20090225Weston re Stipulation.pdf

~~l~OUNTA'N
°E~Eiui::¡\ t; .' \" i
2009 fEB 25 AM 10: 06 201 South Main, Suite 2300
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Februar 25,2009
VI OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell
Commssion Secreta
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington
Boise,ID 83702
Attention: Jean D. Jewell
Commission Secreta
RE: Case No. PAC-E-08-07 In the Matter of the Application of Rocky Mountain Power for
Approval of Changes to its Electric Service Schedules and a Price Increase of $5.9
Milion, or 4.0%.
Enclosed please find the original and nine (9) copies of the testimony and exhbits of J. Ted
Weston in support of the Stipulation entered into by and between Rocky Mountain Power and
the following paries of record in the above captioned matter: Sta for the Idaho Public Utilities
Commssion, Idaho Irrgation Pumpers Association, Inc. and the Communty Action Parership
Association of Idaho. Also enclosed is a CD containing the electronic copies of the testimony
and exhbits.
Please let me know if you have any fuher questions.
~f!~/~
Jeffey K. Larsen
Vice President, Reguation
Rocky Mountain Power
Enclosures
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 25th day of Febru, 2009, I caused to be served, via E-mail,
a tre and correct copy of Rocky Mountain Power's Stipulation Testimony in PAC-E-08-
07 to the following:
Eric L. Olsen
Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge & Bailey
201 E. Center
Pocatello,ID 83204-1391
elorgracinelaw.net
Anthony Yanel
Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge & Bailey
29814 Lake Road
Bay Vilage, OR 44140
rcbrgracine1aw.net
Scott Woodbur
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilties Commssion
472 W. Washington
Boise, ID 83720
Scott. woodburrgpuc.idaho.gov
Radall C. Budge
Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge & Bailey
201 E. Center
Pocatello,ID 83204-1391
rcbrgracinelaw.net
Katie Iverson
Brubaker & Associates
17244 W. Cordova Cour
Surrise, AZ 85276
kiversonrgconsultbai.com
James R. Smith
Monsanto Company
P.O. Box 816
Pocatello, ID 83204-1391
elorgracine1aw.net
Brad M. Purdy
Attorney at Law
2019 N. 17th Street
Boise, ID 83702
bmpurdyrghotmail.com
Conley E. Ward
Michael C. Creamer
Givens Pursley LLP
601 W. Banock St.
Boise, ID 83701
cewrggivenspursley.com
Denns E. Peseau
Utility Resources, Inc.
1500 Libert St. SE, Suite 250
Salem, OR 97302
dpeseaurgexcite.com
\f\~~
Arel Son v
Coordinator, Regulatory Admnistrative
i:r,r-r:l\fr.:r',l "1'_ vi:'; t' 1..., t)
20fl9 fEB 25 AM fO: 06
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMSSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE )
APPLICATION OF ROCKY )
MOUNAIN POWER FOR )
APPROVAL OF CHAGES TO ITS )
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULES )
AN A PRICE INCREASE OF $5.9 )
MILLION, OR 4.0 PERCENT )
CASE NO. PAC-E-08-07
Stipulation Testimony of
J. Ted Weston
ROCKY MOUNTAI POWER
CASE NO. PAC-E-08-07
February 2009
1 Q.
2
3 A.
Please state your name, business address and present position with Rocky
Mountain Power (the "Company"), a division ofPacifiCorp.
My name is J. Ted Weston and my business address is 201 South Mai, Suite
4 2300, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111. I am curently employed as the Manager of
5 Idaho Reguatory Affairs for the Company.
6 Qualifications
7 Q.
8 A.
9
10
11
12
13 Q.
14 A.
15
16
17
18 Q.
19 A.
20
Briefly describe your educational and professional background.
I received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from Uta State
University in 1983. I joined the Company in June of 1983 and I have held varous
accounting and regulatory positions prior to my curent position. In addition to
formal education, I have attended varous educational, professional and electrc
industry related seminars durng my career with the Company.
What are your responsibilties as Manager of Regulatory AtTairs?
My primar responsibilties include the coordination and management of Idaho
reguatory filings, communcations with the commssion and staff, and oversight
of reporting requiements for the Company with the Idaho Public Utilties
Commission.
Have you testifed in previous regulatory proceedings?
Yes. I have testified before the Washigton Transporttion and Utilities
Commssion and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
21 Purpose of Testimony
22 Q.
23 A.
What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
The purose of my testimony is to present and support the Stipulation in the
Weston, Stip - 1
Rocky Mountain Power
1 Company's 2008 general rate case entered into by and among Rocky Mountain
2 Power, a division ofPacifiCorp ("Rocky Mountain Power" or the "Company");
3 Staff for the Idaho Public Utilities Commssion ("Staf'); the Idaho Irgation
4 Pumpers Association, Inc. ("LIP A"); and the Community Action Parnership
5 Association of Idaho ("CAP AI"), collectively referred to in my testimony as the
6 Paries. I will provide an overview ofthe Company's 2008 Idaho rate case and an
7 explanation of the terms and conditions of this Stipulation. I will also
8 demonstrate that this Stipulation represents a fair, just and reasonable compromise
9 of the issues in this proceeding and that this Stipulation is in the public interest.
10 My testimony supports the Company's recommendation that the Idaho Public
11 Utilities Commssion ("Commssion") approve the Stipulation and all of its terms
12 and conditions.
13 Background
14 Q.What price increase did the Company request in this case?
15 A.On September 19,2008, Rocky Mounta Power filed an Application seeking
16 authority to increase the Company's base rates, excluding the curent service
17 agreement with Monsanto and Agrum, for electrc service by $5.9 milion
18 anually, which represented an average increase of approximately 4.0 percent.
19 Rocky Mountai Power sought a rate effective date of October 19, 2008.
20 The Application did not include changes to the rates charged by Rocky
21 Mountain Power to Monsanto or Agrum. The rates for these two customers are
22 subject to the stipulation filed in Case No. PAC-07-05 approved by the
23 Commssion in Order 30482. Monsanto and Agrum received a thee percent
Weston, Stip - 2
Rocky Mountain Power
1 price increase on Janua 1,2009 as a result ofthat stipulation and order.
2 On October 3,2008 the Commission suspended the rates that were the
3 subject ofthe Application for a period of thrt (30) days plus five (5) months
4 makng the rate effective date April 18, 2009. Paries to the Stipulation did not
5 propose revising this date and the Company is respectfully requesting that the
6 Commission approve this Stipulation with April 18, 2009 as the rate effective
7 date.
8 As par of Staffs audit of this Application several meetings were held
9 with Company representatives durng the weeks of October 27th though the 31 st
10 in Portland, Oregon and November 10th through the 14th in Salt Lake City, Uta.
11 In addition hundreds of discovery requests were asked and responded to.
12 Representatives of the intervening paries, (with the exception of Agrum)
13 met on Januar 15,2009 with the Company at the Commission's offce, puruat
14 to IDAPA 31.01.01.271 and 272, to engage in settlement discussions with a view
15 toward resolving the issues rased in Rocky Mounta Power's Application in ths
16 proceeding. Based upon the discussions between the Paries, as a compromise of
17 the positions in ths proceeding a settlement was reached.
18 Test Period
19 Q.What Test Period did the Company use to determine revenue requirement in
20 this case?
21 A.The Test Period for ths Application was based on the historical twelve-month
22 period ending December 31, 2007, adjusted for known and measurable changes
23 though December 31, 2008. The Test Period was prepared consistent with past
Weston, Stip - 3
Rocky Mountan Power
1
2
3
4
5 Q.
6 A.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 Q.
19
20 A.
21
22
23
Commission practice and the Company's general rate cases filed previously in
Idaho. Due to the signficant capita investment being made and the regulatory
lag associated with it relative to the Idaho test year conventions, the Company
relied on and included rate base on an end-of-period basis.
What guided the development of the Test Period in this case?
The primar objective in determining the Test Period was to develop normalized
result of operations which best reflect the conditions durg which time the new
rates will be in effect. The Company relied on historical data with known and
measurable events to reflect as closely as possible the rate effective period that
will exist in 2009.
To parially overcome the effect of regulatory lag, the Company filed rate
base on an end-of-period basis. Actul rate base at December 31, 2007 plus major
capita additions planed to go into service by December 31, 2008. Adjusting to
end-of-period rate base provides more certty while reducing the recovery lag
associated with the Company's signficant capita investment. All of these capita
additions were in service and used and useful prior to the anticipated date of the
price change associated with this rate case.
How do the rate base and net power costs included in the Company's tlling
compare to actual results through December 31, 2008?
As noted in the direct testimony of Mr. A. Richard Walje the Company's
requested rate increase was drven by two key factors: fist, the Company is in the
midst of an unprecedented, and necessar capital investment cycle; and second,
rising costs of fuel and purchased power to serve our customers.
Weston, Stip - 4
Rocky Mountain Power
1 On a total-Company basis, the Company's Application included gross
2 electrc plant in-service balance of $17.4 bilion. The actu balance at December
3 31, 2008 was $18.2 bilion, $800 millon higher than requested in the Application.
4 This additional capital would increase Idao's revenue requirement approximately
5 $7.5 millon.
6 Net power costs continue to trend upward, remain volatile, and are one of
7 the primar cost drvers in ths general rate case. On a tota-Company basis, net
8 power costs in ths application were $982 milion durg the test year, an increase
9 of more than $120 milion above the level supported by the Company in the 2007
10 general rate case. Actual net power costs for the twelve months ended December
11 31, 2008 were approximately $1.1 bilion, $118 millon higher than the amount
12 included in the case. Absent some sort of power cost adjustment mechansm the
13 use of historic test periods for ratemakng under the curent industr conditions,
14 combined with the volatilty of the market and fuel prices and uncertinty of
