then funds available pursuant to section 33-1018B,
Idaho Code, shall be utilized.
(3) Moneys allocated for school building maintenance shall
be used exclusively for the maintenance and repair of school
buildings or any serious or imminent safety hazard on the
property of said school buildings as identified pursuant to
chapter 80, title 39, Idaho Code, and shall be utilized, first,
to abate serious or imminent safety hazards, as identified
pursuant to chapter 80, title 39, Idaho Code. Unexpended moneys
in a school district's school building maintenance allocation
shall be carried over from year to year and shall remain
allocated for the purposes specified in this subsection (3). The
replacement value of school buildings shall be determined by
mul tiplying the numer of square feet of building floor space inschool buildings by eighty-one dollars and forty-five cents
($81.45). Notwithstanding the definition in subsection (8) of
this section, school buildings that are less than one (1) year
old on the first day of school shall not be used in the
replacement value calculation. The joint finance-appropriations
committee shall annually review the replacement value per square
foot when setting appropriations for the educational support
program and may make adjustments to this figure as necessary.
(4) For school buildings first occupied between July 1,
2009, through September 30, 2019, regarding the replacement value
calculation that school districts are directed to use to
determine the amount of moneys such districts shall allocate for
school building maintenance as directed by subsection (1) of this
section, a portion of the square footage of school buildings
first occupied on or after July 1, 2009, and constructed pursuant
to the provisions of section 33-356, Idaho Code, shall not be
used in the replacement value calculation, based on the following
schedule:
(a) For school buildings at least one (1) year old but less than
two (2) years old on the first day of school, exclude one hundred
percent (100%) of the square footage;
(b) For school buildings at least two (2) years old but less
than three (3) years old on the first day of school, exclude
eighty percent (80%) of the square footage;
(c) For school buildings at least three (3) years old but less
than four (4) years old on the first day of school, exclude sixty
percent (60%) of the square footage;
(d) For school buildings at least four (4) years old but less
than five (5) years old on the first day of school, exclude forty
percent (40%) of the square footage; and
(e) For school buildings at least five (5) years old but less
than six (6) years old on the first day of school, exclude twenty
percent (20%) of the square footage.
(5) The amount of relief provided to any school district
pursuant to subsection (4) of this section shall not exceed the
amount that would be provided if the school district had a valueindex of one (1).
(6) School districts shall submit the following to the
state department of education by not later than December 1:
(a) The numer of square feet of school building floor space;
and
(b) The funds and fund sources allocated for school building
maintenance and any unexpended allocations carried forward from
prior fiscal years; and
(c) The projects on which moneys from the school district's
school building maintenance allocation were expended, and the
amount and categories of expenditures; and
(d) The planned uses of the school district's school building
maintenance allocation.The state department of education shall transmit a sumary of
such reports to the legislature by not later than January 15 of
the following year.
(7) If a school district that is participating in the
relief provided for in subsection (4) qf this section is forgiven
the requirement to allocate the school district portion of the
moneys for the two percent (2%) of building replacement value for
building maintenance provided in subsection (1) of this section,
then once the requirements of subsection (1) of this section are
reinstated, the provisions of subsection (4) of this section
shall recommence from the time the forgiveness took effect.
(8) For the purposes of this section:
(a) "Annually" means each fiscal year.
(b) "School building" means buildings that are owned by the
school district or leased by the school district through a lease-
purchase agreement and are regularly occupied by students.
(c) "School district" means a school district or public charterschool.
The Idaho Code is made availble on the Internet by the Idaho Leslature as a public servce. This Internet version of the Idaho Code
may not be used for commercial purposes, nor may ths database be published or repackaged for commercia sale without express
written permssion.
The Idaho Code is the property of the state of Idaho, and is copyrighted by Idaho law,
i.e. § 9-350. According to Idaho law, any person who reproduces or distributes the
Idaho Code for commercial purposes in violation of the provisions of this statute shall be
deemed to be an infinger of the state of Idaho's copyright.
APPENDIX Y - Text of proposed rules
IDAPA 07 - DIVISION OF BUILDING SAFETY
07.03.01 - RULES OF BUILDING SAFETY
DOCKET NO. 07-0301-0903
NOTICE OF RULEMAG - PROPOSED RULE AUTHORITY: In compliance with Section 67-
5221(1), Idao Code, notice is hereby given tht this agency has intiated proposed rulemakg procedures.
The action is authorized puruat to Section 33-356 and 67-2601A, Idaho Code.
PUBLIC HEARG SCHEDULE: Public hearg(s) concerning ths rulemakg will be scheduled if
requested in wrtig by twenty-five (25) persons, a political subdivision, or an agency, not later than
October 21,2009. The hearng site(s) wil be accessible to persons with disabilities. Requests for
accommodation must be made not later than five (5) days prior to the hearg, to the agency addrss below.
DESCRITIVE SUMY: The followig is a nontechncal explanation of the substace and purose
of the proposed rulemakg: A new section of the Idao Code codified at Section 33-356 was passed by the
legislatue in 2009, which provides fiancial incentives for school distrcts to use integrated design and
fudaental commissionig building practices in the constrction of school buildig facilities. Puuant to
that statute, the adminstrator of the Division of Buildig Safety is required to promulgate rules which
provide guidance and technical information for school distrcts, as well as rules governing an anual
optiization review to ensure optial energy penormance of buildig systems. The rule would provide
notice of the availability of gudace, educational, and techncal support to school distrcts to implement the
processes of integrated design and fudaental commssionig, as well as the availability 6f a list of all
thd par commissionig agents in the state; provide for a process of performg and cering the anual
optimization review to ensure energy effciency; and provide for certfications regarding quaification of
schools for the building replacement value calculation.
FEE SUMY: The following is a specific description of the fee or charge imposed or increased: N/A
FISCAL IMP ACT: The followig is a specific description, if applicable, of any negative fiscal impact on
the state general fud greater than ten thousand dollar ($10,000) durig the fiscal year resultig from ths
rulemakg: None.
NEGOTIATED RULEMAG: Pusuant to Section 67-5220, Idao Code, negotiated ruemakg was
not conducted because of the simple nature of the rulemakg.
ASSISTANCE ON TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, SUBMISSION OF WRTTEN COMMNTS: For
assistace on techncal questions concerning the proposed rule, contact Steve Keys, Deputy Admstrator -
Operations, [phone]. Anyone may submit wrtten comments regardig this proposed rulemakg.
Al wrtten comments must be diected to the undersigned and must be delivered on or before October 28,
2009. DATED ths 28th day of August, 2009. Steve Keys Deputy Administrator - Operations Division of
Building Safety 1090 E. Watertower St. Meridian, il 83642 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
DIVSION OF BUILDING SAFETY Docket No. 07-0301-0903 Rules of BuDding Safety Proposed
Rulemaking Idaho Adminstrative Buletin Page 157 October 7, 2009 - Vol. 09-10
THE FOLLOWIG IS THE PROPOSED TEXT FOR DOCKET NO. 07-0301-0903 038.
INTEGRATED DESIGN AND FUNDAMNTAL COMMSSIONING.
01. Definitions. The following defitions are intended to supplement, and should be read in conjunction
with the defintions contained in Section 33-356, Idao Code. () a. Fundaental Commssionig. A
quality-focused process for enhancing the delivery of a project. It makes use of a qualified thd par
employed directly by the buildig owner. ( ) b. Integrted Design. Integrated design refer to a
collaborative design effort in which each of the individual architectul or engineeng professionals
focuses on the whole buildig approach, with an emphasis on optimizing the building's pedormance,
environmenta sustainability, and cost-savigs, to include cliate, use, loads and systems resulting in a
more comfortble and productive environment, and a building that is more energy-efficient than would be
realied using curent best practices. ( )
