20230322Formal Complaint.pdf

COMPLAINT
To:Jan Noriyuki
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
PO Box 83720
Boise,ID 83720-0074
Date:March 20,2023
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho [83406]
RE:Installation of "Smart"Meter and threat of service disconnection
Dear Sir,
This COMPLAINT was originally submitted by me to ATTORNEY GENERAL Raúl R.
Labrador at the suggestion of Peggy Edwards of Rexburg,Idaho.Peggy mentioned that she spoke
briefly with Raúl R.Labrador in Boise on January 17,2023 about her challenges with ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP and their attempt to force the installation of a smart meter on
her home against her will and consent.He encouraged her at that time to submit her COMPLAINT
to his OFFICE of the ATTORNEY GENERAL.I felt it important to submit this same COMPLAINT
to you as well for your own investigation.Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I am a 99-year old widow,legally blind,deaf,and hyper-electro sensitive,currentlyfaced
with the real possibility of having my power/electrical service disconnected in less than 15 days (see
disconnect letter,dated March 1,2023,Exhibit A).I have attempted over and over again,in good
faith to resolve all issues with ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP which have led up to
this point where they are now threatening to shut my power off,in spite of the fact that I have always
paid my power bill each month and am currently not late with payment.They,in turn are the
aggressor operating in bad faith,using strong-arm intimidation tactics,threat,duress,and coercion
in order to unlawfullyforce their will upon me and my private property while silencing my legitimate
claim(s)against them.It is important for you to understand that ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP has not responded to any of my timely correspondence,which includes a
conditional offer to resolve the issues between us.They have arrogantly and contemptuously
remained silent on all my documents,documents to which they have a legal and moral obligation to
speak.Silence,as you well know is indicative of fraud and bad faith.
This COMPLAINT arises over matters concerning myself and ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP in regards to their intention to install a "Trespassing Technology"known as
a "Smart"type meter on my home,located at 5447 E Hacienda Dr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho,contrary to
my existing and long-standing contractual agreement with them,as well as my will and consent.
Please find attached my DECLARATION in the form of an AFFIDAVIT in support of this
letter of COMPLAINT,along with supporting Exhibits A,B,C,D,E,F,G,and H.
Last year,I received an undated and unsigned letter from ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP (see Exhibit B)on or around November 22,2022 instructing me to call their
800 number within 15 days to resolve any "access"issues and set an appointment to have my electric
CASE NO. PAC-E-23-04
meter updated with their smart meter (Trespassing Technology).Instead of calling the 800 number
I decided to write them a letter (see Exhibit C)along with my attached CONDITIONAL
ACCEPTANCE dated December 1,2022 (see Exhibit D),conditionally accepting their offer to
install a smart meter (Trespassing Technology)on my home,giving them 15 days to respond to said
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE and other documents (see COURTESY NOTICE,Exhibit E;
NOTICE OF FAULT,Exhibit F;NOTICE OF DEFAULT,Exhibit G;and NOTICE OF
ESTOPPEL,Exhibit H)which followed,all of which they have failed to answer as required,putting
them in DEFAULT.Also included with my letter was their original letter,which I returned to them
with my "Returned for Cause"statement (see Exhibit B)written on it.Please note that one set of
original documents was sent to the return address on their mailing envelope at P.O.Box 400,
Portland,Oregon 97207,and the other set of original documents to the address on the letterhead
inside their mailing envelop at 1407 West North Temple,Salt Lake City,Utah 84126.
On March 12,2023,I received another unsigned letter (see Exhibit A)stating that this is a
"SECOND NOTICE:Required Access for Meter Upgrade at 5447 E Hacienda Dr Idaho Falls,
ID",and that their contractor was refused "access"to perform a meter (Trespassing Technology)
exchange,knowing full well that they are already in DEFAULT by tacit acquiescence,therefore
having no standing to proceed.This new letter also states that I am to call their 800 number to resolve
this issue within 15 days,or they will refer my account to their service disconnection process.Be
advised that this issue/matter has already been resolved as a result of ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP's tacit acquiescence due to their silence on all my series of documents which
they received.In this letter they also claim that I am "contractuallyobligated to allow"ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP "safe and unencumbered access to our equipment.Meter
service is a condition of electric service,as expressed in the Idaho Public Utilities Commission's
Customer Relations Rules,namely Electric Service Regulation No.6,..."Please be aware that the
word/term "access"in ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's letters to me is being
improperly applied to mean something other than what it really is (see explanation below).
INTRODUCTION (BRIEFHISTORY]
As it stands now,there has been in place for the past 37 or so years a relationship of a
"contractual"nature between myself and ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP (formally
UTAH POWER AND LIGHT),who currentlyprovides me with electrical power to my home.I,in
turn naturally,have agreed to allow ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's (formerly
UTAH POWER AND LIGHT)meter reader(s)"access"of a "specified and limited"nature,not a
general unspecified and unlimited nature,to my private property each month specifically for them
to read my electrical power meter ONLY.No other access to my private property,implied or
otherwise was ever granted to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP (formerly UTAH
POWER AND LIGHT)at any time.Any other necessary "access",includingtroubleshooting power
outages and making necessary repairs to electrical equipment located on my private property is
considered "special"in nature and would only be granted at the time,I,the private property owner
reported a power outage and or requested them to troubleshoot an electrical problem and make
necessary repairs ONLY.Therefore,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP (formally
UTAH POWER AND LIGHT)does not have autonomous authority in and of itself to access my
private property to troubleshoot and or make necessary repairs to electrical equipment or for any
other reason at any time,day or nightuntil they receive notification from me authorizing and granting
them permission at that time,on a one-time case-by-case basis only for them to proceed to do the
specified request.Anythingother than this is a trespass,invasion of my privacy,security,unalienable
Rights,includingmy private property rights which cannot be diminished,as well as a violation of
our long-standing and existing contractual agreement.
Let me be clear on this issue of "access"which ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP claims that I am denying them.I and no one else in my home has ever denied
COMPL AINT 2
"access"to any of ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's meter readers or their company
repair personnel as per our previously agreed upon terms of our long-standing contractual agreement
over the years.However,there has never been in place any agreement for personnel from any third-
party company to trespass on my private property and tamper with my,in this case electrical meter
at any time,whether I am at home or if no one is at home,neither has there ever been in place any
agreement with ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP to "access"my private property to
make a non-repair (or install a Trespassing Technology)when no request for such type of service
was ever made,and no defective electrical equipment on my private property exists.So,if no
defective electrical equipment exists on my private property and I did not call ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP to report any troubles/problems with my electrical service and thus no
electrical repairs were/are needed,what are there personnel doing on my private property and or
attempting to access my private property without my consent,which they know is contrary to our
existing contractual agreement?
Understandthat this whole issue surrounds a matter of an existing "contract"which ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP are attempting to impair my obligation to.This contractual
relationship,as I said before has been in place since we built our home about 37 years ago when we
requested ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP (previously UTAH POWER ANDLIGHT)to install an analog electric meter (not a Trespassing Technology)and supply our home
with electrical power,to which they agreed.This has worked smoothly without any problems or
disputes until last year,when ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP attempted to change
the terms of our previously agreed upon and long standing "contract"without any prior proper
notification or full disclosure that they were attempting to change said terms of or initiate a new
contract without my knowledge and consent in order for them to bully their way onto my private
property to make a non-repair (or install a Trespassing Technology)which is not part of our existing
contractual agreement.
As you well know,for any changes to be made to a contract,both parties must be,in
agreement,and both parties must have clear understandingof any and all terms and changes in terms
of said contract to be valid and binding.This is simply not the case in this matter.To allow this abuse
to continue would be a travesty of justice.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP
acknowledges the existence of our contractual relationship (see Exhibit A)but in a skewed and
twisted fashion,not relating the matter truthfully.They propagate deceptions and lies that the smart
meter is safe and the homeowner is the antagonist and an uncooperative party for not wanting their
smart meter (Trespassing Technology),making us the "bad guy".This is like thugs attempting to
break into your home and you resisting them,and then having them go to the authorities complaining
that the homeowner is being uncooperative by not letting them into their home.This is indeed a
criminal mentalityto which the PUC/Legislature justturns a blind eye to.Why is it that the IDAHO
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION/Legislaturesupports/sanctions this type of criminal behavior
and never comes to the aide of the customers?This seems to be a common practice from state to
state and the people/inhabitants nearly always ends up with the short end of the stick.
There is no one or agency in the Idaho government advocating for the people/inhabitants in
their plight with ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP,but there is a government agency
advocating for ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's position -the IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION.It is clear that this agency does not operate in the best interest of the
people/inhabitants of Idaho primarily because their hands are tied by the legislature.This whole
picture is a one-sided equation not in my favor or other customers.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP is now assuming and presuming that they
have the right to alter our existing long-standing contractual relationship without our knowledge and
consent anytime they please implying that they can come onto my private property anytime they
please to do whatever they wish,which they cannot.
Understand,I have committed no wrong in this instant matter and have done my due
diligence in an attempt to resolve all issues in order to keep the peace and my electric power on.
COMPLAINT 3
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP on the other hand have completely ignored my
timely CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE and follow-up documents,choosing to stand mute.They
have acted in bad faith and continue to walk in dishonor.Their silence is palpable and unacceptable.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP is a huge corporate giant with endless
financial resources coming against this small single family who only desires to live in peace.This
huge corporate giant seems to think that because they operate as a government sanctioned monopoly,
knowing that customers have no other option or choice in power companies,they can justrun rough
shod over their perceived disobedient customers to force their unlawful will (Trespassing
Technology)upon them by use of deception,lies,strong-arm intimidation tactics,threat,duress,and
coercion (all criminal acts)in order to covertlyalter a previously agreed upon "contract"without my
knowledge and consent -HOLDING MY ELECTRICAL POWER SERVICE AS RANSOM.
