Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190624Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER RAPER COMMISSIONER ANDERSON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF FROM:EDWARD J. JEWELL DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: JUNE 24,2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY TO STUDY FIXED COSTS OF PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE TO CUSTOMERS, CASE NO. IPC-E.I8.16. On November 9, 2018, the Commission set a November 30,2018 intervention deadline for this case. Order No. 34190. On April 5,2019,ldaho Power filed IPC-E-19-15, which will examine the terms and compensation structure for commercial, industrial, and inigation customers with net metering systems under Schedule 84. On June 14, 2019, Russell Schiermeier filed a late petition to intervene in this proceeding and a late petition to intervene in IPC-E- I 8- 1 6. The rules for late petitions to intervene, and the late petition filed by ICIP, are summarized below. RULES GOVERNING LATE PETITIONS TO INTERVENE Commission Rules provide that a petitioner seeking intervention must state its "direct and substantial interest. . . in the proceeding." IDAPA 31.01.01 .072. Petrtions to intervene that are not timely filed "must state a substantial reason for delay." IDAPA 31.01.01.073. "The Commission may deny or conditionally grant petitions to intervene that are not timely filed for failure to state good cause for untimely filing, to prevent disruption, prejudice to existing parties or undue broadening of the issues, or for other reasons." Id. Also, "Intervenors who do not file timely petitions are bound by orders and notices earlier entered as a condition of granting the untimely petition." 1d. RUSSELL SCHIERMEIER'S PETITION Russell Schiermeier states that he owns and operates farming operations in Owyhee County, Idaho, which currently host several net metering systems and potential net metering sites. DECISION MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: 1 Petition to Intervene at I . Mr. Schiermeier timely filed a petition to intervene in IPC-E- I 9- I 5 and concurrent to this petition hled a petition to intervene in IPC-E- 1 8- I 5. Mr. Schiermeier states that the overlap in dockets IPC-E-18-15, IPC-E-18-16, and IPC-E-19-15 necessitates intervention and participation in all three dockets. Mr. Schiermeier states that granting him intervention will not disrupt the proceedings, prejudice existing parties, nor unduly broaden the issues. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to grant Russell Schiermeier's petition to intervene? err2 Edward J. J Deputy General I :\Legal\ELECTRIC\lPC-E- I 8- I 6\lr4emos\IPCE I 8 I 6_ej3 2DECISION MEMORANDUM