HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090102Application for Intervenor Funding.pdfBrad M. Purdy
Attorney at Law
BarNo. 3472
2019 N. 17th S1.
Boise, ID. 83702
(208) 384-1299
FAX: (208) 384-8511
bmpurdyrfhotmail.com
Attorney for Applicant
Community Action Partnership
Association of Idaho
REC
2009 JAN -2 PM 2: 38
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY )
TO INCREASE ITS RATES AND CHARGES )
FOR ELECTRIC SERVICD TO ELECTRIC )
CUSTOMERS IN THE STATE OF IDAHO )
)
)
)
CASE NO. IPC-E-08-10
COMMUITY ACTION
PARTNRSHIP ASSOC-
TIATION OF IDAHO'S
APPLICATION FOR INTER-
VENOR FUNING
COMES NOW, Applicant Community Action Partnership Association ofIdaho
(CAPAI) and, pursuant to Idaho Code § 61-617A and Rules 161-165 ofth~ Commission's
Rules of Procedure, IDAPA 31.01.01, petitions this Commission for an award of intervenor
funding.
Rule 161 Requirements
Idaho Power Company is a regulated, electric public utilty with gross Idaho
intrastate, annual revenues exceeding three milion, five hundred thousand dollars
($3,500,000.00).
(01) Itemized list of Expenses
Consistent with Rule 162(01) of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, an itemized
list of all expenses incurred by CAP AI in this proceeding is attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 1
(02) Statement of Proposed Findings
The proposed findings and recommendations of CAP AI are set forth in the direct,
prefied testimony of Teri Ottens. In summary, CAPAI initially proposes that the
Commission consider the dire state of poverty in which a significant percentage of Idaho
Power's customers live and the effect that any significant rate increase wil have on these
already overly burdened customers.
Second, CAP AI proposes that Idaho Power extend its two-tiered residential rate to
cover the entire year, as proposed by the Company, but proposes that the first tier be
increased to 850 kWh, as opposed to 600 kWh proposed by Idaho Power. CAPAI asserts
that unless the first tier usage level is set relatively close to what is non-discretionary usage
for the typical residential customer, then the strength of the price signal sent by a properly
structured tiered rate is lost. Based on Idaho Power's own testimony, basic usage, without
heating or cooling, ranges upward to 850 kWh per month according to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. Direct Testimony of Courtney Waites, p. 9.
Of course, in setting the first tier usage level, the Commission is not prohibited from taking
into consideration the fact that that there is some degree of need for cooling or heating
nearly every month out of the year.
Third, CAP AI proposes that the Company increase its low-income weatherization
("WAQC") funding level over a three year period beginning in program year 2010.
Specifically, CAPAI witness Teri Ottens proposes that funding levels for W AQC be set as
follows:
2010 - $1.5 milion
2011 - $1.75 milion
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 2
2012 - $2.05 milion
Fourth, CAP AI proposes that Idaho Power fund an energy conservation education
program specifically targeted to low-income customers such as that recently adopted by
AVISTA Corporation (Case No. AVU-E-08-01). CAPAI proposes that Idaho Power fund
$25,000 for each Community Action Agency operating in the Company's service territory
for a total funding of$125,000.
This program would fund personnel and materials to Community Action Agencies
to provide conservation education to all Idaho Power customers who apply for LIHEAP
funding. Thus, it would result in a productive face-to-face explanation of how customers of
extremely limited means can reduce their energy consumption. Customers seeking
LIHEAP assistance often do not have the ability to implement energy conservation
measures or alter their habits to reduce their consumption due to their dire financial
condition. Indeed, customers who do not have the money to pay their utility bils might not
even open the bil itself and wil never see the traditional informational "stuffers" currently
provided by Idaho Power. Thus, low-income conservation education, as proposed by
CAPAI, presents yet another cost effective resource opportunity for the Company.
Finally, CAP AI proposes that Idaho Power provide monthly arrearage reports to all
interested parties so that CAP AI can monitor trends, and identify possible causes and
solutions regarding the problem of arrearages. PacifiCorp, (DBA, Rocky Mountain Power)
currently provides these arrearage reports.
(03) Statement Showing Costs
CAP AI submits that the costs and fees incurred in this case, and set forth in Exhibit
"A," are reasonable in amount, particularly in light of the fact that the Company's
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 3
application in this matter was fully litigated, and that there were roughly 34 witnesses, with
exhibits, four days of technical hearing, and nine parties who actively participated in the
technical portion of this proceeding.
Although Ms. Teri Ottens undoubtedly qualifies as an expert in the field of energy
issues, as they affect low-income customers, CAP AI is not seeking reimbursement for Ms.
Ottens' work, or that of any other representative or agent of CAP AI. CAP AI has
historically made a concerted effort to minimize its expenses and maximize the effect that
its efforts have in proceedings before this Commission. Thus, CAP AI submits that the time
expended and expenses incurred in this case were reasonable.
(04) Explanation of Cost Statement
CAP AI is a non-profit corporation overseeing a number of agencies who fight the
causes and conditions of poverty throughout Idaho. CAPAI's funding for any given effort
might come from a different variety of sources, including governmental. Many of those
funding sources, however, are unpredictable and impose conditions or limitations on the
scope and nature of work eligible for funding. CAP AI, therefore, has relatively little
"discretionary" funds available and what little exists must cover a variety of competing
projects, including, as one example, participation in Case No. GNR-U-08-01 (Commission-
initiated Energy Affordability Case) for which intervenor funding is unavailable. CAPAI
has incurred considerable expense participating in this very important proceeding. There
are numerous other examples of projects worthy of CAP AI's involvement but for which
funding is unavailable.
