Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20120123Application.pdf~~~AI Zill!?"~ Pt'1¡ L: '"3'),_v . "l L 201 So MI au 23 s.LI CI, .Ut 84111 Jam 23, 2012 n4 OYEGH1 DELWY Jea D. JewllCoiss SeIda Pulie Utities Co 412 W. Wasn Bois ID 83702 :R: Ca No. PAC-E-12-0 In th Ma of th Applic ofRo Moun Powe fo App of Chto Net Peror Sta 3. De Ms Jewll: Ple 1i enlos for fiin an orgi an se copies ofRoclt Moun PoW's Applion in the abve-reer ma, inlud an atent to the Apliconcotaining a ma su th Cu Ou,.Netrk Perom Sta, an Cumer Peroran Sta. Al for condce an rega th Aplicaon shuld be ad to: Ted Wes Ro Mou Powe 201 So Ma Sui 2300 Sa La Cit, Ut 84 i 1 i Tel~: (801) 220-2963 Fix: (801) 220-279Em: te.weon(ifeotp.co Dael E. SolaRoc Mou Pow 201 So Ma Str Sui 2300 Sat La Cit, Uta 84111 Te1ep: (801).220-14 Fax: (101) 22329Eml: daeL.solandeifi.com Cocans re diver ma inlu da ie is to ROCkyMoui Powe, shd be ad to th followi: By E-ma (paied: By regu ma: daues~üicorp.com Da Re Re CenPac82' NE Mu St., Su 200 Poi, OR 972 Inor inuies may be di to Ted Wes Ida R. Ma at (801) 2229. Ida Pulic Uties Comisson Jan 23, 2012 Pag 2 Enlos iJ ORIGINAL Mark C. Moench Sr. VP and General Counsel 201 South Main, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 220-4459 FAX: (801) 220-3299 Email: mark.moench(£pacìficorp.com 'LÙi J ?'~ pot! l~" ':: i),_v í I 10 vt. Daniel E. Solander Senior Counsel 201 South Main, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 220-4014 FAX: (801) 220-3299 Email: daniel.solander(£pacìficorp.com Richard R. Hall, ISB No. 8080 STOEL RIVES LLP 101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Suite 1900 Boise, Idaho 83702-7705 Telephone No. (208)387-4211 Facsimile No. (208)389-9040 rrhall(£stoel.com A Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Power BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER FOR ) MODIFICATIONS TO THE SERVICE AND ) PERFORMANCE QUALITY REPORTING ) CASE NO. PAC-E-12-02 APPLICATION Comes now, PacìfiCorp, d//a Rocky Mountain Power and hereby applies to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission requesting authorization to modify the Company's existing Performance Standards program. In support of this Application, Rocky Mountain Power represents as follows: I. Background As par of Order No. 28213 approving the ScottishPower / PacifiCorp merger the Company agreed to implement Network Performance Standards, Service Performance Stadards and Customer Guarantees. The Company committed to a five-year term for the program and began offering the Customer Guarantees on Februar 29, 2000. Improvements to Network and Service performance stadards were initiated at approximately the same time. This program expired on March 31, 2005, but was extended voluntaily and later affirmed and fuher extended through December 31, 2011 in Order No. 29998 as par of the merger commitments of MidAmerican Energy Holding Company when acquiring PacìfiCorp. The purose behind the Service Performance Standards is to improve customer. service while emphasizing to employees that customer service and system reliabilty are a top priority. This focus on reliabìlty and individual transactions with customers has improved the Company's operations and been effective in setting priorities for employees as they conduct their daily work. These programs have been very effective and the Company has successfully implemented them as demonstrated by its semi-anual Service Standard Program reports. On June 4, 2008, PacìfiCorp fied an application requesting authorization to modify the Network Performance Standards. The application proposed that the basis for developing targets be modified in order to continue cost-effective improvements in system wide reliabilty and to maintain responsiveness in the event of outages. The Company proposed that improvement targets should be developed around outage events that are of a controllable natue on the distribution system, and therefore developed the category of "Controllable Distribution" outages. Controllable outage events are attributed to causes against which the Company is able to implement system improvements that have a high probabìlty of avoiding futue recurence at a local leveL. For example, outages that are related to equipment failure or animal intederence are controllable distribution outages since the Company can take measures to avoid them in the future and have some fairly high certainty these events will not recur. On the other hand, transmission outage events and car-hit-pole interference outage events do not conform to the definition of controllable distribution, and while important to avoid, are generally not avoidable via engineered programs. In Order No. 32432, the Final Order from the 2011 general rate case, PAC-E-11-12, the Commission ordered the Company to continue its service pedormance and quality reporting requirements including those associated with momentary and longer-term service interrptions occuring in the Idaho service territory. II. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS MEHC merger Commitment 45 states: "MEHC and PacìfiCorp commit to continue customer service guarantees and performance standards as established in each jurisdiction, provided that MEHC and PacifiCorp reserve the right to request modifications of the guarantees and standards after March 31,2008, and the right to request termination (as well as modification) of one or more guarantees or stadards after 2011. The guarantees and standards will not be eliminated or modified without Commission approvaL." Recognizing the value of the Customer Guaantee and Pedormance Standards programs and that the merger commitments would be completed by December 31, 2011, the Company initiated meetings on July 13 and December 14, 2011, with Commission staff to discuss the continuation of these two programs. At these meetings the Company recommended that these programs continue as par of the Company's regular business with no changes to the Customer Guarantees and re-establish the basis of the baseline performance targets to move back from controllable distribution outage events to underlying distribution outage events. Underlying distribution events include all outages excluding major events and prearanged (customer notice given and customer requested) outages. These events represent the overall outage customer experience, and while certin volatile controllable events may occur (such as a driver hitting a pole