Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20101216Application for Intervenor Funding.pdfBenjamin J. Otto (ISB No. 8292) Idao Conservation League 710 N. 6th St Boise, ID 83702 Ph: (208) 345-6933 x 12. Fax: (208) 344-0344 bottoCPidahoconservation.org t"', iq\û UEC \6 lt\ 3: 22 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MA TIER OF THE ) APPLICATION OF PACIFICORP DBA ) ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR ) APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO ITS ) ELECTRIC RATE SCHEDULES ) CASE NO. PAC-E-I0-07 APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING COMES NOW, the Idao Conservation League reICL") pursuat to Idaho Code § 61- 617A and IDAPA 31.01.01.161-165 with the followig application forIntervenor fundig. On July 9,2010, the Commission granted ICL intervenor status in this matter in Order 32030. i. Idao Code § 61-617A andIDAPA Rule 31.01.01.161 Requirement Rocky Mountain Power (((RMP") is a reguated, electric public utilty with gross Idaho intrastate, annua revenues exceedig three milion, five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000.00). II. IDAPA Rule 31.01.01.162 Requirements 1. Itemized lit of Expenses The attached Exhibit A is an itemized list of expenses incurd by iet in thi proceedig. 2. Statement of Proposed Findigs The proposed findigs and recommendations of ICL ar set forlimtJídict tesinony of its expert witness, Dr. Don Readig. In summar, ICL proposd thre fmdigs for the Commission. First, ICL proposed a unique residential rate design for both schedule 1 and Schedule ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 1 December 16,2010 36 customers. Second, ICL proposed that the Commission order RMP to brig the issue of movig the irrgation load control progr before the Multi-State Protocol standing committee. Third, ICL proposed that the Commission order RMP to more fuly justify its spendig for pollution control equipment going forward These three proposed fmdigs are al distinct from the proposed findigs of the Staff or any other intervenor. 3. Statement Showig Costs ICL requests $21,890 in intervenor funding, as shown in Exhibit A. Ths total includes $13,460 in expert witness fees and $8,430 in attorney's fees. ICL is not requesting any costs for postage, travel, or other expenses. Both the hourly rate and hour expended are reasonable for this complex, fuly litigated case. ICts attorney biling rate is below the curent rage for other intervening paries to account for his fewer years of experience. Our expert, Dr. Don Reading, is highy experienced and provided analytical expertise that fuly iluminated the issues. 4. Explanation of Cost Statement ICL is nonprofit orgaization supported solely through chatable donations. Whe some of our members are ratepayers of RMP, ICL does not represent any for-profit entity that stands to gain from rate decisions. To provide consistent, professional, and impactful advocacy, ICL has shifted its budgeting to dedicate a full-time, highy traed staff member to energy issues. Moreover, ICL funded the expertise of one of the most well-regarded experts in our state to assist in this matter. Both of these costs represent significant financial commitments in a time of dificult fundraising. Because charitable contributions ar inherently unstable, the availabilty of intervenor fundig is essential for ICL to paricipate in proceedigs before the Commission. 5. Statement of Difference ICts proposed findigs, both in substance and in support, difer from those offered by the ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 2 December 16, 2010 Staff. ICL proposed findings on rate design, irrgation load control, and pollution control costs. Residential Rate Design For schedule 1 customers, ICL proposed a $5.00 fixed charge as opposed to RMP's request for a $12.00 fixed charge. Whe the Staff also proposed a $5.00 fixed charge, ICL provided the Commission with additional analysis in Dr. Reading's testimony; cross examined RMP witness Griffth to highight the fixed rate in RMP's other states as well as the fixed rate in other Idao IOUs; and pointed the Commission to the disparate biling impacts of RMP's proposal, demonstrated in Exhibit 84 page 13. ICL proposed a unique rate design for schedule 1 customers consisting of three seasonaly sized tiers with equa seasonal rates. Ths proposal is distinct from Staffs two tiered rates with both seasonal size and price changes. The prefied testinony of Dr. Readig, as well as his testimony at hearig, provided a comprehensive analysis of this proposal for the Commission. More so than either RMP or the Staff, ICts proposal focused sharly on the unique charcteristics of RMP residential ratepayers in Idao. For schedule 36 