20160822_5040.pdf

DECISION MEMORANDUM 1
DECISION MEMORANDUM

TO: COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER
COMMISSIONER RAPER
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
COMMISSION SECRETARY
COMMISSION STAFF

FROM: DAPHNE J. HUANG
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

DATE: AUGUST 15, 2016

SUBJECT: IDAHO POWER’S APPLICATION TO APPROVE OR REJECT THE
THIRD AMENDMENT TO ITS FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT
WITH RIVERSIDE INVESTMENTS I, LLC FOR FARGO DROP HYDRO,
CASE NO. IPC-E-16-16

On August 12, 2016, Idaho Power Company filed an Application seeking approval of
the Third Amendment to its Firm Energy Sales Agreement (FESA) with Riverside Investments I,
LLC. The Agreement falls under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA),
and is a contract for the sale and purchase of electric energy generated by the Fargo Drop hydro
facility, a PURPA qualifying facility (QF). The Amendment changes the Net Energy Amount
notification process, similar to the process that the Commission has approved for Idaho Power
involving more than 20 other Energy Sales Agreements (ESAs). Idaho Power asks that the
Commission approve its Application upon Staff’s review and without further process.
Application at 4.
BACKGROUND
The Commission approved Idaho Power’s Agreement with Riverside Investments I,
LLC in 2012. Order No. 32451. In 2014, the Commission approved the Company’s First
Amendment, which changed the definition of the Mid-Columbia Market Energy Cost in the
Agreement consistent with a Commission-approved stipulation. Order Nos. 33184, 33053. In
March 2016, the Commission approved the Company’s Second Amendment, which changed
references in the Agreement from “Riverside Investments, LLC” to “Riverside Investments I,
LLC.” Order No. 33521. Idaho Power and Riverside Investments I, LLC (hereafter “Riverside”)
agreed to the Third Amendment on June 22, 2016.
DECISION MEMORANDUM 2
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
In the Third Amendment, Idaho Power and Riverside propose a change in the Net
Energy Amount notification process to allow Riverside “to adjust the ‘Initial Year Monthly Net
Energy Amounts’ on a monthly, rather than quarterly, basis.” Application at 3. Under the
amendment, Riverside “can submit future revisions on a monthly basis, with a minimum of 30
days’ notice prior to the beginning of the next month, rather than once every three months.” Id.
Idaho Power indicates that, with this change, Riverside “gains more clarity and flexibility in
adjusting its estimated energy deliveries and Idaho Power maintains the stability in the estimates
necessary for its planning and operation.” Id. at 4.
Idaho Power notes that, since August 2014, the Commission has approved more than
20 FESAs/ESAs between Idaho Power and QFs that allow the QFs to change the Initial Year
Monthly Net Energy Amounts on a monthly basis. Id. at 2. Also, the Commission has approved
FESA/ESA amendments similar to that here. Id. at 3, citing Order Nos. 33358, 33359. In Order
No. 33102, the Commission stated, “we find that monthly, as opposed to quarterly, reporting of
energy generation estimates is a reasonably negotiated term between the parties and not
inconsistent with the Commission’s [earlier] guidance and findings.” Order No. 33102 at 6;
Application at 3.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Given the limited scope of the Amendment, and consistent with the Commission’s
prior Orders, as cited above, Staff recommends that the request be approved without further
process.
COMMISSION DECISION
Does the Commission wish to approve the Application without further process?

M:IPC-E-16-16_djh