20101014Hessing Di.pdf

BEFORE THE arc,... 'T''~,"'- ¡- ~ ¡ "! ;--, ,. 1¡.._ _ ~ - ii: -~"",,,:'.J
20m OCT 14 PH r: 31;
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISS~\~C¡
UTlUl¡ES
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
PACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN ) CASE NO. PAC-E-10-07
POWER FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGES )
TO ITS ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULES )
)
)
)
)
)
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KEITH HESSING
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
OCTOBER 14, 2010
1
2 the record.
Q.Please state your name and business address for
3 A.My name is Keith D. Hessing and my business
4 address is 472 West Washington Street, Boise, Idaho.
5
6
By whom are you employed and in what capacity?Q.
A.I am employed by the Idaho Public Utilities
7 Commission as a Public Utilities Engineer.
8 What is your education and experienceQ.
9 background?
10 A.I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the
11 State of Idaho. I received a Bachelor of Science Degree
12 in Civil Engineering from the University of Idaho in 1974.
13 Since then, I worked six years for the Idaho Department of
14 Water Resources, and two years for Morrison-Knudsen. I
15 have been continuously employed at the Commission since
16 August 1983.
17 As a member of the Commission Staff, my primary
18 areas of responsibility have been electric utility power
19 supply, cost of service, revenue allocation and rate
20 design.
21 Q.What is the purpose of your testimony in this
22 proceeding?
23 My testimony addresses customer class cost ofA.
24 service and the allocation of the Staff proposed revenue
25 requirement to the various customer classes.
CASE NO. PAC-E-10-0710/14/10 HESSING, K. (Di) 1
STAFF
2
1 COST OF SERVICE
3 in this case?
Q.What cost of service methodology do you support
4 A.I support the methodology presented by the
5 Company's witness Craig Paice. The basic methodology is
6 the same used in the Revised Protocol jurisdictional
7 allocation process. The jurisdictional allocation
8 methodology was developed in collaboration with the other
9 state jurisdictions in which PacifiCorp provides service.
10 The cost of service methodology presented by the Company
11 is the same methodology accepted by the Commission in
12 recent general rate case decisions.
13 Are there advantages to not changing the Cost ofQ.
14 Service methodology?
15 Yes. Aside from the fact that it simplifies theA.
16 case, it allows the Cost of Service results to be driven
17 by class energy, demand and customer characteristics and
18 changes in Company costs. When the methodology is
19 changed, cost of service results for customer classes may
20 change significantly without any change in customer usage
21 characteristics or underlying service costs.
22
23
Q.What cost of service results do you propose?
A.Staff Exhibit No. 129 contains my cost of
24 service results. These results are based on a Staff
25 revenue requirement increase of approximately $14.8
CASE NO. PAC-E-10-0710/14/10 HESSING, K. (Di) 2
STAFF
1 million and are calculated using the same model and
2 methodology proposed by the Company.
3 REVENU SPRE
4 Q.Wha tis revenue spread?
5 A.Revenue spread is the determination of the
6 revenue amount that needs to be collected from each
7 customer class. It is driven by a class cost of service
8 result.
9 Q.What revenue spread does the Company propose?
10 A.The Company proposes to move all customer
11 classes to nearly full cost of service except the Street
12 and Area Lighting class (Schedules 7, 11, 12) that would
13 receive a rate reduction in a full cost of service move.
14 The Company proposes no change in the lighting revenue
15 requirement and to re-spread the lighting decrease, that
16 would otherwise occur, to all other customer classes to
17 achieve the recovery of the full revenue requirement.
18 Therefore, the final move is to nearly full cost of
19 service for all classes receiving an increase.
20 Q.What is your revenue spread proposal?
21 A.I propose to use the same methodology presented
22 by the Company with one difference. My proposal is to
23 allow no class revenue requirement decreases while moving
24 customer classes requiring increases toward full cost of
25 service with uniform percentage offsets to balance the
CASE NO. PAC-E-10-0710/14/10 HESSING, K. (Di) 3
STAFF
1 revenue requirement for the lighting class reduction not
2 given. The difference between my proposal and the
3 Company's proposal is that I would assign Residential
4 customers taking service under Schedules 1 and 36 equal
5 percentage increases. Staff witness Bryan Lanspery
6 provides testimony in support of this position.
7 As shown on Staff Exhibit No. 129, only the
8 Street and Area Lighting class (Schedules 7, 11, 12) would
9 recei ve a decrease in a full cost of service move. That
10 decrease amounts to $173,064. Staff Exhibit No. 130 shows
11 the revenue spread that I propose. Column H shows the
12 spread of the proposed increase and Column I shows the
13 resulting percentage increase for each class. This is the
14 rate spread presented to Staff witness Bryan Lanspery for
15 use in rate design calculations.
16 Q.Did you prepare any other revenue spreads for
17 this case?
18 A.Yes. It is fairly common practice to move only
19 part way to full cost of service to mitigate the shock of
20 large increases. The trade-off is that a partial move to
21 cost of service is an acceptance that some classes will
22 subsidize others. Staff Exhibit No. 131 shows a revenue
23 spread that moves half way to full cost of service while
24 giving no decreases and levelizing the increase to the two
25 residential classes.
CASE NO. PAC-E-10-0710/14/10 HESSING, K. (Di) 4
STAFF
1
2
Q.Do you recommend this rate spread?
A.No. I recommend the rate spread shown on Staff
3 Exhibit No. 130. I provide the alternative simply to
4 demonstrate the results of such a revenue spread on the
5 various customer classes.
6 Q.Does this conclude your direct testimony in this
7 proceeding?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Yes, it does.A.
CASE NO. PAC-E-10-0710/14/10 HESSING, K. (Di) 5
STAFF
IP
U
C

