Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210527Hemstreet Exhibit 20-Redacted.pdfREDACTEI) Case No. PAC-E-21-07 Exhibit No. 20 Witress: Timothy J. Hemsteet BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER REDACTED Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Timothy J. Hemstreet Wind Costs Comparison May 2021 REDACTED New Wind and Repowering Projects Cost Comparison to Pre-Approved Amounts All values in Smillions Pre-Approved EV 2O2O New Wind Projects Cedar Springs ll 200 MW Ekola Flats 250 MW TB Flats 500 MW Total Pre-Approved New Wind Projects I Cost r As-Filed Capltal Cost (June EV2020 Repowering Projects Dunlap I Glenrock I Glenrock lll Goodnoe Hills High Plains Leaning Juniper Marengo I Marengo ll McFadden Ridge Rolling Hills Seven Mile Hill I Seven Mile Hill ll Total New Wind + Wind Repowering Removal Cost included in Capital Forecast PIS Forecast PIS Amount Forecast PIS Rocky Mountain Power Exhibit No. 20 Page 'l of 1 Case No. PAC-E-21-07 Witness: Timothy J. Hemstreet Difference Difference Foote Creek I Repowering Project Notes: 1 Pre-Approved amounts for New Wind Projects from Case No. PAC-E-17-07, Link Exhibit No. 54 'As-filed amounts for Repowering Projects from Case No. PAC-E-17-06, Hemstreet Exhibit No. 3 3 Although not included in revenue requirement calculations, removal costs included for consistency with original filing