Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230731Comments_2.pdf1 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Fuller (scissordog@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message <kwautomail@phone2ac�on.com> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 9:35 PM To: Jan Noriyuki <jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: Comment on RMP IRP, Docket # PAC-E-23-10 CAUTION: This email originated outside the State of Idaho network. Verify links and atachments BEFORE you click or open, even if you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your agency service desk with any concerns. Dear Idaho Public U�li�es Commission, I am deeply concerned about Rocky Mountain Power?s recently submited 2023 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which does litle to reliably commit to reducing our state?s greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effec�ve manner. Instead, this plan maintains our reliance on fossil fuels by con�nuing to rely some coal plants well past 2030 while conver�ng others to natural gas, which is infamous for vola�le price swings. The plan also relies heavily on new nuclear power, which the company is sta�ng will be ?crucial? for its transi�on off of fossil fuels. Nuclear hasn?t been a viable solu�on for our na�on's energy needs in decades, and it faces significant hurdles before it can even be considered an op�on. I strongly urge the Commission to consider these shortcomings when making a decision regarding Rocky Mountain Power?s IRP. Please remember that it's the Idaho ratepayers who will be stuck paying the costs when investments in risky technology like nuclear and carbon capture don?t bear fruit.Renewable energy, like wind and solar, are both cost effec�ve and ready to roll out now. Let?s take advantage of this moment and the opportuni�es in legisla�on like the Infla�on Reduc�on Act to bring real solu�ons here to Idaho. I urge the Idaho Commission to not acknowledge the riskiest aspects of Rocky Mountain Power?s plan, including con�nued reliance on coal, despite increasing federal regulatory pressure, and unrealis�c op�mism that three first-of-their-kind nuclear facili�es will materialize on �me and on budget. Sincerely, Richard Fuller 474 Rimrock Dr Saint Maries, ID 83861 scissordog@gmail.com (208) 245-4093 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more informa�on, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Schumacher (rspyboy7@gmail.com) Sent You a Personal Message <kwautomail@phone2ac�on.com> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 2:45 PM To: Jan Noriyuki <jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov> Subject: Comment on RMP IRP, Docket # PAC-E-23-10 CAUTION: This email originated outside the State of Idaho network. Verify links and atachments BEFORE you click or open, even if you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your agency service desk with any concerns. Dear Idaho Public U�li�es Commission, I am deeply concerned about Rocky Mountain Power?s recently submited 2023 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which does litle to reliably commit to reducing our state?s greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effec�ve manner. Instead, this plan maintains our reliance on fossil fuels by con�nuing to rely some coal plants well past 2030 while conver�ng others to natural gas, which is infamous for vola�le price swings. The plan also relies heavily on new nuclear power, which the company is sta�ng will be ?crucial? for its transi�on off of fossil fuels. Nuclear hasn?t been a viable solu�on for our na�on's energy needs in decades, and it faces significant hurdles before it can even be considered an op�on. I strongly urge the Commission to consider these shortcomings when making a decision regarding Rocky Mountain Power?s IRP. Please remember that it's the Idaho ratepayers who will be stuck paying the costs when investments in risky technology like nuclear and carbon capture don?t bear fruit.Renewable energy, like wind and solar, are both cost effec�ve and ready to roll out now. Let?s take advantage of this moment and the opportuni�es in legisla�on like the Infla�on Reduc�on Act to bring real solu�ons here to Idaho. I urge the Idaho Commission to not acknowledge the riskiest aspects of Rocky Mountain Power?s plan, including con�nued reliance on coal, despite increasing federal regulatory pressure, and unrealis�c op�mism that three first-of-their-kind nuclear facili�es will materialize on �me and on budget. Sincerely, Richard Schumacher 3173 W Fieldstream Dr Meridian, ID 83646 rspyboy7@gmail.com (208) 631-2468 This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club. If you need more informa�on, please contact Member Care at Sierra Club at member.care@sierraclub.org or (415) 977-5673. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------