Thus, were it not for the availability of intervenor funds and past awards by this
Commission, CAP AI would not be able to participate in cases before this Commission
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 4
leaving a gap not likely to be filled by any other entity. Even with intervenor funding,
participation in Commission cases constitutes a significant financial hardship because
CAP AI must pay its expenses as they are incurred, not if and when intervenor funding
becomes available.
(05) Statement of Difference
Although Staff provided valuable input regarding the energy burden that low
income customers carry, CAP AI's specific proposed findings and recommendations in this
case differ materially from those of Staff. For example, Staff proposes a three-tiered
residential rate with a first tier consumption level of 1000 kWh, as opposed to CAPAI's
proposed two-tiered rate with a first tier of 600 kWh.
Second, although Staff identifies Idaho Power's WAQC program as a beneficial
resource for low-income customers, it made no specific proposal to alter the funding level
ofWAQC as did CAPAI.
Similarly, Staff did not make a proposal to implement a low-income conservation
education program.
Finally, Staff did not propose that Idaho Power provide monthly arrearage report
studies as proposed by CAP AI.
06) Statement of Recommendation
CAPAI has long submitted that providing assistance to a utility's low-income
customers provides system-wide benefits and, therefore, the proposals and
recommendations made by CAP AI are "of concern to the general body of utilty users or
consumers." A good example comes from a statement made by Idaho Power Vice-
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 5
President of Regulatory Affairs John R. Gale, referring to the Company's WAQC program
for which CAPAI proposes increased funding: "The Company has calculated that a $100
investment in WAQC can return more than $200 in present value customer benefits in
future bil savings and over $300 in system benefits because of the selection of a lower cost
resource option." See, Rebuttal Testimony of John R. Gale, pp. 36-37, Emphasis added.
Indeed, it is intuitive that a utilty with a relatively low number of disconnections
and reconnections, caused by customers' inability to pay their bils, is a financially
healthier utility with commensurate benefits to all ratepayers. Assisting those customers
who are financially at the margin of being able to remain on the system provides more than
just social value to a utility's other customers. There are also tangible, system-wide
benefits to avoiding or reducing bad debts, arrearages, and costs associated with
disconnections and reconnections which are passed on to other customers.
(07) Statement Showing Class of Customer
To the extent that CAP AI represents a specific Idaho Power customer class, it is the
residential class.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this 2nd day of January, 2009.
/3c& )Brad M. Purdy ~~)-,./':;;.;.:;.~"~../
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 2nd day of January, 2009, I caused to be served
the foregoing COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO'S
APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING on the following via-electronic
transmission and U.S. postage, first class.
Weldon Stutzman
Neil Price
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington St.
Boise, ID 83702
weldon.stutzmanrfpuc.idaho.gov
BARTON L. KLINE, ISB #1526
LISA D. NORDSTROM, ISB #5733
DONOVAN E. WALKER, ISB #5921
Idaho Power Company
P.O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
Telephone: (208) 388-2682
Facsimile: (208) 388-6936
bkline(qidahopower .com
lnordstrom(qidahopower .com
dwalkerrfidahopower .com
John R. Gale
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Idaho Power Company
P.O. Box 70
Boise, Idaho 83707
rgalerfidahopower.com
Peter J. Richardson
Richardson & O'Leary
Industrial Customers of Idaho Power
515 N. 27th St
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, Idaho 83702
Telephone: (208) 938-7901
Fax: (208) 938-7904
peterrfrichardsonan do leary. com
Dr. Don Reading
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 7
6070 Hil Road
Boise, Idaho 83703
(208) 342-1700 Tel
(208) 384-1511 Fax
dreadingrfmindsp ring. com
Randall C. Budge
Eric L. Olsen
Racine, Olson, Nye, Budge &
Bailey, Chartered
P.O. Box 1391; 201 E. Center
Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391
Telephone: (208) 232-6101
Fax: (208) 232-6109
rc brfracinelaw .net
elorfracinelaw.net
Anthony Yankel
29814 Lake Road
Bay Vilage, Ohio 44140
Fax: 440-808-1450
tonyrfyankel.net
Michael L. Kurtz, Esq.
Kurt J. Boehm, Esq.
BOEHM, KUTZ & LOWRY
36 East Seventh Street, Suite 1510
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Telephone: 513-421-2255 Facsimile: 513-421-2764
E-mail: mkurtzrfBKLlawfrm.com
kboehm(qBKLlawfrm.com
Kevin Higgins
Energy Strategies, LLC
Parkside Towers
215 South State Street, Suite 200
Salt Lake City, Uta 84111
E-mail: khigginsrfenergystrat.com
Conley E. Ward
Givens Pursley, LLP
601 W. Bannock St.
P.O. Box 2720
Boise,ID 83701-2720
cewrfgivenspursley. com
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 8
. .
Dennis Peseau, PhD
Utilty Resources, Inc.
1500 Liberty St. SE, Suite 250
Salem, OR 97302
dennytemprfyahoo.com
Arthur Bruder
Offce of General Counsel
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington DC, 20585
Arthur.B ruderrfhg.doe.gov
Ken Miler
Snake River Allance
P.O. Box 1731
Boise, ID 83701
kmilerrfsnakeri verallance.org
L5C)~ ~BradM. Purdy ~
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 9
. ,. ..
Costs:
Photocopies/postage
Total Costs
Fees:
EXHIBIT "A"
ITEMIZED EXPENSES
Legal (Brad M. Purdy -76.00 hours (q $120.00/hr)
Total Fees
Total Expenses
$63.00
$63.00
$9,120.00
$9,120.00
$9,183.00
CAPAI APPLICATION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING Page 10