20061120Quarterly debt report.pdf

~~S !!:~H~QI~N \ 1:-' Ii'RECE\.,;l:L
Pacific Power
Rocky Mountain Power
825 NE Multnomah St., Suite 2000
Portland, OR 97232
200& NOV 20 AH 9: 06
~~ , . ! ,
eX ". i ,(;i '/.\(lU i "
./". ""
IL\li:o ::, r'C\i'~i';) IU,"IC,,) 'v V". "
November 17 2006
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington
Boise, Idaho 83702-5983
Attn: Ms. Jean D. Jewell
Commission Secretary
Re:Quarterly Debt Report
Pursuant to Case No. PAC-05-, PacifiCorp (the Company) hereby files an original and eight
copies of its debt report for the period ended September 30, 2006 as well as recent write-ups
from major bond rating agencies.
I Long-Term Debt Activity:
Amount outstanding at June 30, 2006 909 424 000
Issuances
10% FMBs due August 2036 350 000 000
Maturities None
Amount outstanding at September 30, 2006 $4.259.424.000
I Long-Term Debt Authorization:
Amount authorized May 17 2005 by Order No. 29787 000 000 000
Issuances
June 13 , 2005
August 10, 2006
5.25% FMBs due June 2035
10% FMBs due August 2036
(300 000 000)
(350 000 000)
Remaining authorization at September 30, 2006 $350.000.000
If you have any questions regarding this summary, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
'JYhjf (jJ
Matt Fechner
Treasury Analyst
Enclosure
F i tch,!lw~!~~gs Corporate Finance
Global Power/North America
Credit Analysis PacifiCorp
(Subsidiary of MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Co.
Ratings
Security Current Previous
Class Rating RatinglOR BBB+
Senior Secured A- Sr. Unsecured BBB+ A-
Preferred Stock BBB BBB+
Short-Term (DR F2
!DR - Issuer defimlt rating. NR - Not rateci
Date
Changed
1/31106
1/31106
1131106
1131106
1216105
Rating Watch.......................
.................
....... None
Rating Outlook...
......................................
Stable
Analysts
Philip W. Smyth, CFA
[phone]
philip. smyth~ fitcbratings. corn
Karen Anderson
[phone]
karen. anderson~tchratings. com
Profile
PPW is an indirect operating utility subsidiary
of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., which
is 88% owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
PPW provides integrated electric service to
1.6 million retail customers in parts of six
Western states: Utah, Oregon, Wyoming,
Washington, Idaho and California.
Related Research
Credit Analysis: March 7, 2006.
Credit Update: April 14, 2005.
Key Credit Strengths
Solid operating cash flow and
financial position.
Relatively Jow-cost energy resource
base.
Key Credit Concerns
Ongoing negative tree cash flow due tD
high capital expenditure requirements.
Growing reliance on natural gas-fired
generation.
Adverse Oregon tax ruling in GRC
may signal deterioration in the state
regulatory climate.
August 31, 2006
Rating Rationale
PacifiCorp s (PPW) ratings and Stable Rating Outlook reflect the
company solid operating cash flow and financial position
competitive resource base, and relatively low business risk profile. The
ratings assume reasonable outcomes in pending and future rate
proceedings. Fitch Ratings' analysis also takes into account the
utility's projected above-industry-average service territory growth
(primarily in its Eastern service territory), significant planned
investment in new plant and infrastructure to meet its load
requirements, and its growing exposure to gas-fired generating
capacity.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2006, are
expected to approximate $945 million. The primary credit concern is
the potential for unsupportive regulatory actions, especially in light of
the company s large construction budget and historically low earned
returns. Additionally, PPW faces growing exposure to gas-fired
generation and potentially high commodity costs in the event of a
prolonged, unscheduled, base-load plant outage during a period of high
demand. Recent unfavorable regulatory developments in Washington
and uncertainty regarding utility tax policy in Oregon are sources of
concern for investors.
Fitch views recent general rate case (GRC) settlements in PPW's two
largest jurisdictions, Utah and Oregon, favorably. In addition, PPW
recently implemented rate increases consistent with the terms of its
commission-approved stipulation in its Wyoming GRC (see the Recent
Developments section for further information). However, regulators
and policy makers in Oregon continue to send mixed signals to
investors. The Oregon Public Utility Commission s (OPUC)
anticipated September 2006 final order in a proceeding to establish
permanent rules implementing Senate Bill No. 408 (SB 408) could
have an adverse effect on PPW. Fitch notes that the OPUC reduced
PPW's revenue requirement by $26.6 million in its 2005 GRC to
reflect the provisions of SB 408, which was enacted in September
2005.
Recent Developments
PPW recently reached settlement agreements in its pending GRCs in
Utah and Oregon, which, if approved by regulators, would result in
base-rate increases of$l15 million and $43 million, respectively.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement in Utah, the $115 million
(10%) rate increase will be phased in, with the rates scheduled to
increase of $85 million (7.4%) initially on Dec. 11 2006. The second-
phase rate increase of $30 million (2.6%) is to be implemented on
www.fitchratings.com
F i tch,!lw~!t~~gs Corporate Finance
June 1, 2007. PPW agreed not to file another GRC
until after Dec. 11, 2007. In addition, PPW agreed to
withdraw its petition to implement a fuel-adjustment
mechanism in Utah. Hearings on the proposed
settlement are scheduled to begin later this month
and a final order is expected in the fall of2006.
The $43 million rate increase included in the
settlement of PPW's 2006 Oregon GRC, if approvedby the commission, would be effective on
Jan. 1 2007. Under the terms of the agreement, PPW
will not file a new rate case prior to Sept. 1, 2007. A
final OPUC ruling is expected in December 2006.
Earlier this year, PPW received approval trom the
Wyoming Public Service Commission for a total
annual rate increase of $25 million, a power cost-
adjustment mechanism and an agreement to utilize a
forward test year in its next GRC. The rate increase
was phased in under the terms of the settlement, with
the initial $15 million rate increase effective on
March 1, 2006, and the remaining $10 million on
July 1 2006.
In addition, settlements have been reached with
parties in Idaho and California that would permit
annual rate increases of $8.million and
$7.3 million, respectively.
In April 2006, the Washington Utilities and
Transportation Commission (WUTC) issued an order
in response to PPW's GRC filed in May 2005. The
order denied the utility's $30 million rate increase
request. The WUTC also rejected PPW's subsequent
petition for reconsideration and a limited rate
increase of not less that $11 million. In Fitch's view
the WUTC's rejection ofPPW's rate increase request
is a setback for the interjurisdictional cost allocation
method under the revised protocol and is a hurdle to
improved earned returns. The company is evaluating
its legal and regulatory options to recover prudently
incurred costs in Washington.
Liquidity and Debt StructureAt June 30, 2006, PPW had approximately
$304 million of short-term debt outstanding and cash
and equivalents of $73 million on its balance sheet.
On Aug. 7 2006, PPW issued $350 million 6.10% of
its first mortgage bonds, due in 2036. Proceeds trom
the issuance will be used to repay short-term debt and
for general corporate purposes.
PPW'total long- and short-term debt was
$4.3 billion, and its debt-to-total capital ratio was
51% at June 30 2006. Debt-to-funds trom
operations, at the end of the second quarter of 2006
was 5.1 times (x). PPW received a $74 million capital
infusion in the second quarter trom its direct parent
PacifiCorp Holdings, Inc.
During July 2006, PPW renegotiated its committed
$800 million revolving credit facility, extending the
maturity date to July 2011 trom August 2010. The
credit agreement contains a maximum debt-to-total
capitalization covenant of 65%.
Rating Outlook Rationale
The Stable Rating Outlook assumes balanced
regulatory outcomes in response to pending and
prospective rate filings. However recent
regulatory developments have been mixed.
PPW recently filed proposed settlement
agreements with regulators in its respective GRC
filings in Oregon and Utah. The filing of the
proposed settlements along with the
implementation of higher rates and adoption of a
fuel-adjustment mechanism in Wyoming, are
constructive events, in Fitch's view.
Less favorable regulatory events include the
rejection of PPW's proposed rate increase in its
2005 GRC in Washington, the 2005 rate cut
related to implementation of SB 408 in its 2005
Oregon GRC and continuing uncertainty
regarding final SB 408 rules, which are expected
to be issued by September 2006.
What Could Lead to Positive Rating
Action?
Greater than anticipated relative debt
reduction.
What Could Lead to Negative Rating
Action?
Adverse regulatory developments, especiallyin light of the company large capital
expenditures program.
. A major, extended generating plant outage.
PacifiCorp
F i tc~!!~!~~gs Corporate Finance
Financial Summary - PacifiCorp
($ Mil., Fiscal Years Ended March 31)
LTM
6/30/06 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Fundamental Ratios (x)
Funds from Operations/Interest Expense 4.2
Cash from Operations/Interest Expense
Debt/Funds from Operations 5.4 12.
Operating EBITllnterest Expense
Operating EBITDAllnterest Expense 4.4
Debt/Operating EBITDA
Common Dividend Payout (%)35.65.65.94.98.
Internal CashiCapital Expenditures (%)62.76.74.121.133.4 6.4
Capital Expenditures/Depreciation (%)244.190.158.128.116.125.4
Profitability
Revenues 875 897 049 195 082 354
Net Revenues 347 352 101 038 902 888
O&M Expense 016 015 913 896 885 781
Operating EBITOA 232 240 093 047 923 017
Depreciation and Amortization Expense 453 448 437 429 434 403
Operating EBIT 779 792 656 618 489 614
Interest Expense 279 267 257 270 228 221
Net Income for Common 355 359 250 245 133 315
O&M % of Net Revenues 43.43.43.44.46.41.4
Operating EBIT % of Net Revenues 33.33.31.30.25.32.
Cash Flow
Cash Flow from Operations 817 895 711 832 682 343
Change in Working Capital (19)(103)(28)(75)
Funds from Operations 836 840 814 860 756 333
Dividends (126)(177)(195)(165)(7)(310)
Capital Expenditures 108)(852)(690)(550)(505)(505)
Free Cash Flow (418)(134)(175)117 169 (473)
Net Other Investment Cash Flow (13)(63)
Net Change in Debt (138)(266)472 (57)(297)668
Net Change in Equity 433 485 143 (100)
Capital Structure
Short-Term Debt 659 405 742 369 162 322
Long-Term Debt 620 762 678 577 759 895
Total Debt 278 167 420 945 921 217
Preferred and Minority Equity 108 116
Common Equity 121 011 336 279 194 892
Total Capital 441 219 797 265 224 225
Total DebVTotal Capital (%)50.50.56.54.54.58.4
Preferred and Minority EquitylTotal Capital (%)
Common EquitylTotal Capital (%)48.48.42.45.44.40.
L TM - Latest 12 months. Operating EBIT - Operating income before nonrecurring items. Operating EBITDA - Operating income before
nonrecurring items plus depreciation and amortization expense. O&M - Operations and maintenance. Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding
and are adjusted for interest and principal payments on transition property securitization certificates. Long-term debt includes trust preferred
securities. Sou Ire: Financial data obtained from SNL Energy Information System, provided under license by SNL Financial, LC of Charlottesville
Va.
Copyright II:) 2006 by Fitcb, Inc.. Fitch !Wings Ud. and its subsidiaries One State Street Plaza, NY. NY J0004.
Telephone; 1-800-753-4824, [phone]. Fax, [phone]. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in pan is prohihited except by permission. All rights reserved. All of the
informalion contained herein is based on infonnation obtained from issuers, other obligors, nnderwrite". and other sources which Fitch belicves to be reliable. Fitch does not audit or verify the
truth or accuracy of any such informalion. As a result, the informalion in this repon is provided "as is" without any representation or waIranty of any kmd. A FItch rating is an opinion as to the
creditworthiness of a security. The rariog does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentione!l Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of
any security. A repon providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the infonnation assembled, verified and presented to investo" by the issuer and its agents in connection
with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in !be sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort
Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. !Wings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or !berax-
exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insure". gueranto". other obligo", and underwriters for rating securities. Sueh fees
generally vary from USSJOOO to US$750OOO (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In cenain cases. Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, Ot insured
or guamnteed by a particular insurer nr guarantor. for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$IO OOO to US$I 500 oo0 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The
assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an """en in connection with any registretion statement filed under the
United States securities laws. the Financial Services and MarketS Act of 2000 of Great Britain. or the securities la"" of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relarive efficiency of electronic
publishing and distriburion, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribe" up (0 three days earlier than to print subscribers.
PacifiCorp