15 generation resources, results in persistent under-recovery of the actual level of
16 power costs incured durng the period that rates are in effect.
17 Terms of the Stipulation
18 Q.Please describe the terms of the stipulation entered into by the Partes.
19 A.Whle the Paries to the stipulation agreed that ths would be a "black box"
20 settlement with no par accepting a specific methodology for the revenue
21 requirement determination, the Stipulation did identify eight specific items that I
22 will address in my testimony.
23 First, the Paries agreed to support an overall revenue requiement increase
Weston, Stip - 5
Rocky Mountan Power
1 in ths case of $4.8 millon, excluding the contract customers, before grossing tht
2 amount up to produce a total Idaho revenue requirement. Paries to the stipulation
3 agreed that the $4.8 millon would be divided by 36.0553 percent, (the ratio of
4 non-contract to contract customers cost of service from page 2 of Rocky
5 Mounta Power's Exhbit 20 from the Company's direct testimony) to get to an
6 Idaho total revenue requirement increase of$13,312,883.
7 Second, the Paries agreed not to make any adjustments to the Company's
8 Cost of Service analysis. The $13,312,883 increase to Idaho's revenue
9 requirement was input into Stas cost of service model to ru the class
10 allocation. This produced a $4.38 milion or a 3.1 percent revenue requirement
11 increase to non-contract customers, resulting in approximately a $1.5 millon
12 reduction to the Company's original request.
13 Thrd, the Paries agreed to establish the tota Company base net power
14 cost level being recovered in rates as a result of ths Stipulation at $982 milion, as
15 fied in the Application and associated testimony in ths Case, which will be
16 necessar for calculation puroses in Rocky Mountain Power's curently pending
17 Application for approval of an Energy Cost Adjustment Mechansm in Case No.
18 PAC-E-08-08, if such a mechansm is established and approved by the
19 Commssion.
20 Four, the Paries agreed that Rocky Mountain Power's acquisition of the
21 Chehalis generating plant in Chehalis, Washington was a prudent decision and in
22 the public interest, and costs related to the plant acquisition and operation
23 included in ths case are reasonable and are included in the Company's rates.
Weston, Stip - 6
Rocky Mountan Power
1 Fift, the Paries agreed that the Company had complied with Commssion
2 Order No. 30543 to "provide the information necessar for a prudency
3 determation in its next general rate case." The Paries agree that the demand-
4 side management programs proposed by Rocky Mountan Power in Case No.
5 PAC-E-08-01 are prudent.
6 Sixth, the Paries agreed that a total of $50,000 of demand-side
7 management program fuds will be made available to SouthEastern Idaho
8 Communty Action Agency and Eastern Idaho Communty Action Parership to
9 be used to support conservation education as a component of Rocky Mountain
10 Power's low income weatherization program (Schedule 21). Paries agree that it
11 is the responsibility of the Communty Action Parership Association of Idao to
12 propose said education program to Rocky Mountain Power by May 1, 2009.
13 Communty Action Parnership Association of Idaho's proposal will contain a
14 fuding allocation proposal of the $50,000 between the two agencies, objectives
15 and any savings estimates to assist in program evaluations and reporting
16 requirements. The Paries agree that the low income weatherization program
17 (Schedule 21) and the conservation education component of the program is in the
18 public interest and is determined to be cost-effective even though the explicit
19 quantification of benefits may not be possible, and fuermore, the Paries agree
20 to support the justification and recovery of these costs though the demand-side
21 management surcharge fuding.
22 Seventh, the Paries agreed that the issue raised in Company testimony
23 related to the Energy Trust of Oregon Funding of the Goodnoe Hils wid
Weston, Stip - 7
Rocky Mountai Power
1 generation plant will be deferred to Rocky Mountain Power's next fied general
2 rate case.
3 Eighth, Rocky Mounta Power agrees that it will include an inverted tier
4 rate design proposal or option for residential customers in its next fied general
5 rate case for the Commission's consideration.
6 Rate Spread
7 Q.Did the Stipulation specif how the $4.38 milion revenue requirement
8 increase would be spread between customer classes?
9 A.Yes. The Paries agreed to calculate the rate spread based on the ratio of Rocky
10 Mountain Power's requested revenue requirement increase of$5.87 milion to the
11 settled revenue requirement increase of $4.38 millon. Ths amount was ratably
12 applied to Rocky Mountain Power's original proposed price change by customer
13 class. Details ofthe rate spread are included as Exhbit No. 29 of my testimony.
14 A sumar of the rate spread is presented in the following table:
Rate Spread Comparison
Customer Class Proposed Settled
Residential - Schedule 1 4.73%3.53%
Residential - Schedule 36 4.73%3.53%
General Service
Schedule 23/23A 0%0%
Schedule 6/6A/8/35 7.96%5.94%
Schedule 9 7.96%5.94%
Schedule 19 2.31%1.73%
Irrgation
Schedule 10 2.31%1.73%
Public Street Lighting
Schedules 7/7 A, 11, 12 0%0%
Weston, Stip - 8
Rocky Mountain Power
1 Q.
2
3 A.
4
5
6
7
8
9 Q.
10
11 A.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Why does the rate spread filed with the Stipulation difer slightly from
Exhibit No. 29?
The rate spread filed in the Stipulation and in ths table are composite rates
consolidating one or more rate schedules. Exhibit NO.1 lists individua rate
schedules which may differ from the composite rates listed in the Table. The
price change by customer class in the rate spread filed in this table is the same as
provided in the Stipulation, which equals the composite of the price change by
customer class in Exhibit No. 29.
Is the rate spread proposed in the stipulation consistent with Company
witness Mr. Michael J. Zimmerman's direct testimony?
Yes. The Company proposed in Mr. Zimmerman's testimony to follow the cost
of service results with the caveat that no rate schedule receive an increase of more
than two times the overall average increase and that no rate schedule receive a
price decrease. As shown in Exhbit No. 29, the overall average increase to non-
contract customers is 3.1 percent. Consistent with Mr. Zimerman's direct
testimony and as a result of ths settlement, Exhbit No. 29 confrms that no
customer class will receive an increase more than two times the overall average
and that no customer class will receive a price decrease.
19 Rate Design
20 Q.
21 A.
22
23
Did the Stipulation address rate design?
Yes. Paragraph 12 under Section III, Terms of the Stipulation, states, "Paries
agree that the design of rates by rate schedule (rate design) shall be consistent
with the Company's filed proposals as adjusted for the revenue requirement in
Weston, Stip - 9
Rocky Mountain Power
1 this settlement."
2 Biling Determinants
3 Q.Please explain Exhibit No. 30.
4 A.Exhibit No. 30 details the biling determinants used in preparng the pricing
5 proposals in ths Stipulation. It shows biling quantities and prices at present rates
6 and proposed rates based on the Stipulation.
7 Monthly Biling Comparisons
8 Q.Please explain Exhibit No. 31.
9 A.Exhibit No. 31 detals the customer impacts of the Company's proposed pricing
10 changes. For each rate schedule, it shows the dollar and percentage change in
11 monthy bils for varous load and usage levels.
12 Q.How wil the Stipulation impact residential customers?
13 A.For residential customers (Schedules 1 and 36), the Monthy Biling Comparsons
14 show that the Company's rate design proposals produce unform percentage
15 impacts across usage levels. Idaho's average residential customer on Schedule 1
16 uses 850 kWh a month. At that usage level residential customers would
17 experience a $3.09 increase per month to their sumer bils and $2.38 per month
18 to their winter bils.
19 Conclusion
20 Q.Does the Company believe the Stipulation represents a fair, just and
21 reasonable compromise of the issues and is in the public interest?
22 A.Yes. All Paries to the Stipulation believe they negotiated in good faith to reach a
23 reasonable outcome. The Company believes that its initial request of$5.9 milion
Weston, Stip - 10
Rocky Mountain Power
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 Q.
22 A.
was justified to meet the cost of serving the non-contract customers in Idaho. As
pointed out the two drving factors of the Company's rate case, capital additions
and net power costs, for the twelve months ended December 2008 are at levels
signficantly higher than the Company requested in this Case. However, in an
effort to reach an agreement with Paries, the Company was willing to reduce that
request and stipulate to a $4.4 milion price increase. This Stipulation reduces the
Company's requested revenue requiement increase by approximately twenty-five
percent. The Stipulation should also allow the Company to maintan its curent
level of earings and continue to be an excellent provider of energy services in
Idaho. Rocky Mountan Power has continued to procure demand-side as well as
supply-side resources. These resources represent signficant investment the
Company is makng on behalf of its customers to meet their energy needs on a
prudent and cost-effective basis. Customers will benefit from these efforts durng
the rate-effective period and, therefore, should pay the costs associated with these
resources. The Company has been prudent in securg resources for the benefit of
its Idaho customers and should be granted cost recovery. The Company will
continue to work to control its costs while implementing mechansms and pricing
proposals to help customers use electrcity more effciently. For these reasons the
Company supports the Stipulation entered into and requests that the Commission
approve it as filed.
Does this conclude your direct testimony?
Yes.
Weston, Stip - 11
Rocky Mountan Power
2009 fEB 25 AM 10= 0 i
Case No. P AC-E-08-07
Exhbit No. 29
Witness: J. Ted Weston
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ROCKY MOUNTAI POWER
Exhbit Accompanying Stipulation Testimony of J. Ted Weston
Table A - By Rate Schedule
Febru 2009
TABLE A Rocky Mountain PowerROCK MOUNAI POWER
ESTITED IMACT OF PROPOSED REVENUES ON NORMLIED PRESENT REVENUS Exibit No. 29 Page 1 of 1
FROM ELEClC SALES TO ULTITE CONSUMRS Case No. PAe-E-08-07DISTRUTD BY RATE SCHEDULS IN IDAHO Vltness: J. Ted Weston12 MONT ENDING DECEMBER 20
Pret Propose Change in _ue(S-)Reeiue(S-)BaReenue
Averag
LiDe Pret Propo No. of Ba Bas Prt Pr