This is a matter of the big bully on the block going around breaching the peace,terrorizing
and strong-arming the inhabitants in the neighborhoodsand bullying their way onto their customer's
private property and into their private lives.This is criminal behavior and it must be stopped.
FACTUAL COUNTS
I,Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,hereinafter referred to as complainant,in pro per,complaining of
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP and their Trespassing Technology,respectfully
alleging various felonious acts being perpetrated upon complainant as follows:
COUNT 1:Breach of the Peace.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's attempted
unlawful intrusion onto complainant's private property and into complainant's home by way of a
smart meter (Trespassing Technology)wire-tapping device,resulting in a breach of complainant's
peace causing undue fear,severe anxiety,mental fatigue,as well as physical and emotional stress.
COUNT 2:Attempted Extortion of complainant's will,consent,and rights through use of threat,
duress,and coercion in order to induce complainant to capitulate,by wrongful use of fear and
under color of official right to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP's unlawful
compulsion to accept their smart meter (Trespassing Technology)while holding the threat of
electrical service disconnection over complainant's head.
COUNT 3:Impairment of Contract.Impairment of complainant's obligation of an existing
contract between ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP and complainant by use of threat,
deception,strong-arm intimidationtactics,trickery,duress,and coercion.Violators are attempting
to change terms of an existing contract and or create a new contract with complainant in order to
install a "smart"meter (Trespassing Technology)without the authorization/consentof complainant
by wrongful use of fear and under color of official right,hoping complainant will grant coerced or
tacit agreement for such contract changes by either omitting to perform a particular act or through
the performance of a particular act induced under compulsion in order to get their smart meter
(Trespassing Technology)installed on complainant's home.
COUNT 4:Attempted Extortion.Attempted extortion and takeover of complainant's private
property for commercial use.Violators,by wrongful use of fear and under color of official right
are attempting to commandeer complainant's private property in order to install a smart Meter
"relay station"(Trespassing Technology)on complainant's property for the sole benefit of
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP and outside third-partyentities without any just
authorization and compensation to complainant for such.This would amount to theft,unlawful
conversion of private property,unjustenrichment,and violation of complainant's FIFTH
AMENDMENT right to not be deprived of complainant's right to life,liberty,or property,without
due process of law.
COMPLAINT 4
Note:If attempted murder is prosecutable,then attempted extortion by use of threat,duress,and
coercion is also prosecutable.
COUNT 5:Attempted Illegal Wiretapping.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP is
attempting to illegallywiretap complainant's home and extract personal and private information
without a lawfullyissued and or executed search warrant,through the installation of an unlawful
(as no consent is given)surveillance/bugging device known as a smart meter (Trespassing
Technology).Smart meter capabilities include,but not limited to monitoring,logging,storing,
transferring,and sharing of daily personal and private habits and routines of occupants of private
homes and then giving said informationto unauthorized third-parties for profit,includingpolice
and federal government snoop agents,all without the homeowner's or other occupants consent to
do so.This would amount to gross violation of complainant's FOURTH AMENDMENT right to
be secure in complainant's person,houses,papers,and effects,against unreasonable searches and
seizures,as well as complainant's FIFTH AMENDMENT right to not be deprived of
complainant's right to life,liberty,or property,without due process of law.
COUNT 6:Threat with Intent to Commit Harm to complainant and other household members by
threatening to shut off electrical power to complainant's property/house if complainant does not
allow ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP to install a smart meter (Trespassing
Technology)on complainant's house.Termination of electrical power will cause severe hardship,
stress,and duress,as well as severe physical and emotional harm to this already frail 99-year-old
complainant.
COUNT 7:Gross Negligence;Hazardous Negligence.The "gross negligence",or reckless and
wanton behavior of ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP is manifest in their failure to
exercise even slight care,and evidences a reckless disregard of complainant's life and safety,as
well as of others in complainant's household,by attempting to expose us to the dangerous/
hazardous health effects of a smart meter (Trespassing Technology)which they are attempting to
install on complainant's private property against complainant's will and consent.There intentionalfailuretoperformamanifestdutytotruthfullyinformcomplainantoftheactualdangersofasmart
meter is in reckless disregard of the consequences as affecting complainant's life and property,includinga gross want of care and regard for complainant's rights and the rights of others in
complainant's household.
Their behavior is also "hazardous negligence"due to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/
PACIFICORP's careless or reckless conduct by attempting to expose complainant and other
members of complainant's householdto the very great danger of injury and imminent peril should
the installation of their smart meter (Trespassing Technology)on complainant's home take place.
COUNT 8:Actionable Fraud.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP has committed an
"actionable fraud"against complainant by use of deceptive practices in an attempt to induce
complainant to part with complainant's legal right(s),to include complainant's long-standing
existing contractual agreement with ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP,as well asunlawfullyattemptingtocommandeercomplainant's private property for commercial use byinstallinga"relay station"(smart meter Trespassing Technology)without complainant's consent
by making false representations with the intention to deceive.Further,it appears that ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP makes a material representationwhich is knowinglyfalse
concerning their smart meter (Trespassing Technology),making such representation without anyknowledgeofitstruthandasapositiveassertionthatsmartmetersaresafe,and made it with the
intention that it should be acted on by complainant.If complainant acts and complies with this
false representation,complainant fears and believes an impending injury will be suffered by
complainant and possibly others in complainant's household as well.
COMPLAINT 5
COUNT 9:Elder Abuse.This amounts to knowingly and willfully doing something that a
reasonable person would not do which inflicts physical and emotional pain and mental injury to an
elderly person.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP,having foreknowledge of
complainant's age (99-years-old)and physical conditions,continues to acknowledge their intent to
abuse complainant by negligent infliction of physical pain and mental injury by continuing their
strong-arm intimidation tactics,threats,duress,and coercion against complainant in their attempt
to install a dangerous and health-hazardous smart meter against complainants will,which makes
this a criminal act as per,TITLE 18-1505,subsection 2 &4 of the Idaho Statutes.
DEFINITIONS
From:Black's Law Dictionary.Fourth Edition
EXTORT.To compel or coerce,as a confession or informationby any means serving to overcome
one's power of resistance,or making the confession or admission involuntary.Sutton v.Commonwealth,207 Ky.597,269 S.W.754,757.To gain by wrongful methods,to obtain In amunlawfulmanner,to compel payments by means of threats of injury to person,property,or
reputation.McKenzie v.State,113 Neb.576,204 N.W.60,61;State v.Richards,97 Wash.587,
167 P.47,48.To take from unlawfully;to exact something wrongfully by threats or putting in fear.State v.Adams,Del.,106 A.287,288,7 Boyce,335.See Extortion.
The natural meaning of the word "extort"is to obtain money or other valuable thing either by
compulsion,by actual force,or by the force of motives applied to the will,and often more
overpowering and irresistible than physical force.Com.v.O'Brien,12 Cush.,Mass.,90.
EXTORTION.Unlawful obtaining of money from another.People v.Parkinson,181 Misc.603,41
N.Y.S.2d 331,334.
Obtaining of property from another,with his consent,induced by wrongful use of force or fear,or
under color of official right.And see State v.Logan,104 La.760,29 So.336;In re Rempfer,51
S.D.393,216 N.W.355,359,55 A.L.R.1346;Lee v.State.16 Ariz.291,145 P.244,246,
Ann.Cas.1917B,131.Obtaining of property of another by threats to injure him and to destroy hisproperty,State v.Phillips,62 Idaho 656,115 P.2d 418,420.Taking or obtaining of anythingfrom
another by means of illegal compulsion or oppressive exaction,Daniels v.U.S.,C.C.A.Cal.,17 F.2d
339,342;whether by an officer or otherwise,United States v.Dunklev,D.C.Cal.,235 F.1000,
1001.
A taking under color of office is of essence of offense.La Tour v.Stone,139 Fla.681,190 So.704,
709,710.
At common law,any oppression by color or pretense of right,and particularlyand technicallythe
exaction or unlawful taking by an officer of money or thing of value,by color of his office,either
when none at all is due,or not so much is due,or when it is not yet due.Preston v.Bacon.4 Conn.
480.See People v.Barondess,16 N.Y.S.436,61 Hun,571;Murrav v.State.125 Tex.Cr.R.252,
67 S.W.2d 274,275;State v.Anderson.66 N.D.522,267 N.W.121,123;Whart.Cr.L.833.
Term in comprehensive or general sense signifies any oppression under color of right,and in strict
or technical sense signifies unlawful taking by any officer,under color of office,of any money orthingofvaluenotduehim,more than is due,or before it is due.State v.Barts.132 N.J.L.74,38
A.2d 838,843,844,848;State v.Vallee,136 Me.432,12 A.2d 421.
To constitute "extortion,"money or other thing of value must have been willfully and corruptly
received.La Tour v.Stone,139 Fla.681,190 So.709,710.
To constitute "extortion,"the wrongful use of fear must be the operating cause producing consent.People v.Biggs.178 Cal.79,172 P.152,153.
COMPLAINT 6
GROSS NEGLIGENCE.The Intentionalfailure to perform a manifest duty in reckless disregard
of the consequences as affecting the life or property of another;such a gross want of care and regard
for the rights of others as to justify the presumption of willfulness and wantonness.Seelig v.First
Nat.Bank,D.C.IlL,20 F.Supp.61,68.
The failure to exercise slight care.Jones v.Atchison.T.&S.F.Ry.Co.,98 Kan.133,157 P.399,
400;Burton Const.Co.v.Metcalfe,162 Ky.366,172 S.W.698,701.
In the law of torts (and especially with reference to personal injury cases),the term means such
negligenceas evidences a reckless disregard of human life,or of the safety of persons exposed to its
dangerous effects,or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious
indifference to the rights of others which is equivalentto an intentional violationof them.McDonald
v.Railroad Co.,Tex.Civ.App.,21 S.W.775;Railroad Co.v.Bodemer,139 Ill.596,29 N.E.692,
32 Am.St.Rep.218;Coit v.Western Union Tel.Co.,130 Cal.657,63 P.83,53 L.R.A.678;Bremer
v.Lake Erie &W.R.Co.,318 Ill.11,148 N.E.862,866,41 A.L.R.1345.