S
t
a
f
f

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Fo
r

R
o
c
k
y

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

P
o
w
e
r
Co
s
t

O
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

B
y

R
a
t
e

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
12

M
o
n
t
h
s

E
n
d
i
n
g

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0
MS
P

P
r
o
t
o
c
o
l
8.
0
2
%

=

T
a
r
g
e
t

R
e
t
u
r
n

o
n

R
a
t
e

B
a
s
e
A
B
C
o
E
F
G
H
J
K
L
M
Re
t
u
r
n

o
n
Ra
t
e

o
f
To
t
a
l
Ge
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Re
t
a
i
l
Mi
s
c
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Li
n
e
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
An
n
u
a
l
Ra
t
e
Re
t
u
r
n
Co
s
t

of

Co
s
t

of
Co
s
t

of

Co
s
t

o
f
Co
s
t

of

Co
s
t

o
f
(D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
)
Ch
a
n
g
e

fr
o
m

No
.
No
.
Re
v
e
n
u
e
Ba
s
e
In
d
e
x
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
to

=

R
O
R
Cu
r
r
e
n
t

R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
1
01
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
39
,
0
9
5
,
1
5
8
8.
1
1
%
1.2
1
40
,
0
2
5
,
4
3
1
21
,
3
1
4
,
9
4
1
2,
8
2
2
,
6
6
2
11
,
6
4
3
,
9
9
9
4,0
7
3
,
2
4
5
17
0
,
5
8
4
93
0
,
2
7
3
2.
3
8
%
2
36
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

-

T
O
O
20
,
6
2
4
,
2
8
9
6.
1
1
%
0.9
1
22
,
5
9
8
,
4
9
5
13
,
7
9
7
,
7
3
3
1,
8
0
1
,
1
0
4
5,
4
3
0
,
1
6
9
1,
4
9
0
,
6
9
1
78
,
7
9
8
1,
9
7
4
,
2
0
6
9.
5
7
%
3
06
,
3
5
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

-

L
a
r
g
e
20
,
0
7
5
,
6
7
0
6.
6
4
%
0.9
9
21
,
6
7
6
,
9
2
1
16
,
0
4
4
,
7
7
8
2,
1
3
5
,
6
9
8
3,
3
0
0
,
2
0
4
13
9
,
1
9
6
57
,
0
4
6
1,
6
0
1
,
2
5
1
7.
9
8
%
5
09
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c