02. Techncal and Educational Information. Techncal and educational iiormation related to integrated
design and fudaenta commissionig in the form of the American Institute of Architects Integrated
Project Delivery Guide; Portand Energy Consation, Inc. (PECI) Commissionig Guides; ASHRA
Guideline 0- 2005- The Commssionig Process; and the Nortwest Energy Effciency Aliace Integrated
Design Special Focus on Energy Pedormance Guide is available at the Division offce locations includig
1090 E. Watertower St., Meridian, Idao 83642, and 1250 Ironwood Dr., Ste. 220, Coeur d'Alene, Idao
83814. A building commissioned under the prescriptive approaches defined by any of the above-named
national organzations is deemed to have completed the Fundamental Commissionig process. ( ) 03.
Commissioiung Agents. The Division has compiled and made available for public examination a list of all
known thd pàr buildig commissionig agents in Idao and its contiguous states. The Division has
ensured that all such commissioning agents appearg on ths list have been certfied by the Building
Commssionig Association (BCA) or other similar certfyg entity. ()
04. Anual Optiation Review. ( ) a. A public school buildig which quafies for the school buildig
replacement value calculation puruant to Section 33-356(5)(a), Idao Code, shal undergo an anual
optimation review each year followig the fit year of operations tht the involved school distrct seeks
to qualify such building for the buildig relacement value calculation. ( ) b. The systems with a buildig
required to undergo anual optiation review, as well as any relevant measurg criteria for such
systems, shall be formulated by the thd par commissionig agent that pedorms the initial fudaental
commissionig. The school distrct shall be provided with a wrttn report from the commissioning agent
identifyg the systems which wil be subject to the anual optimization review along with any other
requirements. () c. The report required above in Pargraph 038.03.b. of these rules shall include, but is not
lited to, at least the following: () i.. Verification that the heatig, ventilation, and air conditioning
(HV AC) controls, dapers, valves, senors and other equipment used to control the syste are fuctioning
as they were at the commissionig of the building. ( ) ü. Verfication that the lightig controls are
fuctionig as they were at the commssionig of the buildig. ( ) iii. The requirement that any changes
made to any of the controls contained on the agent's list aftr the intial commissionig be re-set back to the
commssioned settgs uness it can be demonstrated that the new settgs result in greater energy
effciency. ( ) d. The anual optimization review shall be pedormed by persons qualified to make the
required determintions and adjustments. ( ) e. The school distrct shall submit to the Division wrtten
verification indicatig that the systems identified by the commissionig agent, includig those identified in
this Section are fuctionig as they were at the initial commssionig. Such wrtten verfication shall also
identify the persons pedorming the optiation and their qualifications. ( )
05. Commssioiung Aniuversary Date. The date upon which the commissionig agent provides the
school distrct with the requied wrtten report described in Paragrph 038.03.b. of these rules shal be the
commissionig anversary date for puroses of ths Section. If a school distrct seeks to qualify a building
for the building replacement value calculation, the anual optiization review shall be pedormed with
th (30) days of the anual commissionig anversar date followig the fist year the building is in
operation. The wrttn verfication required by Pargrph 038.03.e. of these rules shall be received by the
Division not later th sixty (60) days after the anual commssionig anvers date. ()
06. Fundamental Buiding Commissionig Requiements. ( ) a. School distrcts seeking to qualify a
buildig for the building replacement value calculation shall engage a building commssionig agent. ( ) b.
The commissionig agent must document the owner's requirements for each commssioned system in the
facility. Al HV AC and controls systems, duct work and piping, renewable and alternative technologies,
lightig controls and day lightig, waste heat recovery, and any other advanced technologies incorporated
in the building must be commissioned. Building envelope systems must also be verified. The owner's
requirements for these systems may include effciency tagets and other pedormance criteria such as
temperatue and lightig levels that wil derme the pedormance criteria for the fuctional pedormance
testig tht occurs prior to acceptace.( ) c. The commissionig agent shall include commissionig
requirements in the project constrction documents. Ths includes the scope of commissioning for the
project, the systems to be commissioned, and the varous requirements related to schedule, submittl
reviews, testig, tring, 0 & M manuals, and wartý reviews. ( ) d. The commissionig agent shall
develop and utilize a commissioning plan. This plan must include an overview of the commissioning
process for the project, a list of commissioned systems, priar commissioning paricipants and their roles,
a communication and management plan, an outline of the scope of commssionig tasks, a list of work
products, a schedule, and a description of any commissionig testig activities. ( ) e. The commissioning
agent must submit a report to the owner once the commissionig plan has been executed. ( )
0389. -- 999. (RSERVED).
APPENDIX Z
c THE CALDWELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Building energy-efficient, high-performing schools
Van Buren Elementary
Financially responsible and environmentally conscous.
Caldwell is taking control of energy use. .
E nerg-srt building choices can signifUy reduæ
openg cots and crate bett place to Ieam and
teach. The Caldwell Scool Disct is pro to be the
fi schoo distnct in Idaho to tae energ-sart building to one
of the highest nationl rating leels. CaU is aetingthe
net generatin of school building.
CAlDWELL FACT: The Caldwell School Dislrct antiipates
saving 30 percnt in fute energy cost by cotrctng Wash-
ingtand Van Burn elementary scoo with energy savng
feature.
NATIONAL FACTS: Schoos spen mor 1Ian $6 bilion a
year on energy and abou 25 pecent of th dolla could be
save by being smart abou energ, accrding to the U.S. De-
partent of Ener. In mo scfools, enrgy co are secnd
only to salari and exee the cot of supplies an bos.
OUR MESSAGE: Energy sang innotion in building
sch wiD great improve a teer's abilit to do their jo
and a chllds ability to lea. Teacrs and s~cInts will brthe
heaUhie air and work in more comfrtbl conditons and be
more succsfL.
VAN BUREN FACTS
*Ab 600 stdents in graes K-5 will attnd in th fal of 2009
(89 perc fa be th pove line; 70 pent are Hispani)
* Studnts at Van Bure ha for the pa two year achiev
Adequte Yeaity Prgres (AVP), an acdemic benchmark esb-
lished by the feera government
*The new scools 70,000 squa feet and wi. cot $12 million,
which iscoraJe to other re coct prec in the
Treasre Valey.
* Th CS took adntae of a deign~ull pros wh
profesals woked tDgethr to enure syms wee inra
and th work wa done swy.
* The CSD tok advge of energ-sving pemal' c0
tr and enrging inænt prrams offere by Idah
Pow that will revn thouans of doll to the diic
* The CSD tok advae of Idao's Off of Ener Re-
sourc, whic ha staff fud on helping schoo find fuding
and resourc fo encint buildin.
APPENDIX AA
OFFICE OF ENERGY RESOURCES
PAUL KJLLADER
Administrtor
322 East Front Str. P.O. Sox 83720
Boise. Idaho 83720
C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER. Govemor
(208) 287-41
. FAX [phone]
c
MEMORAUM OF UNERSTANING
. By and among
The Idao Offce of Energ Resources,
Idaho Power Company,
The Amalgamate Sugar Company, LLC ,
October 9, 2009
Ths Memoradum of Undertadig (MOD) is entered into by the Idao Offce of Energy
Resources (OER), Idaho Power Company (!C), and the Amalgamated Sugar Company (ASC),
refered to herin as "the Pares," for the purose of explorig the feaibility of a Combined
Heat and Power (CHP) project to be located at the Amalgamated Sugar Company's Nampa,
Idaho site.
The purose of ths MOU is to set fort undertadings with respect to a contemplated
opportty, that if found feasible with the context of Idaho Power's Integrted Resource
Plang process, a CHP facility may be built at the ASC's Nampa site.
The Idaho Offce of Energy. Resoures reêgnzes the potential benefits of ths proposed project
to improve Idao's energy resource portfolio, increase source energy utiization effciency, and
reuce envionmental impacts. Moreover, the proposed CHP project to be examed conform
with the goals ofOER's Combined Heat and Power program, which is to foster development of
such projects.
Iii order to explore the feaibilty of ths potential project the pares do agree to the folloWigrectas: .
i. The Idao Offce of Energy Resoures herby comits up to $20,000. of its Deparent of
Energy (DOE) Industal Technologies Prgr (l) grt monies to co-fud contractg of
the consulting experise necssa to condut the feaibilty anyses, the costs of which are
to be shaed eveny betee OER and ipe. Jeff Brooks wil be OER's projec mager.
CHP MOU
JB,OER Pagel
