Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20231012Comments.pdfMatthew A.Nykiel (ISB No.10270) 710 N 6th Street Boise,ID 83701 (719)439-5895 matthew.nykiel@gmail.com Attorney for the Idaho Conservation League BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER IDAHO POWER COMPANY’S APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT CHANGES TO THE COMPENSATION STRUCTURE APPLICABLE TO CUSTOMER ON-SITE GENERATION UNDER SCHEDULES 6,8,AND 84 AND TO ESTABLISH AN EXPORT CREDIT METHODOLOGY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.IPC-E-23-14 INITIAL COMMENTS IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE Comments COMES NOW the Idaho Conservation League (“ICL”),and through counsel,submits these initial comments to the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”)regarding Idaho Power Company’s (“IPC”or “Company”)application in the above captioned matter.ICL recognizes the imperative to decarbonize the whole energy system as rapidly as feasible,and supports distributed solar and other energy resources (“DER”)as key components of a renewable-centric grid.To this end,ICL participated in each phase of Idaho Power’s efforts to alter customer generation offerings and the forgoing dockets before the Commission.We welcome resolution on the matter,and urge the Commission and Company to consider these comments and those of other intervening parties and the public in designing an equitable and durable distributed energy program. IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 1 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments RECEIVED 2023 OCTOBER 12, 2023 4:30PM IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION We initially recommend that the Commission: 1.Adjust the Company’s Export Credit Rate (“ECR”)methodology to include marginal line loss calculations and avoided cost figures based on battery storage as the alternative dispatchable resource. 2.Afford customer generators necessary stability by authorizing an update period longer than the Company’s proposed one year. 3.Provide for a transitional rate for net metering customers. 4.Afford the full financial value of unused Export Credits to customers rolling over into the next annual billing period. 5.Approve the Company's request to lift and alter the project eligibility cap for residential, commercial,and irrigation customer self generators. In addition to these recommendations we raise concerns of considering this docket concurrently with Idaho Power’s general rate case,IPC-E-23-11.As detailed in the Company’s Application1 and the direct testimony of Connie Aschenenbrenner2 matterns affecting net metering schedules are divided between this docket and the general rate case.Broadly,this docket considers export matters,while the rate case addresses consumption rates and cost allocation.And while this regulatory division is formally correct,concurrently filing these dockets has confused customers and complicated analysis in each matter.The effect of running the two dockets together is like a multivariate equation:movement one inherently informs a response in the other.The core public policy concerns and motivation to bring this docket are the affordability of distributed 2 Aschenbrenner,DI at 20. 1 Application at 2. IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 2 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments generation and cost shifting between customer classes.Both directly depend on the financial and policy outcomes of the rate case. At the time of these comments,the Company,Staff,and Intervenor Parties to the general rate case have reached a settlement in principle.3 The proposed settlement has not been fully drafted,delivered to or approved by the Commission,and remains confidential.4 While the matters in this docket are formally distinct from those in the rate case and an unapproved settlement remains unenforceable,the practical effect of considering this docket now is that some parties have access to confidential information affecting Schedules 6,8,and 84 while others and the public do not. We stop short of recommending an altered schedule in this docket,though it may become necessary as fairness dictates as each docket resolves.Instead,we urge Parties and the Commission to be mindful of the informational and procedural imbalances arising out of concurrent consideration of this docket and the rate case.While parties may have the technical and informational capacity to jointly assess these dockets,such analysis and bill estimation is a tall order for customers and interested businesses.We welcome the Commission’s decision to extend the public comment period to November 8;this does much to help customers'inclusion.5 Still,while we are hopeful settlement in the rate case will resolve smoothly,that process may fall through and will,as scheduled,not be resolved by the Commission before then.6 Until then, analysis in this case and prospective bill impacts are moving targets. 