-

H
i
g
h

V
o
l
t
a
g
e
5,
0
6
2
,
4
8
2
6.
4
8
%
0.
9
7
5,
4
6
6
,
9
0
0
4,
8
3
4
,
0
6
8
59
1
,
6
4
5
17
,
4
3
3
10
,
0
0
2
13
,
7
5
2
40
4
,
4
1
8
7.
9
9
%
6
10
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
39
,
8
4
5
,
7
3
7
7.
9
0
%
1.
1
8
41
,
0
9
9
,
3
6
2
25
,
4
6
9
,
8
2
9
3,
1
8
1
,
1
5
2
12
,
1
6
4
,
2
2
1
16
7
,
8
6
9
11
6
,
2
9
1
1,
2
5
3
,
6
2
5
3.
1
5
%
7
07
,
1
1
,
1
2
St
r
e
e
t

&

A
r
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
60
0
,
5
2
1
42
.
1
9
%
6.
3
1
42
7
,
4
5
7
98
,
5
6
5
7,
6
2
4
27
5
,
2
9
4
43
,
2
7
4
2,
7
0
0
(1
7
3
,
0
6
4
)
-2
8
.
8
2
%
8
19
Sp
a
c
e

H
e
a
t
i
n
g
53
4
,
2
1
9
7.
2
8
%
1.
0
9
56
4
,
1
5
1
39
8
,
3
2
8
54
,
2
5
2
98
,
8
4
7
11
,
0
4
8
1,
6
7
6
29
,
9
3
2
5.
6
0
%
9
23
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

-

S
m
a
l
l
12
,
3
0
9
,
6
0
9
7.
4
6
%
1.
1
2
12
,
9
0
3
,
3
6
6
7,
9
0
7
,
5
2
8
1,
0
7
8
,
3
9
1
3,
0
9
4
,
3
0
5
77
6
,
8
1
4
46
,
3
2
8
59
3
,
7
5
7
4.
8
2
%
10
SP
C
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t

1
59
,
5
2
4
,
4
9
7
5.
0
3
%
0.
7
5
67
,
2
7
7
,
7
2
2
59
,
6
3
7
,
4
9
4
7,3
7
8
,
8
4
0
10
3
,
2
9
4
(2
,
3
7
8
)
16
0
,
4
7
3
7,
7
5
3
,
2
2
5
13
.
0
3
%
11
SP
C
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t

2
4,
4
6
6
,
4
3
2
5.
8
6
%
0.
8
8
4,
8
9
8
,
1
7
7
4,2
7
5
,
7
2
3
50
5
,
2
3
1
10
4
,
7
4
8
42
6
12
,
0
4
9
43
1
,
7
4
5
9.6
7
%
12
To
t
a
l
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
20
2
,
1
3
8
,
6
1
4
6.
6
8
%
1.
0
0
21
6
,
9
3
7
,
9
8
2
15
3
,
7
7
8
,
9
8
7
19
,
5
5
6
,
5
9
9
36
,
2
3
2
,
5
1
3
6,
7
1
0
,
1
8
8
65
9
,
6
9
6
14
,
7
9
9
,
3
6
8
7.
3
2
%
Fo
o
t
n
o
t
e
s
:
Co
l
u
m
n

C
:

A
n
n
u
a
l

r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

1
2

m
o
n
t
h
s

e
n
d
i
n
g

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0
.
Co
l
u
m
n

0
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

R
e
t
u
r
n

o
n

R
a
t
e
b
a
s
e

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

S
t
u
d
y
Co
l
u
m
n

E
:

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

I
n
d
e
x
.

R
a
t
e

o
f

r
e
t
u
r
n

b
y

r
a
t
e

s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
,

d
i
v
i
d
e
d

b
y

I
d
a
h
o

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
'
s

n
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
d

r
a
t
e

o
f

r
e
t
u
r
n
.
Co
l
u
m
n

F
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

F
u
l
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
Co
l
u
m
n

G
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
.
Co
l
u
m
n

H
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
.
Co
l
u
m
n

I

:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
.
Co
l
u
m
n

J
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

R
e
t
a
i
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
.
Co
l
u
m
n

K
:

C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d

M
i
s
c
.
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

a
t

J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
a
t
e

o
f

R
e
t
u
r
n

p
e
r

D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
0

E
m
b
e
d
d
e
d

C
O
S

S
t
u
d
y
.
Co
l
u
m
n

L
:

I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

o
r

D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

t
o

M
o
v
e

F
r
o
m

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
v
e
n
u
e

t
o

F
u
l
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

D
o
l
l
a
r
s
.
Co
i
u
m
n

M
:

I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e

o
r

D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

t
o

M
o
v
e

F
r
o
m

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
v
e
n
u
e

t
o

F
u
l
l

C
o
s
t

o
f

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

P
e
r
c
e
n
t
.
-
~

(
'

t
T
!
o.