2. Idao Power hereby commits up to $20,000 to co-fud the costs for the consultant contrct(s)
necessar to conduct and complete the feasibilty anlyses, the costs for which are to be
shared evenly between OER and IPC. Karl Bokenkamp wil be Idaho Power's project
manager.
3. Amalgamated Sugar agrees to faciltate the feasibilty analyses process by providing site and
inormation access to accurately determine costs, benefits and operational requirements of
such a project. Mr. Eric Erickson will be the project manager for ASC.
4. Idao Power and The Office of Energy Resources wil jointly select the consulting
contractor(s) to perform the feasibilty analyses. Idao Power wil be responsible to insure
that the consultat contract language contains end-product specifications necessar for input
to Idaho Power's Integrted Resource Plan process. Idaho Power and OER wil jointly
develop contrctor payment milestones and jointly approve payments for completed
milestones. OER wil provide Idao Power with copies of all consultat invoices for the
project, so contrctor costs payment can be accurtely shad between the paries.
Each Par hereby acknowledges their shared goals and individual responsibilties contained in
ths Memorandum of Uriderstanding and agree to fulfill their commitments as so set fort in
good faith. It is fuher agreed that the goal of ths effort is to complete the feasibility analyses in
a reasonable timeframe of 6 months or less, which requires that each par respond to their
commitments in a timely maner that does not unduly delay progress.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Paries hereby execute ths Memorandum of Understanding to
become effective upon the last date wrtten below.
By: Date:
Joe Huff
Title: Chief Operating Offcer
Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC
By: Date:
Dan Minor
Title: Executive Vice President, Operations
Idaho Power Company
By: Date:
Paul Kjellander
Title: Administrator
Idaho Office of Energy Resources
CHP MOU
JB,OER Page 2
APPENDIX BB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
f 29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Sixtieth Legislatue
LEGISLATUR OF TH STATE OF IDAHO
First Regular Session. 2009
IN TH SENATE
SENATE BILL NO. 1123
BY STATE AFFAIS COMMTTEE
AN ACT
RELATING TO PUBLIC UTILITY RATES; AMNDING CHATER 5, TITLE 61, IDAHO
CODE, BY TH ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 61.541, IDAHO CODE, TO
DEFIN A TERM, TO PROVIDE THT PUBLIC UTITY COMMSSION BINING
RATEMAG TRATMENTS AR APPLICABLE WHN COSTS OF A NEW
ELECTRC 'GENERATION FACILIT AR'INCLUDED IN RATES, TO PROVIDE
PROCEDURS AND TO PROVIDE FOR RULES.
Be It Enacted by the Legislatu of the State of Idaho:
SECTION 1. That Chapter 5, Title 61, Idaho Code, be, and the sae is hereby amçnded
by the addition theret of a NEW SECTION, to be known and designated as Section 61.541,
Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
61-541. BINING RATEMAG TRATMNTS APPLICABLE WHN COSTS
OF A NEW ELECTRC GENERATION FACILITY AR INCLUDED IN RATES. (1) As
used in' this section, "certificate" means a certificate of convenience and necessity' issued undersection 61.526, Idaho Code. .
(2) A public utilty that proposes to constrct, leae or purchase an electrc genertionfacilty or transmission facilty, or make major additions to an electric generation or
transmission facilty, may file al application with the commission for an order speifying in
advance the ratemakg treatments that shall apply when the costs of the proposed facilty are
included in the public utilty's revenue requirements for ratemakg púrposes. For puroses
of this section, the requested ratemakg treatments may include nontraditional ratemakg
treatments or nontraditional cost recovery mechanisms.
(a) In its application for an order under this section, a public utilty shall describe the
need for the proposed facilty, how the public utilty addresses the risks associated with
the proposed facilty, the proposed date of the lease or purhas or commenceent of
constction, the public utility's proposa for cost recovery, and any proposed ratemakg.
treatments to be applied to the proposed facilty.
. (b) For puroses of this section, ratemakg tratments for a proposed facilty include but
are not limited to:
(i) The retu on common equity investment or method of determining the retu
on common equity investment;
(ii) The depreciation life or schedule;
(ii) The maxmum amount of costs that the commission wil include in rates at the
time determined by the commission without the public utilty having the burden
of moving forward with additional evidence of the prudence and reasonableness of
such costs;
(iv) The method of handling any variances between cost estates and actual
costs; and
2
1 (V) The treatment of revenues received from wholesale purchasers of service
2 from the proposed facilty.
3 (3) The commission shall hold a public hearing on the application submitted by the
4 public utility under this section. The commission may hold its hearing in conjunction with an
5 application for a certificate.
6 (4) Based upon the hearing record, the commission shall issue an order that addresses
7 the proposed ratemaking treatments. The commission may accept, deny or modify a proposed
8 ratemaking treatment requested by the utilty. In determining the proposed ratemaking
9 treatments, the commission shall maintain a fair, just and reasonable balance of interests
10 between the requesting utility and the utility's ratepayers.
11 (a) In reviewing the application, the commission shall also determine whether:
12 (i) The public utilty has in effect a commission-accepted integrated resource plan;
13 (ii) The services and operations resulting from the facilty are in the public
14 interest and wil not be detrimental to the provision of adequate and reliable15 electric service;
16 (iii) The public utilty has demonstrated that it has considered other sources for'
17 long-term electric supply or transmission;
18 (iv) The addition of the facilty is reasonable when compared to energy effciency,
19 demand-side management and other feasible alternative sources of supply or20 transmission; and
21 (v) The public utilty paricipates in a regional transmission planning process.
22 (b) The commission shall use its best efforts to issue the order setting fort the
23 applicable ratemaking treatments prior to the date of the proposed lease, acquisition or
24 commencement of constrction of the facilty.
25 (c) The ratemaking treatments specified in the order issued under this section shall be
26 binding in any subsequent commission proceedings regarding the proposed facility that is
27 the subject of the order, except as may otherwise be established by law.
28 (5) The commission may not require a public utility to apply for an order under this
29 section.
30 (6) The commission may promulgate rules or issue procedural orders for the purpose of
31 administering this section.
APPENDIX CC - Retail rate for net meterig customers
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
Case No. IPC-E-06-17, Order No. 30227
January 30,2007
Contact: Gene Fadness [phone]
Website: ww.puc.idaho.gov
Net metering customers wi contiue to get retail rate
Net-meterng customers ofIdaho Power Company who generate their own electrcity and sell
their surlus back to the company wil continue to be paid the full retail rate rather than a
wholesale rate. However, an order recently issued by the commission allows the company to
include power supply expenses associated with the net meterng customers in its anual power
cost adjustment (PCA) process for possible recovery from ratepayers.
Idaho Power has about 27 residential and small-business customers who offset their own power
consumption by generating their own power with small hydro, wind or solar projects. Another 13
customers have pending requests for net-meterng generation interconnects.
In August, Idaho Power filed an application with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission to pay
net-meterng residential and small business customers an amount equal to about 85 percent of the
wholesale market rate for electrcity rather than the full retail rate. In December, the company
modified its application to leave the rate paid for excess generation the same. The final order
issued by the commssion leaves the rate the same, but grants Idaho Power's request to recover
expenses associated with the net metering program though its anual power cost adjustment
process. The order also grants the company's request to remove a financial impediment for
customers in classes other than residential and small-businesses to paricipate in net meterng by
removing a requirement that those customers have a second meter.
In its origial application, Idaho Power assered that excess generation from residential and
small-business net metering customers is "non-firm," or interttent. Thus, those customers
should be paid the same rate - a lower wholesale rate - as all sellers of non-firm energy. Under
the curent system of paying full retail rate for excess generation, Idaho Power said it does not
recover its full costs of providing serice to net meterng customers and that those costs are
