HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080521Micron Comments.pdf/
GIVE SLEY LLP
LAW OFFICES
601 W. Bannock Street
PO Box 2720, Boise, Idaho 83701
TELEPHONE: 208 388-1200
FACSIMILE: 208 388-1300
WEBSITE: ww.givenspursley.com
Via Hand Delivery
Jean Jewell
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Gary G. Allen
Peter G. Barton
Christopher J. Beeson
Clint R. Bolinder
Erik J. Bolindèr
Jeremy C. Chou
Wiiliam C. Cole
Michael C. Creamer
Amber N. Dina
Kristin Bjorkman Dunn
Thomas E. Dvorak
Jeffrey C. Fereday
Justin M. Fredin
Martin C. Hendrickson
Steven J. Hippler
May 20,2008
Debora K. Kristensen
Anne C. Kunkel
Jeremy G. Ladle
Michael P. Lawrence
Franklin G. Lee
David R. Lombardi
John M. Marshail
Kenneth R. McClure
Keily Greene McConneil
Cynthia A. Melilo
Christopher H. Meyer
L. Edward Miler
Patrick J. Miiler
Judson B. Montgomery
Deborah E. Nelson
Kelsey J. Nunez
W. Hugh O'Riordan, LL.M.
G. Andrew Page
Angela M. Reed
Scott A. Tschirgi, LL.M.
J. WiilVarin
Conley E. Ward
Robert B. White
Terr R.Yost
In the Matter of the Application of Idaho Power Company for
Authority to Increase Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) Rates for
Electric Service from June 1,2008 through May 31, 2009
Case Number: IPC-E-08-07
4489-32
Re:
Our File:
Dear Jean:
Enclosed for filing please find an original and nine (9) copies of Micron's
Comments to Notice of Modified Procedure in the above entitled matter.
Than you for your assistance in this matter.
:ITfJ~Q
CEW/tma
cc: Service List (w/enclosures)
S:\CLIENTS\4489\32\CEW to Jewell re Comments. DOC
RETIRED
Kenneth L. Pursley
Raymo~. Givens
James gcClure:i~Nc:
"'::ç,.
,.""*"1,_.1
ç'-
'.-. ;i-!...., .,~..,
Conley E. Ward (ISB No. 1683)
GIVENS PURSLEY LLP
601 W. Banock Street
P.O. Box 2720
Boise, ID 83701-2720
Telephone No. (208) 388-1200
Fax No. (208) 388-1300
cew(fgivenspursley.com
ZOOUiAY 20 lri q:41
Attorneys for Micron Technology, Inc.
S:\CLIENTS\4489\32\Mcron Comments. doc
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION
OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY FOR
AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT POWER
COST ADJUSTMENT (PCA) RATES FOR
ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM JUNE 1,2008
THROUGH MAY 31, 2009
Case No. IPC-E-08-07
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S
COMMENTS TO NOTICE OF
MODIFIED PROCEDURE
Micron Technology, Inc. ("Micron"), by and through its attorney of record, Conley E.
Ward, Givens Pursley LLP, respectfully submits the following comments in response to Order
No. 30540, dated April 25, 2008. Micron is opposed to Idaho Power Company's request for a
one time 100% tracking of power supply and PURP A expenses for the following reasons:
ARGUMENT
1. Idaho Power offers three reasons for its proposal. To quote the Commission's
Notice of Application, Idaho Power argues that a one time abrogation of the existing PCA rules
is justified because of "persistent drought conditions (in recent years), the lack of inclusion of
prescriptive hedging activities in PCA forecast methodology, and the failure of a number of
PURPA projects to come on-line as envisioned in the last approved test year." Notice of
Application at 4.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY'S COMMENTS - 1
2. Idaho Power's first argument, that persistent drought conditions have resulted in
losses for the utility, is basically nonsensicaL. Of course, Idaho Power lost money on the PCA
during the drought, but it is equally true that ratepayer PCA losses during the same period were
nine times those of Idaho Power, amounting to hundreds of milions of dollars. If Idaho Power is
arguing that it should have a one time chance to make up some of these losses, then the
ratepayers have a nine times more powerful argument for the same outcome.
3. The fact that Idaho Power has adopted prescriptive hedging rules is irrelevant. At
bottom, these rules are designed to optimize the risk/reward potential of trading activities. Ths
is nothing less than Idaho Power's obligation as a regulated utilty; it is required by law to adopt
such rules and regulations as shall be 'just and reasonable." See Idaho Code Section 61-303. To
offer a utilty an extra reward for doing what is sensible and prudent is offensive to the whole
scheme of regulation.
4. If, in fact, PURPA projects are coming on line more slowly than Idaho Power
envisioned, it is diffcult to say what impact this would have on the PCA. Some projects,
whether utility owned or otherwse, are always behind schedule. Moreover, Idaho Power has
argued for 30 years that PURP A projects are overpriced. Without stirrng up this old arguent,
it is reasonable to ask Idaho Power how the delay of supposedly overpriced projects in what
looks to be a good water year could somehow be detrimental? And, if so, why should that be
chargeable 100% to the ratepayers, rather than 90%?
5. Having dealt with Idaho Power's three arguments for a one time suspension of the
PCA rules, there are two other reasons to deny the request. First, the original rationale for the
90/10 split remains as valid as ever. The fact that Idaho Power "has some skin in the game"
MICRON TECHNOLOGY'S COMMENTS - 2
provides a crucial assurance that the Company is properly motivated to minimize power supply
costs.
Second, allowing the utility to pick and choose 100% recovery on a case by case basis is
the worst of all possible outcomes from the ratepayers' point of view. If such a precedent is
established, Idaho Power will be motivated to seek full recovery when conditions appear bleak,
while accepting the benefits of a 90/10 split when power costs are projected to be lower than
PCA base costs. This makes absolutely no sense as a matter of regulatory policy.
For these reasons Micron opposes Idaho Power's request for a 100% tracking of power
supply and PURP A costs in this case.
Respectfully submitted this 20th day of May, 2008.
Q
Co ey E. d, Givens Pursley LLP
Attorneys for Micron Technology, Inc.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY'S COMMENTS - 3
..
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 20th day of May, 2008, I caused to be served a tre
and correct copy of the foregoing by the method indicated below, and addressed to the following:
U.S. Mail
X Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
E-Mail
-LU.S.MailHand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
E-Mail
x U.S. Mail;
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
E-Mail
Jean Jewell
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
472 W. Washington Street
Boise, rD 83720-0074
Baron L. Kline
Lisa D. Nordstrom
Idaho Power Company
1221 W. Idaho Street (83702)
P.O. Box 70
Boise,ID 83707
email: bkline(fidahopower.com
Inordstrom(fidahopower .com
Timothy E. Tatum
John R. Gale
Idaho Power Company
P.O. Box 70
Boise, ID 83707-0070
email: ttatum(fidahopower.com
rgale(fidahopower .com
Peter J. Richardson
Richardson & O'Lear
515 N. 2ih Street
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, ID 83702
email: peter(frichardsonandoleary.com
J-U.S.MailHand Delivered
Overnght Mail
Facsimile
E-Mail
MICRON TECHNOLOGY'S COMMENTS - 4
o