I
l
;
"
,
--

v
:
:
:
!
,;
:
:

(
j

_
.
,
..

(
j

0
'
~C
I

Z

_
.
!
o
S
'

~

Z
'
(J

0
-

0
~~
:
.
,
..

(
'

N
II

i

'
0
::

t
r

,
-oio..
CA
S
E

N
O
.

P
A
C
-
E
-
1
0
-
0
7
IP
U
C

S
T
A
F
F

P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L

(
A
D
J
U
S
T
E
D

F
U
L
L

M
O
V
E

T
O

C
O
S
T

O
F

S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D

I
M
P
A
C
T

O
F

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S

O
N

F
O
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
R
E
S
E
N
T

R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
FR
O
M

E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C

S
A
L
E
S

T
O

U
L
T
I
M
A
T
E

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
S
DI
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
E
D

B
Y

R
A
T
E

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S

I
N

I
D
A
H
O
12

M
O
N
T
H
S

E
N
D
I
N
G

D
E
C
E
M
B
E
R

2
0
1
0
(A
)
(B
)
(C
)
(D
)
(E
)
(F
)
(G
)
(H
)
(I
)
(1
)
(K
)
Li
n
e
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e

(
$
0
0
0
)
Av
g
.

R
a
t
e

(
r
/
k
W
h
)
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Sc
h
.
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
MW
H
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ch
a
n
g
e
%
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
(1
)
(2
)
(3
)
(4
)
(5
)
(6
)
(7
)
(8
)
(9
)
(1
0
)
(6
)
-
(
5
)
(7
)
1
(
5
)
(5
)
/
(
4
)
(6
)
/
(
4
)
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
a
l
e
s
1
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
42
,
5
0
6
42
7
,
9
0
7
$3
9
,
0
0
5
$4
0
,
8
7
2
$1
,
8
6
7
4.
8
%
9.
1
2
9.
5
5
2
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l

T
O
D
36
15
,
0
5
0
28
0
,
4
0
7
$2
0
,
6
2
4
$2
1
,
6
1

i
$9
8
7
4.
8
%
7.
3
6
7.
7
1
3
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
--
--
0
$4
$4
$0
0.
0
%
4
To
t
a
l

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
57
,
5
5
6
70
8
,
3
1
4
$5
9
,
6
3
3
$6
2
,
4
8
7
$2
,
8
5
3
4.
8
%
8.
4
2
8.
8
2
5
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

&

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
6
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
i
c
e

-

L
a
r
g
e

P
o
w
e
r
6
1,
0
5
9
28
0
,
4
9
7
$1
7
,
6
5
9
$1
9
,
0
5
2
$1
,
3
9
4
7.
9
%
6.
3
0
6.
7
9
7
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
v
c
.

-

L
g
.

P
o
w
e
r

(
R
&
F
)
6A
24
3
33
,
0
0
1
$2
,
3
2
5
$2
,
5
0
8
$1
8
3
7.
9
%
7.
0
4
7.
6
0
8
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
-
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

6
1,
3
0
2
31
3
,
4
9
8
$1
9
,
9
8
3
$2
1
,
5
6
0
$1
,
5
7
7
7.
9
%
6.
3
7
6.
8
8
9
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

-

H
i
g
h

V
o
l
t
a
g
e
9
12
10
6
,
4
8
6
$5
,
0
6
2
$5
,
4
6
3
$4
0
0
7.
9
%
4.
7
5
5.
1
3
10
Ir
r
g
a
t
i
o
n
10
4,
8
1
0
54
5
,
2
9
0
$3
9
,
8
4
6
$4
1
,
0
6
5
$1
,
2
1
9
3.
1
%
7.
3
1
7.
5
3
11
Co
m
m
.

&

I
n
d
.

