HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070126Comments.pdfF~CCE;"
WELDONB. STUTZMAN
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074
(208) 334-0318
IDAHO BAR NO. 3283
ZOlJl JAii 26 Mi 8: 56
." , , .' ,, ;".:)'
P;',L,I!U ,', U!-
' !"'":":!"';":::(~
Jil l ,-'.)'-' ",r',,-,v
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W WASHINGTON
BOISE ID 83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF PACIFICORP DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN
POWER FOR APPROVAL OF AN IRRIGATION
LOAD CONTROL DISPATCH PILOT PROGRAM.
CASE NO. PAC-O6-
COMMENTS OF THE
COMMISSION STAFF
COMES NOW the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its
Attorney of record, Weldon B. Stutzman, Deputy Attorney General, and in response to the Notice
of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure issued in Order No. 30203 on January 5 2007
submits the following comments.
BACKGROUND
On December 5, 2006, PacifiCorp dba Rocky Mountain Power filed an Application
requesting approval of an Irrigation Load Control Dispatch Pilot Program. Rocky Mountain
Power currently has an Irrigation Load Control Program that rewards customers who allow the
Company to interrupt service at designated irrigation pump sites. The Company submitted an
Application for a pilot program after making presentations to Commission Staff and to members of
the Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association. The proposal is for an optional program in addition to
the Irrigation Load Control Program already in place. Rocky Mountain proposes to implement the
STAFF COMMENTS JANUARY 26, 2007
program on a limited basis during the 2007 irrigation season, making it available on a first-come
first-serve basis up to a total participation of 45 MW. At the conclusion of the 2007 season, the
Company plans to evaluate the pilot program and again seek input from participants and
Commission Staff.
STAFF REVIEW
Rocky Mountain Power is proposing a pilot program that will allow the Company to
interrupt service to Idaho irrigation customers at the Company s discretion. In return, participating
customers will receive a credit on their October billing statement for the entire irrigation season.
There are two major differences between the proposed pilot and the Company s existing Irrigation
Load Control Program. First is the ability to interrupt service at the Company s choosing rather
than on a scheduled basis. Second, the proposed Program s pricing structure is a yearly credit
rather than a monthly credit.
The Company s current Irrigation Load Control Program allows participating customers to
receive monthly credit on their bills during the irrigation season in return for agreeing to shut off
their pumps during selected peak demand hours of the day. Customers can choose from three
options for predetermined service interruption during each week of the irrigation season (June 1-
September 15). The options include: two six-hour blocks, two three-hour blocks, or four three-
hour blocks. Credits are variable depending on which option the customer chooses and the credits
also change for each month during the irrigation season. During 2006, nearly 500 customers
participated in the existing Irrigation Load Control Program resulting in approximately 360 MW
contracted for load control.
In the proposed pilot program, it is expected that a limited number of participants will be
selected, data will be collected, results will be assessed, and changes will be made as needed in
order to make the program more successful. The program can then be expanded to achieve the
desired goal. As described earlier, for the 2007 irrigation season the Company proposes to allow
eligible customers served on the Company s Schedule 10 to enroll in the program on a first-come
first-served basis, up to a total of 45 MW.
Participant eligibility for the proposed program is determined by meeting certain criteria as
outlined in the Company s Application. These requirements include: a total demand of at least
500 horsepower under the customer s control through single or multiple accounts, an integrated
pump/pivot irrigation system with a minimum pump size of 100 horsepower, and continuous
STAFF COMMENTS JANUARY 26, 2007
internet access from May 1 to September 15. In addition to the applicability requirements
program participants must agree to control their irrigation applications through two-way wireless
communication equipment specified by the Company. If the customer uses the communication
devices in excess of 70 times each month, the customer will be responsible for the additional air
time charges. It is proposed that program participants will agree to be trained to set up their
pumps, and customers must participate in all surveys and assist in program evaluation.
The proposed pilot would allow the Company to remotely dispatch interruptions by way of
a central network server maintained in Boise, Idaho, and interruptions would be at the Company
discretion. Total curtailment per participating customer will be limited to 65 hours during the
irrigation season, with dispatch events occurring between the hours of2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.
Monday through Friday. Participants will also have the ability to opt-out of individual dispatch
events, up to a limit of five occurrences during the irrigation season. If a participant opts-out of a
dispatch event more than twice during the 2007 irrigation season, the credit paid to the participant
by the Company will be reduced by the replacement cost of the energy during the dispatch event.
As proposed, the required control technology will be provided by the Company and will
allow for remote dispatch of participating sites by way of a central network server owned by M2M
Communications and maintained in Boise, Idaho. The control devices will communicate with the
network server via integrated cell phone or satellite technology, based on availability at the pump
site. In addition, the network server will communicate with customers using either cell phone or
e-mail technology, alerting customers of impending dispatch events and any status changes at the
controlled site.
Staff believes the equipment used in the application is reliable and will accurately provide
for effective irrigation applications. M2M Communications provides similar wireless
communication products to the Valmont Company, a major supplier of center pivots and utility
equipment. The equipment provided to irrigators can be upgraded so that additional irrigation
tasks can be controlled through wireless communication at the customer s expense.
Another major difference between this proposal and the current program is the pricing
structure for the credit to customers. Currently, Rocky Mountain Power s Irrigation Load Control
Program offers a credit on a per kW basis that varies by month and by service interruption time.
The proposed program includes a fixed annual credit of $11.18/kW for the year. The total load
control service credit will be the fixed annual credit multiplied by the kW load controlled. Staff
STAFF COMMENTS JANUARY 26, 2007
believes the proposed credit is reasonable and the amount is consistent with the value of credits
provided under the current load control program.
Staff believes there are some concerns with dispatchable service interruptions, especially
regarding crops that are particularly sensitive to stress from interrupted irrigation. However
individual irrigators know their equipment capabilities and soil profile best and should
thoughtfully examine how participation will affect their operation. Additionally, Staff believes the
irrigation equipment required to participate in the proposed pilot is capable of effectively
managing water application to allow for discretionary service interruption.
Customers will assume the risk of crop losses that may result from participation in the
Program or resulting from load control equipment failure. While the load control equipment is
expected to be reliable and effective, Staff believes customers should be aware of the impacts an
equipment failure might have on their business. Rocky Mountain Power should not assume
responsibility for yield reductions or crop loss to participants in this proposed program.
Staff recognizes the effectiveness of the Company s current Irrigation Load Control
Program on load shifting and believes this pilot is a worthwhile attempt to assess the practicality
and impact of a wireless dispatch load control program. The Company has taken a proactive
approach in developing load control programs that have included the input of Commission Staff
and impacted irrigators. Staff anticipates few consequences for either the Company or customers
if the program is unsuccessful, but recognizes the potential for increased load shifting benefits if
the program achieves the goals as outlined in the Company s Application.
Staff will review program results as they become available, and make recommendations to
Rocky Mountain Power for program modification if necessary.
At the conclusion of the pilot, Staff recommends the Company conduct an evaluation of the
proposed program. - The report should include the number of customers and the number of sites
participating, amount of load under control, amount of load reduction achieved, the number of
interruptions and the amount of load that failed to be interrupted when scheduled and the reason
for the failure. The report should also provide a detailed cost breakdown, with a cost-effective
analysis, an assessment of customer satisfaction, an analysis ofload control equipment, and any
recommended changes in the program. The report should provide sufficient detail to facilitate a
meaningful evaluation of the wireless interruption options for the irrigation season.
STAFF COMMENTS JANUARY 26 , 2007
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. ,Staff recommends the Commission approve Rocky Mountain Power s Application to
implement an Irrigation Load Control Dispatch Pilot Program as proposed.
Staff recommends the Commission direct the Company to prepare an evaluation report
for the Commission s review at the conclusion of the 2007 irrigation season. The
report should provide pilot program results and offer recommendations regarding the
feasibility of implementing an Irrigation Load Control Dispatch Program on a more
permanent basis.
Respectfully submitted this LID day of January 2007.
Weldon B. Stutzman
Deputy Attorney General
Technical Staff: Michael Darrington
i :umisc :commen ts/paceO6 .12wsmd
STAFF COMMENTS JANUARY 26, 2007
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY 2007
SERVED THE FOREGOING COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF, IN CASE
NO. PAC-06-, BY MAILING A COpy THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE
FOLLOWING:
DEAN BROCKBANK ESQ
ACIFICORP
DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
201 S MAIN ST STE 2200
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
BRIAN DICKMAN
P ACIFICORP
DBA ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER
201 S MAIN ST STE 2300
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111
DATA REQUEST RESPONSE CENTER
ACIFICORP
825 NE MULTNOMAH STE 2000
PORTLAND OR 97232
~~. ),(~
SECRETARY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE