HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170306_5209.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM 1
DECISION MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER RAPER
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF
FROM: BRANDON KARPEN
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
DATE: MARCH 3, 2017
SUBJECT: APPLICATION OF FALLS WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR
AUTHORIZATION TO BUILD A NEW WATER SOURCE, AND ACCESS
TO THE SPECIAL PLANT RESERVE ACCOUNT; CASE NO. FLS-W-17-
01
On February 10, 2017, Falls Water Company, Inc. filed an Application requesting
that the Commission authorize the Company to construct an additional well, well house,
pumping equipment, and controls, and accept those expenses as rate base in a future rate case.
The Company further requests access to a “special plant reserve fund” created by Commission
Order in 2012.
BACKGROUND
The Company’s current rates took effect on October 16, 2012. As part of that rate
case, the Commission criticized a Company decision to install costly automated meter reading
equipment without consulting with Staff beforehand, noting that the Company’s troubling
decision would have been disallowed “if the Company were a larger utility.” Order No. 32663 at
11. As a result, the Commission required that the Company establish a special plan reserve fund
to finance infrastructure projects as approved by the Commission. The Commission further
stated that it “strongly encourages the Company to consult with Commission Staff before it
begins any such projects.” Id. (emphasis in original).
THE APPLICATION
The Company now seeks permission to construct a new well and associated plant. It
states that it needs the new well to comply with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
water pressure requirements. The Company estimates a total project cost of $647,215.
Application at 2.
DECISION MEMORANDUM 2
The Company requests that this Application be processed by Modified Procedure, but
does not request any kind of effective date.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs in the Company’s proposal to process this case by Modified Procedure.
However, before suggesting a comment deadline, Staff must review the Application, evaluate
anticipated discovery requirements, and consult with the Company. Staff anticipates this will be
completed within a week. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission issue a Notice
of Application and direct Staff to present the Commission with a proposed comment schedule
after conferring with the applicant.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission wish to issue a Notice of Application and direct the parties to
confer and develop a comment schedule?
M:FLS-W-17-01_bk