S
p
a
c
e

H
e
a
t
i
n
g
19
13
5
7,
7
6
9
$5
3
4
$5
6
4
$2
9
5.
5
%
6.
8
8
7.
2
6
12
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
i
c
e
23
6,
6
9
2
13
4
,
2
9
4
$1
0
,
7
3
1
$1
1
,
2
4
1
$5
1
1
4.
8
%
7.
9
9
8.
3
7
13
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

(
R
&
F
)
23
A
1,
4
9
4
18
,
9
0
7
$1
,
5
7
9
$1
,
6
5
2
$7
3
4.
6
%
8.
3
5
8.
7
4
14
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
-
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

2
3
8,
1
8
6
15
3
,
2
0
1
12
,
3
1
0
12
,
8
9
3
58
3
4.
7
%
8.
0
3
8.
4
2
15
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l

T
O
D
35
3
1,
8
8
3
$9
2
$1
0
0
$7
7.
9
%
4.
9
0
5.
2
9
16
Sp
e
c
i
a
l

C
o
n
t
r
c
t

i
1
1,
3
8
5
,
1
7
3
$5
9
,
5
2
4
$6
7
,
2
3
1
$7
,
7
0
6
12
.
9
%
4.
3
0
4.
8
5
17
Sp
e
c
i
a
l

C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t

2
1
10
1
,
4
5
0
$4
,
4
6
6
$4
,
8
9
4
$4
2
8
9.
6
%
4.
4
0
4.
8
2
18
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
--
--
0
$6
8
1
$6
8
1
$0
0.
0
%
19
To
t
a
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

&

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
14
,
4
5
1
2,
6
1
4
,
7
5
0
$1
4
2
,
4
9
9
$1
5
4
,
4
5
0
$1
1
,
9
5
0
8.
4
%
5.
4
5
5.
9
1
20
Pu
b
l
i
c

S
t
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
g
21
Se
c
u
r
i
t
y

A
r
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
7
20
4
26
4
$9
7
$9
7
$0
0.
0
%
36
.
8
1
36
.
8
1
õ~
Q
~
.
22
Se
c
u
r
t
y

A
r
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
g

(
R
&
F
)
7A
15
3
13
1
$5
2
$5
2
$0
0.
0
%
39
.
6
2
39
.
6
2
--

t
i
23
St
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
g

-

C
o
m
p
a
n
y
11
30
10
1
$4
4
$4
4
$0
0.
0
%
43
.
8
7
43
.
8
7
¡:

:
i

t
1

_
.
~~

Z
g
:
,
24
St
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
g

-

C
u
s
t
m
e
r
12
32
3
2,
3
1
3
$4
0
7
$4
0
7
$0
0.
0
%
17
.
6
0
17
.
6
0
oS
'
!
'

Z
'
25
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
--
--
0
$0
$0
$0
(J

"
"

0
26
To
t
a
l

P
u
b
l
i
c

S
t
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
71
0
2,
8
0
9
$6
0
1
$6
0
1
$0
.
)
-
'

,
0.
0
%
21
.
8
21
.
8
~
(
)

W
i:

i

0
27
To
t
a
l

S
a
l
e
s

t
o

U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
72
,
7
1
7
3,
3
2
5
,
8
7
3
$2
0
2
,
7
3
3
$2
1
7
,
5
3
7
$1
4
,
8
0
4
7.
3
%
6.
1
0
6.
5
4
::

t
;
-0I0-.
CA
S
E

N
O
.

P
A
C
-
E
-
1
0
-
0
7
IP
U
C

S
T
A
F
F

(
A
D
J
U
S
T
E
D

5
0
%

M
O
V
E

T
O

C
O
S
T

O
F

S
E
R
V
I
C
E
)
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D

I
M
P
A
C
T

O
F

P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D

R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S

O
N

F
O
R
E
C
A
S
T

P
R
E
S
E
N
T

R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
FR
O
M

E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C

S
A
L
E
S

T
O

U
L
T
I
M
A
T
E

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
S
DI
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
E
D

B
Y

R
A
T
E

S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S

I
N

I
D
A
H
O
12

M
O
N
T
H
S

E
N
D
I
N
G

D
E
C
E
M
B
E
R

2
0
1
0
(A
)
(B
)
(C
)
(D
)
(E
)
(F
)
(G
)
(H
)
(I
)
(J
)
(K
)
Li
n
e
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Re
v
e
n
u
e

(
$
0
0
0
)
Av
g
.

