20050907Additional Comments by Rep. Rydalch.pdf

IL~
;J Qr1IU
Jean Jewell
11o
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ed Howell
Wednesday, September 2005 2:53
Jean Jewell; Ed Howell; Gene Fadness; Tonya Clark
Comment acknowledgement
WWW Form Submission:
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
1: 52 : 59
Case: PAC-E-05-09
Name: Rep. Ann Rydalch.
Street Address: 3824 E. 17th St.
City: Idaho Falls
State: 10
ZIP: 83406
Home Telephone: [phone]E-Mail: ann. rydalch~ inl. gov
Company: PacifiCorpmailinglist _yes _no: yes
Comment description: I want to clarify my concern about the submittal I made to the PUC
yesterday regarding the Schwendiman proj ect. I am requesting that the PUC approve directly
the Schwendiman proj ect. I do not want them lumped in with other proj ects and then be
grandfathered. I was in error in the understanding of the options. Again the PUC has the
authori ty to sign/allow this contract between the Schwendiman proj ect and PacifiCorp and I
am asking that you do that. I support this proj ect as a stand alone proj ect. They are my
constituents that are involved. This means alot to the farmers, alot to the county and
alot to the State. Last year the Idaho Legislature passed alot of legislation in support
of energy development and small business/business development. I am hoping the PUC, and
the staff, will listen to the maj ori ty of constituents whose representatives in the
Legislature passed those pieces of legislation, and concur in the expanded and fair vision
in energy for Idaho. Again, let met re- iterate - I do support the Schwendiman proj ect. The
sooner that is okayed, the sooner these unfortunate delays can be rectified. I would also
recommend the PUC re-visit and go back to the 10 average MW and not the 100 killowatts.
That will kill legislation we passed last year. Thank you for the chance to comment.
Rep. Ann Rydalch, Idaho Falls
Transaction 10: 971352.Referred by: http: / /www. puc. state. id. us/ scripts/polyform. dll/ ipuc
User Address: 164.165.73.216
User Hostname: 164.165.73.216