Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20171218Comments_3.pdfDiane Holt From:dale@life-savings.com Sent:Sunday,December 17,2017 9:32 AMTo:BeverlyBarker;Diane Holt;Matthew Evans Subject:Case Comment Form:Dale Ewersen Name:Dale Ewersen Case Number:IPC-E-16-32 Email:dale@life-savings.com Telephone:208-788-0148 Address:PO Box 24,517 Chestnut Street Bellevue ID,83313 Name of Utility Company:Idaho Power Company Comment:Please accept the re-licensing agreement and settlement amount of approximately $216.5 million.The HellsCanyonComplexiscriticaltoIdaho's economic future and sustainable growth.Thank you. Unique Identifier:174.208.23.141 1 Diane Holt From:brian.alex.ray@gmail.com Sent:Sunday,December 17,2017 4:41 PMTo:BeverlyBarker;Diane Holt;Matthew EvansSubject:Case Comment Form:Brian Ray Name:Brian Ray Case Number:IPC-E-16-32 Email:brian.alex.ray@gmail.com Telephone: Address:410 Knights Rd McCall ID,83638 Name of Utility Company:Idaho Power Comment:I do not believe that passing on the costs of Hells Canyon Complex FERC relicensing to consumers isappropriate.The excess costs are due to Idaho Power Company's inabilityto maintain clean water standards,therebydrawingouttherelicensingprocess,and as such were not 'prudentlyincurred.'Adhering to environmental standards,i.e.protecting the balance between developmental and non-developmental resources,is important when privatecompaniesareutilizingandaffectingpublicresources,and consumers should not have to pay more for their neglect.The Idaho Power Company was aware of environmental regulations when it chose to relicense the Hells CanyonComplex,and thus should bear the costs of compliance. Unique Identifier:74.38.33.160 1 Diane Holt From:brian.alex.ray@gmail.comSent:Sunday,December 17,2017 4:41 PMTo:BeverlyBarker;Diane Holt;Matthew EvansSubject:Case Comment Form:Brian Ray Name:Brian Ray Case Number:IPC-E-16-32 Email:brian.alex.ray@gmail.com Telephone: Address:410 Knights Rd McCall ID,83638 Name of Utility Company:Idaho Power Comment:I do not believe that passing on the costs of Hells CanyonComplex FERC relicensing to consumers isappropriate.The excess costs are due to Idaho Power Company's inabilityto maintain clean water standards,therebydrawingouttherelicensingprocess,and as such were not 'prudentlyincurred.'Adhering to environmental standards,i.e.protecting the balance between developmental and non-developmental resources,is important when privatecompaniesareutilizingandaffectingpublicresources,and consumers should not have to pay more for their neglect.The Idaho Power Company was aware of environmental regulations when it chose to relicense the Hells CanyonComplex,and thus should bear the costs of compliance. Unique Identifier:74.38.33.160 1 Diane Holt From:dale@life-savings.com Sent:Sunday,December 17,2017 9:32 AMTo:BeverlyBarker;Diane Holt;Matthew EvansSubject:Case Comment Form:Dale Ewersen Name:Dale Ewersen Case Number:IPC-E-16-32 Email:dale@life-savings.com Telephone:208-788-0148 Address:PO Box 24,517 Chestnut Street Bellevue ID,83313 Name of Utility Company:Idaho Power Company Comment:Please accept the re-licensing agreement and settlement amount of approximately $216.5 million.The HellsCanyonComplexiscriticaltoIdaho's economic future and sustainable growth.Thank you. Unique Identifier:174.208.23.141 1