Nu.Derion Sdi.Sdi.Customers MW ReaeI Reveuez (S-i 0/(tl/Wh (t)/Wh
(I)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9 (10)(II)
(6K5)(7)(5)(5)1(4)(6)1(4)Resdeti Sal..
Reid Serce I I 39,215 399,023 $35,00 $36,27 $1,235 3.53%8.77 9,08
Reid Opou TOO 36 36 16,369 317,378 $22,475 $23,268 $793 3.53%7.08 7.33
AGA-Reenue $5 $5 $0 O.OOk
Tota Redeti 55,585 716,401 $57,482 $59,510 $2,028 ~8.02 8.31
Commerci & IUOOSt
Geera Sece - Lare Power 6 6 1,028 298,916 $17,411 $18,447 $1,037 5.95%3 5.82 6,17
Geer Svc. - Lg. Powe (R 6A 6A 247 36,068 $2,340 $2,482 $142 6.08%3 6.49 6.88
Subrta-Sced 6 1,275 334,984 $19,751 $20,930 $1,179 5.97"10 3 5,90 6,25
9 Geer Sece - Me Volte 8 6 2 2,848 $151 $155 $3 2.293 5.32 5.44
10 Geer Sece - Hi Volte 9 9 12 130,895 $5,672 $6,00 $337 5.94%4.33 4.59
II Iron 10 10 5,331 697,66 $47,382 $4,201 $819 1.73%6.79 6.91
12 Comm. & lnd. Spa He 19 19 148 8,26 $553 $562 $10 1.73%6.71 6.83
13 Gener Serce 23 23 6,183 122,178 $9,710 S9,709 (SO)0.00%1.91 1.91
14 Geeral Serce (R 23A 23A 1,383 18,166 SI,515 SI,515 SO 0.00%8.34 8.34
15 Subtota-S 23 7,567 140,94 SII,225 $11,224 (SO)0.0000 7.%7.96
16 Ge Serce Optioua TOO 35 35 2,587 SI22 S130 S7 5.93%4.73 5.01
17 Tar Cotr-Moosato 1,319,624 $53,545 $53,545 SO 0.00%4.06 4.6
18 Tar Contr-Nu Wes 109,115 $4,239 $4,29 $0 0.00%3.8 3.88
19 AGA-Reeie $471 $471 SO 0.00
20 Tot Comici & IuOOstrial 14,340 2,746,9 S143,1I7 $145,472 $2355 1.65%5.21 5.30
21 Tot Comer & Iudutral 14,339 1427,276 $89571 $91,926 $2355 ~6.28 6.44
(Ecludiug Moianto)
22 PPblic Str Liti
23 Sety Ar Lihtig 7 7 239 284 $104 SI04 $0 0.00 36.72 36,72
24 Sety Ar Lihti (RF)7A 7A 195 138 $54 $54 $0 0.00 39.41 39.41
25 Strt Liti - Compa II II 32 121 $52 S52 SO O,OOA.43,10 43.10
26 Strt Lightig - Cusmer 12 12 294 1,974 $370 $370 SO 0.00%18,75 18.75
27 AGA-Revene SO SO SO 0.00%
28 Tot PubRe Stre Lightig 760 2,517 $581 S581 $0 O.(LOO/23.08 23.08
29 Tot Sal to Ulat Cultomers 70,685 3.465.818 $201,180 $205,562 $4,383 ~5.80 5,93
30 Tot Sales to UI1e Custmers 70,683 23037.079 $143,395 $147,77 $4,383 ~7.04 7.25
(Excludiug Mousato & Nu-Wes)
N_:
I: Inde Sc 34-BPA crit eqalto ær au exludes the Cuer Efcieu Se Ra AdjuSleu
2: Indes Sce 34-BPA cr eqal to.z and excludes the Cuser Efcien Ses Ra Adjustent
3: Ovl reve incre for Schedes 6, 6A and 8 is 5.940/0. bu ra deig crats var by ra scede.
t"ti""r
iUU9 f£ß 2.5 M'~ \0: 01 Case No. PAC-E-08-07
Exhibit No. 30
Witness: J. Ted Weston
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ROCKY MOUNTAI POWER
Exhbit Accompanying Stipulation Testimony of J. Ted Weston
Billng Determinants
Februar 2009
SCHEDULE NO.1
Residential Servce
Cusomer Chage
All kWh (My thoug Octobe)
All kWh (November thoug Aprl)
Minimum I -Pha (peanent)
Minium 3-Pha (panent)
Minimum 1 -Pha (vacation)
Mimum 3-Pha (vacon)
kWh for Minium Bilings (My though October)
kWh for Minium Bilings (November though Aprl)
Seanal Servce Charge
Base Subtota
Temperatue Adjustent (May-October)
Temperatue Adjustent (November-Aprl)
Unbiled
Bas Tota
SCHEDULE NO. 36
Residential Servce Optional TOD
Cusmer Chage
On-Pea kWh (May thugh October)
Of-Pea kWh (My though October)
On-Peak kWh (November thugh Aprl)
Of-Peak kWh (November throug April)
Seana Serce Charge
Bas Subtota
Temperatue Adjustent (My-Octobe)
Temperatue Adjustent (November-April)
Unbiled
Base Tota
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER
State of Idaho
Temperature Adjusted BiDing Determinants
12 Months Ending Dember 2007
Rocky Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 30 Page 1 of 9
Case No. PAG-E-08-07
Vlness: J. Ted Weston
Actl
Units
(Tl)Prent
Price
(Tl)
Propose
Prce
Propose
Revenue
Dollars
Prent
Revenue
Dollars
470,585 $0.00 $0 $0.00 $0
170,032,777 10.0505 ~$17,089,144 10.4009 ~$17,684,939
221,607,387 7.7380 ~$17,147,980 8.0078 ~$17,745,876
35,648 $10.27 $366,105 $10.63 $378,938
197 $30.81 $6,070 $31.89 $6,282
2,773 $14.5 $39,793 $14.85 $41,179
0 $43.05 $0 $44.55 $0
745,868 (10.0505) ~($74,963)(10.4009) ~($77,577)
820,217 (7.7380) ~($63,468)(8.0078) ~($65,681)
0 $172.20 $0 $178.20 $0
391,64,164 $34,510,661 $35,713,956
(3,135,000)($325,353)($347,925)
7,551,00 $603,302 $657,315
2,966,581 $213,709 $213,709
399,022,745 $35,002,319 $36,237,054
196,431 $1317 $2,586,996 $13.63 $2,677,355
51,166,998 10.962 ~$5,608,005 11.494 ~$5,807,147
65,487,796 3.7401 ~$2,449,309 3.8727 ~$2,536,146
81,776,573 9.3625 ~$7,656,332 9.6948 ~$7,928,075
1 16,28,364 3.4230 ~$3,978,497 3.5445 ~$4,119,751
0 $158.09 $0 $163.56 $0
314,659,731 $22,279,139 $23,068,474
3,775,000 $258,477 $279,09
(3,440,000)($200,516)($217,606)
2,383,419 $138,099 $138,09
317,378,150 $22,475,198 $23,268,057
Rocky Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 30 Page 2 of 9
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER Case No. PAC-E-08-07
State of Idaho Witness: J. Ted WestonTemperature Adjuste Biling Determinants
12 Month Ending Deember 200
(Tt)Prent (Tt)Propose
Actal Prent Revenue Prpos Revenue
Units Price Dollars Price Dollars
SCHEDULE NO.6
General Service - Lage Power
Cusomer Charge (Seconda Voltae)12,245 $29.17 $357,187 $30.97 $379,228
Customer Chage (Pimar Voltae)93 $87.51 $8,138 $92.91 $8,641
Tota Cusomer Chages 12,338
All kW (May thoug October)427,784 $10.68 $4,568,733 $11.4 $4,851,071
All kW (November though April)403,511 $8.79 $3,546,862 $9.33 $3,764,758
kWh Seconda 252,766,245 2.9564 t $7,472,781 3.1380 t $7,931,805
kWh Primar 51,950,572 2.9564 t $1,535,867 3.1380 t $1,630,209
Seasnal Servce Chare (Seconda)0 $350.04 $0 $371.75 $0
Seanal Servce Chage (Pmar)0 $1,050.12 $0 $1,115.25 $0
Voltae Discunt 97,86 ($0.53)($51,868)($0.53)($51,868)
Base Subtta 304,716,817 $17,437,700 $18,513,84
Temperae Adj. (My-Oc)(19,934,00)($589,329)($625,529)
Tempetue Adj. (Nov-Apr)(1,813,00)($53,60)($56,892)
Unbiled 15,946,478 $615,891 $615,891
Base Tota 298,916,295 $17,410,663 $18,447,314
SCHDULE NO. 6A
Genera Servce - Large Power (Residential and Far)
Cusomer Chage (Senda Voltae)2,967 $29.17 $86,547 $30.97 $91,888
Customer Charge (Pim Voltae)0 $87.51 $0 $92.91 $0
Tota Customer Chages 2,967
All kW (May though October)60,765 $10.68 $648,970 $11.4 $689,075
All kW (November though April)60,280 $8.79 $529,861 $9.33 $562,412
kWh Seconda 35,438,807 2.9564 t $1,047,713 3.1380 t $1,112,070
kWh Primar 0 2.9564 t $0 3.1380 t $0
Seasnal Servce Charge (Seconda)0 $350.04 $0 $37175 $0
Seanal Serce Charge (Par)0 $1,050.12 $0 $1,115.25 $0
Voltae Discun 0 ($0.53)$0 ($0.53)$0
Bas Subtota 35,438,807 $2,313,091 $2,455,445
Unbiled 629,019 $26,922 $26,922
Bas Tota 36,067,826 $2,340,013 $2,482,367
SCHEDULE NO.7
Cusómer Owned Light
Residential
Charges Per Lamp
16,000 Lumens, HPSV 252 $14.67 $3,697 $14.67 $3,697.00
Avg Cusomers 1
All kw 9,828
Bas Subtota 9,828 $3,697 $3,697
Unbiled 79 $14 $14
Base Tota 9,907 $3,711 $3,711
Rock Mountain Power
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER Exhibit No. 30 Page 3 of 9
Case No. PAe-E-08-07
State of Idaho Wines: J. Ted Weston
Temperature Adjusted Billng Determinants
12 Months Ending Deber 200
(Tl)Prent (Tl)ProposeActlPrentRevenueProposedRevenue
Units Pnce Dollars Pnce DoDars
SCHEDULE NO.7
Securty Area Lightig
Charges Per Lamp
7000 Lumen, MY 1,884 $26.40 $49,738 $26.40 $49,738
20,00 Lumens, MY 300 $47.09 $14,127 $47.09 $14,127
5,600 Lumens, HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 0 $16.77 $0 $16.77 $0
5,600 Lumens, HPSV, No Compay Owned Pole 76 $13.34 $1,014 $13.34 $1,014
9,500 Lumens, HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 156 $19.20 $2,995 $19.20 $2,995
9,500 Lumens, HPV, No Compay Owned Pole 297 $15.77 $4,684 $15.77 $4,684
16,000 Lumens, HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 12 $25.29 $303 $25.29 $303
16,00 Lumens, HPSV, No Compay Owed Pole 60 $22.52 $1,351 $22.52 $1,351
27,500 Lumens, HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 0 $36.37 $0 $36.37 $0
27,500 Lumens HPSV, No Company Owed Pole 84 $32.94 $2,767 $32.94 $2,767
50,00 Lumens, HPSV, Company Owned Pole 12 $50.84 $610 $50.84 $610
50,00 Lumens, HPV, No Compay Owned Pole 48 $45.00 $2,160 $45.00 $2,160
16,00 Lumen, HPS Flood Compay Owed Pole 24 $25.29 $607 $25.29 $607
16,000 Lumens, HPS Floo No Compay Owed Pole 108 $22.52 $2,432 $22.52 $2,432
27,500 Lumens, HPS Floo, Compay Owed Pole 204 $36.37 $7,419 $36.37 $7,419
27,500 Lumens, HPS Flood No Compay Owed Pole 60 $32.94 $1,976 $32.94 $1,976
50,000 Lumens, HPS Flood, Compay Owned Pole 60 $50.84 $3,050 $50.84 $3,050
50,00 Lumens, HP Flood, No Compay Owned Pole 120 $45.00 $5,40 $45.00 $5,400
33,00 Lumens, LPSV, Energy Ony 0 $9.01 $0 $9.01 $0
Avg Cusomer 238
All kWh 274,255
Base Subtota 274,255 $100,633 $100,633
Unbiled 128 $4 $4
Bas Tota 274,383 $100,677 $100,677
SCHEDULE NO. 7A
Securty Area Lighting (Residential and Far)
Charges Per Lamp
7000 Lumens, MY 1,303 $26.40 $34,399 $26.40 $34,399
20,00 Lumens, MY 24 $47.09 $1,130 $47.09 $1,130
5,600 Lumen HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 17 $16.77 $285 $16.77 $285
5,600 Lumens, HPSV, No Compay Owned Pole 157 $13.34 $2,09 $13.34 $2,094
9,500 Lumen, HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 205 $19.20 $3,936 $19.20 $3,936
9,500 Lumens, HPSV, No Compay Owned Pole 462 $15.77 $7,286 $15.77 $7,286
16,000 Lumens HPSV, Compay Owed Pole 84 $25.29 $2,124 $25.29 $2,124
16,000 Lumens, HPSV, No Company Owned Pole 72 $22.52 $1,621 $22.52 $1,621
27,500 Lumens, HPSV, Company Owned Pole 0 $36.37 $0 $36.37 $0
27,500 Lumens, HPSV, No Company Owed Pole 0 $32.94 $0 $32.94 $0
50,00 Lumens, HPSV, Company Owned Pole 0 $50.84 $0 $50.84 $0
50,00 Lumens, HPSV, No Compay Ow Pole 0 $45.00 $0 $45.00 $0
16,000 Lumens, HPS Floo Compay Owed Pole 0 $25.29 $0 $25.29 $0
16,00 Lumens, HPS Flood No Compay Owed Pole 36 $22.52 $811 $22.52 $811
27,500 Lumens, HP Flood, Compay Owed Pole 12 $36.37 $436 $36.37 $436
27,500 Lumens, HP Flood No Compay Owed Pole 0 $32.94 $0 $32.94 $0
50,000 Lumens, HP Floo Compay Owed Pole 0 $50.84 $0 $50.84 $0
50,00 Lumens, HPS Flood, No Compay Owned Pole 0 $45.00 $0 $45.00 $0
33,00 Lumens LPSV, Energy Ony 0 $9.01 $0 $9.01 $0
Avg Customers 195
All kWh 136,752
Bas Subtota 136,752 $54,122 $54,122
Unbiled 1,102 $213 $213
Bas Tota 137,854 $54,335 $54,335
Rock Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 30 Page 4 of 9ROC MOUNAIN POWER Case No. PAe-E-08-7
State of Idaho Witness: J. Ted Weston
Temperature Adjuste Billg Derminants
12 Montb Ending Deember 2007
(£1)Prent (Tt)PropoActlPrntRevenuePrposRevenue
Units Prce Dollars Prce Dollrs
SCHDULE NO.8
Genera Service - Medum Voltae
Moving to Schedule 6
Cusomer Chage 24 $230.68 $5,536 $92.91 $2,230
All kW (My thoug Ocbe)2,550 $8.79 $22,415 $11.4 $28,917
All kW (November thugh Aprl)3,274 $6.59 $21,576 $9.33 $30,546
Mium kW Sumer 0 $8.79 $0 $11.4 $0
Minimum kW Winter 0 $6.59 $0 $9.33 $0
All kWh 2,472,600 3.4897 tP $86,286 3.1380 tP $77,590