customers, ICL proposed a lower fixed charge and seasonaly equa time of use rates. This contrasts with Staffs proposal to adopt RMP's proposed design but with a small change to their proposed increase. Agai, ICts proposed design for Schedule 36 focused sharly on the unique characteristics of RMP's residential customers in Idao. Finally, ICL also provided analytica background concerning the diference between time of use and amount of use rate designs. ICL also provided some analysis of the relationship between income and energy use. Whe not a specific proposed findig, we hope the Commission found this material iluminating to the issue of residential rate designs. Irrgation Load Control ICL proposed that the Commission order RMP to brig a revision of the irgation load ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 3 December 16, 2010 control progr before the Multi-State Protocol standig committee. Ths proposal difered from the Staff proposal by highighting the impact to fundig for other DSM progrs; provided additional and specific detai on how RMP treats the progr for planning puroses; and recognized that the proper procedur method is to brig the issue to the MSP committee. At hearng, ICL engaged RMP witness Hunter on this issue, eliciting furher explanation of the company position and statement that RMP supported ICts proposa. RMP also proposed some revisions to the progr includig increasing the eligible pump size. To asist the Commission in weighng these proposals, at hearg ICL attempted to tease out more details on the number of individua customers that could be impacted by this chage. Unfortunately, none of the witnesses could answer that question. Pollution Control Costs ICL was the only par in this matter to rase this issue-which constitutes a $475,000,000 addition to rate base. Recognizing that the intersection of federa Clean Air Act requirements and utilty ratemakg is a relatively new area, ICL offered a modest proposal to require furher explanation of this issue in the future. 6. Statement of Recommendation ICts proposals addressed issues that concern the entire body of utilty customers. Residential rate design generally concerns residential ratepayers. ICls proposed design focused on the most effective signals to reduce overal energy conservation thereby limiting energy costs for the entire utilty-a concern for all customers. Because al ratepayers contribute to the irrgation load control progr, ICts proposal to begi the process of reallocating these costs to other states withi RMP's system also benefits all Idao ratepayers. Finaly, ICts proposal for pollution control costs addresses a substantial rate base item, which agai is a concern for all utility customers. ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 4 December 16, 2010 Durg the hearng, ICL also drew out additional testinony to asist the Commission's decision in other issues. For example, ICL cross-examined RMP witness Hunter concerning DSM issues and the alternative funding scheme used in Washigton. With RMP witness Talman, ICL highighted the manner in which RMP uses the entire Dunlap wind rach. Because ICL does not represent any for-profit entity that stands to gain from this rate case, we paricipated in a manner that fully iluminated varous issues to assist the Commission in reaching a well-informed decision. 7. Statement Showig Clas of Customer ICL has individua members who are customers of RMP. Therefore, to the extent that ICL represents a specific customer class of the Company, it is the residential class. WHEREFORE, for the reasons stated above, ICL requests that the Commission grant this Application for Intervenor Fundig. Submitted this 16th day of December, 2010. Respectfully,~~- Benjamin J. Otto Idao Conservtion League ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 5 December 16, 2010 EXHBIT A Professonal Services of Dr. Don Readg, Ph.D.-$13,460 76 hours 55 minutes at $175 per hour (rounded to nearest dollar) 9/17/10 Meeting with ICL, IPUC 4:04 9/20/10 Review and analyze residential use data 4:42 9/20/10 Review and analyze testimonv 0:37 9/20/10 Review and analyze tarffs 1:58 9/21/10 Meet with ICL 0:45 9/21/10 Review and analyze residential use data 0:47 9/23/10 Review and analyze tarffs 0:39 9/23/10 Review and analyze orooosed residential rates 3:34 9/24/10 Review and analyze residential use data 1:10 9/27/10 Review and analyze orooosed residential rates 2:09 9/29/10 Telephone conference with IPUC staff 0:43 10/05/10 Review and analyze residential us data 1:22 10/05/10 Meeting with ICL. IPUC 1:59 10/05/10 Prepartion of testimonv 2:30 10/06/10 Prepartion of testimonv 7:28 10/07/10 Preoartion of testimonv 3:30 10/08/10 Preoartion of testimonv 2:09 10/08/10 