HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050906Application Part I.pdfLisa D. Nordstrom (ISB No. 5733)
PacifiCorp
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 1800
Portland, OR 97232
Telephone: (503) 813-6227
FAX: (503) 813-7252
Email: lisa.nordstrom~pacificorp.com
,-- ,
~ f~
' ", " \' .;.._
/1..- \i'L,,
! ED
lzJ
'="
i'V:
, -
. 0:
. '
(Jjtjij ;)L ' H!1
!L) !\ij puBLiC
J ilL IT IES cOt/n-4!SSlON
Attorney for PacifiCorp
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF
ACIFICORP d/b/a UTAH POWER & LIGHT
COMP ANY FOR APPROVAL OF A NEW DSM
COS T RECOVERY MECHANISM AND
ENHANCED ENERGY EFFICIENCY
PROGRAMS FOR COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL, AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
CASE NO. PAC-05-
APPLI CA TI ON
COMES NOW, PacifiCorp, d/b/a Utah Power & Light Company ("PacifiCorp" or
the "Company ), and in accordance with RP 052 and RP 201 et. seq.hereby applies to
the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the "Commission ) for approval of a new
demand-side management ("DSM") cost recovery mechanism, deferred accounting for
DSM expenditures incurred on or after the service date of the Commission s Order
approving this Application, and several new or enhanced energy efficiency programs for
PacifiCorp s commercial, industrial, agricultural and residential customers. PacifiCorp
proposes that the new DSM cost recovery mechanism be implemented through a new
Schedule, 191 , that provides for a line item charge entitled Customer Efficiency Services
to be included on customer bills beginning January 1 2006. The enhanced energy
efficiency programs, which are optional for retail customers, offer program-specific
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP -
combinations of information and cash incentives to help customers install energy
efficient equipment or make permanent operational changes to reduce energy
consumption and save money. To administer these programs, the Company seeks to add
new Schedules No. 115, 117, 125, 155 , and seeks administrative changes to Schedules
120, and 122 of its Tariff LP.C. No. 28. The Company requests to begin program
implementation on November 15, 2005 or the date of Commission approval, whichever is
later. PacifiCorp proposes that Schedule 191 have a January 1 2006 effective date.
In support of its Application, PacifiCorp states:
PacifiCorp is an electrical corporation and public utility in the state of
Idaho and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission with regard to its public utility
operations. PacifiCorp also provides retail electric service in the states of Utah, Oregon
Wyoming, Washington, and California.
This Application is filed pursuant Idaho Code ~~ 61-301
, -
307
, -
622, and
623. In particular, Idaho Code ~ 61-623 empowers the Commission to determine the
propriety of proposed rate schedules, ~~ 61-307 and -622 require Commission approval
prior to any increase in rates, and ~ 61-301 requires Idaho retail electric rates to be just
and reasonable.
This Application is filed in compliance with Customer Information Rule
102 (IDAPA 31.21.02.102). Notices of the proposed rate change will be included with
bills starting the week of September 5 2005 and will continue until all bills have been
sent with a notice. The Company estimates this will take approximately 30 days from
date of filing. See Attachment 3 for bill message text and the press release.
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 2
BACKGROUND
PacifiCorp has historically offered a variety of demand-side management
programs to its customers. For example, in July 1990 the Commission authorized the
current commercial and industrial program for business customers in Order No. 23199.
Utilizing Schedules 120 and 122, this program has been operational for approximately
years. To address the needs of low income residential customers, the Commission
approved the Low Income Weatherization program in Order No. 22333 issued on
February 10, 1989. Twenty-eight (28) business customers acted upon program-provided
information and completed projects since 1990, though the vast majority elected to pay
for or finance the improvements outside the program loan offering. The Low Income
Weatherization program has weatherized 561 dwellings since 1990. While these results
have benefited participants and helped to control system costs, market experience
indicates that new program introductions and proposed program enhancements will likely
increase Idaho participation. Increased participation will allow more PacifiCorp
customers to benefit from energy savings and simultaneously help control system energy
costs.
Current cost recovery for PacifiCorp DSM expenditures was authorized by
Order No. 22299 issued in January 1989 in Case No. U-1500-165. Order Nos. 22299
and 22758 established the capitalization of demand-side resource costs and the use of a
carrYing charge. The Company has deferred DSM costs and amortized DSM
expenditures over the useful lives of the measures. While this cost recovery mechanism
has been adequate for historic levels of participation and expenditures, the associated
regulatory lag for recovery of prudently incurred DSM expenditures has made it
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 3
financially difficult for the Company to improve existing DSM programs or implement
new ones. Moreover, minimal customer awareness ofDSM investments exists when the
expenditures are amortized and included in general rates. In addition to removing a
Company financial disincentive for increased DSM activity, the proposed recovery
mechanism would increase customer awareness of DSM investments and help increase
participation in the new and enhanced programs. Finally, the Company s proposed DSM
cost recovery mechanism is generally consistent with the recovery methodologies
approved for Idaho Power and Avista in the state of Idaho.
DESCRIPTION OF NEW DSM PROGRAMS
Schedule 191 New Tariff- "Customer Efficiency Services
The Company proposes to establish a DSM balancing account, defer all DSM
program investments made on or after the service date of the Commission s Order
approving the Application, and account for them in the DSM balancing account. The
DSM balancing account would be offset by revenue collected through a newly
established surcharge mechanism and referenced as a new line item on the bills of
PacifiCorp retail electricity users effective January 1 2006. In addition to DSM program
expenses, the proposed DSM balancing account would calculate reciprocal carrYing
charges to be added or credited to the balance. PacifiCorp proposes the carrying charges
be set at the current Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) rate.
Expenses posted to the DSM balancing account will be subject to applicable prudency
review for DSM investments. Costs and carrYing charges included in the DSM balancing
account would not be included in the calculation of Company revenue requirements for a
general rate case. Additionally, PacifiCorp proposes that DSM investments made prior to
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 4
the service date of the Commission s Order approving this Application continue to be
recovered through general rates until fully amortized. Current and proposed DSM
accounting is shown in Attachment
The Company proposes to label the line item charge Customer Efficiency
Services - on the customer bill and in the Description section of Schedule 191. The line
item surcharge will be calculated as a percentage of the base charges before the
application of Schedule 34, the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and
Conservation Act Residential and Farm Kilowatt-Hour Credit (also known as "BPA
Credits ), because these credits vary by year and by rate schedule and are available
primarily for agricultural and selected non-irrigation customers. All customer groups will
have access to programs funded directly through Schedule 191 or through the Northwest
Efficiency Alliance, thus delivering a system benefit in addition to participant benefits.
Because all customer groups will benefit and calculation of the surcharge in a manner
other than that described above increases billing system complexity, the Company does
not feel additional collection metrics for any customer or customer group is necessary.
The amount collected would be set based on a forecast of Commission-approved
DSM program investments. The Company will review balancing account activity on an
annual basis and adjust it based on the account balance and the forecast activity of the
approved programs. The Company is forecasting initial expenditures for the balance of
calendar year 2005 through calendar 2006 and proposes the initial annual review be
completed after January 1 2007 to coincide with the first full year of Schedule 191
collections. The annual review and recommendation for a change (if any) in the
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 5
collection rate would be completed within 60 days of the end of the fiscal year, with the
first such review being completed no later than March 1 , 2007.
The objective of the line item surcharge will be to set a collection rate projected to
result in a zero balance in the DSM balancing account by the following review period.
PacifiCorp intends to provide the Commission quarterly reports on the account's activity.
The Company proposes to set the rate to initially collect approximately $1 825 000 --
approximately 1.5% of retail revenue based on rates in effect after September 16 2005.
Any future changes to the collection rate will be filed by PacifiCorp for Commission
approval prior to implementation and will not occur automatically.
Schedule 155 New Tariff-Irrigation Efficiency
PacifiCorp proposes to initiate a comprehensive Irrigation Efficiency program
that will offer no-cost equipment exchange, equipment testing and incentives for energy
efficiency measures installed. This program will complement the Company s load
control offering and increase services available to irrigation customers. The Irrigation
Efficiency program will include the following components: nozzle exchange, prescriptive
incentives for certain pivot equipment, pump check and water management consultation
and a pump testing and system analysis. In addition to energy and water savings from
nozzles replacement, pivot measures and improved equipment operation resulting from
the water management consultation, the Irrigation Efficiency program will offer program-
funded energy engineering services and incentives for properly installed energy
efficiency measures such as pump repairs and system upgrades.
To simplify marketing and delivery, all energy efficiency services and incentives
for Schedule 10 irrigation customers will be included in this new schedule. The overall
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 6
program is designed to be delivered by a third party program administrator under contract
with the Company. The program cost and savings estimates in Attachment 1 - Table 1
are based on the most current assessment of program savings and implementation costs.
The Company is finalizing the program design and anticipates the final program will be
delivered with substantially the same features and program performance as described
herein. Based upon the cost-effectiveness analysis summarized in Attachment 1 - Table
, the initial program design is projected to be cost-effective.
Schedule 115 New Tariff FinAnswer Express
The proposed FinAnswer Express program (FE) is based on the successful
program of the same name operating in the Utah and Washington markets. The FE
program provides prescriptive incentives for common energy efficiency measures (EEM)
with minimal transaction complexity. EEM categories include efficient lighting,
premium motors, and mechanical upgrades associated with heating and cooling. Both
new construction and retrofit projects are eligible for the FinAnswer Express program
which would be available to commercial and industrial customers on the majority of
Idaho rate schedules.
The incentives are based on the equipment installed, i.e. per fixture or per
horsepower (HP) or per ton. The program also provides a custom incentive calculation
for measures not listed on the prescriptive incentive tables. Experience in other markets
has shown the program to be popular with trade allies, i., equipment distributors and
installing contractors that sell standard and high efficiency equipment to customers. The
Company is considering proposals for sales support functions designed to assist these
equipment distributors and contractors in their sales and installation of high efficiency
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 7
equipment. These services would be similar to the services currently provided in the
Utah and Washington markets. Additional program details are contained in Attachment
4 and cost effectiveness results are summarized in Table 2 - Attachment
Schedule 117 New Tariff-Refrigerator Recycling
The proposed residential Refrigerator Recycling program is similar to the
successful Utah program operated as "See Ya Later Refrigerator . The program will
offer an incentive to residential customers and landlords to permanently discontinue use
of their second refrigerators and freezers, and/or replace their primary refrigerators and
freezers with new, more energy efficient models. Interested customers will be directed to
call a toll free number to schedule a pick-up time. All appliances collected will be
recycled so they are not placed back in use through secondary market sales. All recycling
processors will meet current local and EP A guidelines. PacifiCorp anticipates that the
program will be administered by the same vendor delivering this PacifiCorp program in
Utah. The program is projected to be cost-effective as summarized in Attachment 1 -
Table 2.
DESCRIPTION OF REVISED PROGRAMS
Schedule 21 Revisions Low Income Weatherization Services
PacifiCorp s current low income weatherization program has been in place for
approximately 15 years. It provides rebates to two local non-profit agencies (i., Eastern
Idaho Special Services Agency and SouthEastern Idaho Community Action Agency) for
weatherization services they complete in electrically heated homes. The proposed
changes were determined through discussions with staff from these two partnering
agencies and the Community Action Partnership Association of Idaho during the 2005
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 8
general rate case. The revisions are intended to increase customer participation and
available incentives for the installation of additional cost effective measures. Proposed
revisions include: 1) increasing the available annual program ftn1ding up to $150 000
annually, 2) increasing rebates from a maximum of $1 ,000 per home to an average annual
rebate of $1 500 per weatherized home, 3) increasing agency administrative cost
reimbursement from $150 per completed home to 15% ofPacifiCorp s rebate on installed
measures with set maximums, and 4) expanding available program delivery incentives by
providing a rebate to our partnering agencies of 50% of the costs associated with
additional measures installed in homes regardless of heating source -- including compact
fluorescent light bulbs, replacement refrigerators and water heater measures in homes
with electric water heaters. Additionally, to promote the installation of efficiency
measures that have become cost-effective in the last decade, incentives will be offered for
homes in which services were provided under this tariff prior to October 1 , 1993 , once
per individual measure and up to two times per dwelling. The Company will evaluate
Schedule 21 program activities within two years of the Commission s approval of these
proposed revisions to determine if further revisions are warranted.
The program is cost-effective from a Utility Cost Test basis; See Attachment 1 -
Table 2 for a summary of cost effectiveness results and Attachment 4 for more details.
10.Schedules 120/122 Revisions -- Commercial Energy Services
This filing proposes that Schedules 120 and 122 be closed to new service, but that
they remain as approved schedules to assist in the administration of the few remaining
loans originated under the schedules. When the loans are re-paid, PacifiCorp will seek
Commission approval to cancel these schedules in a separate tariff filing.
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 9
11.Schedule 125 New Tariff-Energy FinAnswer
The Energy FinAnswer program has been operational in Idaho as a loan-based
energy efficiency program for approximately 15 years and this filing is a revision of an
existing program. The current program is covered by existing Schedules 120 and 122
and provides program-funded energy engineering and loans to business customers.
PacifiCorp proposes to continue the Company-funded energy engineering and add an
incentive offer of$0.12 for first year energy savings (kWh) and $50 per average monthly
demand savings (kW) occurring during the peak periods specified in the customer s rate
schedule, up to 50% of the approved project costs. To increase participation, the
incentive offer will replace the loan offer (which will be discontinued). This incentive
offer and level is the same as that offered by PacifiCorp in Utah. As described above
Schedules 120 and 122 will be amended to manage the administration of existing loans.
All new program services will be offered under a new Schedule, 125 , and will include
various enhancements to increase new construction participation and early program
involvement to capture lost opportunities. It will also require minimum savings above
code and preclude incentives for fuel switching. PacifiCorp will make the incentive offer
after the Company-funded or approved engineering analysis is complete and prior to
customer equipment purchases. The incentive is to be paid as a single payment by
Company check. For more details on the program, see Attachment 4. The projected
cost-effectiveness of the Energy FinAnswer program is outlined in Attachment 1 - Table
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP - 10
TARIFFS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
12.Attachment 1 to this Application contains PacifiCorp s forecasted program
expenditures, a summary of cost effective analysis results, Table A revised to show
proposed Schedule 191 collections and a chart showing current and proposed DSM
accounting. Attachment 2 contains PacifiCorp s new proposed Electric Service
Schedules 115, 117, 125, 155, and 191 , and amended Electric Service Schedules 21 , 120
and 122 in both clean and legislative formats. Attachment 3 contains Customer Rule 102
implementation information, including the bill message and the press release.
Attachment 4 contains program descriptions, evaluation plans and cost effective analyses
for the FinAnswer Express, Energy FinAnswer, Irrigation Efficiency, Refrigerator
Recycling and Low Income Weatherization programs. Attachment 5 contains market
characterizations for the FinAnswer Express, Energy FinAnswer and Irrigation Efficiency
programs.
MODIFIED PROCEDURE
13.PacifiCorp believes that consideration of the proposals contained in this
Application does not require an evidentiary proceeding, and accordingly the Company
requests that this Application be processed under RP 201 allowing for consideration of
issues under modified procedure, i., by written submissions rather than by an
evidentiary hearing.
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP -
SERVICE OF PLEADINGS
14.Communications regarding this Application should be addressed to:
Bob Lively
PacifiCorp
201 South Main Street, Suite 2300
Salt Lake City, UT 84140
Telephone: (801) 220-4052
Facsimile: (801) 220-3116
E-mail: bob.lively~pacificorp.com
Lisa Nordstrom
PacifiCorp Office of the General Counsel
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 1800
Portland, OR 97232
Telephone: (503) 813-6227
Facsimile: (503) 813-7252
E-mail: lisa.nordstrom~pacificorp. com
In addition, PacifiCorp respectfully requests that all data requests regarding this
matter be addressed to:
Bye-mail (preferred):datarequest~pacificorp. co
By regular mail:Data Request Response Center
PacifiCorp
825 NE Multnomah, Suite 800
Portland, OR 97232
By facsimile:(503) 813-6060
Informal inquires also may be directed to Bob Lively at (801) 220-4052.
CONCLUSION
NOW, THEREFORE, PacifiCorp respectfully requests that the Commission issue
its Order under Modified Procedure approving new DSM tariff schedules (Nos. 115, 117
125 155, and 191), revising existing tariff schedules (Nos. 120, 122 and 21), and
authorizing PacifiCorp to defer accounting ofDSM expenditures incurred on or after the
service date of the Commission s Order approving this Application as described herein.
APPLICATION OF PACIFICORP - 12
DATED this 2nd day of September 2005.
APPLICATION OF P ACIFICORP -
Respectfully submitted
~!trtC~
Attorney for PacifiCorp
ATTACHMENT
(PacifiCorp s forecasted program expenditures, a summary of cost effective analysis results, Table A
revised to show proposed Schedule 191 collections and a chart showing current and proposed DSM
accounting. )
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
T
a
b
l
e
No
v
1
2
0
0
5
t
o
D
e
c
3
1
,
2
0
0
6
Ye
a
r
2
Ye
a
r
3
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
Ty
p
e
De
l
i
v
e
r
y
Du
r
a
t
i
o
n
Mw
a
Mw
a
Mw
a
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Ne
w
Th
i
r
d
p
a
r
t
y
25
y
e
a
r
s
72
0
,
22
9
56
7
95
0
En
e
r
g
y
Fi
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
-
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
En
h
a
n
c
e
d
Co
m
p
a
n
y
on
-
go
i
n
Q
61
3
,
00
0
$
1
79
8
00
0
0.
4
9
$
2
38
2
00
0
61
2
Fi
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
Co
m
p
a
n
y
+
Ex
p
r
e
s
s
Ne
w
ou
t
s
o
u
r
c
e
on
-
go
i
n
g
17
6
,
43
5
17
0
,
25
7
17
0
,
30
9
Th
i
r
d
p
a
r
t
y
-
Se
e
V
a
L
a
t
e
r
Ne
w
JA
C
O
2
y
e
a
r
s
25
8
,
38
7
25
8
,
38
7
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Lo
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
Ac
t
i
o
n
We
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
En
h
a
n
c
e
d
Ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
on
-
go
i
n
Q
15
6
,
58
5
17
6
,
58
5
15
6
,
58
5
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
L
o
a
d
KT
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
&
co
n
t
r
o
l
*
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Co
m
p
a
n
y
on
-
Qo
i
n
Q
37
0
,
00
0
37
0
,
00
0
37
0
,
00
0
NW
E
n
e
r
g
y
Ma
r
k
e
t
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Tr
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Al
l
i
a
n
c
e
on
-
Qo
i
n
Q
25
3
,
00
0
0.
4
4
21
0
00
0
0.
4
4
21
0
,
00
0
0.
4
4
To
t
a
l
s
$
2
,
54
7
,
63
6
50
.
$
3
,
55
1
,
17
9
50
.
$
3
,
28
8
,
89
4
50
.
%
o
f
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
*
*
As
%
o
f
1
4
m
o
n
t
h
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
1
.
*
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
$
8
5
0
,
00
0
o
f
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
c
r
e
d
i
t
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
i
n
p
o
w
e
r
c
o
s
t
s
.
P
a
r
t
i
c
p
a
t
i
o
n
c
r
e
d
i
t
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
o
n
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
e
n
r
o
l
l
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
a
v
o
i
d
e
d
k
W
.
**
B
a
s
e
d
o
n
T
a
b
l
e
A
a
n
d
$
1
2
1
87
8
00
0
i
n
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
l
e
s
s
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
)
In
i
t
i
a
l
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
r
a
t
e
s
e
t
b
e
l
o
w
1
4
m
o
n
t
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
e
x
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
p
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
r
i
o
r
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
r
a
m
p
u
p
t
i
m
e
s
i
n
n
e
\
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
Ta
b
l
e
1
0
8
3
0
0
5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
Ta
b
l
e
2
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
c
o
s
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
TR
C
+
Li
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
T
e
s
t
Ra
t
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
C
o
s
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
ad
d
e
r
TR
C
(
n
o
a
d
d
e
r
)
(U
C
T
)
Te
s
t
(
R
I
M
)
te
s
t
(
P
C
T
)
($
/
k
w
h
)
Lo
a
d
f
a
c
t
o
r
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
22
4
11
3
38
3
81
1
00
0
0
2
1
6
4
9
24
%
En
e
r
g
y
F
i
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
59
4
1
.
4
4
9
73
8
51
2
00
0
0
8
3
0
0
5
9
65
%
Fi
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
54
4
1
.
4
0
4
03
2
64
9
85
7
00
0
0
1
7
0
8
8
6
51
%
Re
f
r
i
g
e
r
a
t
o
r
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
83
7
57
9
73
9
69
6
n/
a
00
0
0
1
1
4
9
4
5
65
%
Lo
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
93
6
85
1
06
3
54
4
n/
a
00
0
0
0
3
9
0
5
9
65
%
20
0
4
I
R
P
-
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
0
5
up
d
a
t
e
d
e
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
v
a
l
u
e
s
TR
C
+
Li
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
T
e
s
t
Ra
t
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
C
o
s
t
Re
v
e
n
u
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
ad
d
e
r
TR
C
(
n
o
a
d
d
e
r
)
(U
C
T
)
Te
s
t
(
R
I
M
)
te
s
t
(
P
C
T
)
($
/
k
w
h
)
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
35
4
23
1
53
8
80
1
81
1
00
0
0
1
5
4
1
3
En
e
r
g
y
F
i
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
93
2
75
6
90
8
90
2
51
2
00
0
0
1
5
8
6
1
0
Fi
n
A
n
s
w
e
r
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
62
4
1
.
4
7
7
14
7
68
6
85
7
00
0
0
0
7
8
4
8
4
Re
f
r
i
g
e
r
a
t
o
r
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
67
4
26
9
90
9
n/
a
00
0
0
0
3
4
5
9
1
Lo
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
34
2
1.
4
7
4
75
5
n/
a
00
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
1
Ju
n
e
30
,
20
0
5
F
o
r
w
a
r
d
P
r
i
c
e
C
u
r
v
e
s
-
B
a
s
e
C
a
s
e
TA
B
L
E
A
B
Y
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
UT
A
H
P
O
W
E
R
&
L
I
G
H
T
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
PR
E
S
E
N
T
R
E
V
E
N
U
E
S
FR
O
M
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
S
A
L
E
S
T
O
U
L
T
I
M
A
T
E
C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R
S
DI
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
E
D
B
Y
R
A
T
E
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S
I
N
I
D
A
H
O
NO
R
M
A
L
I
Z
E
D
1
2
M
O
N
T
H
S
E
N
D
E
D
M
A
R
C
H
2
0
0
4
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
$
0
0
0
)
Av
e
r
a
g
e
Li
n
e
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
Sc
h
.
No
.
o
f
MW
h
Ba
s
e
Sc
h
1
9
1
Sc
h
.
Ne
t
No
.
No
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
No
.
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
(O
O
O
'
Re
v
.
Re
v
Cr
e
d
i
t
Re
v
.
(1
)
(2
)
(3
)
(4
)
(5
)
(6
)
(7
)
(8
)
(9
)
(1
0
)
(6
)
+
(
7
)
+
(
8
)
+
(
9
)
44
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
17
3
30
6
32
1
25
,
65
9
$3
8
5
1.5
0
%
($
5
,
88
6
)
$2
0
,
15
8
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l
T
O
D
15
,
99
6
29
9
,
98
4
20
,
25
6
$3
0
4
1.5
0
%
($
5
,
76
4
)
$1
4
,
79
6
AG
A
-
Re
v
e
n
u
e
To
t
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
48
,
16
8
60
6
,
30
4
$4
5
,
91
9
$6
8
9
1.5
0
%
($
1
1
65
0
)
$3
4
95
8
44
2
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
&
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
L
a
r
g
e
P
o
w
e
r
98
3
29
8
,
20
4
17
,
64
6
$2
6
5
1.5
0
%
$1
7
,
91
1
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
v
c
.
-
L
g
.
P
o
w
e
r
(
R
&
F
)
23
5
29
,
33
9
96
2
$2
9
1.5
0
%
($
5
6
4
)
42
7
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
M
e
d
.
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
64
8
17
1
1.5
0
%
$1
7
4
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
H
i
g
h
V
o
l
t
a
g
e
87
,
74
9
13
0
$6
2
1.5
0
%
19
2
Ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
57
8
67
4
,
12
4
41
,
53
2
$6
2
3
1.5
0
%
($
1
6
,
60
0
)
$2
5
,
55
5
Co
r
o
m
.
&
I
n
d
.
S
p
a
c
e
H
e
a
t
i
n
g
32
6
28
1
80
6
$1
2
1.5
0
%
$8
1
8
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
14
0
96
,
60
5
88
0
$1
1
8
1.5
0
%
$7
,
99
8
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
(
R
&
F
)
23
A
32
1
15
,
93
1
40
6
$2
1
1.
5
0
%
($
3
0
6
)
$1
,
12
1
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
O
p
t
i
o
n
a
l
T
O
D
72
1
10
2
1.
5
0
%
$1
0
4
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
55
6
,
4
4
9
$4
6
,
98
6
$4
6
,
98
6
AG
A
-
Re
v
e
n
u
e
$2
5
0
$2
5
0
To
t
a
l
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
&
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
60
3
77
4
05
2
$1
2
2
,
87
2
13
5
92
%
($
1
7
,
47
0
)
$1
0
6
,
53
7
To
t
a
l
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
&
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
(
E
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
)
60
1
21
7
,
60
3
$7
5
,
88
6
$1
,
13
5
1.
5
0
%
($
1
7
,
47
0
)
$5
9
,
55
1
44
4
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
t
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Se
c
u
r
i
t
y
A
r
e
a
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
24
3
29
6
$6
2
1.
5
0
%
$6
3
Se
c
u
r
i
t
y
A
r
e
a
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
R
&
F
)
16
5
12
2
1.
5
0
%
($
2
)
$2
6
Str
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
-
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
12
7
1.
5
0
%
$2
9
St
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
-
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
21
9
85
4
18
9
1.
5
0
%
$1
9
2
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
24
5
1.
5
0
%
$2
0
AG
A
-
Re
v
e
n
u
e
($
2
)
($
2
)
To
t
a
l
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
t
r
e
e
t
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
67
9
64
4
$3
2
6
1.
2
3
%
($
2
)
$3
2
8
To
t
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
t
o
U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
61
,
45
1
38
3
,
00
1
$1
6
9
,
11
7
82
8
1.
0
8
%
($
2
9
,
12
2
)
$1
4
1
82
3
To
t
a
l
S
a
l
e
s
t
o
U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
(
E
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
&
A
G
A
)
44
9
82
6
,
55
1
$1
2
1
,
87
8
$1
,
82
8
1.
5
0
%
($
2
9
,
12
2
)
$9
4
83
7
No
t
e
1
:
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
B
a
s
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
R
M
A
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
R
M
A
r
a
t
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
b
e
c
a
m
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
n
J
u
n
e
8
,
2
0
0
4
,
p
l
u
s
$
5
.
75
M
S
t
i
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
.
Collection of
program costs Amortization I
Fixed asset by
state (10) for
program EX
102508 life of
measure
amortization
straight line
G/L#553400
Amort of OSM
assets
(908.
In rate basePayment of
program costs
Internal Order I Settle(nentcharged to cost
elements, 530190, ICR I DRDR I 545150, etc.
Cash
G/L Account
DSM cost
recovery prior to
Commission
approval date
-------------
DSM cost
recovery post
Commission
approval date
Collection of
Droaram costs
remains the same
Fixed Asset
EX: 102582
No Amortization
See note
---..................------ --- --- --- - - -- --
i Balancing Account!Summary !
i Prepared monthly i
! by Regulatory !
! accountingL__nn__.,-____n___n_
Balancing account I
asset for tariff rider
recovery
182.
Collection of tariff
rider
Manual journal
entry - monthly
Cash
General business
G/L account
revenues (4401
442)
G/L #301 xxx
G/L 553405
Amort of 10 OSM
(908.
Not in rate base
Note: Each calendar year, new assets will be created and settlement rules on orders will be changed to settle to
the new assets. Going forward these assets will be set-up to not generate amorization and the tariff rider
balancing account asset will remain as the collector account.
ATTACHMENT 2
(PacifiCorp s new proposed Electric Service Schedules 115, 117, 125, 155, and 191 , and amended Electric
Service Schedules 21 , 120, and 122 in both clean and legislative formats):
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.Schedule 21
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.Schedule 21
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.3 Schedule 21
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.4 Schedule 21
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.Schedule 21
Original Sheet No. 21.Schedule 21
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.3 Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.4 Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Original Sheet No. 115.Schedule 115
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For QualifYing Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For Qualifying Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For Qualifying Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For QualifYing Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For QualifYing Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For QualifYing Customers
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
Qualifying Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
Qualifying Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
Original Sheet No. 117.
Original Sheet No. 117.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 125.3
Original Sheet No. 125.4
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 125.
Original Sheet No. 155.
Original Sheet No. 155.
Original Sheet No. 155.3
Original Sheet No. 155.4
Original Sheet No. 155.
Original Sheet No. 155.
Original Sheet No. 155,
Original Sheet No. 191.1
Schedule 11
Schedule 11
Schedule 120
Schedule 120
Schedule 122
Schedule 122
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 125
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 155
Schedule 191
QualifYing Customers
Residential Refrigerator Recycling
Program
Residential Refrigerator Recycling
Pro gram
Commercial Energy Services Optional
To QualifYing Customers
Commercial Energy Services Optional
To QualifYing Customers
Commercial Energy Services Optional
To QualifYing Customers
Commercial Energy Services Optional
To Qualifying Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
Qualifying Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Commercial and Industrial Energy
Efficiency Incentives Optional for
QualifYing Customers
Optional for QualifYing Customers
Optional for Qualifying Customers
Optional for Qualifying Customers
Optional for Qualifying Customers
Optional for Qualifying Customers
Optional for QualifYing Customers
Optional for Qualifying Customers
Customer Efficiency Services Adjustment
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.1
Canceling Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21
STATE OF IDAHO
Residential Energy Efficiency Rider
Optional For Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization of the
electricity requirements of existing residential dwellings inhabited by customers that meet income
guidelines through the installation of energy efficient materials. The decision to extend service under this
schedule shall be based upon the eligibility requirements contained herein.
AVAILABILITY: This tariff is applicable to residential customers in all territory served by the
Company in the state of Idaho.
ENERGY CONSERVATION SERVICE TO LOW INCOME CUSTOMERS:
This program is available to existing single family and multi-family residential units. It is
intended to reduce the electricity requirements and increase the penetration of weatherization and
efficiency measures in residential dwellings inhabited by low income households through the
installation of permanent energy efficiency materials. The decision to extend service under this
schedule shall be based on eligibility requirements contained herein.
Definitions:
Dwelling" is real or personal property within the state inhabited as the principal
residence of a dwelling owner or a tenant. "Dwelling" includes a manufactured
home, a single-family home, duplex or multi-unit residential housing. "Dwelling
does not include a recreational vehicle.
Duplexes and fourplexes are eligible if at least one half of the dwelling is
occupied by low income tenants.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
BlahOIA.,
C. No. 28
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.
Canceling Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - (Continued)
Definitions (Continued):b. Triplexes and multi-family dwellings are eligible if at least 66% of the units
are occupied by low income tenants.
Agency" means a non-profit group, Municipality or County authorized to receive
funds for installation of energy efficiency materials in low income properties.
Low Income" means households qualifying under the federal low Income
guidelines and certified for eligibility according to agency procedure. Income
eligibility is based on 125% of federal poverty guidelines.
Major Measure" means ceiling insulation, wall insulation, floor insulation and
window replacements applicable in dwellings with permanently installed electric
space heating systems. When cost-effective, all major measures must be installed
or in place or financial assistance under this schedule will not be offered. If
physical barriers exist that prohibit the installation of a measure, then the measure is
not required as a condition for financial assistance under this schedule.
Supplemental Measures and Additional Measures" are not required measures
under this schedule, but may qualify for a Company reimbursement.
Financial Assistance:
1. The Company will reimburse Agency up to an average of $1,400 per home annually on
weatherized dwellings where at least one Major Measure is installed. Reimbursements
on weatherized homes will be provided one time only on any individual measure, and
up to two times per dwelling. An incentive will be provided a second time only on
dwellings originally treated before October 1 , 1993.
In addition to the above reimbursements, Company will reimburse Agency 50% of the
cost of replacing a refrigerator plus $25 per refrigerator tested. Company will also
reimburse Agency 50% of CFL and water saving measure costs installed in homes that
do not receive at least one Major Measure.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
R lJUM
C. No. 28
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.3
Canceling Sixth Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - (Continued)
Financial Assistance (Continued):
The Company will reimburse Agency for administrative costs based on 15% of
Utah Power s rebate on installed measures, not to exceed the following total
administrative payment per building:
Dwelling Units in Building
1 to 4
5 to 10
11 to 15
16 to 20
21 to 25
26 to 30
31+
Maximum UP&L Administrative Payment
$350
$800
$1200
$1400
$1600
$1800
$2100
The minimum reimbursement will be $150 on homes with one or more Major Measure
installed and $50 on homes without the installation of a Major Measure.
Agencies must invoice Company within sixty days of job completion.
Energy Conservation Measures
Financial assistance will be provided based on the results of a cost effective analysis
through a Department of Energy approved energy audit. The energy efficient measures
eligible for funding must be installed in dwellings with permanently installed operable
electric space heat except where noted. The energy efficient measures that may be eligible
for funding are listed as follows along with their estimated measure life where applicable:
Major Measures:
Ceiling insulation up to R-48 for ceilings with less than R-30 in place. R-
30 or better attics will not be further insulated.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
BlahHIA.,
C. No. 28
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.4
Canceling Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - Continued
Energy Conservation Measures: (Continued)
Floor insulation over unheated spaced up to R-30.
Wall insulation up to R-26 for walls with no insulation installed (financing will not
be available for the installation ofurea-fonnaldehyde wall insulation).
Class 40 replacement windows.
Nothing shall preclude the Company from providing a reimbursement for the
installation of a greater R value on insulation for the above items that are detennined to be
cost effective (Savings to Investment Ratio is 1.0 or greater) through the audit process.
Supplemental Measures - Electric Heating System Required:
Attic ventilation, excluding power ventilators, when installed with ceiling
insulation (required if needed at the time ceiling insulation is installed). Whole
house mechanical ventilation and spot ventilation for kitchen and baths at time
ceiling insulation is installed.
Ground cover and water pipe wrap when installed with floor insulation; other vapor
barrier materials as required when installed with floor or ceiling insulation.
Forced air electric space heating duct insulation and sealing in unheated spaces.
Weather stripping and/or caulking, including blower door assisted air sealing and
duct sealing.
Thennal doors.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulah
RIJUM
C. No. 28
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.
Canceling Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - (Continued)
Energy Conservation Measures: (Continued)
Supplemental Measures - Electric Heating System Required (Continued)
Timed thermostats on centrally controlled multi-room heating/cooling systems except when
used with heat pumps. Heat anticipating type thermostats for zonal electric resistance
heating systems.
Additional Measures - No Electric Heating System Requirement:
Pipe insulation, energy efficient showerheads and aerators where electric water heaters are
present.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs applicable in all homes - limit 8 Energy Star certified bulbs
per home placed in fixtures that are on 2 hours or more per day.
Existing Refrigerator models with annual usage listed in the Weatherization Assistance
Program Technical Assistance center database as 900 kWh or greater may be replaced with
an Energy Star model with estimated annual consumption of 500 kWh or less. Replaced
refrigerators must be removed and recycled in accordance with EP A guidelines.
Provisions of Service for Energy Conservation Service to Low Income Customers
An Energy Audit must be completed by the Agency prior to installation of the
Major Measures by the Agency.
Agency must qualify residential customers for assistance using the Federal Low
Income guidelines.
Installation shall meet Federal, State and local building codes.
Measures installed under this schedule shall not receive financial incentives from
other Company programs.
Agency shall inspect the installation to insure that the weatherization meets or
exceeds required specifications.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
BlahOIA.'
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 21.6
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - (Continued)
Provisions of Service for Energy Conservation Service to Low Income Customers
(Continued)
Company may audit Agency weatherization and financial records and inspect the
installations in dwellings of customers receiving weatherization under this program.
Company shall pay the Agency the amount established under the terms of their
contract when provisions of this schedule have been met.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this schedule is subject to the
Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission, including future applicable amendments and additional regulations prescribed by regulatory
authorities.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115
STATE OF IDAHO
Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Incentives
Optional for Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this Schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in Commercial Buildings and Industrial
Facilities through the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s General Service Schedules 6, 6A, 8, 9
, 17, 19, 23 , 23A, 24, 35 and 35A in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
This Schedule is applicable to new and existing Commercial Buildings and Industrial Facilities
dairy barns served under the Company s residential rate schedules and traffic signals.
DEFINITIONS:
Commercial Building: A structure that is served by Company and meets the
applicability requirements of this tariff at the time an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement/Application is executed or approved by the Company which does not
meet the definition of an Industrial Facility.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at
the real property, or is the electricity user at the real property.
Energy Efficiency Incentive: Payments of money made by Company to Owner
or Customer for installation of an Energy Efficiency Measure pursuant to an
executed Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement/Application: An agreement between
Owner or Customer and Company or a Company provided application submitted
by the Owner or Customer and approved by the Company providing for Companyto furnish Energy Efficiency Incentives with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this Tariff Schedule.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
ulah01."
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM): A permanently installed measure which
can improve the efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New Construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of energy efficiency
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficiency equipment
modification.
In the case of both new construction and retrofits, EEM Costs shall mean the
Owner or Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any discounts, rebates or
incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives from the Company, or other
consideration that reduces the final actual EEM Cost incurred by the Owner or
Customer) to purchase and install EEMs at the Owner s or Customer s facility. If
the owner or customer installs the EEM then the cost of installation shall be equal
to the Owner s or Customer s actual labor costs for such installation.
Energy Efficiency Project: One or more EEM(s) with similar one year payback
limitations (Page 3), covered by one Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved application.
Industrial Facility: Buildings and process equipment associated with
manufacturing.
Mixed Use: Buildings served by a residential rate schedule and a rate schedule
listed under Applicable shall be eligible for services under this schedule provided
the Energy Efficiency Project meets the definition of New Construction or where
the Company adjusts the baseline energy consumption and costs.
New construction: A newly constructed facility or newly constructed square
footage added to an existing facility.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO.tt5 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Owner: The person who has both legal and beneficial title to the real property,
and is the mortgager under a duly recorded mortgage of real property, the trustor
under a duly recorded deed of trust.
Retrofit: Changes, modifications or additions to systems or equipment in existing
facility square footage.
INCENTIVE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES: The Company will
provide Energy Efficiency Incentives per the Provisions of Service to participating Owners or
Customers who have installed EEMs listed in the tables in this schedule or are eligible for an
Energy Efficiency Incentive per the formula listed below.
Energy Efficiency Projects consisting of Retrofit lighting EEMs (listed & not listed) and
or Retrofit EEMs are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided the simple payback
(based on electricity cost savings) before incentives is one year or more. EEMs with simple
paybacks before incentives of less than one year are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives
provided the Energy Efficiency Project has a simple payback before incentives of one year or
more. Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be available to reduce the simple payback of an
Energy Efficiency Project below one year. If required, individual EEM Energy Efficiency
Incentives will be adjusted downward pro-rata so the Energy Efficiency Project has a simple
payback after incentives of one year or more. Retrofit motor and HV AC EEMs (listed & not
listed) are not subject to the payback limitations listed above.
EEMs not listed in the incentive tables may be eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives.
Electric savings resulting from lighting interaction with mechanical equipment will not
eligible for an Energy Efficiency Incentive. The Company will complete an analysis of the EEM
Cost and electric energy savings and determine at its sole option whether to offer an Energy
Efficiency Incentive and the Energy Efficiency Incentive amount. Energy Efficiency Incentives
for such EEMs will be the lesser of (a) the product of multiplYing the Company s estimate of
annual energy savings by $0.08/kWh; or (b) 35% of the EEM Cost as determined by the
Company.
Company may adjust baseline electric energy consumption and costs to reflect any of the
following: energy codes, standard practice, changes in capacity, changes in production or facility
use and equipment at the end of its useful life. Such adjustments may be made for lighting energy
efficiency measures installed in new construction projects where energy code does not apply.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
Blah
RIJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
INCENTIVE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES: (Continued)
For existing fixtures, the baseline for all fluorescent lighting Energy Efficiency Measures
not listed in incentive Table 1 shall be the lesser of existing equipment or the energy efficient
magnetic ballast and energy saving lamp combination as listed in the lighting table available on
the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company web site.
Except for motors and mechanical energy efficiency measures listed in Tables 2 and 3
Lighting Energy Efficiency Measures listed in Table 1 in New Construction projects and
incentives for EEMs not listed (p.3), EEM Energy Efficiency Incentives shall not exceed 50% of
the EEM Cost.
All EEM Costs are subject to Company review and approval prior to offering an Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approving Energy Efficiency Incentive Application. All final
EEM Costs are subject to Company review and approval prior to paYing an Energy Efficiency
Incentive per the terms of the Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
Company review and approval of EEM Costs may require additional documentation from the
Customer or Owner.
The Owner or Customer may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive from the
Company per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:(1) Company may elect to offer EEM incentives through different channels and at
different points in the sales process other than individual Energy Efficiency
Incentive Agreement(s) or Applications prior to EEM purchase. The differences
will depend on EEM or proj ect type and will be consistent for all EEMs or
projects of similar type. Incentive requirements by EEM or project type and other
terms and conditions will be available on the Idaho energy efficiency program
section of the Company s web site. Changes in incentive requirements and/or
terms and conditions may be changed by the Company with at least 60 days notice
on the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company s web site.
Customer/Owner has the option to receive a signed Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or request approval of an Application direct from the Company prior
to purchase of eligible EEMs.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
RIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)(2) Company will employ a variety of quality assurance techniques during the
delivery of the program. They will differ by EEM and may include pre and post
installation inspections, phone surveys, and confirmation of customer and
equipment eligibility.
Company may verify or evaluate the energy savings of installed EEMs. This
verification may include a telephone survey, site visit, review of plant operation
characteristics, and pre- and post-installation of monitoring equipment and as
necessary to quantify actual energy savings.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS Service under this Schedule will be in
accordance with the terms of the Electric Service Agreement between the Customer and the
Company. The Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the
Idaho Public Utility Commission, including future applicable amendments, will be considered as
forming a part of and incorporated in said Agreement.
(3)
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
H IJiM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Tijblel - 'LigbtingEn~rgyEffitieficYNfeasures
, "
Customer .
. ......., ..... .
~Iic~J1tive
" ,
Replijce .With
.., '"" ,, .. ,.,
Cate2orY
' ... ,. .,'" ,. ... "' ,,
Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade T12 lamp(s)magnetic - 1 or 2 T8lamps+1EB
Standard T8 Fixtures (Standard T8 ballast (MB)
lamps and electronic ballasts (EB)3 or 4 T12Iamp(s) + MB(s)4' - 3 or 4 T8lamps+1EB $10
with ballast factor (BF) ~0.88)3 or4 T121amps + MB(s)8' -3 or 4 T8 lamps + 1EB, see note 6 $10
8' -T12 HONHO lamps HONHO lamps +EB $15
MB(s)(maximum of 2 EB), see note 6
Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade to 4'4' - 1 or 2 T12Iamp(s) + MB or standard 4' - 1 or 2 Premium T8 lamp(s) + EB $10
Premium T8 Fixtures (Lamps with T8 lamp(s) + EB
initial lumens ~31 00 or wattage ~30 4' - 3 or 4 T12 lamps + MB or standard 4' - 3 or 4 Premium T8 lamps + EB $15W; electronic ballasts with BF ~0.T8 lamps + EB
8' - 1 or 2 T12 lamp(s) + energy efficient 4' - 2, 3 or 4 Premium T8 lamps + EB $20magnetic ballast (MB)
Fluorescent Delamping and Standard 2 T12lamps + 1 MB 4' - 1 Standard T8 lamp + 1EB $10
T8 Fixture Upgrade (Standard T8
lamps and electronic ballasts (EB)3 T12lamps + 2 MB 4' - 2 or 1 Standard T8lamp + 1EB $15
with BF ~0.88 - Fixture removal is 4' -4 T12 lamps + 2 MB 4' - 3 Standard T8 lamps + 1EB $15not eligible)4 T12lamps + 2 MB 4' - 2 or 1 Standard T8 lamp + 1EB $25
Fluorescent Delamping and Premium 2 T12lamps + 1 MB 4' - I-Premium T8lamp + 1EB $15T8 Fixture Upgrade (Lamps with
initial lumens ~31 00 or wattage ~30 3 T12lamps + 2 MB 4' - 2 or I-Premium T8lamp + 1EB $20
W; electronic ballasts with BF ~0.4 T12 lamps + 2 MB 4' - 3-Premium T8 lamps + 1EB $20Fixture removal is not eligible)
4 T12lamps + 2 MB 4' - 2 or I-Premium T8lamp + 1EB $30
Compact Fluorescent Lighting (CFL)Incandescent ~1 OW (nominal) CFL hardwire fixture $10
Incandescent 210W, ~ 20W (nominal) CFL hardwire fixture $15
Incandescent 220W (nominal) CFL hardwire fixture $20
Incandescent ~40W two-piece screw-in CFL
Incandescent Single-piece screw in CFL (all wattages)
T5 Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade 2250 W MH, MV or HPS 3 - T5HO lamps (nominal 4') + EB - High Bay $70
2400 W MH, MV, or HPS 4 or 6 - T5HO lamps (nominal 4') + EB High $75Bay
4' 1 , or 3 T12 lamps + magnetic , 2, or 3 - T5 lamps (nominal 4'
) &
1EB $20ballast(s)I(interior fixtures)
4' 4 T8 or T12lamps + magnetic 2 - T5 HO lamps (nominal 4') & 1 EB (interior
fixtures)$20
ballast(s)
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 , 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
ulahHI."
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
High Intensity Discharges
(HID) Upgrades
Based on lamp wattages
~40W and ::;120W incandescent or tungsten ~35W and ::;100W Ceramic Metal Halide
:::-1O0W and::; 250W MH, MV, or HPS; :::-125Wand::;175WPulseStartMH
c::::500W incandescent
:::-250W and::; 400W MH, MV, or HPS
:::-
400W MH, MV, or HPS
:::-1O00W MH, MV or HPS
:::-250W & c:::: 400 W MH, MV, orHPS
:::-400WMH, MV,orHPS
:::-1000 W MH, MV or HPS
Incandescent or fluorescent exit signs
~400W MH, MV or HPS
~750W MH, MV, or HPS
Exit Signs
Lighting Controls Wall switch or no control
Traffic light upgrades
No control
No control
No control
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
$25
$100~250W and ::;320W Ceramic Metal Halide
400 W Ceramic Metal Halide $120
$60
:::-175W and ::;320W Pulse Start MH $80
:::-320W and c::::400W Pulse Start MH $100
:::-400W and c::::750W Pulse Start Metal Halide $120
4' - 4 lamp High Bay T8 fixture $50
4' - 6 lamp High Bay T8 fixture $50
4' 8 lamp High Bay T8 fixture $100
Light Emitting Diode (LED) or Electro $15
luminescent (EL) Exit Si n - 1 or 2 faced
Wall or Ceiling Mounted Occupancy Sensor $30
(per sensor)
Integral occu ancy sensor
Photocell (per sensor)
Time clock (per control)
LED Green Ball
LED Yellow and Green Ball
LED Green Arrow (12" or 8"
LED Don t Walk
LED Walk
$25
$20
$20
$40
$80
$30
$50
$20
Notes for Table 1:
Incentives are capped at 50 percent of EEM Costs except for Lighting EEMs listed above installed in New Construction.
2' U-tube lamps may be substituted for 4' linear fluorescent lamps in the above table
For retrofits of existing equipment, lighting incentives will be paid on a one-for-one equipment replacement basis. If fixture counts
are changing, the project may be considered under the approach for measures not listed (see page 3).
The total connected interior lighting power for New Construction projects required to comply with the energy code must be 10
percent lower than the interior lighting power allowance calculated under the current version of the Idaho energy code. The date of
the building permit application shall establish the current version of the Code. For New Construction projects not required to
comply with the energy code, the total connected lighting power must be 10% lower than common practice as determined by the
Company.
Incentives for the following equipment types are not available for New Construction projects
Standard T8 fixtures
Fixture de-Iamping
* LED Exit signs
One or two piece screw-in CFL fixtures
Lighting controls required under the current version of the Idaho energy code. The date of the building permit application shall
establish the current version of the Code.
6 Eight-foot T8s, T8 HONHO and High Bay T-8 electronic ballasts are required to have a BF::;J.2 to be eligible for incentives.
Lighting equipment listed only in the "Replace" column of Table 1 is not eligible for incentives.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulahHI.II
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Table 2 - NEMA Premium Efficiency Motors
...........
1.5
100
125
150
200
85.
86.
86.
89.
89.
91.0
91.7
93.
93.
93.
94.
94.
94.
95.
95.
95.4
95.4
95.
95.
85.
86.
86.
89.
89.
91.7
91.7
92.4
93.
93.
93.
94.
94.
95.
95.4
95.4
95.4
95.
96.
......~e~~~.#i~j.... .
.............,
fJJ~.
.,
!ln~~i~1111.~,.
77.0 77.
84.0 84.
85.5 85.
85.5 86.
86.5 88.
88.5 89.
89.5 90.
90.91.091.0 91.091.7 91.791.7 91.792.4 92.4
93.0 93.
93.6 93.
93.6 93.
93.6 94.
94.1 95.
94.1 95.
95.95.4
Notes for Table 2:1) Motors larger than 200 horsepower are not a listed measure and may be eligible under the approach for measures not listed
(see page 3).2) The NEMA Premium efficiency ratings listed are nominal full-load efficiency ratings. Motors that meet or exceed these
efficiency requirements may qualify for an incentive.
