Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240119Application.pdf 1407 W. North Temple, Suite 330 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 January 19, 2024 VIA ELECTRONIC DELIVERY Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 11331 W. Chinden Blvd Building 8 Suite 201A Boise, ID 83714 RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR APPROVAL OF A CAPACITY DEFICIENCY PERIOD TO BE USED FOR AVOIDED COST CALCULATIONS Attention: Commission Secretary Please find for filing Rocky Mountain Power’s Application in the above-referenced matter along with confidential workpapers. Informal inquiries may be directed to Mark Alder, Idaho Regulatory Manager at (801) 220-2313. Very truly yours, Joelle Steward Senior Vice President, Regulation and Customer & Community Solutions RECEIVED Friday, January 19, 2024 3:49:07 PM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CASE NO. PAC-E-24-01 Joe Dallas (ISB# 10330) 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone No. (360) 560-1937 joseph.dallas@pacificorp.com Attorney for Rocky Mountain Power BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR APPROVAL OF A CAPACITY DEFICIENCY PERIOD TO BE USED FOR AVOIDED COST CALCULATIONS CASE NO. PAC-E-24-01 APPLICATION Rocky Mountain Power, a division of PacifiCorp (“the Company”), in accordance with Idaho Code §61-502, §61-503, RP 052, Order Nos. 32697 and 32802 in Case No. GNR-E-11-03 and Order Nos. 35834 and 35882 in Case No. PAC-E-22-14, hereby respectfully submits this application (“Application”) to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”) for approval of the capacity deficiency period determination to be used in avoided cost calculations using the Surrogate Avoided Resource (“SAR”) methodology applicable to small qualifying facilities (“QFs”) eligible for standard pricing (known as “SAR-Based Contracts”) and in the Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”) methodology applicable to larger QFs eligible for project-specific pricing (known as “IRP-Based Contracts”). This application is intended to establish the capacity deficiency period for both SAR-Based Contracts and IRP-Based Contracts.1 As more fully described below, this update identifies Rocky Mountain Power’s capacity deficiency period in the 1 See In the Matter of Rocky Mountain Power’s Application for Approval of a Capacity Deficiency Period to be Used for Avoided Cost Calculations, Case No. PAC-E-22-14, Order No. 35834, p.5 “The Commission has previously ordered that public utility companies use the capacity deficiency period to determine capacity payments for IRP- and SAR-based contracts to ensure QF’s are only compensated for costs they avoid in the Company’s system. See Order Nos. 33377, 33159, 33898, and 33933. The Commission reiterates the need for the Company to do so in this case through a compliance filing”. 2 summer of 2024 and explains how the deficiency period was identified. In support of its Application, Rocky Mountain Power states as follows: 1. Rocky Mountain Power is authorized to do and is doing business in the state of Idaho. The Company provides retail electric service to approximately 88,780 customers in the state and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. Rocky Mountain Power is a public utility in the state of Idaho pursuant to Idaho Code § 61-129. COMMUNICATIONS AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS 2. Communications regarding this Application should be addressed to: Mark Alder 1407 West North Temple, Suite 330 Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 Telephone: (801) 220-2313 Email: mark.alder@pacificorp.com Ron Scheirer 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 600 Portland, Oregon 97232 Telephone: (503) 813-6484 Email: ron.scheirer@pacificorp.com In addition, the Company respectfully requests that all data requests regarding this matter be addressed to one or more of the following: By e-mail (preferred) datarequest@pacificorp.com By regular mail Data Request Response Center PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 BACKGROUND 3. Commission Order No. 32697 directed the utilities to initiate a case outside of their IRP filing to establish the capacity deficiency period to be used in the utility's SAR methodology: 3 “We find it reasonable and fair to subject each utility's determination of capacity deficiency to further scrutiny. Therefore, when a utility submits its Integrated Resource Plan to the Commission, a case shall be initiated to determine the capacity deficiency to be utilized in the SAR Methodology. The capacity deficiency determined through the IRP planning process will be the starting point, and will be presumed to be correct subject to the outcome of the proceeding.”2 4. In Order No. 32697, the Commission acknowledged that “some determinations made within the IRP process have an impact on calculations under the SAR and IRP methodologies. Specifically, the IRP process determines when the utility will experience a need for new capacity.”3 The Commission ordered that payments to QFs should recognize the utility’s capacity needs, stating: “In calculating a QF's ability to contribute to a utility's need for capacity, we find it reasonable for the utilities to only begin payments for capacity at such time that the utility becomes capacity deficient. If a utility is capacity surplus, then capacity is not being avoided by the purchase of QF power. By including a capacity payment only when the utility becomes capacity deficient, the utilities are paying rates that are a more accurate reflection of true avoided cost for the QF power.”4 5. In Order No. 35415, the Commission stated that “all future L&R Balances included in the capacity deficiency date update for avoided costs must contain the most up-to-date information available at the time of filing.”5 6. In Order No. 34918, the Commission indicated that early retirement of coal-fired thermal resources should not be reflected in the load and resource balance, “Unless and until this Commission evaluates and approves an early retirement date…”6 2 In the Matter of the Commission’s Review of PURPA QF Contract Provisions Including the Surrogate Avoided Resource (SAR) and Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) Methodologies for Calculating Avoided Cost Rates, Case No. GNR-U-11-03, Order No. 32697, p. 23. 