HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140514Allphin DI.pdfR*CIElVBS
t0llr tttY 13 Plt lrt lr2
urnffieHml8sroN
BEEORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER
COMPANY'S PETITION TO TEMPORARILY
SUSPEND ITS PURPA OBLIGATION TO
PURCHASE ENERGY GENERATED BY
SOLAR-POWERED QUALI FYING
FACTLTTTES ('QF").
cAsE NO. rPC-E-14-09
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
DIRECT TESTIMONY
OF
RANDY ALLPHIN
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
t2
13
L4
15
16
L1
1_8
1_9
20
21,
22
23
24
25
O. Pl-ease state your name and business address.
A. My name is Randy Allphin. My busj-ness address
is l22l West Idaho Street, Boise, Idaho 83702.
O. By whom are you employed and in what capacity?
A. I am employed by Idaho Power Company ("Idaho
Power" or "Company") as Energy Contracts Coordinator
Leader.
0.Please describe your educational background
and work experience wj-th fdaho Power.
A.I graduated in 7982 from Boise State
Universj-ty with a Bachel-ors of Business Administration. In
June 1982, I accepted a posj-tion as a Customer Service
Specialist with fdaho Power. In 1-986, I accepted a
position as an Operations Accountant in the Operatj-ons and
Fuels Management accounting group. My specific
responsibilities were accounting for and performing
economic analyses of the Company's agreements with
Qualifying Eacilj-ties ("QF"), as well as fuels accounting
and thermal operations and maintenance accounting. In
1998, in addition to the responsibility of performing the
accounting and economic analysis of QF agreements, I was
also assigned the responsibility of administering all
aspects of existing and new QF agreements as the Co-
generatj-on and Small Power Production ("CSPP") Contract
Administrator. In 2070, I was promoted to Senior Energy
ALLPHIN, DI 1
Idaho Power Company
1 Contracts Administrator and was assi-gned two direct reports
2 to manage the large number of Idaho Power QE and other
3 renewable energy agreements. I have been j-nvolved with
4 accountj-ng, economic analysis, contract administration, and
5 contract negotiations of ldaho Power QF and renewable
6 energy agreements for approximately 26 years. In addition,
7 I was responsible for the initial implementation of Idaho
I Power's Oregon Solar Photovoltaic (\\PV") Pilot Program and
9 currently am assigned supervisory oversight of the
10 administratj-on of that program.
1t_O. What is the purpose of your testimony in this
72 matter?
13 A. The purpose of my testimony is to provide a
14 summary of the current status of contracts, requests for
15 contracts, i-nquiries, pricing requests, etc., related to
l-6 Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 ("PURPA")
L7 solar power purchase agreements/obligations with Idaho
1-8 Power.
79 O. Have you prepared any exhibits with your
20 testimony?
2L A. Yes. I have prepared Exhibit No. 1 to my
22 testimony that summarizes the information from my
23 testimony.
24
25
ALLPHIN, DI 2
Idaho Power Company
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I
9
10
11
72
13
74
15
1,6
1.7
18
79
20
2t
22
23
24
25
proj ects
Power?
What is the current status of solar QF
that have inquired about power sales to Idaho
A. Idaho Power, ds of May L2, 2074, has 31
individual solar QF projects with a total nameplate rating
of 501 megawatts (\\MW") attempting to get power purchase
agreements and/or obligations pursuant to PURPA. Of this
501 MW, 15 projects for 341 MW are l-ocated withj-n Idaho
with the remainingT 16 projects for 160 MW being in Oregon.
Six of the Oregon projects (60 MW total) have fu1Iy
executed power purchase agreements with Idaho Power.
Currently, none of these contracts or potential
contracts/obligati-ons incl-ude any reductions related to
solar integration costs, and thus customers will pay more
than the Company's avoj-ded cost for the energy from these
sol-ar QF projects if contracts/obligatj-ons are obtained or
incurred by these solar QFs.
0.How many QE projects does Idaho Power
currently have under contract?
A.As of May 13, 2074, Idaho Power has ]-1"7 PURPA
of approximately 883contracts for a total- namepJ-ate rating
MW.
0. What is the approximate cost,/obligation
associated with the currentl-y exlsting 883 MW of PURPA
contracts that Idaho Power has?
ALLPHIN, DI 3
Idaho Power Company
1 A. As of April t, 2074, all currentl-y existing
2 contracted PURPA projects with fdaho Power have an
3 estimated cost of approximately $2.835 bilIion.
4 Q. Have you approxj-mated the cost/obli-gations of
5 the 501 MW of potential solar QF contracts/obligations to
6 Idaho Power and its customers?
1 A. Yes. At current avoided cost rates applicable
I in each jurisdiction, and using the estimated generation
9 profil-es from the various proposed projects, this 501 MW
10 represents a cost of approximately $1,888,716,510 to Idaho
11 Power customers over the life of those contracts. The
12 proposed solar QF projects represent 2/3 of all of Idaho
13 Power's existing PURPA QF contract costs/obligations
74 j-ncurred to date. They also constitute an increase in the
15 total nameplate rating of Idaho Power's QF projects from
16 883 MW to nearly 1,400 MW. Idaho Power's minimum load on
L1 its entire system for 2OL3 was 1,005 MW.
18 Although the sol-ar integratj-on study has not yet
19 identified a cost, assuming a cost equal to that of wind
20 integration at $6.50, the potential integration costs
2L associated with the 501 MW of sol-ar is approximateJ-y
22 $146,181,685. This suggests that customers might be
23 required to overpay developers by 8 percent. These numbers
24 are all reported on a cumul-ative as well as individual
25 project basis in my Exhibit No. 1.
ALLPH]N, DI 4
Idaho Power Company
O. Can you further describe the nature of the 501
2 MW of sol-ar QF projects that are proposed for Idaho Power's
3 system?
A. Yes. Based upon my many years of experj-ence
5 administering the PURPA contracts and process at Idaho
6 Power, the 501 MW of solar QF projects are very real- and
7 imminent. Knowing many of the developers that are coming
8 forward with proposed projects, they are the type and kind
9 of developers that I consi-der to be serious developers,
10 with real- projects, and not just "tire-kj-ckers."
11 In Oregon, one developer has proposed a total of 16
12 different solar QF projects, all at 10 MW each in order to
13 obtain Oregon standard contract rates. Of these 160 MVi of
1,4 proposed projects in Oregon, Idaho Power has recently
15 executed six contracts at 10 MW of nameplate capacity each,
L6 none of which contain solar integration costs.
Ll In its Idaho jurisdiction, the Company has 341 MW of
18 serious inqui-ries from six developers representing 15
19 different solar QF projects. Idaho Power has provi-ded
20 indicative incremental cost Integrated Resource Plan
21- pricing to six separate sol-ar QF projects, consisting of
22 five 20 MW projects and one 40 MW project for a total of
23 140 MW. Four of these projects have requested and received
24 draft contracts from Idaho Power, and are in active
25 discussions/negotiations about contract terms and
ALLPHIN, DI 5
ldaho Power Company
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
B
9
10
11
t2
13
L4
15
t6
71
1B
L9
20
2t
22
23
24
25
conditions. One developer is seeking contracts for a 40 MW
and two 20 MW solar QF projects to be l-ocated on land under
the control of three large Idaho municipalities. The most
recent inquiry is from a developer that over the years has
proposed various QF projects and has enlisted the aid of a
successful- wind developer in devefoping four 30 MW sol-ar
projects and is seeking contracts/obligations with Idaho
Power. Another developer is a large out-of-state wind
developer that is now proposing a 20 MW solar QE project on
the site of a formerly proposed wi-nd QF project.
