20220815Comments(31)_31.pdf

From:Debbie Browning
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Idaho Power Solar Study (IPC-E-22-22) Scheduling
Date:Friday, August 12, 2022 3:19:00 PM
We are Idaho Power customers. Although we don't fully understand decisions being made in regards to
the above solar study, we understand enough to realize that Idaho Power appears to feel threatened by
the competition of solar alternatives. My husband and I do not have solar power at our home and are not
planning to change that because of the substantial cost, but we do realize the need for people to have
other options as our world reduces it's reliance on oil and gas. It's been indicated that electricity won't be
able to handle the additional demand.
Any attempts to hinder the development, sales, or growth of the solar market needs to be clearly
explained to and understood by Idaho Power consumers. Therefore we are joining those who are
requesting public hearings.
Thank you,
Debra and Steve Browning
Meridian, ID
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Friday, August 12, 2022 3:00:05 PM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Robert Kelley
Submission Time: Aug 12 2022 2:05PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 11469 Payette Heights Road
Payette, ID 83661
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "My name is Robert Kelley. I’m an Idaho Power customer living near Payette and have a rooftop solar system on my farm equipment shed. I served on an electric utility Board
of Directors for over nine years and am familiar with the rate setting process. I am very concerned about Idaho Power's recently published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It
underestimates the value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable system benefits. This threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other entities
that benefit from distributed solar generation. I am concerned that current and future solar owners will be unfairly compensated and this will discourage the installation of customer
generation. I believe the public needs to have a voice in the PUC’s consideration of Idaho Power’s rooftop solar study. Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across
Idaho Power’s service territory. And, offer virtual video options and a weekend option to make this critical proceeding accessible to as many people as possible so they can share their
concerns directly with the Commission. Thank you for your consideration."
------
From:Debbie Browning
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Idaho Power Solar Study (IPC-E-22-22) Scheduling
Date:Friday, August 12, 2022 3:19:00 PM
We are Idaho Power customers. Although we don't fully understand decisions being made in regards to
the above solar study, we understand enough to realize that Idaho Power appears to feel threatened by
the competition of solar alternatives. My husband and I do not have solar power at our home and are not
planning to change that because of the substantial cost, but we do realize the need for people to have
other options as our world reduces it's reliance on oil and gas. It's been indicated that electricity won't be
able to handle the additional demand.
Any attempts to hinder the development, sales, or growth of the solar market needs to be clearly
explained to and understood by Idaho Power consumers. Therefore we are joining those who are
requesting public hearings.
Thank you,
Debra and Steve Browning
Meridian, ID
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Friday, August 12, 2022 5:00:06 PM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: James Flynn
Submission Time: Aug 12 2022 4:14PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 14065 Raptor Ln
Caldwell, ID 83607
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "Hi. My names is James Flynn. I moved to Caldwell from my previous home in Southern California. When I retired from the Sheriff's Department in December of 2015 and
was hoping to immediately move up to Idaho. That is because my brother and his extended family had, at that time, lived up her for many years. And during my visits I found that I loved
the Idaho culture, it was much different than the culture in California. However, due to a diagnosis of cancer I decided to stay in California with the doctors I knew until the cancer was
in remission. And I finally moved up here in December, 2020 and have been an Idaho Power customer ever since. And, over the years (I grew up in California), the California
governmental and quasi-governmental (governmental regulated) agencies have become bloated and, I believe, less responsive to the people they are paid to serve. I hope I am wrong
but, just in the short time I have lived in Idaho, I am concerned that Idaho may be starting to go the same direction. According to your website, your goal is the "clean" generation of
electrical power by 2045 I believe. As I understand, the residential solar net metering structure is very important in helping to meet that goal. Therefore, I hope you will continue to support
residential power generation, through solar panels, to help yourselves and all of us meet that 2045 goal."
------
From:Jody Mahnken ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Friday, August 12, 2022 11:55:32 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
Listen to us! Hold public hearings on Local Solar Power!!
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Jody Mahnken
4140 Oxbow Way
Boise, ID 83713
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2022 8:00:07 AM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Frank Ross
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 7:33AMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 1466 E Rimrock Ct
Boise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I would like to request a public hearing to understand Idaho Power's intent and future impact on customers producing energy via home solar installations. The current study
indicates that Idaho Power would reduce the current fair purchase rate of home-based solar generation substantially, thereby defeating the incentive for homeowners to convert to this
form of renewable energy. The study does not adequately address the benefits of a distributed, clean solar energy system created by home-based solar. I encourage the commission to solicit
more input from the public and from current (and potential) home-based renewable energy producers."
