Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171019Motion in Opposition.pdf3Iffi*. An IDACORP Company DONOVAN E. WALKER Lead Counsel dwalker@idahopower.com October 19,2017 VIA HAND DELIVERY Diane M. Hanian, Secretary !daho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street Boise, ldaho 83702 c.; l Re Case No. IPC-E-17-14 Shorock Hydro, lnc. - Rock Creek 1 Hydro Project ldaho Power Company's Motion in Opposition to Renewable Energy Coalition's Petition to Intervene Dear Ms. Hanian: Enclosed for filing in the above matter please find an original and seven (7) copies of ldaho Power Company's Motion in Opposition to Renewable Energy Coalition's Petition to lntervene. Ve ly yours, r Donovan E. Walker DEW:csb Enclosures 1221 W. ldaho St. (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, lD 83707 DONOVAN E. WALKER (lSB No. 5921) ldaho Power Company 1221West ldaho Street (83702) P.O. Box 70 Boise, ldaho 83707 Telephone: (208) 388-5317 Facsimile: (208) 388-6936 dwalker@ idahopower. com Attorney for ldaho Power Company BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION *j ,-1 L.i:l ;-;l -r:t ia.) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF IDAHO POWER TO APPROVE OR REJECT lTS ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT WITH SHOROCK HYDRO, INC., FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FROM THE ROCK CREEK 1 HYDRO PROJECT CASE NO. IPC-E-17.14 IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOT]ON IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Power" or "Company"), pursuant to RP 75, hereby moves the ldaho Public Utilities Commission ("Commission") to issue an order denying the Petition to lntervene filed by the Renewable Energy Coalition ('REC") in this proceeding. ln support of this Motion, ldaho Power states as follows: 1. On October 12, 2017, REC filed a Petition to lntervene in Case No. !PC-E-17-14. ldaho Power hereby objects to the intervention of REC in the present case, which asks for a Commission determination either approving or rejecting Shorock Hydro, lnc.'s ("Shorock Hydro") contract with ldaho Power. This objection is filed IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE - 1 pursuant to Rule 75, which states, "Any party opposing a petition to intervene must do so by motion in opposition filed within seven (7) days after receipt of the petition to intervene...." 2. REC's Petition should be denied because (1) it is not appropriate for REC to advocate its own issues in the context of the Commission's approval or rejection of a contract between two other parties, (2) REC has other appropriate opportunities and procedures before this Commission with which to address its own issues, and (3) REC's involvement with this case will cause additional and detrimental delay, as well as unnecessary confusion of the issues. 3. None of REC's members currently have a contract either pending review and approval before the Commission, nor in negotiations with ldaho Power, that implicates issues related to 9Oo/ol11Oo/o and operations and maintenance ("O&M") fees. Counsel for REC has informed ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro that REC intends to conduct discovery and to possibly request a technical hearing and present witness testimony. REC would not agree to accept the procedural schedule set forth by the Commission, with a comment deadline of October 31, 2017, reply deadline of November 21, 2017 , and sur-reply deadline of December 5, 2017 , as directed in Order No. 33912 (October 12,2017). 4. On October 16, 2017,ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro filed a Stipulated Motion with the Commission, asking the Commission to bifurcate the approval of the Energy Sales Agreement ("ESA") from its determination of the 90%/110o/o and O&M issues. ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro asked that the procedural schedule from Order No. 33912 be vacated and that the Commission approve the submitted ESA with a 21-day, Modified Procedure comment deadline. ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE - 2 additionally stipulated that Shorock Hydro, either individually or in conjunction with other interested parties, will subsequently file either an application or complaint with the Commission to raise and argue objection to the 9Oo/o1110% and O&M issues. ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro asked that those related provisions from Shorock Hydro's ESA be governed by the Commission's ultimate determination from such subsequent proceedings. The Stipulated Motion is on the agenda for the Commission's decision meeting on October 19,2017, the same day this Motion in Opposition to REC's Petition to lntervene is due. Commission Staff has no objection to the Stipulated Motion and recommends the 21-day, Modified Procedure comment period, with a 14-day reply. Should the Commission approve the Stipulated Motion, REC's intervention in this contract case proceeding should be denied as REC will have the subsequent proceeding with which to weigh in on its interests/concerns regarding 9Oo/ol110o/o and O&M issues. 5. REC has other more appropriate forums before the Commission with which to address any issues it may have with its members' Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA') contracts. As stated above, any particular interest in 90o/ol110o/o and O&M issues is more appropriately addressed in a subsequent proceeding initiated by Shorock Hydro, REC, or any other party that either seeks a change to the Commission's implementation of PURPA (by petition or application) or alleges ldaho Power is not properly applying the same to their proposed or existing Qualifying Facility ("QF') (by complaint). Additionally, should any member QF of REC request a PURPA contract with ldaho Power, such contract would have its own proceeding before this Commission for the approval or rejection of its terms, conditions, and pricing. lt is not appropriate, however, for REC to advocate its own issues in the IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE - 3 context of the Commission's approval or rejection of a contract between two other parties, ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro. REC has other more appropriate avenues to raise and address issues affecting its members rather than the proceeding specific to Shorock Hydro's contract. 6. Lastly, REC's involvement in Shorock Hydro's contract review case will cause unnecessary delay to the process. Given ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro's Stipulated Motion, if approved by the Commission, the only remaining issue is whether the Commission will approve a published rate, standard PURPA contract between ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro, which is of no relevance to REC. Shorock Hydro's project, Rock Creek 1 Hydro, is an existing project with a previously approved 3S-year contract that runs its term and expires on January 15, 2018. REC has represented to ldaho Power and Shorock Hydro that it intends to seek discovery as well as a possible technical hearing, and would not agree to a modified procedure process that would conclude prior to the end of 2017. As such, the proposed intervention will result in delay to the proceedings, which has potentially detrimental consequences for Shorock Hydro should the proposed ESA not be approved prior to January 15,2018, when its existing contract terminates. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, ldaho Power respectfully requests that the Commission issue an order denying the Renewable Energy Coalition's Petition to lntervene in this matter. Respectfully submitted at Boise, ldaho, this 19th day of October 2017. D R Attorney for ldaho Power Company IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE - 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 19th day of October 2017 ! served a true and correct copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION lN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following: Commission Staff Daphne Huang Deputy Attorney General ldaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington (83702) P.O. Box 83720 Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4 Shorock Hydro, lnc. C. Tom Arkoosh ARKOOSH LAW OFFICES 802 West Bannock Street, Suite 900 P.O. Box 2900 Boise, ldaho 83701 Renewable Energy Coalition Gregory M. Adams Peter J. Richardson RICHARDSON ADAMS, PLLC 515 North 27th Street Boise, ldaho 83702 X Hand Delivered U.S. Mail Overnight Mail FAX x Email daphne.huanq puc.idaho.qov _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email tom.arkoosh@arkoosh.com _Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail _Overnight Mail _FAXX Email qreq@richardsonadams.com peter@ richa rdsonadams. com Christa Bearry, IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO RENEWABLE ENERGY COALITION'S PETITION TO INTERVENE - 5