Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110920Comments.pdfKARL T. KLEIN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO BOX 83720 BOISE, IDAHO 83720-0074 (208) 334-0312 IDAHO BAR NO. 5156 ..ref' I\I,.!"I ;,' l-!-. \.! "f'- ~._;)l'\:" " -..l t¡,."..., 23l i SEP 20 AM 10= 05 S¡~Jr\t Street Address for Express Mail: 472 W. WASHINGTON BOISE, IDAHO 83702-5983 Attorney for the Commission Staff BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR APPROV AL ) OF ITS ENERGY EFFICIENCY INCENTIVE ) AGREEMENT WITH THE IDAHO OFFICE OF )ENERGY RESOURCES. ) ) ) CASE NO. IPC-E-1l-16 COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF The Staff of the Idaho Public Utilties Commission comments as follows on Idaho Power Company's Application for approval of its Energy Efficiency Incentive Agreement with the Idaho Offce of Energy Resources ("OER"). BACKGROUND On July 21,2011, Idaho Power and OER entered into an Agreement to set forth some basic parameters that would provide for the accumulation and reinvestment of energy efficiency incentive payments from Idaho Power for qualified energy efficiency programs implemented by OER's K-12 Energy Efficiency Project for public schools. Application at 1. The Agreement states that the intent is to maximize the available dollars from both the OER federal stimulus funds and Idaho Power's energy efficiency incentives in order to help OER's energy effciency initiatives continue to provide benefits past the availabilty of the stimulus fuds. Agreement at 1. STAFF COMMENTS 1 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 According to the Agreement, OER has approximately $9.6 milion in federal fuding for the K-12 program over the next 12 months. Idaho Power offers a number of energy effciency programs which include incentive payments to customers who install qualifying energy efficiency measures. The Application states that OER will invest federally provided funds into energy effciency projects for Idaho Power customers. Application at 2. Any incentive payments from Idaho Power for measures installed through OER's K-12 public school program will be paid into a dedicated fund held by Idaho Power. Application at 3. These fuds wil be eararked for use in additional cost-effective energy effciency measures for Idaho Power customers identified by the K-12 Energy Effciency Project, and limited to OER's continued implementation of cost-effective energy efficiency projects for Idaho Power customers. Id. at 3. The Agreement states that OER may use up to ten percent of the monies from this dedicated fud to reimburse reasonable and prudent administration costs associated with the reinvestment of incentive payments into cost-effective energy efficiency programs. Agreement at 2. The Company claims that this agreement wil accomplish a higher level of energy efficiency than either pary could achieve with their respective programs alone. Application at 1. STAFF REVIEW. In reviewing the Agreement, Staff notes that it is does not tae a position on or determine how any Idaho Power customer chooses to handle the incentive payments it receives through paricipation in the Company's demand-side management (DSM) programs. Staffs primary concern with the Agreement is that Idaho Power's qualification of projects funded through OER be held to the same standards as all of the Company's other DSM projects. The Agreement contains some ambiguity on this subject. Page one of the Agreement reads "... incentive payments from IPC for OER's qualified energy efficiency projects would be made in accordance with IPC's existing energy efficiency programs." On the following page, the previous statement is augmented with "The intent is to keep the qualification and payment of IPC incentives, as well as the directed re-investment of incentive money into additional energy efficiency measures, as close to identical as possible to IPC's other customer related incentive and energy effciency programs." Agreement at 2 (italics added). However, Staffis reassured by Idaho Power's response to Staffs Production Request NO.1 in which the Company confirms that, "...(OER-fuded projects) would either qualify or not qualify for such incentives according STAFF COMMENTS 2 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 to Idaho Power's existing rules for the operation of those incentives programs. OER would be treated no differently than any other customer or entity that would apply for energy efficiency incentives with Idaho Power." Staf maintains that projects be evaluated identically. In Idaho Power's response to Staffs Production Request No.7, the Company lists Custom Efficiency, Easy Upgrades, and Building Efficiency as the three programs for which school efficiency projects may qualify for incentive payments. In Order No. 32245, the Commission allowed Idaho Power to begin accounting for incentives paid through the Custom Efficiency program as a regulatory asset. Exclusive of projects funded through OER, these incentives were estimated to be $5.6 milion in 2012. As stated on page 74 of the Company's 2010 DSM Annual Report, the incentive levels for the Custom Effciency program can be up to 70 percent of the project cost. The DSM report also states that the Company plans to develop a "single lighting calculator" to be used by both the Custom Efficiency program and Easy Upgrades program in order to "standardize terms and conditions, and follow a similar project verification protocol between programs". Because many of the incentive payments made to schools since 2009 have been for lighting retrofits, the consolidation of lighting calculators wil help all parties evaluate future incentive payments made to schools. Staff anticipates that the additional $9.6 milion potentially invested by OER through the three eligible DSM programs wil exceed previous program demand forecasts and therefore significantly increase the number of projects incented, the dollar amount of incentive payments issued, as well as the amount of regulatory assets capitalized. Consequently, Staffwil increase its scrutiny of these programs and recommends that the Company maintain clear and comprehensive records. As the Company is aware, this Agreement does not presume recovery of expenses incurred through the Agreement. Staff reiterates that all program decisions, incentives, and administrative payments issued through this Agreement, as with all of the Company's programs, are subject to a prudency determination by the Commission in advance of recovering fuds. This includes, but is not limited to, verification of Net- to-Gross (NT G) values, including sources, as well as justification for program rules and incentive amounts. STAFF COMMENTS 3 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Lastly, Staff assumes that the Agreement will apply to projects implemented after the date of the Commission Order approving creation of the dedicated fud held by Idaho Power. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission approve the Agreement between Idaho Power and OER with the understanding that projects within each DSM program receive identical evaluation, and that the Agreement be applied to projects implemented after the date of the Commission Order approving creation of the dedicated fund held by Idaho Power. Respectfully submitted this 20K day of September 2011. il1t- Karl T. Klein Deputy Attorney General Technical Staff: Stacey Donohue i:umisc/commentsipce 11.16kksd comments STAFF COMMENTS 4 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2011, SERVED THE FOREGOING COMMENTS OF THE COMMISSION STAFF, IN CASE NO. IPC-E-11-16, BY E-MAILING AND MAILING A COPY THEREOF, POSTAGE PREPAID, TO THE FOLLOWING: DONOVANE. WALKER JASON B. WILLIAMS LEGAL DEPARTMENT IDAHO POWER COMPANY P.O. BOX 70 BOISE IDAHO 83707 E-MAIL: dwalken8)idahopower.com jwiliamsêidahopower.com MICHAEL 1. YOUNGBLOOD GREGORY W. SAID IDAHO POWER COMPANY P.O. BOX 70 BOISE IDAHO 83707 E-MAIL: myoungblood("idahopower.com gsaidêidahopower.com JOHN CHATBURN SUE SEIFERT OFFICE OF ENERGY RESOURCES 304 NORTH 8TH STREET SUITE 250 BOISE IDAHO 83720-0199 john.chatburn("oer.idaho.gov sue.seifert("oer .idaho. gov ~~,K~ SECRETARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE