HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210527Hemstreet Exhibit 20-Redacted.pdfREDACTEI)
Case No. PAC-E-21-07
Exhibit No. 20
Witress: Timothy J. Hemsteet
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
REDACTED
Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Timothy J. Hemstreet
Wind Costs Comparison
May 2021
REDACTED
New Wind and Repowering Projects Cost Comparison to Pre-Approved Amounts
All values in Smillions
Pre-Approved
EV 2O2O New Wind Projects
Cedar Springs ll 200 MW
Ekola Flats 250 MW
TB Flats 500 MW
Total Pre-Approved New Wind Projects
I Cost r
As-Filed Capltal
Cost (June
EV2020 Repowering Projects
Dunlap I
Glenrock I
Glenrock lll
Goodnoe Hills
High Plains
Leaning Juniper
Marengo I
Marengo ll
McFadden Ridge
Rolling Hills
Seven Mile Hill I
Seven Mile Hill ll
Total New Wind + Wind Repowering
Removal Cost
included in
Capital
Forecast PIS
Forecast PIS
Amount
Forecast PIS
Rocky Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 20 Page 'l of 1
Case No. PAC-E-21-07
Witness: Timothy J. Hemstreet
Difference Difference
Foote Creek I Repowering Project
Notes:
1 Pre-Approved amounts for New Wind Projects from Case No. PAC-E-17-07, Link Exhibit No. 54
'As-filed amounts for Repowering Projects from Case No. PAC-E-17-06, Hemstreet Exhibit No. 3
3 Although not included in revenue requirement calculations, removal costs included for consistency with original filing