'~;~
JUii~i~~~t~: ;:~iil~1$45 82.5 82.$45 86.5 87.$54 87.5 88.$54 88.5 89.$54 89.5 89.$81 90.91.0$90 91.7 91.0$104 91.7 91.7$113 92.4 91.7$117 93.0 93.$135 93.6 93.$162 94.1 94.$198 94.1 94.$234 94.5 94.$270 94.5 94.$360 95.0 95.$540 95.0 95.$630 95.4 95.$630 95.4 95.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulahOIA"
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Unitary Commercial
Air Conditioners
Air Cooled
(Cooling Mode)
-c:::65 000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package
2:65 000 Btu/hr and -c::: Split System and Single Package
135 000 Btulhr
~ 135,000 Btulhr and Split System and Single Package
-c::: 240 000 Btu/hr
2: 240 000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package
Unitary Commercial -c::: 135 000 Btulhr
Air Conditioners
Water and Evaporatively ~ 135 000 Btu/hr
Cooled
Split System and Single Package
Package Terminal Air :::; 8 000 Btulhr
Conditioners (PT AC)
(Heating & Cooling Mode)
Heat Pumps
Air Cooled
(Cooling Mode)
Heat Pumps
Air Cooled
(Heating Mode)
Single Package
)0 8 000 and -c::: 10 500 Single Package
Btulhr
2: 10 500 and ::; 13 500 Single Package
Btulhr
)0 13 500 Btulhr Single Package
-c::: 65 000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package
~ 65 000 Btu/hr and -c::: Split System and Single Package
135 000 Btulhr
~ 135 000 Btu/hr and Split System and Single Package
-c::: 240 000 Btulhr
2: 240 000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package
-c::: 65 000 Btulhr Split System
Single Package
~ 65 000 Btu/hr and -c::: 47OF. db /43OF. wb Outdoor Air
135 000 Btu/hr 17OF. db /15OF. wb Outdoor Air
~ 135 000 Btu/hr 47OF. db /43OF. wb Outdoor Air
17OF. db /15OF. wb Outdoor Air
85OF. Entering waterHeat Pumps, Water Source -c::: 135 000 Btulhr
(Cooling Mode)
Heat Pumps, Water Source -c::: 135 000 Btulhr
(Heating Mode)
700F. Entering water
Continued)
15.0 SEER
12.5 EER
11.0 EER
11.4 IPL V
10.8 EER
11.2 IPL V
10.0 EER
10.4 IPLV
14.0 EER
14.0 EER
11.8 EER
3.3 COP Heatin
11.4 EER
2 COP Heatin
10.7 EER
1 COP Heatin
10.0 EER
0 COP Heating
13.0 SEER
11.0 EER
11.4 IPL V
10.8 EER
11.2 IPL V
10.0 EER
10.4 IPL V
0 HSPF
7.5 HSPF
3.4 COP
2.4 COP
3 COP
2 COP
14.0 EER
6 COP
210/240
340/360
,.. ..,...."
~'sjjQmer
Ip~~i1iY~~$/tgQ:~ '
$50
$50
$50
$50
210/240 $50
340/360 $50
$50
$50
$50
310/380
$50
210/240 $50
$50
340/360
340/360
340/360
320
320
$50
$50
See note 3 below
See note 3 below
See note 3 below
See note 3 below
See note 3 below
See note 3 below
$50
See note 3 below
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
ulah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Programmable Thermostats
Industry Standard Rating $0.02/ISR CFM
(ISR) CFM
Programmable thennostat for air EnergyStarCID labeled $50/thermostatconditioner unit
Optimizer programmable EnergyStar~
thermostat for heat pumps or all . t
electric
labeled $70/thermostat
Variable frequency drives
(VFD)
HV AC fans and urn s
Beverage or refrigerated
display machine occupancy
sensor
:::; 100 hp HV AC fans or
pumps
HV AC fans and pumps See notes 4 and 5 below $80/hp
Beverage vending or
refrigerated display machine
occu anc sensor
$75/sensor
Notes for Table 3:l) For retrofits of existing equipment, incentives are for one-for-one same size equipment replacements. Exception: PT ACs
can replace electric resistive heating, which must be removed.2) Equipment that meets or exceeds all efficiency requirements listed for the size category in the above table may qualify for an
incentive.3) Incentives for heat pumps are $50 per ton of cooling capacity ONLY. No incentives are paid per ton of heating capacity.
Heat Pumps must meet both the cooling mode and heating mode efficiency requirements to qualify for per ton coolingefficiency incentives. 4) Throttling or bypass devices, such as inlet vanes, bypass dampers, three-way valves, or throttling valves must be removed or
permanently disabled to qualify for HV AC fan and pump VFD incentives.5) For New Construction, incentives are not available for HV AC fan and pump VFDs required by current version of the Idaho
energy code
6) SEER = Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio EER = Energy Efficiency Ratio COP = Coefficient of Performance
HSPF = Heating Seasonal Performance Factor IPL V = Integrated Part Load Value
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 117.
UT AH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 117
STATE OF IDAHO
Residential Refrigerator Recycling Program
PURPOSE: Service under this tariff is intended to decrease residential refrigeration loads
through the removal and recycling of inefficient models.
APPLICABLE: To existing residential customers in all territory served by the Company in
the State of Idaho billed on Schedule 1. Landlords who own appliances in rental properties served
by the company in the State of Idaho where the tenant is billed under Schedule 1 also qualify for
this program. This tariff will expire August 1 2007.
CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION: Customer participation is voluntary and is initiated by
contacting a specified toll-free telephone number or website.
DESCRIPTION: Customers receive a $40 incentive to discontinue use of their working
second refrigerators and/or freezers or to replace their working primary refrigerators and freezers
with new more energy efficient models. To qualify for the incentive customers must give up their
appliances for recycling. Appliances will be collected and recycled to ensure they are not resold on
the secondary market. Company will offer a packet with written energy efficiency information and
instant savings measures.
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT: Working refrigerators and freezers that are a minimum of
10 cubic feet in size, utilizing inside measurements.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: Incentives will be available on a maximum of two
appliances per qualifYing household. Incentive checks will be mailed within 30 days of the
appliance collection date.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulah
Alrllll
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 117.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 117 - (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
Incentives are also available to landlords that own the appliances used in rental properties in
Utah Power s Idaho service territory where their tenant is billed on a residential schedule.
Landlords may receive incentives on a maximum of two appliances per unit.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this schedule will be
accordance with the terms of the Electric Service Agreement between the Customer and the
Company. The Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the
Idaho Public Utilities Commission, including future applicable amendments, will be considered as
forming a part of and incorporated in said Agreement.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
ulah
RIJlM
C. No. 28
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling Third Revised Sheet No. 120.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 120
STATE OF IDAHO
NO NEW SERVICE
Commercial Energy Services
Optional to Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to reduce the energy requirements of new
Commercial Buildings and existing Commercial Buildings undergoing Major Renovation by promoting the
installation of Energy Conservation Measures.
APPLICABLE: Conservation Payments are not available to Owners after November 15 , 2005.
The restriction on new service does not affect payment of Energy Service Charges currently required and
obligations pursuant to an executed Energy Services Contract remain in effect until the Conservation
Payment with interest is re-paid in full.
This program is applicable to service to new Commercial Buildings larger than 12 000 square feet
and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation under General Service Electric Service
Schedules in the State of Idaho. Warehouses and other New Commercial Buildings and existing
commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be suitable for a
prescriptive approach are excluded from this program and are included under Schedule 122.
Charges under this schedule will be in addition to the electric service charge under the Customer
applicable electric service schedule. THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER TillS SCHEDULE WILL APPLY
TO ALL CUSTOMERS USING ELECTRICITY AT THE REAL PROPERTY SPECIFIED BY AN
ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT.
DESCRIPTION: Service under this program is available to improve the energy efficiency of New
Commercial Buildings larger than 12 000 square feet and existing Commercial Buildings undergoing Major
Renovation to be connected to Company s system on or after the effective date of this schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
RIJlM
C. No. 28
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling Third Revised Sheet No. 120.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 120 - Continued
DESCRIPTION: (Continued)
The Company will provide the Conservation Payments for incremental construction which result in the
installation of Energy Conservation Measures. Upon connection of electric service to commercial buildings
having such measures installed under this program, Company will bill the Customer an Energy Service
Charge as specified by this Schedule
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kWh savings resulting from installation of the Energy
Conservation Measures, as estimated by Company using engineering analysis.
Baseline Level: Electric energy use estimated to occur from compliance with current commercial
building code requirements for New Commercial Buildings or from implementation of the Owner s building
plans initially presented to Company, whichever is less.
Conservation Payments: Any payments of money made by Company to Owner for installation of
Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to an Energy Services Contract. If the Company has assisted in
implementing the Energy Conservation Measures, Conservation Payments also shall include Company
direct costs of such implementation, including the cost of materials, installation, and ongoing support as
specified in the Energy Services Contract. Conservation Payments shall be either:
( a) Level l Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which do not exceed the
Measure Funding Limit.
Level 2 Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which exceed the Measure
Funding Limit. The Level 2 Conservation Payments may not exceed, for any Energy
Services Contract, the amount of the Level l Conservation Payments nor shall the
maximum Level 2 Conservation Payments for any individual Conservation Measure be
more than three times the applicable Measure Funding Limit.
(b)
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at the real property
identified in the Energy Services Contract.
Energy Conservation Measures: Permanently installed measures specified in an Energy Services
Contract, which can reduce the Customer s electric energy use.
Energy Services Contract: A contract between Owner and Company providing for Company to
furnish or provide Conservation Payments with respect to Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to this
tariff Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
HI.IN
C. No. 28
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling Third Revised Sheet No. 122.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 122
ST ATE OF IDAHO
NO NEW SERVICE
Commercial Energy Services
Optional to Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to reduce the energy requirements of certain
commercial buildings by promoting the installation of Energy Conservation Measures through a prescriptive
approach.
APPLICABLE: Conservation Payments are not available to Owners after November 15, 2005.
The restriction on new service does not affect payment of Energy Service Charges currently required and
obligations pursuant to an executed Energy Services Contract remain in effect until the Conservation
Payment with interest is re-paid in full.
This program is applicable to service under the General Service Electric Service Schedules in the
State of Idaho to New Commercial Buildings and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major
Renovation with 12 000 square feet or less, new warehouses, and other New Commercial Buildings and
existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be suitable for
prescriptive approach.
Charges under this schedule will be in addition to the electric service charge under the Customer
applicable electric service schedule. THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER TillS SCHEDULE WILL APPLY
TO ALL CUSTOMERS USING ELECTRICITY AT THE REAL PROPERTY SPECIFIED BY
ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT.
DESCRIPTION: Service under this program is available to improve the energy efficiency of New
Commercial Buildings with 12 000 square feet or less, new warehouses, and other New Commercial
Buildings and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be
suitable for a prescriptive approach. This program will utilize a prescriptive approach. Company will
provide to Owner a menu of recommended Energy Conservation Measures. From this menu, Owner will
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
BlahHIA.,
C. No. 28
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling Third Revised Sheet No. 122.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 122 - (Continued)
DESCRIPTION: (Continued)
select the specific Energy Conservation Measures which are to be installed in Owner s Commercial Building
and for which the Company will provide Conservation Payments. Upon connection of electric service to
commercial buildings having such measures installed under this program, Company will bill the Customer
an Energy Service Charge as specified by this Schedule.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kWh savings resulting from installation of the Energy
Conservation Measures, as estimated by Company using engineering analysis.
Conservation Payments: Any payments of money made by Company to Owner for installation of
Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to an Energy Services Contract. Conservation Payments shall be
either:
(a)Level 1 Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which do not exceed the Measure
Funding Limit.
(b)Level 2 Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which exceed the Measure
Funding Limit. The Level 2 Conservation Payments may not exceed, for any Energy
Services Contract, the amount of the Level 1 Conservation Payments nor shall the
maximum Level 2 Conservation Payments for any individual Conservation Measure be
more than three times the applicable Measure Funding Limit.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at the real property
identified in the Energy Services Contract.
Energy Conservation Measures: Permanently installed measures specified in an Energy Services
Contract, which can reduce the Customer s electric energy use.
Energy Services Contract: A contract between Owner and Company providing for Company to
furnish or provide Conservation Payments with respect to Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to this
tariff Schedule.
Major Renovation: Replacement of the major components of the building s envelope which must
include replacement measures for over 50 percent of all external window or uninsulatable wall area.
Melded Interest Rate: An interest rate which is the sum of the interest rates specified in (a) and
(b) below-
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 , 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulah
R lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125
STATE OF IDAHO
Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Incentives
Optional for Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in Commercial and Industrial Facilities
by promoting the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s General Service Schedules 6, 6A, 8
, 17, 19, 23, 23A, 24, 35, and 35A. in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
This Schedule is not applicable to existing Commercial Buildings under 20 000 square feet.
Square footage is the total Building or Facility area served by the Company s meter(s). This
schedule is applicable to dairy barns served on the Company s residential rate schedules.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kilowatt-hour (kWh) savings resulting from
installation of the Energy Efficiency Measures, as estimated by Company using
engineering analysis.
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings: The Average Monthly On Peak
kilowatt (kW) savings resulting from the installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures as estimated by Company using engineering analysis as described
below:
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings = (baseline average monthly On Peak kW
- proposed average monthly On Peak kW), where;
Average monthly On Peak k W = sum of the 12 Monthly Maximum On Peak
kW/12, where;
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
Blah
RIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
:::::-
Monthly Maximum On Peak kW = highest of all 15 minute average kW (as
determined below) for On Peak hours. On Peak hours are those hours
specified in the electric service schedule under which the customer receives
electric service.
:::::- 15 minute average kW = sum of kWh used over 0.25 hrs/0.25 hrs
Baseline Level:
Baseline Adjustments: Company may adjust baseline electric energy
consumption and costs during engineering analysis to reflect any of the
following: energy codes, standard practice, changes in capacity, changes in
production or facility use and equipment at the end of its useful life. For
existing fixtures, baseline wattages for all fluorescent lighting Energy
Efficiency Measures in all facilities shall be the lesser of existing
equipment or the energy efficient magnetic ballast and energy savings
lamp combination listed in the lighting table available on the Idaho energy
efficiency program section of the Company web site.
Commercial Building: A structure that is served by Company and meets the
applicability requirements of this tariff at the time an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement is executed or Application is approved which does not meet the
definition of an Industrial Facility.
Commissioning: The process of verifying and documenting that the performance
of electric energy using systems meets the design intent and Owner s operational
requirement.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at
the real property, or is the electricity user at the real property.
Energy Efficiency Incentive: Payment of money made by Company to Owner or
Customer for installation of Energy Efficiency Measures pursuant to an executed
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
utah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement/Application: An agreement between
Owner or Customer and Company or a Company provided application submitted
by the Owner or Customer and approved by the Company providing for Company
to furnish Energy Efficiency Incentive with respect to Energy Efficiency Measures
pursuant to this tariff Schedule.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM): Permanently installed measure specified in
an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application which can
improve the efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use. EEMs designed to
primarily reduce Average Monthly On Peak kW must also reduce electric energy
use to be eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Major renovation: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficiency equipment or
modification.
In the case of New Construction, Major Renovation and Retrofits, EEM Costs
shall mean the Owner or Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any
discounts, rebates or incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives from the
Company, or other consideration that reduces the final actual EEM Cost incurred
by the Owner or Customer) to purchase and install EEMs at the Owner or
Customer s facility. If the Owner or Customer installs the EEM then the cost of
installation shall be equal to the Owner s or Customer s actual labor costs for such
installation.
Energy Efficiency Project:
One or more EEM( s) covered by one Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 , 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
HIJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Industrial Facility: Buildings and process equipment associated with
manufacturing.
Mixed Use: Buildings served by a residential rate schedule and a rate schedule
listed under Applicable shall be eligible for services under this schedule provided
the Energy Efficiency Project meets the definition of New Construction or Major
Renovation.
New Construction: A newly constructed facility or newly constructed square
footage added to an existing facility.
Major Renovation: Changes, modifications or additions to existing facility
systems or equipment that involve substantial removal and replacement with new
systems or equipment where such changes, modifications or additions are required
to comply with energy code, replace equipment at the end of its useful life, add
capacity or change the use of the facility.
Owner: The person who has both legal and beneficial title to the real property
specified in an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application
who is the mortgagor under a duly recorded mortgage or the grantor under a duly
recorded deed of trust or a purchaser under a duly recorded agreement with
respect to such real property.
Retrofit: Changes, modifications or additions to systems or equipment in
existing facility square footage.
Supplemental Services Agreement: An agreement between Owner or Customer
and Company providing for Company to furnish Supplemental Services with
respect to Supplemental Services section of this Tariff Schedule.
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS:
. -
Energy Efficiency Incentives: Energy Efficiency Incentives made by the
Company for installation of EEMs pursuant to an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application shall be the lesser of the sum of (a) and (b)
OR (c):
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued)
(a)$0 .12/k Wh for the Annual kWh savings as determined using Company
provided or approved engineering analysis;
$50/kW for Average Monthly On Peak kW savings determined using
Company provided or approved engineering analysis.
50% of the EEM Cost as determined by the Company.
(b)
(c)
Energy Efficiency Proj ects are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided
the simple payback (based on electricity cost savings) before incentives is one
year or more. EEMs with simple paybacks before incentives of less than one year
are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided the Energy Efficiency
Project has a simple payback before incentives of one year or more.
Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be available to reduce the simple payback of
an Energy Efficiency Project below one year. If required, individual EEM Energy
Efficiency Incentives will be adjusted downward pro-rata so the Energy Efficiency
Project has a simple payback after incentives of one year or more.
All proposed Energy Efficiency Measure costs are subject to Company review and
approval prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approving
an Application. All final Energy Efficiency Measure costs are subject to Company
review and approval prior to paYing an Energy Efficiency Incentive per the terms
of an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application. Company
review and approval of Energy Efficiency Measure costs may require additional
documentation from the Customer or Owner.
To qualify for Energy Efficiency Incentives, a maximum of 50% of the annual
kWh savings resulting from installation of EEMs specified in an Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application can result from lighting.
For the purposes of calculating maximum annual electric savings resulting from
lighting, electric savings resulting from lighting interaction with mechanical
equipment and from lighting controls will be considered to be lighting savings.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
HIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued)
To qualify for Energy Efficiency Incentives new Commercial Buildings and
Major Renovation projects required to comply with current Idaho energy codes
must reduce the proposed electric energy consumption by at least 10% when
compared to the baseline level of whole building electric energy consumption that
would have resulted under the current Idaho energy code.
The baseline and proposed building design shall be modeled using the
methodology defined in Addendum e (Informative Appendix G) to ASHRAE 90.
2001 (or successor versions) using values from the current Idaho energy codes.
Company shall maintain guidelines on the application of this methodology. The
date of the building permit application shall establish the current version of the
code.
The Customer or Owner may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive from
the Company per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:
(1)
(2)
Energy Analysis
Company shall meet with Customer or Owner and any design team and
may perform an initial site visit/plans review to determine what EEMs
may be appropriate for an energy analysis.
Supplemental Services
Company may offer Supplemental Services beyond those described
elsewhere in this Tariff Schedule through a Supplemental Services
Agreement. Supplemental services shall include, but are not limited to:
detailed design, life cycle costs calculations or compliance documentation
for green or high performance building standards. Company will negotiate
the amount and terms of the supplemental services on a project specific
basis and may require any or all of the following: installation of EEMs
delivering a certain amount of annual kWh savings, offset of a portion of
the available incentive or direct reimbursement of a portion (up to 100%)
of the direct Company costs for the service provided.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulah
RIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
(3)
(4)
(4a)
(5)
EEM Inspection
Company will inspect any EEMs which are funded by or installed under
this program. Satisfactory inspection by Company will be required prior
to receiving Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
EEM Commissioning
Company will require that EEMs as specified in the Energy Efficiency
Incentive Agreement or approved Application be commissioned prior to
receiving Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy Efficiency
Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
Commissioning Opt-Out: Required EEM Commissioning may be
omitted with the following adjustments. Annual kWh savings, Average
Monthly On Peak kW savings and eligible EEM Costs will all be reduced
by 20% and an Energy Efficiency Incentive calculated using the provisions
specified under Incentives for EEMs. EEMs where the Owner or
Customer has "opted-out" of EEM Commissioning and are later
commissioned are not eligible for an additional Energy Efficiency
Incentive after the Energy Efficiency Incentive is paid.
Measure Performance Verification/Evaluation
Company may verify or evaluate the energy savings of installed Energy
Efficiency Measures specified in the Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application. This verification may include a
telephone survey, site visit, review of plant operation characteristics, and
pre- and post-installation of monitoring equipment as necessary to quantify
actual energy savings.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Minimum Equipment Efficiency
For Retrofit Energy Efficiency Projects EEMs must meet mInImum
equipment efficiency levels and equipment eligibility requirements in
Schedule 115 to be eligible for incentives available under this Schedule.
For lighting, see Table 1 and notes 2, 6 and 7. For motors, see Table 2 and
note 2. For Mechanical EEMs, see Table 3 and notes 1-4 and 6.
Heat Pump Systems
Company will provide Energy Efficiency Incentives for energy efficiency
improvements to heat pump space heating systems only for Energy
Efficiency Proj ects whose base case plans call for heat pump space heating
systems.
Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be made available to induce fuel
switching by Owner or Customer.
Design team honorarium: Company may offer an honorarium as described
on the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company web site
to a design team member with current professional certification including
architects and engineers to encourage early initial Company consultation
on Owner/Customer s design and plans. Honorariums will be equally
available to all professionally certified architects and engineers for Idaho
projects within Company s territory and will be limited to one honorarium
per project. Additional conditions for the honorarium will be available on
the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company s web site
and may be changed with 60 days notice posted on the web site.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this Schedule is
subject to the General Rules and Regulations contained in the tariff of which this
Schedule is a part, and to those prescribed by regulatory authorities.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulah
R lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
AGRICUL TURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155
STATE OF IDAHO
Optional for Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this Schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in agricultural irrigation systems and
irrigation district pumping systems by promoting electric energy-efficient irrigation practices and
the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s Irrigation and Soil Drainage Pumping
Power Service Schedule 10, and to any customer who qualifies as a "Farm Load" under the
Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, P.L. 96-501 and receives
electric service on a retail schedule in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kilowatt-hour (kWh) savings resulting from
installation of the Energy Efficiency Measures or improved equipment operation
as estimated by the Program Administrator or Company.
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings: The Average Monthly On Peak
kilowatt (kW) savings resulting from the installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures or improved equipment operation as estimated by Program
Administrator or Company using engineering analysis as described below:
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings = (baseline average monthly On Peak kW
- proposed average monthly On Peak kW), where;
Average Monthly On Peak kW = sum of the 12 Monthly Maximum On Peak
kW/12, where;
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
RIJIM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Monthly Maximum On Peak kW = highest of all 15 minute average kW (as
determined below) for On Peak hours. On Peak hours are those hours
specified in the electric service schedule under which the customer receives
electric service.
15 minute average kW = sum of kWh used over 0.25 hrs/0.25 hrs
Baseline Adjustments: Program Administrator or Company may adjust baseline
electric energy consumption and costs during engineering analysis to reflect any of
the following: standard practice, changes in capacity, changes in production or
system use and equipment at the end of its useful life.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at
the real property, is the owner of the real property, or is the electricity user at the
real property.
Energy Efficiency Incentive: Payment of money made by Program
Administrator or Company to Customer for installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to an executed Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application.
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement: An agreement between Customer and
Program Administrator or Company providing for Program Administrator or
Company to furnish Energy Efficiency Incentive with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this tariff Schedule.
Energy Efficiency Incentive Application: An application provided by the
Program Administrator or Company, completed by the Customer and approved by
the Program Administrator or Company requesting the Program Administrator or
Company furnish Energy Efficiency Incentives with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this Schedule.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM): Permanently installed measure specified in
an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application which can improve the
efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
ulah
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Energy Efficiency Project: One or more EEM(s) covered by one Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New Construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the required/common practice equipment
or system.
Major System Upgrades: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy
efficient equipment or system minus the cost of the required/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient equipment or
modification.
In the case of New Construction, Major System Upgrades and Retrofits, EEM
Costs shall mean the Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any discounts
rebates or incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives available under this
Schedule or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Environmental
Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) incentives, or other consideration that reduces
the final actual EEM Cost incurred by the Customer) to purchase and install
EEMs at the Customer s facility. If the Customer installs the EEM, then the cost
of installation shall be equal to the Customer s reasonable and realistic actual
labor costs for such installation.
New Construction: New irrigation pIpIng, pumping, or system to provide
irrigation for existing irrigated acreage or loads.
Major System Upgrades: Changes, modifications or additions to existing
irrigation systems or equipment that involve substantial removal and replacement
with new systems or equipment where such changes, modifications or additions
are required to replace equipment at the end of its useful life, add capacity or
change the utilization of the acreage or loads.
Program Administrator: Qualified person or entity hired by the Company to
administer this Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
ulilh
H lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Retrofit: Changes, modifications or additions to systems or equipment serving
existing acreage or loads.
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS:
Nozzle exchange: Program Administrator or Company shall establish procedures
and requirements for a nozzle exchange program allowing Customer to
exchange existing nozzles, gasket and drains for appropriately sized new and like
equipment. Nozzle exchange procedures, and requirements will be posted on the
Company web site. Equipment installed on pivot systems will not be eligible for
Energy Efficiency Incentives under the Nozzle exchange portion of this Schedule
but will be eligible for amounts listed in Table l , if not listed, based on the
Energy Efficiency Incentives energy, demand and cost formula below.
Energy Efficiency Incentives: Program Administrator or Company shall
establish procedures and requirements for providing Energy Efficiency Incentives
to Customers which shall be posted on the Company web site. Energy Efficiency
Incentives include amounts listed in Table 1 and amounts available according to
the energy, demand and cost formula listed below. All proposed Energy
Efficiency Projects are subject to Program Administrator or Company approval
prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application.
Program Administrator or Company will establish Energy Efficiency Project
approval criteria and post the criteria on the Company web site.
For all EEMs not eligible under the Nozzle exchange or listed in Table 1 , Energy
Efficiency Incentives made available for installation of EEMs pursuant to an
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application shall be shall be the lesser
of the sum of (a) and (b) OR (c):
(a) $0.12 /kWh for the Annual kWh savings as determined using Program
Administrator or Company provided or approved engineering analysis;
$50/kW for Average Monthly On Peak kW savings determined using
Program Administrator or Company provided or approved engineering
analysis.
50% of the EEM Cost as determined by the Program Administrator or
Company.
(b)
(c)
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 2005
Blah
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
IN CENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued)
Energy Efficiency Incentives may be adjusted such that Customer does not receive
more than 100% of EEM Costs in total incentives including incentives available
under this Schedule and EQIP incentives.
All proposed EEM Costs are subject to Program Administrator or Company
review and approval prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement
or approving an Application. All final EEM Costs are subject to Program
Administrator or Company review and approval prior to paYing an Energy
Efficiency Incentive per the terms of an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application. Program Administrator or Company review and approval
of EEM Costs may require additional documentation from the Customer.
The Customer may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive under this
Schedule per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:
(1)Energy Analysis
Program Administrator or Company shall meet with Customer and any
design team and may perform an initial site visit/plans review to determine
what EEMs may be appropriate for an energy analysis. The energy
analysis may include a visual pump check, water management
consultation, pump testing, and/or irrigation/pump system analysis.
At the conclusion of the visual pump check and water management
consultation, the Customer may be asked to sign an approval to proceed to
the next step in the program and to commit to implement operational
improvements identified in the water management consultation. If
Customer signs the approval Customer will receive an irrigation/pump
system analysis, an incentive offer if potential upgrades are identified, and
post-installation testing of installed system.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
RIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
(2)
(3)
(4)
EEM Inspection
Program Administrator or Company may inspect any EEMs which are
funded by or installed under this program. Satisfactory inspection by
Program Administrator or Company will be required prior to receiving
Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application.
Measure Performance Verification/Evaluation
Program Administrator and/or Company may verify or evaluate the energy
savings of installed Energy Efficiency Measures specified in the Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application, nozzles or
equipment received as part of the Nozzle Exchange, and/or improved
equipment operation. This verification may include a telephone survey,
site visit, review of system operating characteristics, and pre- and post-
installation of monitoring equipment as necessary to quantify actual energy
savIngs.
Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be made available to induce fuel
switching by Customer.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this Schedule is subject to
the General Rules and Regulations contained in the tariff of which this Schedule is a part, and to
those prescribed by regulatory authorities.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15, 2005
ulah
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
Category
Pivot Span Low
Pressure Drains
Sprinkler PressureRe lators
Sprinkler Package
Dual Sprinkler
Packages
Table 1. Pivot E ui ment EnerReplace With
Existing pivot low pressure
drains
Existing sprinkler pressurere lators
Existing sprinkler package
with design flow
::;:..
m/acre
Existing sprinkler package
with a design flow
::;:..
m/acre.
Efficienc Measures
New low pressure drain replacement parts or
entire drain assemblies
New sprinkler pressure regulators with the
same or lower outlet desi ressure
New sprinkler package with a design flow c::::
5 gpm/acre
Customer
incentive
$4/each
$6/each
$900 per
center pivot
Dual sprinkler head assemblies and a second $500 per
sprinkler package with a design flow C::::center pivot
m/acre
Notes for Table 1:
1). All sprinklers on a center pivot must be replaced to qualify for incentives. 2). Minimum 80 heads
maximum 170 heads per center pivot. 3). Drop tubes and new pressure regulators are considered part of the
new sprinkler package and are not eligible for individual incentives.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15 , 2005
Blah
R lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 191
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 191
STATE OF IDAHO
CUSTOMER EFFICIENCY SERVICES ADJUSTMENT
PURPOSE: The Customer Efficiency Services Adjustment is designed to recover the costs
incurred by the Company associated with Commission-approved demand-side management expenditures.
APPLICATION: This Schedule shall be applicable to all retail tariff Customers taking service
under the Company s electric service schedules.
MONTHLY BILL: In addition to the Monthly Charges contained in the Customer s applicable
schedule, all monthly bills shall have the following percentage increases applied prior to the application of
electric service Schedule 34.
Schedule
Schedule 6
Schedule 6A
Schedule 7
Schedule 7 A
Schedule 8
Schedule 9
Schedule 10
Schedule 11
Schedule 12 - Street Lighting
Schedule 12 - Traffic Signal
Schedule 19
Schedule 23
Schedule 23A
Schedule 35
Schedule 35A
Schedule 36
50 %
50 %
1.50 %
50 %
50 %
1.50 %
50 %
50%
50 %
1.50 %
50%
1.50 %
1.50 %
50 %
1.50 %
1.50 %
50 %
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2, 2005 EFFECTIVE: January 1 2006
ulah
HI.IN
C. No. 28
SeyeBthEi$?:hth Revised Sheet No. 21.1
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.1
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO.
STATE OF IDAHO
ResideBtialEBerg~7 EfficieBcy RiderLow Income Weatherization Services
Optional For Income Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization of the
electricity requirements of 10\'/ incomeexisting residential dwellings inhabited by customers that meet
income guidelines through the installation of permanent energy sa~(ing efficient materials
.:.
, and energy
efficient electro technologies.The decision to extend service under this schedule shall be based upon the
eligibility requirements contained herein.
AVAILABILITY: This tariff is applicable to residential custOlners iln all territory served by the
Company in the state of Idaho. Service under this tariff ,-..rill be limited to dv/ellings having pelmanently
installed electric heat.
ENERGY CONSERVATION SERVICE TO LOW INCOME CUSTOMERS:
This program is available to existing single family and multi-family residential units. It is
intended to reduce the electricity requirements and increase the penetration of weatherization and
efficiency measures in low incOlne residential dwellings inhabited by low income households
through the installation of permanent '.yeathelization energy efficiency materials. The decision
extend service under this schedule shall be based on eligibility requirements contained herein.
Definitions:
Dwelling as described in Energy Conservation Service to Existing Residential
Buildings.is real or personal property within the state inhabited as the principal
residence of a dwelling owner or a tenant. "Dwelling" includes a manufactured
home. a single-family home. duplex or multi-unit residential housing. "Dwelling:
does not include a recreational vehicle.
's,1!t2JJJirlG \:1 IJ n~IGL~.)I~l ~T -
ISSUED:. Se tember 2+.2005
M-V:tBet:A'3-1 t Bf'-,N,1';- ~)-f)f-)
EF,FEC'I'lVE:November 15, 2005&Hl3fHtB:ed----tJneB-r
~~D: July 14 --2:f+
Blah
R IJiM
C. No. 28
Seventh Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.2
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
Duplexes and fourplexes are eligible if at least one half of the dwelling is
occupied by low income tenants.
(Continued)
Snl!n1itt
~~
~L LID ~t~ rJ2r:d~r,ti,
lSSlJKn: September 2+, 2005
Ad-V'i€t~--l::A3-H:e'F N nA)O"(J6
srEn J 1 )001;)
'~,,.;
lfi'I!?: I:;'.
$:,
$11.'-..,1, ,If"November 2005&lliffiT~tre'f1-Unde
Ii'FFIi' (I=IVE A I ~ 200QL1.UgU~;t
ulahOIA.'
C. No. 28
Seventh Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21.
Canceling Sh::tk Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 -= (Continued)
Definitions (eot:ltinHt.,~lContinuedb. Triplexes and multi-family dwellings are eligible if at least 66% of the units
are occupied by low income tenants.
2~.
34.
4~.
Permanently installed mobile or floating home as described in Energy
Conservation Service to Existing Residential Buildings.
Agency" means a non-profit group, Municipality or County authorized to receive
funds for installation of energy efficiency materials in low income properties.
Low Income" means households qualifying under the federal low Income
guidelines and certified for eligibility according to agency procedure. Income
eligibility is based on 150% of federal poverty guidelines.
Major Measure" means ceiling insulation, wall insulation, floor insulation ef
stom1and window replacements applicable in dwellings with permanently installed
electric space heating systemss. When cost-effective (Savings to Investment Ratio
of 1.0 or greaterl, all major measures must be installed or in place or financial
assistance under this schedule will not be offered. If physical barriers exist that
prohibit the installation of a measure, then the measure is not required as a
condition for financial assistance under this schedule.
56.Optional Supplemental Measures and Additional Measures" are not required
measures under this schedule
-,-
unless the measure is recommended as part of a
requiredmeasure.butmay qualify for a Company reimbursement.
Recommended Measures" are not required measures under this schedule, nor are
they deemed to be ah...."ays cost effecti'le. They are recommended to achieve
maximum energy efficiency.
Financial Assistance:
1. The Company will reimburse tfle--!.!.Agency.!.!. up to an average of $1 4(:)Q-500 per home
annually (April 1 through March 31)on weatherized dwellings where at least one Major
Measure is installed. Reimbursements on weatherized homes will be provided one time
s.lib,nJLt~~~~LJJn~t G I. ~l rQ~rJ,,!g
ISSUED: ...-:';ept emher +2. 2005
A ...1: ~o~;":' I
,;,
~1'~J'e,...1\.ILL,. ', A f!.(';'1'Ttlv l'-',.4:,..;,-,'tt"", . ,,-,.
, '
l:.1-j'("y
lSSlr T. I 14 ?mW
,..
,-, ,i;
: ..~"..;
JC~ !"LYfIj,rl'm:jN1 ,I:' ,1(,
.. "
N, ,N,
~,
No \'(,11111(' r 15 , 2005 S uhIni4-,k,~1--tJ-r-1Je-t~
FFIT(TPlE A o 000;J"
,,,
;J,
-'. "
llbUSt .
.(...,
ulahRI."
C. No.
Seventh Eh!hth Revised Sheet No. 21.2
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
only on any individual measure, and up to two times per dwelling. An incentive will be
provided a second time only on dwellings originally treated before October 1 , 1993.
In addition to the above reimbursements, Company will reimburse Agency 50% of the
cost of replacing a refrigerator plus $25 per refrigerator tested. Company will also
reimburse Agency 50% of CFL compact fluorescent light bulb and water saving
measure costs installed in homes that do not receive at least one Major Measure.
(Continued)
Submitted tInder Order No.".."".-""'."'..'-"-.-.'.'-.-"".'.""'.'..."'.m
...'.--.
.."".mmm
"..
'.m...'..m..
_"'..
lSSUKD: Se tember +2. 2005
Ad.v1€€ .-be-He;r:-Ne-,-OO-O (:)
~:FFEc'rlVE:November 150 200S tilimittet1--
..-
-l-J-H:f1€f
lSSlJEn: JUt:-/ 14 2000 F~'r (!L'2.:. A 0 1 5 ;;WOO
, '"
~Jo H,,
! .
~ 0
BlahRIA.
C. No. 28
Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.3
Canceling Fifth Sixth Revised Sheet No. 21.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - Continued
Financial Assistance (GHEfH-ltteflContinued
The Company will reimburse t:fte-!!.Agency!!. for administrative costs based on 15%
of Utah Power s rebate on installed measures, not to exceed the following total
administrative payment per building:when all "major measures" have been
installed, or are in place. Administrative reimbursen1ent will be made using the
follov:ing schedule:
Dwellin Units in Buildin
1 to 4
5 to 10
11 to 15
16 to 20
21 to 25
26 to 30
31+
Maximum UP &L Administrative Payment
$350
$800
$1200
$1400
$1600
$1800
$2100
The minimum rein1bursement will be $150 on homes with one or more Major Measure
installed and $50 on homes without the installation of a Maior Measure.
Agencies must invoice Company within sixty days of iob completion.
A maximum of $150,000 in Company reimbursements will be available annually
(April 1 through March 31).
Single Family Dv/elling
$150 total reimbursement
Duplex Dwelling
$15 0 reimbur~;ement
dv;elling units
$300 total reimbursement
Multi Family D\vellings
$150 base reimbursement
$ 25 per building
S1thmjIt. s~.!:,i.. IJn ~1G. rJ)I~tQLtIQ_
lSSlJED: September 2+.. 2005
A ,,1. '
' -
;.I.ib'-,
.__
,;)!f+
,,--,
!\. to,.. /\0 (fr;r",-, i:..
./",_
ctT'-I.- ,
j:"
'h:.r, -'b'\:t-t"
1'" II:' W'I:~
"".' ...
i!oN .i ..
' ,
N, ,1\ November 15, 200SgHl~mi4t€ft--lJHflE,"f
ISSFEI)I 4 ?OOQ
.~'
.I FFE(TIVI~'
("( "
1 C "11'\(\/\
, ,
;J , , , "
," ," "
t:~lL,~~M'tt
Blah01."
C. No. 28
Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.3
Canceling Fifth Sixth Revised Sheet No. 21.
$ 5 per dv/elling unit
Energy Conservation Measures
Financial assistance \-vill be provided based on the results of a cost effective analysis
through a Depmiment of Energy approved energy audit. The energy efficient measures
eligible for funding (Savings to Investment Ratio is 1.0 or greater) must be installed in
dwellings with pemlanendy installed operable electric space heat except where noted. The
energy efficient measures that may be eligible for funding are listed as follows:
Company approYed measure~; applicable for installation under the Low Income
'N eatheri zati on Program are listed below:
Major Measures - Electric Heating System Required A"!l of the following energy
conservation measures must be installed to the degree recommended below, or
financial assistance under the Lov: Income Program ~ill not be offered. If physical
barriers exist that prohibit the installation of a measure, then the measure is not
required as a condition for financial assistance under this schedule.
1a.Ceiling insulation up to R-4;8 for ceilings with less than R-30 in place. R-
30 or better attics will not be further insulated.
!Continued)
Continued)
S lJhrnitl~,dJ) Il~J (lr ~t9LNQ,
S. 1:1"
' '
1 )h" ,..J1J.'~
: ,.
eptemoer T.,~ t J
J'!.;1 "
~""""-..-,;:,
H.ox.,1\.; 1\/Jf';''ct:t'"n;;;",, X:.J",,"'1:t'-'J,- t~m,1-tjt..
I", 1 I~'!1?!1'Ii"
. ,
if !, ," n n if,Novernber 200S-btif3-n-RttM--:4-1:Ek3f
ISSlTI~n: Julv 14. 200(+-.-
.;
FFrg(TP/E
'\
;:sonG
' '
~: ixHgH~:;t
Blahnl.'N
C. No. 28
Seventh Ei2hth Revised Sheet No. 21.4
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.4
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - Continued
Energy Conservation Measures: (eontitttte-tlContinued
2b.Floor insulation up to R 30 for floors 'vith less than R 19 in place, unless a
superstructure would be needed to hold the insulation in place, in 'vhich case R
is the target. R 19 or better floors '":ill not be further insulated.over unheated
spaced up to R-30: 30 years..
46.
Wall insulation up to R-26 for walls with no insulation installed (financing will not
be available for the installation of urea-formaldehyde wall insulation)j: 30 years..
"!here single glass 'l:indows \''ith stOffi1S or double glass \vindows do not exist
storn1 ':indov/s or class 10 replacement 'yindows are required.Lo'll E \inylClass 40
replacement windows: 25 years..
Nothing shall preclude the Company from providing a reimbursement for the
installation of a greater R value on insulation for the above items that are determined to be
cost effective (s-Savings to Investment Ratio is 1.0 or greater) through the audit process.
Supplemental Measures - Electricatly Heateding System Required Homes:
I;!..Optional Measures: The follov/ing energy conservation measures are not required
n1easures under this schedule unless the measure is recommended as part of a major
measure~ such as attic ventilation with ceiling insulation or a ground co'/er and pipe
"Tap with floor insulation. Each measure in this section has been determined to
ahvays be cost effectiye.
Attic ventilation, excluding power ventilators, when installed with ceiling
insulation (required if needed at the time wffu-ceiling insulation is installed
).
Whole
house mechanical ventilation and spot ventilation for kitchen and baths at time
ceiling insulation is installed.7"- Always considered cost effective.
2b.Ground cover and water pipe wrap when installed with floor insulation; other vapor
barrier materials as required when installed with floor or ceiling insulation~
!:);:lw-ay-s-'€i-tn:si6~f€ft33jif11:-€:f-It.37ttve~(-1:t:!'qlffi~€,d-,i-t-~"Ht"e(k*i-wittt-f1Ho:r-+nffi:tla-tiHHt;
Sl1J~ Ini IJt':~lm I.Lnfot~I- Q Q 9I", N J~!.
ISSUED: September 2.L 2005
Adv1€ -e-be HBf "N+~:OO-
Jttf\' 14 If no
. , .. ..., . '-, . ~
fi:~ 1:' I::'IL~ 1 'jl,
; '-' -' ,
I, !!5,November 2005-S+Jmlittefl--lJnaef
BlahII.IN
C. No. 28
Seventh Eh!hth Revised Sheet No. 21.4
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.
3(7.'Neatherstripping and/or caulking.Forced air e1ecnic space heating duct insulation
and sealing in unheated spaces: 30 years..
4d.Vlater heater '.vrap on 'vater heater in unconditioned spaceWeather stripping and/or
caulking. including blower door assisted air sealing and duct sealing: Ahvays
considered cost effective..
5e.Timed thermostats on centrally controlled multi room heating systems. Heat
anticipating type thern10stats for zonal electric resistance heating systems. Zonal
thermostats must be separate from the heating unit and must be calibrated at the site
to 'liithin 2 F of actual room temperature in the range of 65e~eF-. Thermal doors~
30 years..
(Continued)
S1J lmJin ~ ~LLJDSJ s:..f... L? I ~l ~ r, _NQ
ISSUED: September 2+. 2005
f\(lV':i€B--be+.1B f--NH ;-09-
1;'!:;'i~'"IJ'I II:i'.11...,'\1..1."1,,11, fi,Novernber 200S&H+1Hlittet1---,t:4:1He-f
lSSl11'~n: Jttly_.FIi'Tr\1\ 1 ~()OO
, ,
U . . \;
, ,,' '
ugw;t
~ ~ "-. ,
Blahnl."
C. No. 28
ScvcBth Ei2hth Revised Sheet No. 21.5
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.5
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - Continued
Energy Conservation Measures : (E,,~fl-tiooe-Continued
Supplemental Measures - Electrically Heatinged HomesSystem Required (continued)
(B..Tim,ed thermostats on centrally controlled multi-room heating/cooling systems except when
used with heat pumps. Heat anticipating type thelmostats for zonal electric resistance
heating systems. Zonal thermostats must be separate trom the heating unit and must be
calibrated at the site to '.vithin 2OF of actual room temperature in the range of 65OF 75O
'\h';ays considered cost effecti';e.Recommended 14:easures: The follo'ving energy
conservation measures are not required measures under this schedule, nor are they deemed
to be always cost effective. However, they are recommended to achie/e maximum energy
efficiency.
Additional Measures - No Electric Heating System Requirement:
Pipe +insulation, energy efficient showerheads and aerators where electric water heaters are
resent a~'. . t..,
considered cost effective.
Compact fluorescent light bulbs applicable in all homes -limit 8 Energy Star certified bulbs
per home placed in fixtures that are on 2 hours or n1ore per day:-9 years.
Existing Refrigerators models with monitored results showing annual usage listed in the
Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance center database as ef-900 kWh or
greater
may be replaced with an Energy Star model with estimated annual consumption of 500 kWh
or less. Refrigerator usage will be monitored for a minimum of 72 hours. Replaced
refrigerators must be removed and recycled in accordance with EP A guidelines: 19 years..u. Forced air electric space heating duct insulation up to R lI on ducts with
less than R 3 in unheated spaced.
Thermal doors.
Provisions of Service for Energy Conservation Service to Low Income Customers
1JbmjLt~~LtID~t~r..QH:19I.._);9 0
EFFf::CTIV,November 15 , 2005S-HlR-r'B4,-ree.-,-f::.JndeflSSUKD: Septernber 2+. 2005
A ,
;',
C!.41 .aJ+""
:"'-_
1' 'L:._..t\()(\t'~
~ ,,~,_
Tj,--rt:t::I t:"4u. 'tt'tt t:t'tJ
ISSlTEH: JuI", 14. 2000 F~-'l'"' 11" 1 5 ~OQQ',;I : idJgUst ,
ulah
R IJlM
C. No. 28
SeveBth Ei2hth Revised Sheet No. 21.5
Canceling Sixth Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21.5
An Energy Audit must be completed by the Agency prior to installation of the
Major Measures by the Agency.
Agency must qualify residential customers for assistance using the Federal Low
Income guidelines.
Installation shall meet Federal, State and local building codes.
Measures installed under this schedule shall not receive financial incentives from
other Company programs.
5. Agency shall inspect the installation to insure that the weatherization meets or exceeds
required specifications.
(Continued)
Colnpany Inay audit l\.gency v/eathellzation and-financial records and inspect
the installations in dwellings of custonlcrs receiving weatherization under
this progn.llll.
Conlpany shall pay the f..gency the mnount estaWished-flflGeF-the tenns of
their contract v/hen provisions of this sc1~aYe been nlet.
ELECTRIC SER,TICE RECULATIONS: Service under this schedule is
subject to the-Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file witlHmd
approved by the-Maho Public Utilities Commission incffiding future~e amendments and-additional regulations prescribed by regulatory
authorities.
ii~!:bm.i 'tt.~~t!JD~tGI.._Qr~i,9I,,_
'I TiIJ'I"1 )h" l.11..,- eptc,U1Der T.,-
Ae-v1ee-fJet 4t"r--NfJ-t)'()-f~6
" ( :~
, ' I
,.." ,;".
November 1 5 0 0 5 &Ltf)I-HtH€t1---lf-Frat'f
lS~l 1" 14 )(\nl\
,....
J" Lt.
.~:
tt:ttr----
'" ~"'
F~'TlVE-:--. 1 5
'"'
1.,UgUst f";:t't::t
Blah
HIBl"
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 21.6
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 21 - (Continued)
Provisions of Service for Energy Conservation Service to Low Income Customers:
.(
Continued)
Company may audit Agency weatherization and financial records and inspect the
installations in dwellings of customers receiving weatherization under this program.
Company shall pay the Agency the amount established under the terms of their
contract when provisions of this schedule have been met.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this schedule is subiect to the Electric
Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission.
including future applicable amendments and additional regulations prescribed by regulatory authorities.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: tember 2 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
ulah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Ori inal Sheet No. 115.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115
STATE OF IDAHO
Commercial and Industrial Enere:y Efficiency Incentives
.QID:ional for Oualifyine: Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this Schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in Commercial Buildings and Industrial
Facilities through the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s General Service Schedules 6. 6A. 8. 9.
12. 17. 19. 23. 23A. 24. 35 and 35A in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
This Schedule is applicable to new and existing Commercial Buildings and Industrial Facilities.
dairy barns served under the Company s residential rate schedules and traffic signals.
DEFINITIONS:
Commercial Building:: A structure that is served by Company and meets the
applicability requirements of this tariff at the time an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement/Application is executed or approved by the Company which does not
meet the definition of an Industrial Facility.
Customer: Any party who has applied for. been accepted and receives service at
the real property. or is the electricity user at the real property.
Ener2Y Efficiencv Incentive: Payments of money made by Company to Owner
or Customer for installation of an Energy Efficiency Measure pursuant to an
executed Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or ap?roved Application.
Energ:y Efficiency Incentive Ag:reement/ Application: An agreement between
Owner or Customer and Company or a Company provided application submitted
by the Owner or Customer and approved by the Company providing for Company
to furnish Energy Efficiency Incentives with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this Tariff Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued\
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Energ.v Efficiency Measure (EEM): A permanently installed measure which
can improve the efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use.
Ener2Y Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New Construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of energy efficiency
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficiency equipment or
modification.
In the case of both new construction and retrofits. EEM Costs shall mean the
Owner or Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any discounts. rebates or
incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives from the Company. or other
consideration that reduces the final actual EEM Cost incurred by the Owner or
Customer) to purchase and install EEMs at the Owner s or Customer s facility. If
the owner or customer installs the EEM then the cost of installation shall be equal
to the Owner s or Customer s actual labor costs for such installation.