At least five other 20 MW each solar QF projects are
represented by experienced Idaho lega1 counsel that has
represented numerous QF projects of al-1 generation types
over the course of many years. These projects, while the
Petition was being drafted, took an outdated draft contract
from a different sol-ar QE project, reproduced it five
times, and signed the non-fj-na1, non-agreed to, and
superseded document and delivered it to Idaho Power on May
12, 20L4. Along with its submission, these five QFs
incl-uded a cover letter purporting to establ-ish 1ega11y
enforceabl-e obligations by such actions. This confirms the
immediacy of the situation. In reference to the QE
projects mentioned above, dt approximately 3:00 p.m., Idaho
Power sent e-maiI correspondence along with updated and
superseding draft contracts contaj-ning a solar integration
ALLPHIN, DI 6
Idaho Power Company
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
t2
13
L4
15
1,6
t7
18
19
20
2L
22
23
24
25
charge to the four solar QF projects who had prevj-ously
received draft contracts. Just minutes later, dt
approximately 3:05 p.m., ds mentioned above, Idaho Power
took delivery of a dupllcated draft contract, duplicated
from a previously provided contract for a different solar
QE project, for five proposed 20 MW solar QF projects,
signed by the QF purporting to be a 1egal1y enforceable
obligation binding customers.
O. Do you have any other indications of the
i-mminent nature of these 501- MW of proposed solar QF
proj ects ?
A.Yes. Idaho Power has seen steady, but a
rel-atively Iow vol-ume, of solar QE activity for a number of
years. However, since the completion of the GNR-E-11-03,
or Phase III of the comprehensive PURPA case at the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission, the Company has seen increased
interest in solar QF project development.
Activity, J-nquiries, and communications from
proposed sol-ar QE projects have recently increased
substantially following Idaho Power's May 7, 2074, solar
integrati-on public workshop. It is believed that all of
the solar QF developers are well aware of the status and
progress of ldaho Power's solar j-ntegration study-including
the fact that the Company antici-pates results from the
solar integration study in the near future, ds early as
ALLPHIN, DI 7
Idaho Power Company
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
L4
15
16
77
18
19
20
27
22
23
24
25
next month in mid-June. The Company believes that al-I of
these developers are actively seeking contracts/obligations
with the Company prior to such time as the solar
integration study is completed.
o.Does this conclude your testimony?
A. Yes.
ALLPHIN, DI 8
Idaho Power Company
1
2
3
4(
6
1
8
9
10
11
72
13
l4
15
L6
L1
18
19
20
27
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ATTESTATION OF TESTIMONY
STATE OF
County of
IDAHO )\ ^^,/ DD.
Ada )
I, Randy A11phin, having been duly sworn to testify
truthfully, and based upon my personal knowledge, state the
following:
I am employed by Idaho Power Company as Energy
Contracts Coordinator Leader in the Load Serving Operations
Department and am competent to be a witness in this
proceeding.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of
the state of Idaho that the foregoing pre-filed testimony
and exhibit are true and correct to the best of my
information and belief.
DATED this 13th day of May 20L4.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me
Nlay 2014 .
this 13th day of
ALLPHIN, DI 9
Idaho Power Company
otary Publii
Residing at:
My commi-ssion expire
o
BEFORE THE
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
GASE NO. IPC-E-14-09
IDAHO POWER COMPANY
ALLPHIN, DI
TESTIMONY
EXHIBIT NO. 1
ldaho Power Company
Cogeneration and Small Power Production
QF Solar Contracts
As of May 12th, 2014
Subtotal 60.0 MW
Draft Contracts and lndicative lncremental Cost IRP Avoided Cost pricing provided
Proiect Name
Executed Contracts
1 Open Range Solar Center, LLC
2 Vale Air Solar Center, LLC
3 Grove Solar Center, LLC
4 Hyline Solar Center, LLC
5 Railroad Solar Center, LLC
6 Thunderegg Solar Center, LLC
1 Price and Draft 1
2 Price and Draft 2
3 Price and Draft 3
4 Price and Draft 4
5 Price and Draft 5
6 Price and Draft 5
7 Price and Draft 7
1 lnquire 1
2 lnquire 2
3 lnquire 3
4 lnquire 4
5 lnquire 5
6 lnquire 6
7 lnquire 7
8 lnquire 8
9 lnquire 9
10 lnquire 10
11 lnquire 11
12 lnquire 12
13 lnquire 13
14 lnquire 14
15 lnquire 15
16 lnquire 16
Nameplate
Rating State County
10.0 Mw oR
10.0 MW oR
10.0 MW OR
10.0 MW OR
10.0 Mw oR
10.0 MW OR
40.0 Mw
20.0 MW
20.0 MW
20.0 MW
20.0 Mw
20.0 MW
20.0 MW
20.0 Mw tD
20.0 MW rD
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
72/3r12076
12/3u2076
t2l3u2ot6
12131/2016
L2/3L/2Ot6
L2/3L/2016
72/3L/20L6 Est
12/3L/2OL6 Est
72/3L{2OL5 Est
t2/3U2OLs Est
t2137/20L5 Est
12/3L{2OLS EsI
L2|3U2OLS Est
Scheduled
Operation
Date
Estimated total
contract
payment
537,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
S37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
$227,139As?
