Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180810Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER RAPER COMMISSIONER ANDERSON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF FROM:EDWARD JEWELL DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: AUGUST 10,2018 SUBJECT:MOTION TO STAY DEADLINES IN THE PETITION OF IDAHYDRO, sHoRocK HYDRO, INC., J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, AND RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION FOR MODIFICATION OF THE 9Ol110 PERFORMANCE BAND AND CALCULATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHARGES FOR PURPA QUALIFYING FACILITIES, CASE NO. IPC.E.18.O7. On April 16,2018, Idahydro, Shorock Hydro, Inc., the J.R. Simplot Company, and the Renewable Energy Coalition jointly petitioned the Commission to modiff, amend, or stay existing orders or rules, and to clarify rights and obligations implementing Section 210 of the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978 ("PURPA"), l6 U.S.C. $824a-3 et seq. Specifically, Petitioners asked the Commission to revisit the 90/l l0 performance band for non-wind Qualifying Facilities ("QFs"). Petitioners also asked the Commission to modify how Idaho Power calculates the Operations & Maintenance ("O&M") charges that QFs pay to interconnect their facilities with Idaho Power under Schedule '72, as approved in Order No. 24025, so Idaho Power only can charge a QF for the actual O&M costs that Idaho Power incurs to interconnect with that QF's facilities. The Commission issued a Notice of Petition and Notice of Intervention Deadline on May 8,2018, and an Amended Notice of Petition and Notice of Intervention Deadline on May 30, 2018, requiring that after the Notice of Parties issued, Commission Staff shall confer with the parties regarding a procedural schedule for this matter. Tamarack Energy Partnership and Avista Corp. intervened. The parties have engaged in several rounds of discovery since the filing of the initial petition. No procedural schedule has been established yet in this proceeding. As the Commission directed in the Amended Notice of Petition, Staff and the parties met and conferred regarding structuring and scheduling. Before a scheduling agreement could be 1DECISION MEMORANDUM reached, Idaho Power announced that it would be filing a cross-petition. The parties thus agreed to suspend discussions until they had a chance to review the cross-petition. Idaho Power filed its cross-petition on July 25, 2018. J.R. Simplot Co. then filed an Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings with the IPUC on August 8,2018 that asked "the Commission [to] issue an order staying all pending deadlines and proceedings in this matter for 28 days or until such time before 28 days that any party moves to lift the stay, and tolling pending deadlines beginning on the date of this filing." COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to grant the Petitioner's Motion and (l) stay all proceedings for 28 days from the date of the Commission's Order in this matter, or until the Commission grants a party's motion to lift the stay; and (2) toll all deadlines for 28 days from the date of the Commission's Order in this matter? *4*/(@ Deputy Attorney General I \Legal\ELECTRIC\lPC-E-l 8-07\McmosUPCEl E07_dec memo_deadline_ej 2DECISION MEMORANDUM