20101116HellsCanyon AFUDC Status Report.pdf

1SIDA~POR(I
An IDACORP Company
LISA D. NORDSTROM ì D ¡~,r~9Lead Counsel _ \ \¡H~~)
Inordstromtaidahopower.com U \ L. i ,'.- ~
: 52
November 15,2010
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Jean D. Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
472 West Washingtqn Street
P.O. Box 83720 i
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Re: Case No. IPC-E-08-10 - Compliance Filng
Hells Canyon AFUDC Status Report
Dear Ms. Jewell:
In Order No. 30722, the Commission ordered Idaho Power Company to file a
status report for the relicensing of the Hells Canyon facilities along with the
accumulation of AFUDC. Therefore, enclosed for filing are an original and seven (7)
copies of a status report which describes the relicensing process along with evidence to
support collection of AFUDC in rates beyond December 31, 2010. The Company wil
continue collection of AFUDC in rates going forward as authorized in Order No. 30722
unless it receives a Commission order directing otherwise.
If you have any questions with regard to this report, please do not hesitate to
contact me at the above number.
Very truly yours,
òf~r¡.~~
Lisa D. Nordstrom
LDN:csb
Enclosures
cc: Service List (w/encl.)
1221 W Idaho St. (83702)
P.o. Box 70
Boise. ID 83707
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 15th day of November 2010 I served a true and
correct copy of the within and foregoing HELLS CANYON AFUDC STATUS REPORT
upon the following named parties by the method indicated below, and addressed to the
following:
Commission Staff
Weldon B. Stutzman
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
472 West Washington
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Neil Price
Deputy Attorney General
Idaho Public Utilties Commission
472 West Washington
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Industrial Customers of Idaho Power
Peter J. Richardson
Greg Adams
RICHARDSON & O'LEARY PLLC
515 North 27th Street
P.O. Box 7218
Boise, Idaho 83702
Dr. Don Reading
Ben Johnson Associates
6070 Hil Road
Boise, Idaho 83703
Idaho Irrigation Pumpers
Association, Inc.
Randall C. Budge
Eric L. Olsen
RACINE, OLSON, NYE, BUDGE &
BAILEY, CHARTERED
P.O. Box 1391
201 East Center
Pocatello, Idaho 83204-1391
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE-1
-l Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email Weldon.stutzmanßimuc.idaho.gov
-l Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email Neil.price(âpuc.idaho.gov
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email peter(ârichardsonandoleary.com
greg(ârichardsonandoleary.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email dreading(âmindspring.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email rcb(âracinelaw.net
elo(âracinelaw.net
Anthony Yankel
Yankel & Associates, Inc.
29814 Lake Road
Bay Vilage, Ohio 44140
Kroger Co. I Fred Meyer and Smiths
Michael L. Kurt
Kurt J. Boehm
BOEHM, KURTZ & LOWRY
36 East Seventh Street, Suite 1510
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Kevin Higgins
Energy Strategies, LLC
Parkside Towers
215 South State Street, Suite 200
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Micron Technology
Conley Ward
Michael C. Creamer
GIVENS PURSLEY, LLP
601 West Bannock Street
P.O. Box 2720
Boise, Idaho 83701-2720
Dennis E. Peseau, Ph.D.
Utilty Resources, Inc.
1500 Liberty Street SE, Suite 250
Salem, Oregon 97302
Department of Energy
Lot R. Cooke
Arthur Perry Bruder
Office of the General Counsel
United States Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20585
Routing Symbol GC-76
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - 2
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email tony(âyankel.net
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email mkurtz(âBKLlawfrm.com
kboehm(âBKLlawfrm.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email khiggins(âenergystrat.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email cew(âgivenspursley.com
mcc(âgivenspursley.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email dennvtemp(âyahoo.com
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email Lot.Cooke(âhg.doe.gov
Arthu r. BruderCchg .doe. gov
Dwight D. Etheridge
Exeter Associates, Inc.
5565 Sterrett Place, Suite 310
Columbia, MD 21044
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email detheridgeCcexeterassociates.com
Community Action Partnership
Association Of Idaho
Brad M. Purdy
Attorney at Law
2019 North 17th Street
Boise, Idaho 83702
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email bmpurdYCchotmail.com
Snake River Allance
Ken Miler
Snake River Allance
P.O. Box 1731
Boise, Idaho 83701
Hand Delivered
U.S. Mail
Overnight Mail
FAX
-l Email kmilerCcsnakeriverallance.org
c£D!fkfLisa D. Nordstro
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - 3
2010 HELLS CANYON AFUDC STATUS REPORT
I. PURPOSE OF STATUS REPORT
In Case No. IPC-E-08-10, Idaho Power Company's ("Idaho Powet' or
"Company") last general rate case, the Company included construction work in progress
("CWIP") for the Hells Canyon relicensing as part of its revenue requirement. The
Company did not request that the Hells Canyon CWIP be included in rate base; instead,
the Company requested that the financing costs of accumulated funds used during
construction ("AFUDC") be allowed in rates as they occurred in 2009. The Idaho Public
Utilties Commission ("Commission") agreed with Idaho Power and the Commission
Staff that the Hells Canyon project presented unique circumstances and that it was in
the public interest to include the AFUDC in rates. Order No. 30722 at 14.
