Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130507Comment.pdfJean Jewell From: 05jkirk©gmail.com Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 12:41 PM To: Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness Subject: PUC Comment Form A Comment from JOANNA KIRKPATRICK follows: Case Number: IPC-E-13-10 Name: JOANNA KIRKPATRICK Address: 2005 N 17TH ST City: BOISE State: ID Zip: 83702 Daytime Telephone: Contact E-Mail: 05ikirkgmail.com Name of Utility Company: idaho power Acknowledge: acknowledge Please describe your comment briefly: IP should not get the rate increase they ask for, especially since they don't pay sufficient attention to overall efficiency of operations. The Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) should be a much more accurate forecast. I would suggest an increase or decrease of 3-5% per year. Anything above or below should be handled in a normal rate case. Very few corporations in the US still have defined benefit pension plans. Many companies in the last several years have had to restructure or go bankrupt because of having such pension plans. These are not sustainable and the ratepayers should not be paying for this type of pension plan. A hearing should be held for this very sudden and high rate increase. IP is trying to get away with crushing the ratepayers. Any rate increase should be reasonable and would be paid for if IP got more efficient! Please hold hearings if IP doesn't back down on their rate increase. The form submitted on htt p ://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/i ouci/€€ipuc.html IP address is 96.18.250.228 1