20110610Comment.pdf

Jean Jewell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
tshurt~idahosupreme.com
Friday, June 10, 2011 9:44 AM
Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness
PUC Comment Form
A Comment from Timothy Shurtz follows:
-- - --- ---- - -- - - --- - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - --
Case Number: PAC-E-11-12
Name: Timothy Shurtz
Address: 411 south main
City: Firth
State: Idaho
Zip: 83236
Daytime Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: tshurtz~idahosupreme. com Name of Utility Company: Rocky Mountain power
Acknowledge: acknowledge
Please describe your comment briefly:
Honorible Commissioners once agian you have to rule on another rate case for Rocky Mountain
Power I would ask that you postpone moving on this latest Rocky Mountian rate case until the
issues still pending in the State Supreme court Concerning the last rate case are
resol ved. Further more I feel as I testified in the last rate case that their should be time
betweeen rate cases to allow rate payers to adjust their budgets to any new rates that may be
imposed on them. I also feel that as long as Rocky Mountain thinks that they can get some
gain out of these yearly rate cases they keep filing rate cases every year. To me it is like
going to a well and drawing a bucket of water if you draw only a half bucket of water you
will just keep drawing water from the well util you draw all that you want. But in this case
it seems that you can not quench Rocky Mountain i s thirst for every Last dollar they can take
from us rate payers. All that I ask from the commission is to look at this latest rate case
with this in mind that as long as Rocky Mountain thinks they can get half of what they want
in every rate case they will always be coming back to the well for more. Thank You and your
Staff for your service to me Tim Shurtz
The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov /forms/ipuc1/ipuc. html
¡P address is 69.92.84.2
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1