shifted to the remaining residential and small-business customers who do not have net metering.
Customers do get the full retail rate for all the energy that offsets their own consumption, but, the
company believes that generation in excess of the customer's consumption should be viewed
differently.
The commission said the amount of excess generation sold back to the company by net meterng
customers is not substantial enough to warant a revision to the tarff. The cumulative capacity of
existing net metering projects is 336 kilowatt-hours and the total amount paid for the projects'
excess generation over the past 12 months was $23,102. "Ifthis increased substantially, it would
be necessar to reconsider the pricing of excess generation. There is no need for that
reassessment at ths time," the commssion said.
The commission cautioned potential net meterg customers agaist relying on continuation of
the curent tarff when calculating their investment in net meterg projects. "We must note that
the net meterng program price is a tarff rate. It is not a contract rate. As a taff rate, it is subject
to change," the commssion said. "A peruaive arguent could be made that net meterng
customers are being subsidized by other customers."
A full text ofthe commssion's order, along with other documents related to this case, are
available on the commission's Web site at www.puc.idaho.gov Click on "File Room" and then
on "Electrc Cases" and scroll down to Case No. IPC-E-06-17.
APPENDIX DD
MEORAUM OF UNERTANINGBETW
TH STATE OF IDAHO
AN
IDAHO NATIONAL LAORATORYON ADV ANClG ECONOMIC PROSPER AN ENONMAL
SUSTAIABn.TY THOUGH ENGY SECU
Ou natiai secty an way of lie deon stble, se aforble an eneny
reble energy reou. En th fo Idao an debly cotig to UnedSta energy sety thgh th adcemt of scienee solution is the focu of th
Meradu ofUnder (MOU).
L Background
Th economy and citi of Ido have bee th benfi of ver affble an relileenergy supplies for dede. As reoi iitiçm an globa en maket evolve Ida's
busineses and cits wi be chen to mainain th highy comtive energy poitin .
enjoye in th pas.. . iMee th chenge wil re.deopin a sound energy portolio in Ido tht inludes
divere engy resurce an pr meod tht (l) provde the highes vaue to th
citize of Ido, (2) enures qu stds of envinmenta reou, an (3) fucton as
an efecve secur and stble ener syte whie engig Ida citi to use engy in
th mos efie way pole
As th State buids an energy porlio to mee the demands of th cog de, ther is an
opor to sitaeously bud ne, high-vaue busineses in Id based on inovtiveenergy exon coverion trpo an us for local regional an nation ma. Ido ishome to signcat rene engy reou, cnticay impo engy dibuton cor
enen engy busi, an world-cl energy syem reea delopent, æs
and deonstron progr at th Ida Nationa Laborto. Id's neibog stte. an
Ca prvice poses world-css fo engy, urum an reewable engy reour,
an crticay imort ener trsion cordor. See reonengy deelopment
pahi foced on invative ways to mae th value of these resource is a signca
opporty for Ida, th Rock Moun Regon øn the nation an is an esenl elemt ofth agren.
IT Pupose
The purose of th MOU is to establi a long-ter parerp beee the State ofIdo (State)
an the Ido Nationa Laborto (I) tht wi ret in a sound an sece engy futue fo
Idao and deonsbly contribute to Unite State energy secty. Th agrent also defes
th :fork and mechanism by whi th State an IN will condu th parp.
Ke goal associated with the State / IN pahip, esblied tbghthis MOU, inlude:
. ..
· Developing an implementig mechanisms to prvide inortion, data and advice
necessar for the citien, leader, relator an other staeholder to ma inored
decisions regag energy prodon, trssion and use, includi technology an
imact issues;
· Deeloping inovative approaches to energy exaction, converion and trmision tht wi
benefit Idaho, the region and the nation;
· Developing regiona parerps betee public, prvate, fedeal an trbal entities, to
enance energy-based economic deelopment an energy securty localy, regonay and
nationay;
· Enin Idaho citize' and staoldes' knowledge about local regional and national
energy chllenges and opportties, inludi ways to produce and use energy more
effciently and wisely;
· Providig regutor agenies and staeholder with credble facts and data about energy
development options, appoaches and tehnologies proposed for implementation in Idao and
the region;
· Developing new energy-related busess, reeah, delopment and demonsation projec
in Ida, includi pnvate secto and feder investments; and
· Enhing Idaho's abilty to deelop and attct an outstadi energy businss workforce.
m. Collaboration
i) Jointly, the State and IN will:
· Establih an Energy Invations Extive Roundtble, chired by senor State
and Laboratory offcia, fo th purose of focing on loca regina an
nationa oppores in ener-system developmet;
· Establi vauable regiona stteto-stte and stateto-prvice parershps based
on common economc and enviental inerests and coplita stengt
fo the purse of mazi the vaue of regiona engy reources, businesses
an workforce for loca regiona and nationa stakeholders whie protectig
regiona envionmen an natu resources and quality of life;
· Develop and implement public and steholder outreach mechasms for the
purose of education, awaress and enement of Idao's imge locally,
regionally and nationay in the ar of energy producton an use issues.
· Integrte unverities in Idao though the Center for Advaced Energy Studies
(CABS) to support State and regional reseach opportties.
ü) The IN wil:
· Promote the key goals, object and mechms as arcuted in th MOU
with loc regiona and nationa staolder.
· Provide professiona an tehn assie to the Stat of Idao, Offce of
Energy Resources and other stae agencies, inludig, but not lited to, suppor
for the Idao Strtec Energy Alance Council, Boad, an Task Groups and
relted or correlate activities to ene inormed enrgy-related decisions by
state goverent.
· Work with State offcials, where appropriate to provide assistace in attctg
high-value energy reource industr to Idao.
il) The State ofIdao wil:
· Promote the key goa, objectives, an mechasms as arcuatein th MOU
with loca, regona an nationa staeholde.
APPENDIXEE
C.L "BUTCH" OTTER
GOVERNOR
BX DBAITK
STATB OF lIMBO
BOIS
EXCUIV ORDER NO. 2007-21
ESTABLISHING APOUCY TO REDUCE FOSSIL FUEL USE AN GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS FROM STATE VEHICLES
WHEREAS, the State of Idaho has demonstrated leadership by establishing policies to
redue air pollution, wastejùl, uneconomical and unnsary uses of energ and greenhoue
gas emissions caued by state governent; and
WHEREAS, emisions from vehicles are a major source of greenhouse gas gases in Idaho
as well as a major source of air pollution in Idaho's urban are; and
WHEREAS, to perform their duties and servce the citiens State of Idaho deportents,
offces and agencies own or lease a signifèant fleet of motor vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the State of Idaho can and should lead by example managing its state vehicle
fleet to improve and protect air quality, redue greenhouse gas emissions and rece the amount
offossiljùels purchaed and used; and
WHEREAS, reducingfossil.fel use and increasingjùel effciency in the state's vehicle
fleet wilInot only reduce greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions but will also maimize
effciency in state governent operations and reduce annual operating costs;
NOW, THEREFORE. i, C.L "BUTCH" OTTR, Govemorofth State of Idaho, by the
authority vested in me under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Idaho do hereby order
the following:
1. All executive branch departments, agenies and offes of the State of Idaho shall
decree the amount of gasoline an diesel used in State vehicles by:
a. increasing the .fel economy of its vehicles;
b. increasing the operating effciency; and
c. reucing the number of miles driven by employees.
2. All extive branch departments, agencies and offces of the State of Idaho shall
limit the purchae or lease of four-wheel drive sport utility veicles an similar
specialty vehicles to situatins where there is a clear busines need or the mision
of the entity requires such vehicles. .
3. All executive branch deprtents, agencies and offces of the State of Idaho shall
give priority to the purchase and use of hybrid gas/electrc and other jùel
effcient/ow emision and ne petrleum effcient technology vehicles.
4. The Division of Purchaing wil mak available to all departnts and agencies a
list of available vehicle purchaing contracts, which will identif vehicles that
meet the reqirements of this execve .order. Any purchase outsde this list wil
need written justifcation signd by the diretor or administrator of the entity.
5. The Division of Purchasing will provide the Department of Environmental
Quality and Ofce of the Governor a quarerly vehicle puchaing rert.
~-BE~
SECRETARY OF STATE
IN WITESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused to be affed the Great Seal the State of
Idaho at the Capitol in Boise on this day of
December in. the year of our Lord two thousand and
seven, and of the Independence of the United States of
America the two hundred thirty-second and of the
Statehood of Idaho the one hundred eighteenth.
c.L. "BUTCH" OTTR
GOVERNOR
Co
r
a
c
t

D
e
I
v

D
a
En
g
l
.
.

_
c
a
o
n

o
n

f
l
"v
i
/
O
Bl
d
.
.
.
.
_

T
o
t
R
_
C
W
I
o
El
P
O
'
SB
P
O
'
Orr

Da

(N
L

T
)

(
+
t

d
e
a
u
l
l
Ag
c
y
Ma
.
ß
u
l
a
r
e
Ma
Mo
d

D
r

C
a
t
g
o
Ty
p
(V
e
t
o
t
R
.
.
.
d
l
Oi
r

T
o
t
Vl
h
l
c

C
O
O
8a
n
g
a
l
Bl
d
_
_
1
El
1
4
9
0
SB
P
1
3
0
11
l
3
21
1
l
IC
he
e
I
Ma
l
b
u
H)
'l
D
MD
S
D
N
H)
NR
$2
3
,
3
0
.
0
0
3.
3
0
.
0
0
$0
.
0
0
$2
,
3
1
.
0
0
El
I
4
9
1
SB
P
I
3
0
11
l
3
21
1
l
ic
B
V
I
GM
C
sM
Pa
s

V
a
n
AW
D
Mv
a
n
FF
V
NR
$4
5
,
4
7
8
.
0
0
$2
,
1
3
9
.
0
0
$1
1
,
0
0
.
0
0
$5
8
.
7
8
.
0
0
El
I
4
9
SB
P
1
2
l
ll
n
l
2
2~
IC
Fo
E
35
.2
W
D
FS
V
a
n
Ga
Ve
s
$1
.
9
,
1
7
3
.
0
0
$1
9
,
1
7
3
.
0
0
$7
,
8
.
0
0
$2
,
7
7
3
.
Q
O
El
1
4
9
3
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
31
1
1
1
2
DB
S
GM
C
Sl
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
.
2
.
o
o
$2
.
0
0
$8
.
5
.
0
0
$2
,
7
3
2
.
0
0
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
.
GM
C
Si
e
a
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$4
6
8
.
6
3
U
O
$2
1
.
3
0
1
.
l
l
$1
4
3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$8
1
1
.
6
3
.
6
0
ElP
O
I
4
9
4
.S
B
P
O
I
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
SI
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$4
,
6
3
.
2
0
$2
1
,
4
1
.
8
0
$1
2
3
,
5
.
0
0
$5
1
3
4
.
2
0
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
6
/
ID
F
G
GM
C
SI
25
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$2
,
3
1
6
.
2
$2
,
1
0
9
.
6
9
$7
8
,
0
0
.
0
0
$3
.
3
1
6
.
2
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
6
1
0
0
ID
F
G
GM
C
Si
e
r
25
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$2
e
,
3
0
.
5
9
$2
4
,
2
9
.
6
9
$7
1
,
5
0
.
0
0
$3
7
,
8
0
.
5
9
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Si
r
r
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$4
8
,
6
4
7
.
1
8
$2
4
,
4
2
3
.
5
9
$1
3
.
0
0
.
0
0
$8
1
,
6
4
7
.
1
8
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Vu
k
n
25
0
0
4W
D
5U
Ga
Ve
s
$3
.
7
5
6
.
1
1
$3
,
7
5
6
.
1
1
$8
,
0
0
.
0
0
$3
8
,
7
5
6
.
1
1
EX
P
O
I
4
9
4
SB
P
o
I
3
0
5
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Si
e
a
35
0
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$2
2
1
.
2
2
$2
3
,
5
1
.
2
2
$7
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
2
1
.
2
2
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
1
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Si
e
a
35
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$2
.
8
8
.
5
2
$2
2
.
5
2
$7
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
.
5
2
El
1
4
9
4
SB
P
I
3
0
11
1
1
3
1
2/
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Si
e
a
35
4W
D
CC
Ga
Ve
s
$3
.
0
9
.
6
5
$3
4
,
0
9
.
6
5
$7
,
3
0
.
0
0
$4
1
,
3
9
7
.
6
5
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
5i
25
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$2
,
0
9
7
2
1
$2
5
,
0
9
.
2
1
. $
6
5
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
5
9
7
.
2
1
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Sl
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
4
,
5
2
3
.
5
$2
4
,
5
2
.
5
$8
,
5
.
0
0
$3
1
,
0
2
.
5
9
El
1
4
9
4
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C
Vu
k
n
15
0
0
4W
D
SU
FF
V
NR
$2
.
7
5
2
.
0
3
$2
,
7
5
2
.
0
3
$7
,
3
.
0
0
$3
7
,
0
5
.
0
3
El
1
4
9
4
SB
P
O
I
3
0
11
/
1
3
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
GM
C8
Ex
'l
LD
T
Ga
NR
$1
3
.
6
5
.
5
0
$1
3
.
6
5
.
5
0
$4
.
9
0
.
0
0
$1
8
,
5
.
5
El
1
4
9
5
S8
1
2
7
9
-
0
1
11
1
1
3
1
2/
1
6
1
0
0
ID
F
G
Fo
r
es
H)
4W
D
SU
Hy
NR
$2
6
,
6
.
1
6
$2
8
,
8
0
7
.
1
6
$2
5
.
0
0
$2
,
8
7
.
1
6
El
1
4
9
5
SB
P
1
2
l
11
/
1
4
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
Fo
r
Ex
SS
4W
D
5U
Ga
Ve
s
$2
4
,
8
.
0
0
$2
4
.
8
0
.
0
0
$8
,
8
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
4
0
3
.
0
0
El
1
4
9
5
SB
P
I
2
9
11
/
1
4
1
2/
1
6
1
0
0
ID
F
G
Je
Ch
e
La
4W
D
5U
FF
V
NR
$2
,
6
1
7
.
0
0
$2
,
6
1
7
.
0
0
$9
,
7
0
.
0
0
$3
2
,
3
1
7
.
0
0
EX
P
1
4
9
7
SB
P
1
3
0
11
1
4
1
2/
1
8
1
ID
F
G
Ch
e
Ma
l
i
b
u
fN
d
'l
D
MD
S
D
N
Hy
I
NR
$2
,
3
.
0
0
$2
,
3
1
.
0
0
$0
.
0
0
$2
,
3
0
.
0
0
El
1
4
9
5
S8
1
3
0
11
/
1
4
1
2/
1
7
1
2
PH
D
Ch
e
l
a
Im
p
a
l
a
LS
FW
D
FL
S
D
N
FF
V
NR
$3
3
.
7
1
8
.
0
0
$1
6
,
8
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
7
1
8
.
0
0
El
1
4
9
9
SB
P
I
3
0
11
/
1
4
1
2/
1
7
1
2
IS
P
Ch
e
e
t
Ma
l
i
b
u
LS
FW
D
FL
S
N
Ga
NR
$1
7
,
7
7
9
.
0
0
$1
7
.
7
7
9
.
0
0
$2
5
,
9
4
0
.
0
0
$4
3
,
7
1
9
.
0
0
EX
0
1
5
l
l
SB
P
I
2
9
12
~
2l
0
0
IS
P
Do
e
Ch
a
e
r
LS
'l
D
Fl
N
Ga
s
Ve
s
$3
9
,
7
7
8
.
0
0
$1
9
,
8
8
.
0
0
$9
,
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
7
7
6
.
0
0
EX
0
1
5
l
0
l
SB
P
I
2
9
12
~
2l
0
0
IS
P
Fo
F
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$4
,
3
.
0
0
$2
4
,
1
7
2
.
0
0
$1
4
,
4
0
.
0
0
$6
,
7
-
4
.
0
0
El
I
5
l
SB
O
I
2
9
12
~
2J
IS
P
Je
Ch
e
La
4W
D
SU
V
FF
V
NR
$6
,
6
5
.
0
0
$2
1
,
8
8
.
0
0
$2
9
.
1
0
0
.
0
0
$9
,
7
5
5
.
0
0
El
5
l
SB
O
I
2
9
12
~
2J
IS
P
Fo
r
d
ex
XL
T
4W
O
SU
V
Ga
Ve
s
$2
,
6
9
.
0
0
$2
,
8
.
0
0
$8
.
0
0
.
0
0
$2
8
,
8
9
.
0
0
El
1
5
0
S8
1
2
7
9
-
0
1
11
/
2
1
1
2
12
/
1
9
1
0
0
PT
V
Fo
r
es
H)
l
4W
D
SU
V
Hy
b
NR
$2
,
8
0
.
1
8
$2
,
6
.
1
6
$2
4
9
.
0
0
$2
,
6
5
.
1
6
El
I
5
0
SB
P
I
2
9
11
/
2
1
1
2
2/
1
3
1
ve
S
Fo
r
Fo
c
5E
FW
D
SM
S
d
Ga
NR
$1
2
,
3
8
.
0
0
$1
2
,
3
.
0
0
$3
4
0
.
0
0
$1
5
.
7
8
3
.
0
0
El
1
5
0
3
SB
P
1
2
7
9
-
1
11
~
2
12
/
1
9
1
UB
R
l
e
s
Fo
r
es
Hy
4W
D
5U
Hy
NR
$2
,
8
0
7
.
1
6
$2
,
8
0
.
1
6
$2
.
0
0
$2
8
,
8
5
.
1
8
EX
O
I
5
0
SB
P
0
1
3
0
12
/
1
1
2
21
8
1
lT
CI
Ma
l
i
b
u
fN
d
FW
D

