HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160524Reply Comments.pdfSIm**
An IDACORP ComDanvRECEIVED
i0l6 FIAY 23 PH h: 57
LISA D. NORDSTROIi
Lead couneel In i:)-',ii..: !l-,'dllc
rnordstrom@idahopower.com :'' i:-i;-ii c0f'{lr''ltssloN
May 23,2016
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Re: Case No. IPC-E-16-08
2016-2017 Power Cost Adjustment - ldaho Power Company's Reply
Comments
Dear Ms. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing in the above matter please find an origina! and seven (7) copies
of ldaho Power Company's Reply Comments.
Very truly yours,
-2dY*efl^P+r-t"*Lisa D. Nordstrori
LDN:csb
Enclosures
1221 W. ldaho 5t. (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, lD 83707
LISA D. NORDSTROM (lSB No. 5733)
Idaho Power Company
1221West ldaho Street (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: (208) 388-5825
Facsimile: (208) 388-6936
I n o rd strom @ ida hopowe r. com
Attorney for ldaho Power Company
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT POWER
COST ADJUSTMENT (PCA) RATES FOR
ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM JUNE 1,2016
THROUGH MAY 31,2017
iTHTIIVf;D
l$i6l-{*,Y 23 Pil l+: 57
t:: .., li:r ijr.-l l;"1','';lri,ii.ilSStOi'l
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CASE NO. IPC-E-16-08
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S
REPLY COMMENTS
ldaho Power Company ("ldaho Power" or "Company") respectfully submits the
following Reply Comments in response to comments filed by the Idaho Public Utilities
Commission ("Commission") Staff ("Staff') and the lndustrial Customers of Idaho Power
("|CIP") on May 19, 2016. ln these Reply Comments, ldaho Power concurs with Staffs
conclusion that the proposed Power Cost Adjustment ('PCA') rates should be approved
as filed, and explains why the adjustment to the PCA forecast proposed by ICIP is not
necessary.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 15, 2016, ldaho Power applied to the Commission for an order
approving an update to Schedule 55 based on the quantification of the 2016-2017 PCA
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS - 1
to become effective June 1,2016, for the period June 1,2016, through May 31 ,2017. lf
approved, the 2016-2017 PCA will result in an overal! revenue increase of
approximately $17.3 million, or a 1.57 percent increase over current billed revenue.
On May 19, 2016, Staff filed comments in this case detailing its audit of the
Company's filing, resulting in Staffs conclusion that "the Company complied with past
Commission orders and accurately calculated all proposed PCA components." Staff
Comments at 4. ln closing, Staff recommended that the Commission approve the
Company's proposed revenue sharing amounts, demand-side management transfer
amounts, and Schedule 55 rates as filed in Attachment 1 to the Company's Application.
Staff also recommended that, in future PCA cases, the Company include in its filing all
attachments, exhibits, and workpapers in electronic format with all formulae intact. Staff
Comments at 19.
Also on May 19,2016, lClP filed comments in this case recommending thatthe
Company account for the reported termination of the Energy Sales Agreement ('ESA')
between ldaho Power and Pocatello Solar 1, LLC ("Pocatello Solar") in rates proposed
to become effective June 1,2016.lClP Comments at 2.
II. IDAHO POWER'S REPLY
ldaho Power acknowledges Staff's review and agrees with Staffs conclusion that
the filed PCA components appropriately calculate 2016-2017 PCA rates under the
currently approved methodology. ldaho Power also supports Staff's recommendation
that the Company include all attachments, exhibits, and workpapers in electronic format
with all formulae intact in the filing of future PCA cases.
With respect to ICIP's recommendation, the Company maintains that the March
31, 2016, Operating Plan ("March Op PIan") is the appropriate basis for the 2016-2017
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS - 2
PCA forecast, and should not be modified to remove the Pocatello Solar project. While
ldaho Power can confirm the media reports are accurate and the Pocatello Solar project
officially terminated as of early May, for reasons stated below, the Company does not
believe it is necessary to incorporate any change to the filed PCA forecast.
The March Op Plan reflects the most current forecast information available at the
time the PCA is filed, beginning with the first month in the April through March PCA
forecast year. Given the forecast time period and the annual mid-April filing date, the
March Op Plan serves as the most current information available for the PCA forecast
included in the Company's annual PCA filings.
The True-Up is the appropriate component of the PCA to track differences
between actual and forecast net power supply expenses ("NPSE"). Throughout the
PCA forecast year of April through March, when actual NPSE deviate from the forecast
contained in the March Op Plan, the deviations are tracked through the True-Up
component of the PCA and passed through to customers in the following year's PCA
rate. To the extent that expenses resulting from Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978 ("PURPA") contracts deviate from actuals, 100 percent of the variance is passed
through to customers in the next year's PCA rate.
On page 6 of its Comments, Staff acknowledges that the Company's forecasted
PURPA expenses are appropriate, and that any deviations between forecast and
actuals will be trued-up in the following PCA. ldaho Power concurs with Staffs
conclusion.
Lastly, the modification suggested by lClP represents the singling out of one
known variable that has changed since the completion of the March Op Plan, ignoring
all other changes that have occurred since that time. lt is important to note that if the
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS - 3
PCA forecast was to be updated following the initial filing date, it would be appropriate
to update for all known changes since the development of the March Op Plan. The
result of this comprehensive update could be a rate increase or decrease relative to the
filed request, depending on the entirety of changes that occurred since the filed PCA
forecast was developed.
m. coNcLUSroN
ldaho Power acknowledges Staffs review and confirmation of its filed PCA
components and maintains that the figures comprising its filing appropriately reflect the
existing PCA methodology. ldaho Power also expresses its support for Staffs
recommendation to include functioning electronic attachments, exhibits, and
workpapers in future PCA filings.
ldaho Power disagrees with lClP's proposed modification to the PCA forecast for
the reasons set forth above. As the Company states in these Reply Comments and
Staff noted in its Comments, any deviations between actual and forecast PURPA
expenses will be captured in the True-Up as intended. Therefore, the proposed
adjustment to the filed forecast is unwarranted, unnecessary, and should be rejected.
For these reasons, ldaho Power respectfully requests that the Commission
approve the 2016-2017 PCA rates as filed in this proceeding.
DATED at Boise, ldaho, this 23'd day of May 2016.
Attorney for Idaho Power Company
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS -4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 23d day of May 2016 I served a true and correct
copy of IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS upon the following named
parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
Gommission Staff
Brandon Karpen
Deputy Attorney General
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
472 West Washington (83702)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
lndustrial Customers of ldaho Power
Peter J. Richardson
Gregory M. Adams
RICHARDSON ADAMS, PLLC
515 North 27th Street (83702)
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, ldaho 83707
Dr. Don Reading
6070 Hill Road
Boise, ldaho 83703
X Hand Delivered
_U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAXX Email brandon.karpen@puc.idaho.qov
Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mai!
Overnight Mail
FAX
Emai! peter@richardsonadams. com
o req@ richardsonadams. com
Hand DeliveredX U.S. Mail
_Overnight Mail
_FAXX Email dreadinq@mindspring.com
IDAHO POWER COMPANY'S REPLY COMMENTS.5