Bas Subtota 2,472,60 $135,813 $139,283
Unbiled 375,140 $15,549 $15,549
Base Tota 2,847,740 $151,362 $154,832
SCHEDULE NO.9
Genera Service - High Voltae
Cusmer Chage 144 $282.89 $40,736 $301.0 $43,358
All kW (My thoug Ocober)125,870 $7.40 $931,438 $7.88 $991,856
Al kW (November thugh April)118,076 $5.60 $61,226 $5.96 $703,733
Minimum kW Sumer 0 $7.40 $0 $7.88 $0
Mimum kW Winter I $5.60 $6 $5.96 $6
All kWh 118,203,468 3.0561 tP $3,612,416 3.2519 tP $3,843,859
Base Subtota 118,203,468 $5,245,822 $5,582,812
Unbiled 12.691,932 $425,955 $425,955
Bas Tota 130,895,40 $5,671,7n $6,008,767
SCDULE NO. 10
Irrgaton
Small Customer Chge (Sean)2,086 $1l.54 $24,072 $11.74 $24,490
Large Cusmer Chage (Sean)14,174 $33.54 $475,396 $34.14 $483,90
Post-Seon Cusmer Chage 12,163 $17.76 $216,015 $18.08 $219,907
Tota Customer Chages 28,423
All kW (June 1 . Sept 15)1,354,375 $4.48 $6,067,60 $4.55 $6,162,40
Firs 25,000 kWh (June 1 - Sept 15)199,147,296 7.0083 tP $13,956,840 7.1315 tP $14,202,276
Next 225,00 kWh (June i - Sept 15)288,080,753 5.1843 tP $14,934,970 5.2750 tP $15,196,226
All Add'1 kWh (June 1 - Sept 15)36,817,268 3.8419 tP $1,414,483 3.905 tP $1,439,358
All kWh (Sept 16 -May 31)173,623,n5 5.9281 tP $10,292,591 6.0315 tP $10,472,1l8
Mete 5,331
Bas Subtota 697,66,092 $47,381,967 $48,200,681
Unbiled (3,00)$0 $0
Base Tota 697,66,cn $47,381,967 $48,200,681
Rock Mountain Power
Exibit No. 30 Page 5 of 9ROC MOUNAIN POWER Case No. PAG-E-08-7
State of Idaho Witness: J. Ted Weston
Temperature Adjusted Bilng Detenninants
12 Month Ending Dember 2007
(Tt)Prnt (T1)Propo
Actl Prnt Revenue Proposed Revenue
Units Price Dollars Prce DoUars
SCHEDULE NO. 11
Compay-Own Stree Lightig Serce
Chages per Lamp
5,800 Lumen, High Inenity Discharge 84 $14.89 $1,251 $14.89 $1,251
9,500 Lumens, High Inteity Discharge 1,523 $18.58 $28,297 $18.58 $28,297
16,00 Lumen, High Intensity Dischage 24 $25.33 $68 $25.33 $608
27,500 Lumens, High Intensity Dischage 567 $35.38 $20,06 $35.38 $20,060
50,00 Lumen, High Intensity Dischage 60 $51.93 $3,116 $51.93 $3,1 16
9,500 Lumens, High Intensity Discharge - Series 1 0 $30.73 $0 $30.73 $0
16,000 Lumens, High Intenity Dischage - Series 1 0 $33.73 $0 $33.73 $0
9,500 Lumen, High Intensity Dischage - Seres 2 0 $25.29 $0 $25.29 $0
16,00 Lumens, High Intensity Dischage - Series 2 0 $28.21 $0 $28.21 $0
12,00 Met Hade 0 $27.42 $0 $27.42 $0
19,500 Met Haide 0 $34.03 $0 $34.03 $0
32,00 Met Haide 0 $41.8 $0 $41.28 $0
9,000 Meta Haide - Series 1 0 $31.00 $0 $31.00 $0
12,00 Met Halide - Seres 1 0 $35.64 $0 $35.64 $0
9,00 Met Haide - Seres 2 0 $30.17 $0 $30.17 $0
12,00 Meta Halide - Series 2 0 $31.5 $0 $31.85 $0
Avg Cusmer 32
All kWh 126,477
Bas Subtota 126,477 $53,332 $53,332
Unbiled (5,707)($1,277)($1,2
Base Tota 120,770 $52,055 $52,055
SCHDULE NO. 23S
Trac Sign Systems
Cusmer Chage 342 $13.72 $4,692 $13.72 $4,692
All kWh (My thug Ocbe)84,068 7.6737 It $6,451 7.6737 It $6,451
All kWh (November though Apri)102,491 6.6985 It $6,865 6.6985 It $6,865
Base Subtota 186,559 $18,008 $18,008
Unbiled (7,162)$0 $0
Base Tota 179,397 $18,008 $18,008
Rock Mountain Power
Exibit No. 30 Page 6 of 9ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER Case No. PAG-E-0S-07
State of Idaho \ltness: J. Ted Weston
Temperature Adjusted Bilng Detenninants
12 Month Ending Deember 200
(TI)Presnt (TI)Prpo
Actual Prent Revenue Prpos Revenue
Units Price Dollars Prce Dollars
SCHDULE NO. 12P
Cuomer-Owned Strt Lightig Servce-Paial Maitenance
Chages pe Lam
10,00 Lumens, MY 144 $16.15 $2,326 $16.15 $2,326
20,000 Lumens, MY 240 $21.62 $5,189 $21.62 $5,189
5,800 Lumen, HPSV 48 $5.78 $277 $5.78 $277
9,500 Lumens, HPSV 647 $7.44 $4,814 $7.44 $4,814
27,500 Lumens, HPSV 576 $11.94 $6,877 $11.94 $6,877
50,000 Lumens, HPSV 408 $16.09 $6,565 $16.09 $6,565
Avg Cusomers 16
All kWh 190,449 $26,048 $26,048
Bas Subtota 190,449 $26,048 $26,048
Unbiled (8,361)$0 $0
Base Tota 182,088 $26,048 $26,048
SCHDULE NO. 12F
Custmer-Owed Stret Lighting Servce-Full Mantenace
Charges per Lamp
5,800 Lumens, HPSV 9,961 $6.45 $6,248 $6.45 $6,248
9,500 Lumens, HPSV 23,776 $8.22 $195,439 $8.22 $195,439
16,000 Lumens, HPSV 2,614 $9.88 $25,826 $9.88 $25,826
27,500 Lumens, HPSV 4,114 $12.94 $53,235 $12.94 $53,235
50,000 Lumens, HPSV 780 $17.27 $13,471 $17.27 $13,471
Avg Cusmers 277
All kWh 1,870,782
Base Subtta 1,870,782 $352,219 $352,219
Unbiled (85,557)($9,020)($9,020)
Bas Tota 1,785,225 $343,199 $343,199
SCHEDULE NO. 12E
Customer-Owed Street Lightig Servce-Energy Ony
Charges per Lamp
5,800 Lumens, HPSV 0 $1.1 $0 $1.51 $0
9,500 Lumens, HPSV 0 $2.12 $0 $2.12 $0
16,00 Lumens, HPSV 0 $3.11 $0 $3.1 1 $0
27,500 Lumens, HPSV 0 $5.54 $0 $5.54 $0
50,00 Lumens, HPSV 0 $8.50 $0 $8.50 $0
9,000 Met Haide 0 $2.16 $0 $2.16 $0
12,000 Meta Halide 0 $3.78 $0 $3.78 $0
19,500 Meta Halide 0 $5.23 $0 $5.23 $0
32,000 Meta Halide 0 $8.28 $0 $8.28 $0
107,800 Met Halde 0 $19.61 $0 $19.61 $0
33,00 Lumens, LPSV 96 $9.01 $865 $9.01 $865
Non-Liste Luminaire - Energy Ony 10.1259 t $10.13 t
Avg Customers 1
All kWh 7,104
Base Subtota 7,104 $865 $865
Unbiled (317)($13)($13)
Base Subtota 6,787 $852 $852
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER
State of Idaho
Temperature Adjuste Biling Determinnts
12 Months Ending Deember 207
Rocky Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 30 Page 7 of 9
Case No. PAG-E-08-07
Witnes: J. Ted Weston
SCHDULE NO. t9
Commercial and Industal Spac Heating
Actl
Units
(Tt)Prent
Price
Presnt
Revenue
Dollars
(Tt)Prpoed
Prce
Propo
Revenue
Dollars
Customer Chage Seonda
Ail kWh (My though Octobe)
Ail kWh (November though Apr)
Bas Subtota
Temperae Adj. (My-Oc)
Temperatue Adj. (Nov-Apr)
Unbiled
Base Tota
SCHEDULE NO. 23
Genera Servce
1,773 $19.82 $35,141 $20.15 $35,726
2,676,132 7.7373 ~$207,06 7.8695 ~$210,598
5,862,708 5.7332 ~$336,121 5.8313 ~$341,872
8,538,84 $578,322 $588,196
(330,00)($27,727)($28,097)
66,000 $4,223 $4,274
(38,374)($1,889)($1,889)
8,236,466 $552,929 $562,484
Cusomer Charge Secodar
Cusomer Chage Prar
Tota Custmer Chages
All kWh (My though Ocber)
Ail kWh (November thugh Apri)
Seanal Servce Charge (Secnda)
Seanal Servce Charge (Pmar)
Voltage Discunt
Bas Subtota
kWh Seconda
kWh Prar
Temperate Adj. (My-Oct)
Temperate Adj. (Nov-Apr)
Unbiled
Bas Tota
73,582 $13.72 $1,00,545 $13.72 $1,00,545
204 $41.6 $8,397 $41.6 $8,397
73,786
60,869,135 7.6737 ~$4,670,915 7.6737 ~$4,670,915
66,106,772 6.6985 ~$4,428,162 6.6985 ~$4,428,162
0 $164.64 $0 $164.64 $0
0 $493.92 $0 $493.92 $0
1,493,943 (0.3706) ~($5,537)(0.3706) ~($5,537)
126,975,907 $10,111,482 $10,11,482
125,481,984
1,493,943
(5,497,000)($492,504)($492,575)
253,00 $20,200 $20,204
849,191 $49,799 $49,799
122,581,098 $9,688,977 $9,688,909
SCHEDULE NO. 23A
Genera Service (Residential & Far)
Customer Chage Seconda
Customer Chage Prmar
Tota Customer Chages
Ail kWh (My though Ocber)
All kWh (November though April)
Seasnal Servce Charge (Seconda)
Seasll Serce Chatge (Par)
Voltae Discount
Bas Subtota
kWh Seconda
kWh Prar
Unbiled
Ba Tota
16,599 $13.72 $227,738 $13.72 $227,738
2 $41.6 $82 $41.6 $82
16,601
7,181,759 7.6737 ~$551,107 7.6737 ~$551,107
10,735,995 6.6985 ~$719,151 6.6985 ~$719,151
0 $164.64 $0 $164.64 $0
0 $493.92 $0 $493.92 $0
646 (0.3706) ~($2)(0.3706) ~($2)
17,917,754 $1,498,076 $1,498,076
17,917,108
646
247,832 $16,882 $16,882
18,165,586 $1,514,958 $1,514,958
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER
State of Idaho
Temperature Adjuste Bilg Determinants
12 Month Ending Deember 200
Rocky Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 30 Page 8 of 9
Case No. PAC-E-08-07
Witness: J. Ted Weston
Actual
Units
(T1)Prent
Price
Prent
Revenue
DoUars
(T1)Propos
Prce
Propo
Revenue
DoUars
SCHDULE NO. 23F
Genera Servce
Customer Charge
Sprinker Timer, 32 kWhO
School Flashig Light, $7/MO
Cable TV Power Supply Output, 60V, 15 AMS, 493 kWhC
Cable TV Power Supply Output, 6OV, 14 AMS, 46 kWhC
Cable TV Power Supply Output, 60V, 12 AMS, 394 kWhC
Avg Cusomers
All kWh
Bas Subtota
Unbiled
Base Tota
SCHEDULE NO. 35
Genera Servce - Optional TOD
72 $13.72 $988 $1372 $987.84
36 $2.30 $83 $2.30 $83
48 $7.47 $359 $7.47 $359
12 $35.43 $425 $35.43 $425
12 $33.06 $397 $33.06 $397
12 $28.31 $340 $28.31 $340
6
17,796
17,796 $2,592 $2,592
(108)($12)($12)
17,688 $2,580 $2,580
Cusomer Chage Seconda
Customer Chage Prmar
Tota Custmer Chages
All Ou-Pea kW
All kWh
Senal Servce Chare (Secnda)
Seasna Serice Chage (Pmar)
Voltae Discount
Base Subtotal
Unbiled
Base Tota
36 $51.44 $1,852 $54.75 $1,971
0 $126.72 $0 $134.80 $0
36
1,851 $12.67 $23,452 $13.48 $24,951
2,329,458 3.7745 t $87,925 4.0167 t $93,567
0 $617.28 $0 $656.72 $0
0 $1,520.64 $0 $1,617.81 $0
0 ($0.69)$0 ($0.69)$0
2,329,458 $113,229 $120,489
257,685 $9,133 $9,133
2,587,143 $122,362 $129,622
SCHDULE 401
Nu-West
Cusomer Chages
HLH kWh (My-October)
HLH kWh (Novembe-April)
LLH kWh (My-Ocober)
LLH kWh (November-Aprl)
All kW (My-October)
All kW (Novembe-April)
Unbiled
Tota
12 $310.Oû $3,720 $310.Oû $3,720
23,703,730 2.5480 t $603,971 $2.55 t $603,971
25,566,632 2.1190 t $541,757 $2.12 t $541,757
28,655,270 1.9110 t $547,602 $1.91 t $547,602
31,189,368 1.9110 t $596,029 $1.91 t $596,029
86,262 $12.34 $1,06,473 $12.34 $1,06,473
88,558 $9.95 $881,152 $9.95 $881,152
$0
109,115,00 $4,238,704 $4,238,704
ROCKY MOUNAIN POWER
State of Idaho
Temperature Adjuste Billg Derminants
t2 Months Ending Dember 200
Rocky Mountain Power
Exibit No. 30 Page 9 of 9
Case No. PAG-E-08-07
Witness: J. Ted Weston
(Tt)Presnt (Tt)Prpo
Actul Prent Reenue Proposed Revenue
Units Prce DoDaI'Price DoDaI'
SCHDULE 400
Monsanto Fin
Cusmer Charges 12 $1,135.00 $13,620 $1,135.00 $13,620
Fin kWh 78,840,000 2.2020 r-$1,736,057 $2.20 r-$1,736,057
FinkW 108,000 $11.5 $1,225,800 $11.5 $1,225,800
ExcesskVar 37,124 $0.75 $27,843 $0.75 $27,843
Unbilled
Tota-Nonnalized 78,840,000 $3,003,320 $3,003,320
Monsanto Non.Finn
Cusomer Chages
Non-Fin kWhNet 1,183,805,00 2.2020 r-$26,067,386 2.2020 r-$26,067,386
Non-FinkW 2,045,821 $11.5 $23,220,068 $11.5 $23,220,068
Non-Fin kW Discount 2,045,821 ($7.70)($15,752,822)($7.70)($15,752,822)
Replacent-kWh 38,255,00 $2,436,003
Curled kWh 56,979,300 2.2020 r-$1,254,684 2.2020 r-$1,254,684
Unbiled
Tota-Normiz 1,240,784,300 $50,542,138 $50,542,138
1,319,624,300 $53,545,458 $53,545,458
IDAHO JUDICTONAL TOTALS:
Base Subtota 3,452,114,836 $200,000,980 $204,388,416
Tempetu Adj (22,504,000)($802,826)($87,742)
Unbiled 36,200,00 $1,500,00 $1,500,00
AGARevenue 0 $481,406 $481,406RM00
Bae Tota 3,465,817,940 201,179,560 205,562,080
l\ t t'~r~
20U9 FEB 25 AM 10: 07 Case No. PAC-E-08-07
Exhibit No. 31
Witness: J. Ted Weston
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
ROCKY MOUNTAI POWER
Exhbit Accompanying Stipulation Testimony of J. Ted Weston
Monthly Biling Comparsons - By Rate Schedule
Febru 2009
Ro
c
k
y