Ener2Y Efficiency Project: One or more EEMW with similar one year payback
limitations (Page 3). covered by one Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved application.
Industrial Facility: Buildings and process eqJ!ipment associated with
manufacturing.
Mixed Use: Buildings served by a residential rate schedule and a rate schedule
listed under Applicable shall be eligible for services under this schedule provided
the Energy Efficiency Proiect meets the definition of New Construction or where
the Company adiusts the baseline energy consumption and costs.
New construction: A newly constructed facility or newly constructed square
footage added to an existing facility.
J Continuedl
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued1
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Owner: The person who has both legal and beneficial title to the real property.
and is the mortgager under a duly recorded mortgage of real property. the trustor
under a duly recorded deed of trust.
Retrofit: Changes. modifications or additions to systems or equipment in existing
facility square footage.
INCENTIVE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES: The Company will
provide Energy Efficiency Incentives per the Provisions of Service to participating Owners or
Customers who have installed EEMs listed in the tables in this schedule or are eligible for an
Energy Efficiency Incentive per the formula listed below.
Energy Efficiency Proiects consisting of Retrofit lighting EEMs (listed & not listed)~
or Retrofit EEMs are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided the simple payback
(based on electricity cost savings) before incentives is one year or more. EEMs with simQk
paybacks before incentives of less than one year are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives
provided the Energy Efficiency Proiect has a simple payback before incentives of one year or
more. Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be available to reduce the simple payback of an
Energy Efficiency Proiect below one year. If required. individual EEM Energy Efficiency
Incentives will be adiusted downward pro-rata so the Energy Efficiency Proiect has a simple
payback after incentives of one year or more. Retrofit motor and HV AC EEMs (listed & not
listed) are not subiect to the payback limitations listed above.
EEMs not listed in the incentive tables may be eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives.
Electric savings resulting from lighting interaction with mechanical eQIDPment will not be
eligible for an Energy Efficiency Incentive. The Company will complete an analysis of the EEM
Cost and electric energy savings and determine at its sole option whether to offer an Energy
Efficiency Incentive and the Energy Efficiency Incentive amount. Energy Efficiency Incentives
for such EEMs will be the lesser of W the product of multiplYing the Company s estimate of
annual energy savings by $0.08/kWh; or (Q) 35% of the EEM Cost as determined by the
Company.
Company may adiust baseline electric energy consumption and costs to reflect any of the
following: energy codes. standard practice. changes in capacity. changes in production or facility
use and equipment at the end of its useful life. Such adiustments may be made for lighting energy
efficiency measures installed in new construction proiects where energy code does not apply.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulah
RIJIM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued!
INCENTIVE FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES: (Continued!
F or existing fixtures. the baseline for all fluorescent lighting Energy Efficiency Measures
not listed in incentive Table 1 shall be the lesser of existing equipment or the energy efficient
magnetic ballast and energy saving lamp combination as listed in the lighting table available on
the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company web site.
Except for motors and mechanical energy efficiency measures listed in Tables 2 and 3.
Lighting Energy Efficiency Measures listed in Table 1 in New Construction proiects and
incentives for EEMs not listed (QJ). EEM Energy Efficiency Incentives shall not exceed 50% of
the EEM Cost.
All EEM Costs are subiect to Company review and approval prior to offering an Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approving Energy Efficiency Incentive Application. All final
EEM Costs are subiect to Company review and approval prior to paving an Energy Efficiency
Incentive per the terms of the Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
Company review and awroval of EEM Costs may require additional documentation from the
Customer or Owner.
The Owner or Customer may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive from the
Company per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:ill Company may elect to offer EEM incentives through different channels and at
different points in the sales process other than individual Energy Efficiency
Incentive AgreementCi) or Applications prior to EEM purchase. The differences
will depend on EEM or proi ect type and will be consistent for all EEMs or
proiects of similar tyPe. Incentive requirements by EEM or ?roiect type and other
terms and conditions will be available on the Idaho energy efficiency program
section of the Company s web site. Changes in incentive requirements and/or
terms and conditions may be changed by the Company with at least 60 days notice
on the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company s web site.
Customer/Owner has the option to receive a signed Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or request approval of an Application direct from the Company prior
to purchase of eligible EEMs.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
ulilh
glJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continuedl
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continuedlill Company will employ a variety of quality assurance techniques during the
delivery of the program. They will differ by EEM and may include pre and post
installation instJections. phone surveys. and confirmation of customer and~ment eligibility.
Company may verify or evaluate the energy savings of installed EEMs. This
verification may include a telephone survey. site visit. review of plant operation
characteristics. and pre- and post-installation of monitoring equipment and as
necessary to quantify actual energy savings.
ill
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS Service under this Schedule will be in
accordance with the terms of the Electric Service Agreement between the Customer and the
Company. The Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the
Idaho Public Utility Commission. including future applicable amendments. will be considered as
forming a part of and incorporated in said Agreement.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
BlahHI."
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade t04'1 or 2 T12 lam 1 ma netic4'lor2T8Iam s+lEB
Standard T8 Fixtures Standard T8 ballast
lam s and electronic ballasts 4' -3 or 4 T12 lam + MB
with ballast factor (BF)-=::0.3 or 4 T12lam s + MB
or 4 T12 HONHO lam
MB(s)
4' - 3 or 4 T8lam s+IEB $10
8' - 123 or 4 T8lam s +IEB see note 6 li.Q
+ 8' - or 4 T8 HONHO lam s +EB $15
maximum of 2 EB see note 6
Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade to 4'
Premium T8 Fixtures s with
initial lumens ~31O0 or watta e -=::30
electronic ballasts with BF -=::0.
4' - 1 or 2 TI2Iam + MB or standard 4' - 1 or 2 Premium T8 lam + EBT8Iam+ EB
4' - 3 or 4 T12 lam s + MB or standard or remmm s +s +
8' - 1 or 2 T12 lam + ener efficient 4' 2 3 4 P T81
netic ballast
or remmm s +
Fluorescent Delam and Standard
T8 Fixture Upgrade Standard T8
lam s and electronic ballasts
with BF -=::0.88 - Fixture removal is
not eli ible
4' - 1 Standard T8 lam + lEB4' -2 T12 la s + 1 MB
3 T12la s + 2 MB
4 T12la s + 2 MB
4' -4 T12 lam s + 2 MB
Fluorescent Delam and Premium 4'2 T12lam s + 1 MB
T8 Fixture Upgrade Lam s with
initial lumens ~31O0 or watta e -=::30 4' -3 T12 lam s + 2 MB
electronic ballasts with BF -=::0.8. 4'4 T12 lam s + 2 MBFixture removal is not eli ible
4' - 2 or 1 Standard T8 lam + lEB
4' - 3 Standard T8lam s + lEB
4' - 2 or 1 Standard T8 lam + lEB
4' - I-Premium T8 la + lEB
4' - 2 or I-Premium T8 lam + lEB
4' - 3-Premium T8 lam s + lEB
4 T12lam s + 2 MB
Com act Fluorescent Li htin
g (
CFL Incandescent
4' - 2 or I-Premium T8lam + lEB
dOW nomina CFL hardwire fixture
Incandescent
li.Q
ill.
$20
$10
ill.
$15
$25
ill.
$20
$20
$30
$10
Incandescent ~20W nomina CFL hardwire fixture
~lOW
, -=::
20W (nominal) CFL hardwire fixture $15
3 - T5HO lam nominal 4'+ EB - Hi h Bav $70
4 or 6 - T5HO lam nominal 4'+ EB Hi h $75
Bav
or 3 - T5 lam nominal 4'& lEB $20nterior fixtures
2 - T5 HO lam nominal 4'& 1 EB interior
fixtures $20
Incandescent
Incandescent
-=::40W two- iece screw-in CFL
Sin le-iece screw in CFL all watta
T5 Fluorescent Fixture Upgrade ~250 W MH MV or HPS
~ 400 W MH or HPS
or 3 T12lam s + ma netic
ballast
4' 4 T8 or T12la s + ma netic
ballast
(Continued),
$20
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
ulahHI."
IoP.C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continuedl
h Intensit Dischar
HID pgrades
Based on lam watta
?40W and -:::::120W incandescent or tun sten ?35W and -:::::1O0W Ceramic Metal Halide
400 W Ceramic Metal Halide
$25
$100
$120
? 175W and -:::::320W Pulse Start MH $80
?320W and -:::::400W Pulse Start MH $100
?400W and -:::::750W Pulse Start Metal Halide $120
4' - 4 lam h Ba T8 fixture $50
4' - 6 lam h Ba T8 fixture $50
4' 8 lam h Ba T8 fixture $100
~t Emittin ?de LED or Electro $15
lumInescent EXIt SI n - 1 or 2 faced
Wall or Ceilin Mounted Occu anc Sensor $30
er sensor
Inte al occu anc sensor
Photocell er sensor
Time clock er contro
LED Green Ball
LED Yellow and Green Ball
LED Green Arrow 2" or 8"
LED Don t Walk
LED Walk
$25
$20
$20
$40
$80
$30
$50
$20
?400W MH MV or HPS
?750W MH or HPS
?250W and -:::::320W Ceramic Metal Halide
Exit Si
?1O0W and
-:::::
250W M or HPS ?125W and d75W Pulse StartMH
-:::::500W incandescent
::-250W and
-:::::
400W MH or HPS
::- 400W or HPS
? 1 OOOW MV or HPS
::- 250 W
-:::::
400 W MH or HPS
::- 400 W or HPS
::-1000 W M MV or HPS
Incandescent or fluorescent exit si
htin Controls Wall switch or no control
Traffic li ht upgrades
No control
No control
No control
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
Incandescent
Notes for Table 1:
Incentives are capped at 50 percent of EEM Costs except for Lighting EEMs listed above installed in New Construction.
2' U-tube lamps may be substituted for 4' linear fluorescent lamps in the above table
For retrofits of existing equipment, lighting incentives will be paid on a one-for-one equipment replacement basis. If fixture counts
are changing, the project may be considered under the approach for measures not listed (see page 3).
The total connected interior lighting power for New Construction projects required to comply with the energy code must be 10
percent lower than the interior lighting power allowance calculated under the current version of the Idaho energy code. The date of
the building permit application shall establish the current version of the Code. For New Construction projects not required to
comply with the energy code, the total connected lighting power must be 10% lower than common practice as determined by the
Company.
Incentives for the following equipment types are not available for New Construction projects
Standard T8 fixtures
Fixture de-Iamping
* LED Exit signs
One or two piece screw-in CFL fixtures
Lighting controls required under the current version of the Idaho energy code. The date of the building permit application shall
establish the current version of the Code.
6 Eight-foot T8s, T8 HONHO and High Bay T-8 electronic ballasts are required to have a BF-::::: 1.2 to be eligible for incentives.
Lighting equipment listed only in the "Replace" column of Table 1 is not eligible for incentives.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
BlahHIA"
P .C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continuedl
Table 2 - NEMA Premium Efficiencv Motors
~ ~
$45 82.5 82.5 85.5 85.5 77.0 77.
$45 86.5 87.5 86.5 86.5 84.0 84.
$54 87.5 88.5 86.5 86.5 85.5 85.$54 88.5 89.5 89.5 89.5 85.5 86.$54 89.5 89.5 89.5 89.5 86.5 88.$81 90.91.0 91.0 91.7 88.5 89.10 $90 91.7 91.0 91.7 91.7 89.5 90.
15 $104 91.7 91.7 93.92.4 90.91.020 .$.lll 92.4 91.7 93.0 93.91.0 91.025 $117 93.0 93.0 93.6 93.91.7 91.730 $135 93.6 93.0 94.1 93.91.7 91.740 $162 94.1 94.1 94.1 94.92.4 92.450 $198 94.1 94.1 94.5 94.5 93.0 93.
60 $234 94.5 94.5 95.0 95.0 93.6 93.75 $270 94.5 94.5 95.95.4 93.6 93.100 $360 95.0 95.95.4 95.4 93.6 94.125 $540 95.0 95.95.4 95.4 94.1 95.
150 $630 95.4 958 95.8 95.8 94.1 95.200 $630 95.4 95.8 95.8 96.2 95.95.4
Notes for Table 2:
1) Motors larger than 200 horsepower are not a listed measure and may be eligible under the approach for measures not listed
(see page 3).
2) The NEMA Premium efficiency ratings listed are nominal full-load efficiency ratings. Motors that meet or exceed these
efficiency requirements may qualify for an incentive.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued\
ec amca ner Iclenc easures
~,.. ...... ........
Unitary Commercial 0::::65.000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package 15.0 SEER 210/240 $50
Air Conditioners.12.5 EER
Air Cooled ;:::.65.000 Btu/hr and 0::::Split System and Single Package 11.0 EER $50
(Cooling Mode)135.000 Btu/hr 11.4 IPL V
;:::. 135.000 Btu/hr and Split System and Single Package 10.8 EER 340/360 $50
0:::: 240.000 Btulhr 11.2 IPL V
;:::. 240.000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package 10.0 EER $50
10.4 IPLV
Unitary Commercial 0:::: 135.000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package 14.0 EER 210/240 $50
Air Conditioners.
Water and Evaporatively ;:::. 135.000 Btulhr 14.0 EER 340/360 $50
Cooled
Package Terminal Air 0:::: 8.000 Btu/hr Single Package 11.8 EER $50
Conditioners (PT AC)3 COP Heating
(Heating & Cooling Mode);:::. 8.000 and 0:::: 10.500 Single Package 11.4 EER $50
Btu/hr 2 COP Heating
;:::.
10.500 and 0:::: 13.500 Single Package 10.7 EER $50
Btulhr 1 COP Heating 310/380
;:::.
13.500 Btu/hr Single Package 10.0 EER $50
0 COP Heating
Heat Pumps.0:::: 65.000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package 13.0 SEER 210/240 $50
Air Cooled ;:::. 65.000 Btu/hr and 0::::Split System and Single Package 11.0 EER $50
(Cooling Mode)135.000 Btu/hr 11.4 IPL V
;:::. 135.000 Btu/hr and Split System and Single Package 10.8 EER 340/360 $50
0:::: 240.000 Btu/hr 11.2 IPL V
;:::. 240.000 Btulhr Split System and Single Package 10.0 EER $50
10.4 IPLV
Heat Pumps.0:::: 65.000 Btulhr Split System 0 HSPP See note 3 below
Air Cooled Single Package 5 HSPP See note 3 below(Heating Mode)
;:::. 65.000 Btu/hr and 0::::47OP. db /43OP. wb Outdoor Air 4 COP See note 3 below340/360135.000 Btulhr 17OP. db /15OP. wb Outdoor Air 2.4 COP See note 3 below
;:::. 135.000 Btu/hr 47OP. db /43OP. wb Outdoor Air 3.3 COP See note 3 below
17OP. db /15OP. wb Outdoor Air 2 COP 340/360 See note 3 below
Heat Pumps. Water Source 0:::: 135.000 Btulhr 85OP. Entering water 14.0 EER 320 $50
(Cooling Mode)
Heat Pumps. Water Source 0:::: 135.000 Btulhr 70oP. Entering water 6 COP 320 See note 3 below
(Heating Mode)
T bl 3 . IE Effi .
(Continued 1
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulilhRI."
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 115.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 115 (Continued)
Pro ammable Thermostats $5 O/thermostat
labeled $70/thermostat
Variable fre uenc drives
VFD
HV AC fans and
Bevera e or refri erated
dis machine occu anc
sensor
-::: 100 HV AC fans or HV AC fans and See notes 4 and 5 below $80/h
Bevera e vendin
refri erated dis machine
occu anc sensor
$75/sensor
Notes for Table 3:
1) For retrofits of existing equipment. incentives are for one-for-one same size equipment replacements. Exception: PTACs
can replace electric resistive heating. which must be removed.
2) Equipment that meets or exceeds all efficiency requirements listed for the size category in the above table may qualify for an
incentive.
3) Incentives for heat pumps are $50 per ton of cooling capacity ONLY. No incentives are paid per ton of heating capacity.
Heat Pumps must meet QQfu...lhe cooling mod~heating mo~e efficiency requirements to qualify for per ton cooling
efficiency incentives.
4) Throttling or bypass devices. such as inlet vanes. bypass dampers. three-way valves. or throttling valves must be removed or
permanently disabled to qualify for HV AC fan and pump VFD incentives.
5) For New Construction. incentives are not available for HV AC fan and pump VFDs required by current version of the Idaho
energy code
6) SEER = Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio EER = Energy Efficiency Ratio COP = Coefficient of Performance
HSPF = Heating Seasonal Performance Factor IPL V = Integrated Part Load Value
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 117.
UT AH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 117
STATE OF IDAHO
Residential Refrieerator Recvcline Proeram
PURPOSE: Service under this tariff is intended to decrease residential refrigeration loads
through the removal and recycling of inefficient models.
APPLICABLE: To existing residential customers in all territory served by the Company in
the State of Idaho billed on Schedule 1. Landlords who own appliances in rental properties served
by the company in the State of Idaho where the tenant is billed under Schedule 1 also qualify for
this program. This tariff will expire August 1. 2007.
CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION: Customer participation is voluntary and is initiated by
contacting a specified toll-free telephone number or website.
DESCRIPTION: Customers receive a $40 incentive to discontinue use of their working
second refrigerators and/or freezers or to replace their working primary refrigerators and freezers
with new more energy efficient models. To qualify for the incentive customers must give up their
appliances for recycling. Awliances will be collected and recycled to ensure they are not resold on
the secondary market. Company will offer a packet with written energy efficiency information and
instant savings measures.
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT: Working refrigerators and freezers that are a minimum of
10 cubic feet in size. utilizing inside measurements.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: Incentives will be available on a maximum of two
mwliances per qualifying household. Incentive checks will be mailed within 30 days of the
appliance collection date.
,(
Continued 1
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
BlahRIAlr
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 117.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 117 - (Continued),
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continuedl
Incentives are also available to landlords that own the appliances used in rental properties in
Utah Power s Idaho service territory where their tenant is billed on a residential schedule.
Landlords may receive incentives on a maximum of two appliances per unit.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this schedule will be
accordance with the terms of the Electric Service Agreement between the Customer and the
Company. The Electric Service Regulations of the Company on file with and approved by the
Idaho Public Utilities Commission. including future applicable amendments. will be considered as
forming a part of and incorporated in said Agreement.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28
TkirdFourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling Seeoad Third- Revised Sheet No. 120.
UT AH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 120
STATE OF IDAHO
NO NEW SERVICE
Commercial Energy Services
Optional to Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to reduce the energy requirements of new
Commercial Buildings and existing Commercial Buildings undergoing Major Renovation by promoting the
installation of Energy Conservation Measures.
APPLICABLE: Conservation Payments are not avaiJable to Owners after Novelnber 15. 2005.
The restriction on new service does not affect payment of Energy Service Charges currently required and
obligations pursuant to an executed Energy Services Contract remain in effect until the Conservation
Pavment with interest is re-paid in full.
This program is applicable to service to new Commercial Buildings larger than 12 000 square feet
and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation under General Service Electric Service
Schedules in the State of Idaho. Warehouses and other New Commercial Buildings and existing
commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be suitable for a
prescriptive approach are excluded from this program and are included under Schedule 122.
Charges under this schedule will be in addition to the electric service charge under the Customer
applicable electric service schedule. THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER TillS SCHEDULE WILL APPLY
TO ALL CUSTOMERS USING ELECTRICITY AT THE REAL PROPERTY SPECIFIED BY AN
ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005
2005
Submitted Under Adyice Letter No. 00 06
EFFECTIVE:November 15.
ISSUED July 11 2000 EFFECTIVE: August 15 , 2000
ulah
nlJlM
C. No. 28
Third Fourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling SeeoRd Third- Revised Sheet No. 120.
DESCRIPTION: Service under this program is available to improve the energy efficiency of New
Commercial Buildings larger than 12 000 square feet and existing Commercial Buildings undergoing Major
Renovation to be connected to Company s system on or after the effective date of this schedule.
Company 'l:ill provide the Conservation Payments for incremental construction 'yhich result in the
installation of Energy Conservation 14easl:lres. Upon connection of electric service to commercial buildings
having such measures installed under this program, Company '1/ill bill the Custonler an Energy Service
Charge as specified by this Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005
2005
Submitted Under ,lice Letter No. 00 06
EFFECTIVE:November 15.
ISSUED July 14 2000 EFFECTIVE: ,ugust 15 , 2000
ulahRIAlr
C. No. 28
TkirdFourth Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling SeeoRd Third -Revised Sheet No. 120.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 120 - Continued
DESCRIPTION: (Continuedl
The Company will provide the Conservation Payments for incremental construction which result in the
installation of Energy Conservation Measures. Upon connection of electTic service to commercial buildings
having such measures installed under this program. Company will bill the Customer an Energy Service
Charge as specified by this Schedule
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kWh savings resulting from installation of the Energy
Conservation Measures, as estimated by Company using engineering analysis.
Baseline Level: Electric energy use estimated to occur from compliance with current commercial
building code requirements for New Commercial Buildings or from implementation of the Owner s building
plans initially presented to Company, whichever is less.
Conservation Payments: Any payments of money made by Company to Owner for installation of
Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to an Energy Services Contract. If the Company has assisted in
implementing the Energy Conservation Measures, Conservation Payments also shall include Company
direct costs of such implementation, including the cost of materials, installation, and ongoing support as
specified in the Energy Services Contract. Conservation Payments shall be either:
(a)Level l Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which do not exceed the
Measure Funding Limit.
(b)Level 2 Conservation Payments
--
Conservation Payments which exceed the Measure
Funding Limit. The Level 2 Conservation Payments may not exceed, for any Energy
Services Contract, the amount of the Level l Conservation Payments nor shall the
maximum Level 2 Conservation Payments for any individual Conservation Measure be
more than three times the applicable Measure Funding Limit.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at the real property
identified in the Energy Services Contract.
Energy Conservation Measures: Permanently installed measures specified in an Energy Services
Contract, which can reduce the Customer s electric energy use.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005
Letter No. 00 06
EFFECTIVE :November IS 2005Submitted Under Advioe
ISSUED July 14 2000 EFFECTIVE: ..ugust 15 2000
Blah
lUMII'
C. No. 28
Third FouI1h Revised Sheet No. 120.
Canceling 8eeoRd Third -Revised Sheet No. 120.
Energy Services Contract: A contract between Owner and Company providing for Company to
furnish or provide Conservation Payments with respect to Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to this
tariff Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2,2005
Letter No. 00 06
EFFECTIVE :November 2005 Submitted Under /\d'/ioe
ISSUED July 14 2000 EFFECTIVE: /'..ugust 15 2000
...
ulah
HIJIl.'
C. No. 28
Third Fourth -Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling Second Third- Revised Sheet No. 122.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 122
STATE OF IDAHO
NO NEW SERVICE
Commercial Energy Services
Optional to Qualifying Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to reduce the energy requirements of certain
commercial buildings by promoting the installation of Energy Conservation Measures through a prescriptive
approach.
APPLICABLE: Conservation Payments are not available to Owners after Noven1ber . 2005.
The restriction on new service does not affect payment of Energy Service Charges currently required and
obligations pursuant to an executed Energy Services Contract remain in effect until the Conservation
Payment with interest is re-paid in full.
This program is applicable to service under the General Service Electric Service Schedules in the
State of Idaho to New Commercial Buildings and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major
Renovation with 12 000 square feet or less, new warehouses, and other New Commercial Buildings and
existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be suitable for
prescriptive approach.
Charges under this schedule will be in addition to the electric service charge under the Customer
applicable electric service schedule. THE OBLIGATIONS UNDER TillS SCHEDULE WILL APPLY
TO ALL CUSTOMERS USING ELECTRICITY AT THE REAL PROPERTY SPECIFIED BY AN
ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT.
DESCRIPTION: Service under this program is available to improve the energy efficiency of New
Commercial Buildings with 12 000 square feet or less, new warehouses, and other New Commercial
Submitted Under Order No.
S' "!I.-)iL
: ,
eptem)er_
' )
l:,e-tte:r:-NH-;-OO-tl()
!r'K~IPIl""'l''a:;-JI.~d.I!J .11 ,I, '
;~ :
November 2005S-!:+!:m1tt;tet::4:~Hd€T-Aa.vi-ee
ISSlrl'~J I '1 j )000lL:J
.~"
KFFEf'+I\TE' B~ltlc't 1 ~ ""000
"'".. "
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28
Third Fourth -Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling SecoRd Third- Revised Sheet No. 122.
Buildings and existing commercial buildings undergoing Major Renovation determined by Company to be
suitable for a prescriptive approach. This program will utilize a prescriptive approach. Company will
provide to Owner a menu of recommended Energy Conservation Measures. From this menu, Owner will
select the specific Energy Consen'ation Measures which are to be installed in O'vner s ComIllercial Building
and for '.vhich the Company \\'ill provide Conservation Payments. Upon connection of electric service to
cOl11ll1ercial buildings ha'ving such measures instal1ed under this program, Company \vi11 bill the Custon1er
an Energy Service Charge as specified by this Schedule.
(Continued)
Subrnitted tinder Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005
1:,e-ti,*-~:FNf:J:'O (f-Of)
EFFECTlVE:November 2005S-ttmiH:€-&--b'Fldef -i\ttVtB-B
ISSl'~'n. /1 ')(\l\U\,
'"
FJi':fI\
'- ')\(\. .
J ,
. . . .
' A ugust
BlahIIBl!r
C. No.
Third Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling Second Third Revised Sheet No. 122.
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 122 -= iContinuedl
DESCRIPTION: (€Continued)
select the specific Energv Conservation Measures which are to be installed in O'Amer s COlmnercial Building
and for which the Con1pany will provide Conservation Payments. Upon connection of elecuic service
commercial buildings having such measures installed under this progran1. COlllpany will bill the Customer
an Energy Service Charge as specified by this Schedule.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savings: The annual kWh savings resulting from installation of the Energy
Conservation Measures, as estimated by Company using engineering analysis.
Conservation Payments: Any payments of money made by Company to Owner for installation of
Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to an Energy Services Contract. Conservation Payments shall be
either:
(a)Levell Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which do not exceed the Measure
Funding Limit.
(b)Level 2 Conservation Payments -- Conservation Payments which exceed the Measure
Funding Limit. The Level 2 Conservation Payments may not exceed, for any Energy
Services Contract, the amount of the Level l Conservation Payments nor shall the
maximum Level 2 Conservation Payments for any individual Conservation Measure be
more than three times the applicable Measure Funding Limit.
Customer: Any party who has applied for, been accepted and receives service at the real property
identified in the Energy Services Contract.
Energy Conservation Measures: Permanently installed measures specified in an Energy Services
Contract, which can reduce the Customer s electric energy use.
Energy Services Contract: A contract between Owner and Company providing for Company to
furnish or provide Conservation Payments with respect to Energy Conservation Measures pursuant to this
tariff Schedule.
Submitted Under Order No.
S! T Ii:i' f 1. It" ,,')1:'::
: _
eptemoer.. J
beHt'r-J\JH'
~---
O~-O()
KFFECTIV~: :Novenlber 15 , 2005&-clBHH.trett..---).nG€'f,-At=h,lte€
18Slrli'\,' 14 ?f(WJ,-. .4. . ,u. "
. ~ j , ,.;
FFFEf'TIVE' A unu"t 15 '100P
..." ,(:")
Blah
R IJiM
C. No. 28
Third Fourth Revised Sheet No. 122.
Canceling Second Third Revised Sheet No. 122.
Major Renovation: Replacement of the major components of the building s envelope which must
include replacement measures for over 50 percent of all external window or uninsulatable wall area.
Melded Interest Rate: An interest rate which is the sum of the interest rates specified in (a) and
(b) below--
(Continued)
Subrnitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: SeQ1fIT1her 2. 200S
72-tk:.r -~N 1::)-:--OO-.\J &
EFFEC'l'IVE:November IS 200Sb-ultn=Httea-t+H*'f--Adv-tB.e
18SlTIi~14 )~m(
...'-,~, .
It.
,~
r--.I EFF~"+I\
!\
1 ~ '1000i1..Ugt!St ~
~"-' .
ulah
R IJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125
STATE OF IDAHO
Commercial and Industrial Ener2Y Efficiency Incentives
Optional for Oualifyin2 Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in Commercial and Industrial Facilities
by promoting the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s General Service Schedules 6. 6A.
9. 17. 19. 23. 23A. 24. 35. and 35A. in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
This Schedule is not applicable to existing Commercial Buildings under 20.000 square feet.
Sguare footage is the total Building or Facility area served by the Company s meterW. This
schedule is applicable to dairy barns served on the Company s residential rate schedules.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savin2s: The annual kilowatt-hour (kWh) savings resulting from
installation of the Energy Efficiency Measures. as estimated by Company using
engineering analysis.
Avera2e Monthlv On Peak kW Savin2s: The Average Monthly On Peak
kilowatt (kID savings resulting from the installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures as estimated by Company using engineering analysis as described
below:
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings = (baseline average monthly On Peak kW
:..illQPosed average monthly On Peak kW). where;
Average monthly On Peak k W = sum of the 12 Monthly Maximum On Peak
kW/12. where;
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
ulah
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
=?
Monthly Maximum On Peak kW = highest of all 15 minute average kW
determined below) for On Peak hours. On Peak hours are those hours
specified in the electric service schedule under which the customer receives
electric service.
=?
15 minute average kW = sum of kWh used over 0.25 hrs/0.25 hrs
Baseline Level:
Baseline Adjustments: Company may adiust baseline electric energy
consumption and costs during engineering analysis to reflect any of the
following: energy codes. standard practice. changes in capacity. changes in
production or facility use and equipment at the end of its useful life. For
existing fixtures. baseline wattages for all fluorescent lighting Energy
Efficiency Measures in all facilities shall be the lesser of existing
equipment or the energy efficient magnetic ballast and energy savings
lamp combination listed in the lighting table available on the Idaho energy
efficiency program section of the Company web site.
Commercial Building: A structure that is served by Company and meets the
applicability requirements of this tariff at the time an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement is executed or Application is approved which does not meet the
definition of an Industrial Facility.
Commissioning: The process of verifying and documenting that the performance
of electric energy using systems meets the design intent and Owner s operational
requirement.
Customer: Any party who has applied for. been accepted and receives service at
the real property. or is the electricity user at the real property.
Enen!y Efficiency Incentive: Payment of money made by Company to Owner or
Customer for installation of Energy Efficiency Measures pursuant to an executed
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
(Continuedl
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
Blah
R lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Enerey Efficiency Incentive Aereement/Application: An agreement between
Owner or Customer and Company or a Company provided application submitted
by the Owner or Customer and approved by the Company providing for Company
to furnish Energy Efficiency Incentive with respect to Energy Efficiency Measures
pursuant to this tariff Schedule.
Enerey Efficiency Measure (EEM): Permanently installed measure specified in
an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application which can
improve the efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use. EEMs designed to
primarily reduce Average Monthly On Peak k W must also reduce electric energy
use to be eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives.
Energ"v Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Major renovation: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the code compliance/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficiency equipment or
modification.
In the case of New Construction. Maior Renovation and Retrofits. EEM Costs
shall mean the Owner or Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any
discounts. rebates or incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives from the
Company. or other consideration that reduces the final actual EEM Cost incurred
by the Owner or Customer) to purchase and install EEMs at the Owner or
Customer s facility. If the Owner or Customer installs the EEM then the cost of
installation shall be equal to the Owner s or Customer s actual labor costs for such
installation.
Enerey Efficiency Project:
One or more EEMW covered by one Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application.
,(
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
BlahnlDiIl
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Industrial Facility: Buildings and process equipment associated with
manufacturing.
Mixed Use: Buildings served by a residential rate schedule and a rate schedule
listed under Applicable shall be eligible for services under this schedule provided
the Energy Efficiency Proiect meets the definition of New Construction or Maior
Renovation.
New Construction: A newly constructed facility or newly constructed square
footage added to an existing facility.
Major Renovation: Changes. modifications or additions to existing facility
systems or equipment that involve substantial removal and replacement with new
systems or equipment where such changes. modifications or additions are required
to comply. with energy code. replace equipment at the end of its useful life. add
capacity or change the use of the facility.
Owner: The person who has both legal and beneficial title to the real property
specified in an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application
who is the mortgagor under a duly recorded mortgage or the grantor under a duly
recorded deed of trust or a purchaser under a duly recorded agreement with
respect to such real property.
Retrofit: Changes. modifications or additions to systems or equipment in
existing facility square footage.
Supplemental Services Aereement: An agreement between Owner or Customer
and Company providing for Company to furnish Supplemental Services with
respect to Supplemental Services section of this Tariff Schedule.
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS:
Enerey Efficiency Incentives: Energy Efficiency Incentives made by the
Company for installation of EEMs pursuant to an Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application shall be the lesser of the sum of (ill and (Q1
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulah
RIJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued),
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued),
(b)
$0.12/kWh for the Annual kWh savings as determined using Company
provided or approved engineering analysis;
$50/kW for Average Monthly On Peak kW savings determined using
Company provided or approved engineering analysis.
50% of the EEM Cost as determined by the Company.
(a)
(c)
Energy Efficiency Proiects are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided
the simple payback (based on electricity cost savings) before incentives is one
year or more. EEMs with simple paybacks before incentives of less than one year
are eligible for Energy Efficiency Incentives provided the Energy Efficiency
Proiect has a simple payback before incentives of one year or more.
Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be available to reduce the simple payback of
an Energy Efficiency Proiect below one year. If required. individual EEM Energy
Efficiency Incentives will be adjusted downward pro-rata so the Energy Efficiency
Proiect has a simple payback after incentives of one year or more.
All proposed Energy Efficiency Measure costs are subiect to Company review and
approval prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approving
an Application. All final Energy Efficiency Measure costs are subject to Company
review and approval prior to paying an Energy Efficiency Incentive per the terms
of an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application. Company
review and approval of Energy Efficiency Measure costs may require additional
documentation from the Customer or Owner.
To qualify for Energy Efficiency Incentives. a maximum of 50% of the annual
kWh savings resulting from installation of EEMs specified in an Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application can result from lighting.
F or the purposes of calculating maximum annual electric savings resulting from
lighting. electric savings resulting from lighting interaction with mechanical
mPment and from lighting controls will be considered to be lighting savings.
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
Blah
R lJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued)
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued)
To qualify for Energy Efficiency Incentives. new Commercial Buildings and
Maior Renovation proiects required to comply with current Idaho energy codes
must reduce the proposed electric energy consumption by at least 10% when
compared to the baseline level of whole building electric energy consumption that
would have resulted under the current Idaho energy code.
The baseline and proposed building design shall be modeled using the
methodology defined in Addendum e (Informative Appendix G) to ASHRAE 90.
2001 (or successor versions) using values from the current Idaho energy codes.
Company shall maintain guidelines on the application of this methodology. The
date of the building permit application shall establish the current version of the
code.
The Customer or Owner may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive from
the Company per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:
ill
ill
Enerey Analysis
Company shall meet with Customer or Owner and any design team and
may perform an initial site visit/plans review to determine what EEMs
may be appropriate for an energy analysis.
Supplemental Services
Company may offer Supplemental Services beyond those described
elsewhere in this Tariff Schedule through a Supplemental Services
Agreement. Supplemental services shall include. but are not limited to:
detailed design. life cycle costs calculations or compliance documentation
for green or high performance building standards. Company will negotiate
the amount and terms of the supplemental services on a proiect specific
basis and may require any or all of the following: installation of EEMs
delivering a certain amount of annual kWh savings. offset of a portion of
the available incentive or direct reimbursement of a portion (up to 100%)
of the direct Company costs for the service provided.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulilh
nlJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued),
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
ill
ill
(4al
ill
EEM Inspection
Company will inspect any EEMs which are funded by or installed under
this program. Satisfactory inspection by Company will be required priorto receiving Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
EEM Commissionin2
Company will require that EEMs as specified in the Energy Efficiency
Incentive Agreement or approved Application be commissioned prior to
receiving Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy Efficiency
Incentive Agreement or approved Application.
Commissionin2 Opt-Out: Required EEM Commissioning may be
omitted with the following adiustments. Annual kWh savings. Average
Monthly On Peak kW savings and eligible EEM Costs will all be reduced
by 20% and an Energy Efficiency Incentive calculated using the provisions
specified under Incentives for EEMs. EEMs where the Owner or
Customer has "opted-out" of EEM Commissioning and are later
commissioned are not eligible for an additional Energy Efficiency
Incentive after the Energy Efficiency Incentive is paid.
Measure Performance Verification/Evaluation
Company may verify or evaluate the energy savings of installed Energy
Efficiency Measures specified in the Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application. This verification may include a
telephone survey. site visit. review of plant operation characteristics. and
pre- and post-installation of monitoring equipment as necessary to quantify
actual energy savings.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2 . 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
Blah
nlJUMI,.
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 125.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 125 (Continued),
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued),
(6)
(7)
Minimum Equipment Efficiency
For Retrofit Energy Efficiency Proiects. EEMs must meet mInImum
equipment efficiency levels and equipment eligibility requirements in
Schedule 115 to be eligible for incentives available under this Schedule.
For lighting. see Table 1 and notes 2. 6 and 7. For motors. see Table 2 and
note 2. For Mechanical EEMs. see Table 3 and notes 1-4 and 6.
Heat Pump Systems
Company will provide Energy Efficiency Incentives for energy efficiency
improvements to heat pump space heating systems only for Energy
Efficiency Proiects whose base case plans call for heat pump space heating
systems.
(8)Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be made available to induce fuel
switching by Owner or Customer.
Design team honorarium: Company may offer an honorarium as described
on the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company web site
to a design team member with current professional certification including
architects and engineers to encourage early initial Company consultation
on Owner/Customer s design and plans. Honorariums will be equally
available to all professionally certified architects and engineers for Idaho
proiects within Company s territory and will be limited to one honorarium
per proiect. Additional conditions for the honorarium will be available on
the Idaho energy efficiency program section of the Company s web site
and may be changed with 60 days notice posted on the web site.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this Schedule
subiect to the General Rules and Regulations contained in the tariff of which this
Schedule is a part. and to those prescribed by regulatory authorities.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulilh
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155
STATE OF IDAHO
Optional for Qualifying: Customers
PURPOSE: Service under this Schedule is intended to maximize the efficient utilization
of the electricity requirements of new and existing loads in agricultural irrigation systems and
irrigation district pumping systems by promoting electric energy-efficient irrigation practices and
the installation of Energy Efficiency Measures.
APPLICABLE: To service under the Company s Irrigation and Soil Drainage Pumping
Power Service Schedule 10. and to any customer who qualifies as a "Farm Load" under the
Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act.. P.L. 96-501 and receives
electric service on a retail schedule in all territory served by the Company in the State of Idaho.
DEFINITIONS:
Annual kWh Savines: The annual kilowatt-hour (kWh) savings resulting from
installation of the Energy Efficiency Measures or improved equipment operation.
as estimated by the Program Administrator or Company.
Averaee Monthlv On Peak kW Savines: The Average Monthly On Peak
kilowatt (kW) savings resulting from the installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures or improved equipment operation as estimated by Program
Administrator or Company using engineering analysis as described below:
Average Monthly On Peak kW Savings = (baseline average monthly On Peak kW
:...illQPosed average monthly On Peak kW). where;
Average Monthly On Peak kW = sum of the 12 Monthly Maximum On Peak
kW/12. where;
(Continuedl
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
Blah
nlJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICUL TURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Monthly Maximum On Peak kW = highest of all 15 minute average kW eM
determined below) for On Peak hours. On Peak hours are those hours
specified in the electric service schedule under which the customer receives
electric service.
15 minute average kW = sum of kWh used over 0.25 hrs/0.25 hrs
Baseline Adjustments: Program Administrator or Company may adiust baseline
electric energy consumption and costs during engineering analysis to reflect any of
the following: standard practice. changes in capacity. changes in production or
system use and equipment at the end of its useful life.
Customer: Any party who has applied for. been accepted and receives service at
the real illQI)erty. is the owner of the real property. or is the electricity user at the
real property.
Enerev Efficiencv Incentive: Payment of money made by Program
Administrator or Company to Customer for installation of Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to an executed Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application.
Enerey Efficiency Incentive Aereement: An agreement between Customer and
Program Administrator or Company providing for Program Administrator or
Company to furnish Energy Efficiency Incentive with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this tariff Schedule.
Enerev Efficiency Incentive Application: An application provided by the
Program Administrator or Company. completed by the Customer and approved by
the Program Administrator or Company requesting the Program Administrator or
Company furnish Energy Efficiency Incentives with respect to Energy Efficiency
Measures pursuant to this Schedule.
Ener~y Efficiency Measure (EEM): Permanently installed measure specified in
an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application which can improve the
efficiency of the Customer s electric energy use.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
ulah
nlJt1lr
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Ener~y Efficiency Project: One or more EEMW covered by one Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application.
Energy Efficiency Measure (EEM) Cost:
New Construction: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient
equipment or system minus the cost of the required/common practice equipment
or system.
Maior System Upgrades: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy
efficient equipment or system minus the cost of the required/common practice
equipment or system.
Retrofit: EEM Cost is the total installed cost of the energy efficient equipment or
modification.
In the case of New Construction. Maior System Upgrades and Retrofits. EEM
Costs shall mean the Customer s reasonable costs incurred (net of any discounts.
rebates or incentives other than Energy Efficiency Incentives available under this
Schedule or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Environmental
Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) incentives. or other consideration that reduces
the final actual EEM Cost incurred by the Customer) to purchase and install
EEMs at the Customer s facility. If the Customer installs the EEM. then the cost
of installation shall be equal to the Customer s reasonable and realistic actual
labor costs for such installation.
New Construction: New irrigation pIpIng. pumping. or system to provide
irrigation for existing irrigated acreage or loads.
Major System UID!rades: Changes. modifications or additions to existing
irrigation systems or eqillpment that involve substantial removal and replacement
with new systems or equipment where such changes. modifications or additions
are required to replace eqillpment at the end of its useful life. add capacity or
change the utilization of the acreage or loads.
~ram Administrator: Qualified person or entity hired by the Company to
administer this Schedule.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15. 2005
Blah01."
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
DEFINITIONS: (Continued)
Retrofit: Changes. modifications or additions to systems or equipment serving
existing acreage or loads.
INCENTIVES FOR EEMS:
Nozzle exchange: Program Administrator or Company shall establish procedures
and requirements for a nozzle exchange program allowing Customer to
exchange existing nozzles. gasket and drains for appropriately sized new and like
equipment. Nozzle exchange procedures. and requirements will be posted on the
Company web site. Equipment installed on pivot systems will not be eligible for
Energy Efficiency Incentives under the Nozzle exchange portion of this Schedule.
but will be eligible for amounts listed in Table l or. if not listed. based on the
Energy Efficiency Incentives energy. demand and cost formula below.
Enerey Efficiency Incentives: Program Administrator or Company shall
establish procedures and requirements for providing Energy Efficiency Incentives
to Customers which shall be posted on the Company web site. Energy Efficiency
Incentives include amounts listed in Table 1 and amounts available according to
the energy. demand and cost formula listed below. All proposed Energy
Efficiency Proiects are subiect to Program Administrator or Company approval
prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application.
Program Administrator or Company will establish Energy Efficiency Proiect
approval criteria and post the criteria on the Company web site.
For all EEMs not eligible under the Nozzle exchange or listed in Table 1. Energy
Efficiency Incentives made available for installation of EEMs pursuant to an
Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or Application shall be shall be the lesser
of the sum of W and (Q) OR (ft
(a) $0.12 /kWh for the Annual kWh savings as determined using Program
Administrator or Company provided or approved engineering analysis;
$50/kW for Average Monthly On Peak kW savings determined using
Program Administrator or Company provided or approved engineering
analysis.
50% of the EEM Cost as determined by the Program Administrator or
Company.
(b)
(c)
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
Blah
RIJlM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICULTURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
IN CENTIVES FOR EEMS: (Continued)
Energy Efficiency Incentives may be adiusted such that Customer does not receive
more than 100% of EEM Costs in total incentives including incentives available
under this Schedule and EQIP incentives.
All proposed EEM Costs are subiect to Program Administrator or Company
review and approval prior to offering an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement
or approving an Application. All final EEM Costs are subiect to Program
Administrator or Company review and approval prior to paying an Energy
Efficiency Incentive per the terms of an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approved Application. Program Administrator or Company review and approval
ofEEM Costs may require additional documentation from the Customer.
The Customer may receive only one Energy Efficiency Incentive under this
Schedule per EEM.
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE:
(1)Enerey Analysis
Program Administrator or Company shall meet with Customer and any
design team and may perform an initial site visit/plans review to determine
what EEMs may be appropriate for an energy analysis. The energy
analysis may include a visual pump check. water management
consultation. pump testing. and/or irrigation/pump system analysis.
At the conclusion of the visual pump check and water management
consultation. the Customer may be asked to sign an approval to proceed to
the next step in the program and to commit to implement operational
improvements identified in the water management consultation. If
Customer signs the approval. Customer will receive an irrigation/pump
system analysis. an incentive offer if potential upgrades are identified. and
post-installation testing of installed system.
(Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
BlahnlBilr
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICUL TURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued)
PROVISIONS OF SERVICE: (Continued)
ill
ill
ill
EEM Inspection
Program Administrator or Company may inspect any EEMs which are
funded by or installed under this program. Satisfactory inspection by
Program Administrator or Company will be required prior to receiving
Energy Efficiency Incentives specified in the Energy Efficiency Incentive
Agreement or approved Application.
Measure Performance Verification/Evaluation
Program Administrator and/or Company may verify or evaluate the energy
savings of installed Energy Efficiency Measures specified in the Energy
Efficiency Incentive Agreement or approved Application. nozzles or
equipment received as part of the Nozzle Exchange. and/or improved
equipment operation. This verification may include a telephone survey.
site visit. review of system operating characteristics. and pre- and post-
installation of monitoring equipment as necessary to quantify actual energy
savIngs.
Energy Efficiency Incentives will not be made available to induce fuel
switching by Customer.
ELECTRIC SERVICE REGULATIONS: Service under this Schedule is subiect to
the General Rules and Regulations contained in the tariff of which this Schedule is a part. and to
those prescribed by regulatory authorities.
,(
Continued)
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
Blah
RIJUM
C. No. 28 Original Sheet No. 155.
AGRICUL TURAL ENERGY SERVICES SCHEDULE NO. 155 (Continued),
Table 1. Pivot EQuipment Enere:v Efficiencv Measures
Category Replace With Customer
incentive
Pivot Span Low Existing pivot low pressure New low pressure drain replacement parts or $4/each
Pressure Drains drains entire drain assemblies
Sprinkler Pressure Existing sprinkler pressure New sprinkler pressure regulators with the $6/each
Re !!Ula tors reQUlators same or lower outlet desilm Dressure
Sprinkler Package Existing sprinkler package New sprinkler package with a design flow c:::$900 per
with design flow
::;..
m/acre center pivot
gum/acre
Dual Sprinkler Existing sprinkler package Dual sprinkler head assemblies and a second $500 per
Packages with design flow ::;.. 7.sprinkler package with a design flow c::: 5.center pivot
gum/acre.QDm/acre
Notes for Table 1:
1). All sprinklers on a center pivot must be replaceq to qualify for incentives. 2). Minimum 80
maximum 170 heads per center pivot. 3). prop tubes and new pressure regulators are consiqered part of
new sprinkler package and are not eligible for individual incentives.
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2. 2005 EFFECTIVE: November 15.2005
ulahnlJlII
C. No. 28 Ori inal Sheet No. 191
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
ELECTRIC SERVICE SCHEDULE NO. 191
STATE OF IDAHO
CUSTOMER EFFI CIEN CY SERVICES ADJUSTMENT
PURPOSE: The Customer Efficiency Services Adiustment is designed to recover the costs
incurred by the Company associated with Commission-approved demand-side management expenditures.
APPLICATION: This Schedule shall be applicable to all retail tariff Customers taking service
under the Company s electric service schedules.
MONTHL Y BILL: In addition to the Monthly Charges contained in the Customer s applicable
schedule. all monthly bills shall have the following percentage increases applied prior to the application of
electric service Schedule 34.
Schedule 1
Schedule 6
Schedule 6A
Schedule 7
Schedule 7 A
Schedule 8
Schedule 9
Schedule 10
Schedule 11
Schedule 12 - Street Lighting
Schedule 12 - Traffic Signal
Schedule 19
Schedule 23
Schedule 23A
Schedule 35
Schedule 35A
Schedule 36
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50 %
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
50%
Submitted Under Order No.
ISSUED: September 2.2005 EFFECTIVE: January 1.2006
ATTACHMENT 3
(Customer Rule 102 implementation information, including the bill message and the press release.
IDR~elnserurngO5sm B/3 1 : 48 PM Page
H P
Notice of Proposed Energy Efficiency
Programs and Price Change
Utah Power has filed for approval of several new and
enhanced energy efficiency programs. The Company
is also requesting approval of a new Demand Side
Management (DSM) cost recovery mechanism to pay
for these programs. The filing proposes an overall
annual revenue increase of $1.8 million, or 1.5 percent
of retail revenue. *
The Company filed the application with the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) on September 2
2005. The application is a proposal, subject to public
review and a Commission decision before it can take
effect.
If approved, the proposed DSM cost recovery
mechanism will start on January I, 2006. Program
costs will be collected by Utah Power as a line item
entitled "Customer Efficiency Services" on bills
instead of including the costs as part of general rates.
If the Company proposal is approved as filed, the
residential price increase will be 1.5 percent. For a
residential customer using 790 kilowatt-hours, the
proposed increase would be about $1.00 per month.
Revenue collected from commercial, industrial and
irrigation customers would also increase 1.5 percent.
These percent changes do not include the effect of the
BPA energy discount.
(continued on back)
. UTAH POWER
11111111
-+-
~aCk platE
IDRatelnsertAugOSsm ~'48 PM Page
H P
The new and enhanced energy efficiency
programs will offer information, services and cash
incentives to help customers install energy efficient
equipment or make permanent operational changes
to reduce energy consumption and save money. New
programs will be available on November 15, 2005 or
when the Commission approves the application
whichever is later.
Copies of the filing will be available online at
www.utahpower.net, click on "News" and then select
Rates and Regulation" and "Idaho . Or, you can
review a copy during regular business hours at the
IPUC office in Boise, and in these Utah Power offices:
25 East Main, Rexburg
509 South 200 East, Preston
852 East 1400 North, Shelley
24852 U.S. Highway 89, Montpelier
Based on rates in effect after September 2005.
8/05 . UTAH POWER
_11__11
lCk
platE
UTAH POWER
Contact: Margaret Oler, 801-220-2592
SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE
September 6, 2005
Utah Power proposes energy efficiency programs
BOISE, Idaho - Utah Power has filed for approval of several new and enhanced energy
efficiency and demand-side management (DSM) programs for customers and a cost
recovery mechanism to pay for these programs. The filing proposes an overall annual
revenue increase of $1.8 million, or 1.5 percent of retail revenue, based on rates in effect
after Sept. 16, 2005.
The Utah Power proposal, if approved by the Idaho Public Utilities Commission
(IPUC), would allow the company to offer customers new and enhanced energy
efficiency programs. According to Bob Lively, Utah Power regulatory manager, the
programs will offer information, services and cash incentives to customers to help install
energy efficient equipment or make permanent operational changes to reduce energy
consumption and save money. The new programs will be available Nov. 15 2005, or
when the Commission approves the application, whichever is later.
If approved, the proposed DSM cost recovery mechanism will start on Jan. 1
2006. Program costs will be collected by Utah Power as a line item noted as "Customer
Efficiency Services" on bills rather than including the costs as part of general rates.
If the Company s proposal is approved as filed, the residential price increase will
be 1.5 percent " Lively said. "For a residential customer using 790 kilowatt hours
monthly, the proposed increase would be about $1.00 per month.
If approved, commercial, industrial and irrigation customers would also see an
increase of 1.5 percent and that these percent changes do not include the effect of the
BP A energy discount.
Utah Power s proposal is subject to public review and approval by the IPUC.
Copies of the filing will be available online at www.utahpower.net, click on "News" and
then select "Rates and Regulation" and "Idaho." The filing is also available to be
reviewed during regular business hours at the IPUC office in Boise and the Utah Power
offices in Rexburg, Preston, Shelley and Montpelier.
30-
ATTACHMENT 4
(Program descriptions, evaluation plans and cost effective analyses for the FinAnswer Express, Energy
FinAnswer, Irrigation Efficiency, Refrigerator Recycling and Low Income Weatherization programs.
FinAnswer Express
Program Description
The FinAnswer Express (FE) incentive program proposed for Idaho will be available to
commercial and industrial customers on the majority of Idaho rate schedules. It is a
successful existing energy efficiency incentive program for business customers in other
markets served by PacifiCorp and is designed to provide a prescriptive approach for
energy efficiency projects similar to the existing Schedule 122 which provides loans
instead of incentives. While a successful program design, the loan based offering has
limitations for many business customers. To increase participation, program
performance as well as capture lost opportunities, the Company is proposing to replace
the existing prescriptive energy efficiency program by offering the incentive based
FinAnswer Express program. At the same time new service under the existing
Schedule 122 will be restricted. Since comprehensive projects are directed to the
enhanced Energy FinAnswer program, the major renovation clause from Schedule 122
or a comparable (e., maximum % of lighting) was not added to the FinAnswer
Express program.
The FE program is designed to complement the Energy FinAnswer program and
operate as part of a suite of energy efficiency programs. FE is designed to help
customers considering new or replacement lighting, motor, and HV AC (heating,
ventilating and air conditioning) equipment to purchase and install high efficiency
equipment. In the case of lighting retrofits, many FE projects are the result of pro-
active efforts to encourage customers to replace existing lighting with more efficient
lighting.
As part of introducing the program to the Idaho market, EEM categories were analyzed
and updated to reflect changes in technology, efficiency standards, and market
practices. Company obtained feedback from key market actors (trade allies), including
installation contractors, suppliers, and distributors over the last few months to confirm
the categories were in tune with the market. Equipment efficiency standards and
incentive levels for similar programs were reviewed. Incentive levels were analyzed to
confirm they are appropriate for the Idaho market. Based on this analysis, the
Company is proposing to add a prescriptive incentive for variable frequency drives
installed on HV AC system fans to the Idaho program. The rest of the proposed
program matches the Utah FinAnswer Express program, making it simpler for
customers and trade allies operating in both states.
Incentives and Equipment Eligibility Requirements
The FE program provides prescriptive incentives for common energy efficiency
measures (EEMs) with minimal transaction complexity. EEM categories include
efficient lighting, premium efficiency i.:..otors and mechanical upgrades associated with
FinAnswer Express Program Description 91112005
Page 1
heating and cooling. The program also includes LED traffic lights, and technical
expertise is available as part of the program. Motors meeting or exceeding the motor
industry s NEMA Premium efficiency levels are eligible for incentives. The NEMA
Premium standard is currently used by most other motors energy efficiency motors.
Unitary HV AC units meeting or exceeding Consortium for Energy Efficiency Tier 2
efficiency levels, expressed in SEER, are eligible for incentives. The HV AC category
includes incentives for evaporative cooling systems. The lighting category includes a
premium T8 category as well as standard T8s with electronic ballasts and a number of
other typical lighting energy efficiency measures.
Both new construction and retrofit projects are eligible. Incentives for new construction
are based on equipment that exceeds code requirements, so some equipment eligible
for incentives in retrofit projects is not eligible for incentives for new construction.
addition, there is a custom incentive calculation for measures not listed on the
prescriptive incentive tables.
Participation Process and Quality Assurance
The proposed participation process and incentive delivery varies for each of the three
technologies and is based on prior experience as well as characterization of the Idaho
market. It is streamlined and designed to fit into the normal equipment sales process in
the market and supports existing market actors.
For lighting, the customer signs an incentive agreement or submits an application prior
to purchasing equipment. Project specific energy savings calculations, performed by
either a trade ally or a representative of Company, are included in the incentive
agreement or application. The incentive agreement or application includes an optional
provision for the customer to assign their incentive to a third party such as a contractor
or supplier. After the incentive agreement is signed or the application is approved, the
customer contracts for project installation. After the project installation is complete
the Company inspects the project and reviews the project invoices. A final incentive is
calculated and an incentive check is mailed by the Company to the customer within 45
days.
Incentives for premium efficiency motors are available to the customer from
participating motor vendors at the "point of purchase . The incentive is available to the
customer as a credit on the motor dealer invoice. Motor vendors must participate in the
Company s trade ally network to offer customer incentives in this manner.
Participation includes signing a trade ally agreement covering incentive processing,
customer services, etc. On a regular basis, after incentives have been paid and the
required paperwork has been submitted and approved, Company provides
reimbursement to the dealers. Company arranges to inspect a representative sample of
the motor installations for quality assurance purposes.
Incentives for efficient HV AC equipment are provided through a post purchase
application. The customer purchases qnalifying equipment from their dealer, completes
the equipment installation, and submits an application and cost documentation.
FinAnswer Express Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 2
Customers receive an incentive within 45 days of submitting a completed application
for qualifying equipment. Company arranges for inspections of a sample of HV
equipment for quality assurance purposes.
Incentives for equipment not specifically listed in the prescriptive incentive tables are
available through the "apply before you start" incentive agreement or application
process described in the lighting section above. In the event a customer does not want
to receive a "point of purchase" motor incentive or "post purchase" HV AC incentive
they may request an "apply before your start" agreement or application described
above. To adjust to market changes, the Company has included language in the FE
tariff that permits changing the incentive delivery mechanism by technology or project
type (i., retrofit or new construction) with 60 days notice on our web site. Any
changes in incentive levels or equipment eligibility will still require a tariff change.
Program Delivery
Similar to other markets, the Company intends to seek proposals for technology
specific trade ally coordinator(s) for lighting, motors and HV AC equipment. The
coordinator(s) will be tasked with qualifying interested trade allies, support trade ally
driven project development, process incentive agreements and/or applications and
perform installation quality assurance inspections. A primary goal of the FE program
proposed for Idaho is sustainable trade ally participation in all phases of energy
efficient equipment sales and installation.
While the Company expects to provide the bulk of the services through Idaho trade ally
networks, the proposed FE program contains provisions for Company paid energy
analyst to deliver energy savings calculations to customers upon request. Similar to the
Energy FinAnswer program, no financial obligations for the customer occur when they
participate in project analysis, either through a trade ally supported by Company or
through an energy analyst.
Marketing
Expected program participants include both large and small commercial and industrial
customers. The program will be marketed primarily via trade allies as they respond to
inquiries or are making sales calls regarding new and replacement equipment.
addition, account managers and program staff will market the program to customers to
encourage them to contact their vendors and to request high efficiency equipment.
addition, the Company will prepare a marketing and communications plan that may
include advertising as appropriate in the Idaho market.
The Company will update its web site for energy efficiency programs with information
on the new Idaho program offering. The existing suite of promotional program
materials will be customized for the Idaho program.
FinAnswer Express Program Description 9/112005
Page 3
Projected Results
Based on the market characterization performed by Nexant (attached as a supplemental
filing document), results from November 2005 through December 2006 are projected
to be approximately 434 MWH and .06 MW of peak capacity reduction. After the
second full year, the program results are estimated at 605 MWH and .09 MW. Results
for the third full year and beyond are estimated at 605 MWH and .09 MW.
FinAnswer Express Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 4
FinAnswer Express
Evaluation Plan
This is a general evaluation plan for the Idaho FinAnswer Express program and
describes general approaches. An exact scope of work will be determined each year.
The program will be on-going and this evaluation plan assumes an annual impact
evaluation and process evaluations as required. If participation is low in the first year
Company may analyze the possibility of moving the impact evaluation to the send of
the second year to allow for a statistically significant sample size. After the program is
ramped up impact evaluations undertaken annually. The need for a process evaluation
will depend on the results from the on-going program quality assurance activities. All
FinAnswer Express program evaluations will be performed by a third party evaluator
selected and retained by the company for this specific task.
Overview
The goals of the evaluation(s) are to:
1. Estimate actual energy (kWh) and demand (kW) savings
2. Analyze Program cost effectiveness
3. Assess Program delivery
Impact Evaluation
The impact evaluation will include collecting key data, selecting a statistically valid
sample of participants, estimating energy savings, and assessing cost effectiveness. The
impact evaluation approach will vary by type of measure installed and will include one
or more of the following; simulation modeling, engineering calculations or billing
analysis.
Measure Verification
PacifiCorp has a comprehensive quality assurance process in place for this program
that is tied to the incentive delivery mechanism.
For lighting or any "agreement or application before purchase" project:
Project manager or trade ally coordinator review and approval of energy efficiency
measures prior to participant implementation.
Idaho FinAnswer Express program evaluation plan 9/1/2005
Page 1
Project manager or trade ally coordinator review and approval of energy efficiency
measures inspections.
For post purchase incentive applications:
Providing lists of eligible equipment efficiency levels to all market actors and
customers.
Providing easy access to concise incentive forms and references to equipment
efficiency levels.
Project manager or trade ally coordinator review and approval of post purchase
incentive applications prior to payment of the incentive.
Site inspections of a sample of installed equipment covered by the incentive
applications.
For point of purchase incentive delivery:
Screening and qualifying equipment dealers who may offer the incentives and
requiring a signed trade ally participation agreement.
Providing lists of eligible equipment efficiency levels to dealers and customers.
Trade ally coordinator review and approval of post purchase incentive applications
prior to payment of the incentive.
Site inspections of a sample of installed equipment covered by the incentive
applications.
The evaluator will review the quality assurance process to assure that each of these
steps has been fully implemented. In addition, the evaluator will independently review
a sample of the inspection reports.
Establishment of Baseline Operating Practices
and Efficiency Levels
Energy codes, standard practices and the need for improved equipment all influence
project baselines. The tariff contains language permitting the company to adjust
engineering analyses to reflect these influences. Determination of what would have
happened in the absence of the effort is key in assessing the effects of an efficiency
program. Through review of project file data, the evaluator will characterize the
baseline operating practices and efficiency levels and the prevailing standard practice
of facility or equipment operation.
Specifically, the evaluator will characterize:
Estimated existing and improved equipment and resulting efficiency levels.
Idaho FinAnswer Express program evaluation plan 9/1/2005
Page 2
Estimated equipment and resulting efficiency levels in the absence of this program.
Site visits will be conducted to determine whether:
Original assumptions used in the energy analysis report were reasonable
Anal ysis methods are appropriate
Measures were installed as planned
Measures operated as planned
Inspections confirmed efficiency levels and variables affecting energy savings.
Any fundamental differences will be identified and revised savings analysis will be
provided.
Savings Analysis
Evaluated energy and demand savings will be estimated using one or more of the
following methods:
Engineering calculations
Billing or metering data analysis
Conduct Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The evaluator will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis using traditional cost-
effectiveness analysis methods. The analysis will include the standard perspectives
(i., utility, ratepayers, participants, and society). The benefits to PacifiCorp include
the reduction in energy consumption and the Company s avoided costs. For
participants, benefits include reduction in energy costs.
Process Eval uation
In order to inform the Company about issues or opportunities regarding the delivery
and administration of the Program a process evaluation will be conducted as necessary
and determined by the company program manager. The process evaluation may
include interviews with utility staff, and/or program participants and non-participants.
Survey Utility Staff
The evaluator will interview utility staff regarding:
Customer participation process
Customer eligibility criteria and the verification process
Idaho FinAnswer Express program evaluation plan 9/112005
Page 3
Marketing
Vendor relations
Program data collection
Utility and implementer coordination
Participant Survey Design and Implementation
After reviewing the project files, the evaluator will complete telephone surveys with
Program participants. The aim of the survey will be to determine:
How each participant learned about the program
Their assessment of the value of the FinAnswer Express program services
Impact of the FinAnswer Express program services on their operation and
maintenance practices
Satisfaction with their participation in the program
Whether they implemented any additional energy efficiency measures and whether
the program influenced them to do so.
Develop Findings and Recommendations
The evaluator will analyze the collected data and opinions to assess Program strengths
weaknesses, bottlenecks , areas for improvement, and best practices.
Management & Reporti
The evaluator will deliver a draft and final report of findings. The final report will
reflect all the comments made by stakeholders. It will provide a complete description
of the relevant evaluation objectives and how they were achieved. The final report is to
contain the following elements:
Executive Summary
Description of the program, its goals, and objectives
Statement of the evaluation goals and objectives
Discussion of methodologies
Implementation procedures and assumptions for each method
Data-collection procedures and methods
Sample design and sample attrition
Results and their interpretation (demonstrated clearly with charts and tables)
Idaho FinAnswer Express program evaluation plan 9/1/2005
Page 4
Energy FinAnswer
Program Description
The Energy FinAnswer program has been operational in Idaho for approximately
fifteen years. The current program, covered mainly by Schedule 120, provides program
funded energy engineering and a loan offer to business and institutional customers
considering energy efficiency upgrades. While a successful program design, the loan
based offering has limitations for many business customers. To increase participation
and program performance as well as capture lost opportunities, Utah Power (the
Company) is proposing to enhance the current program in addition to introducing the
FinAnswer Express program. The focus of Energy FinAnswer remains comprehensive
retrofit and new construction projects where project schedule and/or measure
complexity favor project specific engineering calculations. The enhanced Energy
FinAnswer program will operate as a complement to the FinAnswer Express program.
Both will operate together as a suite of energy efficiency programs for business
customers.
Similar to Energy FinAnswer program enhancements in other markets, (UT and W A),
the Company is proposing to continue the Company funded engineering, discontinue
the loan offering, add an incentive offer and make various administrative enhancements
to support those changes. The Company proposes to make these changes by
Filing a new tariff for the enhanced Energy FinAnswer, Schedule 125, and
Revising Schedule 120 to prohibit new service and leave the tariffs in place to
address the few remaining loan obligations.
The enhanced Energy FinAnswer program includes engineering services, cash
incentives, commissioning support, and post-installation verification services. Each is
described in more detail below.
Engineering Services
Based on prior program experience design and the comprehensive nature of the typical
Energy FinAnswer project, program funded energy engineering services will continue
to be available through this program to:
Assist with defining cost-effective electric energy savings opportunities through an
initial site visit.
Energy FinAnswer Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 1
Develop the customer selected opportunities into a more detailed energy analysis
with further refinement of energy savings and implementation costs.
Provide due-diligence reviews of the savings estimates
Inspect the installed systems
The program funded engineering services will be expanded to provide commissioning
plans to the customer for measures requiring commissioning as described below.
The engineering service offering has also been enhanced to include a provision for
supplemental services in cases where customers require more information to make an
implementation decision. Examples include life cycle cost modeling, sustainable
building requirements modeling or detailed design. To help insure the program offers
these services only where required, this provision allows the customer and the
Company to enter in a specific agreement for project specific supplemental services.
These agreements may include a re-pay obligation unless the customer proceeds with a
project.
Incentives
The proposed Energy FinAnswer program for Idaho will contain the same standard
offer type incentive formula used successfully in the UT and W A markets. The
incentive formula is:
$0. 12/kWh per first year annual energy savings + $50 per average on-peak kW
reduction; up to 50% of the measure cost.
This incentive rate will be offered for all energy efficiency measures installed. A one-
time payment will be made after proper installation of the project and based on the
approved post-installation savings calculations. Incentives will not be available to
reduce the project (one or more energy efficient measures) simple payback below one
year for any qualifying project in the Energy FinAnswer program.
Commissioning
A commissioning requirement is part of the program enhancement and is designed to
help ensure proper operation and compliance with the project's design intent before the
full incentive payment is made. The program funds the development of the
commissioning plan, and the owner or owner s contractor is required to fund the
commissioning work. The project is required to be commissioned - typically by
demonstrating the system is operating as intended at least 30 days prior to the final
inspection. Commissioning is not required for some equipment upgrades.
To help focus the commissioning infrastru ~ture on larger projects, and to accommodate
tight construction schedules, a commissioning "opt out" provision will be added to the
Energy FinAnswer Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 2
program. Commissioning "opt out" will entail discounting both measure costs and
savings by 20% and calculating the "opt out" incentive with the same $0. 12/kWh and
$50/kW. Measures where the owner has opted out are not eligible to be commissioned
at later date for an additional incentive.
Marketing
Expected program participants include large customers, contractors, and energy
services companies. Similar to marketing under the prior Energy FinAnswer program
the enhanced program will be marketed to these participants by Utah Power program
staff, account managers, and through trade ally contacts. Project leads will be generated
through contacts with owner organizations, contractor associations, individual trade
allies, and previous participants.
A new marketing approach in the enhanced program is the design team honorarium. It
is designed to promote early program involvement in new construction projects. The
intended recipients are members of new construction design teams with plans prior to
completion of the schematic phase, a fee agreement for design who can deliver a
signed project LOI (see participation steps below). The honorarium will initially be set
at $1 500 and can be adjusted with 60 days notice on the Company web site
The Utah Power web site for energy efficiency programs will be updated with
information on the new Idaho program offering. The existing suite of promotional
program materials will be updated.
Eligibility Requirements
The program is available for both new construction and retrofits of existing
commercial and industrial facilities receiving electric service on an eligible rate
schedule. The minimum facility size for commercial building retrofits is 20 000 square
feet (based on the area served by the electric meter). The program will target non-
lighting measures, comprehensive electricity saving retrofits, and new construction
projects. To encourage comprehensive projects, similar to the intent of the major
renovation requirement in the current Schedule 120, a maximum of 50% of the project
savings can come from lighting measures. The Company s experience in other markets
is that a lighting requirement is more effective than a major renovation requirement in
encouraging both participation and comprehensive projects. Interactive savings and
lighting control measures may qualify for an incentive but are considered lighting
savings and count toward the 50% maximum lighting savings requirement. Lighting
projects will be referred to the FinAnswer Express as will fast moving single measure
projects like package HV AC equipment.
Energy FinAnswer Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 3
Utah Power s goal is to provide incentives for projects that exceed the commonly used
energy efficiency standards such as local energy codes, EP ACT, ASHRAE Standard
90., NEMA, CEE and "common practice." For new commercial buildings and major
renovation projects required to comply with energy code, projects must exceed energy
code by at least 10 percent on a whole building electric energy basis to qualify for
incentives.
In addition, a project's baseline energy consumption and installation cost will be
adjusted per the following guidelines:
...
Energy-saving tube and magnetic energy-efficient ballast combination will be used
for linear fluorescent lighting retrofits unless the existing fixtures are more efficient
that this "34 watt" linear fluorescent baseline.
...
Code minimum efficiencies will be used for air conditioning equipment and
motors.
...
The baseline for failed equipment replacements or equipment required to change
the use of a facility or expand a system will be code compliant or common practice.
...
For retrofits, energy efficiency measures must meet minimum eligibility
requirements specified in the Idaho FinAnswer Express program.
Existing equipment energy consumption will be used for all other projects.
Participation Process
The major steps associated with participating in the Energy FinAnswer program are:
... A Utah Power customer submits a signed Letter of Intent (LOI).
...
Utah Power hires an energy-engineering consultant with the experience required for
the specific customer project. A project scoping meeting/walk through is
conducted to evaluate potential measures and opportunities. The project is broadly
defined through this process. These results are provided to the customer to agree
upon a final project scope.
...
Based on the agreed upon scope of work, Utah Power contracts with the energy
engineer to provided a detailed energy analysis, including documentation of
baseline conditions, costs, and energy savings of the potential measures. The
engineering document is reviewed by another energy engineering professional and
presented to the customer along with a preliminary Utah Power incentive offer. The
energy analysis report also includes commissioning requirements to be used by the
customer or customer s contractor to meet Utah Power s commissioning
requirement.
...
The participant and Utah Power sign an Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement or
approve a submitted Applit;ation and the participant procures equipment and
Energy FinAnswer Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 4
services installs the project, completes project commissioning, and submits
invoices and other project cost documentation.
Participants may elect the commissioning "opt out" provision of the program.
Both measure costs and savings will be discounted by 20% and the adjusted
figures used to calculate the "opt out" incentive with the same $0. 12/kWh and
$50/kW. Measures where the owner has opted out are not eligible to be
commissioned at a later date for an additional incentive.
...
Utah Power will inspect each site upon completion of project installation and
commissioning. The inspection report documents the installed energy efficiency
measures, the savings, and the final costs. A final incentive will be calculated
based on final energy savings and costs. The incentive payment is made within 45
days of inspection.
Miscellaneous Changes
Language has been added to restrict incentives for heat pumps to projects with heat
pumps in their base case plans to prevent any appearances of load building. Other
language has been added to prevent the use of incentives for fuel switching. Both these
provisions are included in the program in other markets.
Projected Program Results
The annual energy savings are adjusted by a.8 net-to-gross ratio from the California
Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER) data base. This adjustment is used to be
conservative and will be replaced by Idaho specific impact evaluation results when
available. Net savings projections for the first year (November 2005 through December
2006) are 1 840 MWH and .16 MW of peak capacity reduction. Increases in
participation are forecast to increase this to 5 519 MWh and .49 MW in the second
year. In the third year, the program is projected to reach a steady state and deliver
approximately 6 920 Mwh of annual energy savings and .62 MW of peak capacity
reduction.
Energy FinAnswer Program Description 91112005
Page 5
Energy FinAnswer
Evaluation Plan
This is a general evaluation plan for the Idaho Energy FinAnswer program and
describes general approaches. An exact scope of work will be determined each year.
The program will be on-going and this evaluation plan assumes an annual impact
evaluation and process evaluations as required, depending on program activity. If
participation is low in the first year, Company may analyze the possibility of moving
the impact evaluation to the end of the second year to allow for a statistically
significant sample size. After the program is ramped up, impact evaluations will be
undertaken annually. The need for a process evaluation will also depend on the results
from the on-going program quality assurance activities. All FinAnswer program
evaluations will be performed by a third party evaluator selected and retained by the
company for this specific task.
Overview
The goals of the evaluations are to:
1. Estimate actual energy (kWh) and demand (kW) savings
2. Analyze Program cost effectiveness
3. Assess Program delivery
Impact Evaluation
The impact evaluation will include collecting key data, selecting a statistically valid
sample of participants , performing on-site evaluations of the project, estimating energy
savings including modeling of projects where appropriate, and assessing cost
effectiveness. The impact evaluation approach will vary by type of measure installed
and will include or more of the following; simulation modeling, engineering
calculations or billing analysis.
Measure Verification
PacifiCorp has a comprehensive quality assurance process in place for this Program
consisting of:
Project manager review and approval of energy efficiency measures prior to
participant implementation.
Idaho Energy PinAnswer Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 1
Project manager review and approval of energy efficiency measures
commissioning and inspection.
The evaluator will review the quality assurance process to assure that each of these
steps has been fully implemented. In addition, the evaluator will independent! y review
a sample of the commissioning and inspection reports. Based on this review the
evaluator will assess the level of on-site verification required.
Establishment of Baseline Operating Practices
and Efficiency Levels
Energy codes, standard practices and the need for improved equipment all influence
project baselines. The tariff contains language permitting the company to adjust
engineering analyses to reflect these influences. Determination of what would have
happened in the absence of the effort is key in assessing the effects of an efficiency
program. Through review of project file data, the evaluator will characterize the
baseline operating practices and efficiency levels and the prevailing standard practice
of facility or equipment operation.
Specifically, the evaluator will characterize:
Estimated existing and improved equipment and equipment operation
practices and resulting efficiency levels.
Estimated equipment and equipment operation practices and resulting
efficiency levels in the absence of this Program.
Site visits will be conducted to determine whether:
Original assumptions used in the energy analysis report were reasonable
Analysis methods are appropriate
Measures were installed as planned
Measures operated as planned
Commissioning was appropriate and conducted properly.
Any fundamental differences will be identified and revised savings analysis will be
provided.
Savings Analysis
Evaluated energy and demand savings will be estimated using one or more of the
following methods:
Building simulation modeling
Idaho Energy FinAnswer Program Evaluation Plan 9/112005
Page 2
Engineering calculations
Billing or metering data analysis
Conduct Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The evaluator will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis using traditional cost-
effectiveness analysis methods. The analysis will include the standard perspectives
(i., utility, ratepayers, participants, and society). The benefits to PacifiCorp include
the reduction in energy consumption and the Company s avoided costs. For
participants, benefits include reduction in energy costs.
Process Eval uation
In order to inform the Company about issues or opportunities regarding the
delivery and administration of the Program a process evaluation will be
conducted as necessary and determined by company program manager. The
process evaluation will include interviews with utility staff, and participants.
Survey Utility Staff
The evaluator will interview utility staff regarding:
Customer participation process
Customer eligibility criteria and the verification process
Marketing
Vendor relations
Program data collection
Utility and implementer coordination
Participant Survey Design and Implementation
After reviewing the project files, the evaluator will complete telephone surveys with
Program participants. The aim of the survey will be to determine:
How each participant learned about the Program
Their assessment of the value of the FinAnswer Program services
Impact of the FinAnswer Program services on their operation and
maintenance practices
Satisfaction with the PacifiCorp hired energy consultant
Satisfaction with their participation in the Program
Idaho Energy FinAnswer Program Evaluation Plan 9/112005
Page 3
Whether they implemented any additional energy efficiency measures and
whether the Program influenced them to do so.
Develop Findings and Recommendations
The evaluator will analyze the collected data and opinions to assess Program strengths
weaknesses, bottlenecks, areas for improvement, and best practices.
Management & Reporti
The evaluator will deliver a draft and final report of findings. The final report will
reflect all the comments made by stakeholders. It will provide a complete description
of the relevant evaluation objectives and how they were achieved. The final report is to
contain the following elements:
Executive Summary
Description of the Program, its goals, and objectives
Statement of the evaluation goals and objectives
Discussion of methodologies
Implementation procedures and assumptions for each method
Data-collection procedures and methods
Sample design and sample attrition
Results and their interpretation (demonstrated clearly with charts and tables)
Idaho Energy FinAnswer Program Evaluation Plan 9/112005
Page 4
Irrigation Efficiency
Program Description
Utah Power (the Company) is proposing to offer their Idaho irrigation customers on
Schedule 10 a comprehensive irrigation energy efficiency program. The proposed
program will be offered in addition to an incentive based Energy
FinAnswer/FinAnswer Express suite of programs in Idaho and the current Idaho load
control program offered through Schedule 72. Irrigation customers will receive energy
efficiency services exclusively through this program. This allows the Company to
target services and contract for program delivery in the most cost effective manner. The
Company plans to deliver these program services through a third party program
administrator and so released an RFP on February 14 for final program design and
delivery. Responses to the RFP were received March 28 2005 and a local agricultural
services organization is the likely candidate to deliver these services as Program
Administrator.
While services to irrigation customers will be delivered exclusively through this
program, it is the Company s intent to align the incentive structure and levels with the
enhanced Energy FinAnswer program being proposed.
Proposed Program Design
PacifiCorp has reviewed other irrigation program designs in the process to best select a
design with a "best fit" for Idaho customers that maintains cost effectiveness. Part of
this process involved categorizing source of savings for irrigation systems into the
following areas:
Instant savings - low cost equipment measures
Education - operational changes that tailor water use and system operation to
the best available weather and crop conditions.
Pump tests/repairs and replacement & system modifications
Review of other irrigation programs indicate high customer requests for low or no costs
services like pump tests and a low implementation rate for recommended changes. This
combination adversely impacts cost effectiveness of a "pump test only" based
irrigation energy efficiency program.
To ~cquire cost effective electric energy savings, the Comr~ny asked for proposals to
deliver a program with the following components:
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 9/112005
Page 1
Nozzle Exchange
Pump Screening & water management consultation
Pump testing, pump repair/replacement and system modifications
This proposed program design appears to be comparable with other market offerings to
irrigators including the Idaho Department of Water Resources pump testing program.
Nozzle Exchange
The proposed nozzle exchange part of the program will provide new standard brass
sprinkler nozzles to replace worn ones. This part of the program will target irrigators
with hand lines and wheel lines as well as solid set sprinklers systems. Additionally,
flow control nozzles will also be part of the program. Gasket and drain equipment will
also be available through this program element so that pivot system equipment
customers will have access to some instant savings measures. The reference to Nozzles
or Nozzle Exchange will also include drains and gaskets.
Primary design elements for the nozzle part of the program are:
No limits on the maximum number of nozzles.
Flow control nozzles will also be available and allowed to replace worn standard
nozzles.
Solid set sprinklers will be allowed.
Equipment suppliers will decide which nozzles are appropriate for participants.
Participants will have new nozzles in hand prior to the replacement and return of
old ones.
Center pivots sprinkler packages will not be eligible for the nozzle exchange, but
select pivot measures will be eligible for prescriptive incentives - see Pivot
measure description.
Gaskets and drain equipment will be available under similar terms as nozzles.
The primary time to replace nozzles is during the irrigation off-season; i.
November through March.
Pump Screening water management consultation
The pump screening & water management consultation portion of the program is a
simple audit of a customer s irrigation system promoting irrigation management and
identifying energy savings opportunities. The purpose of pump screening is two fold:
provide irrigation management information resulting in permanent changes that deliver
energy savings and to screen pumps prior to scheduling a full blown pump test. The
primary energy savings opportunities of the pump screening portion of the program
include:
Information on irrigation management
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 9/112005
Page 2
Information on pump operation to minimize demand charges
Identifying worn sprinkler nozzles, leaking gaskets and drains and referring them to
the nozzle exchange portion of the program
Identifying inefficient pumps for the pump testing portion of the program. This will
be done by measuring the wire-to-water efficiency using the utility meter
measuring pressures, lift, and estimating flow. It does not include direct
measurement of voltage, amps, power factor or flow directly.
The preferred time to do this work is in early spring for making impacts and
referrals to the nozzle and pump testing program. The work can be done when the
system is operating with a growing crop.
Pump Testing, pump repair and replacement
The proposed pump testing portion of the program will be a full pump test with some
audit of the irrigation system. This will include measuring pump lift, flow, electrical
demand and system pressures. This service goes beyond pump screening by directly
measuring voltage, amps, power factor and flow. This work will be performed after the
pump has been screened and the owner s financial criteria are understood.
System modification repairs and replacement
System modifications will be handled on a project specific basis with project specific
engineering and project specific incentives. There type of projects will be screened
during the pump check or pump test portion of the program and will generally be the
result of a grower needing to make some production driven changes to their irrigation
equipment.
Recommended Program Implementation
Nozzle Exchange
The overall program is designed to be delivered by a local third party program
administrator under contract with Utah Power. The program administrator will be
responsible for identifying and enlisting the support and cooperation of existing
irrigation supply stores who will inventory eligible equipment and provide them to
irrigators. The expanse of the Utah Power service territory makes it important for the
program administrator to enlist as many geographically distributed irrigation supply
stores as possible.
The benefits and logistics of the nozzle exchange program will be provided to irrigators
through short classes or information sheets developed as part of an overall
communication plan and delivered by the program administrator.
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 9/112005
Page 3
Pump Screening water management consultation
The program administrator will be responsible for fielding the staff to perform the
pump screening visits. If cost effective, there may be a possibility to use existing
consultants who perform field pump related services for Idaho Department of Water
Resources. Individuals or firms performing the pump screening work will have to work
closely with the nozzle and pump testing portion of the program.
Pivot measure equipment
Based on discussions with growers, incentives for certain pivot measures were added to
the proposed program design. The intent is to facilitate a high volume of replacement
of worn pivot components. The selected components were those that are easily
accessible and for which initial saving potential can be estimated with some certainty.
The list of equipment eligible for prescriptive incentives is not designed to be
exhaustive and other pivot measures will be considered eligible equipment and secure
incentives through project specific portion of the program if energy savings can be
calculated and the customer incurs costs to make the changes.
Pump Testing
As with other portions of the program, this segment will be delivered by the program
administrator who will be responsible for securing qualified firms or individuals to
perform this work. Pump tests will be primarily performed on pumps that have been
run through the pump screening portion of the program.
Pump tests can be done whenever the pumps are running. Testing during late summer
is generally preferred because most systems are operating at that time and any changes
are likely to take place after harvest. Pump repairs and replacements will be
recommended based on energy savings and eligibility.
System modification, re-designs and replacements
This portion of the program will target customer equipment change-outs or upgrades.
Engineering and incentives will be available on a project specific basis, likely after the
site has participated in the pump screen or pump test portion of the program. Baselines
will be adjusted as necessary to reflect changing equipment requirements driven by
factors outside the program. Project count in this portion of the program is expected to
be low compared to the other program offerings. Engineering approaches and incentive
offers will mirror the Energy FinAnswer program offering.
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 9/112005
Page 4
Marketing
Expected program participants include privately owned irrigated farms, large corporate
farms, irrigation districts, and irrigation suppliers. The program will be marketed by the
third party program administrator and in conjunction with marketing efforts for the
Load Control program. In addition, PacifiCorp program staff, irrigation field staff and
trade allies will all be potential sources of projects leads.
The PacifiCorp web site for energy efficiency programs will be updated with
information on the new Idaho program offering. The existing suite of promotional
program materials will be updated.
Incentives
Nozzle Exchange
The instant savings measure equipment, nozzles, gaskets and drains are a program
funded equipment incentive. The program administrator shall establish procedures and
requirements for a Nozzle Exchange portion of the program allowing Customer to
exchange existing eligible equipment for appropriately sized new equipment. Nozzle
program procedures, deadlines, and requirements will be posted on the PacifiCorp Web
site.
Center Pivot Equipment
Prescriptive incentives will be available for four specific measures applicable to pivot
systems; low pressure drains, sprinkler pressure regulators, low flow sprinkler
packages in place of standard flow packages and the addition of a low flow sprinkler
package to be used in conjunction with standard flow package on the same pivot.
Participants will receive fixed incentive per unit of equipment replaced to facilitate
participation and reduce administrative complexity.
Pump repair/replacement, system modification and re-design
Implementation incentives will be available for pump repairs/replacements, new
construction, major system upgrades and retrofits through the program per the terms of
Schedule 155. Similar to other Company programs, the program will fund project
specific engineering to provide the customer energy savings options that can be
implemented as an energy efficiency project. Program funded engineering analysis will
begin with a pump check and likely lead to a pump test. Additional engineering will be
r.:~ject specific. Requirements or guidelines for an energJ efficiency project, including
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 91112005
Page 5
minimum savings, eligible equipment, etc. will be developed during the final design
phase and made available on the Company web site.
The incentive formula for implementation incentives other than pivot measures
eligible for prescriptive incentives will be aligned with the Company s Energy
FinAnswer incentive formula which is the lesser of the sum of (a) and (b) OR (c):
(a) $0.12 /kWh for the Annual kWh savings as determined using
Utah Power provided or approved engineering analysis;
$50/kW for Average Monthly On Peak kW savings determined
using Utah Power provided or approved engineering analysis.(c) 50% of the EEM Cost as determined by the Utah Power.
Customers, who participate in both the federally funded water conservation programs
like the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality
Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Company program, may have incentives adjusted
so funding from both sources does not exceed 100% of the costs.
(b)
Projected results
Based on the market characterization performed by Fazio Engineering and the
application of a conservative net-to-gross ratio of .75 for selected measures (see Fazio
document in Attachment 5), net results for November 2005 through December 2006
are estimated at 4 221 MWH with 2007 results estimated at 3 681 MWH. At this time
the Company is not projecting significant on-peak capacity reductions in addition to
the load control program.
Irrigation Efficiency Program Description 9/1/2005
Page 6
Irrigation Efficiency
Evaluation Plan
This is a general evaluation plan for the Idaho Irrigation Efficiency program and
describes general approaches. An exact scope of work will be determined each year.
The program will be offered for three years and this evaluation plan assumes an annual
evaluation with both process and impact components. An impact evaluation will be
completed by the end of the first year and annually thereafter. A first year process
evaluation will also be undertaken in order to quickly inform the Company of any
program administration issues or opportunities. It is anticipated at least one process
evaluation will be undertaken during the program duration, but the need for a process
evaluation will be determined by program results and the company program manager.
All Irrigation Efficiency program evaluations will be performed by a third party
evaluator selected and retained by the company for this specific task.
Overview
The goals of the evaluation are to:
1. Estimate actual energy (kWh) and demand (kW) savings
2. Analyze Program cost effectiveness
3. Assess Program delivery
Impact Evaluation
The impact evaluation will include collecting key data, selecting a statistically valid
sample of participants , performing on-site evaluations of the project, estimating energy
savings including modeling of projects where appropriate, and assessing cost
effectiveness. The impact evaluation approach will vary by type of measure installed.
The impact evaluation for three separate components of the Irrigation Efficiency
program; Nozzle Exchange, Pump Screening and water management consultation
Pump Testing and System Modifications will be measure specific.
Measure Verification
PacifiCorp, through its Program administrator, has a comprehensive quality assurance
process in place for this Program consisting of:
Idaho Irrigation Efficiency Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 1
Nozzle exchange
Nozzle exchange participant requirements to insure installation of equipment
within the territory and appropriate application of equipment.
Program administrator review of nozzle exchange participant tracking
information.
Program administrator sampling, phone verification and on -site inspection of
a sample of the nozzle exchange participant projects.
Center Pivot Equipment
Pivot equipment participant requirements to insure installation of equipment
within territory and appropriate application of equipment.
Program administrator review of equipment and sprinkler system participant
tracking information.
Program administrator sampling, phone verification and on-site inspection of a
sample of the center pivot equipment and sprinkler system projects.
Pump screening and water management consultation
Pump screening participant requirements to insure delivery of services for
appropriate equipment.
Program administrator review of pump screening participant tracking
information.
Program administrator sampling, phone verification and on -site inspection of
a sample of the pump screening participant projects.
Pump testing, pump repair and replacement, system modifications & re-design
Pump testing, pump repair and system modification & re-design requirements
to insure delivery of services for appropriate equipment.
Program administrator review and approvals of energy efficiency measures
identified by the pump testing and system analysis.
Program administrator review and inspection of pump repair projects.
The evaluator will review the quality assurance process to assure that each of these
steps has been fully implemented. In addition, the evaluator will independently review
a sample of the quality assurance and inspection reports. Based on this review the
evaluator will assess the level of on-site verification required.
Establishment of Baseline Operating Practices
and Efficiency levels
Determination of what would have happened in the absence of the effort is key in
assessing the effects of an efficiency program. Through review of project file data, the
Idaho Irrigation Efficiency Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 2
evaluator will characterize the baseline operating practices and efficiency levels and
the prevailing standard practice of equipment operation.
Specifically, the evaluator will characterize:
Estimated existing and improved operational practices and resulting
efficiency levels.
Estimated operational practices and resulting efficiency levels in the absence
of this program.
Site visits will be conducted to determine whether:
Original assumptions used in the energy analysis report were reasonable
Anal ysis methods are appropriate
Measures were installed as planned
Measures operated as planned
Inspections were appropriate and conducted properly.
Any fundamental differences will be identified and revised savings analysis will be
provided.
Savings Analysis
Evaluated energy and demand savings will be estimated using one or more of the
following methods:
Simulation modeling
Engineering calculations
Billing or metering data analysis
Conduct Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
The evaluator will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis using traditional cost-
effectiveness analysis methods. The analysis will include the standard perspectives
(i., utility, ratepayers, participants, and society). The benefits to PacifiCorp include
the reduction in energy consumption and the Company s avoided costs. For
participants, benefits include reduction in energy costs.
Process Eval uation
In order to inform the Company about issues or opportunities regarding the
delivery and administration of the Program a process evaluation will be
conducted annually. The process evaluation will include interviews with
utility staff, and participants.
Idaho Irrigation Efficiency Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 3
Survey Program Administration and Utility Staff
The evaluator will interview program administration and utility staff regarding:
Customer application process( es )
Customer eligibility criteria and the verification process
Marketing
Vendor relations
Program data collection
Utility and implementer coordination
Participant Survey Design and Implementation
After reviewing the project files, the evaluator will complete telephone surveys with
Program participants. The aim of the survey will be to determine:
How each participant learned about the Program
Their assessment of the value of the Irrigation Efficiency Program services
Impact of the Irrigation Efficiency Program services on their operation and
maintenance practices
Satisfaction with the PacifiCorp hired energy consultant
Satisfaction with their participation in the Program
Whether they implemented any additional energy efficiency measures and
whether the Program influenced them to do so.
Develop Findings and Recommendations
The evaluator will analyze the collected data and opinions to assess Program strengths
weaknesses, bottlenecks, areas for improvement, and best practices.
Management & Reporti
The evaluator will deliver a draft and final report of findings. The final report will
reflect all the comments made by stakeholders. It will provide a complete description
of the relevant evaluation objectives and how they were achieved. The final report is to
contain the following elements:
Executive Summary
Description of the Program, its goals, and objectives
Statement of the evaluation goals and objectives
Discussion of methodologies
Implementation procedures and assumptions for each method
Idaho Irrigation Efficiency Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 4
Data-collection procedures and methods
Sample design and sample attrition
Results and their interpretation (demonstrated clearly with charts and tables)
Idaho lITigation Efficiency Program Evaluation Plan 9/1/2005
Page 5
Date:August 30, 2005
To:Don Jones Jr.
From:Brian Hedman
Re:Idaho C&I Programs
This report provides a cost-effectiveness analysis of PacifiCorp s proposed commercial
and industrial programs for the state of Idaho: Energy FinAnswer, FinAnswer Express
and Irrigation. The analysis is based on the August 2005 update of the 2004 IRP
decrement avoided costs and the June 30, 2005 Palo Verde avoided costs. The discount
rate used for the Total Resource Cost (TRC) is the U.S. Treasury Long-term Composite
Rate as of August 19,2005. The discount rate for the Utility Cost, Rate Impact and
Participant Cost tests is the after-tax weighted cost of capital from PacifiCorp s 2004
Integrated Resource Plan. Cost effectiveness parameters for line losses and 2004 average
retail rates were provided by PacifiCorp s regulation department.
The following tables present the evaluation inputs, the per-unit costs and savings
assumptions, the total program cost, and the 2005 updated IRP decrement and the June
, 2005 forward price curve base case avoided costs results on an individual program
basis and with FinAnswer and FinAnswer Express combined.
Table 1: Common Program Inputs
Discount Rate for TRC test
Discount Rate for UTC, RIM, PART tests
Line Loss
Energy Rate ($/kWh)
4.44%
176%
Commercial- 10.23%
Industrial- 6.62%
Irrigation - 10.23%
Commercial - $.0595
Industrial - $.0341
Irrigation - $.0376
Don Jones Jr.
August 30, 2005
Page 2
FinAnswer Express
The FinAnswer Express program is cost effective from a total resource cost, utility cost
and participant perspective. It fails the rate impact test, indicating that there will be some
rate impact.
Table 2: Costs and Savings
28,672 28,672
88,764 58,999 147 763
88,012 245 170
012 170,309
Total 293,460 223,541 517 001
Table 3: IRP 51 % Load Factor Decrement
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0469 $784 983 212 119 $427 136 544
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0469 $784 983 101 926 $316,943 1.404
No Adder
Utilit Cost Test (UCT)0311 $422 764 $859 053 $436,289 032
Rate Impact Test 323 343 $859,053 $464 290 649
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$362 218 034 682 $672,463 857
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.0000170886
Table 4: June 30, 2005 Base Case Forward Prices
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0469 $784 983 275 130 $490 148 624
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0469 $784 983 159 209 $374 227 1.477
No Adder
Utili Cost Test (UCT)0311 $422 764 $907 710 $484 946 147
Rate Impact Test 323,343 $907 710 $415 633 686
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$362 218 034 682 $672,463 857
Lifec cle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.0000078484
Don Jones Jr.
August 30, 2005
Page 3
Energy FinAnswer
The Energy FinAnswer program is also cost effective from all perspectives except the
rate impact test, which indicates there will be some rate impact.
Table 5: Costs and Savings
1 $406,000 $207 000
2 $1 168,000 $630 000
3 $1 627 000 $755,000
Total $3,201 000 $1 592 000
Savings adjusted to reflect 80% net-to-gross ratio
$613 000
798,000
382 000
$4,793 000
850,000
560 000
940 000
350,000
Table 6: IRP 65 % Load Factor Decrement
Total Resource Cost Test (TRG)0375 538,102 $8,830,188 292 087 594
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0375 538 102 $8,027,444 $2,489,342 1 .449
No Adder
Utilit Cost Test (UCT)0336 072 104 $6,352,463 280,359 560
Rate Impact Test $8,607 700 352,463 255 237 738
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$1,465 998 $5,149,117 $3,683,119 512
Lifec cle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.0000830059
Table 7: June 30, 2005 Base Case Forward Prices
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0375 $5,538,102 $10 698,468 $5,160 366 932
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0375 $5,538 102 725,880 187 778 756
No Adder
Utilit Cost Test (UCT)0336 072 104 767 734 695 630 908
Rate Impact Test $8,607 700 767 734 $839 966 902
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$1,465,998 149 117 683 119 512
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.0000158610
Irrigation
The Irrigation program values assume a 75% Net-to-Gross factor. Even with this
assumption the program is cost effective from the TRC, UCT and PCT perspective under
Don Jones Jr.
August 30, 2005
Page 4
the June 30, 2005 Base Case forward price curves as well as under the August 2005
update of the 2004 IRP 24% load factor avoided costs. It fails the RIM test in both cases,
which indicates there may be some rate impact.
Table 8: Costs and Savings
Total
$72 850
$160 630
$160 130
$393,610
$36
$450,595
$407 820
$894 569
$109,
$611 225
$567 950
288,179
Table 9: IRP 24 % Load Factor Decrement
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0498 523 513 864,490 $340,977 224
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0498 523 513 694 991 $171,478 113
No Adder
Utili Cost Test (UCT)0388 $1,095 157 514 712 $419 555 383
Rate Impact Test 102 911 $1,514,712 $588,198 720
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$428 356 204 210 $775 854 811
Lifec cle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.0000216491
Table 10: June 30, 2005 Base Case Forward Prices
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0498 523 513 062 230 $538 717 354
+ Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)0498 523,513 874 754 $351 241 231
No Adder
Utili Cost Test (UCT)0388 095 157 684 156 $588 999 538
Rate Impact Test 102 911 684 156 $418 754 801
Participant Cost Test (PCT)$428 356 204 210 $775 854 811
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kW $0.0000154126
Combined FinAnswer and FinAnswer Express Programs
We also examined an option to file the FinAnswer mId FinAnswer Express programs as a
comprehensive commercial and industrial energy efficiency program. The combined
Don Jones Jr.
August 30, 2005
Page 5
program is cost effective from all perspectives except the rate impact test, which indicates
there may be some rate impact.
Table 11: Combined Programs: IRP Decrement
Total Resource Cost Test $0.0382 323 084 $10,042 307 $3,719 223 588
(PTRC) + Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)$0.0382 323 084 $9,129,370 806 286 1 .444
No Adder
Utili Cost Test (UCT)$0.0335 $4,494,868 211 516 716,648 604
Rate Impact Test $9,931 044 211,516 719,527 726
Participant Cost Test (PCT)828 216 $6,183,798 355 582 382
Lifec cle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.00010009
Table 12: Combined Programs: Base Case Forward Prices
Total Resource Cost Test $0.0382 323 084 $11 973 598 650,514 894
(PTRC) + Conservation Adder
Total Resource Cost Test (TRC)$0.0382 323 084 $10 885 089 562 005 721
No Adder
Utili Cost Test (UCT)$0.0335 $4,494 868 675,445 180,576 930
Rate Impact Test 931 044 $8,675,445 255 599 874
Participant Cost Test (PCT)828 216 183 798 355,582 382
Lifecycle Revenue Impacts ($/kWh $0.00002371