HomeMy WebLinkAbout20150626Comments (5 Total).pdfJame5 Mulhern,President &Chief Executive Officer I Randy Mooney,Chairman
PAGE @2
Agri-Merk,Inc.
Associated Milk
Producers Inc.
Bonqards’Creameries
Cooperative Milk
Producers Association
Cortland Bulk Fvlilk
Praducers Cooperative
Dairy Pa mets of
Ameflca,Inc.
Dairymen’s Markeling
CooperaWe,Inc.
EI’swodh
Cooperative Creamery
Farmers
Cooperah Creamery
Famrn9rstDairy
Cooperative
First District
Association
Foremost Farms USA
Land O’Lakes.Inc.
Lone Star Milk
Producers
Maryland &Virginia
Milk Producers
Cooperative
Association
Michigan MilkProducersAssociallon
Mid-West
Derymen’s Company
MountJoy Farmers
Cooperative
Association
Northwest Dairy
Association
QneldaMadison MPk
Produce’s CooperaNe
Association
Prairie Farms
Dairy,Inc.
Premier Milk Inc.
Scicto County
Cooperative Milk
Producers Association
SelectMilk
Producers,Inc.
Southeast Mik,Inc.
Sc Albans Cooperative
Creamery,mc,
Swiss Vaney Farms
Company
Tillamooli CountyCreameryAssocIation
United Dairymen
of Arizona
Upstate Niagara
Cooperative.Inc.
Zia Milk
Producers.Inc.
June 26,2015
Commissioners Kjellander,Raper.and Redford
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 V.Washington St.
Boise,Idaho 83702
Re;Dockets AVU-E-1 5-01,IPC-E-15-01,PAC-E-15-01
Dear Commissioners:
WA FAX
The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF),based in Arlington,VA,develops andcarriesoutpoliciesthatadvancethewell-being of dairy producers and the cooperativestheyown.The members ofNMPF4s cooperatives produce the majority ofthe US.milksupply,making NMPF the voice of more than 32,000 dairy producers on Capitol Hill andwithgovernmentagencies.Visit www.nmpf.org for more information.
NMPF submits these comments in response to the Commission’s proposed rulemakingrelatedtoshorteningthedurationofPURPAcontractsfrom20yearsto5yearsorless.NMPF has grave concerns that the proposed rule will negatively impact the adoption ofanaerobicdigestersandnutrientremovaltechnologiesondairyfarmsinthestateofIdaho
--a major dairy state..Digesters and related technology are critically important to the dairyindustryandhelpreducegreenhousegasemissionsandnutrientlosses.We must encouragetheiruse,not discourage them.Digesters are very expensive to install and operate anddespitetheenvironmentalbenefitstheyproduce,they are difficult make workeconomically.Selling electricity to the grid at a fair rate is the primary’means by which adigestercanbefeasible,limiting that ability will be counterproductive.NMPF and theInnovationCenterforU.S.Dairy,as well as our member cooperatives,have been sl:rivingtoencouragetheadoptionofdigestertechnolo’For a variety of reasons which include,among other things.helping to meet our industry’s goal of a 25%reduction of greenhousegas(GUG)emissions by 2020)This rule,as proposed.is a disincentive.Ifthe Public UtilityCommissionchoosestolimitpowerpurchaseagreements(PPA’s)to five years or less,thatdisincentivewillalmostcertainlyendtheadoptionofdigestertechnologyinIdaho.We donotbelievethatisinthebestinterestsofthestateofIdaho,its citizens and the dairy industryinIdaho.
While we note that the Commission has imposed an interim live-year limit as noted in theMay8,2015 notice of public meetings For solar and wind projects largerthan 100-kilowattsandforallotherrenewableprojectslargerthan10megawattswhileitconsiderstwoutilitycompanyrequeststocapPPA‘5 at 2 or 3 years.We also note that in your February 6,2015
09:53:23 am.0o—25—20r5 2 7033419323 INN
86/26/2815 11:48 7838419328 NMPF
215JU213 P1 (:1,6
3L1T!c
l htlt;//www,
09:53:238.m.00—20—2015 3 J 7038419328
@6/26/2015 11:40 7038419328 NMPF PAGE 03
order that all contracts are limited to 5 years.The apparent inconsistency is concerning.Inmostcasesdairydigestersaredesignedtogenerate1MW,with a few that could potentiallygoto2or3MW-Ifthe May 8th notice is correct it would appear that dairy digesters wouldbeunarfected.If however,the February 6h Order is correct and daiiy digesters PPA’s arccappedat5years.or less when a final determination is made,you are in essence banningdairydigestersinyourstate.