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

P
o
w
e
r
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e

1
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

P
r
i
c
e
s

1
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
r
i
c
e
s

1
Do
l
l
a
r

C
h
a
n
g
e
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

C
h
a
n
g
e
kW
h
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
0
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
1
.
0
3
$1
1
.
0
3
$0
.
3
7
$0
.
3
7
3.
5
1
%
3.
5
1
%
50
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
1
.
0
3
$1
1
.
0
3
$0
.
3
7
$0
.
3
7
3.
5
1
%
3.
5
1
%
10
0
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
0
.
6
5
$1
1
.
0
3
$1
1
.
0
3
$0
.
3
7
$0
.
3
7
3.
5
1
%
3.
5
1
%
15
0
$1
5
.
6
4
$1
2
.
0
4
$1
6
.
1
8
$1
2
.
4
6
$0
.
5
5
$0
.
4
2
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
20
0
$2
0
.
8
5
$1
6
.
0
5
$2
1
.
8
$1
6
.
6
1
$0
.
7
3
$0
.
5
6
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
30
0
$3
1
.
2
7
$2
4
.
0
8
$3
2
.
3
6
$2
4
.
9
2
$1
.
0
9
$0
.
8
4
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
40
0
$4
1
.
7
0
$3
2
.
1
0
$4
3
.
1
5
$3
3
.
2
2
$1
.
4
5
$1
.
2
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
50
0
$5
2
.
1
2
$4
0
.
1
3
$5
3
.
9
4
$4
1
.
5
3
$1
.
8
2
$1
.
4
0
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
60
0
$6
2
.
5
5
$4
8
.
1
6
$6
4
.
7
3
$4
9
.
8
3
$2
.
1
8
$1
.
6
8
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
70
0
$7
2
9
7
$5
6
.
1
8
$7
5
.
5
1
$5
8
.
1
4
$2
.
5
4
$1
.
9
6
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
80
0
$8
3
.
4
0
$6
4
.
2
1
$8
6
.
3
0
$6
6
.
4
5
$2
.
9
1
$2
.
2
4
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
85
0