3 Order No. 32697, p.23. 4 Order No. 32697, p.21. 5 In the matter of Idaho Power Company’s Application for Approval of the Capacity Deficiency to be Utilized for Avoided Cost Calculations, Case No. IPC-E-21-09, Order No. 35415, p.10. 6 In the Matter of Rocky Mountain Power’s Application for Approval of a Capacity Deficiency Period to be Used for Avoided Cost Calculations, Case No. PAC-E-20-13, Order No. 34918, p.5-6. 4 7. In Order No. 35834 the Commission ordered a compliance filing based on the Company’s application and Staff comments. Order No. 35882 waived the compliance items (“Compliance Items”) conditional upon the Company incorporating the Compliance Items into the Company’s application for its 2023 capacity deficiency case.7 The table on page 9 of this Application delineates how the Company has met each Compliance Item. REQUEST TO ESTABLISH AVOIDED COST DEFICIENCY PERIOD 5. On March 31, 2023, Rocky Mountain Power filed its 2023 IRP with the Commission. The 2023 IRP includes the results of the Company's Capacity Loads and Resources without Resource Additions for the summer season in Table 6.11 on pages 165-166 and for the winter season in Table 6.12 on pages 167-168. The capacity balance is generally highest for summer peak loads, with the summer peak occurring annually in July, as the Company is expected to be deficient in the summer prior to becoming deficient in the winter. The capacity balance is developed by determining firm resource capacity available, including the Company’s firm access to imports from the wholesale market (“Front Office Transactions” or “FOTs”), less the system obligation and a 13 percent planning reserve margin. 6. In light of the risks associated with the evolving resource mix across the west, the 2023 IRP included a Front Office Transaction limit of 500 megawatts in the summer, and 1,000 megawatts in the Winter, as shown in Table 5.8 on page 114. To ensure reliable system operations, the transmission system operator of each balancing authority area (“BAA”) within the Western Interconnect is required to maintain contingency reserves equal to three percent of its load and three percent of its generation, as discussed within the 2023 IRP in Appendix F (Flexible Reserve 7 In the Matter of Rocky Mountain Power’s Application for Approval of a Capacity Deficiency Period to be Used for Avoided Cost Calculations, Case No. PAC-E-22-14, Order No. 35834, p.12 and Order No. 35882, p 2. 5 Study). When the Company purchases power from counterparties whose generation resources are outside of its BAAs, which is typical, the three percent contingency reserve obligation associated with generation remains in the source BAA, and the counterparty remains responsible for it as one of the ancillary services provided by the transmission system operator for the BAA in which their generator resides. Because the Company avoids the contingency reserve obligation associated with such purchases, which would otherwise be required if it generated the associated power itself, the effective capacity value of market purchases is three percent higher than the equivalent quantity of generation capacity. 7. The 2023 IRP shows that the Company’s load and existing resource balance requires market purchases in excess of the Front Office Transaction limit and throughout the planning horizon; however, several inputs must be modified to account for changes since the 2023 IRP was prepared as well as the treatment of certain resources identified in Commission orders. 8. The following adjustments were made to account for committed and uncommitted resource impacts, relative to the representation in the 2023 IRP, specifically: • Removing uncommitted early coal retirements, consistent with Order 34918. • Adding contracts signed since the 2023 IRP Update was prepared, and removing contracts that have terminated or expired. • Adding contracted resources that have not yet come online, which were not included in the 2023 IRP tables presenting the load and resource balance without additions. • Adjusting QF renewal assumptions: In the 2023 IRP, QFs in all states were assumed to have a 79% probability of renewal at the end of their current contract term, and at the end of the current contract the modeled capacity and energy of each QF 6 continues at 79% of its prior level. For the avoided cost deficiency period determination, the load and resource balance has been adjusted so that all Idaho QFs renew at 100% of their current contracted levels, while QFs in all other states expire at the end of their current contracts. • Adding demand response programs that have received Commission approval, including projected growth in those programs over time. • Adding FOTs that have already been contracted. 9. After accounting for the adjustments described above, the first capacity deficiency of 1,327 megawatts occurs in the summer of 2024, as shown in Table No. 1. The first winter capacity deficiency of 890 megawatts also occurs in 2024 as shown in Table No. 2. Summer capacity deficiencies continue to be somewhat larger than winter capacity deficiencies throughout the IRP study horizon. 