R
a
t
e

(
t
'
/
k
W
h
)
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Sc
h
.
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
MW
H
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ch
a
n
g
e
%
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
(I
)
(2
)
(3
)
(4
)
(5
)
(6
)
(7
)
(8
)
(9
)
(1
0
)
(6
)
-
(
5
)
(7
)
1
(
5
)
(5
)
/
(
4
)
(6
)
/
(
4
)
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
a
l
e
s
I
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
I
42
,
5
0
6
42
7
,
9
0
7
$3
9
,
0
0
5
$4
0
,
8
7
2
2,3
3
6
6.
0
%
9.
1
2
9.
5
5
2
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l

T
O
O
36
15
,
0
5
0
28
0
,
4
0
7
$2
0
,
6
2
4
$2
1
,
8
6
0
1,
2
3
5
6.
0
%
7.
3
6
7.
8
0
3
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
.-
--
0
$4
$4
$0
0.
0
%
4
To
t
a
l

R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
--
5
5
6
70
8
,
3
1
4
$5
9
,
6
3
3
$6
2
,
7
3
5
$3
,
5
7
2
6.
0
%
8.
4
2
8.
8
6
5
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

&

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
6
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

-

L
a
r
g
e

P
o
w
e
r
6
1,
0
5
9
28
0
,
4
9
7
$1
7
,
6
5
9
$1
9
,
0
4
7
1,
3
8
9
7.
9
%
6.
3
0
6.
7
9
7
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
v
c
.

-

L
g
.

P
o
w
e
r

(
R
&
F
)
6A
24
3
33
,
0
0
1
$2
,
3
2
5
$2
,
5
0
8
18
3
7.
9
%
7.
0
4
7.
6
0
8
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
-
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

6
1,
3
0
2
31
3
,
4
9
8
$1
9
,
9
8
3
$2
1
,
5
5
5
$1
,
5
7
2
7.
9
%
6.
3
7
6.
8
8
9
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

-

H
i
g
h

V
o
l
t
a
g
e
9
12
10
6
,
4
8
6
$5
,
0
6
2
$5
,
4
4
8
38
5
7.
6
%
4.
7
5
5.1
2
10
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
10
4,8
1
0
54
5
,
2
9
0
$3
9
,
8
4
6
$4
1
,
8
8
9
2,
0
4
3
5.1
%
7.
3
1
7.
6
8
11
Co
m
m
.

&

I
n
d
.

S
p
a
c
e

H
e
a
t
i
n
g
19
13
5
7,
7
6
9
$5
3
4
$5
7
0
35
6.6
%
6.
8
8
7.
3
3
12
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
23
6,
6
9
2
13
4
,
2
9
4
$1
0
,
7
3

i
$1
1
,
3
9
0
65
9
6.1
%
7.
9
9
8.
4
8
13
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

(
R
&
F
)
23
A
1,4
9
4
18
,
9
0
7
$1
,
5
7
9
$1
,
6
7
6
97
6.1
%
8.3
5
8.
8
6
14
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
-
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

2
3
8,
1
8
6
15
3
,
2
0
1
12
,
3
1
0
13
,
0
6
6
75
6
6.1
%
8.
0
3
8.
5
3
15
Ge
n
e
r
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l

T
O
O
35
3
1,
8
8
3
$9
2
$1
0
0
7
7.
9
%
4.
9
0
5.
2
9
16
Sp
e
c
i
a
l

C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t

I
1
1,
3
8
5
,
1
7
3
$5
9
,
5
2
4
$6
5
,
5
7
7
6,
0
5
3
10
.
2
%
4.
3
0
4.
7
3
17
Sp
e
c
i
a
l

C
o
n
t
r
c
t

2
I
10
1
,
4
5
0
$4
,
4
6
6
$4
,
8
3
7
37
0
8.
3
%
4.
4
0
4.
7
7
18
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
--
--
0
$6
8
1
$6
8
1
$0
0.
0
%
19
To
t
a
l

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l

&

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
14
,
4
5
1
2,
6
1
4
,
7
5
0
$1
4
2
,
4
9
9
$1
5
3
,
7
2
2
$1
1
,
2
2
2
7.
9
%
5.
4
5
5.
8
8
20
Pu
b
l
i
c

S
t
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
21
Se
c
u
r
t
y

A
r
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
7
20
4
26
4
$9
7
$9
7
$0
0.
0
%
36
.
8
1
36
.
8
1
22
Se
c
u
r
i
t
y

A
r
e
a

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

(
R
&
F
)
7A
15
3
13
1
$5
2
$5
2
$0
0.
0
%
39
.
6
2
39
.
6
2
..

