Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201120Decision Memo.pdfDSCISION MEMORANDUM TO COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER RAPER COMMISSIONER ANDERSON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM:JOHN R. HAMMOND JR. DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: NOVEMBER 20,2020 SUBJECT:IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION OF AN ENERGY SALES AGREEMANT WITH THE CITY OF POCATELLO; CASE NO. IPC-E-20- 37. On November 12, 2070.ldaho Power Cornpany ("ldaho Power" or "Company") filed an Application seeking approval of its proposed Energy Sales Agreement ("ESA") with the Cify of Pocatello. Idaho ("Pocatello" or "Seller") Ibr the energy generated by the Pocatello Waste Project ("Facility"). The Facility is a qualilying facility ("QF") under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act o1'1978 ("PURPA"). THE APPLICATION The Facility operated by Pocatello has a 500 kilowatt ("kW") nameplate capacity. The Facility has two Caterpillar motors operated by methane gas from the Pocatello Wastewater Treatment Plant. Application at 4. ldaho Power asserts these motors have powered a 500 kW generator since 199311994. The Facility currently delivers energy to the Company under an energy sales agreement dated April 24. 1985. Id.The existins enerqv sal aqreernent exoires on December 31.2020. Id. TIie Company and Pocatello intend the proposed ESA to replace the expiring energy sales agreement. Id. al2. The Companl, states the proposed ESA complies with Cornrnission orders regarding this type of agreemenl.. Id. In the proposed ESA, Pocatello has contracted fbr non-levelized, "Other" published avoided cost rates for a 20-year tenrl. ld. at 41. see Order No. 34683. Idaho Power states that because this is a replacement ESA. the proposed ESA contains capacity payments for the entire DECISION MEMORANDUM term of the Agreement. Id. at 5. The Company requests that its Application be processed by Modified Procedure. Id. at8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission issue a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure. Staff recommends the Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure provide for a twenty-one (21) day written comment period for itself and any other interested parties, with a seven (7) day reply comment period for the Company to follow. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to issue a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure that establishes a twenty-one (21) day written comment period for Staff and any other interested parties followed by a seven (7) day reply comment period for the Company? Hammond Jr. Attomey General I \Lcgal\ELECTRICUPC-E-20178UPC8:037-dc mcmojrh dc 2DECISION MEMORANDUM