A decision to build and utilize digester technolo’is risky in many cases and addinguncertaintyintheformofshortdurationPPAwherethereisalreadyriskwillspelldisaster.Tnstead of the approach taken in the proposal,NMPF urges the Commission to retain a 20-year PPA term for anaerobic digesters due to the well-established recognition of the factthattheydeliverenormousenvironmentalbenefitsandthefactthata5-year or less PPAwillterminateanyandallconsiderationoftheiradoption.
NMPF appreciates the opportunity that the Commission has provided for consideration ofourcomments.We are pleased to answer any questions you may have or to provide anyadditionalinformationwhichyoumayrequire.
Sincerely,
Clay Detlefsen
Senior ‘iee President.Regulatory and Environmental Affairs &Staff CounselNationalMilkProducersFederation
2
June 24,2015 Ji 2b f 1:29
Idaho Public Utilities Commission —
472 W.Washington Street Li I IL1fi;uMfSiQN
Boise,Idaho 83720-0074
Re:AVU-E-15-01
I PC-E-15-01
PAC-E-15-03
Dear Commissioners:
The League of Women Voters of Idaho (LWVID)requests that you deny the petitions to reduce the
power purchase contract length with qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act
(PURPA).We believe reducing the maximum contract length to two years would effectively eliminate
future large scale solar projects from being built in Idaho.
The LWVID is a statewide,non-partisan organization that studies issues and comes to consensus before
adopting any position.The state League and the national Leagues have adopted positions that support
policy,legislation,regulation and funding to attain clean air standards,reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and to increase energy efficiency and reliance on renewable energy resources.
Regulated utilities should act,and be regulated,in the public interest.In the League’s studied opinion,
it is in the public interest to transition away from polluting,carbon-emitting sources of energy to
renewable energy resources.Utilities must change their fuel mix and business models to less harmful
and ultimately more cost-efficient generation sources.Please require the largest utilities in our state to
give qualifying facilities the chance to produce clean energy and related jobs.
Judy Edwards,President
League of Women Voters of Ida ho
P.O.Box 153
Coeur d’Alene,Idaho 83816
Jean Jewell
From:jennifer@dgardiner.com
Sent:Friday,June 26,2015 12:41 PM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:jennifer@dgardiner.com
Subject:Case Comment Form:Jennifer Kefer
Name:Jennifer Kefer
Case Number:AVU-E-15-0l,IPC-E-15-01,PAC-E-15-01
Email:jennifer@dgardiner.corn
Telephone:202 365 2194
Address:2609 11th Street North
Arlington VA,22201
Name of Utility Company:Alliance for Industrial Efficiency Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:June 26,2015
Commissioners Paul Kjellander,Mack A.Redford,and Kristine Raper Idaho Public Utilities
Commission
472 W.Washington
Boise,ID 83702
Re:Dockets AVU-E-15-01,IPC-E-15-01,PAC-E-15-01
In the Matter of Idaho Power Company’s Petition to Modify Terms and Conditions of PURPA
Purchase Agreements
Dear Commissioners Kjellander,Redford and Raper:
I am writing on behalf of the Alliance for Industrial Efficiency to express out concerns
about Idaho Power Company’s recent petition to shorten the required power purchase agreement
contract term from 20 to two years.The Alliance is a diverse coalition of labor,contractor,
business and environmental groups committed to increasing deployment of combined heat and
power (CHP)and waste heat to power (WHP)technologies.Our membership includes businesses
throughout the country,including 39 member companies in Idaho.We urge you to maintain
standard policies for 20-year contract lengths of power purchase agreements under PURPA.
If the Commission reduces the length of purchase contracts,this decision would significantly
set back the deployment of clean and efficient CHP and WHP facilities.Enacted in 1978,PURPA
has helped installed CHP capacity grow by 550 percent (from about 12,000 MW in 1980 to more
than 66,000 MW in 2000)enabling businesses to reduce energy consumption,save money,create
jobs,and increase grid reliability.(1)This policy has been successful because long-term
revenue streams have enabled financing for these large projects,which has no doubt helped at
least 12 cogeneration facilities in the state of Idaho.(2)Now is not the time to reverse a
successful energy policy.
Decreasing the term of PURPA contracts would significantly chill construction of future CHP
and WHP projects.A typical CHP system requires a substantial up-front investment and remains
in place for decades;EPA estimates a typical 10.6 MW gas turbine represents a $20-million
investment and the median age of these systems (which represent 64 percent of CHP capacity)
is 20 years.(3),(4)Financing should similarly reflect the useful life of a CHP facility,
rather than be limited to the proposed two-year power purchase agreement term.Long-term
financing is a crucial component of developing projects with significant up front costs such
as CHP and WHP facilities.(5)Limiting required power purchase agreements for CHP and WHP
1
facilities would therefore diminish CHP developments this would weaken manufacturing
competitiveness,increase Idaho’s risk to variable fuel costs,and increase emissions of
harmful air pollutants.Accordingly,we urge the Commission to restore the requirement for
20-year power purchase agreements for qualifying facilities.
By producing both heat and electricity from a single fuel source,CHP systems can be twice as
efficient as the separate generation of heat and electricity,while WHP captures waste heat
to generate electricity with no incremental emissions.CHP systems enhance the reliability of
critical facilities such as hospitals and universities,make manufacturing facilities more
efficient,reduce volatile fuel costs and bolster industry.PURPA allows these facilities to
sell surplus power back to the grid at prices that protect electricity consumers,providing a
revenue stream that has been a key factor firms have considered when adopting these
technologies.(6)The combined savings and revenue stream to businesses allows industry to
reinvest these funds to increase both jobs and productivity,creating cascading positive
effects for Idaho’s economy.Reducing the required term of power purchase agreements to two
years would eliminate a guaranteed market for clean and efficient electricity generated by
CHP,making firms less likely to invest the large up-front costs that these systems require.
We appreciate the Idaho Public Utility Commission’s efforts to make Idaho’s energy sector
reliable and efficient.We hope that your decision on this matter will preserve the current
standard of requiring 20-year power purchase agreements for qualifying facilities under PURPA
so that Idahoans can continue to benefit from these technologies.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Kefer
Executive Director
Alliance for Industrial Efficiency
Citations:
l.DOE-ORNL,2008,ccCombined Heat and Power:Effective Energy Solutions for a Sustainable
Future,”Retrieved from:http://info.ornl.gov/sites/publicationslfiles/Pub13655.pdf
2.U.S.Department of Energy.,2015,“Combined Heat and Power Installation Database:Combined
Heat and Power Installations in Idaho”Retrieved from:
https :1/doe.icfwebservices .com/chpdb/state/ID
3.U.S.Environmental Protection Agency and U.S.Department of Energy,Combined Heat and
Power Partnership.2015,“Catalog of CHP Technologies.”Retrieved from:
http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/catalog_chptech_full.pdf
4.U.S.Department of Energy.,2015,“Combined Heat and Power Installation Database.”
Retrieved from:https :1/doe.icfwebservices .com/chpdb/
5.Weiss,J &Sarro,M.,2013,“The importance of long-term contracting for facilitating
renewable energy project development.”[White paper].Retrieved June 15,2815,from:
http ://www.brattle.com/system/publications/pdfs/000/004/927/original/The_Importance_of_Long-
Term_Contracting_for_Facilitating_Renewable_Energy_Project_Development_Weiss_Sarro_May_7_20l3
pdf?1380317003
6.Fox-Penner,P.S.,1990,“Cogeneration after PURPA:Energy conservation and industry
structure,”JL &Econ.33,517.
Unique Identifier:98.169.247.130
2
Jean Jewell
From:docfox@cableone.net
Sent:Thursday,June 25,2015 5:41 PM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:docfox@cableone.net
Subject:Case Comment Form:Edward Burton
Name:Edward Burton
Case Number:IPC-E-15-01
Email:docfox(cableone.net
Telephone:208-798-0956
Address:3213 8th St E
Lewiston ID,83501
Name of Utility Company:Avista
Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:Power suppliers must be permitted to enter into long-term contracts in order to be
able to finance major projects leading to a diversity of suppliers and a diversity of power
generation devices.For example,I could not begin to create a large land-base solar
generation facility,without being to show a bank that I have a source of income to repay the
necessary loan.The logic in that seems impeccable.
This is a public comment,as I do not in fact propose any such project.I did some years ago
work as an attorney for owners of/participants in the TAPS (Alyeska Pipeline)from Prudhoe
Bay to Valdez,which project would have been impossible without long-term prospects for
shippers of the product.Getting into solar power generation would have similar economic
needs.
Unique Identifier:184.155.237.180
1
Jean Jewell
From:nunyabiznus @ nunya.com
Sent:Friday,June 26,2015 7:25 AM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:nunyabiznus@nunya.com
Subject:Case Comment Form:Daniel Pfankuch
Name:Daniel Pfankuch
Case Number:
Email:nunyabiznus(nunya.com
Telephone:
Address:5170 Mountain View Dr.
Boise ID,83704
Name of Utility Company:Idaho Power
Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:Who are you trying to kid?It is all about the profit for Idaho Power.Get into
the 21st century.Alternative power needs to be embraced and utilized.It will eventually
put your company out of business,thank goodness,so start getting with the times and make
the changes to help people and this planet.
Unique Identifier:71.220.131.176
1