Indifferenceto present legal duty and utter forgetfulness of legal obligations,so far as other persons
may be affected,and a manifestly smaller amount of watchfulness and circumspection than the
circumstances require of a person of ordinary prudence.Burke v.Cook,246 Mass.518,141 N.E.
585,586.Negligence bordering on recklessness.People v.Adams.289 Ill.339,124 N.E.575,577.
Words "gross negligence,"are equivalent to words "reckless and wanton."Jones v.
Commonwealth,213 Ky.356,281 S.W.164,167.
HAZARDOUS NEGLIGENCE.Such careless or reckless conduct as exposes one to very great
danger of injury or to imminentperil.Riggs v.Standard Oil Co.,C.C.Minn.,130 F.204.
ACTIONABLE.
ACTIONABLE FRAUD.Deception practiced in order to induce another to part with property or
surrender some legal right;a false representation made with an intention to deceive;may be
committed by stating what is known to be false or by professing knowledge of the truth of a statement
which is false,but in either case,the essential ingredient is a falsehooduttered with intent to deceive.
Sawyer v.Prickett,19 Wall.146,22 L.Ed.105.
To constitute "actionable fraud,"it must appear that defendant made a material representation;that
it was false;that when he made it he knew it was false,-or made it recklessly without any knowledge
of its truth and as a positive assertion;that he made it with intention that it should be acted on byplaintiff;that plaintiff acted in reliance on it;and that plaintiff thereby suffered injury.Blair v.
McCool,136 Or.139,295 P.950,952.Essential elements are representation,falsity,scienter,
deception,and injury.Cobb v.Cobb,211 N.C.146,189 S.E.479,482.
CONCLUSION
It is my sincere wish that you and your OFFICE of the ATTORNEY GENERAL investigate
this entire matter concerning this wicked and wanton behavior and the strong-arm intimidation
tactics of ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP and why they are permitted to continue to
violate and interfere with my,as well as many other ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP
customer's existing valid contractual agreements against their will and consent,FOURTH and
FIFTH AMENDMENT Rights,and other violations as mentioned above,and also why the IDAHO
PUC/State Legislature permits/sanctions this type of criminal behavior.
COMPLAINT 7
As time is of the essence,I respectfully request that this matter be given priority status and atimelyremedysoughtinordertoavoidtheapparentupcomingelectricalservicedisconnection injustamatterofdays,not just for myself but for many other ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP customers similarly situated.
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration in remedying this matter as soon as
possible in order that justice may be done.
Very truly,
Witness to signatu e #1 1 ess to signature #2
COMPLAINT 8
DECLARATION OF Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
IN THE FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT
I,Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,being of sound mind do make this Declaration of my own free will with-
out any undue outside influence.
I declare the following:
1.On November 22,2022,I did receive an undated and unsigned letter from ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER/PACIFICORP stating that their installer couldn't "access"the meter base at 5447 E
Hacienda Dr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho in order to install a smart meter.This latter also instructed
me to call their 800 number to resolve any access issues and set an appointment to have my meter
updated.
2.On December 1,2022,I sent/served by Registered mail to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP at 1407 West North Temple,Salt
Lake City and the same by Certified mail to P.O.Box 400,Portland,Oregon,a CONDITIONAL
ACCEPTANCE with a cover letter addressing the letter that they sent to me.In this mailing I
also included their original letter with my "Returned for Cause"statement on it.ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP did not
respond to this CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
3.On January 6,2023,I sent/served Certified mail to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY W.
HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP a COURTESY NOTICE to both addresses noted in
number 2 above giving them 3 more days to respond to my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE of
December 1,2022.They did not respond to this COURTESY NOTICE.
4.On January 26,2023,I sent/served Certified mail to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY
W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP a NOTICE OF FAULT to both addresses noted
in number 2 above giving them 5 more days to cure their error and respond to my
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE of December 1,2022.They did not respond to this NOTICE
OF FAULT which put them in DEFAULT.
5.On February 15,2023,I sent/served Certified mail to ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY
W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP a NOTICE OF DEFAULT informingthem of
their DEFAULT and tacit acquiescence to and agreement with my position as enumerated in my
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE of December 1,2022,as well as my cover letter of same date,
along with a NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL to both addresses noted in number 2 above.This NOTICE
OF ESTOPPEL notifies ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,
PRESIDENT PACIFICORP that they are estopped from any and all further action(s),claims,
counterclaims,demands,and or suits against me,concerning the matter of their attempted
installation of a smart meter on my property located at 5447 E Hacienda Dr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho.
6.My NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL of February 15,2023 includes a notice of an implied contract with
specified terms due to their tacit acquiescence agreement and subsequent DEFAULT informing
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT PACIFICORP that
DECLARATION IN THEFORMOF AN AFFIDAVIT
RECEIVED
2023 March, 22 7:58AM
IDAHO PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
violation of said terms of this ESTOPPEL will be construed as an offense against me making
them liable to me for damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00U.S.(One Million Dollars)due
and payableupon demand within 30 days of such demand.This ESSTOPPEL also informs them
that this is an implied contract and self-executing contract enforceable in court and that violating
this ESTOPPEL signifies "performance"on their part constituting their acceptance of the terms
of said ESTOPPEL.
7.On or around March 12,2023,I received an unsigned threatening letter from ROCKY
MOUNTAIN POWER/PACIFICORP stating that their contractor was refused access to perform
a meter exchange at my home at 5447 E HaciendaDr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho and that this was their
second written notice.This letter also instructed me to contact them at their 800 number to
resolve access issues and set an appointment to have my meter updated and then given 15 days
from date of said letter (March 1,2023)to comply or they will refer my account to their service
disconnection process,holding my electrical service hostage and threatening to shut off my
electrical power.
8.Point 7 above verifies ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,
PRESIDENT PACIFICORP's violation of my ESTOPPEL signifying"performance"on their
part,indicating acceptance of the terms of said ESTOPPEL,initiating their liabilityto me for
damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00U.S.(One Million Dollars).
9.At no time,past or present have I or anyone else in my household ever denied "access"to
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER to come onto my private property to read the electric meter.
10.I am a 99-year-old widow living on a fixed income who is legally blind,deaf,and hyper-electro
sensitive.ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER's threats and strong-arm intimidation tactics,has caused
me a great deal of endless,anxiety,fatigue,emotional and mental distress,headaches,insomnia,
and severe stomach upset.I consider ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER's use of abusive threats,
duress,and coercion in an attempt to get me to consent to accepting a smart meter on my home,to
be negligent infliction of physical pain and mental injury as per TITLE 18-1505,subsection 2 &4oftheIdahoStatutes.
I,Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,affirm and certify on my own unlimited commercial liability that I have
read the above affidavit and do know the contents to be the truth,the whole truth,correct and
complete to the best of my knowledg ,willing to testify to this.
Jaco H.van i uris D
Witness to signature ¥l Wi ss to signature #2
DECLARATION IN THEFORMOF AN AFFIDAVIT 2
ROCKY MOUNTAIN 1407WestNorthTemplePOWERSaltLakeCity,Utah 84 I 16
A DIVISION OF PACIFICORP
March 1,2023
Jacoba Van Mastrigt
5447 E Hacienda Dr
idaho Falls,ID 83406 8228
RE:SECOND NOTICE:Required Access for Meter Upgrade at 5447 E Hacienda Dr Idaho Falls,ID
Dear Jacoba Van Mastrigt:
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.If you are not responsible for theelectricserviceatthesitelistedabove,please pass this request to the property manager or
owner as soon as possible.
Our contractor was refused access to perform a meter exchange at the address listed above.This is our second written notice.We have also attempted to reach you by telephone.To avoidterminationofelectricserviceatthisaddress,you must contact us at the number providedbelow.
You are coMractuagobligto allow us safe and unencumbered access to our equipment.Meter access is a condition of electric service,as expressed in the Idaho Public UtilitiesCommission's Customer Relation Rules,namely Electric Service Regulation No.6,a copy ofwhichisenclosedforyourconvenience.Moreover,to the extent that access was denied
because of the type of meter being installed,please be aware that the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission has reviewed smart meter technology,including the prevailing scientific research
on consumer safety,and concluded that smart meters are safe and allowed for all customers inIdaho.If you would like additional informationregarding the electric regulations that governsRockyMountainPower's operations,review them at the Idaho Commission's website atpuc.idaho.gov.
Our new meters bring with them a host of benefits,enabling our customers to securely -
View Daily/Hourly/15-Minuteinterval usage data through your Rocky Mountain Poweraccount
Set billing thresholds and alerts throughour website and mobile application
Automaticallysend notifications whenever your power is interrupted and subsequently
restored
Rocky Mountain Power will also be able to troubleshoot abnormal electric voltage or current
issues on our lines that could impact the qualityof your service.Our meters deliver whole
home usage data through a secure LTE network and do not connect with any additional smart
devices installed at your site or external networks.Your data is safe and no personal
information is ever shared with outside parties.