------
From:chris connolly ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2022 8:46:06 AM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
This issue goes beyond ID Power, it is also a state issue. When I personally installed rooftop solar on my home,
Idaho DBS made it super difficult during the permitting process, a Jimmy Stansel was a major roadblock. Solar
installers know who this person is and do not have a positive opinion of him. Hopefully he is no longer involved in
solar permitting.
ID Power also needs to step up and help keep solar affordable, how else are we to transition to cleaner energy??
Thanks for your time.
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
chris connolly
331 May rd
MCCALL, ID 83638
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2022 1:00:18 PM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Keith Nyeki
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 12:07PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 6868 e prosperity st
Boise, ID 83716
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "Requesting public hearing"
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2022 5:00:15 PM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Nathan Morgan
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 4:03PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 2123 East Bergeson Street
Boise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "Hello IPUC, Idaho power attempt to add unreasonable calculated avoided cost to"buy" small home onsite generation solar at a quarter to less than half of wholesale market rate
is an attempt by a monopoly to keep their stake in the production market. As Professional civilengineer for the Bureau Reclamation, one of the largest publicly funded power producing
entities in the West, I see it ridiculous that power company can lump all these "avoided cost"to target producers that make less than 0.05 percent of the entire production. It is akin to Idaho
drivers blaming bicyclist commuters on small neighborhood roads (who make up less than 3percent of the entire transportation) for congestion on the major highways and interstate.
While I completely familiar with and understand the infrastructure cost of maintaining highvoltage transformers, power lines, and other power related cost like powerplants, blaming
small 7kwh roof top solar production, is pennies in the grand scheme of production cost. Youcan not saddle every cost on one type of generation. As an engineer who inspects federal
hydro electric facilities along the Snake and Columbia rivers, I find it comical that IdahoPower and Idaho Legislatures are going after the smallest generation, when Bonneville Power
Adminstation markets there hydro production at low cost for the complete benefit of thepublic. This publicly traded power is the power (primarily from the Corp of Engineers and
Grand Coluee Dam) that Idaho Power generally buys on the market that is shared across manytimes federally (WAPA, BPA) power lines. The small solar guy living in the Treasure Valley
is not generating enough to even leave there neighborhood, so they negate the high leveltransmission "avoided cost". This study is completely flawed is only an attempt to reduce solar
generation at the benefit of Idaho Power market. It's the same reason there is on-sitegeneration caps of 25 kwh was created by the Idaho Public Utilities Commision and state
government to prevent any further small power development by small companies in rurallocations throughout southern idaho. IN A TIME when HVAC systems and electric cars are
being installed and increasing demand, and Idaho Power risk not meeting peak demand at thehighest loads in summer, I find it foolish to cap and reduce small generation. This study is a
failure of sound engineering judicious for political and monetary gains and fails to look at thelarger issue of overall generation capacity throughout the state and grid diversity. Idaho Power
"goal" to "provide 100% clean energy by 2045 builds on its long history as a clean-energyleader that provides reliable service at affordable prices" is ludicrious if they are to chop and
gut the entire market of small capacity generation by only selling (via credits) the power backto its customers at 2-3 cents per kwh is a larger market force than 'clean power'. Please reject
this study that looks to put the entire market on the backs of the smallest energy generation. Ultimately Idaho Power attempt to reduce on-site solar generation will ultimately reduce
overall production in areas like the treasure valley and raise our lowest rates in the country as demand continues to grow. Respectfully, Nathan Morgan, P.E."
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 8:00:10 AM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Joseph Gallagher
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 7:14AMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 5135 Sorrento Drive
BOISE, ID 83704
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I have been an on-site customer-generator using solar power for 3 months. Because of this, I have dramatically reduced my carbon footprint. I read the VODER Study
and believe that it is flawed in many ways. I feel that it's conclusions are misleading and could lead to a negative impact on both customer-generators and the solar power industry in general.
I strongly support the need for accessible in-person public hearings on this issue. Let's do what is right for Idaho and assure that customer-generating is treated fairly by Idaho Power. "
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 9:00:06 AM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Samantha Silva
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 8:00AMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 289 Summit Ridge Rd
Boise, ID 83702
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I'm requesting a public hearing (and a lot more transparency) about drastic changes Idaho Power is considering that will hurt owners of solar-powered homes. This is an
outrage. And we will not stand for it. You should be doing everything in YOUR power to encourage the switch to renewable energy sources, not destroying our planet more."
------
From:Kelly Loy ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 11:36:52 AM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
We installed solar to help our planet and ease strain on the local power system. The cost reduction was very helpful,
and should continue in a robust way to support sustainable energy coordinating with traditional power sources!
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Kelly Loy
426 E Indian Creek Rd
Boise , ID 83716
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 4:00:12 PM
The following comment was submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Carol Harris
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 3:07PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 418 S Pond St
Boise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "Why do you believe that changes to solar energy structure is to the homeowner's benefit ?"