~

(
)

t
'
23
St
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

-

C
o
m
p
a
n
y
11
30
10
1
$4
4
$4
4
$0
0.
0
%
43
.
8
7
43
.
8
7
o.

I
l
;
'
-.

e
n
:
:
24
St
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g

-

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
12
32
3
2,
3
1
3
$4
0
7
$4
0
7
$0
0.
0
%
17
.
6
0
17
.
6
0
¡:

:
i

(
D

_
.
;:

i
;

Z

8
:
25
AG
A
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
--
--
0
$0
$0
$0
o
Š
'
?

Z
26
To
t
a
l

P
u
b
l
i
c

S
t
r
e
e
t

L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
71
0
2,
8
0
9
$6
0
1
$6
0
1
$0
0.
0
%
21
.
3
8
21
.
8
(J

"
1

0
';

)
-

:
.
S
n
w
.
27
To
t
a
l

S
a
l
e
s

t
o

U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
72
,
7
1
7
3,
3
2
5
,
8
7
3
$2
0
2
,
7
3
3
$2
1
7
,
0
5
7
$1
4
,
7
9
4
7.
3
%
6.
1
0
6.5
3
!"

t
'

.
.
'-

i
..0I0-.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2010,
SERVED THE FOREGOING DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KEITH HESSING, IN CASE
NO. PAC-E-1O-07, BY MAILING A COPY THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE
FOLLOWING:
TED WESTON
ID REGULATORY AFFAIRS MANAGER
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
201 S MAIN ST STE 2300
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: ted.weston(fpacificorp.com
E-MAIL: ONLY
MARK C MOENCH
DANIEL E SOLANDER
ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
E-MAIL: mark.moench(fpacificorp.com
daniel.solander(fpacificorp .com
RANDALL C BUDGE
RACINE OLSON NYE ET AL
PO BOX 1391
POCATELLO ID 83204-1391
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: rcb(fracinelaw.net
E-MAIL: ONLY
JAMES R SMITH
MONSANTO COMPANY
E-MAIL: jim.r.smith(fmonsanto.com
ANTHONY Y ANKEL
29814 LAKE ROAD
BAY VILLAGE OH 44140
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: tony(fyanel.net
PAUL J HICKEY
HICKEY & EVANS LLP
1800 CAREY AVE., SUITE 700
PO BOX 467
CHEYENNE WY 82003
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: phickey(fhickeyevans.com
E-MAIL: ONLY
KATIE IVERSON
BRUBAKER & ASSOCIATES
E-MAIL: kiverson(fconsultbai.com
ERIC L OLSEN
RACINE OLSON NYE ET AL
PO BOX 1391
POCATELLO ID 83204-1391
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: elo(fracinelaw.net
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TIM BULLER
JASON HARRS
AGRIUMINC
3010 CONDA RD
SODA SPRINGS ID 83276
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: tbullertiagrium.com
jaharristiagri ur.com
BENJAMIN J OTTO
IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE
710 N 6TH STREET
POBOX 844
BOISE ID 83702
(HAND CARRIED)
E-MAIL: bottotiidahoconservation.org
E-MAIL: ONLY
DR. DON READING
E-MAIL: dreadingtimindspring.com
MELINDA J DA VISON
DAVISON VAN CLEVE, P.C.
333 SW TAYLOR, SUITE 400
PORTLAND, OR 97204
(FED EX)
E-MAIL: mjdtidvclaw.com
RONALD L WILLIAMS
WILLIAMS BRADBURY, P.C.
1015 W HAYS STREET
BOISE ID 83702
(HAND CARRIED)
E-MAIL: rontiwillamsbradbury.com
BRAD M PURDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2019N 17TH STREET
BOISE ID 83702
(HAND CARRIED)
E-MAIL: bmpurdytihotmail.com
,.~
SECRETARY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE