HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130611Compliance Filing.pdfYPncrnConp\ a mD f,iEircAN ENEROY HOLO0{68 @MH tY
June 11,2013
VIA OWRNIGHT DELIWRY
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472West Washington
Boise,lD 83702-5983
Ms. Jean D. Jewell
Commission Secretary
Re: Idaho Docket No. PAC-E-05-08 Compliance
To the Idaho Public Utilities Commission:
PacifiCorp submits the attachments in compliance with the Commission's Order in this case
issued on February 13,2006 and amended on March 14,2006. The Order approved the
Stipulation supporting the acquisition of PacifiCorp by MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Company.
Commitmentl2} of the Stipulation provides that PacifiCorp will provide to the Commission, on
an informational basis, credit rating agency news releases and final reports regarding PacifiCorp
when such reports are known to PacifiCorp and are available to the public.
Therefore, in compliance with Commitment I20 of the Stipulation, please find the attached report
related to PacifiCorp.
Very truly yours,
V/(,,LG 714,""J^-
Mark C. Moench
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Enclosure
ll
Ma* C. Moench
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
201 S. Main Street, Suite 2400
Salt Lake City, UT 81111
801-220-4459 Oflice
801-2204058 Fax
ma r h mo en c h@1t a c iJi c o rp. c om
rti
FitchRatings
FITCH RATES PACIFICORPIS $3OOMM ISSUANCE OF FIRST
MORTGAGE BONDS'A-'; OUTLOOK STABLE
Fitch Ratings-New York-04 June 2013: Fitch Ratings has assigned an'A-'rating to PacifiCorp's
(PPW) $300 million issuance of 2.95%o, first mortgage bonds due June l, 2023. Proceeds will be
used to fund utility capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes. The notes will rank on
parity in right of payment with all existing and future secured debt. The Rating Outlook for PPW is
Stable.
Stable Outlook: PPW's rating and Stable Outlook reflects the company's solid financial position,
competitive resource base and relatively balanced and diversified regulatory environment. The
Stable Outlook assumes reasonable outcomes in pending and future rate proceedings to recover
anticipated, significant capital investment. PPW's ratings are standalone, reflecting its credit
profile. PPW is owned by MidAmerican Energy ('BBB+' IDR, Stable Outlook), which in turn, is
90% owned by Berkshire Hathaway Corp. ('AA-'IDR, Stable Outlook). The ownership structure
provides flexibility in managing PPW capital structure and liquidity position.
KEY RATINTG DRIVERS:
--PPW is ring-fenced by special purpose entities to preserve credit quality.
-Solid financial metrics.
--Balanced and diversified regulatory environment.
--Reduced capex plan.
--Good liquidity.
--Manageable debt re-financing levels.
Solid Financial Metrics: Fitch expects financial metrics to remain comparable to or slightly ahead
of guideline metrics for the risk profile and rating category, with forecasts for EBlTDA-to-interest
to trend upward of 4.8 times (x) and funds from operations (FFO) to debt to near 19% through
2015. Fitch attributes lower FFO in the forecast period to the absence of bonus depreciation.
Balanced and Diversified Regulatory Environment: PPW has regulated electric generation,
distribution and transmission operations across six western states which limits exposure to any one
regulatory jurisdiction. The utility receives fairly balanced regulatory treatment, with multi-year
rate plans complete in Idaho, Utah and Wyoming; and, existing rate-making features allowing for
timely recovery of, or deferral of capital investments. Power cost adjustment mechanisms cover
over 90%o ofutility retail electric sales.
PPW has two pending general rate cases on which Fitch anticipates fair outcomes. In Oregon PPW
requested a S56 million electric rate increase based on a 9.8o/o retum on equity (ROE); and, in
Washington the utility requested a $42.8 million electric rate increase based on a l0% ROE.
Reduced Capex Plan: Utility capital investments are forecast at just over $1 billion in 2013, and
just under $6 billion through 2017. The five-year capex plan is nearly $2 billion lower than prior
projections largely due to lower forecast load growth. Management has also delayed invesftnents in
new generation and transmission; and, plans to convert the Naughton Unit 3 from coal to natural
gas to manage environmental compliance costs.
PPW's capex program is focused on transmission, distribution and environmental invesfinents, and
is generally consistent with public policy goals in the region. Rating concerns for PPW include
execution and recovery of its capex program; and, the emergence of more stringent environmental
rules and regulations.
Good Liquidity: The utility's liquidity position at March 31,2013 was $1.02 billion, including
$133 million in available cash. PPW's stand-alone bank credit is $1.2 billion and includes trvo
separate credit facilities, each sized at $600 million, and which mature in 2017 and 2018,
respectively. Bank credit supports the utility's commercial paper program and provides for the
issuance of letters ofcredit.
Manageable Debt Re-Financings: Debt maturities include $261 million due in 2013; $253 million
due in 2014; $122 million due in 2015; $57 million due in 2016:' and, $52 million due in 2017.
Fitch considers the re-financing risk as low and views access to the capital markets as unrestricted.
RATING SENSITIVITIES:
--A positive rating action on PPW could occur if FFO to debt were to increase and be sustained near
20%.
--A negative rating action on PPW could occur if FFO to debt were to decrease and be sustained
below 16%.
Contact:
Primary Analyst
Lindsay Minneman
Director
+t-212-908-0592
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
One State Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Secondary Analyst
Phil Smyth, CFA
Senior Director
+l-212-908-0531
Committee Chairperson
Glen Grabelsky
Managing Director
+t-212-908-0577
Media Relations: Brian Bertsch, New York, Tel: +l 212-908-0549, Email:
brian.bertsch@fi tchratings. com.
Additional information is available at'www.fitchratings.com'.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Corporate Rating Methodology', AuB. 8, 2012;
--'Rating North American Utilities, Gas and Water Companies', May 16, 201l;
--'Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Utilities', Nov. 13,2012;
--'Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage', Aug 8,2012.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage
http ://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt id:6855 52
Corporate Rating Methodology
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id:684460
Rating North American Utilities, Power, Gas, and Water Companies
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id:625129
Recovery Ratings and Notching Criteria for Utilities
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id:693750
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND
DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY
FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COIWUNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION,
RATTNG DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE
ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'. PUBLISHED
RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT
ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALIry, CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE'CODE OF CONDUCT' SECTION
OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO
THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE
FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH TIIE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED
ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY ST]MMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE
FITCH WEBSITE.