Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130607Comments (2 Total).pdfJean Jewel! From:secretary Sent:Thursday,June 06,2013 5:42 PM To:Barb Barrows;Jean Jewell Subject:FW:Public Comment on IPC-E-12-27 From:Wendy Wilson[SMTP:WWILSON@RIVERNETWORK.ORG] Sent:Thursday,June 06,2013 5:43:36 PM To:secretary Subject:Public Comment on IPC-E-12-27 Auto forwarded by a Rule Dear Commissioners: Please reject the request of Idaho Power Company in docket IPC-E-12-27 regarding net-metering of solar and changes to the current cap.Idaho has great solar resources and any cap at all is not in the public interest until Idaho Power has divested from out-of-state coal-fired plants that are expensive and may become unreliable in the future.I would love to invest in Idaho’s solar future as a homeowner and potential distributed-energy producer.If Idaho Power cannot provide a link to the future for its customers then why do they have a guaranteed monopoly on our electric services? Wendy Wendy Wilson National Director of Rivers,Energy &climate Programs (208)345-3689 home office (208)869-4091 cell wwilsonrivernetwork.oro 3209 N 39th St,Boise,ID 83703 www.rivernetwork.org 1 Jean Jewell From:secretary Sent:Friday,June 07,2013 4:00 PM To:Barb Barrows;Jean Jewell Subject:FW:IPUC case #IPC-E-12-27 From:mark davis[SMTP:MARK WORLDWIDE(HOTMAlL.COM] Sent:Friday,June 07,2013 4:01:16 PM To:secretary Subject:Re:IPUC case #IPC-E-12-27 Auto forwarded by a Rule I am disappointed that Id Power continues to fight wind power and now rooftop solar. These installations provide a valuable buffer against low water years. sincerely,mark davis 409 pueblo,boise,id $3702 1