HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140314IIPA Comments.pdfil RACINE
OLSON
NYE
BUDGE
BAILEY
2O1 E. Center St.
P.O. Box 1391
Pocatello, lD 83204
o 208.232.6101
F 208.232.6109
racinelaw.net
Eric L. Olsen, LL.M
elo@racinelaw.net
'-! fl, :,i j: li;
March 14,2014
Jean J. Jewell, Secretary
ldaho Public Utilities Commission
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ldaho 83720-0084
Re: Case No. IPGE-13-21
Dear Mrs. Jewell:
Enclosed for filing in the captioned case please find the original and one copy of
the IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS ASSOCTATION, TITC'S PUBLIC COMMENTS.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,F
ERIC L. OLSEN
ELOTI
Enclosuresc: Service List (Via Email)
Eric L. Olsen (ISB#: 4811)
RACINE, OLSON, NYE,
BUDGE & BAILEY, CHARTERED
P.O. Box 1391
Pocatello,Idaho 83204-1391 ,
Telephone : (208)232-6101
Fax: (208)232-6109
Email: elo@racinelaw.com
Attorneys for the ldaho lrrigation Pumpers Association, Inc.
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
i i-.
ir,: i: l!
IN THE MATTER OF IDAHO POWER
COMPAI{Y' S APPLICATION FOR
APPROVAL OF ITS CAPACITY
DEFICIENCY PERIOID TO BE
UTILIZED IN TIIE COMPANY'S SAR
METHODOLOGY
CASE NO.IPC-E.I3.zI
IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.'S PUBLIC
COMMENTS
COMES NOW, the Idaho Inigation Pumpers Association,Inc. ("IIPA"), and
hereby provides public comment in above case. The IIPA acknowledges that these
comments are made out of time in that the public comment period expired on February
28,2014. The IIPA does not normally participate in cases of this nature and thus, has not
filed a Petition to Intervene. However, after reviewing the Comments of the Commission
Staff dated February 28,2014, we find it necessary to raise our concerns with the Staff s
proposal. Although the IIPA agrees with most of Staff s comments, we take exception
with a few of the StafPs conclusions that dramatically alter the impact on ratepayers.
The IIPA's public comments will not broaden the issues addressed in this case and will
not prejudice any party to this case.
As pointed out by the Staff, this case is the outcome of Order No. 32697 that
directed that a case be initiated outside of each utility's Integrated Resource Plan ("IRP")
filing to establish a capacity deficiency period to be utilized in the utility's Surrogate
Avoided Resource ("SAR") methodology for computing avoided cost rates to be included
in PURPA power purchase agreements. OrderNo. 32697 was issued on December 18,
2012 or approximately 15 months ago.
As recognizedby the Staff, a lot of changes in Idaho Power's IRP filings have
occurred since Order No. 32697:
o Idaho Power filed its 2013 IRP on June 28,2013. In that filing, Idaho Power
identified its first peak-hour deficit occurring in July 2016.
IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS ASSOCIATION, INC.' S PUBLIC COMMENTS
Idaho Power filed updated components to its incremental cost IRP avoided cost
methodology on October 15,2013. After these updates, Idaho Power identified
its first peak-hour deficit occurring in July 2013.
o Most important and germane to the instant case, Idaho Power once again updated
its peak-hour deficit on October 2,2013 by the inclusion of its demand response
programs that resulted from a settlement agreement in Case IPC-E-13-14. Wittl
inclusion of the demand response programs, the first peak-hour deficit does not
occur until July 2021.
o The Commission approved the settlement agreement regarding the future of
demand response progmms that came out of Case IPC-E-13-14 on November 12,
2013.
The sefflement in the demand response case added 440 MW of load response to Idaho
Power's resource balance. This is based upon the actual load response capacity that had
historically existed--demand response equipment on specific resources. The new peak-
hour deficit date of July 2021is based upon this 440 MW of demand response.
As stated in the Staff s Comments, there is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the
amount of demand response resources that will be participating at any point in the future.
The settlement in Case IPC-E-13-14 provided for lower incentives to be paid as well as
changes to the frequency of curtailment/intemrptions. The Staff Comments at page 5
stated:
Staff supported reducing payments to irrigators in the belief that it is more
important to lower costs for all ratepayers than pay higher incentives in an
attempt to maintain demand response in excess of the supply-side resource
it defers.
The Staff and Idaho Power agree that there will be some decrease in participation
because of these changes. IIPA also agrees that there will be some level of decrease.
But, no one knows what the impact of those changes will be. However, this reduction in
participation is not permanent. The decrease in incentive payment and the increased
intemrptions were designed to directly save money for all ratepayers by lowering the
incentive cost, and indirectly by reducing (by some unknown amount) the level of
participation.
Up until this point, the IIPA agrees with the Staff. However, the Staff is now
proclaiming that the 440 MW of potential demand resources will drop to 170 MW and
that Idaho Power will be facing a capacity deficit as early as July 2016. The Staff has
come full circle. First it felt that ldaho Power was paying too much for demand response
and had too much (440 MW) of demand response that it would not need for years. By
reducing the incentive that is paid for demand response, the Staff expects to save
ratepayers money and not spend money "in an attempt to maintain demand response in
IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S PUBLIC COMMENTS 2
excess of the supply-side resource it defers." Now, the Staff claims that the demand
response resources will drop from 440 MW to 170 MW (without support), and that
higher avoided cost rates will be needed to be paid for new PURPA contracts to fill the
capacity deficit that was caused by reducing the incentive paid to demand response
participants.
Furthermore, the Staff ignores the fact that the level of demand response
resources can easily be brought up to former levels by simply increasing the incentive
back to previous levels and./or by instituting less harsh curtailment parameters. At the
moment the ratepayers have the best of both worlds with 440 MW of potential demand
response resources available, while paying rates and having terms that will greatly reduce
the amount paid by ratepayers. As the need arises (and only as the need arises) incentive
rates and terms can be adjusted to bring on more demand response resources that are
already in the field and hooked up.
On pages 6 and 7 of its Comments, the Staffrecognizes "that Idaho Power will
have a year of modified progmm experience before publishing its next IRP in 2015." If
the Commission is going to set new SAR rates soon, then it should use the most recent
value for demand response resources (440 MW) that was used in the settlement approved
by the Commission on November 12,2013. Before using any value other than the 440
MW demand response figure, the Commission should wait until the 2015 IRP is released
and Idaho Power has more experience with the new rates that went into effect for this
coming summer. Given the overlap that occurs between the relationship of the price of
incentives, the amount of demand resources that are available, the impact on future
deficits, and SAR rates, the Commission should consider addressing all of these factors at
the same time.
DATED U, Af'*aay of March,2ll4.
RACINE OLSON NYE BUDGE
& BAILEY, CHARTERED
IDAHO IRzuGATION PUMPERS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S PUBLIC COMMENTS
CERTIFICATE OF SERYICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 1ffiay of March,2ll3l served a true,
correct and complete copy of the Idaho Irrigation Pumpers Association, Inc.'s Public
Comments to each of the following, via U.S. Mail or private courier, e-mail or hand
delivery, as indicated below:
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
P.O. Box 83720
47 2 W . Washington Street
Boise, Idaho 83720-007 4
ij ewell@puc. state.id.us
Donovan Walker
Idaho Power Company
P.O. Box 70
Boise,lD 83707
dwalker(E idahooower. com
Randy Allphin
Tess Park
Idaho Power Company
P.O. Box 70
Boise,ID 83707
rallphin@idahopower. com
tpark2@ idahopower. com
U.S. Mail/Postage Prepaid
E-Mail
Facsimile
Ovemight Mail
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail/Postage Prepaid
E-Mail
Facsimile
Overnight Mail
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail/Postage Prepaid
E-Mail
Facsimile
Overnight Mail
Hand Delivered
1/
,r/
IDAHO IRRIGATION PUMPERS ASSOCIATION,INC.'S PUBLIC COMMENTS 4