*
$8
8
.
6
1
$6
8
.
2
2
$9
1
.
0
$7
0
.
6
0
$3
.
0
9
$2
.
3
8
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
90
0
$9
3
.
8
2
$7
2
2
3
$9
7
.
0
9
$7
4
.
7
5
$3
.
2
7
$2
.
5
2
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
0
0
0
$1
0
4
.
2
4
$8
0
.
2
6
$1
0
7
.
8
8
$8
3
.
0
6
$3
.
6
3
$2
.
8
0
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
1
0
0
$1
1
4
.
6
7
$8
8
.
2
8
$1
1
8
.
6
7
$9
1
.
6
$4
.
0
0
$3
.
0
8
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
2
0
0
$1
2
5
.
0
9
$9
6
.
3
1
$1
2
9
.
4
5
$9
9
.
6
7
$4
.
3
6
$3
.
3
6
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
4
0
0
$1
4
5
.
9
4
$1
1
2
.
3
6
$1
5
1
.
0
3
$1
1
6
.
2
8
$5
.
0
9
$3
.
9
2
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
6
0
0
$1
6
6
.
7
9
$1
2
8
.
4
1
$1
7
2
.
6
1
$1
3
2
.
8
9
$5
.
8
1
$4
.
4
8
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
1,
8
0
0
$1
8
7
.
6
4
$1
4
4
.
4
7
$1
9
4
.
1
8
$1
4
9
.
5
0
$6
.
5
4
$5
.
0
4
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
2,
0
0
0
$2
0
8
.
4
9
$1
6
0
.
5
2
$2
1
5
.
7
6
$1
6
6
.
1
1
$7
,
2
7
$5
.
6
0
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
2,
2
0
0
$2
2
9
.
3
4
$1
7
6
.
5
7
$2
3
7
.
3
3
$1
8
2
.
7
3
$8
.
0
0
$6
.
1
6
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
No
t
e
s
:
i.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
.
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
l
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
c
e
s

Ra
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
2.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
.
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
l
s

z
e
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
c
e
s

Ra
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
*A
v
e
r
a
g
e

M
o
n
t
h
y

U
s
a
g
e
s(
"
~
;
i
ii

I
I

:
:

0
¡¡
l
t
¡
;
Q
.
II

z
;
:
-
4
!'
?

z
~
!'
,
,
?

i
:
-i

;
i

(
,

:
:
CD

t
"

.
.

I
i
Q.
ì
"
~
_
.
m
.
.
:
:
S
b
e
!

"
!,
C
¡
C
D

~
S-
O
.
.
c
o
::

.
.

0

.
.
..co
Rock Mountain Power
Exhibit No. 31 Page 2 of 8
Case No. PAC-E-08-07
Witness: J. Ted Weston
Rocky Mountain Power
State of Idaho
Monthly Billing Comparison
Schedule 6
General Service - Large Power
Secondary
Monthly Biling
kW Prent Prices Proposed Prices Percentage Increase
Load Siz kWh Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Anuaizd
0 0 $30.26 $30.26 $32.12 $32.12 6.17%6.17%6.17%
25 $31.02 $31.02 $32.94 $32.94 6.17OÆ.6.17%6.17%
20 100 $254.87 $215.66 $270.61 $228.92 6.18%6.15%6.16%
500 $267.13 $227.93 $283.63 $241.94 6.18%6.15%6.16%
1,000 $282.46 $243.26 $299.91 $258.21 6.17%6.15%6.16%
2,000 $313.13 $273.92 $332.45 $290.76 6.17%6.15%6.16%
3,000 $343.79 $304.59 $365.00 $323.31 6.17%6.15%6.16%
5,000 $405.12 $365.91 $430.10 $388.40 6.17%6.15%6.16%
7,000 $466.5 $427.24 $495.19 $453.49 6.16%6.14%6.15%
25 2,500 $383.85 $334.84 $407.54 $355.2 6.17%6.15%6.16%
5,000 $460.51 $411.50 $488.90 $436.79 6.17%6.15%6.16%
7,500 $537.17 $488.16 $570.27 $518.15 6.16%6.14%6.15%
10,000 $613.83 $564.82 $651.64 $599.52 6.16%6.14%6.15%
50 5,000 $737.44 $639.42 $782.95 $678.71 6.17%6.14%6.16%
10,000 $890.76 $792.74 $945.69 $841.45 6.17%6.14%6.16%
15,000 $1,044.08 $946.06 $1,108.42 $1,004.19 6.16%6.14%6.15%
20,000 $1,197.40 $1,099.38 $1,271.6 $1,166.92 6.16%6.14%6.15%
100 10,000 $1,444.62 $1,248.59 $1,533.78 $1,325.30 6.17%6.14%6.16%
20,000 $1,751.6 $1,555.23 $1,859.25 $1,650.78 6.17%6.14%6.16%
30,000 $2,057.90 $1,861.87 $2,184.73 $1,976.25 6.16%6.14%6.15%
40,000 $2,364.54 $2,168.51 $2,510.20 $2,301.72 6.16%6.14%6.15%
50,000 $2,671.7 $2,475.14 $2,835.67 $2,627.20 6.16%6.14%6.15%
60,000 $2,977.81 $2,781.78 $3,161.5 $2,952.67 6.16%6.14%6.15%
200 20,000 $2,858.99 $2,466.93 $3,035.44 $2,618.48 6.17%6.14%6.16%
40,000 $3,472.27 $3,080.20 $3,686.39 $3,269.43 6.17%6.14%6.15%
60,000 $4,085.54 $3,693.48 $4,337.33 $3,920.38 6.16%6.14%6.15%
80,000 $4,698.82 $4,306.76 $4,988.28 $4,571.2 6.16%6.14%6.15%
100,000 $5,312.09 $4,920.03 $5,639.23 $5,222.27 6.16%6.14%6.15%
120,000 $5,925.37 $5,533.31 $6,290.17 $5,873.22 6.16%6.14%6.15%
Note:
1. Includes Cusmer Effciency Serice Rate Adjustment.
Rock Mountain Power
Exibit No. 31 Page 3 of 8
Case No. PAC-E-oa-07
Witness: J. Ted Weston
Rocky Mountain Power
State ofIdaho
Monthly Bilg Comparison
Schedule 6A *
General Service - Large Power
Secondary
Monthly Biling
kW Present Prices Proposed Prices Percentage Increase
Load Siz kWh Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Anuaizd
0 0 $30.26 $30.26 $32.12 $32.12 6.17%6.17%6.17%
25 $31.02 $31.02 $32.94 $32.94 6.17%6.17%6.17%
20 100 $254.87 $215.66 $270.61 $228.92 6.18%6.15%6.16%
500 $267.13 $227.93 $283.63 $241.94 6.18%6.15%6.16%
1,000 $282.46 $243.26 $299.91 $258.21 6.17%6.15%6.16%
2,000 $313.13 $273.92 $332.45 $290.76 6.17%6.15%6.16%
3,000 $343.79 $304.59 $365.00 $323.31 6.17%6.15%6.16%
5,000 $405.12 $365.91 $430.10 $388.40 6.17%6.15%6.16%
7,000 $466.45 $427.24 $495.19 $453.49 6.16%6.14%6.15%
25 2,500 $383.85 $334.84 $407.54 $355.2 6.17%6.15%6.16%
5,000 $460.51 $411.50 $488.90 $436.79 6.17%6.15%6.16%
7,500 $537.17 $488.16 $570.27 $518.15 6.16%6.14%6.15%
10,000 $613.83 $564.82 $651.64 $599.52 6.16%6.14%6.15%
50 5,000 $737.44 $639.42 $782.95 $678.71 6.17%6.14%6.16%
10,000 $890.76 $792.74 $945.69 $841.45 6.17%6.14%6.16%
15,000 $1,044.08 $946.06 $1,108.42 $1,004.19 6.16%6.14%6.15%
20,000 $1,197.40 $1,099.38 $1,271.6 $1,166.92 6.16%6,14%6.15%
100 10,000 $1,444.62 $1,248.59 $1,533.78 $1,325.30 6.17%6.14%6.16%
20,000 $1,751.6 $1,555.23 $1,859.25 $1,650.78 6.17%6.14%6.16%
30,000 $2,057.90 $1,861.87 $2,184.73 $1,976.25 6.16%6.14%6.15%
40,000 $2,364.54 $2,168.51 $2,510.20 $2,301.72 6.16%6.14%6.15%
50,00 $2,671.7 $2,475.14 $2,835.67 $2,627.20 6.16%6.14%6.15%
60,000 $2,977.81 $2,781.78 $3,161.5 $2,952.67 6.16%6.14%6.15%
200 20,000 $2,858.99 $2,466.93 $3,035.44 $2,618.48 6.17%6.14%6.16%
40,000 $3,472.27 $3,080.20 $3,686.39 $3,269.43 6.17%6.14%6.15%
60,000 $4,085.54 $3,693.48 $4,337.33 $3,920.38 6.16%6.14%6.15%
80,000 $4,698.82 $4,306.76 $4,988.28 $4,571.2 6.16%6.14%6.15%
100,000 $5,312.09 $4,920.03 $5,639.23 $5,222.27 6.16%6.14%6.15%
120,000 $5,925.37 $5,533.31 $6,290.17 $5,873.22 6.16%6.14%6.15%
* For cusomers quaifYin for the BP A Credit
1. Includes cinnt Schee 34-BPA Credt which equas zeo and Cutomer Effciency Servce Ra Adjustment.
2. Includes cinnt Schedule 34-BPA Cret which equals zeo and Customer Effciency Services Rate Adjusent.
Rock Mountain Power
Exibit No. 31 Page 4 of 8
Case No. PAG-E-08-07
Witness: J. Ted Weston
Rocky Mountain Power
State ofIdaho
Monthly Biling Companson
Schedule 9
General Servce - High Voltage
Monthly Big
kW Preent I'ce Prpose Prices Percentage lncre
Load Size kWh Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Anua
100 20,000 $1,694.90 $1,508.20 $1,804.19 $1,605.05 6.45%6.42%6.43%
40,000 $2,328.86 $2,142.16 $2,478.76 $2,279.62 6.44%6.42%6.43%
60,000 $2,962.81 $2,776.12 $3,153.34 $2,954.19 6.43%6.41%6.42%
500 100,000 $7,300.84 $6,367.36 $7,771.74 $6,776.03 6.45%6.42%6.43%
200,000 $10,470.63 $9,531.15 $11,144.61 $10,148.90 6.44%6.41%6.43%
300,000 $13,640.41 $12,706.93 $14,517.48 $13,521.77 6.43%6.41%6.42%
1000 200,000 $14,308.27 $12,441.31 $15,231.8 $13,239.75 6.45%6.42%6.43%
400,000 $20,647.84 $18,780.88 $21,976.92 $19,985.50 6.44%6.41%6.43%
600,000 $26,987.42 $25,120.46 $28,722.66 $26,731.4 6.43%6.41%6.42%
2000 400,000 $28,323.12 $24,589.20 $30,150.06 $26,167.21 6.45%6.42%6.43%
800,000 $41,002.27 $37,268.35 $43,641.4 $39,658.69 6.44%6.41%6.43%
1,200,000 $53,681.42 $49,947.50 $57,133.02 $53,150.17 6.43%6.41%6.42%
3000 600,000 $42,337.98 $36,737.10 $45,068.93 $39,094.66 6.45%6.42%6.43%
1,200,000 $61,356.70 $55,755.82 $65,306.16 $59,331.89 6.44%6.41%6.43%
1,800,000 $80,375.42 $74,774.54 $85,543.38 $79,569.11 6.43%6.41%6.42%
4000 800,000 $56,352.83 $48,884.99 $59,987.81 $52,022.11 6.45%6.42%6.43%
1,600,000 $81,n1.2 $74,243.28 $86,970.78 $79,005.08 6.4%6.41%6.43%
2,400,000 $107,069.42 $99,601.8 $113,953.74 $105,988.05 6.43%6.41%6.42%
46,00 lp 69,000 volls
Note:
Includes Cusmer Effciency Serces Rate Adjusent.
Ro
c
k
y