------
From:Sam Eurich ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 6:46:56 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Sam Eurich
671 Con Virginia Drive
Hailey, ID 83333
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:Shari Morfin ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 1:06:19 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
Idaho Power should be moving to only clean energy now. I'm tired of sitting in smoke most of the summer every
other summer due to climate chaos. I am against proposed cuts to customer solar credits and want you to do a fair
value of solar study, not a misleading one. Even Texas knows solar is the way to go. I'll remind you that you are
supposed to serve the needs of future generations of Idahoans.
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Shari Morfin
1000 Beulah Rd
Troy, ID 83871
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:Kate Anderson ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 1:09:05 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
I paid to have solar on my house because going green to combat climate change is important. Stop lying about the
benefits of solar and stop trying to keep all the profits for your shareholders at the expense of those of us in Idaho
who have gotten solar.
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Kate Anderson
855 Partridge Drive
Mountain Home , ID 83647
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:Bradley England ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 1:22:01 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Bradley England
4491 S Axiom Ave
Boise, ID 83716
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:Bonita Vestal ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 2:21:51 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
We need local and accessible public hearings on the proposed changes to individual homeowners' credits for
generating solar power. People install rooftop solar at considerable personal expense because everyone wants to do
their part to reduce dependency on fossil fuels. Idaho Power should be partnering with motivated homeowners to
improve the future of power generation here in Idaho for our children and their children. after them. Change always
takes effort and of course, causes inconvenience while we find a better way. Let's all help one another pave the way
to a better future. Thank you!
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Bonita Vestal
1613 N. 20th St.
Boise, ID 83702
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:Vivian Parrish ([e-mail]) Sent You a Personal Message
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:IPC-E-22-22 Public Hearing Request
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 2:29:20 PM
Dear Idaho Public Utilities Commission,
Idaho Power?s study is not fair or credible and that it presents an artificially low value of solar that will prevent
residents from exercising their right to energy independence.
Slashing compensation rates to local solar owners by over 60%, making solar power less affordable for Idaho
families, businesses, farms, schools, this is not promoting clean energy for our state.
But first things first: we need equitable and accessible public hearings in multiple locations and days (including a
weekend option)! Local residents in Pocatello, Ketchum, Twin Falls, McCall, or even Ontario shouldn't have to
drive all the way to Boise to participate in a public hearing on such an important case.
I am very concerned about Idaho Power's newly published cost-benefit study on rooftop solar. It underestimates the
value of solar by intentionally excluding measurable environmental and related benefits. This impacts customer
rates and threatens fair compensation for Idaho families, businesses, farms, schools, and other local entities that
benefit from locally-owned solar.
Please hold in-person public hearings in multiple locations across Idaho Power?s service territory (and offer virtual
video options and a weekend option) to ensure as many people as possible can participate in this critical proceeding
and share their concerns directly with the Commission.
After gaining an understanding of public concerns and the technical flaws in the study, I urge you to reject Idaho
Power's study. Idahoans deserve solar rates based on a more fair, credible, comprehensive, and complete analysis.
Sincerely,
Vivian Parrish
12531 W. Murchison Street
Boise, ID 83709
[e-mail]
[phone]
This message was sent by KnowWho, as a service provider, on behalf of an individual associated with Sierra Club.
If you need more information, please contact Lillian Miller at Sierra Club at [e-mail] or (415) 977-
5500.
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 12:00:07 PM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Michal Voloshen
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 11:09AMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 5839 S. Teak Way
Boise, ID 83716
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I recently put in solar panels. Now I hear that those incentives for solar are going away. We should be doing all we can to encourage people to go solar! We have to do our part
to protect our planet! "
------
Name: Jeff TaylorSubmission Time: Aug 14 2022 11:55AM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-991-4447
Address: 3809 W Camas StBoise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "Idaho Power routines asks people to turn off their AC during peak hours, and has
a program where they can do it for you, as well. They also have a time of day plan. So Idaho Power knows about peak hours loads, and prices accordingly. This means that they know the
benefit of solar power adding back into the grid. It's pretty disingenuous for them to move towards a model that doesn't allow consumers to reap the benefit of adding to the grid. Any
rule that effectively removes or swallows all the benefit of net metering simply creates a monopoly. And that's not good for consumers, whether we have solar or not. Net metering
should be left in place. And Idaho Power should not be able to charge fees or anything that would significantly curb solar or wind. Thank you Jeff Taylor"
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Monday, August 15, 2022 7:00:07 AM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Kyle carpenter
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 5:10PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 1518 n 6th street
Boise, ID 83702
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "How does Idaho power continue to incentivize home owners to buy solar panels with this current study? It seems that after June 2023, there would be zero monetary incentive
to put solar panels on a residential dwelling as the buy back costs for the investment will never be realized. I think the rate at which Idaho Power purchases solar kilowatts Crome
homeowners should factor in some percentage to reflect the continuing incentive to move to green power sources. "
------
Name: Sara carpenter
Submission Time: Aug 14 2022 5:16PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 1518 north 6th street
Boise, ID 83702
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I am worried that this current study study from Idaho power will disincentivize customers from investing in Solar for their homes"
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Sunday, August 14, 2022 7:00:07 AM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Lyle Zufelt
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 10:35PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 9965 GRAND TARGHEE TRL
Middleton, ID 83644
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I wish I had never spent the money to install solar panels. I feel more foolishevery day as I consider the reduction in compensation for the electricity generated by the solar
panels I installed at no cost to Idaho Power. The $5.00 charge I pay every month and willcontinue to pay for the rest of my life should be more than enough to cover the cost of
transmission lines and service personnel. You might be able to take advantage of thecustomers like me who installed solar panels, but when the demand exceeds your capacity
because no one is willing to invest in a losing proposition (which is what solar panels will be)you will have yourselves to blame."
