200805162nd Reply Comments.pdf

2/4/08 and 2nd mailing 4/18/08
A.M. Scott Pamela A. Bowers
9559 W. Hils Gate Dr.
Sta, ID. 83669-5300
21 Pìi 2= 49
i.3
Regardig the Janua 17th anwer Cas # IPC-E-07-14
Attention: Idao Power, PUC and
To Whom It May Concern:
We wish to addrs the issues and fact th you wil not anwer or resolve in our
opinon...
1. Why will you not show in your pictues tht there is a servce box in Blessingers
lot tht is and was for, the servce for both lots? He fenced it in it is on his lot.
2. Th box is the box tht is in the eaement! The box we paid for is in a set-back
on our propert. The box we pad for had nothg to do with and wa not for
Blessinger! Eah and every lot owner was and stll is requied to get heir own
service!
3. Pleae describe to us the procur, show us the rues or reguations with regar
to egress and ingress.
4. Why is there no policy, procedures or rues with regard to giving notice to the
propert owner(s)?
5. Pleas explai why no notice, no disclosus, is requi to be given to the lot
owner tht is unowigly payig the enti bil. We never would have gott
service for a "yar light". We are not stupid; we would have let Blessinger instl
the power!!!!!!!! A building was going to. be built on tht lot; we needed a yard
light.... We should have ben inormed that we can hook-up for fr!!!!!!!! Jus
wait. Disclosur to all paes is a new rue tht nees to be in plac in your Rule
H. Or is there a rue now?
6. Why did you allow hi-give or grt hi the permssion to dig under our fence?
Ths is another thg we would go to jai for if we did ths.
7. Why did you allow hi or give hi permssion to bre and enter into our
property? Who gave them the right to cut our chai? Breakg and ilegally
enterig, in our opinon, is trspassing and should be against the law. We would
go to jail ifwe did tht. You al stte no favoritism???
8. Plea explai who gave the permssion for your (Idao Power) contrtor and
Blessinger with his employees to enter our propert?
9. Why will you not show us the policy-rue(s), law tht allows ths kind of
behavior? We ar askig agai for a copy of the rues, reguations, procedures tht
describe gi notice to land-lot owners.
i o. Why do you not show the pictu of the power pole with the trsformer on it tht
is in Blessingers lot?
1 i. Why will you not disclose the reasn(s) why he could not us th power pole?
Th is still right next to his buildig with a trformer on it.
12. Why will you not give, allow Blessinger servce when he has repeatedly asked for
his own servce, for his own use and on his own propert? Or is he telling you a
differnt story th he is tèlling us? Ths has crte major upsets, haassment
issues, they laugh they bra th they got away with and tok advantage of ths
sitution; that the Police, Idaho Power an the PUC are backig them i 00%. He
sems to be gettg special favors in our opinon. Because no-one is helping us to
resolve ths matter. We ar the only lot owner tht have to sha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You ar justifyg what you have done to us using the Rule H. It is not fuly trth
what you have describe to other, in our opinon.
In our opinon you ar telling everyone concerned th many businessesshare
servce and tht they do not complai.. . . You neglect to show or tell the trth in our
opinon. You are merely describing in our opinon, ths kind of an example; a
buildig with 4 bays, a duplex, four-plex or an apent building etc... and yes they
do all shae service. Have you forgotten we ar indepdent prope owners? Ths is
a Commercial subdvision tht wa origily sold to private business owners and we-
they were each told that they would be requied to obta their own power, telephone
water, septic etc... .for their own us. That was how it was described in our purchas
and saes ageement. Each and every lot owner was and stll is reui to obta
separte service!!! We ar stl waiti on tht list of others tht shae servce exactly
like you have done to us. When the new lot owner south of us intals 3 phae or
single phae, we ar askig now, for free servce for, to our 4 buildings. Hopefuly it
will be 3 Pha!
Drwigs arè submitted of the approximate location of the servce box and of the stae
location where the sece trsformer boxes were to be for each lot, (except for the lot
owner tht inled their boxes nea their buildigs and or near the middle of their lot
etc...) Whch we should have done if we'd only known wh you were going to do ths to
us!!!
Enclosed is a pictu of the marker-stae for the loop (connection) to the serce box tht
was for-to servce both lots. It is on Blessingers propert, inide his fence. Lokig at the
photo; Blessiner's drveway is to the left and our fence to the right. He only neeed to
order servce, instal his own box and hook it up. It would have all been on his own
proper. The marker clearly shows where his service was to be insled for his lot.
Diggg under the fence tag advantae of us, tag the opportty to obt fr
serice is not legal in our opinon or at the lea should never have ben alowed, .ever!!!
-
In our opinon you have singled us out, taen away and violated all of our Constitutiona
rights with regard to our private propert and devalued out lot. We have been
discted agait; you have not allowed us the sae us as all of the other lot owner
in the sae facilty. Why ar we not allowed our own service? Why is Blessinger not
allowed his own servce? He has sad he does not want ths either. Why we are
wrngfly made to sha? Then you'll make us pay agai for seice to be broUgt in
agai for our other buidings!!! Who els ca hook-up for fr? Wher ca we locte
servce tht no-one else gets fre servce in the futue? Please show on the maps enclosed
an exactly where to locate servce. If we sell the propert we want to disclose to the new
owner wha the sitution is with reard to power or the lack of.
As for the anwer you gave that Blessinger does not work for Idao Power, I will stad
corrected. Another play on words on your par in my opinon... .He is a sub-Contractor
tht instaUs undergund utities and or digs the trench-ditch and tht ca mea for
another contractor, EXALE; H & H utilities, or Tra electrc etc. ..th do contr
work for Idaho Power. His employee told us tht they did work instling the
underground utilities and it included Idao Power. Sorr if I misunderstood what he
showed me, the bilings etc...Blessiner paid $128.70 for his line, not an ination fee
in our opinon, (Bas chage and wie).We paid for our line also...$102.45, plus $144.00
engiee fee, plus $20.00 connection chage, NOTE; Blessinger ha his crdite and
taen offhis bil!!! Stil not processed the same, is ths fai in your èyestoo? The
Commission ha a need to balance was the comment? Order No. 27680 Unfaily in our
opinon!
Adequate power at ths tie is not the problem. Have Donad Howell. II come out and se
the trth- witness to the facts in person, meet us and see what has taen place, and then he
can go back and make his reprt then he'll have to live with what he chooses to do. What
action he taes, will it prove our point? And most importt to us, is ther an hones
persn left in our soiety?
Many procedures, ruès and the laws need to be changed, so we can have our own serce
for our own intended use. Not pay for the neighbors' service years later. You should be
reuied fu give notice, you should ask pession, inorm a lot-land owner before givig
away the servce we paid for. You should be reui to give notice before mag a lot
owner pay for what he thought was his intended use; power-servce for his lot, that he-she
maybe paying for all or par of the rest of the subdivision.. ...etc... With no refuds in the
futu either. Both lot owner are extemely upset and have ben complaig and
appartly it ha all fallen on dea ear. Both partes want their own separate power-
servce, is this not reon enough?
Enclosed are the photos, Idao power maps sad another drwig trg to prove our
point. Plea come out and physically look at the sitution sO tht you ca addrs the
facts.
Truy,
PtØc- A-- g ÓWevl:
A.M. Scott & Pamela A. Bowers