Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090601Decision Memo.pdf& DECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMSSIONER KEMPTON COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER REDFORD COMMSSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKNG FILE FROM:BRYAN LANSPERY TJGOLO DATE:JU 1,2009 RE:APPROVAL OF ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE TARIFF CASE NO. IPC-E-09-07 On March 13,2009, Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power, Company) filed an Application for authority to increase its rates due to the inclusion of Advanced Metering Inastrctue (AMI) investment in base rates. On May 29,2009, the Commission issued Order No. 30829 approving recovery of$IO,497,354 in additional revenue and requiring the Company to .file tariff schedules designed to recover the amount. On June 1,2009, the tariff schedules were filed with an effective date of June 1,2009. The Staffhas reviewed the filed schedules and finds that they do not comply with Order No. 30829. Specifically, the Commission ordered "that the revenue deficiency be spread over the affected classes. . ., leading to an average increase of 1.83 % for each of the affected classes." (emphasis added) See Order No. 30829, page 5. The Company has applied a 2.08% unform increase to the energy rate of each affected class. Since the fixed biling components are unafected and energy consumption varies by class, the resulting overall increase in base revenues equals the approved $10,497,354, or 1.83%, but varng percentage increases among customer classes. For example, the Company's method produces a 1.60% increase in base revenues for Schedule 24S (Secondar Irrgation) and a 1.96% base revenue increase for Schedule 1 (Residential) customers. In all, the Company's proposed method of distributing the rate increase produces a range of base revenue increases from a low of 1.60% (excluding Schedule 41, Street Lighting) to a high of2.08%. DECISION MEMORANDUM - 1 -JUE 1,2009 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that Idaho Power's proposed rates due to the inclusion of AMI investment do not comport with the Commission directives of Order No. 30829, and therefore recommends that the Commission deny approval of the revised tariff schedules as filed by the Company direct the Company to resubmit taffs reflecting the intent of the Commission. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission approve the revised taff schedules as fied, or direct Idaho Power to resubmit tarff schedules reflecting a 1.83% increase to each afected customer class? udmemosldaho Power AM tariff June 1,2009 DECISION MEMORANDUM - 2-JUE 1,2009