------
Name: Michael Morris
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 8:50PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 2665 N Cliffview Pl
Boise, ID 83702
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I have heard through social media that Idaho Power wants to decreasecompensation for homeowners who have solar. If this is the case, there needs to be a public
hearing. In the setting of climate change and the increased need to convert to green energy, weshould not be penalizing citizens who invest in green energy. On the contrary, this needs to be
encouraged for the betterment of all. To decrease the incentive to invest in solar goes againsteverything we should be working toward. Respectfully, Mike Morris "
------
Name: Marta Sparhawk
Submission Time: Aug 13 2022 10:17PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 623 w. Elwood
Boise, ID 83706
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "We want to REQUEST A PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT case number "IPC-E-22-22";. Please leave the credit system the way it is. We are not interested in cash payouts, which
might not be very fair to solar homeowners. thank you"
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Saturday, August 13, 2022 7:00:10 AM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Liza Rachetto
Submission Time: Aug 12 2022 9:23PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 411 N. Hillview Dr
Boise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "REQUEST A PUBLIC HEARING ABOUT case number "IPC-E-22-22""
------
Name: Ronald MarquartSubmission Time: Aug 12 2022 5:25PM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-344-4012
Address: 3300 E. Red Stone DriveBoise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Public Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "We have enjoyed rooftop solar and the credits for the last several years. We
understand that the power company now wishes to pay for the extra power they get from usinstead of giving us the credits. The credits are much more valuable than the proposed
payments--we should be encouraging solar power--not discouraging it!!! "
------
Name: Carol KlugSubmission Time: Aug 12 2022 8:35PM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-631-3362
Address: 520 n 1st st wHomedale, ID 83628
Name of Utility Company: Idaho power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I'm very concerned that idaho power is not letting the public have a public
forum/discussion to talk about solar impact and usage in idaho . I am concerned they arebiased against businesses and residential customers who have solar and contribute power to
our state. The economic impact is significant and I would like to know there is moreconsideration for everything involved with how we solar contributors impact t idaho power
and the green direction for clean power we should all be striving for. "
------
Name: Carolyn ChandlerSubmission Time: Aug 12 2022 8:20PM
Email: [e-mail]: 404-293-4038
Address: 214 S Straughan AveBoise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "I am urging the IPUC to hold public hearings regarding the ANY and ALL
changes to Idaho Power’s solar cost sharing/benefit program. The logic Idaho Power used inits study and resulting program changes appears to be flawed. Since Idaho customers do not
have the option to change power companies, it is the IPUC duty to allow public hearings onsuch a monumental decision. Thank you, Carolyn "
------
Name: Kenneth Wiley
Submission Time: Aug 12 2022 8:03PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 3309 E Rivernest Lane
Boise, ID 83706
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Case ID: IPC-E-22-22
Comment: "As one who invested in on-site power generation and given the monopoly IdahoPower enjoys I have no alternative but to sell excess power to Idaho Power. The excess power
I sell should be purchased at the same rate I purchase from Idaho Power. By my investment inpower generation I've enabled Idaho Power to avoid additional power generation investments
and leverage a "green" source of power. If Idaho Power prioritized its customer's interests firstit would provide an incentive for more customers to invest. Think of all the available roofs
within Idaho Power's service area that could be generating power, every day. It wouldwonderful if case IPC-E-22-22 could be summarized, in plain english, without industry jargon,
so that those who are not public utility experts can understand the intent of the study, itsfindings, recommendations and outcomes. There are more TLA's used than I've encountered
any where. Thank you"