In Order No. 30722, the Commission ordered Idaho Power to file a status report
with the Commission by November 15, 2009, regarding relicensing of the Hells Canyon
facilties, including the accumulation of AFUDC. If the relicensing is not complete by
that date, the report should explain the Company's efforts to obtain the license, with
evidence supporting continued collection of AFUDC in rates beyond December 31,
2009.
The Hells Canyon Complex ("HCC"), comprised of the Brownlee, Oxbow, and
Hells Canyon dams, represents approximately 1 , 167 megawatts of nameplate
generation capacity. HCC continues to be an important source of low cost, clean
electric energy helping to keep rates low for Idaho Powets customers. The Company is
confident that the potential benefits associated with the continued operation of HCC wil
far exceed the current and potential costs of obtaining the new license. With this in
1
mind, Idaho Power considers the HCC relicensing project to be a viable, cost-effective
effort that wil ultimately serve the best interests of customers:
While not required by Order No. 30722, the Company is filng its 2010 Hells
Canyon AFUDC Status Report in recognition of the Commission's stated desire to be
updated on the Company's ongoing relicensing efforts.
II. EFFORTS TO COMPLETE RELICENSING
A. FERC LICENSE APPLICATION
Idaho Power filed a license application with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission ("FERC") in July 2003, two years before the original license for HCC
expired in 2005. Since 2005, Idaho Power has been operating under annual licenses
issued by the FERC. The relicensing of the HCC is complicated by its location on a
border river (Oregon/Idaho), immediately above (i) critical habitat for anadromous and
native fish (salmon and bull trout) listed as "threatened" under the Endangered Species
Act ("ESA"), (ii) the federally reserved Hells Canyon National Recreation Area, and (iii) a
seventy-mile stretch of the Snake River designated as "wild and scenic" under the Wild
and Scenic Rivers Act. The project also potentially affects two National Forests as well
as federal lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM").
Idaho Power filed the HCC license application with FERC under the "traditional
licensing process." FERC has now implemented two other licensing processes, the
"alternative licensing process" and the "integrated licensing process." The latter
process became the default process for obtaining a license in 2005, but was not
available in 2003 when Idaho Power filed its license application. The alternative
process was promulgated by FERC in 1997 and provides for pre-filng consultation with
2
interested agencies combined with a pre-filng environmental review process. However,
at the time the alternative process became available, Idaho Power had committed
substantial resources to technical studies and analysis in support of the traditional
process. The traditional licensing process generally consists of three stages. The first
and second stages generally involve pre-filng consultation and completion of studies
and preparation of a draft license application. Anticipating that there would be
widespread interest in the relicensing of the HCC, in the 1990s Idaho Power began
exploring opportunities to incorporate ongoing consultation throughout the first and
second stages to provide for greater stakeholder involvement in the license application
process. Through this more collaborative process, Idaho Power hoped to engage
interested stakeholders on the development of studies and technical analysis thatwould
address stakeholder concerns and strike an appropriate balance between project
operations and the protection, mitigation, and enhancement of resource values.
By the time the final license application was filed in 2003, Idaho Power had held
in excess of 200 meetings with stakeholders and completed more than 100 relicensing
studies at an approximate cost of $45 milion. The final license application, and the
technical and environmental studies that support it, is in excess of 35,000 pages and
provides a complete and comprehensive analysis of potential project impacts on the
environment and natural resources affected by the project. The filng of the final
application in July 2003 initiated the third stage under the traditional licensing process -
FERC consideration of project effects and the development of proposed license terms
and conditions.
3
On December 3, 2003, FERC issued a notice accepting Idaho Power's final
application and soliciting motions to intervene and protests. Twenty-seven parties filed
formal motions to intervene (some also filed protests) in the relicensing proceeding,
including four Native American Indian tribes, as well as numerous federal and state
resource agencies and non-governmental organizations such as American Rivers,
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, American Whitewater, the Northwest
Resource Information Center, and Idaho Rivers United.