7 Table No. 1 Updated Summer Peak Loads and Resources Table No. 2 Updated Winter Peak Loads and Resources 10. Based on these updates, the Company requests that the Commission find the summer of 2024 as the first capacity deficiency period when capacity payments should be made to QFs under the SAR and IRP avoided cost methodologies. System 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Resources 10,496 8,382 8,381 8,265 7,780 7,068 7,229 7,287 6,853 6,158 Obligation 10,919 11,163 11,110 11,285 11,609 11,733 11,727 11,830 11,816 11,857 Planning Reserves (13%)1,419 1,451 1,444 1,467 1,509 1,525 1,524 1,538 1,536 1,541 Obligation + Reserves 12,338 12,614 12,554 12,752 13,119 13,259 13,251 13,368 13,352 13,398 System Position (1,842) (4,232) (4,173) (4,488) (5,339) (6,191) (6,022) (6,080) (6,499) (7,241) FOT Limit with Reserves 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 Sufficiency/(Deficiency)(1,327) (3,717) (3,658) (3,973) (4,824) (5,676) (5,507) (5,565) (5,984) (6,726) System 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 Total Resources 6,185 6,097 6,917 5,715 4,351 4,372 3,772 3,852 4,008 Obligation 11,904 12,003 12,101 12,087 12,180 12,259 12,426 12,571 12,840 Planning Reserves (13%)1,547 1,560 1,573 1,571 1,583 1,594 1,615 1,634 1,669 Obligation + Reserves 13,451 13,564 13,674 13,658 13,763 13,852 14,042 14,205 14,509 System Position (7,266) (7,467) (6,756) (7,943) (9,412) (9,481) (10,270) (10,353) (10,501) FOT Limit with Reserves 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 515 Sufficiency/(Deficiency)(6,751) (6,952) (6,241) (7,428) (8,897) (8,966) (9,755) (9,838) (9,986) System 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Resources 8,555 8,896 8,755 9,352 8,648 7,725 7,484 8,520 8,209 7,460 Obligation 9,271 9,486 9,494 9,754 10,026 10,059 10,076 10,115 10,117 10,213 Planning Reserves (13%)1,205 1,233 1,234 1,268 1,303 1,308 1,310 1,315 1,315 1,328 Obligation + Reserves 10,476 10,719 10,728 11,022 11,329 11,366 11,385 11,429 11,432 11,540 System Position (1,920) (1,824) (1,974) (1,669) (2,682) (3,641) (3,902) (2,909) (3,223) (4,080) FOT Limit with Reserves 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 Sufficiency/(Deficiency)(890) (794) (944) (639) (1,652) (2,611) (2,872) (1,879) (2,193) (3,050) System 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 Total Resources 7,179 6,696 6,863 6,441 5,037 4,833 4,403 4,237 4,421 Obligation 10,272 10,354 10,365 10,427 10,544 10,687 10,814 10,945 11,130 Planning Reserves (13%)1,335 1,346 1,348 1,355 1,371 1,389 1,406 1,423 1,447 Obligation + Reserves 11,607 11,700 11,713 11,782 11,915 12,076 12,220 12,367 12,576 System Position (4,428) (5,004) (4,850) (5,341) (6,878) (7,243) (7,817) (8,131) (8,155) FOT Limit with Reserves 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 1,030 Sufficiency/(Deficiency)(3,398) (3,974) (3,820) (4,311) (5,848) (6,213) (6,787) (7,101) (7,125) 8 11. Rocky Mountain Power submits this Application to establish the capacity deficiency period as set forth in Commission Orders No. 32697 and No. 32802, and requests that the Commission approve the capacity deficiency period to be used in its SAR and IRP-method calculations. COMPLIANCE ITEMS 12. The Company has addressed the Compliance Items in Order No. 35814. The following is a summary of the Compliance Items included with this filing: determine when capacity payments begin for both IRP-based and SAR-based contracts/Determination deficiency period be set for both IRP-based and SAR-based contracts. 20-year IRP planning horizon, instead of the 9-year filing/Peak Load Forecast and Future Obligations the 20-year IRP planning horizon. Update method, to determine capacity contributions resources added after the 2023 IRP. state of Idaho, unless the Company has information PURPA contracts located in the state of Idaho. executed through December 31, 2023, shortly above the FOTs limit only if it increases the amount of available FOTs that the Company can rely on to applied in the L&R as discussed in this application. programs that is clearly labeled so that the L&R in the Compliance filing can be verified. program modeled in the 2023 IRP is identified as Commission-approved or future. A calculation of the growth in the approved DR 9 Company can use to m programs in the Company’s L&R. The Commission included in the Company’s L&R MODIFIED PROCEDURE 13. Rocky Mountain Power believes that a hearing is not necessary to consider the issues presented herein and respectfully requests that this Application be processed under Modified Procedure; i.e., by written submissions rather than by hearing. RP 201 et seq. If, however, the Commission determines that a technical hearing is required, the Company stands ready to prepare and present its testimony in such hearing. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 14. This filing, specifically the Confidential Workpapers, contain confidential information including trade secret and other Company confidential information exempt from public review under Idaho Code §§ 74-104–109 and Idaho Public Utilities Commission’s Rule of Procedure 67. CONCLUSION WHEREFORE, Rocky Mountain Power respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order authorizing this Application be processed under Modified Procedure and approving the capacity deficiency period beginning July 2024, be used in the Company's avoided cost determinations under the SAR methodology, for both SAR-Based Contracts and IRP-Based Contracts, as shown in Table No. 1 above. 10 DATED this 19th day of January, 2024. ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER ________________________ Joe Dallas 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 2000 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone No. (360) 560-1937 joseph.dallas@pacificorp.com