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

P
o
w
e
r
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
1
i
n
g

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e

t
o
-
I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Sm
a
l
l

P
u
m
p
i
n
g

O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Se
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
kW
Lo
a
d

S
i
z
e
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
r
i
c
e
s

2
Se
a
s
o
n

P
o
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

C
h
a
n
g
e
Se
a
s
o
n

P
o
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

P
r
i
c
e
s

i
Se
a
s
o
n

P
o
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Do
l
l
a
r

C
h
a
n
g
e
Se
a
s
o
n

P
o
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
kW
h
5
35
0
$6
0
.
6
4
$3
9
.
9
4
$6
1
.
6
6
$4
0
.
6
5
$1
.
0
2
$0
.
7
1
1.
6
8
%
70
0
$8
6
.
0
9
$6
1
.
4
6
$8
7
.
5
5
$6
2
.
5
4
$1
.
4
7
$1
.
0
8
1.
7
0
%
1,
1
0
0
$1
1
5
.
1
6
$8
6
.
0
6
$1
1
7
.
1
4
$8
7
.
5
7
$1
.
9
8
$1
.
5
1
1.
7
2
%
10
70
0
$1
0
9
.
3
2
$6
1
.
4
6
$1
1

1
.
5
$6
2
.
5
4
$1
.
8
3
$1
.
0
8
1.
6
7
%
1,
4
0
0
$1
6
0
.
2
0
$1
0
4
.
5
0
$1
6
2
.
9
3
$1
0
6
.
3
3
$2
.
7
2
$1
.
8
3
1.
7
0
%
2,
2
0
0
$2
1
8
.
3
5
$1
5
3
.
6
9
$2
2
2
.
1
0
$1
5
6
.
3
8
$3
.
7
5
$2
.
6
9
1.
7
2
%
20
1,
4
0
0
$2
0
6
.
6
7
$1
0
4
.
5
0
$2
1
0
.
1
2
$1
0
6
.
3
3
$3
.
4
5
$1
.
8
3
1.
6
7
%
2,
8
0
0
$3
0
8
.
3
$1
9
0
.
5
8
$3
1
3
.
6
7
$1
9
3
.
9
2
$5
.
2
4
$3
.
3
3
1.
7
0
%
4,
4
0
0
$4
2
4
.
7
4
$2
8
8
.
9
6
$4
3
2
.
0
2
$2
9
4
.
0
1
$7
.
2
8
$5
.
0
5
1.
7
1
%
50
3,
5
0
0
$4
9
8
.
7
2
$2
3
3
.
6
2
$5
0
7
.
0
3
$2
3
7
.
7
1
$8
.
3
1
$4
.
0
9
1.
6
7
%
7,
0
0
0
$7
5
3
.
1
3
$4
4
8
.
8
2
$7
6
5
.
9
2
$4
5
6
.
6
6
$1
2
.
7
9
$7
.
8
4
1.
7
0
%
11
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
4
3
.
8
9
$6
9
4
.
7
7
$1
,
0
6
1
.
7
9
$7
0
6
.
9
0
$1
7
.
9
0
$1
2
.
1
3
1.
7
1
%
10
0
7,
0
0
0
$9
8
5
.
4
7
$4
4
8
.
8
2
$1
,
0
0
1
.
8
8
$4
5
6
.
6
6
$1
6
.
2
$7
.
8
4
1.
6
7
%
14
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
9
4
.
3
0
$8
7
9
.
2
3
$1
,
5
1
9
.
6
6
$8
9
4
.
5
7
$2
5
.
3
6
$1
5
.
3
5
1.
7
0
%
22
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
7
5
.
8
2
$1
,
3
7
1
.
2
$2
,
1
1

1
.
4
1
$1
,
3
9
5
.
0
4
$3
5
.
5
9
$2
3
.
9
3
1.
7
1
%
No
t
e
s
:
I.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
-
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
c
e
s

R
a
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
2.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
-
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

R
a
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
1.
7
7
%
1.
7
6
%
1.
7
6
%
1.
7
6
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
1.
7
5
%
s
C
'

m
;
o
;:
l
l
)
(
O
ii
l
l

~

Q
.
th

z
;
:
'
-
!'

0

z

s
:
c.
.

0
0
.
'
"
.

c
:
ro

i
'

~

~
Q.

i
i

'
"

3
"
~
6
i
!

'
"
II

c
¡

C
D

~
S"
0
(
J
C
D
::

.
.

0

.
.
..00
Ro
c
k
y

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

P
o
w
e
r
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g

C
o
m
p
a
r
i
s
o
n
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e

t
o
-
I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
La
r
g
e

P
u
m
p
i
n
g

O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Se
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g
kW
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

P
r
i
c
e
s

1
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
r
i
c
e
s

2
Do
l
l
a
r

C
h
a
n
g
e
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

C
h
a
n
g
e
Lo
a
d

S
i
z
e
kW
h
Se
a
s
o
n
Po
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Se
a
s
o
n
Po
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Se
a
s
o
n
Po
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
Se
a
s
o
n
Po
s
t

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
70
0
$1
3
2
.
1
4
$6
1
.
4
6
$1
3
4
.
3
8
$6
2
.
5
4
$2
.
2
4
$1
.
0
8
1.
7
0
%
1.
7
6
%
2,
2
0
0
$2
4
1
.
7
$1
5
3
.
6
9
$2
4
5
.
3
3
$1
5
6
.
3
8
$4
.
1
6
$2
.
6
9
1.
7
3
%
1.
7
5
%
3,
6
0
0
$3
4
2
.
9
4
$2
3
9
.
7
7
$3
4
8
.
8
9
$2
4
3
.
9
6
$5
.
9
5
$4
.
1
9
1.
4
%
1.
7
5
%
20
1,
4
0
0
$2
2
9
.
4
9
$1
0
4
.
5
0
$2
3
3
.
3
5
$1
0
6
.
3
3
$3
.
8
6
$1
.
8
3
1.
6
8
%
1.
7
5
%
4,
4
0
0
$4
4
7
.
5
6
$2
8
8
.
9
6
$4
5
5
.
2
6
$2
9
4
.
0
1
$7
.
7
0
$5
.
0
5
1.
7
2
%
1.
7
5
%
7,
2
0
0
$6
5
1
.
0
9
$4
6
1
.
2
$6
6
2
.
3
7
$4
6
9
.
1
8
$1
1
.
8
$8
.
0
5
1.
7
3
%
1.
7
5
%
50
3,
5
0
0
$5
2
1
.
4
$2
3
3
.
6
2
$5
3
0
.
2
6
$2
3
7
.
7
1
$8
.
7
3
$4
.
0
9
1.
6
7
%
1.
7
5
%
11
,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
6
6
.
7
1
$6
9
4
.
7
7
$1
,
0
8
5
.
0
3
$7
0
6
.
9
0
$1
8
.
3
1
$1
2
.
1
3
1.
7
2
%
1.
7
5
%
18
,
0
0
0
$1
,
5
7
5
.
5
4
$1
,
1
2
5
.
1
7
$1
,
6
0
2
.
8
0
$1
,
1
4
4
.
8
1
$2
7
.
2
6
$1
9
.
6
4
1.
7
3
%
1.
7
5
%
10
0
7,
0
0
0
$1
,
0
0
8
.
2
8
$4
4
8
.
8
2
$1
,
0
2
5
.
1
1
$4
5
6
.
6
6
$1
6
.
8
3
$7
.
8
4
1.
6
7
%
1.
7
5
%
22
,
0
0
0
$2
,
0
9
8
.
6
4
$1
,
3
7
1
.
2
$2
,
1
3
4
.
6
4
$1
,
3
9
5
.
0
4
$3
6
.
0
0
$2
3
.
9
3
1.
7
2
%
1.
7
5
%
36
,
0
0
0
$2
,
9
0
8
.
1
9
$2
,
2
3
1
.
9
3
$2
,
9
5
8
.
3
8
$2
,
2
7
0
.
8
7
$5
0
.
1
9
$3
8
.
9
4
1.
7
3
%
1.
7
4
%
20
0
14
,
0
0
0
$1
,
9
8
1
.
7
8
$8
7
9
.
2
3
$2
,
0
1
4
.
8
2
$8
9
4
.
5
7
$3
3
.
0
4
$1
5
.
3
5
1.
6
7
%
1.
7
5
%
44
,
0
0
0
$3
,
8
0
3
.
0
3
$2
,
7
2
3
.
8
2
$3
,
8
6
8
.
0
0
$2
,
7
7
1
.
4
$6
4
.
9
7
$4
7
.
5
2
1.
7
1
%
1.
7
4
%
72
,
0
0
0
$5
,
3
0
8
.
6
3
$4
,
4
4
5
.
4
3
$5
,
3
9
9
.
9
4
$4
,
5
2
2
.
9
8
$9
1
.