B. FPA AND NEPA PROCEEDINGS
Under the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), and other applicable laws, FERC must
determine that a project, as licensed, wil be best adapted to a comprehensive plan for
improving and developing a waterway. In addition to the power and developmental
purposes for which licenses are issued, FERC must give equal consideration to the
purposes of energy conservation; the protection of, mitigation of damage to, and
enhancement of fish and wildlife; the protection of recreational opportunities; and the
preservation of other aspects of environmental quality. The National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA") complements the FPA process and is intended to ensure
that federal decision makers, and the public, have a firm understanding of the
environmental consequences of federal decisions so that actions implemented
adequately protect, restore, and enhance the environment.
Pursuant to the FPA and NEPA, in the fall of 2003, FERC initiated a scoping
process, holding meetings throughout the region on an initial environmental scoping
document prepared by FERC staff. FERC received oral and written responses to this
initial scoping document and in November 2004 issued a second scoping document.
4
On the basis of the information received from this scoping process, in October 2005,
FERC issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental review and set a 90-
day period for the filng of comments, terms, prescriptions, and recommendations.
Fifteen parties filed comments, terms, prescriptions, and recommendations in response
to the FERC notice. Idaho Power filed responses to these filngs in April 2006.
Some of the filings by federal agencies, particularly the U.S. Forest Service
("USFS") and BLM, contained mandatory conditions under Section 4(e) of the FPA.
Section 4( e) generally provides that FERC must include in a license for a project within
a federal reservation (such as a national forest or BLM lands) such conditions as the
applicable agency considers "necessary for the adequate protection and utilzation of
that reservation." Section 4(e) is a conditioning as compared to a veto authority. In
other words, the applicable resource agency (USFS or BLM) may not prevent FERC
from issuing the license, but .i FERC issues a license, the resource agency's conditions
must be included in the license. In Section 241 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
("EPAct"), Congress provided license applicants with a right to an evidentiary hearing on
contested mandatory conditions before an administrative law judge. Prior to the
enactment of the EPAct, there was limited opportunity to challenge the factual basis of
mandatory conditions. Idaho Power contested several of the mandatory conditions and
became the first hydroelectric license applicant to take advantage of the evidentiary
hearing process created by EPAct. Idaho Power resolved its contests to the mandatory
conditions through favorable settlements with the USFS and BLM in May of 2006.
5
C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
On July 28, 2006, consistent with the requirements of NEPA, FERC staff issued
a draft environmental impact statement ("EIS") for the licensing of the HCC, which
reviewed and analyzed Idaho Powets proposed operations and mitigation measures
together with the comments, terms, prescriptions, and recommendations previously
received. Various parties, including Idaho Power, filed comments to the draft EIS and
on August 31, 2007, FERC staff issued a final EIS for the licensing of the HCC. This
final EIS contains FERC staff's recommended terms and conditions for the licensing of
the project and wil be used by the Commission in the development of final license
conditions. Idaho Power has reviewed the final EIS and is developing comments for
filng with the FERC. However, certain portions of the final EIS involve issues that may
be influenced by the water quality certifications for the project under Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act ("CWA") and the formal consultations under the ESA, which remain
unresolved (see below). Idaho Power anticipates filng comments to the final EIS when
these processes progress to a point where their influence upon provisions of the final
EIS can be determined.
D. CLEAN WATER ACT PROCEEDINGS
Because the HCC is located on the Snake River on the border between Idaho
and Oregon, Idaho Power has filed Water Quality Certification Applications, required
under Section 401 of the CWA, with the states of Idaho and Oregon requesting that
each state certify that any discharges from the project comply with applicable state
water quality standards. These applications were filed with the respective states in
conjunction with the filng of the final license application with the FERC in 2003. Since
6
2003, Idaho Power has been working with the states in the development of necessary
information and proposed measures to ensure that any discharge from the project wil
comply with applicable standards relating to dissolved oxygen, total dissolved gas,
temperature, and other water quality standards. This work has included the completion
of technical studies and modeling to determine the effects of project operations on water
quality as well as the effcacy of proposed measures to address those effects. When
final proposals are developed and presented to the states for approval, notice wil be
given to interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the proposals. The states
wil then render a decision on the Section 401 applications, including any measures to
be included in the project license to address water quality impacts. FERC cannot issue
a license for the HCC until the states have issued water quality certifications under
Section 401 of the CWA. Under applicable provisions of the CWA, the states have one
year to issue a decision on a Section 401 application. Due to the complexities involved
and the need for additional technical analysis, Idaho Power, with the concurrence of the
states, has withdrawn and re-filed its Section 401 applications annually since 2003. The
states are processing the current applications, which were filed on September 24, 2010.
Idaho Power wil continue to work interactively with the Departments of Environmental
Quality to support their processing of the applications.
E. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CONSULTATION
In conjunction with the issuance of the final EIS, on September 13, 2007, the
FERC requested formal consultation under the ESA with the National Marine Fisheries
Service ("NMFS") and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") regarding the effect
of HCC relicensing on several aquatic and terrestrial species listed as threatened under
7
the ESA. However, to date, neither NMFS nor USFWS have initiated formal
consultation with FERC. Each agency continues to gather and consider information
relative to the effect of relicensing on ESA listed species. Idaho Power continues to
cooperate with NMFS and USFWS in the development of this information in an effort to
address any ESA concems. NMFS and USFWS are not expected to initiate formal
consultation with FERC unti the proposed water quality measures are final and the
Section 401 water quality certification process is complete. These water quality
certifications together with the information in the final EIS, as supplemented by Idaho
Power, should provide NMFS and USFWS with sufficient information to complete ESA
consultation, develop biological opinions, and make appropriate recommendations to
FERC for measures to be included in the project license to address ESA issues.
II. COMPLETION DATE
The FERC is expected to issue a license order for the HCC upon completion of
the Section 401 certification and the ESA consultation processes. As mentioned above,
certain provisions of the final EIS involve issues that may be influenced by the water
quality certifications for the project under Section 401 of the CWA and the formal
consultations under the ESA. When final proposals are developed and presented to the
states for approval, notice wil be given to interested parties with an opportunity to
comment on the proposals. The states wil then render a decision on the Section 401
applications, including any measures to be included in the project license to address
water quality impacts. FERC cannot issue a license for the HCC until the states have
issued water quality certifications under Section 401 of the CWA.
8
Under the most optimistic scenario, Idaho Power expects that a license could be
issued in 2013. However, due to the potential for contests to the Section 401
certification and biological opinions, it is possible that a FERC license may not be
issued until sometime after 2013.
iv. CONTINUED AFUDC COLLECTION
Based upon the current status of the HCC relicensing efforts detailed in Sections
II and ILL of this report, Idaho Power believes that it is reasonable and appropriate to
continue collecting AFUDC in rates for the HCC relicensing project in the amount of
$6,815,472 ($6,477,352 for the Idaho jurisdiction) pre-tax as authorized by Order No.
30722. Continued collection in rates remains consistent with the Commission's stated
rationale for authorizing such collection in Order No. 30722. Idaho Power is stil more
than a year away from acquiring a license and continues to spend money to relicense
the Hells Canyon Complex. As a result, the Company believes that it wil continue to be
appropriate to collect the AFUDC for the HCC relicensing project in rates until the
project is completed and included in rate base. The AFUDC amount for the HCC
relicensing project is expected to be approximately $9 milion in 2010; however, the
Company is not requesting at this time to adjust the amount currently collected through
rates.
As of September 30, 2010, Idaho Power has spent in excess of $115 milion
($127 milion less $12 milion in pre-tax AFUDC estimated collections) in support of
Hells Canyon relicensing. As the Commission previously explained, ". . . the lengthy
duration of the project, and an as yet unknown completion date, mean that AFUDC is
already significant and wil continue to accumulate to alarming levels . . .. The amount
9
of AFUDC included in rates now wil reduce the total project costs that ultimately wil be
included in rate base, thereby reducing future rate increases." Order No. 30722 at 14.
Beginning in February 2009, Idaho Power began recording the accrual of monthly
estimated revenue collections for both the tax portion and principal for AFUDC
associated with the Hells Canyon Complex relicensing. These monthly estimates are
based on the forecasted Idaho monthly retail sales. The amortization of these costs wil
commence once the Hells Canyon Complex relicensing costs are placed in-service.
The Company is also recording monthly interest on the accrued pre-tax balance
for the AFUDC associated with the Hells Canyon relicensing. The interest is calculated
using the monthly AFUDC rate. The entries wil be recorded monthly until the Hells
Canyon Complex relicensing costs are placed in-service and are as follows:
(1 )
To record the monthly estimated revenue collection for both the tax and pre-tax
portion of the Hells Canyon Complex relicensing AFUDC. This entry started in February
2009 and wil continue until the new license is received.
449108 Provision for Rate Refunds $XX
229105 Accumulated Provisions for Rate Refunds - Pre-Tax $XX
229106 Accumulated Provisions for Rate Refunds - Tax $XX
(2)
To record monthly interest.
431090 Other Interest Expense $XX
229105 Accumulated Provision for Rate Refunds - Pre-Tax $XX
10
As of September 30,2010, the accrued balances in the accounts associated with
the AFUDC costs are as follows:
229105 - Accumulated Provision Pre-Tax1
229106 - Accumulated Provision 2009 Tax
($11,590,995.65)
($7,030,205.60)
The accumulated provisions in both Accounts 229105 and 229106 wil be
transferred to a regulatory liabilty account once the provision has been fully provided
for. Amortization of the total estimated AFUDC revenues accrued wil be over the life of
the permanent license once it is received.
1 The balance in Account 229105 also includes interest in the amount of $640,519.65.
11