20190701Comments (2).pdf

Diane Holt
From:
Sent:
To:
[e-mail]
Sunday, June 30, 2019 5:22 PM
Beverly Barker; Diane Holt; Erik Jorgensen; Matthew Evans
Case Comment Form: David ErhartSubject:
Name: David Erhart
Case Number: PAC E 19 08
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 1437 N 630 E
SHELLEY lD,83274
Name of Utility Company: Rocky Mountain Power
Comment: 1. The customer letter from Rocky Mtn Pwr (dated June 26, 2019) is incorrect in that I only receive 11.13
cents per kilowatt-hour generated, not the 12.5 cents in the letter.
2. The proposal for changing the net meter rate only talks to pay back of a generating system. I own my system. My
system was sized and constructed to result in me having aZero electric bill over the full year. The proposed change to
8.5 cents per kWh is a 24% reduction. This results in my system being24% undersized. This will force me to increase the
generating capacity of my system by 4 panels at an approximate cost of 54800 in order to retain my zero electric cost.
This is an undue burden on the home generator.
Unique ldentifier: 67 .6L.L87 .L54
1
Diane Holt
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Name: Edwin Kirkpatrick
Case Number: PAC-E-19-08
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 6l Aries Dr.
Rexburg 1D,83440
Name of Utility Company: Rocky Mountain Power
Comment: ln reference to this case number I would like to voice my concern and opposition to this change. I became a
net-metering customer April 5, 2018 and this, to me, is almost like a "bait and switch" situation. One of the reasons I
decided to install solar power was the credit I received on excess electrical generation was the same as the rate I was
paying for electric power. We are in the process of building a new primary residence and I would like to to be able to
justify the cost of installing solar power on it while the 30% federal credit is still in effect and the pay back period is
within 10 years - not more than 14 years. I see no justification for this change in the letter I received from Rocky
Mountain Power and feel this is a "knee-jerk reaction" to the number of customers that are installing solar power on the
part of Rocky Mountain Power. I request that the PUC not grant this termination of the Rocky Mountain Power Net-
Metering program!
U niq ue ldentifier: 69.92.232.tOO
[e-mail]
Monday, July 1,2019 2:05 PM
Beverly Barker; Diane Holt; Erik Jorgensen; Matthew Evans
Case Comment Form: Edwin Kirkpatrick
1