and causing a power outage), the Company is confident that the routine performance discussions that occur between the Commission Staff and the Company can properly identify when performance has been negatively impacted by such events. The Company also recommended that the Network Performance Stadards also remain with only one modification to Network Performance Standard 3. Curently Network Performance Stadard 3 states: "The Company will select a maximum of two under-performing circuits in Idaho on an anual basis and will undertake corrective measures to reduce the average circuit performance indicator (CPI) by 20% within five years. CPI includes all. outage events experienced by customers, including transmission and local transmission outage events, as well as events that meet the criteria of the IEEE major event definition discussed above." The Company is proposing that Network Performance Stadard 3 be modified to state: "The Company wil identify reliabilty areas of concern, the criteria or metric used for determining these areas, in addition to improvement plans to address them." The Company is proposing this modification in order to continue cost-effective improvements in system wide reliabilty and to maintain responsiveness in the event of outages. An attachment to this Application contains the Customer Guarantees, Customer Performance Stadards and Network Performance Standards updated with the proposed revision to Network Performance Standard 3. III. MODIFIED PROCEDURE Rocky Mountain Power believes that a hearing is not necessar to consider the issues presented herein and, therefore, respectfully requests that this Application be processed under Modified Procedure, i.e., by written submissions rather than by hearng. RP 201 et seq. If, however, the Commission determines that a technical hearing is required, the Company stands ready to present its testimony and support the Application in such hearng. IV. REQUEST FOR RELIEF Rocky Mountain Power respectfully requests that the Commission issue an Order: (1) authorizing that this matter may be processed by Modified Procedure; (2) acknowledging that MEHC met its merger commitment by successfully delivering the Customer Guarantees, Network Performance Standards, and Customer Performance Standards programs though December 31, 2011; and; (3) approving the proposed modification to Network Performance Standard 3. DATED: Januar 23, 2012.Æ:J / ¡l/( Richard R. Hall, ISH No. 8080 STOEL RIVES LLP 101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Suite 1900 Boise, Idaho 83702-7705 Telephone No. (208)387-4211 Facsimile No. (208)389-9040 rrhall(£stoel.com Mark C. Moench Sr. VP and General Counsel 201 South Main, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 220-4459 FAX: (801) 220-3299 Email: mark.moench(£pacificorp.com Daniel E. Solander Senior Counsel 201 South Main, Suite 2400 Salt Lake City UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 220-4014 FAX: (801) 220-3299 Email: daniel.solander(£pacificorp.com Attorneys for Rocky Mountain Power ~~MOAI Idaho Customer Guarantees Customer Guarantee 1:The Company wil restore supply after an Restoring Supply After an Outage outage within 24 hours of notification with cerain exceptions as descrbed in Rule 25. Customer Guarantee 2:The Company wil keep mutually agreed Appointments upon appointments which wil be scheduled within a two-hour time window. Customer Guarantee 3:The Company wil switch on power withn Switching on Power 24 hours of the customer or applicant's request, provided no constrction is required, all goverent inspections are met and communicated to the Company and required payments are made. Disconnections for nonpayment, subterge or theftdiversion of serice are excluded. Customer Guarantee 4:The Company wil provide an estimate for Estimates For New Supply new supply to the applicant or customer within 15 working days after the initial meeting and all necessar information is provided to the Company. Customer Guarantee 5:The Company wil respond to most biling Respond To Biling Inquiries inquiries at the time of the initial contact. For those that require further investigation, the Company wil investigate and respond to the Customer within 10 working days. Customer Guarantee 6:The Company wil investigate and respond Resolving Meter Problems to reported problems with a meter or conduct a meter test and report results to the customer within 10 working days. 'Customer Guarantee 7:The Company wil provide the customer Notification of Planed Interptions with at least two days notice prior to tuing off power for planed interptions. ~~MOAI Idaho Penormance Standards Network Performance Standard 1:The Company wil report Controllable, Maintain System Average Interption Total and Underlying SAIDI for each Duration Index (SAIDI)reporting period, as well as identify baseline underlying performance targets for the perod. For actual perormance varations from underlying baseline, explanations of perormance wil be provided. Network Performance Standard 2:The Company wil report Controllable, Improve System Average Interrption Total and Underlying SAIFI for each Frequency Index (SAIFI)reporting period, as well as identify underlying baseline performance targets for the period. For actual underlying perormance varations from baseline, explanations of perormance wil be provided. Network Performance Standard 3:The Company wil identify reliability areas Identify Areas of Reliabìlty Concer of concern, the critera or metrc used for deterining these areas, in addition to improvement plans to address them. Network Performance Standard 4:The Company wil restore power outages Supply Restoration due to loss of supply or damage to the distrbution system within thee hours to 80% of customers on average. Customer Serce Perormance Standard The Company wil answer 80% of ~: Telephone Serice Level telephone calls within 30 seconds. The Company wil monitor customer satisfaction with the Company's Customer Serice Associates and quality of response received by customers through the Company's eQuality monitoring system. Customer Serice Perormance Standard The Company wil a) respond to at least Q:95% of non-disconnect Commission Commission Complaint Response /complaints within thee working days and Resolution wil b) respond to at least 95% of disconnect Commission complaints within four working hours, and wil c) resolve 95% of informal Commission complaints within 30 days.