(Continued on reverse side)
ROCKY MOUNTAINPOWER
Second Revision of Sheet No.6R.1LP.O.C.No.I Canceling Virst Revision of Sheet No.6R.1
Ei,E(IRICSERVICEREGULATION NO.6
NTATE OF IDAllO
Company's Installation
1.COMPANY'N INSI Al I.ATION
I acept as otherwise provided m these Regulations,an I:Icetne Scruce Agreement.or the Electr:eSerneeSchedules,the Company «d!matall and maintam its Imes and equipment on its side of thePomtofDeliverv.but shall not be required to install or nuintain any Imes or equipment exceptmetersandaccesoriesbeyondthatpointOnlytheCompanyisauthorizedtomaketheconnectionsatthePointofDebtery.Licetric sernec turmshed under this tanff will be alternating curTem.60hertz.smyle or three-phasc.Primarv service soltayc will tac at one of the nominal standard voltageavadabicfromtheCompanyatorneartheCustomerskwation.Secondarv senice voltage will beirm11edto:
Smyic-phasc.120 volts.2-wire.proundedSmyle-phase.120 240 volts.3-wire.groundedSmyle-phase.240 4NU volts.3-n Ire.prounded
Ihree-phase,20SY 120 vohs.4-wirc.prounded,«veIbree-phase.450Y 2T'volts.4-wire.prounded,wve
2.COMPAM FACILITIENO.N (TNTONIER'NPREMINEN(a)AI!matenah fumished and mstalled by the Company on the Customer's prem:ses.shall be,and remain,tbc property of the Company.1he customer shall not break the Company'smeterseals.In the et ent of law or damage to the Company's property.ansm;from neglcetcarelessness,or mouse by the Customer.the cost of necessarv repairs or repheement shallbepa:d by the customer.
(b)Customer without expense to the Company shall make or procure conveyance to theCompanyofsatisfactoryRights-of ay Easements across the property owned or controlledbytheCustomerfortheCompany's imes or extensions thereof necessary or meldental to thefurmshmyofservicetotheCustomer.
(c)t he Customer shan p:rmit sate,access to Company's represen:atis cs at all hours to maintaintheComp,my's cicetrie dismbution facilitic.s.The Customer shall also pcmut the Companytoinmtree,and other vcpetanon to the extent necessarv to asoid mterference with theCompany%unes and to protcet pubbe saicty.
(d)the Customer shan provide saic.unencumbered acces to Company s representatises atreas<mable times,for the purpose of readmg meters.inspecting.repamng or removingmetennydevicesandwiringoftheCompany.
Submated t nder Case No.PAC-L-19-12
thNt Lik Septemiwr 1.4.2019 El-FEf ilkE:January A 2020
Page 2
Please contact us at 1-800-895-0631 immediately to resolve access issues and to set an
appointmentto have your meter updated.We are happy to answer any additional questions
you may have regarding the new meter and look forward to working with you.
If we do not hear from you within 15 days from the date of this letter to resolve this issue,we
will refer your account to our service disconnection process.We look forward to hearing from
you and will always consider it a privilege to serve you.
Kind Regards,
Rocky Mountain Power
Para rnós información,llame al 1-888-225-2611 para hablar con un especialista en español.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN o 1407West North TemplePOWERaSaltbeOgUmh8406
A DMSION OF PACIFICORP
Jacoba Van Mastrigt
5447 E Hacienda Dr
Idaho Falls ID 83406 8228 CC
DearJacoba Van Mastrigt:
You can count on us to provide the affordable and consistent power you need.We're usingstate-of-the-arttechnology to deliver dependable power as we plan for the future.
We were recently in your area to upgrade your existing electric meter,but our installer couldn't
access the meter base at 5447 E Hacienda Dr,Idaho Falls,Idaho.As required by the Idaho PublicServiceCommission,clear and safe access must be available to electric meters for inspection,maintenance,meter upgrades,and to enable us to respond to any emergencies.
The Idaho Public Utilities Commission has reviewed smart meter technology,and the prevailingscientificresearchonconsumersafety,and concluded that smart meters are allowed in Idahowithoutanyalternativemeteringoptions.
Please call 1-800-895-0631within 15 days of receiving this letter to resolve any access issues
and set an appointment to have your meter updated.We are happy to answer any questionsyoumayhaveregardingthenewmeterandlookforwardtoworkingwithyou.
Kind Regards,
Rocky Mountain Power
Para más información,llame al 1-888-225-2611para hablar con un especialista en español.
To:Whom it may concern Date:December 1,2022RockyMountainPower
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84116
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
RE:Smart Meter Installation
Dear Sir or Mam,
This is in reply to your undated and unsigned letter I received on November21,2022 instructingmetocallyour800numbertoresolveanyaccessissuesandsetanappointmenttohavemyexistingmeterupdatedwithyour"smart"of "advanced"digital utilitymeter.Please find attached my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE and your original undated andunsignedletterwithmy"Returned for Cause"statement printed thereon.Be advised that I never requested a "smart"or "advanced"digital utilitymeter to beinstalledonmyprivateproperty/home and will not do so in the future.My current meter hasbeenservingmewellalltheseyearssoIseenoneedtohaveitreplaced.For some strange reason Rocky Mountain Power Co.wants to change terms of a long-standing agreement/contract without providing me with "full disclosure"of not onlythe terms oftheproposedchanges,but the truth of everything a customer has a right to know about the prosandconsofthe"smart"or "advanced"digital utility meters and smart grid.Also,be advised that my privateproperty is posted with No Trespassing signs andLawfulNoticeofseverecivilpenaltiestoanywould-be installers and unauthorized intruderswhoenterwithoutmyexpresswrittenpermissiontocomeontomyprivateproperty.Further,I donotauthorizeanyofyourinstallersoryourthird-party contract installers to come upon myprivatepropertyatanytimeforanyreason.
Please note that,YOUR METER READER(S)ONLY HOWEVER,ARE STILLWELCOMETOCOMEONTOMYPRIVATEPROPERTYASBEFORETOREAD THEEXISTINGELECTRICMETERONLY,JUST AS IT HAS BEEN DONE OVER THELAST35ORSOYEARS.Note that I have not previously requested to change any aspect ofourlong-standing relationship.It is your company that is making all the fuss here!It is my desire for you to Cease and Desist in all your unlawful and unnecessary actionagainstmeimmediately,including tryingto sell me a stupid smart meter.You are causing me agreatdealofunnecessarystressandanxietyatmyoldageof99oversomethingwhichwon'tbenefitmeanyway.Please NO NOT TRESPASS!
Very truly,
acoba H.van Mastrigt
To:Whom it may concern Date:December 1,2022RockyMountainPower
P.O.Box 400
Portland,OR 97207
From:JacobaH.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
RE:Smart Meter Installation
Dear Sir or Mam,
This is in reply to your undated and unsigned letter I received on November 21,2022 instructingmetocallyour800numbertoresolveanyaccessissuesandsetanappointmenttohavemyexistingmeterupdatedwithyour"smart"of "advanced"digital utilitymeter.Please find attached my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE and your original undated andunsignedletterwithmy"Returned for Cause"statement printed thereon.Be advised that I never requested a "smart"or "advanced"digital utilitymeter to beinstalledonmyprivateproperty/home and will not do so in the future.My current meter hasbeenservingmewellalltheseyearssoIseenoneedtohaveitreplaced.For some strange reason Rocky Mountain Power Co.wants to change terms of a long-standing agreement/contract without providing me with "full disclosure"of not only the terms oftheproposedchanges,but the truth of everythinga customer has a right to know about the prosandconsofthe"smart"or "advanced"digital utilitymeters and smart grid.Also,be advised that my privatepropertyis posted with No Trespassing signs andLawfulNoticeofseverecivilpenaltiestoanywould-be installers and unauthorized intruderswhoenterwithoutmyexpresswrittenpermissiontocomeontomyprivateproperty.Further,I donotauthorizeanyofyourinstallersoryourthird-party contract installers to come upon myprivatepropertyatanytimeforanyreason.
Please note that,YOUR METER READER(S)ONLY HOWEVER,ARE STILLWELCOMETOCOMEONTOMYPRIVATEPROPERTYASBEFORETOREADTHEEXISTINGELECTRICMETERONLY,JUST AS IT HAS BEEN DONE OVER THELAST35ORSOYEARS.Note that I have not previously requested to change any aspect ofourlong-standing relationship.It is your company that is making all the fuss here!It is my desire for you to Cease and Desist in all your unlawful and unnecessary actionagainstmeimmediately,including trying to sell me a stupid smart meter.You are causing me agreatdealofunnecessarystressandanxietyatmyoldageof99oversomethingwhichwon'tbenefitmeanyway.Please NO NOT TRESPASS!
Very truly,
Jacoba H.van Mastrigt -
To:Whom it may concern Date:December 1,2022
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &
GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT
PACIFICORP
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84116
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
RE:Smart Meter Installation
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
READ CAREFULLY
Notice to Agentis Notice to Principle -Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
BE IT KNOWN,it is not my intention to harass,intimidate,offend,conspire,blackmail,coerce,or cause anxiety,alarm or distress.This document and attachments are presented with honorable and peaceful intentions.
