HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130307Comments (2 Total).pdfJean Jewell
From: Gene Fadness
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 5:05 PM
To: Jean Jewell
Subject: Fwd: Another comment
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Britt Ide <britt(idelawstrategy.com >
Date: March 6, 2013 9:3 9:49 AM PST
To: Gene Fadness <gene.fadness2ipuc.idaho.gov >
Subject: Another comment
Gene,
I still can't get the PUC website comment feature to work. Please log my comment below on
docket IPC E-12-27.
I'd ask the PUC to please evaluate this docket carefully. I represent clients that are in the
business of installing solar systems. Please find a reasonable solution to meet Idaho Power's
concerns that doesn't kill an important industry in Idaho. I'd recommend encouraging a quick
negotiated settlement (delay will kill the industry). Thank you.
I acknowledge that this is public record.
ae Britt E Ide
Creativity
: ;
LAw&TRATEGv 208 407 6220
brittdeIawstrateqy.com
idetawstrateqy.com
Jean Jewell
From: Darring2hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 2:40 AM
To: Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness
Subject: PUC Comment Form
A Comment from Darrin Hendricks follows:
Case Number: IPC-E-12-27
Name: Darrin Hendricks
Address: 9951 N lariat st
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83714
Daytime Telephone:
Contact E-Mail: Darring2(hotmail.com
Name of Utility Company: Idaho Power
Acknowledge: acknowledge
Please describe your comment briefly:
I believe in solar power. As citizen concerned about harnessing energy in a responsible way
I have modified my home to facilitate a solar installation, so I'm quite disappointed with
attempts to squash the efforts of many, like myself who could provide clean power at
reasonable rates to the grid at a time when its needed most.
Solar power should be part of a balanced energy portfolio, and the result of this proposal is
a slap in the face to all who have exercised their right to utilize another source of power.
I have supported 1PCO for a lifetime, and without support from others like me there would be
no IPCO, grid or net metering issue to argue about. That said, it's not right to allow IPCO a
monopoly on power in the future because of the past.
We have all paid for this infrastructure with dollars and other intangible results over the
years, and I subscribe that we should continue to be able to push the envelope for better
power solutions.
Locking up the tool shed isn't going to accomplish this.
The form submitted on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/jpuc.html
IP address is 70.58.58.158