6 IPC-E-23-11,Notice of Schedule,Order No.35873.Technical hearings in the rate case are scheduled beginning November 29,continuing as needed. 5 IPC-E-23-11,Notice of Public Comment Deadline,Order No.35955. 4 Commission Rule 272.ICL and intervenors in this docket Micron,Inc.,Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho,IIPA, City of Boise,and Idahydro are also parties to the rate case,IPC-E-23-11.The remaining intervenor Vote Solar is not a party. 3 IPC-E-23-11,Order Vacating Testimony Deadlines,Order No.35954;ICL is an intervening party in the Company’s rate case,Order No.35850. IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 3 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments Indeed,reaching resolution on the Company’s customer generation offerings has been lengthy.The preceding scoping7 and study8 dockets afforded the topic due thoroughness and detail,but not without a year’s each of time invested.We are sensitive to existing and prospective distributed energy customers with interest in speedy resolution and certainty around Schedules 6, 8,and 84.Many hope to resolve these matters expeditiously to better assess the viability of pending projects and secure financial incentives.Appropriate process and resolution remains,as always,in balance. ICL respectfully submits these recommendations and comments to Staff,Parties, and the Commission.We appreciate all efforts and contributions to reach this point and welcome continued dialogue in this process. DATED this 12th Day of October,2023. Respectfully submitted, /s/Matthew A.Nykiel Matthew A.Nykiel (ISB No.10270) Attorney for Idaho Conservation League 8 IPC-E-22-22. 7 IPC-E-21-21. IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 4 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12th Day of October,2023,I delivered true and correct copies of the foregoing COMMENTS to the following persons via the method of service noted: /s/Matthew A.Nykiel Matthew A.Nykiel (ISB No.10270) Attorney for Idaho Conservation League Electronic Mail Only (See Order No.35058): Idaho Public Utilities Commission Jan Noriyuki Commission Secretary jan.noriyuki@puc.idaho.gov secretary@puc.idaho.gov Commission Staff Chris Burdin Deputy Attorney General Idaho Public Utilities Commission chris.burdin@puc.idaho.gov Idaho Power Company Lisa Nordstrom Megan Goicoechea Allen Donovan Walker lnordstrom@idahopower.com mgoicoecheaallen@idahopower.com dwalker@idahopowr.com Tim Tatum Connie Aschenbrener Grant Anderson ttatum@idahopower.com caschenbrenner@idahopower.com ganderson@idahopower.com Clean Energy Opportunities for Idaho Kelsey Jae Law for Conscious Leadership 920.N.Clover Dr. Boise ID,83703 kelsey@kelseyjae.com Mike Heckler Courtney White mike@cleanenergyopprotunites.com courtney@cleanenergyopprotunites.com IIPA Eric Olsen Echo Hawk &Olsen,PLLC P.O.Box 6119 Pocatello,ID 83205 Lance D.Kaufman,Ph.D 2623 Blue Bell Pl. Corvallis OR,97330 lance@aegisinsight.com IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 5 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments Micron Technology,Inc. Jim Swier Micron Technology,Inc. 8000 S.Federal Way Boise ID,83707 Austin Rueschhoff Thorvald Nelson Austin W.Jensen Holland &Hart,LLP darueschhoff@hollandhart.com tnelson@hollandhart.com awjensen@hollandhart.com aclee@hollandhart.com clmoser@hollandhart IdaHydro Tom Arkoosh Arkoosh Law Office 913 W.River St.,Suite 450 P.O.Box 2900 tom.arkoosh@arkoosh.com erin.cecil@arkoosh.com City of Boise Daryl Early Deputy City Attorneys Boise City Attorney’s Office 150 N.Capitol Blvd.,PO Box 500 Boise,ID 83701-0500 dearly@cityofboise.org boca@cityofboise.org Wil Gehl Boise City Dept.of Public Works wgehl@cityofboise.org Vote Solar Abigail R.Germaine Elam &Burke PA 251 E.Front St.,Suite 300 PO Box 1539 Boise,ID 83701 arg@elamburke.com Kate Bowman Vote Solar 299 S.Main St.,Suite 1300 PMB 93601 Salt Lake City,UT 84111 kbowman@votesolar.com IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,Case No.IPC-E-23-14 Page 2 Idaho Conservation League –Initial Comments