Regarding your undated and unsigned letter received on November 21,2022 instructingme to call your
800 number within 15 days in order to resolve any access issues to my property and set an appointment to
have my meter updated with a "smart"meter,I conditionallyaccept your offer to do so in order to update myelectricpowermetertoasonamed"smart"meter,upon proof of claim and satisfaction of the following
points:
1.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power is not making an offer to modify a contract withoutprovidingfulldisclosureofthetruefactsandterms,and further;
2.Upon proofof claim that in order for Rocky Mountain Power to modify or change the terms of a contract
with one of its customers,that they do not need to provide full disclosure and obtain consent,and further;
3.Upon proofof claim that it is not my position and wish to not have a "smart"or "advanced"digital utility
meter installed on my private property/home at any time,and further;
4.Upon proof of claim that by you attempting to pressure me into accepting your unsafe and harmful
"smart"or "advanced"digital utility meter contrary to my wishes and betterjudgment,is not causing
this 99-year old woman with health concerns,undue stress,worry,and a negativeimpact upon my health,
and further;
5.Upon proof of claim that my deep concerns about the dangers and safety of "smart"or "advanced"digitalutilitymetersarenotvalidconcerns,and that there is not overwhelmingevidence and testimony from
credible sources from around the world confirmingmy concerns about the dangers and safety of such
meters,which is completely contrary to the false,self-serving,and fraudulent information put out by
Rocky Mountain Power Co.that they are safe and non-harmful,and further;
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.Cont'
6.Upon proof of claim that my current electric meter is not serving me well,and that it is not true that a"smart"meter would not benefit me in any way,and that any benefits of such a meter would however,benefit Rocky Mountain Power and their third-partyorganizations at my detriment,and further;
7.Upon proof of claim that the Rocky Mountain Power "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meter andgridisnotadisruptiveandharmful"Trespassing Technology",and further;
8.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.and the Idaho PUC are not involvedin collusion
together against me to defraud me of my Rights by the forms and use of colorable law,and that they
are not in concert of action between them for fraudulent or deceitful purposes against me,and further;
9.Upon proof of claim that the Idaho PUC does not lack lawful authorityor right to encourage and allow
any public utility to use threat,duress,and or coercion to violate any contract(s)between the utility and
customer or to allow a public utility to impose their unreasonable,arbitrary,capricious,and mono-
polistic will upon their customers without their consent knowingthat there are no other options/
utilities for the customers to choose from,and further;
10.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.can force me to purchase a product from them
against my will and consent and hold me hostage for energy,knowing that there are no other providers
or options available to customers,and further;
11.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that the PUC lacks lawful authorityto mandate,order,or imposeanythinguponfreeinhabitantsandtheirprivateproperty,and that if they cannot do so then neither can
a public/private corporation or business impose the same,and further;
12.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.and the Idaho PUC are not holding me hostage in
order to extort a Right(s)from me so that I may continue to receive the energy I need to power and
heat my home,and further;
13.Upon proof of claim that my current power meter has not been paid for by my payments through my
monthly electric power bills for over 35 years,and that I do not actually own my current meter,and
that possession is not nine-tenths of the law,and further;
14.Upon proof of claim that the smart meter does not have sophisticated surveillance and control capabilities
designed to gather informationabout me by monitoring my personal and private habits and routines byRockyMountainPower,and that Rocky MountainPower will not sometime in the near future use this
information against me in some way to control my habits and routines by deciding when and how much
energy I can use,as well as how and when I can use a particular appliance,or that I must pay a fme for
using more power than the power control gods deem necessary,and further;
15.Upon proof of claim that the smart meter does not have sophisticated capability of monitoring,logging,
storing,sharing,and disseminating,my personal and private information about sensitive aspects of my
personal and private life without my knowledge and consent,and further;
16.Upon proof of claim that any government agencies,police departments,and hackers will not have free
and unfettered access to my personal informationand private habits and routines as collected by thesurveillancecapabilityofthesmartmeter,and further;
17.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power would not be unlawfullysearching my house and or
my person,and effects and seizing such information about my personal and private habits and routines
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 2
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont'
via the smart meter without a lawful search warrant or my consent and that this would not be contrary to
my Fourth Amendment Right and the law,and further;
18.Upon proof of claim that your smart meter,once installed,is not a "Trespassing Technology"whichwouldnotonlybeaninvasionofmyprivacy,but a harmful life-disruptingtechnology as well,andfurther;
19.Upon proofof claim that if Rocky Mountain Power installs a smart meter on my private property without
my consent,the original service contract between the utility and the account holder myselfwould not be
deemed to have been breached,and that I would not have lawful remedies for such breach of contract,and further;
20.Upon proof of claim that I would not have substantial lawful remedy for any and all harm or loss causedbyTrespassingTechnology,according to tort law,criminal law,strict liability,negligence,and ultra-
hazardous activity on the part of Rocky Mountain Power regarding the installation of a smart meter onmyprivateproperty,and further;
21.Upon proof of claim that the smart meter(s)that Rocky Mountain Powers installs does not unlawfullyemithigh-energy density pulsed microwave frequencies harmful to biological organisms and or emit
waste electricity in the form of voltage transients (aka "dirty electricity")also harmful to biological
organisms,and further;
22.Upon proof of claim that installed so named "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meters and relatednetworktechnologieshavenotbeendemonstratedtocausefires,cause hacking vulnerability,andfacilitateerroneouslyhighcustomerutilitybills,and further;
23.Upon proof of claim that installed so named "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meters and relatednetworktechnologiescannotanddonotrecordandtransmitdataforthepurposeofsurveillanceof
personal activities in the private dwellings and or workplaces of all utility customers without disclosure,without a lawful warrant,and without consent,and further;
24.Upon proof of claim that a U.S.Congressional Research report entitled "Smart Meter Data:Privacyand
cybersecurity "(February 3,20 12)does not state,"With smart meters,police will have access to datathatmightbeusedtotrackresidents'daily lives and routines while in their homes,including theireating,sleeping,and showeringhabits,what appliances they use and when,and whether theypreferthetelevisiontothetreadmill,among a host of other details.",and all without a lawful search
warrant issued,and further;
25.Upon proof of claim that in 2016,a major "smart"meter data aggregator,Onzo Ltd (UK),did not release
a marketing video stating,"We use this characterized profileto give the utility...the ability tomonetizetheircustomerdatabyprovidingadirectlinktoappropriatethird-party organizations
based on the customer's identified character.",and further;
26.Upon proofof claim that Rocky Mountain Power will not monetize the data they would unlawfullymine
by way of a "smart"meter,from my private activity and that they will not provide a direct link to"appropriate"third-party organizationsbased on my identified character,all without my knowledge,consent,of any lawful search warrant as required by law (The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution),
and further;
27.Upon proof of claim that your Trespassing Technology (smart meter)and related infrastructure would
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 3
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont'
not be mounted on or adjacent to my private property,including but not limited to bodies of livingmen
and women,without first acquiring their explicit consent,and further;
28.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that Rocky Mountain Power will not justlycompensate me,nor
consult with me,nor even inform me that my private property would be utilized as a relay station for thenetworksrelatedtotheTrespassingTechnologyonceasmartmeterisinstalled,and further;
29.Upon proof of claim that your Trespassing Technology does not create a previously non-existentvulnerabilityanddiminishmyprivatedwellingsecuritybyfunctioningasanunsecuredwirelessdigital
gateway into my private property/home,and further;
30.Upon proof of claim that I and any other inhabitants in my home would not become subject to whatever
the desires of Rocky Mountain Power,or government are,or hackers who wishes to remotely interrupt
or control the supply of energy to appliance(s)within my private dwelling or to my entire,dwelling,andfurther;
31.Upon proof of claim that there have not been any fires and deaths associated with the smart meter
Trespassing Technology such as in Vacaville,CA,Dallas,TX,and Reno,NV,and further;
32.Upon proof of claim that due to safety risks,PECO ENERGY CO (Pennsylvania)did not announce in2012,the removal of 96,000 so named "smart meters";and that the PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN
(Canada)did not announce the removal of all of their 105,000 so named "smart meters"in 2014;and thatPORTLANDGENERALELECTRIC(Oregon)did not announce removal of 70,000 so named "smart
meters"in 2014;and that CITY OF LAKELAND (Florida)did not announce removal of more than
10,000 so named "smart meters"in 2014,all for safety reasons,and further;
33.Upon proof of claim that thousands of so named "smart meters"did not simultaneously explode in
Stockton,California in 2015,and further;
34.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology has not caused disruptiveinterferencethathasresultedininjuriestolivingoccupants,includingbut not limited to,men and
women with medical implants,and that the interference has not yet been mitigated in any meaningful
way,and further;
35.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that,according to a vast body of published science,microwaveradiationisproventobeharmfulanddamagingtoallbiologicalorganisms,down to the cellular andmolecularlevel,at relativelylow power densities,and further;
36.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology has not been measured to emit
pulsed radiation between hundreds and tens of thousands of times greater intensity than cell phones,
and as a direct result,there are at least thousands of reports of individuals suffering functionalimpairmentandorillnesssincetheinstallationofTrespassingTechnologywheretheylive,and further;
37.Upon proof of claim that the industry claims that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technologyis "safe"
or "harmless"are not false and misleading;and are not based on training,propaganda techniques,and
the time-averaging of pulsed emissions,rather than the emission values of the pulses,and further;
38.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that several thousand scientific studies have concluded there areharmfulbiologicaleffectsfromexposuretoelectromagneticfrequenciesatpowerdensitieslowerthan
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 4
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont'
is emitted by the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology,and that the claims by power company and
government employees that the Trespassing Technology is harmless,are self-serving and fraudulent,
and further;
39.Upon proof of claim that a significant number of government agencies have not released statements
confirmingthat agencies such as the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC),Health Canada
and the InternationalCommission on Non-IonizingRadiation (ICNIRP)have "safety"guidelines for
microwave radiation exposure which are insufficient for functioningas a guideline,because they are
based solely on thermal effect,and do not take into account any of the body of several thousand
published,peer-reviewed scientific studies showing harmfulnon-thermal effects,and further;
40.Upon proofof claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology does not create measurable voltage
transients,also known as dirty electricity,on existing electrical wiring,at levels that are harmful and
damaging to all biological organisms,and further;
41.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology does not cause systemic
inaccuracies in billing,resulting in electricity customers paying unjustamounts for unused,or wasted
energy,and further;
42.Upon proof of claim that as a result of wasted energy caused by voltage transients due to Trespassing
Technology,that ground voltage has also not been measure in areas where "smart"meter Trespassing
Technology is deployed,and that this is also not harmful and damaging to all biological organisms,andfurther;
43.Upon proof of claim that the gathering of information by Rocky Mountain Power via a smart meter about
my personal and private habits and routines without my knowledge and consent would not be unlawful,
and further;
44.Upon proof of claim that I do not have and hold certain natural/unalienable Rights,as well as
Constitutionallysecured rights,privileges and immunities,and further;
45.Upon proof of claim that I do not have a lawful right to be secure in my person,houses,papers,and
effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,and that these rights shall not be violated,as statedintheFourthAmendmenttotheConstitutionfortheUnitedStatesofAmerica,and further;
46.Upon proof of claim that it is not true,that if tapping someone's telephone or entering their home/private
property without a lawful search warrant is unlawful and a crime,then it would equally be true thattappingmyprivateelectricalsystembywayofa"smart"or "advanced"utility meter for sensitive
personal and private informationwithout a lawful search warrant would also be unlawful and a crime,
and that in law,there is no difference between the two scenarios,and further;
47.Upon proofof claim that the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights does not apply to me,and further;
48.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that,I would no longer be "secure",which is my Fourth Amend-
ment right,in my person,houses,and effects,once a smart meter is installed on my home,and further;
49.Upon proof of claim that Article V of the Bill of Rights does not say that I cannot "be deprived of life,liberty (rightto privacy and freedom from coercion),or property (informationon my personal and private
habits and routines),without due process of law,and further;
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 5
CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE,Cont'
50.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power would not be denyingme my right to due process oflawbygathering/takingpersonal and private information about my personal and privatehabits androutinesviathesmartmeter,and then using,sharing,and disseminating said information all without alawfulsearchwarrant,and without my knowledgeand consent,and further;
51.Upon proofof claim that it is not true that,I did not request a "smart"meter nor did I start thiscontroversy,when in fact it was Rocky Mountain Power Co.that did so.
Your timelyresponse (21 days)from your receipt of this Conditional Acceptance,must be in affidavit form,under your full commercial liability,rebutting each of the points of the undersigned,on a point-by-pointbasis,that the facts contained therein,are true,correct,complete and not misleading.Declarations areinsufficient,as declarations permit lying by omission,which no honorable draft may contain.Any otherresponsebeyondthedateofthisCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEisunacceptableandinvalid.You mustprovidemewithalegitimateandlawfulanswer.Silence to this document is contempt and dishonorable.
With explicit reservation of all of my God-givenunalienable Rights,my Constitutionally secured Rights,privileges,and immunities,none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,In Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,Sui Juris /Date
Witness to Signattire 'Date
Witness to Signature Date
CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE 6
To:Whom it may concern Date:December 1,2022
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER &
GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT
PACIFICORP
P.O.Box 400
Portland,Oregon 97207
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.HaciendaDr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
RE:Smart Meter Installation
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
READ CAREFULLY
Notice to Agentis Notice to Principle -Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
BE IT KNOWN,it is not my intention to harass,intimidate,offend,conspire,blackmail,coerce,or cause anxiety,
alarm or distress.This document and attachments are presented with honorable and peaceful intentions.
Regarding your undated and unsigned letter received on November 21,2022 instructingme to call your
800 number within 15 days in order to resolve any access issues to my property and set an appointment to
have my meter updated with a "smart"meter,I conditionallyaccept your offer to do so in order to update myelectricpowermetertoasonamed"smart"meter,upon proof of claim and satisfaction of the following
points:
1.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power is not making an offer to modify a contract without
providingfull disclosure of the true facts and terms,and further;
2.Upon proof of claim that in order for Rocky Mountain Power to modify or change the terms of a contract
with one of its customers,that they do not need to provide full disclosure and obtain consent,and further;
3.Upon proofof claim that it is not my position and wish to not have a "smart"or "advanced"digital utility
meter installed on my private property/home at any time,and further;
4.Upon proof of claim that by you attempting to pressure me into accepting your unsafe and harmful
"smart"or "advanced"digital utility meter contrary to my wishes and betterjudgment,is not causing
this 99-year old woman with health concerns,undue stress,worry,and a negativeimpact upon my health,
and further;
5.Upon proofof claim that my deep concerns about the dangers and safety of"smart"or "advanced"digitalutilitymetersarenotvalidconcerns,and that there is not overwhelmingevidence and testimony from
credible sources from around the world confirmingmy concerns about the dangers and safety of such
meters,which is completely contrary to the false,self-serving,and fraudulent information put out by
Rocky Mountain Power Co.that they are safe and non-harmful,and further;
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.Cont'
6.Upon proof of claim that my current electric meter is not serving me well,and that it is not true that a"smart"meter would not benefit me in any way,and that any benefits of such a meter would however,
benefit Rocky Mountain Power and their third-partyorganizations at my detriment,and further;
7.Upon proof of claim that the Rocky Mountain Power "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meter andgridisnotadisruptiveandharmful"Trespassing Technology",and further;
8.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.and the Idaho PUC are not involved in collusion
together against me to defraud me of my Rights by the forms and use of colorable law,and that they
are not in concert of action between them for fraudulent or deceitful purposes against me,and further;
9.Upon proof of claim that the Idaho PUC does not lack lawful authorityor right to encourage and allow
any public utility to use threat,duress,and or coercion to violate any contract(s)between the utility and
customer or to allow a public utility to impose their unreasonable,arbitrary,capricious,and mono-
polistic will upon their customers without their consent knowing that there are no other options/
utilities for the customers to choose from,and further;
10.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.can force me to purchase a product from them
against my will and consent and hold me hostage for energy,knowing that there are no other providers
or options available to customers,and further;
11.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that the PUC lacks lawful authority to mandate,order,or imposeanythinguponfreeinhabitantsandtheirprivateproperty,and that if they cannot do so then neither can
a public/private corporation or business impose the same,and further;
12.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power Co.and the Idaho PUC are not holding me hostage in
order to extort a Right(s)from me so that I may continue to receive the energy I need to power and
heat my home,and further;
13.Upon proof of claim that my current power meter has not been paid for by my payments through my
monthlyelectric power bills for over 35 years,and that I do not actually own my current meter,and
that possession is not nine-tenths of the law,and further;
14.Upon proofof claim that the smart meter does not have sophisticated surveillance and control capabilities
designed to gather information about me by monitoring my personal and private habits and routines by
Rocky Mountain Power,and that Rocky Mountain Power will not sometime in the near future use this
information against me in some way to control my habits and routines by deciding when and how much
energy I can use,as well as how and when I can use a particular appliance,or that I must pay a fme for
using more power than the power control gods deem necessary,and further;
15.Upon proof of claim that the smart meter does not have sophisticated capability of monitoring,logging,
storing,sharing,and disseminating,my personal and private information about sensitive aspects of my
personal and private life without my knowledge and consent,and further;
16.Upon proof of claim that any government agencies,police departments,and hackers will not have free
and unfettered access to my personal information and private habits and routines as collected by the
surveillance capability of the smart meter,and further;
17.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power would not be unlawfullysearching my house and or
my person,and effects and seizing such information about my personal and private habits and routines
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 2
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont'
via the smart meter without a lawful search warrant or my consent and that this would not be contrary to
my Fourth Amendment Right and the law,and further;
18.Upon proof of claim that your smart meter,once installed,is not a "Trespassing Technology"which
would not only be an invasion of my privacy,but a harmful life-disruptingtechnology as well,andfurther;
19.Upon proof of claim that if Rocky Mountain Power installs a smart meter on my private property without
my consent,the original service contract between the utility and the account holder myselfwould not be
deemed to have been breached,and that I would not have lawful remedies for such breach of contract,
and further;
20.Upon proof of claim that I would not have substantial lawful remedy for any and all harm or loss caused
by Trespassing Technology,according to tort law,criminal law,strict liability,negligence,and ultra-
hazardous activity on the part of Rocky Mountain Power regarding the installation of a smart meter on
my private property,and further;
21.Upon proof of claim that the smart meter(s)that Rocky Mountain Powers installs does not unlawfully
emit high-energy density pulsed microwave frequencies harmful to biological organisms and or emit
waste electricity in the form of voltage transients (aka "dirty electricity")also harmfulto biological
organisms,and further;
22.Upon proof of claim that installed so named "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meters and relatednetworktechnologieshavenotbeendemonstratedtocausefires,cause hacking vulnerability,and
facilitate erroneously high customer utility bills,and further;
23.Upon proof of claim that installed so named "smart"or "advanced"digital utility meters and related
network technologies cannot and do not record and transmit data for the purpose of surveillance of
personal activities in the private dwellings and or workplaces of all utility customers without disclosure,
without a lawful warrant,and without consent,and further;
24.Upon proof of claim that a U.S.Congressional Research report entitled "Smart Meter Data:Privacyand
cybersecurity"(February 3,2012)does not state,"With smart meters,police will have access to data
that might be used to track residents'daily lives and routines while in their homes,includingtheir
eating,sleeping,and showering habits,what appliances they use and when,and whether they
prefer the television to the treadmill,among a host of other details.",and all without a lawful search
warrant issued,and further;
25.Upon proof of claim that in 2016,a major "smart"meter data aggregator,Onzo Ltd (UK),did not release
a marketing video stating,"We use this characterized profileto give the utility...the ability to
monetize their customer data by providinga direct link to appropriatethird-party organizations
based on the customer's identified character.",and further;
26.Upon proofof claim that Rocky Mountain Power will not monetize the data they would unlawfullymine
by way of a "smart"meter,from my private activity and that they will not provide a direct link to
"appropriate"third-partyorganizations based on my identified character,all without my knowledge,
consent,of any lawful search warrant as required by law (The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution),
and further;
27.Upon proof of claim that your Trespassing Technology (smart meter)and related infrastructure would
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 3
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont
not be mounted on or adjacent to my private property,including but not limited to bodies of livingmen
and women,withoutfirst acquiring their explicit consent,and further;
28.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that Rocky Mountain Power will not justlycompensate me,nor
consult with me,nor even inform me that my private property would be utilized as a relay station for the
networks related to the Trespassing Technology once a smart meter is installed,and further;
29.Upon proof of claim that your Trespassing Technology does not create a previously non-existentvulnerabilityanddiminishmyprivatedwellingsecuritybyfunctioningasanunsecuredwirelessdigital
gateway into my private property/home,and further;
30.Upon proof of claim that I and any other inhabitants in my home would not become subject to whatever
the desires of Rocky Mountain Power,or government are,or hackers who wishes to remotely interrupt
or control the supply of energy to appliance(s)within my private dwelling or to my entire,dwelling,andfurther;
3 1 Upon proof of claim that there have not been any fires and deaths associated with the smart meter
Trespassing Technology such as in Vacaville,CA,Dallas,TX,and Reno,NV,and further;
32.Upon proof of claim that due to safety risks,PECO ENERGY CO (Pennsylvania)did not announce in
2012,the removal of 96,000 so named "smart meters";and that the PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN
(Canada)did not announce the removal of all of their 105,000 so named "smart meters"in 2014;and thatPORTLANDGENERALELECTRIC(Oregon)did not announce removal of 70,000 so named "smart
meters"in 2014;and that CITY OF LAKELAND (Florida)did not announce removal of more than
10,000 so named "smart meters"in 2014,all for safety reasons,and further;
33.Upon proof of claim that thousands of so named "smart meters"did not simultaneously explode in
Stockton,California in 2015,and further;
34.Upon proofof claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology has not caused disruptive
interference that has resulted in injuries to living occupants,includingbut not limited to,men and
women with medical implants,and that the interference has not yet been mitigated in any meaningful
way,and further;
35.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that,according to a vast body of published science,microwave
radiation is proven to be harmful and damaging to all biological organisms,down to the cellular and
molecular level,at relativelylow power densities,and further;
36.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology has not been measured to emit
pulsed radiation between hundreds and tens of thousands of times greater intensity than cell phones,
and as a direct result,there are at least thousands of reports of individuals suffering functional
impairment and or illness since the installation of Trespassing Technology where they live,and further;
37.Upon proofof claim that the industryclaims that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technologyis "safe"
or "harmless"are not false and misleading;and are not based on training,propaganda techniques,and
the time-averaging of pulsed emissions,rather than the emission values of the pulses,and further;
38.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that several thousand scientific studies have concluded there are
harmful biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic frequencies at power densities lower than
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 4
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE,Cont'
is emitted by the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology,and that the claims by power company andgovernmentemployeesthattheTrespassingTechnologyisharmless,are self-serving and fraudulent,
and further;
39.Upon proof of claim that a significant number of government agencies have not released statementsconfirmingthatagenciessuchastheUSFederalCommunicationsCommission(FCC),Health Canada
and the International Commission on Non-IonizingRadiation (ICNIRP)have "safety"guidelines formicrowaveradiationexposurewhichareinsufficientforfunctioningasaguideline,because they are
based solely on thermal effect,and do not take into account any of the body of several thousand
published,peer-reviewed scientific studies showing harmful non-thermal effects,and further;
40.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology does not create measurable voltage
transients,also known as dirty electricity,on existing electrical wiring,at levels that are harmful and
damaging to all biological organisms,and further;
41.Upon proof of claim that the "smart"meter Trespassing Technology does not cause systemic
inaccuracies in billing,resulting in electricity customers paying unjustamounts for unused,or wasted
energy,and further;
42.Upon proof of claim that as a result of wasted energy caused by voltage transients due to TrespassingTechnology,that ground voltage has also not been measure in areas where "smart"meter TrespassingTechnologyisdeployed,and that this is also not harmful and damagingto all biological organisms,andfurther;
43.Upon proofof claim that the gathering of information by Rocky Mountain Power via a smart meter about
my personal and private habits and routines without my knowledge and consent would not be unlawful,and further;
44.Upon proof of claim that I do not have and hold certain natural/unalienable Rights,as well asConstitutionallysecuredrights,privileges and immunities,and further;
45.Upon proof of claim that I do not have a lawful right to be secure in my person,houses,papers,and
effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures,and that these rights shall not be violated,as statedintheFourthAmendmenttotheConstitutionfortheUnitedStatesofAmericaandfurther;
46.Upon proof of claim that it is not true,that if tapping someone's telephone or entering their home/private
property without a lawful search warrant is unlawful and a crime,then it would equally be true thattappingmyprivateelectricalsystembywayofa"smart"or "advanced"utility meter for sensitive
personal and private information without a lawful search warrant would also be unlawful and a crime,and that in law,there is no difference between the two scenarios,and further;
47.Upon proof of claim that the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights does not apply to me,and further;
48.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that,I would no longer be "secure",which is my Fourth Amend-
ment right,in my person,houses,and effects,once a smart meter is installed on my home,and further;
49.Upon proof of claim that Article V of the Bill of Rights does not say that I cannot "be deprived of life,liberty (right to privacy and freedom from coercion),or property (informationon my personal and private
habits and routines),without due process of law,and further;
CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 5
CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE,Cont'
50.Upon proof of claim that Rocky Mountain Power would not be denyingme my right to due process oflawbygathering/takingpersonal and private information about my personal and private habits androutinesviathesmartmeter,and then using,sharing,and disseminating said information all without alawfulsearchwarrant,and without my knowledge and consent,and further;
51.Upon proof of claim that it is not true that,I did not request a "smart"meter nor did I start thiscontroversy,when in fact it was Rocky Mountain Power Co.that did so.
Your timely response (21 days)from your receipt of this Conditional Acceptance,must be in affidavit form,under your full commercial liability,rebutting each of the points of the undersigned,on a point-by-point
basis,that the facts contained therein,are true,correct,complete and not misleading.Declarations areinsufficient,as declarations permit lying by omission,which no honorable draft may contain.Any otherresponsebeyondthedateofthisCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEisunacceptableandinvalid.You mustprovidemewithalegitimateandlawfulanswer.Silence to this document is contempt and dishonorable.
With explicit reservation of all of my God-givenunalienable Rights,my Constitutionally secured Rights,privileges,and immunities,none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,In Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
JacobaH.van Mastrigt,Sui Juris /Bate
Witness to Signature Date
CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE 6
COURTESY NOTICE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle-Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concern Date:1/03/23ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENTPACIFICORP
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84116
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that on the I"day of December,2022,I sent you a CONDITIONALACCEPTANCEdatedDecember1,2022,giving you 21 days to respond.Thus far I have not received your response andconsequentlyafaulthasoccurred.
Perhapsthis is an oversight on your part or perhaps the Holidays interfered with you being able to give atimelyresponse.
Therefore,please accept my offer of an additional three (3)days,from the date of your receipt of thisCOURTESYNOTICE,to respond to my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE (copy attached)of December1,2022.Again,your response to me must be in "affidavit"form,under your full commercial liability,thatthefactscontainedtherein,are true,correct,complete and not misleading.Declarations are insufficient,asdeclarationspermitlyingbyomission,which no honorable draft may contain.
I look forward to your timely response.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally secured Rights,Privileges andImmunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Spegi ,with Assistance,
Jac a H.van Mastrigt,In Sui Juris
Witness Signature #1 Witn ss Signature #2
COURTESY NOTICE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle-Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concem Date:1/03/23ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENTPACIFICORP
P.O.Box 400
Portland,Oregon 97207
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt5447E.Hacienda Dr.Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that on the 1st day of December,2022,I sent you a CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE datedDecember1,2022,giving you 21 days to respond.Thus far I have not received your response andconsequentlyafaulthasoccurred.
Perhaps this is an oversight on your part or perhaps the Holidaysinterfered with you being able to give atimelyresponse.
Therefore,please accept my offer of an additionalthree (3)days,from the date of your receipt of thisCOURTESYNOTICE,to respond to my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE (copy attached)of December1,2022.Again,your response to me must be in "affidavit"form,under your full commercial liability,thatthefactscontainedtherein,are true,correct,complete and not misleading.Declarations are insufficient,asdeclarationspermitlyingbyomission,which no honorable draft may contain.
I look forward to your timely response.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally secured Rights,Privileges andImmunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
tness Signature #1 Witness re #2
NOTICE OF FAULT
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle--Notice to Principleis Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concern Date:1/25/23ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENTPACIFICORP
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84116
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that a fault has occurred due to your silence and fàilure to answer my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCEofDecember1,2022,and my COURTESY NOTICEdated January3,2023,knowing that you have a legal andmoralobligationtospeak,as required by law,where an inquiry or offer left unansweredwould be intentionallymisleading,which can only be equated with fraud and contempt."Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is alegalandmoraldutytospeakorwhenaninquiryleftunansweredwouldbeintentionallymisleading."U.S.v PRUDDEN 424F.2d 1021;U.S.v TWEEL 550 F.2d 297,299,300 (1977)
Further,your choosingto stand mute indicates probable bad faith on your part (see "Definition").Expecting me tosooperateandthentämainingsilentandunwÏÏlingtoreplyinreturniscontempt,which is dishonomble.You seem tobeoperatingunderadoublestandardofarroganceandcontempt,which is unacceptable.
DEFINITION:FAULT-In American Law -Negligence;an error or defect ofjudgment or ofconduct;any deviation from prudence,duty,or rectitude;any shortcoming,or neglect ofcare or perfonnance resulting ÿom inattention,incapacity,or perversity;a wrongtendency,course,or act;bad faith or mismanagement;neglect ofduty.In Civil Law,"Negligence;want ofcare.An improper act oromission,injurious to another,and transpiring through negligence,rashness,or ignorance."Black's Law Dictionarv,Fourth EditionNonetheless,I give you the opportunity to cure your errors,and offer you 5 more days from date of receipt of thisNOTICEtorespondtosaidCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEofDecember1,2022.Again,your response is required.Failure to respond to this offer and my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCE of December 1,2022 will constitute adefaultonyourpartsignifyingyourtacitabandonmentofyourattempttoinstallasmartmeteronmyprivateproperty,and agreementto vacate this matter,forever barring you from any further action or attempts to install asmartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocateda5447EHaciendaDr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally protected Rights,Privileges and Immunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
coba H.van Maihi ŠuÍ Júri
itness to s re #1 Witne .to s'ignature #2
||
NOTICE OF FAULT
Notice to Agentis Notice to Principle -Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concern Date:1/25/23ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENTPACIFICORP
P.O.Box 400
Portland,Oregon 97207
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that a fault has occurred due to your silence and failure to answer my CONDITIONALACCEPTANCEofDecember1,2022,and my COURTESY NOTICE dated January3,2023,knowing that you have a legal andmoralobligationtospeak,as required by law,where an inquiryor offer left unansweredwould be intentionallymisleading,which can only be equated with fraud and contempt."Silence can only be equated withÿaud when there is alegalandmoraldutytospeakorwhenaninquiryleftunansweredwouldbeintentionallymisleading."U.S.v PRUDDEN 424F.2d 1021;U.S.v TWEEL 550 F.2d 297,299,300 (1977)
Further,your choosing to stand mute indicates probable bad fàith on your part (see "Definition").Expecting me tocooperateandthenremainingsilentandunwillingtoreplyinreturniscontempt,which is dishonomble.You seem tobeoperatingunderadoublestandardofarroganceandcontempt,which is unacceptable.