M
O
S
O
N
Hy
NR
$1
6
3
.
9
7
8
.
5
0
$2
3
,
4
2
5
.
5
0
$0
.
0
0
$1
8
3
,
9
7
8
.
5
EX
0
1
5
0
SB
O
I
2
9
12
/
1
1
2
3/
1
1
2
ID
Fo
r
5u
b
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$1
2
1
,
2
.
0
0
$2
,
2
1
1
.
0
0
$4
3
,
2
.
0
0
$1
6
4
,
4
6
.
0
0
El
P
O
I
5
0
SB
P
O
I
2
9
9
12
~
31
/
2
0
0
9
IT
O
Fo
r
Ch
u
l
l
35
2W
D
MD
T
DiH
l
Ve
s
$3
.
3
7
4
.
0
0
$3
0
.
3
7
4
.
0
0
$7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$3
7
,
5
7
4
.
0
0
El
I
5
0
SB
P
O
I
3
0
12
~
3~
IT
O
GM
C
Sl
35
'l
D
MD
T
DI
Ve
s
$2
8
,
3
9
1
.
3
9
$2
3
9
.
:
l
$7
,
5
.
0
0
$3
5
,
8
9
1
.
3
9
El
I
5
0
SB
P
0
3
0
12
/
5
1
3~
11
0
GM
C
Sl
e
a
25
4W
D
MD
T
.
Ga
Ye
s
$2
4
,
1
0
0
.
0
4
$2
4
,
1
0
0
.
0
4
$7
,
0
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
1
0
0
.
0
4
El
I
5
0
SB
P
O
I
3
0
12
~
3~
11
0
GM
C
Si
e
r
25
'l
D
LO
T
Ga
s
Ye
s
$1
6
6
,
3
.
4
5
$1
8
,
4
7
6
.
0
5
$5
,
5
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
8
.
4
5
El
1
5
0
8
SB
P
I
3
0
12
~
3~
lT
GM
C
Sl
25
'l
D
LO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$4
1
,
5
1
3
.
0
4
$2
,
7
5
6
.
5
2
$1
3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
5
1
3
.
0
4
EX
P
I
5
0
SB
P
I
3
0
12
~
31
0
0
lT
GM
C
SI
25
4w
d
LO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$4
2
,
7
8
1
.
1
0
$2
1
,
3
9
0
.
5
5
$1
3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
7
8
1
.
1
0
El
I
5
0
S8
1
3
0
12
~
3~
lT
GM
C
Si
e
r
15
0
2W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$3
9
.
6
8
.
0
0
$1
7
,
4
8
3
.
3
0
$8
.
0
0
.
0
0
$4
3
3
,
6
.
0
0
El
I
5
0
SB
P
I
3
0
12
~
3~
lT
GM
C
Sa
l
l
~V
a
n
2W
O
FS
V
.
n
Ga
s
Ve
s
$3
9
,
9
2
7
.
5
0
$1
9
,
9
8
.
7
5
$1
5
,
8
0
.
0
0
$5
,
5
7
.
5
0
El
1
5
0
8
SB
P
O
I
3
0
12
~
31
0
0
lT
GM
C
Sa
Pa
s

V
a
n
'l
D
FS
V
a
n
Ga
Ve
s
$2
.
9
6
.
5
5
$2
1
,
9
6
.
5
$7
,
8
.
0
0
$2
,
7
8
5
.
5
5
El
1
5
0
8
SB
P
O
I
3
0
12
~
31
5
1
0
0
lT
GM
C
C&
n
n
Ex

C
a
b
'l
D
LO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$8
1
.
3
2
7
.
2
0
$1
5
,
3
3
1
.
0
0
$1
9
,
8
0
.
0
0
$8
,
9
2
.
2
0
El
I
5
0
S8
1
2
9
12
/
5
1
3~
lT
Fo
r
Ch
35
2W
D
MD
T
DI
Ve
s
$2
4
.
8
0
7
.
0
0
$2
4
,
8
0
7
.
0
0
$6
,
8
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
0
6
.
0
0
El
1
5
1
0
SB
P
1
2
9
12
/
1
1
1
2
3/
1
1
1
2
PH
0
7
C
Fo
r
d
Fo
SE
FW
D
SM
S
d
n
Ga
NR
$2
5
.
7
9
2
.
0
0
$1
2
,
8
9
1
.
0
0
$8
,
8
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
8
.
0
0
EX
P
1
5
1
1
S8
1
3
0
12
/
1
5
1
3/
1
8
1
AG
I
C
Su
~
Wa
g
AW
D
MD
S
D
N
Ga
NR
$2
,
1
9
3
.
0
0
$2
,
1
9
3
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
1
9
3
.
0
0
El
1
5
1
2
SB
P
0
1
3
0
12
/
1
5
1
3/
1
8
1
IS
P
B
Do
e
Gr
a
n
d