1
$7
7
.
5
5
1.
7
2
%
1.
7
4
%
50
0
35
,
0
0
0
$4
,
7
1
3
.
0
8
$2
,
1
7
0
.
4
4
$4
,
7
9
1
.
7
$2
,
2
0
8
.
3
1
$7
8
.
2
9
$3
7
.
8
7
1.
6
6
%
1.
7
4
%
11
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
7
4
5
.
9
5
$6
,
7
8
1
.
9
1
$8
,
8
9
4
.
7
8
$6
,
9
0
0
.
2
1
$1
4
8
.
8
3
$1
1
8
.
3
0
1.
7
0
%
1.
7
4
%
18
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
,
5
0
9
.
9
6
$1
1
,
0
8
5
.
9
5
$1
2
,
7
2
4
.
6
4
$1
1
,
2
7
9
.
3
2
$2
1
4
.
6
8
$1
9
3
.
3
8
1.
7
2
%
1.
7
4
%
10
0
0
70
,
0
0
0
$8
,
9
1
8
.
4
2
$4
,
3
2
2
.
4
6
$9
,
0
6
5
.
9
3
$4
,
3
9
7
.
8
6
$1
4
7
.
5
1
$7
5
.
4
0
1.
6
5
%
1.
7
4
%
;¡

(
"

m

;
:
22
0
,
0
0
0
$1
6
,
9
8
4
.
1
5
$1
3
,
5
4
5
.
4
0
$1
7
,
2
7
2
.
7
5
$1
3
,
7
8
1
.
6
7
$2
8
8
.
6
0
$2
3
6
.
2
7
1.
7
0
%
1.
7
4
%
_I
l

~
o
¡¡

i
ß

6
'
2
-
36
0
,
0
0
0
$2
2
,
9
8
0
.
6
0
$2
2
,
1
5
3
.
4
7
$2
3
,
3
7
4
.
5
1
$2
2
,
5
3
9
.
8
9
$3
9
3
.
9
1
$3
8
6
.
2
1.
7
1
%
1.
7
4
%
II

z
;
O
!'

0

Z

s
:
c.
'

0

0
.
"
'
.

i
:
-l

;
i

(
.

;
a
lc
;
:
;
!
!
.
No
t
e
s
:
m
:
i
~
,

.
!

"
'
1.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
-
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
l
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
c
e
s

R
a
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
ci
°
(
D
o
!!

6

C
l
:
e
2.

I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
4
-
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s

R
a
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
g
.
.

0

!
!
..CD
Rocky Mountain Power
Exibit No. 31 Page 7 of 8
Case No. PAC-E-08-07
\/tness: J. Ted Weston
Rocky Mountain Power
State ofldaho
Monthly Biling Comparion
Schedule 19
General Service - Small Power
Secondary
Monthly Biling
Present Prices Proposed Prices Percentage Increase
kWh Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Anuaiz
0 $20.56 $20.56 $20.90 $20.90 1.66%1.66%1.66%
250 $40.62 $35.42 $41.1 $36.02 1.69%1.68%1.69%
500 $60.68 $50.29 $61.71 $51.4 1.69%1.69%1.690Æi
750 $80.75 $65.16 $82.12 $66.26 1.70%1.70%1.70"Æi
1,000 $100.81 $80.02 $102.52 $81.8 1.70%1.70"Æi 1.70"Æi
1,250 $120.87 $94.89 $122.93 $96.50 1.70%1.70%1.0%
1,500 $140.93 $109.75 $143.33 $111.62 1.70%1.70%1.70%
1,750 $161.00 $124.62 $163.74 $126.74 1.70%1.70%1.70%
2,000 $181.06 $139.49 $184.14 $141.6 1.70%1.70%1.70%
2,250 $201.2 $154.35 $204.55 $156.98 1.70%1.70%1.70%
2,500 $221.9 $169.22 $224.96 $172.11 1.70%1.71%1.71%
2,750 $241.25 $184.09 $245.36 $187.23 1.70"Æi 1.71%1.71%
3,000 $261.31 $198.95 $265.77 $202.35 1.71%1.71%1.71%
3,250 $281.7 $213.2 $286.17 $217.47 1.71%1.71%1.71%
3,500 $301.44 $228.68 $306.58 $232.59 1.71%1.71%1.71%
3,750 $321.0 $243.55 $326.98 $247.71 1.71%1.71%1.71%
4,000 $341.56 $258.2 $347.39 $262.83 1.71%1.71%1.71%
4,250 $361.63 $273.28 $367.80 $277.95 1.71%1.71%1.71%
4,500 $381.69 $288.15 $388.20 $293.0 1.71%1.71%1.71%
4,750 $401.75 $303.G $408.61 $308.19 1.71%1.71%1.71%
5,000 $421.1 $317.88 $429.01 $323.31 1.71%1.71%1.71%
Note:
Includes Cutomer Effciency Servces Rate Adjustment.
Ro
c
k
y

M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n

P
o
w
e
r
St
a
t
e

o
f

I
d
a
h
o
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
l
i
n
g

C
o
m
p
a
n
s
o
n
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e

3
6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l

S
e
r
v
c
e
-
O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l

T
i
m
e

o
f

D
a
y
Mo
n
t
h
l
y

B
i
D
i
n
g
Pr
e
s
e
n
t

P
n
c
e
s

1
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d

P
n
c
e
s

2
Do
l
l
a
r

C
h
a
n
g
e
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

C
h
a
n
g
e
kW
h
Su
m
m
e
i
.
Wi
n
t
e
r
4
Su
m
m
e
r
*
Wi
n
t
e
r
*
*
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
Su
m
m
e
r
Wi
n
t
e
r
0
$1
3
.
6
6
$1
3
.
6
6
$1
4
.
1
4
$1
4
.
1
4
$0
.
4
8
$0
.
4
8
3.
4
9
%
3.
4
9
%
50
$1
7
.
2
5
$1
6
.
7
3
$1
7
.
8
5
$1
7
.
3
1
$0
.
6
0
$0
.
5
9
3.
5
0
%
3.
5
0
%
10
0
$2
0
.
8
3
$1
9
.
8
0
$2
1
.
7
$2
0
.
4
9
$0
.
7
3
$0
.
6
9
3.
5
1
%
3.
5
1
%
15
0
$2
4
.
4
2
$2
2
.
8
7
$2
5
.
2
8
$2
3
.
6
7
$0
.
8
6
$0
.
8
0
3.
5
2
%
3.
5
2
%
20
0
$2
8
.
0
1
$2
5
.
9
4
$2
8
.
9
9
$2
6
.
8
5
$0
.
9
9
$0
.
9
1
3.
5
2
%
3.
5
2
%
30
0
$3
5
.
1
8
$3
2
.
0
7
$3
6
.
2
$3
3
.
2
0
$1
.
2
4
$1
.
3
3.
5
3
%
3.
5
3
%
40
0
$4
2
.
3
6
$3
8
.
2
1
$4
3
.
8
5
$3
9
.
5
6
$1
.
5
0
$1
.
5
3.
5
3
%
3.
5
3
%
50
0
$4
9
.
5
3
$4
4
.
3
5
$5
1
.
2
8
$4
5
.
9
2
$1
.
7
5
$1
.
7
3.
5
3
%
3.
5
3
%
60
0
$5
6
.
7
1
$5
0
.
4
9
$5
8
.
7
1
$5
2
.
2
7
$2
.
0
0
$1
.
7
8
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
3
%
70
0
$6
3
.
8
8
$5
6
.
2
$6
6
.
1
4
$5
8
.
6
3
$2
.
2
6
$2
.
0
0
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
80
0
$7
1
.
0
5
$6
2
.
7
6
$7
3
.
5
7
$6
4
.
9
8
$2
.
5
1
$2
.
2
2
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
90
0
$7
8
.
2
3
$6
8
.
9
0
$8
1
.
0
0
$7
1
.
4
$2
.
7
7
$2
.
4
4
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
0
0
0
$8
5
.
4
0
$7
5
.
0
4
$8
8
.
3
$7
7
.
6
9
$3
.
0
2
$2
.
6
6
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
1
0
0
$9
2
.
5
8
$8
1
.
7
$9
5
.
8
5
$8
4
.
0
5
$3
.
2
8
$2
.
8
7
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
2
0
0
$9
9
.
7
5
$8
7
.
3
1
$1
0
3
.
2
8
$9
0
.
4
0
$3
.
5
3
$3
.
0
9
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
4
0
0
$1
1
4
.
1
0
$9
9
.
5
9
$1
1
8
.
1
4
$1
0
3
.
1
2
$4
.
0
4
$3
.
5
3
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
6
0
0
$1
2
8
.
4
5
$1
1
1
.
8
6
$1
3
3
.
0
0
$1
1
5
.
8
3
$4
.
5
5
$3
.
9
6
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
1,
8
0
0
$1
4
2
.
8
0
$1
2
4
.
1
4
$1
4
7
.
8
6
$1
2
8
.
5
4
$5
.
0
6
$4
.
4
0
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
2,
0
0
0
$1
5
7
.
1
5
$1
3
6
.
4
1
$1
6
2
.
7
1
$1
4
1
.
2
5
$5
.
5
7
$4
.
8
3
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
2,
2
0
0
$1
7
1
4
9
$1
4
8
.
6
9
$1
7
7
.
5
7
$1
5
3
.
9
6
$6
.
0
8
$5
.
2
7
3.
5
4
%
3.
5
4
%
No
t
e
s
:
1.

h
i
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
e

3
4
.
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
i
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
l
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
n
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
c
e
s

R
a
t
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
2.

h
i
c
l
u
d
e
s

c
u
r
e
n
t

S
c
h
e
d
u
e

3
4
.
B
P
A

C
r
e
d
t

w
h
i
c
h

e
q
u
a
l
s

z
e
r
o

a
n
d

C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r

E
f
f
c
i
e
n
c
y

S
e
r
v
c
e
s

R
a
e

A
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
.
3.

B
i
l
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

4
4
%
-
5
6
%

o
n
-
p
e
a
k

t
o

o
f
f
-
p
e
a
k

r
a
t
i
o

i
n

t
h
e

s
u
m
e
r
4.

B
i
l
s

a
r
e

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

4
2
%
-
5
8
%

o
n
-
p
e
a
k

t
o

o
f
f
-
p
e
a
k

r
a
t
i
o

i
n

t
h
e

w
i
t
e
~(
"
(
!
;
o
_Q
3

9
-
0
ii
l
l

6
'

~
VI

Z
;
:
"
C
!i

0

z
S
:
c.
.

0
0
.
"
0
'

i
:
ãj

l
1

~

i
o.
r
'

"
0
5
'
~6
~

"
0
ii

c
¡

C
D

~
o
Ó

c
o

C
D
::

.
.

0

.
.
..co