DEFINITION:FAULT-In American Law -Negligence;an error or defect ofjudgment or ofconduct;any deviation.ßom prudence,duty,or rectitude;any shortcoming,or neglect ofcare or perfonnance resulting from inattention,incapacity,or perversity;awrongtendency,course,or act;badfaith or mismanagement;neglect ofduty.In Civil Law,"Negligence;want ofcare.An improper act oromission,injurious to another,and transpiring through negligence,rashness,or ignorance."Black's Law Dictionary,Fourth EditionNonetheless,I give you the opportunity to cure your errors,and offer you 5 more days from date of receipt of thisNOTICEtorespondtosaidCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEofDecember1,2022.Again,your response is required.Failure to respond to this offer and my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE of December 1,2022 will constitute adefaultonyourpartsignifyingyourtacitabandonmentofyourattempttoinstallasmartmeteronmyprivateproperty,and agreementto vacate this matter,forever barring you from any further action or attempts to install asmartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocateda5447EHaciendaDr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally protected Rights,Privileges and Immunities(Article 4:2:I)with none waived,and without prejudice.
ery Tr ly,in per Perso pe ial,Assi ance,
Ja o a H.van Mastrigt,Sui Juris
Wi s to signa e 1 "Witn s o signature #2
NOTICE OF DEFAULT '
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle --Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concern Date:February 15,2023ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT
PACIFICORP
1407 West North Temple
Salt Lake City,UT 84116
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that due to your failure to respondto my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated 12/01/22;myCOURTESYNOTICEdated1/03/23;and my NOTICE OF FAULT dated 1/25/23,you have shownto the worldyourindifferenceandcontemptforme,which is not only dishonorable but a disgrace as well.
Therefore,this NOTICE serves to inform you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER;GARY W.HOOGEVEEN.PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP that you are now in DEFAULT due to your repeated silence to my chain of documents
and failure to perform a duty where you have a legal and moral obligation to speak,and this NOTICE serves asprimafacieevidenceofyoursilence,contempt.and dishonor in this matter.
"A default is an omission ofthat which ought to be done,and more specifically,the omission or failure to performa legal dutv.
The term also embraces the idea of dishonesty,or an act or omission discreditable to one's profession."Black's Law Dictionary.Fourth Edition
"Silence can only be equated with fi-aud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would
be intentiona/ly misleading."U.S.v PRUDDEN 424 F.2d 1021;U.S.v TWEEL 550 F.2d 297,299,300 (1977)
Further,your silence to all my documents and correspondence,is your tacit agreement and acquiescence to my position as
enumerated in my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCEand letter of 12/01/22,and all subsequent documentation which youreceivedfromme,as well as your tacit acknowledgement and agreement that you have vacated this matter and that you have nofurtherintentiontoandwillnotinstallasmartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocatedat5447E.Hacienda Dr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally protected Rights,Privileges and Immunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,In Sui Juris
Witness to signature #1 WÍtness to signature #2
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
Notice to Agentis Notice to Principle -Notice to Principle is Notice Agent
To:To whom it may Concern Date:February 15,2023ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWER&GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT
PACIFICORP
P.O.Box 400
Portland,Oægon 97207
From:Jacoba H.van Mastrigt'
5447 E.Hacienda Dr.
Idaho Falls,Idaho
Dear Sir or Mam,
Be it known,that due to your fàilure to respondto my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE dated 12/01/22;myCOURTESYNOTICEdated1/03/23;and my NOTICE OF FAULT dated 1/25/23,you have shown to the worldyourindifferenceandcontemptforme,which is not only dishonorable but a disgrace as well.
Therefore,this NOTICE serves to inform you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER;GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP that you are now in DEFAULT due to your repeated silence to my chain of documents
and failure to perform a duty where you have a legal and moral obligation to speak,and this NOTICE serves asprimafacieevidenceofyoursilence,contempt,and dishonor in this matter.
"A default is an omission ofthat which ought to be done,and more specgically,the omission or failure to performa legal duty.The term also embraces the idea ofdishonestv,or an act or omission discreditable to one's profession."Black's Law Dictionary,Fourth Edition
"Silence can only be equated withfi aud when there is a legal and moral duty to speak or when an inquiryleft unanswered would
be intentionallymisleading."U.S.v PRUDDEN 424 F.2d 1021;U.S.v TWEEL 550 F.2d 297,299,300 (1977)
Further,your silence to all my documents and correspondence,is your tacit agreement and acquiescence to my position as
enumerated in my CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCEand letter of 12/01/22,and all subsequent documentation which youreceivedfromme,as well as your tacit acknowledgement and agreement that you have vacated this matter and that you have nofurtherintentiontoandwillnotinstallasmartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocatedat5447E.Hacienda Dr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho.
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally protected Rights,Privileges and Immunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,I ui Juris
Witness to signature #1 Witness to signature #2
NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL 5 fr
BY ACQUIESCENCE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE --NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT
BE IT KNOWN,this 15"'day of February,2023,that you,ROCKYMOUNTAIN POWER and GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP,by your "SILENCE"have tacitly acquiesced in the matterconcerningmyCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEdatedDecember1,2022,in which you were givenreasonableopportunitytorespondtimelyto,and by your "SILENCE"to my COURTESYNOTICE,datedJanuary3,2023,and your silence on my NOTICE OF FAULT dated January 25,2023.You therefore,werefoundinDEFAULT,signifyingthat a fraud has been perpetrated upon Me,pursuant to U.S.v.Tweel,550F.2d 297,299 (1977),thereby initiating the DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE,pursuant to Carmine v.Bowen,64 A.932 (1906),which is now in full force and effect upon you,ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWERandGARYW.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP.
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN,that you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER and GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP are hereby estopped from any and all furtheraction(s),claims,counterclaims,demands,and or suits against me,concerning your matter involvingyour attempted installation of a smartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocatedat5447EHaciendaDr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho and myself.
NOW BE ADVISED,that you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER and GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP hereby agree and accept that any violation(s)of this ESTOPPLE will beconstrued,at the very least,a "tortious"offense against me making you liable for damages to me in theamountof$1,000,000.00 U.S.(One Million Dollars)due and payable upon demand within 30 days of suchdemand.Understandthat this is an implied and self-executing contract enforceable in court and that violatingthisESTOPPELandmovingagainstmeandormyprivatepropertyhereafteris"performance"on your part,and constitutes your acceptance of the terms of this ESTOPPEL.
If you do not wish to become subject to this implied contract,then DO NOT TRESPASS upon me or myprivatepropertyanyfurtherbyVIOLATINGthisESTOPPEL.
THIS IS AN IMPLIED CONTRACT -PERFORMANCE IS ACCEPTANCE
With explicit reservation of all my unalienable and Constitutionally secured and protected Rights,PrivilegesandImmunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
Jacoba H.van Mastrigt,Sui Juris /Date'
Witness to signature #1 Witness to signaturb #2
NOTICE OF ESTOPPEL
BY ACQUIESCENCE
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE -NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT
BE IT KNOWN,this 15*day of February,2023,that you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER and GARY WHOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP,by your "SILENCE"have tacitly acquiesced in the matterconcerningmyCONDITIONALACCEPTANCEdatedDecember1,2022,in which you were givenreasonableopportunitytorespondtimelyto,and by your "SILENCE"to my COURTESY NOTICE,datedJanuary3,2023,and your silence on my NOTICE OF FAULT dated January 25,2023.You therefore,werefoundinDEFAULT,signifying that a fraud has been perpetrated upon Me,pursuant to U.S.v.Tweel,550F.2d 297,299 (1977),thereby initiating the DOCTRINE OF ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE,pursuant to Carmine v.Bowen,64 A.932 (1906),which is now in full force and effect upon you,ROCKYMOUNTAINPOWERandGARYW.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP.
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN,that you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER and GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP are hereby estopped from any and all further action(s),claims,counterclaims,demands,and or suits against me,concerning your matter involvingyour attempted installation of a smartmeteronmyprivatepropertylocatedat5447EHaciendaDr.,Idaho Falls,Idaho and myself
NOW BE ADVISED,that you,ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER and GARY W.HOOGEVEEN,PRESIDENT,PACIFICORP hereby agree and accept that any violation(s)of this ESTOPPLE will beconstrued,at the very least,a "tortious"offense against me making you liable for damages to me in theamountof$1,000,000.00 U.S.(One Million Dollars)due and payable upon demand within 30 days of suchdemand.Understandthat this is an implied and self-executing contract enforceable in court and that violatingthisESTOPPELandmovingagainstmeandormyprivatepropertyhereafteris"performance"on your part,and constitutes your acceptance of the terms of this ESTOPPEL.
If you do not wish to become subject to this implied contract,then DO NOT TRESPASS upon me or myprivatepropertyanyfurtherbyVIOLATINGthisESTOPPEL.
THIS IS AN IMPLIED CONTRACT -PERFORMANCE IS ACCEPTANCE
With explicitreservation of all my unalienableand Constitutionallysecured and protected Rights,PrivilegesandImmunities(Article 4:2:1)with none waived,and without prejudice.
Very Truly,in Proper Person,Special,with Assistance,
JacobaH.van Mastrigt,Sui Jurfs Ifate
Witness to signature #1 Witness to signatu e #2