C
a
a
n
SX
FW
D
Mv
a
n
Ga
NR
$2
.
0
3
2
.
0
0
$2
,
0
3
.
0
0
$2
,
5
.
0
0
$2
,
5
3
2
.
0
0
El
1
5
1
3
SB
P
O
I
2
9
9
12
/
1
9
1
3~
PH
D
3
B
Do
e
Av
e
n
2W
D
MD
S
D
N
Ga
NR
$1
4
,
2
.
0
0
$1
4
,
2
.
0
0
$4
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
,
5
0
:
0
0
El
P
0
1
5
1
3
SB
P
O
I
2
9
12
/
1
9
1
3~
PH
D
3
B
Fo
r
d
F
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$1
8
,
5
0
0
$1
8
,
5
.
0
0
$7
,
2
.
0
0
$2
,
7
0
8
.
0
0
EX
P
1
5
1
4
-
1
SB
P
0
1
3
0
1
12
/
9
1
3~
ID
L
A
Do
e
Ra
m
25
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ye
s
$1
8
.
8
7
8
.
0
0
$1
8
.
8
7
8
.
0
0
$1
0
,
5
.
0
0
$2
,
1
7
8
.
0
0
El
1
5
1
5
S8
1
3
O
12
1
3l
0
0
Ii
C
B
Ch
e
r
o
Im
p
a
LS
FW
D
MD
S
D
N
FF
V
NR
$3
,
3
4
.
0
0
$1
8
.
1
7
3
.
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
.
0
0
$4
,
3
.
0
0
El
1
5
1
6
SB
P
I
3
0
1~
9
WI
tD
B
GM
C
Si
e
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$1
9
,
7
7
4
.
6
0
$1
9
.
7
7
4
.
8
0
$8
,
5
0
.
0
0
$2
4
.
8
0
El
1
5
1
7
SB
P
O
I
3
0
1~
9
WI
AG
R
I
B
Su
b
a
Ou
a
c
Wa
g
AW
O
MD
S
O
N
Ga
s
NR
$2
0
.
1
9
3
.
0
0
$2
0
,
1
9
3
.
0
0
$2
.
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
1
æ
.
0
0
El
1
.
5
1
8
SB
P
0
3
0
1~
9
WI
ID
B
GM
C
SI
e
r
25
4W
D
MO
T
Ga
s
Ve
s
$2
4
,
2
9
.
4
8
$2
4
,
2
3
9
.
4
8
$7
.
0
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
2
3
9
.
4
8
El
1
5
1
9
SB
P
I
3
0
1~
2
41
1
2
ID
L
A
Ch
e
SU
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$3
1
,
8
.
0
3
$3
1
,
8
4
.
0
3
$6
0
0
.
0
0
$3
7
,
8
4
.
0
3
El
I
5
2
0
SB
P
I
3
0
1~
2
4/
7
1
2
PH
D
5
B
GM
C
C&
n
n
ex
i
'l
D
LO
T
Ga
s
NR
$1
2
,
0
4
.
8
5
$1
2
,
0
4
.
8
5
$4
.
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
,
0
4
.
8
5
'E
l
I
5
2
1
SB
P
2
9
1~
2
41
2
1
2
PH
D
5
B
Fo
r
Fo
c
SE
2W
O
SM
S
d
Ga
NR
$2
5
,
1
4
0
.
0
0
$1
2
,
5
7
0
.
0
0
$8
,
8
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
9
4
.
0
0
ix
I
5
2
2
-
U
1
SB
P
I
3
0
1~
2
4/
7
1
2
ID
P
B
GM
C
C&
n
n
Ex
2W
D
LO
T
Ga
NR
$1
3
,
5
.
6
5
$1
3
,
5
8
0
.
6
5
$4
.
9
0
.
0
0
$1
8
.
4
8
0
.
6
5
ix
l
5
2
-
U
1
SB
P
I
3
0
1~
2
41
1
2
IO
P
R
B
GM
Si
e
25
0
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
3
,
3
3
5
.
4
9
$2
3
,
3
3
5
.
4
9
$8
.
1
9
4
.
5
3
$2
,
5
3
.
0
2
El
1
5
2
SB
P
1
3
0
21
5~
IS
L
C
GM
C
Yu
k
25
4W
D
SU
V
Ga
Ve
s
$2
,
5
3
.
7
0
$2
,
5
3
.
7
0
$5
.
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
5
.
7
0
t;
-
El
I
5
2
4
SB
P
O
I
3
0
2/1
7
/
2
0
0
5/
1
7
1
2
IT
O
B
GM
Sl
25
4W
D
MD
T
Ga
Ve
s
$2
4
.
3
0
.
0
4
$2
4
,
3
0
.
0
4
$7
,
0
.
0
0
$3
1
,
3
0
.
0
4
EX
I
5
2
SB
P
I
3
0
31
4
1
6~
ID
P
R
C
GM
Ca
ex
t
2W
D
LO
T
Ga
NR
$1
8
,
8
2
.
0
0
$1
8
,
8
2
.
0
0
$4
.
9
0
.
0
0
$2
3
,
7
2
8
.
0
0
~
El
P
O
I
5
2
SB
P
O
I
3
0
31
4
1
6/
4
1
ID
P
R
A
Ch
e
e
t
CO
r
a
d
Cr
'l
D
LO
T
Ga
NR
$1
5
,
9
0
.
5
3
$1
5
,
9
0
.
5
3
$4
,
9
.
0
0
$2
,
9
0
.
5
3
El
P
0
1
5
2
7
S8
1
3
0
1
3/
1
0
1
0
0
6/1
0
1
0
0
ID
L
A
Do
e
Ra
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$1
8
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$1
8
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
$8
,
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
9
3
9
.
0
0
~
El
P
O
I
5
2
7
SB
P
1
3
0
1
3/
1
0
i
6/1
0
1
0
0
ID
L
A
Do
e
Ra
25
4W
D
LO
T
Ga
Ye
s
$3
7
,
9
8
.
0
0
$1
8
,
9
9
:
0
0
$2
1
,
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
9
8
.
0
0
..
El
P
O
I
5
2
8
SB
P
I
2
9
3/
1
0
i
6/1
0
1
0
0
ID
L

