HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130812Comments.pdfa|,'1 " I tt!1 r ^it:t . t "t ,i {,. I:a!i I : ! i:rl {,.}ul
,.-!r r I r.r; j i -r i I
RENEI{T.&,BLS trHUfl SY COiIUTIOR
August 8,?AL3
Idaho Public Service Commission
P.O. Box 83724
Boise,lD 83720-A474
Re: Comments on PacifiCorp 201.3 Integrated Resource Plan
Docket No. PAC-E-13-05
Dear Commission President Kjellander and Commissioners:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on PacifiCorp's 2013
Integrated Resource Plan [RP]. The Renewable Enerry Coalition (Coalition) is
providing these comments for your review. The Coalition is a large group of
primarily existing hydroelectric Public Utility Regulatory PoliciesAct (PURPA)
qualiffing facilities (QF) located in PacifiCorp's multi-state service areas. We have
one primary issue which is the year of resource deficiency in the IRP.
PacifiCorp's20L3lRP acknowledges the utiliQ/s need for capacity resources
immediately, in 2013. However, the utility plans to use short-term power purchases
in the wholesale market to meet those needs rather tlan building a new generating
facility. Frequently in the past, a deficit year was anticipated years in advance and a
new generating facility planned to come on line on or near the year of deficit
However, the availability of sufficient wholesale power allows PacifiCorp to delay
the decision to build a new generating facility. PacifiCorp, in describing its resource
situation with regulatory commissions, often refdrs to the next avoidable resource
as a 2024 CCCT. This is questionablg because the nefi avoidable resource is power
purchases in 201"3 and demand reductions through demand control programs
[DSM). We believe that their decision of how or when to fill a deficit, whether from
purchased power, DSM or a new generating facility, does not negate the reality of a
specific capacity deficitin Z0L3,which grows significantly each year of the planning
horizon (see PacifiCorp 2AL3IRP Volume 1, page 99, Table 5.1,2).
The Coalition has several members with operating hydro elecric projects in ldaho
that have existing and long-standing PURPA contracts with PacifiCorp, and have
been receiving both capacity and energy payments. Contracts expiring and needing
replacement could be impacted by avoided cost pricing trased upon theyear of
deficit being established as 2A24.
The Coalition appreciates the Commission's consideration of these comments. We
Iook forward to working with the Commission and PacifiCorp in esablishing fair
and reasonable contract terms for REC members in ldaho.
Sincerelv.
lohn R Lowe
Renewable Enerry Coalition
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 8th day of August, 2013, I caused to be served a true
and correct copy of the foregoing document to each of the following via the method so indicated:
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary (original and 5)
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
P.O. Box 83720
Boise,lD 83720-0074
jj ewel@puc. state.id.us
Ted Weston
Daniel E. Solander
Mark C. Moench
Rocky Mountain Power
201 South Main, Suite 2300
Salt Lake City, UT 841l1
ted.weston@pacifi corp.com
daniel. so lan der @p acifrc o rp. com
mark. moen ch@p aciftco rp. c om
Yvonne Hogle
Regulatory Counsel
Rocky Mountain Power
201 S. Main, One Utah Center,23'd Floor
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
yvonne. ho g le @p acilrcorp. com
Benjamin J. Otto
Idaho Conservation League
710 N. 6th Street
Boise,ID 83702
botto@idahoconservation. org
Ken Miller
Clean Energy Program Director
Snake River Alliance
Box 173
Boise,ID 83701
kmiller@snakeriveralliance. org
U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail
Electronic Mail
Electronic Mail
Electronic Mail
Electronic Mail
Renewable Energy Coalition