Review pollution control studies 3:26 10/08/10 Telephone conference with ICL 1:43 10/11110 Review pollution control studies 1:15 10/13/10 Preparation of testimony 2:53 10/13/10 Telephone conference with ICL 1:14 10/14/10 Prepartion of testimony 1:13 10/18/10 Review and analyze fied testimony 1:46 11/02/10 Review and analyze margial costs 2:54 11/03/10 Review and analyze margial costs 1:38 11/05/10 Review and analyze margial costs 2:00 11/11/10 Review and analyze Wyoming DEO agreement 3:24 11/12/10 Review and analyze Wyoming DEO agreement 0:57 11/15110 Review and analyze Wyoming DEO agreement 3:06 11/16/10 Review and analyze Wyominl! DEO agreement 1:34 11/17/10 Review and analyze Wvominl! DEO agreement 1:06 11/19110 Review and analyze Wvominl! DEO agreement 1:03 11/22/10 Review and analyze Wvominl! DEO agreement 1:07 11/24/10 Preoartion for hearl!0:59 11/29/10 Prepartion for hearl!1:33 11/30/10 Attendace at hearl!1:54 ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 6 December 16, 2010 Attorneys Fees for Benjamin J. Otto-Total: $8,430 70 hours 15 minutes at $120 per hour 9/17/10 Meet with Readig re: scope of work, review RMP fiing and 3:15 discovery responses, outline initial position, discus furher research needs. 9/21/10 Meet with Readig re: review initial position on residential rates,0:45 discuss strategy, furher research planning 10/05/10 Meet with Readig re: outline testimony sections 0:45 10/08/10 Telephone conference with Readig re: irrgation load control 1:45 testimony outline, research needs 10/11/10 Edit draft testimony 4:30 10/12/10 Edit draft testimony 3:15 10/13/10 Edit draft testimony 3:45 10/13/10 Telephone conference with Readig finalize testinony for fiing 1:15 10/14/10 Final edit of testimony, prepare exhibit and certificate of servce, and 6:15 fie with the PUC 10/18/10 Review diect testimony of Staff and intervening paries 4:15 10/19/10 Review diect testimony of Staff and intervening paries 3:45 10/21/10 Research marginal costs of Idao utiltes, Emai Readig re: same 1:15 11/10/10 Review Wyoming DEQ agreement, emai Readig re same 1:30 11/23/10 Review readig analysis of Wyoming DEQ pollution control 1:15 agreement 11/26/10 Prepare for hearig 3:15 11/29/10 Prepare for hearng 2:45 11/30/10 Attend technical hearg 8:00 12/01/10 Attend technica hearg 8:00 12/02/10 Attend technical hearig 8:00 12/15/10 Prepare application for intervenor fundig 1:30 Note: ICL tracks biling in 15-minute increments and rounds down for portions less than 10 minutes long. ICL Application for Intervenor Fundig 7 December 16, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 16th day of December 2010, I delivered tre and correct copies of the foregoing APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNING in CASE NO. PAC-E- 10-07 to the following via the method of service noted: Hand delivery: Jean Jewell Commission Secretary (Original provided) Idaho Public Utilties Commission 427 W. Washington St. Boise, ID 83702-5983 Electronic Mai: Scott Woodbur Deputy Attorney General Idao Public Utilties Commission 472 W. Washigton P.O. Box 83702 Boise Idao 83702 Scott. woodburpuc.daho.gov Agrum Tim Buller Jason Harrs Agrium Inc. 3010 Conda Road Soda Springs, ID 83276 Fax: 208-547-4948 tbul 1 er(g agrium.com jahars(g agrium.com Staff IIPA PacifiCorp Daniel E. Solander Mark Moench Ted Weston Rocky Mountain Power 201 S. Main Street, Suite 2300 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 danieL. solander(Ðpacificorp. com mark.moench(Ðpacificorp.com ted. weston(Ðpacificorp.com datarequest(Ðpacificorp.com Eric 1. Olsen Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge & Baiey, Charered P.O. Box 1391; 201 E. Center Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391 Fax: (208) 232-6109 eloCPracinelaw.net Paul J. Hickey Hiskey & Evans LLP 1800 Carey Ave., Suite 700 P.O. Box 467 Cheyenne Wy 82003 phickey(g hickeyeyans .com Anthony Yankel 29814 Lae Road Bay Vilage, Ohio 44140 Fax: 440-808-1450 tonyCyankel.net Monsanto Rada C. Budge Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge & Baiey, Charered December 16, 2010 P.O. Box 1391; 201 E. Center Pocatello, Idao 83204-1391 Fax: (208) 232-6109 rcbCPracinelaw.net CAPAI Katie Iverson Bruaker & Associates 17244 W. Cordova Cour Sunrise, Ariona 85387 Fax: (314) 275-7036 kiversonCPconsultbai.com Brad M. Purdy Attorney At Law 2019 N. 17th st Boise, Id 83702 bmpurdyChotmai.com PIIC James R Smith Monsanto Company P.O. Box 816 Soda Sprigs, Idao 83276 Fax: 208-547-3312 jim.r.smithCPmonsato.com Melinda Davison Davison Van Cleve, P.C. 333 SW Taylor Suite 400 Portland, Or 97204 mjdCPdvclaw.com Ronald Wiliams Wiliams Bradbur, P.e. 10 1 5 W Hayes St. Boise, Id 83702 ron CPiamsbradbur.com A6l Benjamin J. Otto December 16,2010