A
Fo
d
F
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$1
7
,
5
1
.
0
0
$1
7
.
5
6
1
.
0
0
$7
,
2
0
0
.
0
0
$2
4
.
7
8
1
.
0
0
~
El
1
5
2
9
SB
P
I
3
0
3~
81
0
0
ID
P
C
GM
C
Si
e
r
15
0
4W
D
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
3
,
0
4
2
.
8
4
$2
3
.
0
4
2
.
8
4
$8
.
7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
7
4
2
.
8
4
Z
El
I
5
2
9
SB
P
O
I
3
0
3~
61
3
/
2
0
0
iD
C
GM
Si
e
r
r
15
0
4W
O
LD
T
FF
V
NR
$2
3
,
0
4
2
.
6
4
$2
3
,
0
4
2
.
8
4
$6
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
9
,
7
4
2
.
6
4
~~~~
co
n

D
e
e
r

D
e
En
.
.
.
.

J
_
i
o

o
n

f
i
l
e
Av
g
1
0
r
ai
d

A
s
s
l
_

T
è
l
_

C
W
EX
.
O
t
l
SB
P
O
t
I
On
D
a
IN
L
T
)

1
-

d
e
a
u
l
Ag
AR
i

M
a
n
u
f
c
l
.
.
MI
l
o
M_
D_

C
a
Ty
p
e
(Y
o
a

R
e
q
d
)
Or
d
e
T
è
l
V_
C
O
O
IS
a
I
al
i
_
I
EX
l
5
2
SB
l
3
0
3~
6/
3
1
IO
P
R
C
GM
SI
15
0
~W
O
LO
T
FF
V
.
NR
52
,
0
2
.
8
4
52
,
0
4
2
.
8
4
$6
.
7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
4
2
.
8
4
EX
l
~
3
0
SB
P
l
3
0
3~
ll
10
P
R
C
GM
SI
a
15
0
~W
O
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
,
9
.
4
4
$2
,
9
.
.
$6
7
0
.
0
0
$2
.
6
6
.
4
4
EX
1
5
3
0
SB
P
l
3
0
3~

6
~
IO
P
C
Je
e
Ub
sp
o
~W
O
$U
Ga
Ye
s
52
,
0
4
2
.
8
$2
3
,
0
4
.
8
4
$6
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
~
2
.
8
4
EX
1
5
3
0
SB
P
1
3
0
3~
ll
IO
P
R
C
Je
e
Ub
Sp
~W
O
SU
V
Ga
Ye
s
$2
,
1
7
2
.
0
0
$2
0
,
1
1
2
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
.
0
0
52
,
1
7
2
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
1
1
SB
P
0
1
3
0
3~
ll
IO
P
C
Je
Ub
o
Sp
4W
Ò
SU
V
Ga
Ye
s
$2
1
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
$2
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$2
4
,
1
9
5
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
SB
P
1
3
0
3~
ll
IO
P
C
Je
e
Ch
e
e
e
Li
4W
O
SI
FF
V
NR
$1
9
,
8
.
0
0
$1
9
,
8
1
.
0
0
$9
.
7
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
5
1
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
SS
P
Q
1
3
0
1
3/
3
1
ll
IO
P
A
Do
e
Ca
l
i
b
SX
T
mo
MO
O
N
Ga
NR
$1
3
,
9
0
.
0
0
$1
3
,
9
0
.
0
0
$2
,
5
.
0
0
$1
8
,
4
0
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
SB
1
2
9
31
6I
BS
a
Fo
r
F
35
2W
0
MO
T
Ga
Ye
s
$1
9
,
6
6
.
5
$1
9
,
1
3
.
5
$7
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$2
7
6
2
EX
5
3
SS
P
0
1
2
9
31
1
1
2
7/
1
1
2
10
P
R
A
Fo
r
d
R~
XL
2W
0
LO
T
Ga
NR
$1
~
,
2
4
3
.
0
0
$1
~
,
2
3
.
0
0
$4
,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$1
8
,
9
4
3
.
0
0
EX
5
3
6
SB
P
1
2
9
31
1
1
2
7/1
1
2
0
0
IO
P
A
Fo
r
F
15
0
~W
O
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$1
8
,
5
8
.
0
0
$1
8
,
5
8
3
.
0
0
$7
,
2
.
0
0
$2
,
7
8
.
0
0
EX
l
5
3
9
SB
P
l
2
9
4~
7~
6
IS
P
a
Fo
r
d
F
15
0
~W
O
LO
T

F
F
V
NR
$5
,
1
2
8
.
0
0
$1
3
,
5
.
0
$2
,
8
0
.
0
0
$7
6
,
9
2
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
SB
P
l
2
9
4~
7~
6
IO
A
Fo
r
d
F
15
0
4W
O
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
0
,
1
5
3
.
0
0
$2
,
1
5
3
.
0
0
$7
,
2
.
0
0
$2
7
,
3
5
3
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
7
.
Q
1
SB
P
1
2
9
9
4~
7~
6
IO
a
Do
Ra
25
~W
O
LO
T
Ga
Ve
s
$1
7
,
9
7
0
.
0
0
$1
7
.
9
7
0
.
0
0
$1
0
.
.
0
0
$2
,
4
7
0
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
7
SS
P
O
l
2
9
4~
7~
6
IO
P
A
Fo
r
F
45
4W
O
HO
T
Ga
Ye
s
$2
7
,
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
0
0
.
0
0
$7
,
0
0
.
0
0
$3
,
0
5
.
0
0
EX
1
5
3
SS
P
0
1
2
9
4~
7~
6
IO
P
A
Fo
r
~
Hy
~W
O
SI
Hy
b
r
d
NR
$1
7
,
6
8
.
0
0
$1
7
,
8
8
.
0
0
$4
.
0
.
0
0
$2
1
,
8
8
.
0
0
EX
5
4
2
SB
1
3
0
4~
7~
8
FI
N
a
Do
C_
a
n
SX
FW
D
MY
a
n
Ga
s
NR
52
,
0
3
.
0
0
52
,
0
3
.
0
0
$2
,
5
.
0
0
$2
0
0
EX
l
5
4
1
SB
P
l
3
0
1
4I
7~
8
FI
N
a
Ho
CM
c
Hy
r
i
d
2W
0
MD
S
O
Hy
NR
52
,
6
6
.
0
0
52
,
6
6
.
0
0
$0
.
0
0
52
,
6
6
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
3
SB
P
1
2
9
9
.i
1
1
2
71
2
1
1
2
CO
R
R
a
Do
Ni
t
SE
~W
O
SI
Ga
Ve
s
$1
8
9
,
6
5
1
.
0
0
$1
7
,
2
4
1
.
0
0
$4
,
9
5
.
0
0
$2
6
0
1
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
3
SB
P
1
2
9
.i
1
1
2
71
2
1
1
2
CO
R
B
Do
Av
e
e
r
SE
2W
0
MO
S
O
P2
E
NR
$2
,
4
0
6
.
0
0
$1
~
,
2
.
0
0
$8
,
6
0
.
0
0
$3
7
,
(
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
SS
P
0
1
2
9
4I
7l
1
IS
P
a
Do
e
Ch
e
r
LS
2W
0
FL
S
Ga
Ve
s
$2
1
,
2
.
0
0
$2
1
,
2
8
3
.
0
0
$8
,
5
.
0
0
$2
9
,
7
8
3
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
SS
P
O
l
3
0
4~
7~
2
DA
I
R
Y
B
Do
e
Gr
C
_
a
n
SX
T
FW
D
Mv
Ga
NR
$2
,
3
6
1
.
0
0
$2
5
,
3
8
1
.
0
0
$2
,
5
0
.
0
0
$2
7
,
8
9
1
.
0
0
EX
l
5
4
SB
1
2
9
51
1
2
1
8/
1
1
1
2
0
0
CO
R
R
B
Fo
r
d
El5
0
XL
2W
O
FS
V
a
n
Ga
Ye
s
$9
,
4
3
.
0
0
$1
8
,
0
6
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$1
2
5
,
4
.
0
0
EX
1
5
4
6
SB
P
O
l
2
9
51
1
2
1
8/
1
1
1
2
0
0
CO
R
R
B
Fo
r
d
63
5
XL
2W
0
FS
V
a
n
Ga
Ye
s
$3
8
,
3
.
0
0
$1
9
,
1
7
3
0
0
$1
5
,
2
.
0
0
$5
,
5
4
.
0
0
EX
P
1
5
4
SB
P
1
2
9
5/
1
2
1
8/
1
1
1
2
CO
R
R
B
Fo
r
E3
XL
2W
0
FS
V
a
n
Ga
Ve
s
$2
,
7
8
1
.
0
0
$2
0
,
7
8
1
.
0
0
$6
.
0
0
.
0
0
$2
.
7
8
1
.
0
0
EX
P
l
5
5
3
SB
P
0
1
3
0
2
6~
ll
IS
P
B
GM
C
SI
15
0
~W
O
LO
T
FF
V
NR
$2
4
,
3
5
1
.
1
8

$
2
4
,
3
5
1
.
1
8
$8
,
5
.
0
0
$3
,
8
1
.
1
8
EX
O
l
5
5
3
SS
P
0
1
3
0
6~
ll
IS
P
B
G
M
C
si
e
25
0
~W
O
LO
T
Ga
Ye
s
$5
1
8
4
.
9
4
$2
,
5
9
2
.
~
7
$1
3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$8
,
1
8
4
.
9
4
EX
1
5
4
SS
P
0
1
3
0
8I
lI
tS
P
B
Do
Ch
e
r
LS
mo
FL
S
O
N
Ga
s
Ye
s
$1
0
4
.
9
1
5
.
0
0
$2
,
9
8
.
0
0
$4
,
0
0
.
0
0
$1
4
6
9
1
5
.
0
0
EX
l
5
5
SS
P
0
1
2
9
6/
1
2
1
91
2
1
CO
R
R
a
Fo
r
d
63
5
XL
mo
FS
V
a
n
Ga
ve
s
$2
,
8
1
0
.
0
0
$2
,
7
8
1
.
0
0
$8
0
,
0
0
.
0
0
$2
8
7
,
8
1
0
.
0
0
EX
1
5
5
1
SB
l
3
0
8/
1
9
1
91
1
9
1
OH
.
S
H
N
A
Ch
e
l
e
Im
p
a
l
a
LS
FW
D
MO
S
O
N
FF
V
NR
$1
7
.
7
0
.
8
3
$1
7
,
7
0
.
8
3
$5
,
0
0
.
0
0
$2
2
,
7
0
8
.
8
3
EX
l
5
5
1
SB
P
O
l
3
0
6/
1
9
1
91
1
9
1
OH
W
.
S
H
N
A
Ch
Im
p
a
LS
FW
D

M
O
S
O
N
FF
V
NR
$1
8
,
2
.
0
0
$1
8
,
2
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
.
0
0
$2
3
,
2
8
.
0
0
EX
1
5
5
2
SB
P
0
1
3
0
6/
.
i
0
0
91
.
i
PH
1
A
Su
b
tm
p
r
AW
O
MO
S
O
P2
E
NR
$1
8
.
0
0
.
0
0
$1
6
,
0
0
.
0
0
$5
.
0
0
$1
8
,
5
.
0
0
EX
1
5
4
9
-
7/
1
1
2
12
1
1
5
1
IS
P
B
Do
Ch
a
e
r
LS
2W
0
FL
S
Ga
Ye
s
$7
3
,
8
9
.
0
0
$2
1
,
0
5
.
0
0
$3
,
0
0
.
0
0
$l
,
0
,
8
.
o
o
28
1
.
0
0
$5
,
8
1
3
,
2
7
7
8
1
$
20
.
6
8
7
.
9
2
$1
.
7
8
1
.
7
1
3
.
5
$7

,
5
7
~
,
9
9
.
1
~
Ne
t
Re
t
5a
n
i
97
FF
V
:I
.
5
'
l
I
r
-
t
O
i
C
o

a
n
d

s
i
i
i
i
$5
,
8
1
3
,
2
7
.
6
1
$7
,
5
7
4
.
9
9
1
.
1
~
$1
,
7
8
1
.
7
1
3
.
5
3
14
Hy
~.
O
%

A
_

C
o

a
n

S
a
v
i
n
g
s
$2
0
,
6
8
7
.
8
2
$2
8
,
9
5
7
.
2
6
$8
,
2
.
4
4
16
4

G
a
s
58
.
4
%

T
O
l

P
e

S
a
v
23
.
3
%
3
Ga
P
2
1.1
%
3
Di
e
1.1
%
28
1

T
o
t
V
e
h
l
c
EO

2
0
7
-
2
1

J
u
s
t
l

R
e
q
r
e
e
n
Al
(2
8
1
1

Le

I
S
P

P
u
n
u
i
t

(
2
3
8
)
No
t

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
13
3
47
%
58
%
Ve
s
=
14
8
53
%
YE
S

ß
e
s

I
S
P
I
10
i
44
%
APPENDIX GG