57s7,667,248
s76,268,0s1
57r,216,s93
57L,276,s93
s71,2L6,593
57t,2t6,s93
s71,216,s93
Estimated total
lntetration Cost,
assuming $6.50
per MWh
52,737,477
52,737,477
52,737,477
52,73r,477
52,737,4L7
52,73L,477
$16,388,s02
512,72r,8OO
s5,264,330
ss,618,730
Ss,618,730
ss,618,730
Ss,618,730
5s,618,730
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
Ada
Bannock
Elmore
Elmore
Elmore
Elmore
Elmore
Jerome
Owyhee
subtotal 160.0 Mw
lndicative lncremental Cost IRP Avoided Cost pricing orovided
1 Price Only 1
2 Price Only 2
Ssgo,otz,zu 547,079,780
r2/3L/20t6Est 576,48L,642 56,732,490
L2/3U2OL6 Est s71,130,9s7 ss,383,086
Subtotal 40.0 Mw
Serious lnquires received, initial discussion and/or meetinss conducted
Elmore
Bingham
Payette
Gem
Ada
Washington
Grant
Grant
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
Malhuer
s147,6L2,599
57L,2t6,s93
s1,196,8s4
sL18,243,248
5t18,243,248
5tt8,243,248
57t8,243,248
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
537,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
s37,8s6,s7s
511,s1s,s76
Ss,618,730
s100,334
S9,s41,149
59,s4L,749
S9,541,149
S9,s41,149
52,737,4t7
52,73t,4t7
s2,737,477
52,73r,477
52,737,4r7
52,737,417
52,737,4t7
52,737,477
52,73t,4L7
52,737,477
20.0 MW
1.0 MW
30.0 MW
30.0 MW
30.0 MW
30.0 MW
10.0 MW
10.0 Mw
10.0 Mw
10.0 Mw
10.0 MW
10.0 Mw
10.0 MW
10.0 Mw
10.0 MW
10.0 Mw
Subtotal 241.0 MW
,o,", [ffi|L-J
ldaho Total :t41.0 Mw
Oregon Total 160.0 Mw
s923,9s2,193 57t,L97,828
s1,283,011,302
56Os,7Os,2O7
$t02,479,O13
$43,702,672 Exhibit No. 1
Case No. IPC-E-14-09
R. Allphin, IPC
Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 13th day of May 2014 I served a true and correct
copy of the DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MNDY ALLPHIN upon the following named
parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
Donald L. Howel!, ll
Kristine A. Sasser
Deputy Attorneys General
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W est Washington (83702)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-007 4
Peter J. Richardson
RICHARDSON ADAMS, PLLC
515 North 27s Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
Robert Paul
515 North 27s Street
Boise, ldaho 83702
Mark VanGulick
P.O. Box 7354
Boise, Idaho 83707
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
Email don. howell@puc. idaho.qov
kris.sasser@puc. idaho.qov
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAXX Email peter@richardsonadams.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
Emai! robertapaul8@qmail.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
Email mvanqulick@sunerqvworld.com
Bearry, Legal Assistant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE